Slashdot Mirror


Daily Sex Helps Improve Fertility

mmmscience writes "While fertility studies lately seem to have been exclusively focused on in vitro fertilization [IVF], new data coming out of Australia may help with unaided successful conceptions. The study has found that men who have ejaculate daily produce sperm with less damaged DNA. While such actions decrease sperm concentration, it does increase motility, meaning healthier sperm have a better chance of making it all the way to the egg. Good news, as another report has found severe chromosome abnormalities in over 90% of IVF eggs, meaning artificial insemination is just now discovering a whole new field of problems."

26 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to do with sex... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

    Now to just find someone to spread it to..

    1. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by langelgjm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, because what this world needs is a bunch of Slashdotters reproducing :-P

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, I guess every sprem is sacred, for its death helps others succeed.

      Catholicism could learn a lot from this study!

    3. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Funny

      All those sperm, dying for your sins. That's ironic on so many levels.

    4. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sopssa · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can count my DNA will be *great*, as I wank atleast 4 times a day.

    5. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, I browse the world at +4

    6. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can count my DNA will be *great*, as I wank atleast 4 times a day.

      Hats off to those modding the above "informative"

    7. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, yes. Yes it does. As bad as this group is, it's far above the common troll. Consider idiocracy. Now go read 4chan, MSNBC, CNN and Fark. Then come back and comment about how the people here need to surrender their reproductivity to support the Darwinian selection of those mental giants.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

      Now to just find someone to spread it to..

      That's one way of looking at it.

      Here's another, less obvious one, which I read in a Timothy Leary essay about fifteen years ago:
      The anatomy contains organs that serve to keep the individual alive, such as heart, lungs, liver, etc.
      The anatomy also contains organs that serve no purpose in keeping the individual alive, but are focused on the preservation of the species, such as ovaries, whose sole function is to produce the female egg, and the prostate, whose sole function is to secrete a lubricant which aids in ejaculation, a strange little organ.
      Statistically, it seems these organs are the ones that do us in first, by "virtue" of being the most vulnerable to cancer, the highest rates among females being of the ovarian and breast variety, while the highest among males of the prostate variety.

      Could it be that as we gradually cease to use our procreative organs, as we are no longer useful to the natural order of things, nature itself has a mechanism to push us aside?

      And so, in inimitable style, Mr Leary, who was dying of prostate cancer then, concluded his musings with the following empirical conclusion and advice for us all: "Use it or lose it!"

      As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?" Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  2. Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the news services have all been reporting that Daily Sex will improve fertility - surely a more accurate description would be that daily ejaculation (via whatever means) improves fertility.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    1. Re:Summary misleading by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but the headline "Daily Ejaculation Helps Improve Fertility" would not help convince my wife to have sex with me. It would instead encourage her to send me to the bathroom with the SI Swimsuit issue.

      That is no good.

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      But I think that might be too much to ask for.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Summary misleading by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      News: BILL CLINTON POSTS ON SLASHDOT!

      Speaking of receipts - wouldt paying for getting a "Monica" now be tax-deductible as preventative medicine or something?

    3. Re:Summary misleading by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I sent my wife this article, she suggested we try "annual sex". Sounds pretty kinky to me. But first, I'm going to have to help her with her spelling.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      Shush - you're getting my husband all excited with the concept.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    5. Re:Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't you mean "Screen Shot or it didn't happen"?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    6. Re:Summary misleading by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      sounds better than aural sex

  3. slashdotters... by Luyseyal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  4. Internet Filter by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm... does that mean that if Senator Stephen Conroy's internet filter gets built, I can get a medical prescription to download porn?

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
  5. 90% ??? I call Bull. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IVF has been around a few years. In fact, it's been around since 1978, if you want to take it back to the first test tube baby.

    I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.

    Now, I'm not saying that there isn't any increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the procedure. But 90% chance of severe chromosomal abnormalities doesn't sound like it makes sense to me.

    Are there are molecular geneticists in the house?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  6. Re:Hold on... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does masturbation count?

    Yes

    Oh thank god.

  7. Whoo-hoo! by IonOtter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if frequent masturbation prevents cancer, then baby, lemme tell ya? I could CURE cancer. And now this?

    I just might start selling it, now?

    --
    [End Of Line]
  8. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.

    We have noticed. It is one of the reasons that multiple eggs are implanted, since so few of them are viable.

    This is related to why we have so many multiple births from IVF -- sometimes 2 or more of the implanted eggs are viable.

    Also note that IVF is done primarily when people have trouble conceiving normally, so incidence of abnormality should be high anyway... perhaps these abnormalities are part of the infertility issues that brought the patients to the fertility specialist in the first place.

    Someone I know very well has tried IVF twice... out of all the eggs that it was tried with (I think 6 or 8 each time), only one egg was viable... and that one miscarried during week 5.

    It's really not surprising to anyone who's been through it or has had frank discussions with someone who has.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  9. On autism! by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an autistic son and I think that "causes of autism" are something that is used far too often. My wife and I have thought about this and we see in our son's autism some of our own traits as its forbears. Rather than the litany of plastic bottles, vaccines, carbon monoxide, indoor air pollution and other bogus causes, we now wonder if autism is actually part of a natural evolutionary response to dealing with an increasingly complex human society.

    Perhaps we've evolved to deal with the fact that we are increasingly specialized, as our society feeds back into our own natural selection, and, we've reached a sort of a tipping point where autism is the next step.

    We've been very fortunate in that our son has responded extremely well to aggressive therapy, all, by the way, provided by the taxpayer... (makes this old Republican rethink some of his own values). And, we wonder if, perhaps, a different sort of society might emerge from autism, that, we see it as a disability because we value our own communication so much. Perhaps autism is something that will never be cured, but, people who are autistic can move onto lead intelligent and productive lives if only there is intervention and ever better education and socialization for them and in a way that makes sense, for them.

    Regardless of all of that though, I can say this. I'm proud of my son for who he is. When I first heard of his diagnosis, I almost felt like he had died and I was very angry about it. Sometimes, I admit, I still am. But, overall, if I could do it all over again, and make a choice about having an autistic child, I would gladly keep the son that I have.

    I wouldn't trade him for anything in the world.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:On autism! by 93,000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to be all Jenny Mcarthy on you, because I don't agree with her opinions on vaccinations, but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet. FWIW, I have no medical background other than that I happen to be celiac (which I know makes me inherently biased towards GF) and am a huge nerd who reads lots of boring research. Not implying that gluten is a 'cause', as you say, but just that the diet seems to work very well for many with autism. You've very likely heard of/explored that option, but thought I'd throw that out there just in case.

      I admire you very much for your honesty, particularly about your initial feelings about your situation. I'm very glad you are in a good place. I wish you and yours the best.

  10. Cruel by slave_to_coffee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posting this on Slashdot is like sending Pizza Hut circulars to Ethiopia

  11. Daily Sex Helps Improve by dhermann · · Score: 4, Funny

    Daily Sex Helps Improve

    ...everything.