Slashdot Mirror


Digsby IM Client Quietly Installs Badware

An anonymous reader writes "IM company Digsby has quietly included malware in an update to their client software that utilizes users' computing power and bandwidth while idle for a quick buck. When questioned, developers at Digsby claim that they have done no wrong and that users should not complain because the client software is 'free.'" The money-making distributed computing software is in addition to six "crapware" apps that users must refuse during installation. The terms of service that no one ever reads does describe the CPU- and bandwidth-robbing moneymaker, and its off switch is located behind the "Support Digsby" menu item.

11 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Free or not... by netruner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free or not, hiding (or not mentioning it, or putting it in the .000001 point fine print, or burying it in a 100 page EULA - IOW: obscuring the truth) something that you know people will object to is deceptive, dishonest and wrong. You have to ask yourself, would people not install my "free" software if they knew what it was doing - if the answer is anywhere close to yes, you have a moral obligation to reveal the details.

    This is part of the bargain - if you give away something for "free" and advertise it as "free", it needs to be "free" - as in not just that the costs are hidden. Otherwise, it really is a Trojan Horse.

    Don't reap the goodwill of the public when you're secretly using them.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
  2. Re:Nuisance of free software by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've paid for your software, you can usually [expect] that they wont fuck you over with that crap

    So why are there ads in some PC games that cost over fifty bucks to buy?

  3. It Would Be A Bad Thing by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... if someone were to hack the malware. It would be very bad if they changed it so it downloaded copyrighted stuff, say whole CDs of recent music, to Digsby's machines, and then sent email to RIAA saying it's there. It would be a very, very bad thing indeed if this were then redistributed and thousands of unsuspecting people installed it and remained unsuspecting as the usually do, while it did its job then erased itself, because otherwise it would have been a Simply Awful very, very bad thing.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  4. Re:Use Pidgin ... by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed, and in the meantime, let them know why nobody is going to use their IM Client anymore.

    bugs@digsby.com

    http://forum.digsby.com/

  5. Badware? by RaceProUK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know in computing it's fashionable to make up words, but badware? That's just crap. Besides, there's already a suitable word: malware.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  6. users should not complain by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    users should not complain because the client software is 'free.'

    A malware spreader saying this is like a person who knowingly spreads HIV saying his victims shouldn't complain because they got sex for free. I was going to say "rapist" but digsby doesn't install via drive-by download.

  7. Re:Nuisance of free software by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bullshit, they'd cost the same as they ever did except they figured out they could add ads for just about nothing and increase their profit margins even more.

    If you really believe that in-game advertisements subsidize the cost of games then you really are ignorant.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  8. Re:N ot free by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Laptop users also get less battery life.

  9. Re:Due diligence by The+Moof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe. If the contract is intentionally written in such a way that no layman can understand it and it's designed to take advantage of you, there is a valid argument against the company (IANAL, but people keep telling me this is true).

    And, as one person who replied to you also pointed out, if this was done via an automatic update without you clicking through to agree with a new EULA stating this, they're in trouble.

  10. Re:Nuisance of free software by qoncept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless you've done the market research, studied the budgets of the developers, guaged the economy, researched the public willingness to buy games that have ads, and considered inflation and any number of other factors, your opinion is worth about as much as anyone else's. Acting like it's so blatantly obvious that your opinion is better than his doesn't put you in a very good light.

    --
    Whale
  11. Re:Terms of Service by bluesatin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people do you know that actually ready the TOS before they purchase the product?

    How many products do you know, that have a TOS you can read before purchasing?