Slashdot Mirror


The Press Releases of the Damned

Harry writes "Once upon a time, Microsoft said that Windows Vista would transform life as we knew it. Palm said its Foleo was a breakthrough. Circuit City said firing its most experienced salespeople would save the company. And Apple said that Web apps were all that iPhone owners needed. I've collected the original press releases for these and other ill-fated tech announcements, and annotated them with the facts as they played out in the real world."

57 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Not worth reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The stupid "article" is spread over 8 pages. Slashdot should have some standards for posted articles... and no, I'm not new here.

    1. Re:Not worth reading by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and no, I'm not new here.

      Well obviously. "Anonymous Coward" has been here since the very beginning and has an even lower UID than CmdrTaco ;)

      I'll save everybody the trouble and just link to the only one that's remotely interesting. The AOL-Time Warner merger. How'd that work out again? I stopped getting three AOL CDs/disks a week so they must have done something right ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Not worth reading by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The AOL/Time Warner thing was a colossal fuckup; but I have to hand it to the guys on the AOL side.

      AOL, purveyor of overpriced, under-performing dialup access and horrendous software to complete morons, managed to (just as it was becoming abundantly clear that dialup was doomed and that the internet at large was superior to the walled garden) convince Time Warner, a company with some actual hope, that they were worth an amazing amount of money.

    3. Re:Not worth reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Normally I'd agree with you.

      But in this case, each page is for a separate example, and there's not excessive advertising splashed between the pages. For once, this layout seemed appropriate and very well done.

    4. Re:Not worth reading by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

      AutoPager for FireFox or
      Re-pagination

      AutoPager requires 'plugin' scripts for sites (which there is one for technologizer). But it makes it look like one page.

      [header]
      page 1
      page 2
      page 3
      [footer]

      Re-pagination works on most sites I've tried it on (other than those damn Javascript "next" buttons). But it loads a copy of each of the pages.

      [header]
      page 1
      [footer]
      [header]
      page 2
      [footer]
      [header]
      page 3
      [footer]

    5. Re:Not worth reading by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Funny

      What the heck is AOL?

    6. Re:Not worth reading by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The AOL/TW merger could and should have been a massive success. AOL was at the time THE premium content delivery network, and Time Warner has scads of content in print, music, video, TV - just the sort of thing people might pay to see. AOL was just starting broadband and Time Warner had the infrastructure. It really could have lead to a service where you got content and broadband all for some fairly reasonable price. But back to reality... AOL were supremely arrogant and didn't know innovation if it bit them on the ass (witness how they handled Netscape & Nullsoft). And Time Warner were an old school media conglomerate terrified of the internet. Neither side had a clue how to work "synergies" and the whole lot just collapsed in a heap. I'm sure Steve Case made a mint, but the whole deal was a disaster from the get go.

    7. Re:Not worth reading by REggert · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're kidding, right?

      Just in case you live in a cave, AOL = America Online, the #1 ISP of people who don't know better.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aol

      --

      cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

    8. Re:Not worth reading by methano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is exactly right. A lot of people hoot on Steve Case over this deal. I think it was a genius move on his part as explained above. I did the math back when it happened and AOL was valued at around $7K per US household. It would take a long time to get that kind of money back. It was a disastrous deal on TW's part. Overall it was a bad deal because TW was twice as stupid as Case and company were smart.

    9. Re:Not worth reading by teslar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well obviously. "Anonymous Coward" has been here since the very beginning and has an even lower UID than CmdrTaco ;)

      If I remember right, the AC has an (internal) UID of 666 - which would by higher than CmdrTaco's 1 :)

    10. Re:Not worth reading by IPFreely · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If you are comparing AOL to the internet and modern ISPs, then you are completely correct.

      The thing with AOL is that it was around *before* the internet and those other ISPs. AOL came around in the age of the BBS.
      Everything was dial-up. Mail was tossed and copied around node to node. It was almost all local due to phone charges. What AOL did was make a national BBS, and put in local dial-up access points in most local calling areas. It was bigger than any other BBS of the time. It offered mail to any other AOL user, and mail bridges to most other networks (like compuserv). They had a GUI when everyone else was text based. You can't call them stupid for being the biggest provider in their market. Their problem was that the market changed.

      When the internet finally did grow up, AOL was already big. The problem is that the internet changed the online equation. Access became commodity. AOL had to rely on content. (That's why the TW deal). But eventually, the internet had more content too. So AOL is a leftover giant.

      I guess we could just expect them to rollover and die because they are outdated. But it's funny how many people don't want to do that, regardless of how outdated they are.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    11. Re:Not worth reading by Bat+Country · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't forget Compuserve who was the granddaddy of AOL and modern ISPs and the first to bring nationwide dial-up home computer network access to American families.

      I actually pulled the first open source program I ever used from a friend's dad's Compuserve after reading about it in a catalog listing from one of those generic BBS file collection CDs they used to sell.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    12. Re:Not worth reading by JustinOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

      You remember right. If you directly go to UID #1, you get CmdrTaco. If you go directly to UID #666, you get "Anonymous Coward".

      And 1 < 666.

    13. Re:Not worth reading by el_gordo101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Originally, they were a distributor of 3.5" floppies that could be re-formatted and re-used. They changed their business model when floppies fell out of favor and CDs became popular. It was then that they became the #1 polluter in the US by distributing millions of useless shiny plastic coasters to every man, woman, and child in the country, overwhelming landfills across the nation.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    14. Re:Not worth reading by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What the heck is AOL?

      The first major brand of malware. I worked tech support at an ISP in the late 90s, and occasionally you'd get a call from someone whose computer would no longer dial in. When pressed, they'd admit that they tried out "that AOL disk I got in the mail / found on the mall floor / found under my windshield wiper", and we'd sigh and tell them to find their Windows installation disk. There was no known way of uninstalling that junk other than by reinstalling Windows.

      A few stalwart customers would insist on re-trying the experiment every six months or so to see if the situation had improved, that is, whether the inferior dialup software to a substandard provider had suddenly stopped horking systems. It hadn't. We'd tell them that it was reinstall time again, they'd cuss, then we'd be good for another half year.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    15. Re:Not worth reading by cstacy · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are comparing AOL to the internet and modern ISPs, then you are completely correct. The thing with AOL is that it was around *before* the internet and those other ISPs. AOL came around in the age of the BBS.

      AOL was actually a latecomer to the scene. BBSing was popular for about 10 years before AOL. And there were a number of commercial consumer dialup information/chat/email services similar to AOL that started around then. CompuServe and The Source were both about 10 or 11 years older than AOL. Another was Prodigy, about 4 years older than AOL. The Internet predated AOL by about 7 years (or many more years than that, depending on exactly what you want to count). But the Internet was not widely available to the general public until around 1989, which is contemporaneous with AOL. AOL didn't get chat rooms and such until sometime in the 1990s, though.

    16. Re:Not worth reading by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AOL came along on the tail end of the BBS era. The internet was already going strong at universities and was getting off the ground for home dial-up accounts. They were the guy that shows up ready to party just as the hosts are getting ready for bed. Their business plan was practically expired before they launched.

      For years after, they pressed forward with their walled garden and hourly rates in the face of flat fee dialup internet counting on an overwhelming flood of marketing to overcome fundamental shortcomings in their product. Their customers mostly consisted of people who had never heard of the Internet and those who finally gave up after repeated attempts to cancel their account.

      Their marketing became so strident by the end, they were actually offering more free hours than existed in a month to get people to sign up and depending on making cancellation a bureaucratic near-impossibility to stay afloat. They were stupid to believe that a crazy huge marketing campaign could keep a fundamentally flawed service alive forever.

      In the process they made themselves synonymous with anything and everything that wasn't good about the Internet (including spam for quite a while). Their one and only real value (as "the free blank floppy of the month club") went away when they switched to sending CDROMS. Let's face it, once you have 4-6 of those, you just don't need any more coasters.

      The only reason they were expected to roll over and die is because they had already made it clear they were unable or unwilling to offer what the customer wanted to buy.

      Their crowning achievement was convincing TW (somehow) that they were worth $7000/U.S. household.

    17. Re:Not worth reading by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They were stupid to believe that a crazy huge marketing campaign could keep a fundamentally flawed service alive forever.

      Why is that stupid? It works for the two major political parties in the United States. Why wouldn't it work for AOL? ;)

      Their crowning achievement was convincing TW (somehow) that they were worth $7000/U.S. household.

      You mean a service that charges $239.40 a year ($19.95/mo) for each subscriber isn't worth $7,000 per American household? All they'd have to do to make that much money is have zero expenses and sign up every single household for 30 years.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    18. Re:Not worth reading by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's AOL keyword: slashdot to you.

  2. Obligitory by vil3nr0b · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever to be released Q4 2009.

    1. Re:Obligitory by space_jake · · Score: 2, Informative

      Duke Nukem Forever to be released Q4 1997.

  3. They were right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft said that Windows Vista would transform life as we knew it.

    to a living hell!

    1. Re:They were right.... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because you don't have enough ram ... what Bill Gates REALLY said was "640 gigabytes should be enough for anyone!"

      Remember Weird Al's song about Windows 95 - "

      There's so much stuff to buy
      I need a new harddrive
      It's gonna suck me dry.
      My CPU says,
      'don't have the speed',
      it takes an hour just to bring up the screen

      Life imitates art. Microsoft is taking its' HID cues from Weird Al (which explains a lot :-)

    2. Re:They were right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remember Weird Al's song about Windows 95

      <pedantic>That wasn't Weird Al. He never made a parody of "Start Me Up" about Windows 95. Al's not the only guy who can write parodies, you know.</pedantic>

      <character type="Comic Book Store Guy">So please review your facts next time before you talk, ignoramus. Hmph.</character>

  4. It goes without saying... by DavidR1991 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that irrespective of the situation, press releases are never going to say "this sucks" or "this is completely unoriginal". A few of these are genuine oversights/lack of forward thinking (e.g. the iPhone app one) but the majority of them are standard marketing hyperbole that appears everywhere ("This cleaning product will TRANSFORM YOUR LIFE!").

    1. Re:It goes without saying... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...that irrespective of the situation, press releases are never going to say "this sucks" or "this is completely unoriginal". A few of these are genuine oversights/lack of forward thinking (e.g. the iPhone app one) but the majority of them are standard marketing hyperbole that appears everywhere ("This cleaning product will TRANSFORM YOUR LIFE!").

      Life boils down to a question of whether people are talkin' the straight shit or just a line of bullshit. Bullshit pays more but the straight shit lets you look yourself in the mirror.

      The funny thing, people love the bullshit. They bullshit others, they bullshit themselves. It amazes me when someone does due diligence, get told something that's true but they don't like it. This big deal I'm salivating over, it's smarter to pass it up than get all my money tied up in it? Fuck you. What, you're saying my income can only support getting the fancy house and the car, not the house, the car, and the yacht? Fuck you twice-over, cocksucker.

      You get some exec with a grandiose plan, something that's really going to make his name, cement his reputation, there's no way of telling him it's just not that good of an idea. So any analyst who wants to remain employed will provide the analysis the boss wants to see, not what he needs to see. And this kind of warped, demented thinking will persist until objective reality makes itself known with all the subtlety of a ship foundering upon the rocky shore.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:It goes without saying... by datapharmer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cocaine is not a cleaning product...

      Sure it is... it works great at getting that pesky cartilage stuff out of your nose.

      --
      Get a web developer
  5. Ugh by sheepweevil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    8 pages and no printer friendly version (that I can find)? This is why /.ers don't RTFA!

    1. Re:Ugh by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On top of that, if you look at your noscript menu you can see that the multiple page layout is just an attempt to create more ad impressions. Eight pages of free ad credit for a one-page article? DO NOT WANT

      If only I didn't have to watch a fucking video tutorial to use autopager, I might have read his stupid article. But I still wouldn't click next seven times.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Ugh by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      needs jscript to view.

      forget it, then! anyone want to paste in the actual content? or, maybe even that isn't worth the time.

      slashvertisements just help authors get page hits. and that is NOT what slash is supposed to be about, guys..

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  6. I wonder. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are the flacks who write these sorts of releases embittered mercenaries who know they are puking shit into the public consciousness but just don't give a fuck, or are they bright eyed eternal optimists who actually think in PR language and sincerely believe each release as they write it(before, of course, believing something entirely different to write the next one)?

    1. Re:I wonder. by gnalre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hands up all who thought at the time hmm, AOL and Time Warner, now that's a good idea. Equally ebay, skype, yes I can see the synergy there.

      OK sometimes someone sees something the rest of us can't and makes a billion, but its amazing how many times ideas that look really stupid to most of us are actually really stupid. Of course the people who pay for it are the common employee's who don't get asked their opinion.

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    2. Re:I wonder. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought the AOL purchase of Time-Warner was a brilliant move on the part of AOL. It was their only chance of survival. I think it could have worked if Time-Warner's phobia about Internet distribution and piracy hadn't proceeded to infect AOL.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a PR/marketing flack myself, I'll freely admit that I'm an embittered mercenary, as I think most in the profession are. But the problem is not us marketing people; it's just the nature of the industry. 1) No one will read a press release unless it claims a huge benefit. No one reads press releases to begin with, but a press release that makes only modest claims will just get drowned out in the overwhelming 24/7 noise of the modern marketosphere. 2) No client will approve a release that makes him sound anything less than the reincarnation of Jesus Christ and his product anything less than the Holy Grail 2.0. 3) Selling is hard, stressful work. You can't afford to have a rational conversation with the public about the merits and demerits of your product, because your job is on the line if the sales curve slacks, so you've got to do your damnedest to sell the thing, no matter how awful it is.

    4. Re:I wonder. by greenguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've written a few press releases in my day (for politics, not technology). The answer is, people who write these sorts of releases know that journalists are lazy, and routinely cut and paste sentences from them into their articles. The really lazy ones paste in the entire press release.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    5. Re:I wonder. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AOL-TW was much like the more recent Daimler-Chrysler deal. Within 18-24 months the C Level execs that founded/grew AOL/Chrysler were on their ear run off the board. In AOL's case the idea of purchasing TW was to get exclusive content... to be someplace people PAID to go for exclusive media.. (sound familiar!!) but TW ran it's own sites and refused to play along, that demoted AOL to "advertising" only exclusives... which gutted it's base. Because they were "afraid" of publishing media they botched netscape/mozilla terribly, just like yahoo, running back to Microsoft IE when MSN was a toy. They could have had Nullsoft/winamp as THE media center but again TW didn't want to put any ACTUAL MEDIA on AOL!!! Of course TW was the same company that close the WB stores not because they were losing money.. .but because they weren't making ENOUGH profit and took real marketing and planning to keep the stores full off goodies versus movie or record production. Of course then the released Lotr and Harry Potter... Imagine the merchandising they missed out on!

  7. Generated with Print Screen for your pleasure! by jimicus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'd think when people used screenshots of something they threw together in a word processor they'd at least turn off auto-spell check underlining so it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb.

  8. Damn!! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why I'm running low on coasters AOL stopped sending them out in 2006 :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  9. Sony by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sony ditching their AI and other cutting-edge 'out there' research (like the Qrio and Aibo) to focus on media/entertainment. Sony Labs used to feel like one of those wicked Zaibatsus as described in Neuromancer.

    It happened shortly after they took on an American board member, incidentally.

    HP did much the same under Carly.

    ATT's Bell Labs, too.

    I hope Research in Motion's Perimeter Institute takes off. These corporate research labs are where we get all the best stuff!

    1. Re:Sony by vbraga · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting, I don't really understand Sony corporate structure, but as far as I know, Sony Music Entertainment was a separate company Sony bought in late 80s (Wikipedia seems to back this up).

      Do really they ditched their core business (high tech) for their media business? Wikipedia says the same as you:

      The AIBO and the rest of Sony's artificial intelligence program was discontinued after 2005 in Sony's effort to make the company more profitable.

      But offers no source. Sony AIBO Europe announcement doesn't says it was ditching the whole AI and robot program. This seems very strange.

      There's seems to be at least one (really liked that page design) Sony Lab out there.

      Disappointing.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
  10. In defense of the Circuit City press release by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to write press releases myself in my younger days and often times you're stuck in a very difficult position of having to spin something that's very negative into something that at least doesn't make a bad situation even worse. Let's face it, there are only two reasons that companies ever lay off employees en mass: a budget cut that makes it unavoidable, or an attempt to streamline by removing an entire redundant or poorly-performing area or division. Private sector companies are loathe to admit the former, and so they almost always couch a large layoff as the latter.

    They do this because they know that, if they show weakness, their stock will tank and they'll have even MORE layoffs than they've already had. And laying off people is never easy to do. Despite the reputation that corporations have for being heartless, they are nonetheless made up of real human beings--very few of whom take any pleasure in having to throw their employees' lives into chaos (not to mention the real damage it does to the company itself and its projects).

    Of course, sometimes the stock still tanks anyway (savvy investors are rarely fulled by mere spin), but to publicly announce "Hey, we're going into the shitter" is still irresponsible. And the only alternative to "We're streamlining" or "We're facing cuts" is "We axed these people capriciously, just because we felt like it." So the choice is pretty clear.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:In defense of the Circuit City press release by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it that in this day and age the movement of the market (and the whole underpinnings of the global economy) is based on things like the perception of how someone wrote a press release? It seems crazy to me that we put up with things like this. However IANAE (economist) so I have no idea how structure our economy differently

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:In defense of the Circuit City press release by name_already_taken · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it that in this day and age the movement of the market (and the whole underpinnings of the global economy) is based on things like the perception of how someone wrote a press release?

      It's because investors and speculators are indeed crazy. People are sheep.

      My parents told me a story of how my grandmother flagged them down as they were driving down the street one day. They pulled over and my grandmother came over to the car, looked around to make sure nobody would overhear the sage investment advice she was about to reveal, and said "pepper's going scarce".

      There was a rumor amongst all the old ladies in town that there was a shortage of pepper, and so they were rushing out to the stores to buy all the pepper they could before it ran out. For a week or so, there was a real shortage of pepper in that city, because of all the old people rushing to buy it.

      Compare that to what happens to the retail price of fossil fuels when something just as ridiculous happens, and you can see that the people who have influence over the price of things are just a collection of irrational sheep. Once you realize that, it becomes clear as to how you can influence markets and prices if you have some money to invest in the right place or if you can say the right words in front of enough people.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    3. Re:In defense of the Circuit City press release by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it that in this day and age the movement of the market (and the whole underpinnings of the global economy) is based on things like the perception of how someone wrote a press release? It seems crazy to me that we put up with things like this. However IANAE (economist) so I have no idea how structure our economy differently

      The problem is that as an investor, if you are invested in a company that is basically sound, but is currently in a weak market position, if a lot of people perceive that this current weak position is a fundamental flaw in the company, their reaction to that perception can make it a reality.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:In defense of the Circuit City press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thing is, layoffs are virtually *never* the right response. You don't regain profitability in the long term by cutting costs. You do it by increasing revenue, and you can't increase revenue in a slow economy with fewer people on board to do the necessary work.

  11. Not just tech press releases by drseuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Peace for our time" - Neville Chamberlain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_for_our_time == "Peace after 1946"

    "Mission accomplished!" George W. Bush http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_Accomplished == "Mission not accomplished"

    "Titanic goes down: everyone safe" Daily Express, April 1912 http://www.newstatesman.com/200606190037 == well, even the Cameron film didn't distort reality quite that much.

  12. And some comments on press releases... by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 4, Informative

    My favourite, regarding the announcement of the iPod:

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame
      -- CmdrTaco

    1. Re:And some comments on press releases... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taco gets a lot of flack for that, but honestly I did agree with him. And I still do. The first Ipod sucked. Mac only, expensive as heck, not much storage space. But, it didn't stay sucky. It improved over the years, gradually adding features to make it appeal to more consumers. I'd say the release of the ipod with a usb interface for pc's was the ground breaking announcement. If you still thought they wouldn't make an impact then you should be made fun of.

      I mean, did anyone really think windows was going to be a hit after microsoft released windows 1.0?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  13. Re:Where are the slashdot articles? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who could forget Cmdr Taco's little gem?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  14. Apple's press releases aren't mistakes... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to take Apple's announcements at face value (or at least at the same level of face value as anyone else in the industry) but I learned better.

    When Steve Jobs says "flash MP3 players are junk" or "no ugly monitors on nice macs" or any of those other announcements that they're going to turn around a year or three later when they release the iPod Shuffle or "bring your own display keyboard and mouse" Mac mini it's all part of their "never say anything meaningful about future product releases" policy. You can't tell ANYTHING about what Apple's going to release based on what they say. Jobs doesn't just play his cards close to his chest, they're surgically implanted.

    1. Re:Apple's press releases aren't mistakes... by jimicus · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the contrary, I think you've just proven that if Apple will at some point in the next 1-3 years release something that's the exact opposite of what they're announcing.

      In fact, now I think of it I'm sure Jobs announced that the iPod would never have video because there was no point in such a small device.

  15. Re:Where are the slashdot articles? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....or have slashdot never been wrong?

    We have never been wrong. It's just that some of our post refer to conditions in alternate universes. It's a geek thing.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  16. Re:Where are the slashdot articles? by Tomsk70 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It *was* a flop.

    Apple managed to keep millions brain-dead about mp3's, VBR, lossless...all in the name of style.

    Like they did with their computers, in fact.

  17. Short Circuit by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I liked this part from the Circuit City story...

    The company has completed a wage management initiative that will result in the separation of approximately 3,400 store Associates. The separations, which are occurring today, focused on Associates who were paid well above the market-based salary range for their role. New Associates will be hired for these positions and compensated at the current market range for the job.

    How far up your butt does your head have to be to refer to a layoff as a "separation"? Such gutless prose deserves our complete contempt.

    It has been my experience that managers who lay off their best people to save money don't understand their business. This is what happens when you hire MBA's.

    1. Re:Short Circuit by jhhl · · Score: 2

      You breezed right by the "Associates" euphemism as well!
      A more subtle one was "well above the market based salary range,"
        neglecting to say in which country that range was based on or what "well above" really entails.
       

      --
      -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  18. Re:Not worth readingAOL NOT TOTALLY WORTHLESS by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Originally, they were a distributor of 3.5" floppies that could be re-formatted and re-used. They changed their business model when floppies fell out of favor and CDs became popular...became the #1 polluter in the US by distributing millions of useless shiny plastic coasters...

    Hey, they didn't become totally worthless then. Those tin containers containing those coasters are the best thing yet to reuse when putting your own precious CD/DVDs into the trunks of the elephants employed by the U.S. Snail Service.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  19. Press Releases of The Damned by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Today The Damned announced that their forthcoming single "New Rose" will be available in the shops on Tuesday, to be followed by "Eloise" next month. Spokesman Captain Sensible, when asked to clarify, was quoted as saying "Wot?".