Slashdot Mirror


UK's Oldest Computer To Be "Rebooted"

Smivs writes with this interesting piece of computer history, excerpted from the BBC: "Britain's oldest original computer, the Harwell, is being sent to the National Museum of Computing at Bletchley where it is to be restored to working order. The computer, which was designed in 1949, was built and used by staff at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment in Harwell, Oxfordshire. It first ran in 1951 and was designed to perform mathematical calculations. It lasted until 1973. When first built the 2.4m x 5m computer was state-of-the-art, although it was superseded by transistor-based systems. The restoration project is expected to take a year. Although not the first computer built in the UK, the Harwell had one of the longest service lives. Built by a team of three people, the device was capable of doing the work of six to ten people and ran for seven years until the establishment obtained their first commercial computer. 'We didn't think we were doing anything pioneering at the time,' said Dick Barnes, who helped build the original Harwell computer."

153 comments

  1. obligatory Simpsons quote by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

    "In the future, I predict computers will be twice as powerful, ten times larger and be so expensive only the five richest monarchs of Europe will be able to afford them." - Professor Frink

  2. One word by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Beowulf.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:One word by probityrules · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Stonehenge.

    2. Re:One word by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      of cogs?

    3. Re:One word by ciderVisor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      NO ! We're not gonna f***ing do "Stonehenge"!

      --
      Squirrel!
    4. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they going to put Linux on it?

    5. Re:One word by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Funny
      Imagine a beowulf custer, it's easy if you try Idle time available, while calculating pi Imagine all the systems, we'd cluster today Imagine there's no OS wars, It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or ps for, And no zealotry too Imagine all the systems,computing their piece Whooo Hooo You may say that I'm a schema, But I'm a zero and a one I hope someday you'll join us, And the cluster will be as one Imagine divide by zero, I wonder if you can No need for greedy matching, A motherboard that can Imagine all the processes, Sharing memory You may say that I'm a schema, But I'm a zero and a one I hope someday you'll join us, And the cluster will be as one

      With apologies to john Lennon

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    6. Re:One word by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who modded this offtopic? Stonehenge is seriously claimed by some to be the UK's oldest computer.

    7. Re:One word by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what does it compute?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:One word by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      At a bare minimum the summer solstice, but there are claims that it also computes eclipses.

    9. Re:One word by Derleth · · Score: 1

      Stonehenge is seriously claimed by some to be the UK's oldest computer.

      Only by people deliberately misconstruing the term ‘computer’ to be cute.

      How about this: Single-celled life is, collectively, the world’s oldest computer. After all, it multiplies without external help!

      --
      How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
  3. Obligatory tired meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it run Linux?

    1. Re:Obligatory tired meme by JCCyC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm more interested in having it emulated in MESS.

  4. ...finally! by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once the computer is in working order it will be shipped to San Fransisco where the new Systems Admin will finally be able to sniff out that backdoor appliance.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:...finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the size of that computer, and the shinaigans going on in the early 70's in the UK, they'll have to "sniff out" more than just backdoor appliances. I bet there are a lot of shady surprizes stashed beneth the casings of this rig...

  5. hindsight by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We didn't think we were doing anything pioneering at the time

    This is why the article we had yesterday, which argued that technological growth is slowing down, was a total hogwash. Technological growth is speeding up! What is constant is our inability to recognize great technological advancement except in hindsight.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:hindsight by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Saying that technological growth is slowing down or speeding up is total hogwash, in my opinion. The only way to measure technological growth is by placing arbitrary mile markers in the road. On one hand you have the folks that choose to measure technological growth by new inventions and can say that we are just polishing things that have already been invented. On the other hand, you have the folks that measure technological growth by its ubiquity, and show that more and more people are using more and more tech each year. Who is right, and who is wrong? I would submit that it is irrelevant and simply humans trying to place arbitrary classification on a complex system. We ought to just make sure that we are always doing our best to further the fields of science and technology, and not worry about whether our growth is faster or slower than in the past.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    2. Re:hindsight by tool462 · · Score: 1

      We ought to just make sure that we are always doing our best to further the fields of science and technology, and not worry about whether our growth is faster or slower than in the past.

      But then how would you collect funding for your cause of choice?

    3. Re:hindsight by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd say the biggest change since those days boils down to a single word....price. My first computer was a VIC20 which as you can see by the specs had a whopping 5k of RAM, and a whole 1MHz CPU. With the addons I paid close to $600 for it, and just recently I built a new machine for myself with dual 2500! MHZ CPUs, 8Gb of RAM (which is bigger than my first 4 HDDs put together) and nearly 1Tb of storage, all for a little less than I payed for the VIC. Even the smallest convenience store has computerized checkouts, and checking out of Walgreen's the other day I noticed they had MP3 players with larger storage than my first 2 HDDs for a whopping $15.

      When you add to this the lifespan of computers nowadays (I am typing this on a circa 2000 1.1GHz Celery Win2K PC that I use as a netbox) it has made truly incredible amounts of computing available to the masses. The rise of "cheap computing" has done more to shake things up than any particular CPU or other hardware released IMHO. Just the sheer amount of power folks get today is just insane, and the ability for anyone, no matter how much or little they make, still just blows my mind. Anyone today can have a PC powerful enough for desktop publishing, running mailing lists, pretty much any job the average Joe would ever care to do for little to no money (I often refurb older machines to give away and have a couple of 500Mhz boxes running mailing lists for local churches) has really changed things.

      In my youth computers were strictly for the hackers and those with the serious cash required to buy something with a GUI. Machines were expensive, proprietary as hell, hard to use, and often had to be programmed from scratch. Now even my nearly 70 Luddite father uses a laptop so he can "read the paper" using the wireless network I set up for him while he watches his NCIS from the couch. The amount of freeware and FOSS out there is just astounding, and there are literally thousands upon thousands of choices, from software to hardware, hell thanks to Linux and the BSDs even OSes. Maybe I'm just getting old and easily impressed in my advancing years, but if you would have told me that I'd have my oldest designing new levels for three dimensional video games on my hand me downs back then I'd have told you that you were insane, not just because of the kid. The amount of processing power we take for granted today or even pass down to our relatives when we get new toys to play with is just unreal, and that I think has changed the way we live more than anything else IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:hindsight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      humans trying to place arbitrary classification on a complex system

      That's what we do with literally everything, why should technology be different?

    5. Re:hindsight by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you are correct, it conversation is only reletive to the markers.

      Moores's law, for example, isn't holding up. Some people think that means technology is slowing down. Two totally different things. That's like comparing an apple to an apple farm.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:hindsight by geekoid · · Score: 1

      For that to be a proper comparison,. bot computers need to be on th same place on the technological curve. If the Vic was bought when it was at tyhe tope of the curve, then you ahve to compare that price to a computer that's at the top of the curve NOW.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:hindsight by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1

      One would be hard-pressed to claim that the VIC-20 was ever at "the top of the curve". It was always aimed at the home user/hobbyist, and was inexpensive at the time. Nonetheless, much more capable machines can be had today for seriously less money, particularly considering inflation.

    8. Re:hindsight by geezer+nerd · · Score: 2, Informative
      In my early days of computing, computers were very large machines which resided in purpose-built computer rooms with large glass walls allowing passersby to observe the whirling tapes and the blinking lights so as to properly "ooh" and "aah" over the marvels of cutting-edge technology. Thank goodness those days are long-gone.

      In the latter half of the '60s I had the good fortune to be able to use the most super-duper supercomputer of the time, the CDC 6600. For those who may not remember, the 6600 was one of the creations of the genius mind of Seymour Cray while he worked for Control Data Corp. I was going to write a tome about the machine, but I find the Wikipedia description (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDC_6600) is actually very good.

      Suffice it to say that with a max of 1.3million characters main memory, and a 10MHz clock frequency, it was the biggest, fastest computer on the block in its day. The computations I was doing for my thesis at the time went from 8 hours per point (CDC 1604) to 1 hour per point. That was a really significant boost.

      However, even back in the '90s, desktop PC hardware had improved (in capability and price) such that even a typical PC system would have a lot more power and capability than the 6600. Viva la difference!

    9. Re:hindsight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point of the post about speed of change. The author, quite rightly, highlights the total total technological changes. He pointed out, one only has to think of the period one's grandparents (say late 19th to early 20th Centuries, perhaps 1860 - 1930) lived. In that time span auto's occured, plans first flew, telephones arose, for the first time there was sound recording, the first television transmissions. That's just technological change, no mention of a Civil War, the first World War the beginings of what would lead to the second, ending of slavery and the vast solicial reforms. And of course the first efforts at electronic computers. Many grandparents would have seen many of those changes and man landing on the moon.

      Contrast that with the past 70 years, yes the ubiquity computers (who's change has been almost exclusively in speed) and atomic power. But set against the vast amount of prior change, we can see so little change by comparison.

  6. Vaccum Tubes? by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article is extremely light on details. Where are they going to get vaccum tubes or other antiquated apparatuses from? How much will they cost?

    1. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where are they going to get vaccum tubes or other antiquated apparatuses from? How much will they cost?

      I think many vacuum tubes are being manufactured in Russia right now, I know this from buying guitar amplifier tubes so I suspect that is where they will be sourced.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      How much will they cost?

      There is no greater wealth than wisdom, no greater poverty than ignorance; no greater heritage than culture and no greater support than consultation

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think many vacuum tubes are being manufactured in Russia right now, I know this from buying guitar amplifier tubes so I suspect that is where they will be sourced.

      That does raise the question of whether a computer built with vacuum tubes gives mp3 files a warmer sound.

      Or maybe not. ;-)

    4. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      That does raise the question of whether a computer built with vacuum tubes gives mp3 files a warmer sound.

      Sure, once the tubes are at operating temperature...

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    5. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are still plently of places in the UK that make these, admittedly most of the ones i know are hand-made for guitar amplifiers but they most certainly are made in the UK.

    6. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      That does raise the question of whether a computer built with vacuum tubes gives mp3 files a warmer sound.

      Nah, they are from Russia, nothing is warm there.

      Actually, the tubes give a cool sound, just be careful to don't get them clogged.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    7. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need the 4million dollar power plug and usb cords to really bring out the mid-range tones.

    8. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the thing uses dekatrons (ten cathode tube where pulse on guide electrode next to a cathode makes conduction jump to next cathode), which though not produced anymore are widely available. A computer made from them is much like a mechanical cash register with counting wheels. they are used by many hobbyists for clocks and other counting applications. no problem getting them

    9. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by JCCyC · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In Soviet Russia, tubes vacuum you!

    10. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vacuum tubes are manufactured near Elmira NY by Corning(?)... I believe MacIntosh still purchases tubes, as well as some other industries.

    11. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by isama · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia, the tubes play You!

    12. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Sure, once the tubes are at operating temperature...
      The joke didn't need explaining. Trust me.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    13. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that (like the colossus) it was mostly built using telephone exchange spare parts. Bletchley Park grabbed a couple of old telephone exchanges when they were being upgraded to digital in the early '90s to build their replica colossus. I'd guess they have a lot of spares lying around.

      There'll be some specialised bits that'll be hard to find (the memory tubes sound rare), but I wouldn't be suprised if they're hoping to do most of the work using parts they've got in stock. The relay boxes in the picture look exactly like the ones in the rebuilt colossus.

    14. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I think they have a lot of old stock too.. I ordered some nixie tubes on ebay from a guy in Russia a few years ago, and the box looked like it was at least 40 years old.
      this is the seller's ebay store - http://stores.shop.ebay.com/orehova__W0QQ_armrsZ1

    15. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Teresita · · Score: 1

      Actually it was the first web server, because as Ted Stevens said, the Internet is just a series of tubes.

    16. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      For best results, the power cable should be gold-plated and cost $200 or more.

    17. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      in Soviet Russia, YOU are 40 years old!

    18. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      thank you Ali ibn Abi Talib

    19. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      I *think* that the point is that it is already mostly complete: hence ""Britain's oldest *original* computer" (emphasis added). Other older computers exist in the UK, but they are replicas or re-builds.

    20. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1

      Isn't it the case that past projects to resurrect old computers have sometimes built vacuum-tube emulators out of solid-state technology and inserted them into the circuit when the particular vacuum tubes could not be found?

    21. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For best results, the power cable should be gold-plated and cost $200 or more.

      Can we upgrade it to Ethernet so we can use a Denon AKDL1 Cable on it?

    22. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      >Sure, once the tubes are at operating temperature...

      The joke didn't need explaining. Trust me.

      I actually thought value_added was having a crack at the audiophiles that describe sound produced through valve amplifiers as 'warm' as opposed to semiconductor amplifiers. I can understand the use of Valve amps in musical instruments because they are seeking the third harmonic distortion of the waveform produced by the musical instrument. In actuality the amplifier *is* part of the instrument.

      I work really hard with the bands I produce (I produce music) to create *exactly* the sound intended which is why I really appreciated value_added's comment. I find it tiresome when audiophiles use a valve amplifier in a domestic environment to produce a warmer sound, because they are introducing a third harmonic distortion that was not intended to be there when the album was recorded and produced.

      Sure audiophiles may argue that they can hear the 0.001% THD of a modern semiconductor amplifier but I've trained my ears *really* well and I've never heard it. Sure there maybe some argument for the temporal distortions that a semiconductor causes to the waveform but I've never had an audiophile even able to name that as the consequence of the transistors switching. I'm glad they love music but I often muse to myself if they were that committed to sound quality they would purchase a Class A *power* amplifier which would introduce no distortion at all.

      Ok, sorry that that was all very off topic but I thought it was the appropriate time to vent my spleen and share my bemusement.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    23. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by wv5k · · Score: 1

      Svetlana in Russia is still manufacturing many tubes that have high power applications, and there is still a large (but dwindling, kind of like the world's oil reserves) stock of most anything made since the 1940's scattered around the world. Of course, if worse came to worse, it's always possible to make your own, one by one. Search YouTube for vacuum tube sometime. There's a Frenchman who's posted several videos detailing the whole process...

    24. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      H'mm, while I agree with the sentiment, I wonder about the reasoning. For instance, some of the most linear power amplifiers I have ever seen used vacuum tubes. Vacuum tubes are inherently more linear than solid state devices. Granted, these amplifiers were 200 watts to 100 kW and were RF amplifiers, but that makes no real difference.

      Secondly, it has been shown via double blind testing that virtually no one can hear distortion if it is below about 1.5%. Fact is, most speakers produce more distortion than the connected amplifier, and yet, the amplifier is the target of very low distortion. (Probably because it is easy to make amplifiers reasonably linear, just by increasing the amount of negative feedback.

      Curiously, a measurably low distortion on an audio amplifier doesn't necessarily mean the Amp "sounds" good. I have actually demonstrated this myself, when comparing 4 different 200 watt (transistor) amplifiers. (Same speakers, pre-amps, just different power amps) All had distortion below/around 0.001%, yet they all sounded different. (And I have "tin" ears ...)

    25. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >I work really hard with the bands I produce (I produce music) to create *exactly* the sound intended
      It must be really depressing then to have the CD mastering wreck all that with over compression.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    26. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      H'mm, while I agree with the sentiment, I wonder about the reasoning. For instance, some of the most linear power amplifiers I have ever seen used vacuum tubes. Vacuum tubes are inherently more linear than solid state devices. Granted, these amplifiers were 200 watts to 100 kW and were RF amplifiers, but that makes no real difference.

      From my understanding this is a factor because audio power amplifiers (domestic and musical) introduce the third harmonic distortion as the tubes are being physically vibrated by the speakers that they are driving.

      Secondly, it has been shown via double blind testing that virtually no one can hear distortion if it is below about 1.5%.

      Agree.

      Curiously, a measurably low distortion on an audio amplifier doesn't necessarily mean the Amp "sounds" good.

      While I was at technical school doing electronics my teacher referred to analogue electronics as the artful form of electronics so you will find that there are many ways to screw up an amplifier in the design process, let alone having components that fall into a range of values instead of being a specific value, i.e resistors can have 10% or less tolerance, crappy capacitors, inductors, power supply issues the list goes on. Some people blueprint their amplifiers with closer tolerance components (like 1% or less tolerance resistors).

      What I'm saying here is that I'd expect you may even hear differences in 4 different amplifiers of the same brand and model (ok maybe not the same batch) especially if you consider that these amplifiers are going to have different characteristics in different frequency ranges. You may have had amplifiers where one had enough amplification in a certain frequency range that was just right to set up the standing waves for *your* room.

      My monitors have roll-off compensation for how far away they are from the wall, a corner and high and low frequency adjustment to match room characteristics. There is a phase adjustment between the sub woofer and the stereo monitors that is based on distance. All this has to be set-up *before* I crack open the measure microphone and start pumping out pink noise that is frequency adjusted for different ranges and that has to be set-up *before* I get to doing sound inversion tests to balance the computer pre-amps dac's, adc's. And I haven't even mentioned what I have to do to set the room up.

      Sure you are not going to go to that effort for a domestic system but the room and the amplifier both have there own characteristics. Your ears are probably better than you think they are. As long as they are fresh and rested I see no reason why with a little ingenuity, pink noise and some time you can't set-up you domestic system's equalisation settings to produce a quality listening environment. Setting them up first will do much more to improving the listening quality *before* the introduction of a third harmonic distortion that many audiophiles get a boner for.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    27. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      >I work really hard with the bands I produce (I produce music) to create *exactly* the sound intended

      It must be really depressing then to have the CD mastering wreck all that with over compression.

      my transient control is so practised that a mastering engineer would have to try real hard to fuck up my mixes. Even so, why take a chance, so I actually do the mastering to disc.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    28. Re:Vaccum Tubes? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Good news - Too many modern CDs are utterly wrecked in that final stage.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  7. Shutting down older hardware... bad idea. by marciot · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've found that for older hardware that is running fine 24x7, the worst thing is to shut it down. It invariably fails to start up again.

    1. Re:Shutting down older hardware... bad idea. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Invariably? As a former sysadmin for what was an eight year old VAX at the time, I can assure you that we were able to completely shut down the hardware at least once while I was there-- disks and everything. The VAX had been booted for over a year and the disks and controllers for THREE.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  8. Obligatory Bill Gates misquotation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    64 vacuum tubes ought to be enough for anyone.

  9. A joke my Dad told... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay.. I know that the premise of this joke is totally wrpng and UK scientists were computing pioneers, but it reminds me my favorite joke my father ever told me:

    Q: Why didn't the British never make a computer?
    A: They couldn't figure out a way to make it leak oil.

    (I think the joke is incorrect... probably on both counts).

    1. Re:A joke my Dad told... by maxume · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      There are all sorts of non sequiturs that fit in there:

      Q: Why didn't the British ever make a computer?
      A: Have you tried the food?!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:A joke my Dad told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a non sequitur. British cars and motorbikes of the period were infamous for leaking oil. They continued leaking oil until the British motor industry went tits-up in the 70s.

    3. Re:A joke my Dad told... by maxume · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Which modern computers rely on oil? Especially circulating oil.

      Idiot over-clockers don't particularly count.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:A joke my Dad told... by value_added · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A: They couldn't figure out a way to make it leak oil.

      And that's a bad thing?

      My first car was a 2-seater Triumph convertible. It suffered from electrical system problems, leaking hydraulics, and when it rained, the top would leak (even if you managed to snap all the buttons downs correctly). But was it fun! Wind through my hair, wet shoulders, the smell of hydraulic fluid dripping on my left shoe, being pulled over and cited for "overcrowding" when I had more than 3 passengers in the car ...

      The cars I've owned since have all been what you'd call dependable if not "top of the line", but I can't remember a single interesting about them.

    5. Re:A joke my Dad told... by mckinleyn · · Score: 1

      Joke, n.
      1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.

    6. Re:A joke my Dad told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there really people here who don't get the joke? British cars and Motorcycles were notorious for leaking oil.
      The joke goes...Question: How do you know whan your is out of oil?
                      Answer: When it stops leaking.

    7. Re:A joke my Dad told... by dpiven · · Score: 1

      Would leaky electrolytic capacitors count?

    8. Re:A joke my Dad told... by thebheffect · · Score: 1

      As a practical person, I prefer my car to be efficient in its abilities to get me to places I want to go, and its ability to not be a burden on my wallet. Ill trade 'interesting' for that any day.

    9. Re:A joke my Dad told... by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are there really people here who don't get the joke?

      Yes. But don't worry: I'm getting off your lawn.

    10. Re:A joke my Dad told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they were practicing that wonderful American school of Engineering that is Harley Davidson.

    11. Re:A joke my Dad told... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the WHOOSH, Lt. Commander Data.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:A joke my Dad told... by svtdragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My mother owned a Jaguar X-type from 2002 or so. I once read a review of it (this one, I think) and they made exactly this point:

      There was a time not long ago when Jaguars were stunningly beautiful, fantastic driving cars that were known to be fragile and unreliable. Jaguars were sexy but leaked oil. Jaguars were luxurious and emotional, but their windows often failed to go up or down. Jaguars were invigorating to drive but could leave you stranded on a cold morning.

      This Jaguar, the X-Type, is the opposite of those great Jags of the past. This car trades those wonderful qualities that made Jaguars cars to lust after and has replaced them with the bland reliability that makes Toyotas cars to lust after....

      Maybe we'd like it better if it leaked.

    13. Re:A joke my Dad told... by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M80eUcUVrmw Lame lameness filter is lame.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    14. Re:A joke my Dad told... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      +2 for the ST:TNG reference

    15. Re:A joke my Dad told... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      that wasn't a real Jaguar, that was made while Ford owned them.....

    16. Re:A joke my Dad told... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The explains why they were reliable at that time then, doesn't it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:A joke my Dad told... by dotgain · · Score: 1

      My Dad and Granddad -long time Jag aficionados - reckon Jaguar turned to shit a long time before then - when British Leyland took over.

    18. Re:A joke my Dad told... by tengwar · · Score: 1
      As opposed to a Hogley-Ferguson?

      You know why they reckon Harley riders ride in threes? One to work on the bike, one to pass the tools, and one to flag down passing riders for more hammers.

      (with best wishes from a Triumph rider)

    19. Re:A joke my Dad told... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Please explain the WHOOSH you see to me, so I can explain why you are wrong without making any assumptions.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:A joke my Dad told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup now the jag is just a ford with a big price tag

    21. Re:A joke my Dad told... by cailith1970 · · Score: 1

      Did you know that 80% of all Harleys ever made are still on the road?

      The other 20% made it home safely... :D

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
  10. Obligatory offtopic meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these...

  11. UK's oldest computer? by solevita · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought that Colossus would take this title? Not only is it older and British, but it's also (I'm told) the World's oldest electronic computer.

    1. Re:UK's oldest computer? by TobascoKid · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Harwell is still in one piece, the Colossus no longer exists (the Colossus at Bletchly is a replica). Also, the Harwell is a stored program computer (like all modern computers), Colossus isn't.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    2. Re:UK's oldest computer? by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      Colossus was the first (electronic digital programmable) computer, but none of the original machines survive. The Harwell apparently is the oldest original computer in the UK that is still around.

    3. Re:UK's oldest computer? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ANd I thought it was fistion:
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064177/

      And I'm pretty sure Colossus is Russian:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_(comics)

      I'm done...for now.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Original Punch Cards too? by realsilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For many of the younger generations of developers who don't know anything about these machines, it would be quite something to show them how the original developers used to work. It will also show how far we have advanced.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  13. primitive pr0n by syntap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We didn't think we were doing anything pioneering at the time

    Yeah, that's what the ASCII art inventors and the creators of GIF at CompuServ said.

    1. Re:primitive pr0n by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Or the owners of the first porn domain on the Internet!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  14. What? by Desler · · Score: 1

    UK's Oldest Computer To Be "Rebooted"

    Although not the first computer built in the UK

    How could it be the UK's oldest computer if it wasn't the first computer built in the UK?

    1. Re:What? by glop · · Score: 1

      Maybe the older ones are "dead"

    2. Re:What? by ciderVisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oldest surviving computer, perhaps ?

      --
      Squirrel!
    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK's Oldest Computer To Be "Rebooted"

      Although not the first computer built in the UK

      How could it be the UK's oldest computer if it wasn't the first computer built in the UK?

      Maybe the oldest was destroyed or is no longer around? Just speculating.

    4. Re:What? by Spad · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems to be predated in the UK by at least ENIAC, EDSAC and Baby, though not by a long time.

      I can't find anything written about it that implies anything particularly special about it that would allow it to be "first" in a given area.

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most pre-1960s computers were destroyed during RobotWars.

    6. Re:What? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Because "One of UK's oldest" or "UK's second oldest" just aren't sexy enough for headlines.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    7. Re:What? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The "older" computers have all been dismantled and the ones in museums are all replicas

      the Colossus MkI was upgraded to MkII
      All the MkII's were deliberately destroyed, except one, and that was thrown away by the secret services (who were using it)

      the Manchester M1's were all dismantled years ago.

      Nobody thinks heritage is important until it is old, and these early computers did not survive being obsolete long enough to get old and thought to be worth keeping, the ENIAC was for years thought to the the worlds first electronic computer, and only a few parts survive....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    8. Re:What? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was built in 1951 and used for teaching until 1973, and then donated to a museum, it is the earliest surviving British computer

      All the earlier ones (Colossus, Manchester M1 etc.. ) were destroyed, dismantled, or lost, just like their American counterparts (ENIAC etc ..)

      The earlier ones you can see in museums are all only parts, or reconstructions, this is a complete and when restored potentially working computer

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    9. Re:What? by mister_dave · · Score: 1

      The Leo 1 claims to be the 'first business computer'.

    10. Re:What? by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      it's the BBC, surely you can't expect them to report in proper English.

    11. Re:What? by hawk · · Score: 1

      The older computer, of course, was the ABC, from which the ENIAC borrowed heavily and then patented! The patents were later found invalid, due to the ABC.

      Several pieces of the ABC remain at Iowa State. Once Atanasoff (A) and Berry (B) were done with it, it was cannibalized for other projects.

      Two replicas were built in the late 90's, one of which was actually run a few times.

      hawk

    12. Re:What? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      > this is a complete and when restored potentially working computer

      You just gave a very correct description of the one-year-old 1000-node cluster I am now using at work :(

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  15. Modern Times by casals · · Score: 4, Funny

    "[...] the device was capable of doing the work of six to ten people [...]"

    Interesting to see how it changes over time. Today, considering the majority of jobs, you either cut off social networking access or you'll need six to ten people to do the work of two or three.

    --
    AT &F1DT0,T0800665544 - Real men, real help desk support.
    1. Re:Modern Times by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I know you are trying to be funny, but I was talking to some accounts about how computers ahve spead things up.

      We were remember where you would wait 90+ days for a new report, now it's a day, maybe.

      I mean, you would request a new report*, it would need to get approved, then several people would have to manually tabulate the date, then a typesetter would ahve to do a layout, then it would get a sample run, then approved, then supplies purchased and then it would get printed. The manually distributed to all the parties.

      barely even imaginable in today's world.

      *not an existing report with new data, but a whole new report. A report that had been created but needed a data update would be a measly 5-6 weeks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Modern Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've gone so far that we're buried in reports. We ask for all sorts of data, but so rarely get understanding to the point that I suspect we still have a 90 day turnaround from question to answer.

  16. What about Colossus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Colossus computer was operation by about 1944 5 years before the Harwell so um isn't that that oldest computer?

    1. Re:What about Colossus? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Colossus and it's succesors (Manchester M1 etc ...) are all destroyed, dismantled or lost, the ones in museums are all just parts, or replicas ... this is an original potentially working computer

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  17. computer, versus stored program computer, versus.. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's the problem of deciding what's a real computer-- do you include things that can crunch numbers, but have a hard-wired program, or have a program, but it's on a loop of paper tape, or have a program, but it's wired onto a plugboard. The Harwell machine is programmable, but the program is on a loop of paper tape, making anything other than one simple loop very problematical.

    Also its data storage is in a few cold-cathode Dekatrons, which are basically overachieving neon lights. They limit the counting-up speed to about 20,000 increments per second, just barely in the electronic realm, and much slower than anything using real vacuum tubes. And it uses a lot of mechanical relays, further limiting its speed and making it a very marginal computer in any modern sense of the word.

  18. Re:Vaccum Tubes from Russia by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Better watch out for trojans and backdoors in those tubes put there by the Russians, in case this computer were ever to be used against them in a war.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  19. You are entirely correct by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Informative
    The original US tube-based computer (I forget the acronym) had about 5000 tubes, each of which had a MTTF of around 2-3000 hours. Many people thought that it would break down too often to be of any use. But the designers had realised that what kills tubes is turnon (when the filament carries more current because it is low resistance) causing filament damage and thermal shock damage to the envelope. If the tubes were warmed up slowly and then left on all the time, there would be an infant mortality phase but then the machine would get more reliable with time as the tubes got into the depths of the bathtub life curve.

    Pedant note: although "all the time" or "always on" have more letters than "24x7", they are quicker to say and more meaningful. Why do we have this horrible cypher?

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:You are entirely correct by value_added · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pedant note: although "all the time" or "always on" have more letters than "24x7", they are quicker to say and more meaningful. Why do we have this horrible cypher?

      Pedant note: The term "cypher" is not a meaningful synonym for argot, cliche, neologism, colloquialism, expression, jargon, localism, newspeak, parlance, phrase, or vernacular (among others).

      That's not to say slipping in other people's mud isn't forgivable. ;-)

    2. Re:You are entirely correct by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      This was rediscovered by the US (ENIAC) in 1946 , those people at Bletchley Park discovered this and built a computer using the idea of not turning them off in 1943 ...Wartime Official secrets stopped them telling anyone ....

      The hardware people who discovered this were the Post Office (Telecoms) who used tubes for switching and knew the pitfalls ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    3. Re:You are entirely correct by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      Why do we have this horrible cypher?

      Because of the written part of our language.

    4. Re:You are entirely correct by mikew03 · · Score: 1

      Another important point, they used lower than typical voltage, this also contributed to extending the lifetime of the tubes.

    5. Re:You are entirely correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, people use words that are not technically correct intentionally to evoke a particular meaning.

      In this case, GP is implying that 24x7 is is a cypher, in that its meaning is difficult to deduce.

  20. Turing by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looking back, hardly any of us were computer literate and it's astonishing that we managed stored computing at all.

    Yeah, it's funny how that happens when you persecute your best people.

    I guess this was '49. But still. These guys are getting media attention while Turing rots in his grave.

    1. Re:Turing by ZosX · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's in a grave. Is he not supposed to rot?

    2. Re:Turing by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a troll among men.

      Take that as you will.

    3. Re:Turing by igb · · Score: 1

      I take it you're American? A little less hubris, please: how _is_ Robert J Oppenheimer's legacy looking?

  21. Live in the past.. by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    It's cheaper!

    And besides, the red Chinese invented the computer 3,000 years ago.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  22. Mathematical Calculations? No way! by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

    From the summary:

    It first ran in 1951 and was designed to perform mathematical calculations.

    Is there any computer that was designed to do anything else?

  23. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by dylan_- · · Score: 1

    Also its data storage is in a few cold-cathode Dekatrons, which are basically overachieving neon lights.

    I don't care. Cold-cathode Dekatrons are how everything should be stored!

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  24. Well, yes by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most modern computers (by quantity) are basically communications devices. Although we have converted the processes of communication to mathematical operations, this is to fit in with the way a computer works. We manage to speak to one another without the use of mathematics. We do not see the function of a mobile phone or a netbook as being "to perform mathematical calculations".

    Early data processing machines (like Hollerith card analysers) were designed to perform select and sort operations which they did using logical functions, but they did not do calculations. You wanted to know who in a brigade had a particular skill, you fed in the punched cards for the brigade, and the output stack delivered the ones whose holes coincided with the setup. Colossus was intended to do code breaking by high speed (for the time) data processing, but it did not do general purpose calculation. So yes, this is a meaningful distinction.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Well, yes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      computers only add.

      Yes, that IS correct. Everything else is interpretation and applying the math.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Obligatory? by unforkable · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia , Vaccum tubes manufacture you!

  26. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    WEll, I agree, they're cool looking. But to have your computing speed be limited by the de-ionization time of a gas is less than thrilling. You think a VAX-750 with ten users was slow.... :)

  27. On a related note... by billybob_jcv · · Score: 2, Funny

    Micro$oft recently released Harwell OS 7, which uses all of the available registers to create a waving M$ flag using the Harwell's front panel lights. Unfortunately, it has since been determined that the new OS really requires two Harwell computers wired in a parallel configuration to perform adequately. The M$ product manager for the Harwell OS stated: "The hardware requirements on the side of the box clearly state that one Harwell computer is the MINIMUM requirement, not the optimum configuration."

  28. Lets see how this bad boy handles today's porn! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Atomic program my ass... this mother fucker was used for hardcore mother fucking porn....

    Boot this bitch up and lets jack like its 1949.

  29. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    Given enough tape and enough time it is a universal Turing machine, so it can emulate any computer ... slowly ....

    Even ENIAC was a Turing machine and so could run anything ....it would be even slower and more cumbersome but could still run Linux!

    If you read the details then you will see that they left it running unattended over Christmas and the New year once and it did a lot of calculations in that time ... not just a "simple" loop ...

    Any machine that is Turing complete is a computer,

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  30. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when they replace the Dekatrons with some clever blue LED/capacitor/resistor arrangement (Diode Resistor Logic?!) and then we'll talk cool blinkenlights.

  31. leaps and bounds in advancement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone say that technological growth is slowing down... haven't they seen the Shamwow or the magic bullet II yet??? Those marvels of science could not be possible without such a giant leap into the future of technology! If more people would have recognized the value of that bionic ear piece sold on tv only, Billy Mayes wouldn't have had to yell so much and would still be introducing you to all the great marvels of today!

  32. Oldest? by mqduck · · Score: 1

    How about the Difference Engine?

    --
    Property is theft.
  33. Oh, it's all well and good by zorro-z · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's all well and good that Harwell has historic significance as the UK's oldest computer. What people want to know is: does it run Windows?

    --
    -Z
  34. Its first use by dogeatery · · Score: 1

    Its first use will be figuring out the secret ingredient in a Flaming Moe

  35. Yeah but watch out! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Soon someone will port Linux to it, as well as Doom. :)

    I heard that Vacuum tubes are rare to find and that Vacuum tube computers can be rewired to use Transistors instead when Vacuum tubes cannot be found.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  36. Yes, but... by Drone69 · · Score: 1

    will the Harwell be able to play Crysis? Better benchmark it with 3DMark first.

  37. Updates for your computer are available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They haven't turned it on in how long? Man, it's gonna take forever to download all the updates...

  38. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    >Even ENIAC was a Turing machine and so could run anything ....

    Anything that has a conditional skip and subtract and some memory is Turing-capable.

    The original ENIAC was only slightly better than this. And yes it could do "anything", for very limited values of "anything", as it only had like twenty ten-digit accumulators for memory and plug-wired-only programs.

  39. Drivers of technology... by mollog · · Score: 1

    One of the two big drivers of human effort; The first is weapons and military applications.

    --
    Best regards.
  40. Happy she is being restored. by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    Awesome news. I believe this computer used to belong to Wolverhampton University, however I have seen it in storage in Birmingham for years. Glad it is going back for restoration.

    1. Re:Happy she is being restored. by igb · · Score: 1

      I was in the warehouse for the Birmingham reserve collection last week. There's a lot of old computer iron: essentially most hardware Birmingham council had in the fifties and sixties. There's what appears to be most of a Ferranti Orion there, for example.

  41. Manchester Small-Scale Experimental Machine, 1948 by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Manchester Small-Scale Experimental Machine, aka the "Baby" Manchester Mark I, ran its first program in 1948. A replica was built in 1998 to celebrate its 50th anniversary.

    It had 32 words of 32 bits each and used a Williams Tube for memory.

    Opcode list:

    000 JMP S Jump to the instruction at the specified memory address (absolute unconditional jump)

    100 JRP S Jump to the instruction at the specified memory address plus the number in the accumulator (relative unconditional jump)

    010 LDN S Take the number from the specified memory address, negate it, and load it into the accumulator

    110 STO S Store the number in the accumulator to the specified memory address

    001 or
    101[t 1] SUB S Subtract the number at the specified memory address from the value in accumulator, and store the result in the accumulator

    011 CMP Skip next instruction if the accumulator contains a negative value

    111 STP Stop

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  42. Slashdot genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not think that "reboot" means what you think it means.

  43. Is there a point to technology museums by cmdotter · · Score: 1

    Like, I get that the Harwell has a bit of history and that it was a one-of-a-kind, but is that really a reason to keep it hanging around?
    Should Apple keep the first iPhone 3Gs developed and save it away for officianados of dust covered relics to revive it in 50 years time?
    Should Linus keep a machine running the first ever stable release of Linux?

    To me, I'm sorry to say, this is just daft. I certainly wouldn't presume that using tax payer dollars to fire up a relic is worthwhile. If I want to feel nostalgic, I'll look at some photos.

    The thing with I.T is that it's a progression. It's not as if it's a steam train, nor a hydrogen filled blimp, or the library of alexandria. It was a tool and it got superceeded.

    It's only when computers are no more that the Harwell will become interesting.

    2c

  44. But Does It Run... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    But does it run...Fortran?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  45. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you just look at which features were used first in the United States, and then declare that those are essential to the definition of the first "real" computer (or various other famous US inventions).

  46. UK wants a place in computing history? by Jewbird · · Score: 1

    Start by working on your definition of true and false. And don't give the Poles a work visa. They probably don't bring anything novel to Bletchley Park anyway.

    --
    For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods
  47. Re:computer, versus stored program computer, versu by gcobb · · Score: 1

    The Harwell machine is programmable, but the program is on a loop of paper tape, making anything other than one simple loop very problematical.

    So that's where the GTK guys got the idea!

  48. No, that's wrong by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    In fact, as you should know, everything in the way of computer hardware can be constructed from either nor or nand gates. These have no concept of addition, only two logical operations (or/and plus negation. Although boolean algebra is conventionally included in mathematics, it is actually the core discovery of computer science. Building on that, every arithmetic operation can be carried out by a suitable combination of logical functions along with a storage element - which can be physically implemented using logic devices, but is not conceptually so implemented.

    You cannot build a computer using nothing but addition.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  49. Still using in 1973? by MWYankee · · Score: 1

    Why were they still using it in 1973?