Slashdot Mirror


Square Enix Facing Class Action Suit Over FFXI "Hidden Fees"

A class action lawsuit has been initiated against Square Enix over the fees they charge for subscription-based MMO Final Fantasy XI. The court filing alleges "deceptive advertising, unfair practices, and fraudulent concealment" of information about the game's pricing model, essentially saying Square Enix doesn't clearly advertise that there is a monthly fee, and that failure to pay can result in late fees and account termination. The plaintiff is seeking a settlement in excess of $5,000,000 and including "all persons who purchased or played the online games four years prior to the filing of this lawsuit."

76 comments

  1. late fees? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    monthy charges make sense but late fees!? it's an MMO not a utility so it's not like they can't suspend your service if you don't pay.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:late fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the whole idea is that they can suspend your service if you don't pay, it's just that it's a toy and not something important.

    2. Re:late fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but but but

      there are NO late fees! if your credit card is bad, has a 0 balance, gets changed, or gets rejected for any reason they just cancel your content ids. (not delete!)

      you are free to register some other device and play again for same monthly fee you should have paid...

      this whole lawsuit is a troll

  2. From TFA: by Myji+Humoz · · Score: 5, Informative

    The complaints are:
    1. Licensing of the online games software disguised as a sale
    2. Monthly fees ("fees") to play online games
    3. Penalties for late payment fees
    4. Interest charges for late payment fees
    5. Charges while the online game account is suspended
    6. Termination of the right to use the online game for late payment of the fees
    7. User restrictions and conditions related to the online games
    8. Termination of game data for late payment of the fees

    Lets see...
    1) Normal for mmos
    2) Normal for mmos
    3) Sounds like a credit card company
    4) Sounds like a credit card company
    5) Sounds like a scam company
    6) Hello, if you don't pay for something, are you shocked that they cut it off?
    7) Their game, their rules
    8) Their game, their rules

    All in all, this set of complaints seems to boil down to: "your billing department is confusing."

    --
    Signatures are the new names.
    1. Re:From TFA: by Morlark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I was going to say something similar, but you've pretty much nailed it. FFXI may have some dumb policies, but they're up-front about it. Some of the complaints this lawsuit makes are just plain stupid though. What a waste of the court system's time.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    2. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #3, 4 and especially 5 are actually pretty damning.

      You do realize they are NOT a credit card issuer or bank...and even those fall under heavy regulation.

    3. Re:From TFA: by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I think complaint #5 has traction...

    4. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All in the EULA, so where is the case?

    5. Re:From TFA: by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the first I've heard of such credit-card like terms.

      Blizzard is very cool with the subscriptions. I used to buy the cards for the longest time and they counted exactly 30 days every time. When you enter a new key card you get the whole 30 more days from whatever day you enter it....

      I've had to turn off the subscription fees (and not play the game) a few times as well, and they just stop it and start it when you pay... they don't do stupid crap like late fees or interest on a pay-per-time account.

      These people deserve to be sued. You don't have a contract to keep paying on a timed account. If you don't pay you "quit" by default.. what a way to keep customers.

    6. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think complaint #5 has traction...

      I mean really, If I don't pay for their service, then they have a right to discontinue said service. But charging me while said service is discontinued? I believe that will hold water.

    7. Re:From TFA: by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      it's not reasonable for the industry. When you sign up for any other MMORG it's pretty much pay-as-you-go... if you stop paying them , you stop going. Nice and simple. They're adding late fees and paying for the time you missed (if they disconnect you for a month you STILL pay for it!) in order to KEEP playing your account and not have your account deleted.. that's not something anybody signing up for an MMORG would expect.

      I paid for Wow with cards for a long time and had 3 month gaps because I had other things to do with my money that month and they never charged a "fee" to turn the game back on, or to pay for the months I didn't play. I paid money and played my days... if they want me back they'll keep the tiny amount of space my character takes online to be ready for my bucks when I pay.

    8. Re:From TFA: by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Most mmo's you pay at the start of the month, FFIX you pay at the end. If I don't pay my bill to Blizzard - they just shut off my account and end of story. My character is still there, and when I want to play again I can buy more time no questions asked. I know this is the same way CCP bills customers too.

      From what I understand If I don't pay my FFIX account they bill me anyhow, and it eventually send it off to collections and it goes against your credit record. Oh and they delete your character (I've never played the game, but I heard the leveling process and grind is truly epic) - plus they charge you more money for the more characters you have. Those few extra kilobytes in their database must add up I guess.

    9. Re:From TFA: by Unoti · · Score: 1

      5. Charges while the online game account is suspended

      #5 sounds like Sprint. I had a cell phone with Sprint. I started traveling for a few months full time for my job, left my cell phone at home (lost it actually) and was too busy to cancel my Sprint account or replace the phone. I stopped paying the bill, and 6 months later Sprint is telling me I owe them like a thousand dollars, even though I never touched the phone, and even though they had terminated my account a months before. It went into collections, and they wouldn't work with me when I returned home and wanted to get cell service again. It'll be a cold day in hell before I ever do anything with Sprint again.

    10. Re:From TFA: by SB5 · · Score: 1

      #5 does, think about a "Members Only" club, lets say you get a little too drunk, and end up getting tossed out and banned for a week... Do you still have to pay your monthly dues or membership fees?

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    11. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. You were too busy to cancel, yet they terminated the account and continued to invoice you after the termination?

    12. Re:From TFA: by binkzz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be honest, Your debunks 1 & 2 don't hold any merit for me.

      Just because others do it didn't get me any slack in kindergarten, I don't see why it should for companies.

      3 & 4 sound horrible, but not particularly illegal. They would convince me not to play the game, even though I pretty much always pay on time.

      5 is outrageous I think.

      6. Sounds reasonable

      7. I don't know what the the restrictions and conditions are. That it's their game, doesn't mean they can legally put in any condition or restriction they would like.

      8. Is more interesting in my opinion, because I don't believe the character should (legally) be or remain property of the MMOG.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    13. Re:From TFA: by bentcd · · Score: 1

      To be honest, Your debunks 1 & 2 don't hold any merit for me.

      Just because others do it didn't get me any slack in kindergarten, I don't see why it should for companies.

      3 & 4 sound horrible, but not particularly illegal. They would convince me not to play the game, even though I pretty much always pay on time.

      I would say that if it is indeed the case that these policies are hidden from the customer then 1-4 are probably outright fraudulent. I have no idea how well such a claim may hold up though.

      In Norway there are some companies that advertise ring tones, cell phone themes and such at about $5 a piece (or so you may think). You send them an SMS, they send you the stuff back, and your cell phone bill is docked the charge. Except what you may not realize when you are placing the order is that you have /actually/ subscribed to their program, which costs $5 a month - or more - until you actively cancel it. They will dock your cell phone bill every month (or even week) until then. This has been in the media recently and it was quite clear that if these companies did not /very clearly/ explain the subscription nature of the purchase in their advertising then they would be in trouble with Norwegian consumer protection laws. The public shaming also prompted some to pledge to stop advertising in children's magazines (which is a slightly different matter, as children aren't actually legally able to enter into binding contracts anyway).

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    14. Re:From TFA: by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      I remember playing this game when it first came out, I was pretty disappointed by the game overall. Turning the account off was a pain, if you didn't do it right you'd still get billed. The billing scheme was kind of jacked but If anyone bothered to read the EULA all these terms are likely spelled out.(I didn't read it) I would be very surprised if a company as large as Square-Enix would leave such a large legal loophole. I do not agree with their billing scheme, but I have doubts that it is illegal.

    15. Re:From TFA: by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I don't think the analogy is very good. MMO subscriptions are a service, not a membership, and if you see what people were getting suspended for (with reviews that would take weeks, and then sometimes end in account termination, and other times end in nothing) - without any real participatory process - it is a real problem.

    16. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm ... wow. You must be a retard. You stopped using your phone and were upset that they kept billing you? That's not how it works you moron. They were still providing the service, whether you were using it or not.

      I'm not surprised they wouldn't work with you. I wouldn't want to do business with you either.

    17. Re:From TFA: by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      The fact that EULA's are not considered binding contracts (hell they aint even considered legal) in California and several other states. So why in hell should I read something that is not binding or even legal in my state?

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    18. Re:From TFA: by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but it's the idea of paying "late" fees and interest fees for "missing" payments after they stop you from paying that will draw the courts ire.

      Say you stop playing and max out the card so the account doesn't clear. In most games like WoW, they run the card a few days early and if it doesn't clear before your time runs out you're cut off until you fix the payment info. After all, you don't sign a lease or contract for a full year of subscription payments (most MMORGs are always Pre-paid, you pay up FIRST then play).. most MMORGs are "pay as you go" with no strings beyond you continuing to put the money in.

      Late fees and interest only apply to thing you sign some kind of official contract, like to Gyms or the Columbia Record Club and they continue to provide services when you are "late". You can't put those kinds of things in a pre-paid month-to-month EULA "click-thru" agreement. The company is offering month-to-month pre-paid play... there's no expectation given they'll do something after you stop playing, so they should get their money up front like everybody else.

      The question in court is how the "contract" was presented... I'd venture it was presented like any other pre-paid MMORG account until they started deducting extra fees from players beyond the monthly fees and pointed to the fine print. That's something nobody else running MMORGs does, why would people expect to look for it if it's not on the "front page" before you click OK to sign up? Seems like pretty important non-standard terms somebody should know about, hum? Courts aren't friendly to "contracts" that take a $15 per month pre-payment from a million people then start tacking on 100%+ fees in the "fine print" and taking it electronically without prior notice... it's about who has the upper hand and the company controls the account, the user access and the payment application... just because you "clicked OK".

    19. Re:From TFA: by evilkasper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wasn't really in fine print, found it pretty easy. http://www.playonline.com/ff11us/rule/index.html Check the Member agreement article 5a and 5c discusses fees in addition to subscription fee if you miss a payment. I'm not a lawyer, but its in the contract and if you give them access to your account/ credit card then you've agreed to their terms. If you can't be bothered to read the terms of use and user agreement then I have no sympathy, it was very easy to find once I decided to look for it. If you don't like it play any other of the 100's of MMO's that bill normally.

    20. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've played ffxi, and the way it works is that your bill is paid for monthly at the start of a month. If you stop paying (as in remove your credit card info) you can still use your account until the end of the current month assuming it had already been paid for. If you are banned from the game you do not get a refund for the current month (so if you get banned on day 2, you lose 28 days of paid playtime) however they don't charge you anymore after that. And finally if you are suspended (max: 72hours) it doesn't affect your billing cycle since it's assumed you want to continue to play the game uninterrupted once suspension is over, if this is not true burden is on you to let them know you no longer wish to play the game.
       
      There is no scam going on, it's basically common sense rules. I don't understand this about "late fees" there is no way to pay late in this game, if you don't pay on the start of the next month your account is temporarily closed until you pay your bill, there's no "late fee" since they simple close the account (they garantee keeping your info for at least 3 months so you don't lose anything, in reality they keep it for over a year but contractually they only garantee 3 months)

    21. Re:From TFA: by zoips · · Score: 1

      #3 and #4 don't happen, and #5 is the guy thinking that he shouldn't have to pay for the 3 days his character spent in jail for blatantly violating the ToS (and then probably badmouthing the GM).

    22. Re:From TFA: by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      You should probably do some research into how cell phones work if you're actually surprised here. This is 100% what I would expect from a cell phone company.

      A lot of people keep phones that they never use just in case of emergency, so Sprint keeps their service active and the customer keeps paying for that. They have no way of knowing if you're one of those people or someone who "can't be bothered" to call and cancel your service that you KNEW was automatically renewing. Sounds like your fuck up, not theirs.

    23. Re:From TFA: by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      These people deserve to be sued. You don't have a contract to keep paying on a timed account.

      While most of the items listed in the suit are bogus, interest payments and late payments certainly do sound suspicious.

      I'm rather surprised this is coming from Square Enix. *Everything* I've purchased from them has been of fairly high quality and worth the money. It's not like they produce buggy games (hello Konami!), or games that crash when you do something that you have to do to complete the game (hello EA!).

      Blizzard is very cool with the subscriptions.

      Yeah. It's dead simple - you pay, you play; you don't pay, you don't play. You want to stop playing for awhile? Fine, your character data is still there when you start back up. I wish they had a better way of dealing with families, but nobody is perfect.

    24. Re:From TFA: by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      From what I understand If I don't pay my FFIX account they bill me anyhow, and it eventually send it off to collections and it goes against your credit record. Oh and they delete your character

      Citation please. That is idiotic policy if true.

      For a company that makes truly *good* games[1], I just can't believe it.

      [1] My experience with Square Enix doesn't go beyond handhelds.

    25. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't cite anything - its just what a friend told me (who does play).

      While they do actually bill you at the beginning of the month, its actually for the previous month. Its spelled out here:

      https://secure.playonline.com/supportus/rule_polmember.html - they even outline all the late fee's you'll incur when you re-activate your account (and if you search Google there are people who have complained about them - even guys who forgot they had stopped playing and paying and got calls from collection agencies for multi-figure bills). I defy you to find a WoW or Eve Online player that has gotten a late fee.

    26. Re:From TFA: by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      they even outline all the late fee's you'll incur when you re-activate your account (and if you search Google there are people who have complained about them - even guys who forgot they had stopped playing and paying and got calls from collection agencies for multi-figure bills). I defy you to find a WoW or Eve Online player that has gotten a late fee.

      I don't know about Eve, but my WoW account lapsed when I had to switch card numbers last year (my gaming computer was in repair limbo at the time right after my identity got stolen). After I renewed payments, my characters were all still there and life (in Azeroth) went on.

      Even when my wife did something stupid and played on a private server, the whole account didn't get deleted, only the cheat character.

      I guess there are good reasons wny Blizzard has a near monopoly in the MMORPG market. But dang! I used to have such respect for Square Enix. Not any more ... :-(

    27. Re:From TFA: by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      S-E doesn't do late fees or interest either, I've played FFXI for years on and off. Those two complaints sounds like the plaintiff is mistaking their credit card company for S-E.

    28. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds a lot like a company I used to work for. They tried to sell their subscription-based online service as a utility. Same sort of crap - someone doesnt pay, they would keep your service active but add a "late fee" in addition to the monthly cost. So now you're in debt to their online service. They didn't have proper (instant, automated) activation, so they tried to charge a signup fee too. What??

      It's funny how profitable businesses can miss the boat SO FAR on online. Typically when that online service is run by the owner's golf buddy from the country club who doesn't know a thing about "that computer" or the intertubes connected to it.

    29. Re:From TFA: by coolingame · · Score: 0

      I've been away from making lotro gold for quite a long while. This isnâ(TM)t really a great hdro gold tip, but please bear with me as I get back into the lord of the rings online gold flow of bringing in thousands of herr der ringe online gold . First, this is an advanced lotro gold strategy requiring you to to have at least several hundred hdro gold as starting capital and have leveled your lord of the rings online gold Jewelcrafting and herr der ringe online gold Enchanting professions to a minimum of 350 each. If you are at least in your aion kina 60s and are able to do dailies in the aion gold Burning Crusade then this is a aion kina guide for you. As every aion gold Jewelcrafter knows, prospecting ore gets you aion powerleveling to use both for crafting jewelry and for use in aion powerleveln . You can make some aion powerleveling from doing this throughout your aion powerleveln . It is also a no-brainer that if you have a solid eve online isk from other activities (like BC dailies or auctioneering) you can drop the eve isk kaufen , buy all your eve isk from the auction house and pick up Enchanting to sell disenchanted materials from eve online isk kaufen . For anyone who has been practicing eve isk (or plans to) and has managed to raise both their eve online isk Jewelcrafting and Enchanting to 350, the following Jewelcrafting eve isk kaufen recipes are probably the cheapest and easiest to produce compared to the eve online isk kaufen you will get from selling their disenchants: guild wars gold Bloodstone Band guildwars gold Crystal Citrine Necklace guild wars gold Crystal Chalcedony Amulet guildwars gold Sun Rock Ring These cost only 2 guild wars items and one gem of the appropriate type, making guild wars items relatively cheap to produce. While I would recommend prospecting with silkroad online gold for the increased drop

  3. Some insight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've played this game since NA release and I've always known there is a monthly fee. I've never felt that it was hidden from me either.
    It's clearly stated that if your account is inactive for 3 months, your character is deleted. This is a stupid argument... It clearly states
    when signing up for the initial content ID that it costs $12.95 per month and you have to agree TWICE to purchase it. Every single content
    ID after that you have to AGREE and then CONFIRM that you will be billed an extra $1 per month. This person's pissed because he didn't
    want to pay for a game he was playing and then got penalized for basically stealing from the company providing the services.

    1. Re:Some insight. by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      I've played this game since NA release and I've always known there is a monthly fee. I've never felt that it was hidden from me either.

      I bought the game after release as well, and then decided to never play it because of the monthly fee (dumb purchase, but I was young and naive and apparently unable to read the box).

      Check, please!

    2. Re:Some insight. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your cheque is waiting at the returns counter where you purchased the game. Also, the boxed game comes with the first month of gameplay free, so you could have played it for a little while at least. If you've never registered the game online you can ebay it. This class action lawsuit is a farce.

    3. Re:Some insight. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      What other MMORG charges AFTER you stop paying? That's the issue. Most games operate on gamecards as well as subscriptions. If you miss adding the new card on time, you get turned off.. no hard feelings... When you pay up your new card starts THAT DAY.. no some pro-rated, late fee crap. That's what's new here.

      In other words the game is $15 per month but if you take a month off by stopping payments... you STILL PAY for the month off you didn't pay for to get turned back on. That's nasty as you don't sign any kind of contract to pay them for any length of time... if you stop paying, you stop paying.. that's how it works everywhere else.

    4. Re:Some insight. by aztektum · · Score: 1

      I bought this game, played the freebie month + 1 month, had to let my account lapse due to having a busy life and at one point thought about starting it up again. What I didn't realize was I would have to buy another boxed copy to get a new code, since I had let mine go for too long.

      citation provided

      Not standard practice for an MMO and not listed on the box. Where do I get my check?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    5. Re:Some insight. by TriezGamer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bullshit. They will delete your characters for inactivity (happened to me 3 times), but they leave your PlayOnline ID intact, and that's what the game is registered to. While you might have to start over, you are not required to buy a new copy of the game as long as you remember your POL ID and password.

      I know this from personal experience, having bounced back and forth between FFXI and several other games ever since FFXI's launch, and having been inactive for over a year in a stretch. If you were required to buy a new copy of the game, it's because you were perma-banned for a TOS violation.

    6. Re:Some insight. by Cabriel · · Score: 1

      What other MMORG charges AFTER you stop paying?

      Everquest. Sony charged my sister (who provided her credit card for me to use. Such a nice sister) for several months before she realized she was paying for three accounts instead of two (her and her husband). I definitely cancelled my account the day I stopped playing, but that didn't stop Sony from continuing the charges.

      I realize you were trying for a rhetorical question, but I have a contradictory experience.

    7. Re:Some insight. by Bluecobra · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that if you delete your PlayOnline ID you won't be able to use the code on your game again, and would have to buy a new boxed copy. It's not unreasonable to think that aztektum might of done this accidentally when he canceled his subscription. At least that how it was when I played the game when it first was released in North America.

    8. Re:Some insight. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      that's a recurring charge... you still have to tell them to stop taking the money. They don't know you stopped PLAYING. This is about you Choosing not to pay and being assessed a late fee for staring back up again.

      It sounds like the FF guys are charging you late fees if for some reason you don't renew your payment schedule on time. This would like paying with the WoW time cards and taking 2 months off by not buying one. Then having to pay extra to "make up" time you choose not to pay for even though they turned you off when your 60 day card expired. That's a big change to how MMORGs are charged.

    9. Re:Some insight. by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      This is a silly statement I have yet to see an MMO you can even log on to with out first giving them credit card info. Its like a 30 day free trial cancel or we charge you set up. Children likely do this all the time and MMOs are in general non refundable in most game stores because the only thing in them is the one time use license number and if its been used up and resold then the retailer is scamming the second customer. The root poster here for Some insight is missing the point. If you never missed a payment then your really not considered in this lawsuit. This lawsuit is about late fees. By having late fees and not treating the subscription as a pay as you go service. They are acting like you agreed in advance to pay for the game for X months which is likely not the case for people who would miss a payment. Most mmos just cut you off and wait for you to pay up not charge a late fee since your not late. You have no lease for playing FFXI

      --
      Momento Mori
    10. Re:Some insight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be fair SOE as much as they suck almost never deletes an account and neither Blizzard last time I checked. To much money in getting you addicted again so even though its in the terms I have only ever heard of Square doing it from the major mmos

    11. Re:Some insight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the FF guys are charging you late fees if for some reason you don't renew your payment schedule on time.

      This whole "late fee" thing is also bogus. Square Enix charges for the month ahead. So the first month you start playing after a break (they bypass this by giving new players the first month free) you get double charged. You get charged once for the month you come back (because you didn't get charged the previous month) and once for the next month. If you don't pay for your account the next month, it warns you every time you log in for the the month eafter telling you you need to set up a credit card and only have however many days to do it. If you do it, no extra "fee" is charged. If you hit the first day of the next month, your characters are disabled, you aren't allowed to keep playing something you aren't paying for. If you then pay on the 2nd day of the month or even til the 29th day of the next month, you get charged twice, as I said, once for the month you started playing and once for the next month. I've had few CCs expire and I've had one of my accounts disabled and this is how it happened.

    12. Re:Some insight. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I've played this game since NA release and I've always known there is a monthly fee.

      There surely HAS to be something on the front of the box. For example, I'm looking at the WotLK box and it has on the bottom left side: "Requires full versions of World of Warcraft and The Burning Crusade to play." And on the bottom right side: "Internet connection required, additional online fees apply".

      I cannot possibly believe Square Enix kept something like monthly fees a secret.

      when signing up for the initial content ID that it costs $12.95 per month

      Not bad. Cheaper than WoW unless you go for the 6 month-at-a-time plan.

      This person's pissed because he didn't want to pay for a game he was playing and then got penalized for basically stealing from the company providing the services.

      I think the problem may be in the rules. I've only played two online games (WoW and DDO), but they are based on a prepaid model and you cannot "steal" from someone on that basis.

      My expectations would be to pay X units of money for a certain time period and if I didn't pay, I couldn't play. I certainly would not expect additional (as in interest and penalty) charges to apply, but if they did I just wouldn't play the game. If any of the charges do stick in court, I would expect it to be something like that.

      When I stopped playing (and paying) for DDO Stormreach they offered me free time and leveling bonuses to lure me back in. I like playing grinding games, but once I lose a character for any reason it's Game Over and I don't go back. It sounds very much like a losing business model if Square Enix is charging interest and penalties to returning players (and deleting character data).

  4. I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am not willing to pay for a game that I must pay in perpituity to play. I will pay for a game ONCE. Only Once.

    MMOs are scams in this respect. You don't have a single player mode. You can't NOT play the game on line. (I would have Bought WoW had there been a way to either:

    1. Play a single player RPG not on line.
    2. Play on Servers that are not owned by Blizzard on independant networks/LAN.

    1. Re:I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMOs are a scam? Right. Say you don't like it, that's fine. But a scam? That's a bit far, as it's really in no way a scam. The charges are upfront, the prices are reasonable, and the services are there. And when the servers are done, they give compensation.

      So no scam that I can see. If you want a solo-game, there are plenty of other choices. I see no reason to slam Blizzard over not choosing to make a solo RPG game.

    2. Re:I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Good thing Blizzard doesn't make people play...

      Yes MMO's encourage you to play with other people - its kinda fun (at least I think its kinda fun). Sounds like you didn't have fun and now have an axe to grind.

    3. Re:I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stop playing WoW you can at any time pick it back up again reactivate your account. The game you payed for continues to work any time you choose to make use of it. This is not the case with Final Fantasy. If you cancel your account and stop playing for three months or more, then your game (not just your account) is now a useless brick and and can never be used again. That is pretty harsh for a game company. It is similar to the EA DRM people feared and fought EA so hard to drop from Spore where the game could only be installed so many times before it bricked itself.

      I know that I would definitely not buy software with restrictions like that posted on the box.

    4. Re:I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by HundchenKatze · · Score: 1

      Your statement "If you cancel your account and stop playing for three months or more, then your game (not just your account) is now a useless brick and and can never be used again." is not entirely true. Yes if you cancel your CONTENT ID then after 3 months Square Enix has the right to delete that content ID which is linked to your character. However your Play Online Account (POL) which is linked to the disc will never be deleted, and will always be accessible so long as you remember your POL ID and password.

    5. Re:I dropped WoW due to the basic nature of MMOs by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I am not willing to pay for a game that I must pay in perpituity to play. I will pay for a game ONCE. Only Once.

      More power to you. Why do you sound so threatened at something tens of millions of us find fascinating if it has no personal interest to you?

  5. I would say they have more of a case with FFIV+ by nebaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    They just released a Wii Channel game called Final Fantasy IV The After Years. It is 800 Wii Points, but what they don't tell you is that that is for "part 1". Parts 2-X (however many) are additionally 300 points and 800 for the final piece. They don't tell you that up front. Anyone who knows anything about FF knows XI is an online, MMO. That's why it is the one I avoided.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:I would say they have more of a case with FFIV+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly. Did you REALLY think you were going to get a complete installation of a AAA franchise game for $8? Something that would run for $40 if it were put on store shelves tomorrow? You should know better than that, especially if you knew enough about Final Fantasy to avoid FFXI.

    2. Re:I would say they have more of a case with FFIV+ by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

      While I'm inclined to agree the episodic format should be in the More Details, you do get this exact message when you try to buy it:

      Wii Points are required to access portions of the additional content or services associated with this game.

      The above should be an adequate warning for the potential buyer to go do some homework before committing to the purchase -- the add-on details are described in the manual, with a diagram. And the Shopping Guide tells you that the manual is freely available to read, also with a diagram.

    3. Re:I would say they have more of a case with FFIV+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mega Man 9 was around 1300 Wii points. That's a complete installation of a AAA franchise game.

  6. Oh people... by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Funny

    You bought it before you went to the save point. Now you'll have to lose several days of your life to restore from an earlier copy. You've played these games enough -- you should know better than to buy something new from the store where the stats aren't on the screen before saving. Jeez, hasn't gaming taught you anything???

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  7. Horrible billing by Squarewav · · Score: 4, Informative

    I played FFXI for 3 years on and off. The lawsuit is probably about the horrible way they do billing if you cancel and resubscribe.

    Billing (at least for me) was always on the first of the month.

    If you canceled on the 20th of January, and decide to resubscribe the 23rd of March you wouldn't actually be billed until the 1st of April at which point they charge you for a full month of March and for the month of April despite only using it for 8 days of March.

    In other words they don't prorate. It's a really archaic way of handling a MMO subscription. I'm not sure if this is listed in the ToS if it's not then there might be grounds for a lawsuit. $5M is still way to excessive for what should be in small claims court for $30

    1. Re:Horrible billing by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      $5m would be excessive, if it was for single person. This is a Class Action lawsuit, and 'all players for the past 4 years' are the plaintiffs. Therefore any award or settlement would end up paid out mostly to the laywers, and all of those players might get a dollar each.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    2. Re:Horrible billing by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      They won't even get a dollar each. They'll get "$1 off their next monthly fee, or $1 off a resubscription"

    3. Re:Horrible billing by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Ah, you have been part of the NetFlix settlement...

    4. Re:Horrible billing by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the post, pretty informative.

      It sounds like the real issue here is that they DID disable your service, but continued to charge, perhaps even for the month after you canceled. Particularly if you let your subscription lapse rather than manually canceling, they would keep both disable your service (cant play) AND keep charging you for service. HUH?

      I used to work for a company that ran as a half-pre-paid service and half always-on-utility. Sounds just like this awful Final Fantasy billing method. As soon as we could, I changed the billing to be pre-paid. Canceling is "cancel my subscription", not "turn my service off right this moment". Buying a month on April 1, buys the days from April 1 to May 1. Whether you play on any of those days is your own choice.

      Trying to charge late fees and interest for a pre-paid services doesn't make a damn bit of sense. Getting rid of paper checks (the most common excuse for "dont deactivate me I sent you money already!") is a great first step.

  8. omfg who still plays ffxi by elfhelm · · Score: 1

    All I have to say is just be glad your game was not shut down. Be glad you have lived out other games. Yet I am sorry for those that suffer.

    1. Re:omfg who still plays ffxi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      game still has 200,000~ subscribers, i doubt se is gona turn down millions a month in revenue... especially sense the game servers have been virtualized and will run alongside with their up coming offering, no reason to turn off that last virtual machine while you still have paying subscribers

    2. Re:omfg who still plays ffxi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. Now GTFO.
       

  9. different subscription type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lawsuit is dumb. I am sure the lawyers of square enix where smart enough to put all that crap into their terms and conditions.
    They are basically maintaining a traditional subscription model, while most other MMO's now a days use a pre-pay subscription model.
    Which perhaps i

    Now I am sure those people that filed the claim don't agree with that, but if they had read the terms/eula/whatever they could have found out. Instead of of course ripping the plastic off the box the second they came home, feverishly clicked 'next' in the installer to get playing.
    Not condemning that practice, heck I do that myself, but don't start complaining at the end that the terms of payment are different then you hoped.

  10. Strange Billing System by GearheadX · · Score: 1

    This may also be an aspect of the really odd way in which the billing system is set up, in which it is actively confusing as to how you cancel your subscription. Some people have made the mistake, in the past, of thinking that by canceling their character IDs, they cancel billing (under the reasoning that if you're being charged for individual characters already). In reality, billing is halted by canceling payments associated with the player's ID of the game itself.

    This is further compounded by the fact that, as far as I know, the only way to modify your account at all is through the client itself.

    1. Re:Strange Billing System by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      "Crisis Core" was handled in just about the same way when I downloaded it on my cell phone a few years ago. There's a 500 yen monthly charge, which they're totally up front about, but stopping the charges are another matter.

      The first i-mode mobile phone game I ever played was a Tetris clone that cost 150 yen per month, and the first time you loaded the application in a given month, the game would inform you of that fact, and that a new 150-yen charge would appear on your bill. You had the chance to say yes or no.

      So I had no idea that Crisis Core would be any different. I downloaded it for the first time at the beginning of a month, played it for a bit, realized that I wasn't getting much out of it, and deleted the application from my phone toward the end of the month.

      I wasn't receiving an itemized bill, and not until over a year later did I realize that I was still paying for that game, month after month, despite not playing it at all. Given my previous experience with monthly-fee games on that phone, it never occurred to me that they could charge you repeatedly without your explicit permission (and without you actually having the game).

      Fortunately I was able to remember the name of the game, and was able to get the Docomo Mobile staff to find it on their online menu, and was able to cancel the contract.

      $60 to play a pathetic little cell phone game for less than a month, thanks to a combination of their sneakiness and my ignorance. Live and learn.

    2. Re:Strange Billing System by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Well that pretty much rules out me ever subscribing to anything by squeenix. Is the weird billing a Japanese thing?

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Strange Billing System by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a Japanese thing so much as it's a "corporations squeezing money out of people whenever they can" thing, though it does seem like there's a bit more of this in Japan. I've had friends try to cancel telephone service because they're leaving the country, and the mobile phone company will tell them that certain papers have to be signed and returned by registered mail, etc., and they they'll take a week or so to get the papers to the customer, squeezing another week of unneeded service out of them. I'm sure this kind of stuff is pulled the world over.

      Also, an addendum: I may have been able to remember the name of the game when I deleted it from my phone, but I couldn't when I made that post. It was "Before Crisis" that was on cell phones, not Crisis Core. Crisis Core is on the PSP.

  11. FFIV was for SNES by tepples · · Score: 1

    Don't be silly. Did you REALLY think you were going to get a complete installation of a AAA franchise game for $8?

    Super Famicom games such as Final Fantasy IV and Super NES games such as Final Fantasy II (U) ordinarily cost $8 on Wii Shop Channel.

    1. Re:FFIV was for SNES by DarKnyht · · Score: 1

      Yes, Super Fanicom/Super NES games that were released long ago are normally 800 points. However, Final Fantasy IV: The After Years is an entirely new (well mostly new) game never released before in the States. If you spent anytime at all on any game site, you would know it was episodic. Even the wikipedia entry had this information for a year due to it originally being released in Japan for cell phones.

      If you buy your games without reading up on it first, you deserve to get burned. If you don't think their pricing scheme is fair, then don't purchase and spend your money elsewhere.

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
  12. Mr Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you losers, playing your endless online games. Go get a life.

  13. The points by JJJ_NL · · Score: 1

    I've played FFXI for about 5 years and am currently involved in a conflict with S-E. It relates to the following point: 5. Charges while the online game account is suspended This is relevant for those people whose account got hacked as well. My character got hacked, it did some things that S-E charges money for (a so-called world transfer, $25) and I got it returned after about a month. But to this date however, S-E has never refunded me the charges that weren't made by me, even though they said they would "after an internal investigation". Well, this "internal investigation" has gone on for *three months* now. There's a helpdesk I can call but they all say I'll get my refund "after the investigation has completed". I think this investigation thing is bullshit and that S-E basically has no mechanism in place to refund customers because that would cost *them* money after all. After having been a customer for 5 years (they made about $600 off me in playing fees alone), this feels like a kick in the nuts. F*ck S-E, I'll never do business with them again.

  14. square enix by t3chn0n3rd · · Score: 0

    square enix is a tokyo-based company , correct?