Sperm Travels Faster Toward Attractive Females
A new study has shown that even sperm can be superficial. Researchers found that males of many animal species, including humans, can adjust the speed and effectiveness of their sperm by regulating the amount of seminal fluid they produce during copulation. The determining factor on that amount of fluid seems to be whether the male finds the female attractive.
I've actually done some research on this aswell. On majority of times when I found a good clip, I had to clean my monitor. This didn't happen when the clip was bad or the women on it unattractive. Hmm, wonder where they sell speedometers...
If she was not attractive, why would he even be in there? Unless of course it is right after the bars close.
Oh wait . . .
Bars = alcohol
alcohol = drunk
ugly girls = cute girls
Now I've got it.
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
I, for one, find their statistics sub-par and wish to volunteer my services for further study into the effect of having sex with attractive females on sperm behaviour.
Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
... I can see a problem with this study if applying it's conclusions to people. I imagine the amount of sperm has to do more with being extremely turned on and not just attractiveness, you can be with a beautiful girl and not be that turned on because you don't get along that well, and you can be with an average girl who you connect with on a fundamental level that turns you on way more then the prettier girl.
The best part of this article is the tag "!newsfornerds".
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
You would think so, considering thats only what the sperm sees.
HE SCORES!
Or vice versa, if I read the article correctly...
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
This article was pretty interesting; for example the possible link between this and fertility rates. If there is indeed a link, it's going to come as a slap to the face for some couples having trouble. I also found it pretty interesting that sperm quality can be improved by daily masturbation.
"My crime is that of curiosity."
Combined with this research, which shows that ugly men release more sperm, the chance of conception appears to be highest when a stunningly attractive woman sleeps with an truly ugly man. Somebody please think of the children.
Despite the misleading headline, they say that males seem to be able to adjust -- most likely related to level of hormones or arousal.
Nobody is suggesting the sperm "know" anything, merely that the human glandular system is complex, and this is another example. :-P
Cheers
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Or, more accurately in this case, red junglefowl. :-P
Cheers
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Yeah, and? It's also been established that other male mammals, including humans, can reply with something call semen displacement (circumsized males need not apply, some restrictions may apply, see mate for full rules and details) Women aren't without their biological defenses either; Concealing ovulation, various vaginal defenses, such as lack of secretions leading to a lower likelihood of fertility, etc., etc.
But really people, is it so freaking hard to just take us out to dinner, kiss our neck afterwords in an intimate and quiet environment, and actually DO the foreplay (and for those in longer-term relationships, not have it become formulaic?) Because if the sex sucks, it isn't going to matter how much scientific knowledge you have about the mating process -- it doesn't change the fact that it will still end in tears for you! *mutters* They can tell me down to the molecular level how conception works, but they can't even get the damn condom out of the wrapper and a bra off without completely ruining it...
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Don't worry, I don't need to pull out because you're ugly.
That is, if you are a 13 year old "virgin".
in the animal kingdom and in humans, you need to talk about testicle size
testicle size is a very good indicator of how monogamous females are. for example, chimpanzee females are very promiscuous. therefore, male chimpanzees have huge testicles. why? well, if the idea is you have to leave some offspring in this world, the only valid route you can take to ensure that with promiscuous females is to have a huge ejaculate load, to literally flood out competing males' sperm
it follows then that attractive females, with more frequent mating possibilities, require more "output" to ensure your reproductive success. so, biologically, it may not be a matter of aesthetic pleasure leading to greater sperm volume, but simply a matter of fear: you need to dump a huge load to make sure your sperm outcompetes all the other mating opportunities an attractive female can command
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
I really hope they're not projecting their own feelings and biases into the equation here. For this experiment to have any scientific value, there must be an objective measure of attractiveness, one with a proper definition and units (including a calibration standard). Can someone please tell me, for humans, what this measurement is based on, what the units are (Helens? the amount of beauty required to launch 1000 ships - but beauty is not attractiveness) and, most important, who the calibration reference is?
Men need to know.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
...drink until she's cute, but stop before the wedding.
Does the article posting mean this in a topological meaning? :-)
I take that to mean on the chest and face. (.Y.)
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
Please do not end a conversation about sperm and human glands with the word "Cheers!"
That is all.
"Males may alter the velocity of sperm they allocate to copulations by strategically firing their left and right ejaculatory ducts, which can operate independently," they explained.
"I know what you're thinking. 'Did he fire one ejaculatory duct or two?' Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya?"
It took me three tries to realize you weren't being literal.
5. Female