Slashdot Mirror


Gaze-Tracking Software Protects Computer Privacy

Ponca City, We Love You writes "Two years ago computer security expert Bill Anderson read about scientific research on how the human eye moves as it reads and processes text and images. 'This obscure characteristic... suddenly struck me as (a solution to) a security problem,' says Anderson. With the help of a couple of software developers, Anderson developed a software program called Chameleon that tracks a viewer's gaze patterns and only allows an authorized user to read text on the screen, while everyone else sees gibberish. Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes to show only that one person the correct text. After a 15-second calibration period in which the software learns the viewer's gaze patterns, anyone looking over that user's shoulder sees dummy text that randomly and constantly changes. To tap the broader consumer market, Anderson built a more consumer-friendly version called PrivateEye, which can work with a simple Webcam to blur a user's monitor when he or she turns away. It also detects other faces in the background, and a small video screen pops up to alert the user that someone is looking at the screen. 'There have been inventions in the space of gaze-tracking. There have been inventions in the space of security,' says Anderson. 'But nobody has put the two ideas together, as far as we know.'"

134 comments

  1. Flat screens! by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology. I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops. All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's. I don't care much for saving a few inches in depth, so I try to use CRT's whenever I can, because unless you're sitting directly in front and center of a flat screen anything, it's very difficult to read.

    1. Re:Flat screens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, did you base that all on the flat monitors you saw in 1989?

    2. Re:Flat screens! by Enleth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs? I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle. Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    3. Re:Flat screens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get an IPS panel LCD instead of a cheap TN panel LCD. Costs more, but looks much better.

    4. Re:Flat screens! by Kazin · · Score: 1

      I've got some 1905FP's also, and they're great. But all of the new stuff we're buying lately have the viewing angle problem, some WAY worse than others.

      My company does visual effects too, so the color-shifting effect is really frustrating for the artists.

    5. Re:Flat screens! by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was the case 5 or so years ago, but I can read my LCDs both at work (Dell 19") and at home (Samsung 24") from distance and from quite good angles. I'd suggest getting an eye test, and not just for long or short sightedness. You might have a degenerative condition that can be solved with laser therapy.

      In all seriousness, there is no reason to use a CRT in this day and age. The size, energy efficiency, contrast ratios, etc, of CRT monitors makes for a less than practical display.

    6. Re:Flat screens! by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Try using most types of laptop display. They have some very narrow viewing angles if you want things to look okay.

      Side to side isn't nearly as bad as up and down. The laptop I'm using (HP Pavilion dv9572) has a decent side to side angle, but if I reposition myself in the chair (moving it up/down or slumping/straightening my back) I have to readjust the display to get the proper look.

      And from what I understand, others are desperately seeking quality displays as well.

    7. Re:Flat screens! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all about the quality of the monitor. Cheap LCDs are lousy just like cheap CRTs were lousy - they just fail in different ways. Shop around and you can find a flat panel with a good viewing angle as well as decent color reproduction.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:Flat screens! by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show, one man's big is another man's feature.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    9. Re:Flat screens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most LCDs use cheap TN panels with comparatively awful color reproduction and viewing angles. It can be a bit more difficult to find a nice display (the non-TN type), but the quality is certainly much nicer and more comparable to "classic" CRTs.

    10. Re:Flat screens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point is? I think this is a great idea. There are lots of times when I don't want someone seeing what I am reading or writing on my computer/laptop.

    11. Re:Flat screens! by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs? I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle. Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.

      today YES. You are using old LCDs with Samsung PVA panels. Great angles on those. Today almost EVERYTHING is TN and sucks. Only top of the line stuff at 2-3x the price is SPVA/SMVA/SIPS.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    12. Re:Flat screens! by spydir31 · · Score: 1

      You can get an E-IPS panel, I recently got me a Dell 2209WA screen, was fairly cheap.

    13. Re:Flat screens! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology. I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops. All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's.

      Try some newer models.

      I'm sitting in front of an Acer 23" LCD with a contrast of 40000:1, with 160 degree horizontal and 160 degree vertical viewing angles, and a 5ms response time.

      It's a pretty sweet monitor, and doesn't suffer from much of what you decry. It also runs natively at 1920x1080.

      Acer X233H is the model number. Absolutely the best flat panel I've ever seen.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Flat screens! by Mozk · · Score: 1

      My company does visual effects too, so the color-shifting effect is really frustrating for the artists.

      You're damn right it is! Sometimes I can't tell whether something has a gradient or if it's just the monitor. And light grey (say #eee) appears lighter than white (#fff) when viewed from above at say a 20 degree angle. Other shades appear cyan at vertical angles and red at horizontal angles.

      --
      No existe.
  2. Ok? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what happens when you are typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat? Will the gaze thingy be able to follow or will you pass in and out of it's "verified" zone?

    Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos. Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Ok? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat

      Exactly! This is gonna be a big problem for Stevie Wonder - oh wait...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Ok? by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      -Gaze- tracking, not head tracking.

      It's watching your pupils, not your whole head.

      --
      Porquoi?
    3. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the parent said, if your head is moving, that means your gaze is moving as well. Is it gaze tracking going to be able to track the movements of your head, i.e. the movements of our eyes going from side to side.

    4. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, could you help me find the bug in my code?"

      "Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish."

    5. Re:Ok? by memnock · · Score: 1

      what if i've perfected sleeping with my head up and eyes up at my desk to fool my boss? how does it identify the dull gaze?

    6. Re:Ok? by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a major government application. Could you imagine someone in a position to read a top secret document bopping along as they read? Then again. How hard is it to keep your head still while you read a document while listening to music? This is a non-issue.

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    7. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a commercial product that does precisely this from a company called (I think) Occulus systems that works with MS office. Rather than blurring, it swaps out words except where you are looking. Very cool.

    8. Re:Ok? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > This is a non-issue.

      I know people for whom it would be serious issue if they were literate enough to read anything more complex than a stop sign. Some of them are managers.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:Ok? by True+Vox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you mean this: http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm If so... then you might consider RTFA... as this is who they're talking about lol.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    10. Re:Ok? by Starlon · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a fellow student in one of my programming classes. I was working on my homework in the computer lab, left to use the restroom, came back and got back to work. Shortly after the other student asked if I could help him with his homework. I took one look at it and I knew without a doubt it was my homework, which he had mutilated in an attempt to make it his own (gibberish). Needless to say, I grabbed my things and went straight to the CS department's chair about the issue. If he hadn't asked for help, he and I both would have been dinged for plagiarism. I don't know what happened with the other student. He continued attending classes, so it must not have been too bad. I asked that he not be punished for it.

      --
      Health Freedom is almost as popular as Freedom itself.
    11. Re:Ok? by Annorax · · Score: 1

      This works until someone makes a mask of your face, puts it on, and then browses your bank account information.

      Worse yet, someone cuts off your head and props it up on your joystick while they browse...

      I prefer the idea of measuring something that isn't so easily duplicated like gaze-tracking!

    12. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to use sunglasses while at the computer because I'm cool, will it work for me?

    13. Re:Ok? by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1

      "Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish."

      People have been saying that to me for years, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Ok? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos. Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.

      You have 10 seconds to comply ... :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Just like the Matrix! by MBCook · · Score: 1

    That sounds pretty cool, it would be a bit like "reading" the matrix. I guess you would get over the distraction of text you're not looking at turning into garbage and start to tune it out.

    Does anyone know of a video of this software in action, I'd love to see what it looks like.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Just like the Matrix! by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      I don't even see the code anymore, all I see are blondes, brunettes, redheads...

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    2. Re:Just like the Matrix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even see the code anymore, all I see are blondes, brunettes, redheads...

      That's funny, all I see are trees, goats, nazis...

    3. Re:Just like the Matrix! by canonymous · · Score: 1

      I don't even see the code anymore, all I see are blondes, brunettes, redheads...

      That's what happens when you stop using Lynx as your porn browser!

  4. misread headline by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1

    am I the only one that did a double take thinking we were geezer-tracking?

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    1. Re:misread headline by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      am I the only one that did a double take thinking we were geezer-tracking?

      Why would you do a double-take? We ARE geezer-tracking.

      Furthermore, how did you continue to read the title/summary if you did a double-take? Wouldn't that have thrown off your gaze-tracking security software and scrambled the page for you?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  5. No need to recognize gaze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I need is software that will recognize the approach of the boss -- easily discernible by his pointy hair.

  6. or you can just add a privacy screen by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I don't know. Just seems simpler to me.

    Perhaps this technology might be useful elsewhere.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you actually, say, worked with a privacy screen? The ones which have been foisted upon me suck. That and, oh, yeah, they don't work with laptops. However, an even sweeter rendition would be focus follows gaze, particularly for X11 and the random desktop environments. Then instead of wiggling the mouse every time I switch screens, I could just type where I'm looking. Obviously, it should hold the focus and let me keep typing if I'm still typing when I look away.

    2. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3Ms work fine with laptops.

    3. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do they include a free cone of silence as well?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Look away where? Off the screen? elsewhere on the screen? What happens when you're reading reference docs and typing code at the same time? It's a neat idea but there are some edge cases that will be really frustrating if you don't handle them properly. I'm frequently looking at other things on my screen and I only rarely want them to have focus.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    5. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by fizzding · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an actual use for the CAPSLOCK key to me... A simple toggle switch to turn focus tracking on or off.

    6. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Do they include a free cone of silence as well?

      No, but feel free to make yourself a Cone of Shame. :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. Anywhere you look will be visible. There is no edge-case.

  7. Technology vs People Problems by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your workers are handling sensitive material maybe you shouldn't have them in a cubicle with their back to the entrance.

    1. Re:Technology vs People Problems by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Yes. And they should never be on an airplane and try to get work done, or in a coffee shop, or anything like that. I mean, it's never critical to send an email before the deadline, is it?

      Hell... what if you just want to read some shitty porn or do your taxes or banking or something and don't want people shoulder surfing? Isn't that a good enough reason to protect your privacy?

    2. Re:Technology vs People Problems by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. With their back to the large windows we can spy on him much better.

      Sincerely,

      your competition.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Technology vs People Problems by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, if they're working on sensitive material, they should never work on an airplane or in a coffee shop. This has been known for a long time by people who work with sensitive material on paper. You don't get it out in a public area, and you don't talk about it in a public place. Nor do you rely on odd technological measures that might fail.

      The other reasons make a good deal more sense, but I don't know that it's worth the price and inconvenience just to read porn in public or do your taxes.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. oh, it's "gaze" tracking by erg5hp · · Score: 2, Funny

    thought they were picking on Clay and the boys . . .

  9. OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text! by S7urm · · Score: 1

    Just kidding

    I think this is actually going to be a REALLY big deal. Especially if they can prove that the eye signatures are truly one of a kind in regards to individuals specific patterns. If this is along the same vain as fingerprints in relation to scarcity, then you may now be reading of what could eventually make things like the need for encryption, or even some forms of basic information security obsolete. That is a BIG frickin deal, and may in fact be of such importance that you may see security/encryption companies try to squash this before it could ever become something more than just an idea.

    I think this is definetly something worth keeping an eye on (sorry for the pun)

    --
    "This is the value of a summer spent and a winter earned"
  10. more inexpensive solution by davek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98. Can't work without it.

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/

    --
    6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
    1. Re:more inexpensive solution by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do know that if you go to an auto parts store you can get almost the exact same thing for a hell of a lot less don't you?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:more inexpensive solution by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      But the one from the autoparts store doesn't say C.H.I.M.P. on it. So this one is WAY cooler.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    3. Re:more inexpensive solution by ScoLgo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Resurrect the Cult of VI"

      I don't get it. Is this 'VI' you refer to some minor demon that is 0.009009 as evil as the beast?

      Oh, what's that? You're not 'Roman' Catholic?

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    4. Re:more inexpensive solution by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98. Can't work without it.

      I use a clear piece of plastic, like half of a CD case with the insert removed. Stick it on a shelf near the monitor and with the right angle it is just as good for detecting someone behind your back, but since it is not an obvious mirror, they won't know that you know they are there. I've freaked out a number of people with my 'psychic' ability to detect someone standing at the door to my office while looking the other way and with the music blasting on my headphones.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:more inexpensive solution by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Start telling them "i can smell your ass-breath".

      On the general topic, just re-arrange your office to make the desk face the door. Or, maybe, don't do crap at work that you can't have other people see.

  11. Gaze-Tracking Software by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This gaze-tracking software will hurt the US military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy.

    1. Re:Gaze-Tracking Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:
       

      The goatse image is flashed subliminally on the screen several times per second. Extreme attentiveness to the screen indicates the presence of teh gaze.

  12. I smell venture capital PR by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful
    TFA's description of the technology contains a bit of hand-waving:

    Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes

    Check, that's doable now.

    to show only that one person the correct text.

    How? Elfin magic? If a screen region under the "authorized reader's" field of view is displaying the protected content to the authorized reader, it's also displaying exactly the same thing to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.

    So far as I can tell, this is the part of the proof labeled "Magic happens here". Also known as the part of the technology that needs more investment. So invest now!

    Where's my flying car, dammit?

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:I smell venture capital PR by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      it's also displaying exactly the same thing to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.

      That's why it pops up a screen alerting you that it sees another pair of eyes behind you as you are reading.

      This prevents other people from looking at your monitor while you are away, not while you are there reading it.

      And I only read the summary. :)

    2. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Read the part where it shows random text everywhere else. It's probably just meant to buy you time to tell any shoulder-surfers to fuck off.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    3. Re:I smell venture capital PR by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      I guess the important part of your argument is "to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area."

      Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at. Plus, if you moved your eyes at all, the unauthorized viewer would have to figure out which new point on the screen to watch. Because of this, it would be extremely difficult (although not impossible) for anyone to figure out exactly what you were reading unless they were standing right over your shoulder.

      Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    4. Re:I smell venture capital PR by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Ignore my comment. I only read the bottom of the summary. Oops. :P ;)

    5. Re:I smell venture capital PR by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      and if I'm looking at boobies, it will show constantly changing, random boobies, so it would difficult for someone approaching the screen to figure out exactly which boobies on the screen I was looking at.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    6. Re:I smell venture capital PR by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at.

      Not that difficult, if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds. Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter... i.e., anything not obviously random. Humans are damn good at pattern recognition. Moreso, if the shoulder-surfer has some idea what he's looking for, and the "authorized reader" is unaware he's being monitored. And don't deny that can happen. Anyone capable of concentrating sufficiently to work well is going to lose some environmental awareness, and a sufficiently sneaky voyeur would be able to benefit from that.

      Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen

      Yup. This smells like a solution looking to shoulder out existing and simpler solutions.

      Paradoxically, the "consumer-grade" idea in TFA actually seems more valuable: The display is normal, but when your eyes leave it the whole thing blanks. This helps solve the very-real and not-well-solved problem of leaving terminals unattended.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:I smell venture capital PR by hacksoncode · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It doesn't say specifically, but I'm guessing it makes use of the saccade effect. Your brain literally doesn't see changes in the visual field while your eyes are moving from one spot to another (this motion is called a saccade).

      So, basically, the text is only "correct" in the exact spot you're looking at any instant... as soon as your eyes move to the next word, the gibberish that's there before the saccade is changed to the "correct" word for that new spot. And you don't notice.

      Anyone that the camera is not tracking would just see random gibberish because the words they are looking at usually haven't been changed to be the "correct" ones for that spot at the instant they are looking at them.

      It's a well known process... just never applied to the field of security before. Also, it would take a very high-speed, very high-resolution camera, so I doubt it's applicability to general purpose computers any time soon.

      And, of course, if someone watching you has the same high-speed, high-resolution camera that you have, they could just record the whole video stream and perform an analysis on it... so it's not terribly good security either.

    8. Re:I smell venture capital PR by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes... "Check, that's doable now."

      Well, sort of. A decent eye tracker (example 1, example 2) costs $15,000 to $30,000 (please do not request a link to a price quote - the fact that they don't list prices on their pages should be a good clue). And this scrambling system would be worse than useless with a bad eye tracker. (PS, please, please prove me wrong by posting a link to a cheap, robust, accurate eye-tracking solution!)

    9. Re:I smell venture capital PR by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I can't even read on a normal screen at the same speed as my wife when we're both reading some quote site or something on the same screen... one of us is always slower or faster. This would be damn near impossible to figure out.

    10. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      and if I'm looking at boobies, it will show constantly changing, random boobies, so it would difficult for someone approaching the screen to figure out exactly which boobies on the screen I was looking at.

      My eyes are up here!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem will be when someone applies this to force the focused eyes to look at an advertisement (and probably also the real goal of the research, not some semi-useful shoulder-security application).

    12. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check their webpage on "Chameleon" (not "Private eye") - it shows how "magic" works.
      It displays proper information only where one person is looking, and gibberish around it.

      To be honest, looking at an example shown on their webpage, you can decipher. If you look long enough at each word, it _will_ be displayed in clear. Then you can move to the next word. Sure, it is much slower reading than normal, but you can still see what is on screen.

    13. Re:I smell venture capital PR by swilver · · Score: 1

      GIF anims stuck in side bars when TRYING to read an article are so annoying for me that I've got any form of animation turned off. I think I would notice if text started changing the whole time. Periferal vision is highly attuned to seeing changes/movement, although you can't tell exactly what until you focus on it again.

    14. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched the video on their website. Not the case... it litterally maps your face to determine if you are looking at the screen. When you look away the entire screen is changed or blured. This does not appear to use any type of advanced methods to hide data from prying eyes if you are reading the screen at the time.

    15. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds. Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter... i.e., anything not obviously random. Humans are damn good at pattern recognition.

      Actually, it works pretty well. You think your eyes are moving in a steady motion along the sentences, but they are actually flitting all over the place in unpredictable ways. How do I know it works well, you ask? Because I saw a demonstration of exactly this system in the 1990's. It used a standard text-only 80x24 display, and you had to wear a head-mounted gaze-tracker, but the wearer barely noticed that the screen wasn't completely normal, and the person looking over his shoulder could make no sense of the display at all. Worked like magic.

    16. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a demo of this software one time. It actually works really well for what it's supposed to do, we just had no real need for it. When they pitch it, they explain how it works a lot better, and they really know their stuff about how your eyes work. The downside was, I think it was just some plugins for Word and Excel (there could have been others that I'm not remembering too). It would replace all the words outside of where you were looking with random words that fit (approximately) the length, the part of speech and capitalization of the original words. Everything was changing regularly so there is no time to find a "pattern", especially as all of the text was mostly grammatical, but completely non-sensical. With Excel it would even put in fake numeric data and change the units. Pretty cool stuff, but I just don't see too many people with a need for it.

    17. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why go as far as eye tracking for that though? It would be way cheaper/easier to just use a bluetooth dongle and lock the screen when it goes out of range.

  13. demo? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to see a link for a demo (no pun intended). Anyone able to help, pls?

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
    1. Re:demo? by ChartBoy · · Score: 1

      The flash on the product page includes a demo. Click on "oculis in action" and move the mouse over the text.

      The big cursor is rather distracting though.

  14. It's an automatic "Boss" key!! by thewils · · Score: 5, Funny

    I could have used this when I was playing Prince of Persia on one of my previous contracts!!!

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  15. Here's the Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Here's the Video by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What the... I could implement that in some hours in Linux. Just make a Compiz plugin, read the eye position from standard eye-tracking library, giving it images from the webcam API, and then blur the screen, as soon as the eyes move outside a specific range (with a configurable radius). A bit of tweaking for this perhaps, and we're good.

      On the other hand, if you want to read that, you just have to get behind him, or look trough the window, without him noticing.
      What you would do anyway, when wanting to read secrets. So this thing is worthless anyway too.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Here's the Video by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the "demonstrations" in the video are not only faked, but really unconvincingly faked. The only part which looks like it might be a genuine live demo is when they demonstrate that holding a hand over the webcam causes the software to activate, albeit with considerable lag. Pretty impressive technology!

  16. Password masking by Starlon · · Score: 1

    This could be the answer Nielsen is looking for.

    --
    Health Freedom is almost as popular as Freedom itself.
  17. Loony Bin by JobyOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now things really will wiggle around when I'm not looking right at them.

    How am I supposed to tell the difference between PrivateEye and gremlins?

    --
    Porquoi?
    1. Re:Loony Bin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to feed it after midnight

    2. Re:Loony Bin by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      ...or the halo/corona of a coming migraine....

      Ow.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  18. Read a story once... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 0

    Where a guy working for some TLA (three letter agency) was working out of a 'net cafe using a custom boot CD/DVD. The software on it would somehow figure out that there was someone else that could see his screen - gaze tracking, hax0ring the security cam in the establishment, etc - and throw up all sorts of porn. So to the waitress, etc. it seemed he was just a run of the mill perv...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:Read a story once... by slummy · · Score: 1

      hax0ring the security cam? so this "three letter" agent was able to infiltrate the CCTV and overlay some porn where his screen would be? I call bullshit.

    2. Re:Read a story once... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it also opened a socket through the CIP firewall?

  19. Eye strain by slummy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about eye strain from the constant blurring/clarification process?
    I would think a person using this technology would have to train themselves not to try and focus on an area of the screen that would normally be in focus until the "gaze" sensor figures out what they're trying to look at.

    1. Re:Eye strain by Drive42 · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's already been done. For nearly 25 years, I think (it's referenced in Dennett's "Elbow Room"). The computer can track the position of your pupils in relation to the screen, and since eye movement is made up of tiny ballistic trajectories, the computer can figure out where your focus is going to land next, and can "clear" the data at that point, and then "garbage" the data at the point that your eye is no longer looking at. People take in groups of symbols in chunks when they read and then hop over to the next bit and the computer can switch data faster than a person can notice, so the person who's reading the screen sees nothing but normality, while anyone who's looking over your shoulder (unless they had the exact same focus at the exact same time, which is incredibly unlikely) only sees gibberish.

      Note that it only works with text. I'm not sure it would work with any sort of non-text graphical information.

    2. Re:Eye strain by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      I think the key point about these types of programs is the assumptions that they can change the information on the screen faster than humans can read. Given Window's amazing reliability to jerk and spasm around, I wouldn't put too much stock in that assumption. This would become a very annoying program pretty quickly. Even very minor delays in the program would cause headaches (literally and figuratively) for the reader.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    3. Re:Eye strain by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely on how fast the machine reacts. If it goes faster than you can refocus (not out of the question), then you're good to go. If not, then it's pretty much a useless product. I really doubt that it'd be this far in development if it were completely useless.

    4. Re:Eye strain by cheros · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a demo version which always makes a me a bit suspicious. However, the private version is cheap, so rather than throw up assumptions that are based on thin air I'm going to buy a copy and see what it does.

      Who knows, it may actually do what it says, and I think the idea stacks up. Just don't know just how much processing power this will take, and Windows is pretty crap at whole screen manipulation but that's exactly what testing is for :-).

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  20. Re:OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    I have long thought that privacy is the next killer app.

  21. Just you wait... by dugrrr · · Score: 1

    ...it will be like the scramble suit from Philip K. Dick's "A Scanner Darkly", but for computer monitors.

    (ie. no one will know exactly what kind of porn your looking at)

  22. A better use for gaze tech by stokessd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Screw privacy, I want my window manager to focus the window I'm looking at. Now that would be useful.

    Sheldon

    1. Re:A better use for gaze tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... you use focus follows mouse, hmm?

    2. Re:A better use for gaze tech by dokebi · · Score: 1

      What happens when you are looking at text from one window and typing into a different window?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    3. Re:A better use for gaze tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like typing comments on slashdot without reading the article/summary, because I'm watching youtube videos in another window?

    4. Re:A better use for gaze tech by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      You click either a "lock" or a "disable" button.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    5. Re:A better use for gaze tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or selectively render higher levels of detail in 3D apps.

    6. Re:A better use for gaze tech by PopeAlien · · Score: 1

      Screw privacy

      ..They're still working on that, but you'll be glad to know things are progressing well.

  23. But excuse me by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    This means if I my monitor faces my cubicle entrance and my cubicle happens to be on the way to the bathroom or cafeteria then this software will totally screw my eyes.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  24. Clever, but probably impractical by russotto · · Score: 1

    Problem 1: Suppose the gaze-tracking works perfectly under static conditions (during training before the scrambling). Now the scramble kicks in and you've got crap changing all over the screen. You're going to notice that; it's going to be irritating. And when you catch something changing, you're going to look at it. Thus screwing up the algorithm.

    Problem 2: The algorithm isn't going to be 100% perfect. And it doesn't have to be camo far off to make melvin unreliable.

  25. Awesome! by kheldan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like an awesome development in the area of personal security alright -- especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work. Your boss or co-worker peers over the wall to try to catch you? No problem, it blurs the screen!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Awesome! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work.

      Careful there. What if your boss notices that only the guys in the porn flicks stay in focus, while the chicks are blurred...

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, that will work:

      BOSS: Are you looking at porn?!?!
      YOU: Uh, no. What would make you think that?
      BOSS: Your screen is blurred out but I can still tell it's a naked person!
      YOU: No way. I'm just editing a document with a peach colored background and red-ish purple text. Honest!

  26. More biometric nonsense! by syousef · · Score: 1

    Yet another piece of biometric technology that means if I'm having an off day, get a twitch in my eye etc. I get locked out of my own data. Yippee!!! Yay!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  27. Technology defeated by the Hamburger Pimp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. CRAP!! Next DMCA intrusion by eatvegetables · · Score: 5, Funny
    Crap! Soon we'll get T.V.s that know that their being watched, who is watching, and exactly what viewers are looking at. ...Coming soon to a T.V. near you.

    Viewer: (thinking to himself) Oh great, a commercial. Time for a potty break. la, la, la (walks away from T.V.)

    T.V.: (in loud voice) Alert, Alert, Alert. Viewer, you have been away from the television for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. You now risk violating your television and cable provider's ULA and risk violating section 5, paragraph 10, subsection a of the 2010 DMCA redux and expansion act.

    Viewer: Coming, coming...just have to give a quick shake....O.K., I'm here. Whew, that was close.

    T.V.: Alert, Alert, Alert!!

    Viewer: Wha!, I'm here. I'm watching again for God's sake.

    T.V.: Viewer, you twice failed to take visual notice of the coke can product placement in this episode of Friends. You have now violated your television and cable provider's ULA and thus also violated the aforementioned DCMA act. Please place your hands on your head and wait for the authorities to arrive....a little higher please...there you go.

    1. Re:CRAP!! Next DMCA intrusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you PLEASE stop giving ideas to BigBrother??? They're getting intrusive/obnoxious enough as it is, without eatvegetables doing their R&D for them.....

  29. Could be defeated by a camera by Jeff+Carr · · Score: 1

    This is really interesting, and would solve casual observing to a large extent, but I wouldn't consider it a high security solution as it could be fairly trivially defeated by a video camera.

    I could see where it could be useful for a doctor's office/hospital though to keep medical records secure, or a reception area to automatically screen out snoopers.

    --
    The television will not be revolutionized.
    1. Re:Could be defeated by a camera by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

      Or by, erm, I dunno, wearing a pair of dark glasses? And if the system can recognise shades then simply wear a pair of crazy Dame Edna Everage style dark-glasses!

  30. Overly difficult solution to an easy problem by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    Line-of-sight security is not difficult. just don't face the monitor to the door.

    If you're working on something that really is sensitive, then it's worth it to arrange for physical security.

  31. 2005 system used eye-contact for security (ACM) by ottffs · · Score: 1
    In this paper from the 2005 ACM UIST (http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/index.html) conference a system is described that knew when more than one set of eyes were looking at a screen and then tinting the screen red to indicate a possible breech of security. Moreover this system was implemented on a mobile device, thus placing it in public situations where unauthorized eyes were likely to be a problem.

    PAPER

    "eyeLook:Âusing attention to facilitate mobile media consumption" http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1095034.1095050&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=43353856&CFTOKEN=45571461

    ABSTRACT:

    One of the problems with mobile media devices is that they may distract users during critical everyday tasks, such as navigating the streets of a busy city. We addressed this issue in the design of eyeLook: a platform for attention sensitive mobile computing. eyeLook appliances use embedded low cost eyeCONTACT sensors (ECS) to detect when the user looks at the display. We discuss two eyeLook applications, seeTV and seeTXT, that facilitate courteous media consumption in mobile contexts by using the ECS to respond to user attention. seeTV is an attentive mobile video player that automatically pauses content when the user is not looking. seeTXT is an attentive speed reading application that flashes words on the display, advancing text only when the user is looking. By making mobile media devices sensitive to actual user attention, eyeLook allows applications to gracefully transition users between consuming media, and managing life.

  32. Be careful where you look! by Bladesonfire · · Score: 0

    Great, now my girlfriend is going to know I'm looking right at the pictures of those "singles" ads when that image is the only thing clear on a blurry screen.

  33. Re:OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Eye signatures? Doubtful. But it provides security once you've logged in. That's a fairly big deal itself.

  34. Re:OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text by WNight · · Score: 1

    Of course it's a password I'll be able to steal simply by watching you read.

  35. Uh-oh by brusk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sunglasses will be considered a DMCA violation.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
  36. Confusing web site by gonz · · Score: 1

    The web site doesn't clearly explain the difference between "Chameleon" versus "PrivateEye". I found the answers in this PDF:

    http://oculislabs.com/Oculis_Whitepaper_1.pdf

    It sounds like PrivateEye is the $19.95 edition for consumers using a simple web cam. Whereas Chameleon is the "high end" version using a special "Gazetracker" hardware device that probably has a much better reaction time. There's no price listing for Chameleon, i.e. it's intended for someone spending taxpayer's money rather than their own.

    The demo is on the Chameleon page:

    http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm

    It took me awhile to figure out that this "PROTECTING DATA IN USE" image is actually an interactive Flash applet. What you do is hover the mouse over "Oculus in Action", and then wait until a blue/red oval slides across the screen. After the oval disappears, you can use the mouse to bring it back on the screen and move it around. The text inside the oval is readable, everything outside is scrambled.

    The obscured text is pretty strange actually. On the "This is what the attacker sees" preview tab, the letters in each word are shuffled and easily deciphered. But on the "Oculus in Action" tab, they substitute random words of equal length, apparently sampled from a corpus of gay Satanic rites:

    States --> Yapper
    Government --> Satanology
    degree --> faerie
    classifies --> spermatova
    determine --> doohinkus
    classifying --> luciferidae

    (No joke, these are real excerpts!)

    From moving the oval around and trying to read what's inside, it's pretty apparent that reaction time is extremely important to the usability of this product. Since there's no downloadable demo program (and a whole lot of marketing patter), I'm guessing that PrivateEye is way too sluggish to be practical. Chameleon might be usable, but you probably have to pay full price to find that out as well heheh.

    -Gonz

  37. TEMPEST shines on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need a simple, open source solution for blocking TEMPEST.

    Zero Pad Emission software is free but old and proprietary for Windows (works under Wine). I use it for opening up my passwords lists within my TrueCrypt partitions and containers, but I have no way to know if it really works or not.

    Once a simple, open source solution is worked out, it can be something applied to every application, why not in X/org itself?

    Blurring the screen may work for local peeping toms in and around the computer rooms, but when it is not blurred and visible, it can be compromised.

  38. Example screen - Only you can see this... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&* SCREW YOU THIS IS PRIVATE fnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&BOXDT&*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&*^&*%HJGFYR%^#TJFTFYFB&^%E^$VFBUFB&*^%%(BITKN*O%^^*%V YDDHFU^&^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&T&*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  39. Another DRM by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    And now it's not a joke.

  40. point your monitor away from your door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duh

  41. New marketing avenue? by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    I can see the advertizing world jumping onboard this one, proposing new ad revenue models where an ad pays the website (or network) as long as the viewers are actually looking at the ad, rather than the page just being up or the channel turned on. Big corporations are probably starting to be fed up paying huge chunks of cash just so people without DVRs can get bathroom breaks without missing a single second of Lost or Monday Night Football.

  42. Does it actually recognize you? by Briden · · Score: 1

    Does it know exactly what *you* look like? if not, when you go for lunch and someone else sits down, does it just show them the same thing you'd see?

    Article, website, nor video mentions facial recognition, only gaze tracking. he literally waves his hand over the webcam to make it switch the screen, which all switches at once. lame! I don't see any useful security application for this at all, though the technology of gaze tracing is neat, especially the expensive stuff linked above.

    make my mouse pointer go where i look and i'll be impressed.

    whats wrong with using CTRL+ALT+DELETE, ENTER to lock your box?

  43. Gays tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're gonna be soOOOooOOoo pissed :)

    Expect melodramatic sighs.

  44. What if by jeevan · · Score: 1

    ... & what if someone just uses a camera
    without facing the monitor at all?

    He could then quickly continue to the cafeteria & check the image, no prob


    Now there's a feature-hole for you

  45. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a pirate with an eye patch. Will it work for me?

  46. Unlikely by nixdroid · · Score: 0

    I don't see how this could ever possib@#$%&*@!!!!#$*(-:''.9>^?#?@:&?(+$@(?}*^|?%#@!|{}(*&?^)"}>*>%#

    --
    -- Consensus - 50% probability that the majority are wrong.
  47. xkcd predicted it by cybercobra · · Score: 1