Slashdot Mirror


How a Team of Geeks Cracked the Spy Trade

drunken_boxer777 sends us to The Wall Street Journal for a lengthy article on a small tech company, Palantir Technologies, that is making the CIA, Pentagon, and FBI take notice. The submitter adds, "And yes, their company name is a reference to what you think it is." "One of the latest entrants into the government spy-services marketplace, Palantir Technologies has designed what many intelligence analysts say is the most effective tool to date to investigate terrorist networks. The software's main advance is a user-friendly search tool that can scan multiple data sources at once, something previous search tools couldn't do. That means an analyst who is following a tip about a planned terror attack, for example, can more quickly and easily unearth connections among suspects, money transfers, phone calls and previous attacks around the globe. ... With Palantir's software 'you can actually point to examples where it was pretty clear that lives were saved.'"

139 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Call me dense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But what is the reference?

    1. Re:Call me dense... by TypoNAM · · Score: 5, Informative

      This: Palentir

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    2. Re:Call me dense... by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 1

      Even for an AC, that's pretty bad. I think you owe us all a nerd card.

      --
      Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    3. Re:Call me dense... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's interesting in the context of this discussion that Tolkien's Palentir were more than just viewing devices. They could also be used to communicate with other stones, and I think for other purposes. Anyway, when one of the stones fell into evil hands, the Dark Lord was able to use his power over it to control anyone foolish enough to try and use one of the remaining stones.

      There's a lesson here I think.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Call me dense... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let me help you with that:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=palentir

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:Call me dense... by bugi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, it refers to Jack Palance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Palance

    6. Re:Call me dense... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      "In the Darkness...

      Bind them."

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    7. Re:Call me dense... by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Let me fix that for you....http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Palantir

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    8. Re:Call me dense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Question: Where in the Constitution does it say that "THEY" can't use aggregated multi-database search engines to investigate American citizens for no stated reason?

      Answer: It's under the 2nd amendment.

      As privacy is directly an implied tenet of the inalienable right of liberty we hold so dear, isn't it time we set about protecting it directly?

      It's far too easy to label someone a 'potential' terrorist and ruin their life. There's far too little recourse when this system is used in error.

      A police state is much more efficient than a libertarian society. Imagine the conveniences you could enjoy, locked up safely at home.

    9. Re:Call me dense... by Kugrian · · Score: 1

      Urgh, how troll? All the other replies that are on topic are links to the subject - I've given the information, short and succent, that can be scanned over if it is already known.
      Already biting. I give up.

  2. Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > ..a small tech company, Palentir Technologies..

    > ..Palantir Technologies has..

    > The submitter adds, "And yes, their company name is a reference to what you think it is."

    A spellcheck company?

    1. Re:Name? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And yes, their company name is a reference to what you think it is.

      Palin + Tar?
      Hmmmm

  3. Reference to LotR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was the seeing stone that Sauron used in Lord of the Rings.

    That is the tool the evil guy used to control the world. Sounds appropriate.

    1. Re:Reference to LotR by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks, my internet is down, I was unable to google that myself.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Reference to LotR by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      No, they were a gift from the Valar to the NÃmenÃreans to see other times and places.
      Sauron just happened to get a hold of one of them, and used it as an avenue to warp Saruman and Denethor's minds. There is no evidence he used the PalantÃr for their intended purpose.

    3. Re:Reference to LotR by hooeezit · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the FUD propaganda. The more balanced perspective is it's the seeing stone anyone could use to see their future. But it was put to evil purposes instead by Sauron.
      Technology by itself is not good or evil. It's how one uses it that makes it so. Remember that the Internet came out of a doom-and-gloom project to create a nuclear-war resistant communication network.

    4. Re:Reference to LotR by Abreu · · Score: 1

      And, in other news in the "that's obvious" department, Slashdot still does not have proper Unicode support!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:Reference to LotR by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was the seeing stone that Sauron used in Lord of the Rings.

      That is the tool the evil guy used to control the world. Sounds appropriate.

      The Palantir themselves were not evil, it was simply put to an evil purpose. The last surviving one was so corrupted by Sauron's influence it could never be used peacefully again but you can no more blame the Palantir for that than you could blame a wrench for becoming radioactive when left sitting next to a leaky reactor. Really, the only bit of truly evil magic in the entire book was the Ring itself and, seeing as it bore a measure of Sauron's own power, I think of it less as an object than as a character with a will and mind of its own.

      There is no evil in science, technology, or magic; evil lies not in the tool but the hand that wields it.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:Reference to LotR by primalamn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thanks, my internet is down, I was unable to google that myself.

      So how are you posting this?

    7. Re:Reference to LotR by alta · · Score: 1

      Mod -1, Unnecessary definition ;)

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    8. Re:Reference to LotR by mckinleyn · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*

    9. Re:Reference to LotR by Alphanos · · Score: 1

      The larger role played by a Palantir was the one used by Saruman. He was chief among the wizards sent to oppose Sauron and the forces of evil, but the knowledge granted by the stone corrupted him such that he turned against his order and sought power for himself.

      Even more appropriate.

      --
      Alphanos
    10. Re:Reference to LotR by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks, my internet is down, I was unable to google that myself.

      So how are you posting this?

      Probably using the legendary Posting Stone of Minas Wooshgul

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    11. Re:Reference to LotR by hoytak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks, my bookshelf fell down, and I was unable to read it myself.

      --
      Does having a witty signature really indicate normality?
    12. Re:Reference to LotR by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      cool, so we can all agree that anyone should be able to get automatic weapons? no? guess people are only willing to go so far down that road of "it's not the technology itself".

      Dr. Emmett Brown: I'm sure that in 1985 plutonium is available in every corner drugstore, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by. :p

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    13. Re:Reference to LotR by primalamn · · Score: 1

      HA!

    14. Re:Reference to LotR by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      no more than you could blame a wrench for becoming radioactive when left sitting next to a leaky reactor.

      Damn, I hate when that happens. They do bring good money at a garage sale though.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    15. Re:Reference to LotR by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      They were gifts from the Eldar to the Numenoreans. If I remember right, there's a line in The Silmarillion which implies that Feanor might have made them.

      There's a good story in Unfinished Tales about the use of the palantiri.

    16. Re:Reference to LotR by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      You are right, it was the Eldar, not the Valar.

      Also, unicode fail.

    17. Re:Reference to LotR by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      You can do your plumbing in the dark.

    18. Re:Reference to LotR by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Thanks, my internet is down, I was unable to google that myself.

      So how are you posting this?

      He's got the page saved offline. Duh. Geeze, don't some people think about what they're saying?

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    19. Re:Reference to LotR by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      That "whoosh" sound you hear is the sound of that Google query, by the way.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  4. Sounds like trojan spyware to me by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With a name like Palentir, it sounds like trojan spy program, not a Google like search tool.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  5. Great! by Saija · · Score: 3, Funny

    Palantir Technologies has designed what many intelligence analysts say is the most effective tool to date to investigate terrorist networks

    What? a crystal ball to fight the terrorist:

    A palantír (sometimes translated as Seeing Stone but actually meaning "Farsighted" or "One that Sees from Afar") is a stone that functions somewhat like a crystal ball.

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    1. Re:Great! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And creates a great risk of corruption among those who use it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Great! by jeffasselin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if you use it to chat with Ozzie Ozbourne on MSN Messenger.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    3. Re:Great! by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      Just as accurate, and far less intrusive than anything the DHS has come up with.

    4. Re:Great! by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

      > I just met this guy in the Palantir, he was like, really cool, but shy

      > But he wouldn't, like, send me his picture, only a flaming eye

      > So I asked "ASL?"

      > But he just said: "Build me an army worthy of Mordor"

      > and I was like "WTF? KThxBye!"

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:Great! by SBrach · · Score: 1

      You do know it isn't an actual cyrstal ball right???

    6. Re:Great! by KingPin27 · · Score: 1

      Silly goose!! Ozzy is too busy bashing skulls and casting AOE on WoW to be talking on MSN..... or don't you watch enough TV?

      --
      "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
    7. Re:Great! by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Ozzy's Acronym Flurry crits you for 173201 (161454 overkill).
      You die.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    8. Re:Great! by dwillden · · Score: 1

      And like most every other great and amazing new Intelligence Database system, it probably looks wonderful in the demonstrations but once deployed turns out to lack sufficient robustness or is too resource intensive to deploy it down to the level it's really needed at. Or it was just plain designed by someone who has no understanding of what is actually needed.

      These database's come and go, we barely get our people fully trained on the current one, and here comes a new gee whiz database app to save the world. Rather than sticking with one and fixing it's bugs and adding new capabilities, it's always jump to the new one, jump to the new one. ad nauseum.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    9. Re:Great! by discogravy · · Score: 1

      "i put on my wizard hat and cloak"

  6. Bad summary by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Informative
    The summary seems to be a description of a meta-search engine, which is rather common. (Dogpile).

    The actual product seems MUCH more interesting than the silly summary. It compartamentalizes secret info, so if you are classified for level 5, you can still search and find info that is level 6, even if the file also has level 4 information. It can also tag information so that if your level 5 clearance is not enough to tell you how person A is connected to person B, you can still know that the connection exists.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Bad summary by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The tech sounds quite interesting; but I'm not sure I love the idea of having intelligence agents operate on a "Yes, person A is linked to person B. You aren't allowed to know why; but the omniscient computer assures you that it is so." basis.

    2. Re:Bad summary by NoYob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The summary seems to be a description of a meta-search engine, which is rather common. (Dogpile).

      The actual product seems MUCH more interesting than the silly summary. It compartamentalizes secret info, so if you are classified for level 5, you can still search and find info that is level 6, even if the file also has level 4 information. It can also tag information so that if your level 5 clearance is not enough to tell you how person A is connected to person B, you can still know that the connection exists.

      Yeah, but if you are classified for level 5 and look at level 6, which presumably is above your classification, then you are in fact looking at classified work even if it has level 4 work - which means the levels of classification are being broken and the security is compromised. And if person A is a 5 and looking at classification 6 which is connected to person B it in effect blows any security clearances out the door. Of course, person C who is a 4 looking at person B who is a ....I've gone cross-eyed, dizzy and I'm nauseous.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    3. Re:Bad summary by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

      I think you're describing PL4 security. That's not the trick here. When they say different sources, they mean different TYPES of sources, geospacial, dates, ip addresses, telephone logs, video metadata, random XML, SQL. Dogpile searches multiple sources of unstructured text.

    4. Re:Bad summary by sukotto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Trust the computer. The computer is your friend. (There is no ultraviolet classification)

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    5. Re:Bad summary by steelfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all about need to know. If you knowing why is necessary to draw a conclusion, you'll eventually be granted this access.

      Under the old system, you outright wouldn't even know that a connection exists, nevermind whether you need to know whether that connection is important or not.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Bad summary by pnuema · · Score: 1

      This is a tool for intelligence analysts. They just write reports and hand them off to people who do have the clearance. I'd be willing to bet good money that the people who make operational decisions are not the ones using this tool.

    7. Re:Bad summary by rm999 · · Score: 1

      Why not, if it helps them do their job?

      I feel like there is an implicit assumption on Slashdot that government agents don't know how to do their jobs properly, even though we know very little about what they do.

      And then we complain when lay people assume tech/IT people don't know how to do their jobs correctly.

    8. Re:Bad summary by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I think in his example, he thought that Level 5 was higher than Level 6. Level 1 was the most secret. At least, that's what seems to make sense to me.

    9. Re:Bad summary by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Time to start staying alert, trusting no one, and keeping my laser handy.

    10. Re:Bad summary by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The point still stands whether 4 or 6 is more secret

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    11. Re:Bad summary by Dravik · · Score: 1

      The difference is: All earlier implementations would apply the classification to a whole document or report, this implementation tags the specific facts or segments that hold classification levels. Many times a classfied report will only have a single sentence or paragraph that is really sensitive. This new tool appears to allow a person with a low to mid level clearance to search the large percentage of a sensitive report that isn't to sensitive for them to see. Another way to approach it: Previously the whole report would be denied to anyone not cleared to read the complete report. This tool allows automatic redacting, and thus to release of most of the data in a report to someone not cleared to read the whole thing.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    12. Re:Bad summary by kcitren · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is S/SCI, it's just not used very often. Palantir is a nice app, basically an improved Axis Pro or Analyst Notebook.

  7. The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by reporter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When you aim the Palantir tool at terrorists, you can easily identify useful patterns in disparate data. These patterns reveal information about the names and the plans of the culprits.

    What happens when you aim the same tool at ordinary people like Slashdotters? You will discover sexual orientation, adultery, etc.

    In other words, the same tool saving us from the terrorists can also defeat the last barriers protecting our privacy. If an intelligence officer in the government hated a particular SlashDotter (due to her articles in this forum), that officer could easily identify her address, her friends, her bank accounts, her adulterous lover, etc. Can you say, "blackmail"?

    1. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      SlashDotter (due to her articles in this forum)

      "Her" on slashdot? What do you mean?

    2. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Dancindan84 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If an intelligence officer in the government hated a particular SlashDotter... her friends... her adulterous lover

      A female SlashDotter with friends and a lover... it would take a top tier spy tool to find that unicorn.

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Its funny you mention that, I had the asFasBasI (remove the as) come to my house over a slashdot post I made. They were not happy about my criticism of their organization .

    4. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by oldhack · · Score: 1

      ... ordinary people like Slashdotters ...

      Interesting sequence of words there. Wonder what it means.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    5. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Carbaholic · · Score: 1

      How much does the tool cost and where can I find one?

    6. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No software cannot determine your sexual orientation, nor your hidden adultery. It does not read minds, or hearts. It does not magically know events from the past or the future.

      Now, if you went online and posted about your homosexual adulterous relationship on a board that publicly reveals your IP address, then yes, a tool could indeed find it. In that case, who defeated the last barrier of your privacy? Did the tool? Or is it your own darned fault?

    7. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our tax dollars at work. But seriously, I call bullshit. Don't be tryin' to scare people.

      Myself and others have talked tons of trash about the U.S. intelligence agencies and leadership on Slashdot and in real-life. The American intelligence agencies would have to be hard-up for funding and job security if they're going to data-mine Slashdot and then go on fishing expeditions to try and find voices of dissent.

      I noticed that none of the info in TFA involved plots within the U.S., just "western targets" overseas. Yawn, public plots to kill westerners in the Middle East are a dime a dozen. We see what a fat lot of good that's doing us, in fact our best solution there just to throw enough money at people to get them to turn snitch. All they really want is to feed their families. If you'll notice, that's also the tactic-du-jour stateside: throw money at snitches(many of them already caught and snitching for a break or lower sentence) and proxies just like the RIAA did with MediaSentry. In short, the American intelligence services are a clusterfuck of corporate bureaucracy and dangerous outsourcing and they should be disbanded and rebuilt from scratch. The CIA's resistance to the recent disclosure of their torture techniques on the grounds of "national security" and "harm to the intelligence community" are an insult to our intelligence.

    8. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Which is why it's a good idea to use separate identities everywhere and keep them separate and distinct.

      It's rather difficult and annoying as hell, but that's if you want to be safe. The paranoid will go as far as to access these separate identities from entirely separate systems. Certainly, their access patterns may be similar or the same, but that's only if they can make that connection.

      The other thing to do is to change your speech patterns for each identity. The idea is to try to mimic the general speech pattern of the site, and try to insert as little of your own "raw" thoughts as possible. If you do an analysis of people's speech habits, it's only a matter of finding and using outliers to detect possible matches between users of different sites.

      If you're only partially paranoid, the easiest way is to use TOR for speech and activities that might appear disruptive (politically charged, lawsuit bait, etc.) and use your normal connection to surf normally. Or go to sites that don't keep logs of IP addresses.

      But like anything that falls under information security, it only takes one mistake, one hole, to compromise a locked-down system.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    9. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You don't watch much late night television, do you? Act now, and for the special price of $19.95, not only will we send you the Palantir, but we will throw in your very own Special Agent Koworski and not one, but TWO spy decoder rings!!! Call now! That's 1-800-GUL-IBLE

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Adultery? You mean like using your other hand?

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    11. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      Who will babysit the babysitters....?

    12. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No software cannot determine your sexual orientation, nor your hidden adultery. It does not read minds, or hearts. It does not magically know events from the past or the future.

      I do not know that you can definitively say that. What the tool can ferret out is going to depend on what data it has, how much data it has and the quality of that data.

      Does the tool have access to credit card data? Does the tool have access to hotel reservation data? Car rental data? Flight reservation data? Phone records? Movie rental data? Other data types too numerous to list that do exist and that the government might get access to?

      Given enough data I don't think anyone can say with absolute certainty that past events cannot be dug out of the data set. Ditto for sussing out probable very near term events based on past events given the proper data in a timely fashion, time to find connections and then bringing those to someone's attention.

      Think things like travel plans, especially those made regularly or semi-regularly. Sure, you could say that someone could figure that out on their own, but that would take time. Throw in software that finds those patterns on its own and it becomes a lot easier to do. The software might even shed light on the cause of the travel.

      When Person A receives a phone call from number N or an email from address E prior to the last weekend of the month then there is a 75% probability person A will travel to city C and stay in hotel H. Now add in that person B is tied to phone number N and email address E and has the same 75% probability to travel to city C and stay in hotel H...

      Now add in a person to see those patterns and look at them and then drill down to the source data that led to the software making those conclusions and also looking into related data.

      Think that person might just figure something out? I think there's a pretty good chance they'll learn something.

    13. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      That's a comment deserving of a +5 insightful.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:The Palantir Tool is a Double-Edged Sword by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Interesting perspective.

      Yes, some data could be gleaned indirectly. I'm not so convinced that such a tool is really possible, but maybe one day we will have enough behavioral knowledge that we can code it into a program and make it guess your fetishes.

  8. Name... by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    Hayden Panettiere ?

    Ok, well thats the first thing that came to my mind...

  9. Re:Palin? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, it's a Tolkien reference. IOW, they really are geeks.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  10. They were messing with him by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    "Hi, I'm Alex Karp," Mr. Karp said, offering his hand. No response. "I didn't know you really don't ask their names," he says now.

    Real spies have fake names and ids. There's no reason not to give the guy a name, as long as everyone in the room isn't named "Bob".

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:They were messing with him by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      But that would run the risk of blowing that fake name's cover. Of course, he should have been able to just make something up on the spot..

    2. Re:They were messing with him by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      what cover? It's like tech support, except that everyone in tech support is named bob.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  11. Gee it's almost impressive..... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    There has been this notion that somehow if you can shove a bunch of data through algorithms that somehow you can catch terrorist networks.

    More likely you're just wasting time and here's why: terrorists don't act or usually exhibit predictable and trackable behavior like normal people. Typically they deal with disposable cell phones, cash and other "untrackables".

    These guys have managed to come up with Yet Another Terrorist Tracking Tool®

    1. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but as TFA points out, the people they're looking for often do things that should get them caught, like using the same address and phone number when buying the plane tickets in the case of the 9/11 hijackers. The basic idea is to find a better way to process the data they already have, and to give people the ability to process data that will help them, even when they don't necessarily have access to it (ie the use of data classified at a level higher than the searcher has access to).

      The problem generally hasn't been (so far anyway) that the data wasn't there, it was just that no one had the time or ability to process the information in a useful manner to make these connections. Supposedly this tool does a much better job of it than previous tools, but even if it does, we probably won't hear much more about it either way.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by brainboyz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except, despite all of this, they still exist in a trackable world. They live and have stuff delivered to addresses, they access information that leaves a data trail, and use identifiers which do the same. If they share anything, or a field observer notices a meeting then it gets tagged as a meeting and connection; then any activity at all is tracked back to a single node (bank account, address, person, phone number, etc) then you can link ALL connected nodes to that activity. Cash, disposables, and other "untrackables" still have temporary information: GPS on phone calls, messages intercepted with keywords or names, or phone numbers used for a material order. The info might not be permanently valid, but the connections it makes between nodes are.

    3. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by alta · · Score: 1

      If you can even USE the word 'Typically' about something, your are implying that they do something often enough to make it traceable. Then you further your anti-argument by giving examples such as disposable cell phones.

      Very interesting. You must be a terrorist posting disinformation.

      Or maybe I am for pointing it out ;)

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    4. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Your post is not only ill-informed, but totally illogical. Which is it, are terrorists unpredictable (which itself is a pattern) or do they exhibit certain typical behaviors?!

      Never too late to read TFA, you know...

    5. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by whiteknight37 · · Score: 1

      There has been this notion that somehow if you can shove a bunch of data through algorithms that somehow you can catch terrorist networks. More likely you're just wasting time and here's why: terrorists don't act or usually exhibit predictable and trackable behavior like normal people. Typically they deal with disposable cell phones, cash and other "untrackables".

      Looks like someone didn't actually read the article...

    6. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be "Yet Another Terrorist Tracking Apparatus", or "YATTA!" for short? Or is that the Japanese version?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    7. Re:Gee it's almost impressive..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      More likely you're just wasting time and here's why: terrorists don't act or usually exhibit predictable and trackable behavior like normal people ... These guys have managed to come up with Yet Another Terrorist Tracking Tool®

      I know a guy in the crime analysis business who told me that many criminals are stupid. If they were smarter, they'd get a real job. Thus, there's lots of low-hanging fruit. Even if only 20% of criminals are stupid enough to leave obvious clues or patterns, the use of such tools is still justified.
           

  12. Governmentsss spying on their own citizensss ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... we hatesss it, Preciousss, yesss we doesss.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  13. A double edged sword by Knara · · Score: 1

    After all, all the Seeing Stones are not yet accounted for. Who knows who might be watching?

  14. Splunk! by alta · · Score: 1

    Cool, so they just invented Splunk! Cool. Is it any cheaper than splunk, because if it is, I'll use it.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  15. Re:"Perhaps they should call it "One Ring"? by castironpigeon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In case you forgot the term engineer originally applied to constructors of military engines. Engineers have a long and healthy tradition of being clever and morally bankrupt.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
  16. TOTALLY NOVEL! by belphegore · · Score: 1

    > The software's main advance is a user-friendly search tool that can scan multiple data sources at once, something previous search tools couldn't do

    OMG! Did someone finally discover the hidden "UNION" conjunction in SQL?

    1. Re:TOTALLY NOVEL! by mjs_ud · · Score: 1

      If I were them I would be careful letting people know they are using multiple data sources, I heard its patented. http://techdirt.com/articles/20090831/0308556054.shtml

      --
      return EXIT_SUCCESS;
  17. Starlight! by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    This sounds similar to Starlight, which the NSA uses for all kinds of "connect the dots" type intelligence activities.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:Starlight! by elblanco · · Score: 1

      This sounds similar to Starlight, which the NSA uses for all kinds of "connect the dots" type intelligence activities.

      In my experience Palantir has a lot to offer. But Starlight is definitely the more powerful tool. I've even seen cases where Starlight handled all of the data processing and analysis work before it was fed into Palantir since it's capabilities where so much better.

  18. Re:All we need by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    You mean like Honduras?

    --
    What?
  19. So CIA and FBI tech enters the 90's. huzzah! by leftie · · Score: 1

    CIA and FBI computer systems are infamously way, way behind. They only got wikis in 2006. Now they can finally google something.

  20. Uhh... No. Wrong perspective... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good guys used it too. To defeat Sauron AND to "keep the world safe".

    In fact... Good guys made all 7 Palantir mentioned in LotR.
    Sauron got his hands on one of those and used it to corrupt Saruman and Denethor.

    So... No. It is not "the tool the evil guy used to control the world."
    The message would be that "power corrupts". In this case - power in the form of knowledge or information.

    What Palantir really lacked was a decent firewall. No protection whatsoever.
    Very intuitive user interface though. And they were practically indestructible.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Uhh... No. Wrong perspective... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      The dwarves drilled three holes in one of the 7 and used it to bowl the first perfect game in Middle Earth history.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    2. Re:Uhh... No. Wrong perspective... by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      Denethor was never corrupted. He fell into despair.

  21. Re:Palin? by alta · · Score: 1

    Please turn in your geek card.

    You obviously didn't READ the books. I could see you missing it if you only saw the movies, since they almost never, if at all, called it by name.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  22. Re:Palin? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not like as though the company was named "Rusty Trombones Inc." or something

    That would be a Commander Riker reference?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  23. Technology to translate Ozzy would be huge leap by leftie · · Score: 1

    The only person right now who can make anything out of anything Ozzy is muttering is Sharon. Technology that can translate Ozzybabble would be a huge leap forward.

  24. Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Palantir is a startup with Clarion (a hedge fund) VC backing. Clarion is now using their connections to showcase their holding via the WSJ. Sounds like Clarion is trying to dump their investment and cash out.

  25. Re:"Perhaps they should call it "One Ring"? by Punko · · Score: 1

    Thankfully, engineering was split into military and civilian engineering a loooong time ago. Software engineering is simply a recent offshoot from civilian engineering which has been split to the vast number of engineering disciplines we know today. As for being clever and morally bankrupt, engineers are clever. As for morally bankrupt, perhaps is not the tool that is morally bankrupt, but rather the uses it is put to. You cannot claim that the design of a passenger aircraft is morally bankrupt, and yet without that design, a lot of bad things would not have happened in they way they happened.

    It is acceptable to say that some technological advances have no purpose or meaningful reason to exist other than morally bankrupt ones, but thankfully, they are few and far between.

    --
    If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
  26. Re:Palin? by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... a badly written child's fantasy world ....

    Now now, Tolkien's Middle-earth was a badly-written ADULT'S fantasy world.

  27. This would be the first time... by copponex · · Score: 1

    This would be the first time that the US would be acting in the interests of a democratic movement in Latin America rather than in direct opposition. I'm highly skeptical of any action taken by the State Department, but it seems that the Organization of American States support reinstatement of Zelaya with conditions before the elections, as well as the citizens of Honduras itself.

    That's why there's no good press. Supporting democracy is protecting the monarchy in Saudi Arabia, and overthrowing governments across the world which have any self-interest that is in opposition to American power. Supporting democracy is declaring war in the outdoor prison in Gaza when they don't vote the way you want them to. Supporting democracy is when you send in guerrilla forces to Latin American countries, where nuns are gang raped for 24 hours while CIA interrogators coach their students on how to get more information, where priests who oppose American sponsored violence are gunned down while they give Mass on Sunday mornings, and where decades of warfare, destruction, and misery are considered progress.

    American businesses don't get to make any money when they don't control puppet governments or subsidize weapons to the "freedom fighters" with our tax dollars. So, I remain skeptical on why the State Department wants this guy back in office, but the fact the Fox News is against it gives me some hope.

  28. Re:All we need by Abreu · · Score: 1

    Exactly.

    For those in the US who may have not heard about it, the Honduran conservatives the Army and Congress kidnapped the democratically-elect president and deported him to Costa Rica, taking over the goverment and repressing those who dissented.

    Everybody, except the US, is calling it a military coup d'etat

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Honduran_constitutional_crisis
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reaction_to_the_2009_Honduran_military_coup

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  29. Thanks, but then it brings up a new problem by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
    Fact A can be Secret
    Fact B can be Top Secret and
    Fact C can be confidential
    Sometimes taking C and then correlating to something with A+B (with the B removed) will then result in TS (same as B). So, I'd think it's a touchy area. In the 90s a similar "classification by association," was commonly referred to as Elements of Essential Friendly Information (EEFIs), such as a recall roster and leave schedules. If the enemy has the recall roster and suddenly one particular part of a unit gets a 3-ring recall to report for duty, you've got a tip off and good information on what's likely to happen. For example, I knew when the 2nd Gulf War was going to start (within a small window) when I saw something I'd never seen before: A large number of stealth bombers out of their hangars, and taking off in Missouri. You'll notice we now keep some deployed overseas so there's not as easy of a single telling point. With intel, it's the same.

    However, getting back to the article, I'm 100% supporting them. I'm a Defense Contractor and I'm tired of incompetent retired mid-/senior officers who get a paycheck for their former rank and do nothing to really make an acquisition program work. On the same note, you've got officers in Program Offices as a PM who will never be held accountable or benefit from his decisions. I could go on with examples, but I think this company has a hard battle ahead but likely brings a great, fresh, greatly needed new perspective. Our government is hurting badly in many areas, and this is a small step to help make a small part of it better. If we can just get more of these going...

  30. badly written? by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i'm guessing you thing Twilight and Harry Potter are works of genius?

    i'm surprised more people haven't taken your flamebait.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    1. Re:badly written? by prichardson · · Score: 1

      OMFG Twilight is the best book ever.

      ...

      SATIRE ENDS HERE.

      I'm sorry, I know nothing of the books other than the premise and the target market and their extreme popularity. I really have no solid evidence that they are good or bad.

      That said, I know they must be absolutely terrible.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
  31. Re:All we need by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    Except that the president himself violated the constitution, an act that called for his removal from power (even though a means of removal from power was not defined in the constitution). He did this to remove term limits and instill himself as president for life, subverting democracy in the process. Did you know that the referendum he called for had ballots stuffed with winning number of vote? Even though the referendum was never actually voted on? How about that the nations democratically elected congress and legitimate supreme court were the ones to call on the military to remove Zelaya for his crimes? The issue here is that the Honduran constitution was self contradictory, calling for removal of a president without a formal impeachment process.

  32. ECHELON by iron+spartan · · Score: 1

    So is this a civilian version of ECHELON? Or a tool to sort through all the data that ECHELON collects?

  33. They're also disingenuous astroturfers. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They've plastered the Pentagon with banners practically claiming they single-handedly brought down GhostNet when they were at best on the periphery of the rather large collection of organizations responsible for it.

    1. Re:They're also disingenuous astroturfers. by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      That was last month, the banners all over the Pentagon metro station are more generic "our contractinng firm supports the military" this month.

      I kind of miss the Panasonic Toughbook banners.

  34. Re:"Perhaps they should call it "One Ring"? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    "Thankfully, engineering was split into military and civilian engineering a loooong time ago."

    You are high, right? Smoking something really strange? There is as much separation between military and civilian engineering as there is between military and civilian written languages. That is to say, there is precious little that can't be interchanged.

    Trick question: In a group of people including a waitress, a secretary, a construction worker, a doctor, and a professional wrestler, who is likely to know the simplest, fastest, and easiest way to kill a human being?

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  35. Re:All we need by Abreu · · Score: 1

    The president's opponents claim he intended to remove reelection limits, but there is no proof at all of this.

    The fact that the Honduran constitution had no impeachment procedures is just another proof of the fact that it needed to be revised and rewritten!

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  36. Re:Palin? by alta · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not sure WHY it's a requirement, but it has become one, de facto. You don't have to think it's great, or even like it at all, but just about every 'geek' has read it, regardless of what they thought about it.

    And I WOULD say it's a child's fantasy world. It was written with his son in mind partly while he was in the trenches in WW1. Additionally he was a good friend of C.S. Lewis, who also wrote what I would call children's books.

    http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/news/2003/aug29.html

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  37. Re:Palin? by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

    I read the books... 8 years ago.

    Seeing as how the first 3 comments (including mine) are of the form "What's the reference?" and the 4th is of the form "The reference is..." I believe you're requiring %90 of /. must turn in their geek cards.

    Either that or kdawson is an epic troll.

  38. Re:All we need by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    regardless of his intention (and yes there is evidence he was intenting to change term limits, see the ballot boxes stuffed with fake votes), it was illegal for him to have called for any referendum to change the constitution while in office. He had to be removed.

    And yes, you are very much right about the constitution needing a provision to remove a criminal president from power. Sometimes even that is not enough, as the first 8 years of this century have shown in the US.

  39. Re:All we need by tibman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought it went down differently than that. Zelaya was trying to rewrite the constitution to allow him more than two terms as president, a step in the direction of dictatorship.

    A judge issued a warrant for his arrest because he had no right to call a vote to rewrite the constitution. The military followed the Judge's order but expelled him from the country instead of arresting him. They later said they did this to prevent his followers from getting access to Zelaya.

    The military was never in charge of the government.. with the order for removal of the President, the Vice President was promoted to full president. The current president of Honduras did not claim power, it was thrust upon him by the line of succession.

    The same thing could happen in the United States.. the Military swears an oath to the Constitution FIRST, then the president. The process to remove the president from power would be different though. He would have to be impeached.. which again comes from the judicial side of the house. The Chief Justice would preside over it and congress would do the voting.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  40. Re:Palin? by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please turn in your geek card.

    No, that would be nerd card. Geeks have social skills.

    You obviously didn't READ the books.

    neither did I. I tried - I really tried.. but they were so horribly boring and long-winded it was impossible for me to make it through even part of the first one.

    Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?

    A by Tolkein: The chicken, sunlight coruscating off its radiant yellow-white coat of feathers, approached the dark, sullen asphalt road and scrutinized it intently with its obsidian-black eyes. Every detail of the thoroughfare leapt into blinding focus: the rough texture of the surface, over which countless tires had worked their relentless tread through the ages; the innumerable fragments of stone embedded within the lugubrious mass, perhaps quarried from the great pits where the Sons of Man labored not far from here; the dull black asphalt itself, exuding those waves of heat which distort the sight and bring weakness to the body; the other attributes of the great highway too numerous to give name. And then it crossed it.

  41. Actually It Works Like This... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Actually their software works like this:

    1: Announce software that will bust terrorist networks.
    2: Only terrorists buy software to test out their own network security.
    3: Software phones home.
    4: PROFIT!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  42. Be careful by kriston · · Score: 1

    Just be careful not to have your name mentioned in the same document with a bad guy's name in it. This technology really is that simple and that dangerous.

    --

    Kriston

  43. Re:All we need by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Was Mohammed Atta a sovereign nation? Because he's the type this is aimed at.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  44. Turbo Hearts by lucky130 · · Score: 1

    There is a particularly entertaining game mentioned in the video called "Turbo Hearts", which rules.

    I found this good explanation of how to play:
    http://ericanderson.us/2009/09/04/how-to-play-turbo-hearts/

  45. Re:Palin? by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps children's and adult's fantasy worlds are not really that different.

  46. Re:Palin? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    I'm with you, and I love fantasy and sci-fi books (I've read the entire Wheel of Time, Swort of Truth, Hitchhiker, Foundation, Interview w/ the Vampire...but after reading LOTR, I couldn't find the motivation to pick up another one.

    PS. "The Name of the Wind" is a good book I just finished.

  47. Pretty Amazing by acid06 · · Score: 1

    If you ignore all the "catch terrorists" mambo jumbo, this is probably the most advanced and outright awesome data mining tool I've ever seen.

    Take a look at the videos on their blogs - the "Palentir Financial" videos are particularly worth it.

  48. Re:Palin? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    FWIW, LOTR is easy to read if you skip the songs, the chants, and the history lessons. It's a relatively small part of the bulk, but nearly 100% of the purple prose.

  49. Re:Palin? by Incadenza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and the battles. When I saw the movies and the battles started rolling, I had a vivid memory of how boring I had found these in the book too (and that was 25 years in the past)

  50. The Build Contraption by fatblunt · · Score: 1

    Hah, a friend of mine built the red light and bubble machine. Neat to see it on the WSJ.

  51. Re:"Perhaps they should call it "One Ring"? by jasno · · Score: 1

    http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/masters-war

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
  52. Re:Palin? by jbezorg · · Score: 1

    So, the Good Parts version?

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  53. Re:Palin? by neurovish · · Score: 1

    Please turn in your geek card.

    No, that would be nerd card. Geeks have social skills.

    You obviously didn't READ the books.

    neither did I. I tried - I really tried.. but they were so horribly boring and long-winded it was impossible for me to make it through even part of the first one.

    Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?

    A by Tolkein: The chicken, sunlight coruscating off its radiant yellow-white coat of feathers, approached the dark, sullen asphalt road and scrutinized it intently with its obsidian-black eyes. Every detail of the thoroughfare leapt into blinding focus: the rough texture of the surface, over which countless tires had worked their relentless tread through the ages; the innumerable fragments of stone embedded within the lugubrious mass, perhaps quarried from the great pits where the Sons of Man labored not far from here; the dull black asphalt itself, exuding those waves of heat which distort the sight and bring weakness to the body; the other attributes of the great highway too numerous to give name. And then it crossed it.

    You left out the part where the chicken bursts into a song for 5 pages.

  54. Re:"Perhaps they should call it "One Ring"? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

    Construction worker.

    Drop a bridge on 'em.

  55. Re:Palin? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you're not mistaking Wheel of Time with Lord of the Rings? Really the basic trilogy are pretty thin books considering what all gets accomplished. Now a Wheel of Time book can take 1000 pages to tell you one day's worth of events. Or a whole chapter to describe a dress.

  56. They have this to... by doronbc · · Score: 1

    It's called Limeware, or Frostwire FTE
    "Along with the safe house location, the LimeWire networks also disclosed presidential motorcade routes, as well as sensitive but unclassified document that listed details on every nuclear facility in the country." - http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/29/205207

  57. Re:Palin? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Try "Bored of the Rings."

  58. What "terrorist attacks" exactly? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I stopped taking people seriously who mention them.

    Everyone who can't remember that in the same freaking week that 9/11 happened, tenthousands of Indians died in a landslide: Don't *dare* to ever mention "terrorist attacks" again!

    Or how about the banking scam attack that threw the whole global economy in a recession? Or do you still think that was no deliberate attack?

    Etc, etc, etc.

    I think we have bigger things to fix, than to use "terrorist attacks" as an excuse to create attacks on our nations values, so big that those terrorist attacks look like freaking jokes in comparison!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  59. Who's the geek? by 0x15 · · Score: 1

    I was going to say that I'm really getting tired of the 'geek' and 'nerd' terms. But after reading several of these posts, never mind. :) Anyway, I don't understand why we still put up with those labels. The Palantir team is making a contribution. More than I can say for the WSJ geeks. Hell, they can't even make money off of advertising.

  60. Re:Palin? by G04T · · Score: 1

    Now a Wheel of Time book can take 1000 pages to tell you one day's worth of events. Or a whole chapter to describe a dress.

    While I would agree in general with your assertion, I've read the first 10 books of The Wheel of Time, twice, and could NOT get through the first 200 pages of Fellowship. It's the difference in the writing style that gets me. Robert Jordan wrote with an almost Southern (U.S.) style of description, very laid back, not thick enough that you need waders to get through. Tolkein's was very stiff and British.

    What drove me nuts was when he (Jordan) would describe a character and then bring the character back several books later and you were supposed to remember who it was, what they had done, and things they had said all based on a physical description. THAT was annoying. "Wait, this old, bald dude sitting on the barrel is apparently someone we are supposed to remember since there is so much focused on him... now, which book was he in last time?"