Slashdot Mirror


Woman Fired For Using Uppercase In Email

tomachi writes "An accountant in NZ has been awarded $17,000 NZD for unfair dismissal after her boss fired her without warning for using uppercase letters in a single email to co-workers. The email, which advises her team how to fill out staff claim forms, specifies a time and date highlighted in bold red, and a sentence written in capitals and highlighted in bold blue. It reads: 'To ensure your staff claim is processed and paid, please do follow the below checklist.' Her boss deemed the capital letters too confrontational for her co-workers to read after they woke up from naptime."

64 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Time to fire all lawyers by hernick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, the time has to come fire all lawyers who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs!

    1. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      s/ who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs//g

    2. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by rssrss · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, it is required by law in certain contract clauses:

      See, e.g. Uniform Commercial Code Section 2-316 (2) requirement that exclusions of warranties be "conspicuous" and the definition of that word at Sec. 1-201 (b)(10).

      Sorry to go statutory on you, but I don't like all caps any more than you do.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    3. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the code you cite, bold, italic, colored, or merely larger are all acceptable ways to make a section conspicuous, whereas the only mention of all caps is for headings. There is no technological justification for using all caps for body text that is required to be emphasized, and it could be said that doing so is actually rather nefarious, given that all caps is second only to poor color choice as a way to make text both noticeable and unreadable.

    4. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Caps remain caps if read without HTML-formatting?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by reebmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a lawyer, and I'll be the first to admit that many of my colleagues do little to help themselves when it comes to being end user friendly. The blocks of all caps being a sure symptom of that. A site about contract drafting style actually had a pretty good discussion regarding the conspicuousness requirements and the use of all caps: http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/04/all-capitals/

      In my opinion, the all caps paragraphs are merely remnants from a time when contracts were drafted without the assistance of word processors capable of doing bold face type. And, frankly, that wasn't that long ago. Many lawyers that I know continue to cut and paste the boilerplate language or modify the boilerplate language keeping in tact whatever drafting convention was used originally.

      That said, there is also some advantage to using all caps over bold face for when it comes to OCR, text translation, format-less archiving, etc. In that case, the "conspicuousness" is maintained (i.e., all caps), even if the formatting is dropped. It's a very weak advantage.

    6. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by teh+kurisu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually the reason for all caps in legal documents is that certain parts of the text are required to have greater visual emphasis relative to the rest of the document, as they tend to be the important parts. If you're working in plain text then all caps is your only option.

      I'm sure that the fact that all caps is harder to read hasn't escaped the notice of these bloodsuckers either.

    7. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by byuu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good point. How about using Kirby for emphasis instead?

      )>^_^)> The software is provided "as is" and the author <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> disclaims all warranties with regard to this    <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> software including all implied warranties of    <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> merchantability and fitness.                    <(^_^(<

    8. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by theskipper · · Score: 2, Funny

      s/ who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs/ out of a 700lb cannon/g

      FTFY.

    9. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the quietest yelling you've ever read.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    10. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by fibonacci8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could be a lot more concise by replacing 99% of legal documents with the following:

      t(^_^t)

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  2. Wow. by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is actually one of the better formatted emails I've seen. Much as I dislike off-like emails, it's verging on good information design rather than offensiveness or even ugliness.

    Also... when did people stop understanding the word "please"?

    1. Re:Wow. by gruvmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And there will still be people who read that email and either miss the deadline or don't follow the instructions.

    2. Re:Wow. by WraithCube · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also... when did people stop understanding the word "please"?

      Apparently some people decided that "please" makes it sound like its optional. Thus if you put please in it less people listen. Stupid I know, but true nonetheless.

    3. Re:Wow. by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just find a company that has a clue and cares with respect to actual work done per dollar productivity. There have been multiple studies that have found a nap in the afternoon substantially boosts alertness and productivity, so the employer gets more work done for their money and the employees are also generally happier.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  3. hehehe by Normal+Dan · · Score: 4, Funny

    hehehe HAHAH heeheeeheeeheee HAHAHAHAAHAA!!!
    *sigh* heh... naptime?... confrontational?... heheh.... I don't know where to start... hehehe..
    *sigh* OK, I'm done.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  4. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you sir are fired.

  5. Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by aardwolf64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    See what you did? You made me RTFA just to see if it actually mentioned naps (it doesn't, btw.)

  6. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think her boss was e.e.cummings.

  7. There must be more to this story... by Zen+Hash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly, there must be more to this story... The email excerpt alone is hardly "confrontational".

    I'd bet there was a more personal confrontation, possibly with a superior, and that email was simply seen as a better excuse to get rid of her than the real reason.

    --
    Here I sit, all broken hearted.
    Came to poop, but only farted.
    1. Re:There must be more to this story... by ktappe · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you RTA, there was more to the story. The woman (allegedly) had a history of confrontation with her coworkers. But she was never reprimanded for those; just summarily fired with no warning and the only "evidence" the employer could dig up was this single e-mail. Basically the employer blatantly mishandled the entire situation and was left grasping at straws, trying to use an e-mail as justification.

      In short, she wasn't just fired for the caps in the e-mail; it was simply claimed she was.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    2. Re:There must be more to this story... by TheRon6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd bet there was a more personal confrontation, possibly with a superior, and that email was simply seen as a better excuse to get rid of her than the real reason.

      My thoughts exactly. I don't see this as a story about someone being fired for using caps lock. I see it as a story about a manager who was too stupid to have a legitimate reason to fire her prepared ahead of time and has cost their company $17k as a result. One of my coworkers was fired several months ago because he didn't have one of the certifications that's required of everyone in my department. He'd never had the certification of course but that hadn't stopped my company from hiring him and letting him work there for a year. But he was *really* fired for getting into a very long, personal argument with our supervisor. Clever managers will always have some excuse stashed away to get rid of anyone if needed. Sounds like this manager wasn't nearly clever enough.

      --
      Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
    3. Re:There must be more to this story... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't see this as a story about someone being fired for using caps lock

      Indeed. Even though the use of caps lock merits a summary hanging, it does not merit sacking. ;-)

  8. the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem is that she's sending HTML email.

    1. Re:the real problem by ndege · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the blink tag? ;) Seems like a firing offence to me.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    2. Re:the real problem by trawg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where are you writing from, 1980?!

      As long as clients are sending correctly formatted multipart emails to allow plain text readers the chance to read as well, HTML email is a good thing.

      I used to be a hater too. But over the last many years of writing many, many long emails and seeing them get ignored, I found I could write long emails and just highlight the importand parts in bold or with colour. That way the low-attention-span people at the other end who couldn't take 5 minutes out of their day to read my carefully justified reasoning about why I wanted to do something in a certain way (...because the alternative was sending them a one line email saying what I wanted to do and then getting forfty thousand follow-up emails about why) could just focus on the bright shiny important bits (such as questions) which I really wanted them to see.

      Sure, I could have just written in dot point form. There's a few reasons I write non-terse emails though - 1) I enjoy writing 2) I like making sure I've covered every possible eventuality and writing them all out helps me 3) I like providing all the information a recipient will (hopefully) need to make a decision.

      I've changed my writing style several times over the years to try and communicate more clearly with people who a) rely on email for their job and b) don't like reading and it's been a pretty painful process. No doubt I still haven't gotten it right, but formatting in HTML email is one thing that I've found that makes it easier for me to tailor emails to a given audience.

    3. Re:the real problem by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real problem is that she's sending HTML email.

      HTML can add a lot to the expressiveness of your email. This is a good thing, as it improves communication.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:the real problem by koinu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes. HTML is high priority on my systems! It is always marked read first and ends fastest in my trash folder.

      Perhaps... I should mention... this is all being done automatically by procmail.

    5. Re:the real problem by obarel · · Score: 5, Funny

      to be honest I'm actually sick of websites that use html stop they just don't look right on my teleprinter stop less markup and more content is what I say stop

    6. Re:the real problem by Karellen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The keyword there is *can*. Yes, it *can* add expressiveness to your email. In my experience, most of the time it does not. For about 98% of HTML emails I receive it just adds meaningless noise in the form of horrid fonts, freakishly large or small font sizes, garish colours and completely pointless logo image attachments. (The other 2% of the time it merely adds nothing.) I want to read the text of your email in the font of my choosing, at the size I find comfortable, in colours that don't give me headaches. As for your company logo which you attach to *every* *single* *email* - yeah, that's not at all completely pointless.

      Oh, you could use *bold*, or /italic/, or _underlines_, but my "plain text" email reader will add bold, italic or underline highlights if it sees the preceding markup, which was in popular use at least 5 years before HTML was invented, and about 10 years before the first version of Outlook - the mail client from hell that actively subverted all the tried-and-tested "good practice" conventions for making email actually productive - was ever released and popularised HTML email.

      So, uh, how exactly does HTML email improve communication again? Because I don't see it. I've never felt the desire to bother, and every email I've received where it being in HTML has made a difference, it's been for the worse.

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    7. Re:the real problem by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I totally agree. How can you get the full impact of what I've written you if your email client isn't capable of displaying 36 pt comic sans in lavender?

      Kidding. As I remember, I was using PINE as my client when people around me started writing HTML format emails. I don't remember now having been able to read those messages; thus your luddite argument. But even after I was able to read HTML emails, I got sick of email forwards full of photos, animated gifs, and even embedded audio. And so I regarded HTML email as generally being obnoxious. And then came the warnings about executable code being embedded in HTML emails. However, looking back, I don't think I ever got a malicious email that didn't depend 100% social engineering to be effective.

  9. It wouldn't be a problem... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If everyone else did their job right and didn't need the bolded and capital letters.

    If anything, everyone else should have been reprimanded and she should have been told not to warn them anymore.

  10. Ob. bash.org by schon · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.bash.org/?835030

    It's funny, 'cuz it's true. :)

    1. Re:Ob. bash.org by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL, I dunno why, but that's pretty funny! Can't stop laughing - I think I've got a case of the Mondays or something!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  11. Uh huh by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After reading the article (which was darn light on the details) I smell a usual workplace suspect: This woman was a much bigger pain in the butt then she was worth. And like many workplace pains she kept her nose JUST clean enough to not be fired for anything serious. Somebody gambled by using a stupid reason and lost. Although I also look at the amount they paid and think $17K is a pittance for the lost time and lost personel who don't want to work with the pain.

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:Uh huh by kenp2002 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they fire her for wrong doing it won't count towards "Turnover Count" but if they let her go it would impact the turn-over numbers. If they haven't had any turnover for say 5 years then there is incentive to ensure the "good record" goes unblemished.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  12. not the whole story by DaveGod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA:

    She had also acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against her by colleagues.

    That little line tells us there's far more to this story than using caps in an email, but they just drop it in and try to pretend it isn't there, like an embarrassing little fart that stinks up the story they want to write.

    I know we enjoy complaining about bad journalism but it's no better to promote their shitty little articles.

    1. Re:not the whole story by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what I was thinking: Crazy person uses what little power her position has to make life miserable for coworkers. Coworkers complain. Boss decides crazy person is disrupting business.

      I doubt anything she did was over the top enough to make a clear cut firing case, but nasty people with a little power doing many small, annoying things can make for a bad working environment.

    2. Re:not the whole story by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what exactly is so hard about simply documenting what a PITA this person is, with multiple examples and testimonies from other employees, and then using THAT as justification for dismissal, instead of making up some BS reason like this all-caps email?

      Because in a lot of these cases the crazy person is not so much crazy as frustrated with idiotic co-workers who can't follow simple instructions. Pretty hard to build a case against an employee when all they do is point out inconvenient truths, no matter how annoying the fashion which they do it in, especially if the PHB is (in)directly responsible for those truths being there in the first place.

      Judging from the whole story, it sounds like this particular accountant is "not a teamplayer".

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  13. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    BUT EVERYONE LIKES B1FF'S POSTS!

    (filter food)

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  14. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    i think her boss was e.e. cummings.

    FTFY.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  15. Sometimes you learn to live with it. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work IT at a home nursing business, and I get work tickets submitted all the time. The nurses and office coordinators use software that -- don't ask me why -- requires them to use all capital letters when entering patient visit notes and ordering medications. They leave the CAPS LOCK key on all the time as part of their professional work, and are so used to it that it doesn't stand out when they use it in other contexts.

    You learn to live with it.

    1. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You learn to live with it.

      That's not entirely true. I started out in programming (in Assembler, Fortran and COBOL) when EVERYTHING WAS IN UPPER CASE on the mainframe computers I was using. There was no lower-case option on my punch-cards, and the same goes for my printers. (Though some of them were the fastest printers I have ever worked with, even to this day.)

      But I never liked uppercase, and was happy as a pig in shit when I got to play around with C.

  16. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also what's up with that measly fine? Given the poor economy it will probably take her a year to find another job, so she should receive one year's salary. (IMHO). Teach these corporations not to mistreat the citizens.

    She has already found another job. She was only out of work for 6 months.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  17. Her boss wanted her gone by WiiVault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever you hear about somebody getting fired for something silly like this it should be pretty clear that the person doing the firing was just waiting for an excuse. Obviously he picked a bad "reason" to fire her.

    1. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

      "I am a single woman with a mortgage, and I had to re-mortgage my home and borrow money from my sister to make it through," she said. "They nearly ruined my life."

      Oh please, it's her employer's fault that she has zero savings, yet still bought a house that she couldn't afford without living literally having to live paycheck to paycheck? That makes the employer "responsible" for owing her a living?

    2. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They nearly ruined my life."

      Wait, so the company paid this person a salary and allowed her to own a home in the first place, but when the company stopped helping her it's "ruining her life"? That is some screwed up entitlement mentality.

    3. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by tkg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You aparently didn't read the article.

      "As part of her compensation, Walker was awarded nearly $6000 in lost wages for the 13 weeks between leaving ProCare and finding a new job, but she says she didn't find fulltime work until October 2008."

      Clearly she DID look for another job, and if you think fighting for fair treatment by an employer is abusing the system, then you must be one of those employers.

      I don't know what the legal system is like in NZ, but if it's anything like in the US, the vast majority of the settlement went to the lawyers, making the whole suit primarily a matter of principle.

    4. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what the legal system is like in NZ, but if it's anything like in the US, the vast majority of the settlement went to the lawyers, making the whole suit primarily a matter of principle.

      Most of the world is a little different. Usually the system is loser pays. So the plaintiff can get damages and get the guilty party to pay for the fact that she had to sue them

    5. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

      No, it's paid by the company that fucked her over. It took its time, but this thread is finally being flooded by Americans (probably libertarians) outraged that the system actually looked after the little guy rather than the corporation.

      Seriously Americans, stop worshipping corporations, they won't return the favour. I don't see how anyone can be against laws that stop companies arbitrarily taking away people's livelihoods. Only in America I suppose...

  18. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    e e cummings

    He hated punctuation & diacriticals too.

    FTFY,

  19. BILLY MAYS HERE!!! by PhiberOptix · · Score: 3, Funny

    BILLY MAYS HERE!!!
    TOO BAD I'M DEAD, OTHERWISE SHE WOULD BE WELCOME TO WORK WITH ME!

    and here is something just to bypass /. caps filtering. I guess she didn't posted here much either.

  20. Reality slowly creeps in by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face it, we are heading back to royalty and peasantry quicker and quicker. Not long and they'll have us back in chains. I knew a former employee of Anderson who was fired after lunch because he had a spot of soup on his tie.

    "At $85 fucking dollars an hour I expect your monkey ass to be fucking spotless, get the fuck out of my office you unkempt shit!"

    That is why I got out of consulting as I was sitting outside the door during this exchange. I once lost a contract from having a 102 fever and couldn't drive to drop off a floppy disk with a script for a novell printer remap even though there was 12 copies of the disk sitting on my desk 2 cubes over from where my boss sat...

    "If you can't get to work when we need you, then we don't fucking need you. You can mail us the pager and badge, your fucking done in this town!"

    We are pesants, get used to it. I still see the same H1B guys in Minneapolis (Now what, 13 year later) who put 38-40 hours on their time sheets but a simple check of the parking ramp's badge log and they are there 2-3 days straight and the workstation log shows 80-90 hours a week working. They don't dare put their real time down or it is "back on the boat" for them (I hear that crap from their managers all the time).

    I've been out of consulting now for about 4 years and you couldn't pay me to go back into it. I'm lucky where I am at but the horrors I see here in the Twin Cities makes me ill on how they treat employees. I saw on gal get fired because "she's too pretty" and another "because she dates too much", another "I don't need some fat shit blocking my view..."

    I've even been told by a few executives "I'm a fucking piece of livestock" on several occasions (twice ironically at the same resturant "The Palimino", Minneapolis in the La Salle tower. Nice place btw.)

    It gets worse every year and you wonder why no one goes into IT anymore. I cannot speak outside of the IT\MIS field but I have found that, given a sourge, most would use it on someone. The USA corporate culture is getting bad, real bad. Madoff and the like are just the tip of the iceberg in bad behavior. You should hear the kind of shit they say while on Lake Minnetonka or up on the White Fish chain by Cross Lake and hear what they really think about "the fucking toothless braindead pesants I have working for me". The greed is getting worse not better... so much for being an enlightened society....

    Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened? I'd rather have the old days before the Mafia wen't legit and brought their business methods with them.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened?

      Perhaps you've hit on the root of the problem. Dynastic succession. Untested, unproven people being placed in positions they never earned. Indeed, they feel entitled to them by default.

      To rationalise this, they need a philosophy for why they deserve so much more for so little. They must be in some way inherently more deserving, superior, better than ordinary people. After that, it's rather difficult to treat others with respect.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened?

      Perhaps you've hit on the root of the problem. Dynastic succession. Untested, unproven people being placed in positions they never earned. Indeed, they feel entitled to them by default.

      To rationalise this, they need a philosophy for why they deserve so much more for so little. They must be in some way inherently more deserving, superior, better than ordinary people. After that, it's rather difficult to treat others with respect.

      I'd mod you up if I had points.

      Thankfully, the good thing about dynastic succession is that the successors, not having the experience of having run a struggling company, end up piloting it either into a hole, lining their own pockets, or at best, into a level, zero-growth situation, giving more room for competitors. We benefit from churn. Industries are like soup: they have to be stirred frequently or the scum rises to the top.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have worked for 4 family owned companies (in three of them I knew the families from outside of the work environment). Based on that I have discovered a pattern that I have talked over with others that have experience with multi-generation family owned companies. Generally, the first generation greatly values the employees because they recognize that the value of the company is the result of the people who work for them. Often, the second generation was partially raised by some of the employees of the company (Dad was busy running the company, but he brought Junior to work and had various employees supervise him), and sees them as family that the owner is responsible to look after. The third generation usually sees the whole company as a bunch of numbers to be added and subtracted to maximize the bottom line.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The USA corporate culture is getting bad, real bad.

      That's why the economy went into the toilet and isn't likely to get any better very soon.

      Employers were like that in the 1920s, too.

    5. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by brusk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Until one executive officer decides it is permanently Tuesday.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    6. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by NateTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you actually of the belief that Democrats aren't in the Corporate pocketbook too? Wow. How much money (and corruption) does it take to become President these days?

      It's not a small sum. BOTH sides are playing, and always will.

      Which Party just voted to loan billions to George Soros' company to drill off the coast of Brazil for oil? Yeah...

      --
      +++OK ATH
  21. Your suggestion is stupid and insane by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you actually bothered to read the other story about the cannon build by a dad?

    Notice anything? As big as it is, there is no way you can fit a laywer in there to fire them. Not unless you chop them into little bit firsts and that would get the gun powder wet and unable to fire.

    No sir, firing lawyers is NOT the solution. Try again, or build a bigger cannon.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  22. Maybe she just took an upper that morning by brusk · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that's why everyone is on her case. It's not as though she was doing anything shifty. If I were her boss, I'd just sent her a letter, explaining how some minuscule changes could fix things. Instead of firing her, he should have put on some Dvorak and calmed down, or at least sent a page up to ask the board of the company. In the future, the key thing the firm could do is find an appropriate space and pick up the tab for a function that would teach alternate methods for controlling oneself; I'm sure that would bring significant returns. But them's the breaks, I guess.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
  23. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I'm no physicist, but the months may be shorter and/or follow a different sequence "down under". It is unsafe to assume that your understanding of the space/time continuum applies everywhere......

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  24. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am a physicist. No I don't have a point, but bragging on Slashdot is about as useful as this degree will ever be

  25. Get a grip by syousef · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

    How did she abuse the system exactly? She didn't walk up to her boss and ask to be fired.

    Oh please, it's her employer's fault that she has zero savings, yet still bought a house that she couldn't afford without living literally having to live paycheck to paycheck? That makes the employer "responsible" for owing her a living?

    The laws are there to prevent people turning to crime because they've just lost their subsistence wage jobs and need to feed their family. An employer is in a position of power over his employees.

    People aren't disposable. There is a reason we developed a civilisation where it's not dog eat dog. You enjoy the fruits of that civilisation but don't want it to protect others and call their using that protection "greed". Get a grip.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer