Slashdot Mirror


Netscape Founder Backs New Browser

wirelessjb writes to share that after a resounding defeat at the hands of Microsoft in the first major browser war of the mid 1990s, Marc Andreessen is looking to have another go at the market by backing a new startup called "RockMelt." "Mr. Andreessen suggested the new browser would be different, saying that most other browsers had not kept pace with the evolution of the Web, which had grown from an array of static Web pages into a network of complex Web sites and applications. 'There are all kinds of things that you would do differently if you are building a browser from scratch,' Mr. Andreessen said. RockMelt was co-founded by Eric Vishria and Tim Howes, both former executives at Opsware, a company that Mr. Andreessen co-founded and then sold to Hewlett-Packard in 2007 for about $1.6 billion. Mr. Howes also worked at Netscape with Mr. Andreessen."

60 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. May I say by chebucto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Netscape's interface was the best

    Long live Seamonkey

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    1. Re:May I say by TrancePhreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget to mention that Netscape started to kill itself! Bloated and buggy.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    2. Re:May I say by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, that's German for, 'The Seamonkey, The.'
       
      No one who speaks German could be an evil man.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  2. Chrome 2 by mdf356 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'There are all kinds of things that you would do differently if you are building a browser from scratch,' Mr. Andreessen said.

    Yeah, I'd build a browser more like... Chrome. Which addressed this issue less than two years ago. Has the web changed a lot in two years?

    What's the profit model for this startup? That's the most interesting question, to me.

    --
    Terrorist, bomb, al Qaeda, nuclear, yellowcake, kill, assassinate. Carnivore is dead... long live Echelon.
    1. Re:Chrome 2 by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 3, Funny

      I imagine Marc Andreessen has enough change in his sofa cushions to keep a startup going for decades.

    2. Re:Chrome 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's the profit model for this startup? That's the most interesting question, to me.

      According to the various articles, RockMelt will attempt strong integration with social networking sites. So I would assume the profit model is mining users' privacy and selling advertising.

    3. Re:Chrome 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally! I hate having to download all that spyware myself.

    4. Re:Chrome 2 by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ..its about the changes under the hood!

      Yet the user's experience is only little refined because of it.

      I don't want to knock that; believe me, I have enough problems with Firefox on Linux because of the lack of separation between the tabs that I can't wait for when Chrome has a decent Linux build. From what it sounds that this guy wants to do, it sounds like he doesn't want behind the scenes changes, he wants to revamp the user experience. (Whether or not this browser will, or will in a good way, we'll have to wait to see.)

    5. Re:Chrome 2 by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your mind is not able to think very far, is it? Like those Star Trek "aliens"*. Or "new and innovative" car models that look *freakin exactly* like the old ones, so you have to look twice to even see the difference!

      It's so very common that I see people coming up with things that they call great innovative thinking, and I can show them multiple boxes and outdated philosophies that they still think inside of, on the spot.

      Chrome is still showing HTML pages in tabs that you navigate trough with the virtual interface of links, a history to move through, etc, and a physical interface of the mouse and keyboard. In a window. With no new widgets, concepts, philosophies, or anything new of any kind. And we're not talking about two years. We're talking about time span since Mosaic 1.0 in 1993. Because other than the Addons or Firefox and Greasemonkey, pretty much nothing innovative in browsers has appeared or changed since then. (Maybe Flock was an approach. But it was a half-assed one, and failed because of that.)

      ___
      * I really liked the show, but I hated what they called extraterrestrial, including the "explanation".

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Chrome 2 by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who are the people proposing this and do they not understand the "plug-in" concept as demonstrated in most browsers, but especially well in Firefox? Firefox offers such extensive addon customization that one wonders what more could possibly be done with a new browser rather than simply writing an addon? Why should strong social network integration be "built in" to the browser anyway? That is what addons are for. This sounds like the sort of idea that a business person, who had little or no knowledge of software engineering, would propose. What is surprising is that someone like Marc would fall for it. As for the investors in this startup, well, "the fools and their money will soon be parted company"; perhaps that is what Marc intends to do from the start, separate foolish investors from their money.

    7. Re:Chrome 2 by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      So how bout you drop some of that wisdom on us Merlin, instead of just fucking telling us we are stupid.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Chrome 2 by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chrome is still showing HTML pages in tabs that you navigate trough with the virtual interface of links, a history to move through, etc, and a physical interface of the mouse and keyboard. In a window.

      Ha! So true! Those hidebound sheep, still using HTML (instead of XIEJD), tabs (instead of buckets), links (instead of jellybeans), history (instead of triple-reverse history), a physical mouse/keyboard interface (instead of magnetic-induction frontal-cortex implants). In windows (instead of architectural glass blocks)! They really should get with the times.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    9. Re:Chrome 2 by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly my thoughts.

      Chrome has a fast JS engine. It separates plug-ins so they can't crash the browser. The interface doesn't get in your way. It sandboxes everything for security. It integrates Gears to use web apps offline.

      What is this start-up going to do that Chrome doesn't do?

      I haven't read the article, but if I was going with a start-up today, I'd build around Chromium to start, but port it to Qt to use one code-base on all platforms. With the per-process design, you could even call different versions of the rendering engine for different pages/sites, which would be useful for compatibility, and for web design. I'd automatically sync the browser profile online so you have the same settings anywhere you sit down, unless you want to opt-out for privacy concerns. I'd work on a notification system like this: http://blog.abi.sh/2009/silent-diving-seagulls/ I'd jump all over HTML 5, and I'd form strategic partnerships to pre-bundle certain web-apps into the browser for revenue.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    10. Re:Chrome 2 by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flock already integrates with social networking sites. IE8 does this as well.

      I think you're correct that the point of RockMelt is to monetize this.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Chrome 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's saying the Chrome interface is nothing innovative. It's an accurate observation. Just because he made the observation doesn't mean he's supposed to have answers on how to innovate a browser interface.

    12. Re:Chrome 2 by lena_10326 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Brainstorming a little bit... some advantages could be:
      • Creating a distinct unambiguous brand name. It's harder to do that if you're piggy backing on Firefox which has it's own brand name.
      • Andreessen's position in the industry brings notability so it'll be newsworthy (news articles = free advertising). His expertise is with browsers, so I imagine leveraging his name is more congruent with a new browser rather than a new browser plugin.
      • They believe a plugin is a harder sell because there could be less perceived value in a product that sports conceptual features described in the language of business-speak. Language such as social networking, advertisement engine, productivity tools, website integration, bridge software, blah blah blah; as opposed to Flash which has concrete, visible animation features. Everyone knows what a browser is, so it's conceptually more concrete. It has an installation program, desktop icon, application window, and title bar.
      • Maybe they feel the concept of "browser" is a hot topic at the moment (due to Firefox and Chrome) and they want to ride the wave. "plugin" isn't so desirable anymore because it recalls the legacy of the 1990's: implying old, "been there, done that", ho-hum, ancient.
      • Maybe they feel owning their own browser platform lends more technical credibility over owning a browser plugin because the technical challenge is greater. Technical credibility could translate to bu$ine$$ credibility.
      • Maybe they want control of proprietary source code, so it'll obfuscate the plan to spam the hell out---err, I mean--provide useful related links to web queries.
      • Maybe they want full control of the browser in order to make good on business partner contracts. It's harder to make those guarantees when disinterested 3rd party plugins can disable or intercept your plugin with very little effort.
      • Maybe they want control of the installation base in order to directly sell plugin access or communication channels--as opposed to rev sharing with 3rd parties (such as google).
      • Maybe they plan to build and sell in order to be accumulated by another business. They'll need a flagship product and user database to do that.
      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  3. You hear that Mr. Andreessen? by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... That is the sound of inevitability... It is the sound of your death... Goodbye, Mr. Andreessen...

    Marc: My name... is RockMelt!

    1. Re:You hear that Mr. Andreessen? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep and it will feature a new scripting language called LavaScript.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  4. The web site appears to have melted by JSG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Rockmelt website isn't too interesting. It's a bit presumptuous to assume it will get a /.ing. Perhaps it is suffering from the Marketing Dept assuming people will come back later in the hope of revelation, rather than them saying "ooh nice logo" and then instantly forgetting about them and moving along.

    1. Re:The web site appears to have melted by JSG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bad juju replying to my own post but this is just a product placement ad. There is no substance whatsoever about what is actually different with this browser. There are no details either in either of the links. Surely money changed hands to put this drivel on /.

    2. Re:The web site appears to have melted by bertoelcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given your UID I would hope you have heard of these, they are called "slashvertisements".

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  5. Chrome 0 by argent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd build a browser more like... Chrome.

    I wouldn't. I'd dump most of the custom GUI features in Chrome and Firefox, and quit screwing around with the stuff around the browser window. It's the stuff inside the browser window that you actually care about, not whether the icons are grey metal or jello blue.

    1. Re:Chrome 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean completely useless and pointless things around the content like favorite & history menus and tabs too, right? I wish people would quit wasting time coming up with that nonsense and get back to the 'stuff inside the browser window'...

      I'll even go back to your themes point and argue that. As hard as it is for the common /.er to process, we are humans and not machines. People love their colors and themes. When my mom, grandmother, uncle and other aunt got a new computer, I got the inevitable "you work with computers, right" call and every single last one of them had in their top 5 "how to" questions: Can't I change the picture behind my icon thingies? How do I do that?

      Never underestimate the human desire to want to make their world their own. Even when they know they aren't.

    2. Re:Chrome 0 by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt anyone that uses Chrome cares about how it looks. The reason I use it is because it's as fast as Firefox 1.0 was. Now that Firefox 3.5 takes 30 seconds to start and crashes constantly (on Linux at least), I'd rather use a browser that's fast and stable (and yes, Chrome on Linux is still pre-alpha and it's more stable than Firefox).

    3. Re:Chrome 0 by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You work with computers, right? How do I set up my machine to display not "color", per se, but to be more visible for the "color blind". See, I fail all color vision tests - can't see red or green. I don't CARE about the colors so much, as I just want important stuff to be sharp and clear. (Why on earth does everyone use red to color "important shitzls", when red just fades into the backgroud? Use a nice electric blue - make it flash - THAT will get my attention!!)

      Alright, maybe I'm just mocking "normal" people. Whatever. But, it's fair to point out that eye candy isn't a priority with everyone. ;-)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Chrome 0 by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just colors. Work with a netbook and you'll learn to value minimized themes with tiny buttons and the ability to cram two toolbars in next to the menu bar. Netbooks put vertical real estate at a premium and anything that helps me reduce the browser chrome's vertical footprint dramatically improves the browser's usefulness (from "useless" to "almost decent").

      Likewise, OSes that natively support theming (ur a UXTheme-hacked Windows) are a very good thing because every vertical pixel I can shave off the window decoration and widgets can mean the difference between a working app and one where the important buttons are offscreen. Interface customizability is very important right now.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Chrome 0 by bigdavex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean completely useless and pointless things around the content like favorite & history menus and tabs too, right?

      I personally think a UI for these things in any way different than a web page of links is silly. If we can come up with a better way of navigating links to web pages, then the rest of the web should work that way, too.

      --
      -Dave
    6. Re:Chrome 0 by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Mozilla devs seem to give the Linux version of Firefox very little love. I've been secretly hoping for a Qt version of Firefox for ages, which supposedly Nokia was working on. They said they did the bulk of the port in a month, but then it never seemed to finish/surface. But now there are browsers like rekonq and Arora which are very small, and extremely fast. Rekonq is eventually moving to a per-process design like Chrome, and integrates well with KDE.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:Chrome 0 by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also just pulled up Safari on Windows, and it uses the same number of elements as Firefox, and almost an identical UI.

      You have the menu-bar.

      Below that you have navigation links next to the address bar, and then the search bar. Below that is the bookmark menu (which I almost always turn off).

      Safari uses smaller icons than Firefox by default, but Firefox makes it easier to install a theme with smaller icons.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    8. Re:Chrome 0 by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you might want the high contrast inverse theme on GNOME. Not sure if the colors are right (not being color-blind myself) but it has good contrast.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:Chrome 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Red wouldn't fade into the background if you could see it. Red is such a frightening color because it's the color of blood, so every time you see it, it looks like something's bleeding a little. It's horrifying really. Be glad you can't see it.

    10. Re:Chrome 0 by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find KDE 3 to be my desktop of choice on netbooks because I have so much control over every theming aspect. I can get great functionality with pixel real estate being a premium.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  6. Silly Mr Andreessen by Galestar · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have a problem with authority, Mr. Andreessen. You believe that you are special, that somehow the rules do not apply to you. Obviously you are mistaken. The intrawebz is one of the most totally awesome things in the world because every single browser understands that they are part of a whole. Thus if a blag has a problem, the tubes have a problem. The time has come to make a choice, Mr. Andreessen. Either you choose to respect the tubes from this day forth or you choose to find yourself another industry. Do I make myself clear?

    --
    AccountKiller
  7. Tim Howes by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tim Howes is also the inventor of the LDAP Protocol, when he was a grad student at UMich studying DAP and DIT under X.500 of OSI fame.

    1. Re:Tim Howes by NNKK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, now I know which browser to avoid. Thanks for the warning!

  8. It looks like a browser, it smells like a browser by JamJam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That article was so light on on content all that we can summarize is that RockMelt is another browser. A browser with a creative name, that has a "browser rock star" who is backing it, and one that has some new "plug-in" features with Facebook. So why am I lacking any excitement by this? Correct me if I'm wrong but it's not like Andreessen is a Steve Job's visionary or anything.

  9. Its going to be off the hook! by doroshjt · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll have built in twitter and facebook access. Totally social networkitized

    1. Re:Its going to be off the hook! by doroshjt · · Score: 4, Funny

      You just don't get it, you'll be able to update and SEE your twitter feed and facebook page from your browser! No other browser lets you see facebook and twitter, its going to blow YOUR MIND!

    2. Re:Its going to be off the hook! by pinkj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well! Goodbye Gopher! Hello RockMelt! I'm gonna party like it's 1993!

  10. Keeping Pace with the Web by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What does he mean that most browsers aren't keeping pace with the web? By definition, browsers define the pace of the web. If your browser can't see it then it doesn't exist yet.

    There's no one out there making a good living by creating webpages that browsers can't display.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Keeping Pace with the Web by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's no one out there making a good living by creating webpages that browsers can't display.

      I thought that was the definition of an IE-centric web developer.

  11. Blink by jointm1k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell me Mr. Andreessen, what good is a new browser, if you are unable to . . . ?

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
  12. it better support Linux by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Funny

    or I am going to kick your ass!

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  13. not learning from history? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure someone already made Flock. :)

  14. Re:It looks like a browser, it smells like a brows by Itninja · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Little else is known about RockMelt, and Mr. Vishria was unwilling to discuss it. "We are at very early stages of development," Mr. Vishria said. "Talking about it at this stage is not useful."

    Good thing it was on Slashdot where nothing is useful.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  15. Re:It looks like a browser, it smells like a brows by JSG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This "article" is just another marketing ploy for some vapourware. Can't you see that? By gum, /. isn't the same these days 8) There are a couple of good jokes in this topic but in the end this is all just an exercise in promotion and we are it's semi willing participants, breathing life into the marketing machine.

    IT'S ALL JUST BOLLOCKS - I WANT NEWS ON MY /. NOT THIS SHIT.

  16. Man burns left hand on stove, will now try right by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just checked the date, I thought for sure it must be April 1st.

    Marc Andreessen is jumping into the browser wars again? What's next, Ford announces a "re-imagined" Edsel?

  17. Might be based on Chrome by voidvektor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did some digging around and found an e-mail to a google group from a guy settings up RockMelts site:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/scalr-discuss@googlegroups.com/msg02866.html
    The same guy asked questions on the Chromium mailing list, "helping a co-worker get the chromium src".
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/105e19e8d4f6c650?pli=1
    Probably nothing, but could be something...

  18. The Facebook requirement kills it for me by LionMage · · Score: 2

    Judging from what little was revealed in TFA, I guess RockMelt more or less requires you to have a Facebook account, and to use a Facebook login to access RockMelt's features. Talk about bundling! So rather than be an agnostic client agent to surf the web, RockMelt is going to serve as a portal to funnel you, the user, through a specific service before you get anywhere else. I'm sure Andreesen is also betting that this will funnel more dollars into his pockets, since he will create a more captive audience for his service.

    No thanks, not a fan of lock-in of any kind. Also not a fan of most social networking services, which is why I have avoided Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, et. al.

  19. It seems... by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone has forgotten the first rule of Loudcloud.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  20. Re:It looks like a browser, it smells like a brows by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The big story here is Mr. Andreessen is backing a browser product, a market thought to be dead and buried in terms of profit. He was profiled in Forbes a while back and his name resonates with the financial types. He has credibility with investors because he called Facebook and Twitter (among others) as a buy pretty early in their lifecycles. Corollary, the Forbes article mentions that he has a crap-ton of OPM to invest now, so he can afford to take some long-shots. -ellie

  21. My thoughts on Netscape by leamanc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once on a flight, I was reading a book about web standards, and the guy sitting next to me struck up a conversation. He said that he knew a lot about the web, joining Netscape in 1995 and staying near the end, being one of the last two or three employees. He said that Netscape was undone because upper management got extremely arrogant over their initial dominance in the browser market. They thought nobody, not even Microsoft could take them down.

    He said they would laugh at feature requests by users, play foosball and drink beer all day...basically one big party while IE slowly and surely crushed them.

    Based on this, I would be very wary that anyone associated with the original Netscape has the management skills to make a new browser a success.

    --
    :q!
  22. Born dead by cbraescu1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RockMelt is going to be born dead. There is nothing it can do in terms of Facebook integration that Firefox + Facebook-related theme + Facebook plugin. And RockMelt has no viable business model - there is no place anymore for mainstream browsers.

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
  23. flock 2.0? by j1mmy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we all know how popular flock turned out to be.

  24. bah, kids.... by zogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..we were doing all that "flying through strange landscapes of flying numbers and other weird futuristic landscapes" stuff in the 60s, and didn't even need the goggles!

  25. Sandboxes? by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Each process is placed in a sandbox to protect your security and privacy.

    Jails/partitions, or just chroot? What, on Windows?

    Or do you mean the javascript engine is a separate instance (because it's a separate process) so they're sandboxed from each other because they're in different processes. Which is a good thing, but describing it as putting each PROCESS in a sandbox is misleading as hell.

  26. my ultimate tip suggestion by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remove ALL GUIs that use traditional windows/dialogs/menus and make them all like PVR OSD menus that
    are easy to use, look pretty and most of call can be accessed by a remote control or touch screen easily.
    Use overlays with transparency for status bars/widgets/addons.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  27. Anti-trust winners and losers by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a little off-topic, but here is another example. There is a litany of evidence that Intel used illegal, anti-competitive practices against AMD. Every major vendor lined up to testify against Intel because of this. Several countries have already found Intel guilty. But those illegal business tactics were effective to the point that it kept AMD from developing market share, even when they had superior products. Intel cheated, ran AMD into the ground, and even when all the anti-trust trials are over, AMD might not even exist anymore, let alone come out a victor in any way shape or form.

    The lesson seems to be that cheaters do prosper. What you might pay in a fine later is a drop in the bucket to winning market share and becoming a monopoly.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  28. YOU'VE GOT TO BE FUCKING SHITTING ME!!! by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sorry for the shouting and swearing, but I am just BLOWN AWAY by this. Does anyone else remember the comic that Google released last year to introduce Chrome?

    PAGE FUCKING ONE:

    Today, most of what we use the web for on a day-to-day basis aren't just web pages, they're applications. Wouldn't it be great, then, to start from scratch, and design something based on the needs of today's web applications and today's users?
    --Google, 9/2/2008

    And from today's FA:

    But Mr. Andreessen suggested the new browser would be different, saying that most other browsers had not kept pace with the evolution of the Web, which had grown from an array of static Web pages into a network of complex Web sites and applications. "There are all kinds of things that you would do differently if you are building a browser from scratch," Mr. Andreessen said.
    --Marc Andreessen, 8/13/2009

    It's as if he fell asleep reading the comic, dreamt about it, and woke up thinking he had an original idea. Then again, TFA says he said "most other browsers", so maybe he's specifically excluding Chrome? :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  29. Re:The problem with the "plug-in" model by icebraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "If there are a hundred password remember-ers, maybe the built in one sucks?"

    No, it doesn't. I don't need a new password remebering system, and I DON'T more bloat to include stuff "other people" find useful. If you want that, I heard Opera is nice. But let me keep my Firefox feature less, thank you.