Slashdot Mirror


Exoskeletons For Rent In Japan

destinyland writes "Cyberdyne has started renting their exoskeleton body suits in Japan. The mind-controlled wearable machine increases strength and endurance, and rents for $2,300 a month. (Sensors on the skin detect traces of nerve signals from the brain, synchronizing the power suit's movements with the user's own limbs.) New video shows the suits in use on the streets of Tokyo, and the concept may be catching on. DARPA now has a program called Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation 'to develop devices and machines that will increase the speed, strength and endurance of soldiers in combat environments.'"

226 comments

  1. HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How is this not a joke?

    1. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's not a joke, but it is old news. Other projects like HULC and their ilk have been doing the media rounds for years now. They got a lot of media attention even though they failed at their basic goal - lowering metabolic cost. Since walking in a robot suit with any lag is so much more taxing than walking uninhibited, none of the systems to date have been usable for extended periods of time without operator fatigue*. I suspect that's why we've seen them at all: they were failures.

      Colour me paranoid, but I think the exoskeleton success stories won't be seen in Popular Mechanics until they're already obsolete.

      *Yes, I've worked on robotics exoskeletons, and have spoken with other people who develop them.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      To clarify, I'm talking about military power and endurance-boosting exoskeletons here, not rehabilitation systems. I have no experience with them, or their effectiveness.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    3. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by pegdhcp · · Score: 1

      IF this is not a joke, I want one. Aside from the possible "joke" factor, I wonder what is the capacity of power supply...

    4. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by RsG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, outside of the espionage business, I'm not sure I can think of classified military tech that remained secret until obsolescence. Not saying it hasn't happened (we might never know after all), or that they don't do their best to keep stuff secret, but once the grunts get ahold of something, you can bet it'll become common knowledge very quickly.

      The stuff that does get kept secret is the stuff that never enters widespread use, or only requires the knowledge of a few highly placed people to deploy. Spy planes and satellites, failed prototypes, software, bioweapons, strategic command and communication systems - those can be hidden. Anything destined for the front lines can't stay secret for long.

      Of course, you could have meant the successful prototypes will remain hidden from the public, but you did say "until they're already obsolete", which suggests they've passed the prototype stage, entered production, and fallen behind the curve.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    5. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      But aren't these things really less for endurance and more for "Oh hey, I can lift 300 pounds". Like, even if you get tired out, there's no way you could safely lift 300 pounds without assistance so doesn't it ultimately get the job done in that respect?

    6. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Hertzyscowicz · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what I'm wondering about. If the fatigue is caused by having to move slower for the sensors to catch up, and it's the exoskeleton carrying the weight, does that mean you would get about as tired walking a hundred meters holding your arms up as if you walked a hundred meters holding 300 pounds overhead?

    7. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The Borg aren't scary because they use technology to alter their biological being. They are scary because that technology is not under the control of the individual but used to strip them of individuality.

      That's the whole theme behind the Borg and I'm sorry if you didn't understand that. It's not that they are man-machines. It's that the machine controls the man. Not the other way 'round.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Heh, you're actually sorry for someone who didn't get the Borg? C'mon, there're more important things for either of you to be doing. Like discussing the merits of space travel as depicted in Star Wars ;)

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    9. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Considering they are renting them for $2300 a month and are being produced in numbers now, maybe these are not considered "failures" like the other ones were. And I would think that a person could adjust to moving with a 125 millisecond lag with some training. If they were actually more taxing than walking without the exoskeleton, I doubt that anybody would be forking over $2300 a month to rent them. And think of the applications for the paralyzed/handicapped - I doubt they would think these are more "taxing" than there normal inability to move at all.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    10. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Please see this comment, made immediately after my initial post, which clarifies that I was referring exclusively to military and power-boosting exoskeletons: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361809&cid=29362603

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    11. Re:HAL AND Cyberdyne!? by cmdotter · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't wait to see how these can be used in a factory where back breaking lifting/stacking/sorting is the norm. This should prove a boon to some segments of the blue collar arena where automation isn't a viable option due to expense.

  2. Seriously? by RobbieCrash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cyberdyne? HAL? Are we already this deep in the 'asking for it' business?

    --
    Keep on knockin'
    https://robbiecrash.me
    1. Re:Seriously? by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Only a matter of time before the "HAL 9000" model is released with the slogan "We are all, by any practical definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error."

    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new robot overlords!

    3. Re:Seriously? by Altus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Much better than the competitor, Holly, with the slogan "the closest thing to infullable you can get."

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous+Struct · · Score: 1

      Don't worry - they've also developed an awesome bipedal law enforcement robot that has wicked machine guns for arms. If anything goes wrong, we're totally covered.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Nick+Number · · Score: 1

      Well, at least until the surviving criminals start employing countermeasures.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    6. Re:Seriously? by jesset77 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least until the surviving criminals start employing countermeasures.

      Bipedal law enforcement robot does not need to climb stairs. Bipedal law enforcement robot simply levels the building.

      Mod me up now. You have ten seconds to comply.

      --
      People willing to trade their freedom of expression for temporary entertainment deserve neither and will lose both.
  3. The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Funny

    See title. I did not see anything in the video which could not be done by relying solely on your ordinary inner skeleton. Except of looking silly, which judging from western media's coverage of Japanese culture must be Japan's most popular pastime.

    But I will give some props to the exoskeletons -- they did not keep that girl from swaying her ass so nicely. Maybe they even enhanced it.

    1. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I did not see anything in the video which could not be done by relying solely on your ordinary inner skeleton.

      So says the person whose ordinary inner skeleton (and the muscles surrounding it) obviously work without any problem. The disabled, those in rehabilitation, the elderly and infirm, I guess these people don't exist in your world *roll*

    2. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it would be great if these things help the disabled, but none of the people in the test were disabled. And the article did not say that these would help the disabled. In fact it said that the exo-skeleton "is not ready for grandma yet."

    3. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of the people in the test were disabled

      How can you tell (*)? Maybe they're able to walk *because* of the exoskeletons.

      (*) Demonstrating an ability to read the text surrounding the videos is unacceptable, if it says they were able-bodied. Your reading of this clause constitutes your acceptance of it :D

    4. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by foobsr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The disabled, those in rehabilitation, the elderly and infirm, I guess these people don't exist in your world *roll*

      My suspicion is that with common use of these exosceletons the percentages of groups that 'need' them will increase. The trend, of course, could be reversed if people took more care of the standard implementation of body functions. However, that would not create another growing revenue stream in the health care sector.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    5. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for a (easily faked) slightly funny gait, I don't see anything in the video which proves the "robosuit" is anything more than a prop that is just strapped onto the actor's legs. They could have at least leapt over a tall building in a single bound or something.

    6. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      Check out a few of the videos of that exoskeleton on youtube. There is one of a guy holding something like 4 sacks of rice, walking around with them, and doing squats, and then another guy without the exoskeleton that is unable to hold up the sacks of rice let alone walk around with them.

    7. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like those mobility buggies old people use for shopping. Now common fatties use them too.

    8. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to put too much emphasis on this failing, but I can easily carry 2 50 pound bags of rice and do squats and I'm not even considered strong. My buddy could quite easily carry 4 and do squats and walk around. Having one person who can and one who can't doesn't really prove the suit is doing the "heavy lifting" portion of that task.

      I'm sure it's significantly augmenting the lifting, but it doesn't really prove anything about able-bodied versus disabled. Someone who can walk but can only walk short distances will probably benefit from this, but I doubt it's at a stage (yet) to help someone get up out of a wheelchair. The suit uses sensors that trigger based on electrical signals from the brain to the muscles. For most people who are truly handicapped, the signals don't get there, which is the source of their handicap. Until it reads the brain impulse at the source, instead of at the destination, it won't help truly handicapped people.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by greyc · · Score: 1

      My suspicion is that with common use of these exosceletons the percentages of groups that 'need' them will increase. The trend, of course, could be reversed if people took more care of the standard implementation of body functions. However, that would not create another growing revenue stream in the health care sector.

      <sarcasm>Yes, and by the same token we should disallow the use of airplanes cars and bicycles for people who are physically capable of travelling the distance under their own power, no matter the cost or effort.</sarcasm>

      What would be so bad about the scenario you describe?
      Taking good care of human muscles is a time-consuming, high-effort activity that many people don't find especially pleasurable, and that in fact isn't worth the results according to their own judgement. Historically people have increasingly offloaded activities previously done by human muscles to machines, freeing up time and energy to do other, more productive or pleasurable things.

      I'd want one of those suits. Well, not right now, because right now they're still very expensive and likely error prone, but I'd definitely want one for daily use once they're in mass production and the major problems have been worked out. And not just for the sheer nerdiness.
      Who are you to decide for people what they should and shouldn't offload to machines? If these things get good and cheap enough, they will be used by a large part of the population, who will be happier and more productive as a result. The people who use them will happily pay the price to make and maintain the machines, just as we currently pay the price to do the same with cars. And we'll all be better off as a result.

    10. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, strapping disabled folks into a prototype / beta exoskeleton would be a perfect test... but have you considered a bug/flaw in the system that causes a fall? Our (my) body can handle a fall just fine. But I am sure grandma couldn't handle it. TUCK AND ROLL GRANDMA!!!

      The article does mention wheelchairs controlled by thought. The _goal_ of these are to assist those that need it... not take your ass through Wal-Mart. :D

      It would be nice to see someone with a more obvious disability in this thing. I can't tell from the vid if it is actually working.

    11. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother would like to use this kind of technology, as it would enable her to perform the heavy labour involved in building and tending gardens for another 10 to 20 years.

    12. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      I believe foobsr is referring to the number of people that feel entitled to one because they don't bother investing minimum maintenance to keep themselves from becoming a fat ass. If your "disability" is something like that, you don't "need" one and are not entitled to government assistance to get one.

    13. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I will give some props to the exoskeletons -- they did not keep that girl from swaying her ass so nicely. Maybe they even enhanced it.

      Actually, I thought it caused her the most problems, because they didn't respond well to her natural sway. If you watch, each time her hips swing she looks like she's fighting for balance. This is especially noticeable when she steps off the curb. The men have trouble too, but not as much because they don't naturally sway as much. It made me wonder if these were tested too much on men and not enough on women. Hip sway is sexy, but it's not just for looks.

    14. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, the article DID say these would help the disabled - specifically, providing "much fuller mobility than a wheelchair."

      And you've twisted the quote, since what it actually said was the exoskeleton isn't QUITE ready for great grandma - implying that they're headed in that direction.

      But never mind about that, since the article also provides an even more interesting project: an (already-built) wheelchair that's controlled by a person's thoughts.

    15. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it would be great if these things help the disabled, but none of the people in the test were disabled. And the article did not say that these would help the disabled. In fact it said that the exo-skeleton "is not ready for grandma yet."

      No; but it is very likely ready for fat Americans.

      Huge market.

    16. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the most important part of that quote is 'yet'

    17. Re:The only thing they enhanced was the nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of logic is that? Everyone (including the disabled) should laugh derisively at the junk in the video, because it obviously doesn't do anything. Serious people should instead be interested in developing an exoskeleton that *works*, not cheap strap-on gimmicks.

  4. the future is now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    naming the company cyberdyne is just disturbing

  5. Worth it? by dgbrownnt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pay apartment rent, cable, internet, car insurance, student loans, and utilities... or live in a cardboard box and be a cyborg...?

    I'm in!

    1. Re:Worth it? by Jurily · · Score: 4, Funny

      "If men could fuck women in a cardboard box, they wouldn't buy a house." -- Dave Chappelle

    2. Re:Worth it? by ksatyr · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I thought it was just because I spent so much time reading /.

    3. Re:Worth it? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      or live in a cardboard box and be a cyborg...?

      It is Japan, the cardboard box houses are actually much more advanced than we're used to. That solar panel would be useful for charging your cyber parts.

    4. Re:Worth it? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've got one argument against it: People on the street going "Ha-haa! Cripple!" (And rightfully so, because if you not already are one, you will become one by using this all day long.)

      Besides: Humans are the most enduring runners on the whole freakin' planet! Why deliberately destroy that?
      I prefer to tune my free perfectly good biological machine, rather than buy an expensive experimental thing that hasn't stood the test of anything, let alone time. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Worth it? by macshit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've got one argument against it: People on the street going "Ha-haa! Cripple!"

      On the other hand, you can then rip their limbs off.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    6. Re:Worth it? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is worth it for almost-paralyzed people who are sick of being stuck into their wheelchairs. Most of the old people unable to walk are not paralyzed but to weak to stand. In US they pray, in Japan they pay. Guess who gets to walk again ?

      Seriously, I could see me pay a lot of money to be able to walk in the latter years of my life.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Worth it? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Rip 'em a new one (you'll have the strenght with the exoskeleton) and ask "well, who's laughing now?".

      And, honestly, how many people do you know that are actually enduring runners? Most people who suffer from civilisation are already out of breath when they have to get up from the couch to change channels because the remote is out of batteries.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Worth it? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "I suggest a new strategy - Let the guy with the exoskeleton win."
      -C3PO

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    9. Re:Worth it? by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I only glanced at the article.

      If the exoskeleton relies on detecting nerve signals to mirror body movement, then paralysed people whose motor-neurone transmission is disrupted might have a problem here. At this point, perhaps the signals need to be tracked back to the brainstem...

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
    10. Re:Worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides: Humans are the most enduring runners on the whole freakin' planet! Why deliberately destroy that?

      Disabled runners who are using simple flex-prosthetics are already being banned from Olympic competition because the mechanical advantage allows them to run faster and longer than ordinary limbs.
      This technology is still in its infancy, expect to see huge advances over the next 5 to 10 years. By the time your pure biological system is on the ropes, there will be much better, more elegant solutions in exo-prosthetics, and probably true cyber-prosthetics as well.

      While I'm in the same boat as you right now, I certainly do look forward to running around in a powersuit when I'm 90. Instead of brandishing a cane, I'll be brandishing a Laser Cannon from my chest. Why? To crush my enemies, of course!

    11. Re:Worth it? by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      I'm not even putting my exoskeleton on - I'm staying on the couch, hooking up my brain and getting it to walk around without me in it.

    12. Re:Worth it? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with handicap : we tend to consider it like a single problem when in fact it can have many different cause. Sure, it won't help 100% of handicapped people, it can however help people with very low muscular strength, which is common amongst elderly.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    13. Re:Worth it? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      end result is a workforce thats able to work for more years, as the most common issues that forces a retirement can be handled by these systems.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  6. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 3, Funny

    The military version might be able to lift 200lb weights, speed box, run, jump and other amazing things.

    Nothing a cup of water wont put a stop to.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, just like tanks stop dead when they get wet.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military versions seem to be somewhat restrictive, given that they require a power cable descending from an overhead gantry .. * rolls eyes 360 *

    3. Re:Hrmm by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      You got a good point there, man.

      What happens when one of the Special Ops boys falls out of the Zodiac?

      "Hey Sarge, why does everyone in the platoon call Pvt.Sanders "Boat Anchor"?"

    4. Re:Hrmm by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      Now we know why the Nazgul are afraid of water - they're cyborgs!

    5. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No they stop when they get hit by explosives (even the 'invulnerable' abrams) - the people inside are then cooked. Tanks are known as 'pressure cookers' for that reason. Think of at as 'the revenge of the lobsters'

    6. Re:Hrmm by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now make the cyborg 30 meters high and call the cable "umbilical cable" and we can talk...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Hrmm by izomiac · · Score: 1

      As opposed to when humans are hit by explosives... Probably one of the touted advantages of the "armored exoskeleton" is increased maneuverability (e.g. ability to avoid some RPGs) as compared to tanks, while retaining their bullet resistant nature.

    8. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the f-22, whose major enemies are things like rain, the international dateline, and being in the air for more than 1.7 hours.

    9. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing a cup of water wont put a stop to.

      Or would that be a tea cup? As in "death by a tea cup"?

    10. Re:Hrmm by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Underwater propulsion system and anti-laser-shark-lasers deployed.

    11. Re:Hrmm by loafula · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's only a matter of time before we hear news stories about malfunctioning brain-motor interfaces that make these robo-legs walk continuously with no control from the operator, and sending him or her ambling into a busy intersection for an abrupt introduction to the grill of a semi.

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    12. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot grenade and rocket/plasma jumping. The only real military applications of this exoskeleton.

    13. Re:Hrmm by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Nothing a cup of water wont put a stop to.
      I'm sure the military will have the sense to test that thier suits can work in the presense of water. It's not that big a deal to design stuff to work when wet though it does require some compromises.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  7. Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA, the exoskeleton from the Japanese is being made to help the disabled and the immobile. The US exoskeleton? It's for the soldier of tomorrow.

    Interesting priorities, that tell a lot about each culture.

    1. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by daveime · · Score: 1

      The uses are not mutually exclusive.

      US soldiers have a nasty habit of getting in the way of US bullets ... friendly fire, I believe they call it.

      If they are wearing exoskeletons, then maybe they won't end up disabled / immobile at the hands of their own generals ?

    2. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey that wasn't his fault, he was just spychecking and nobody told him FF was on.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by rhathar · · Score: 1

      ...disabled / immobile ...?

      Hey, I think Japan is developing an exo-suit for that!

      --
      http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    4. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only if the things come with armor that can stop the bullets properly. So far exoskeletons seem to be mostly meant to augment strength and mobility, not armor so a bullet would do the same damage. There are a few places that could be hit and cripple in a way that the exoskeleton could compensate for but there are many more places that will leave you dead.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by RsG · · Score: 1

      Even if they haven't been shipped with armour attached, this sort of technology is perfect for military armour, as the folks in the US are undoubtedly aware. The primary limiting factor in armour is weight. A soldier can only carry so much, can't afford to be slowed down, and already has many kilos of equipment, none of which are going away. To provide decent support against most military weapons requires fairly heavy armour - a kevlar vest isn't going to cut it here. Plus, you've got to balance weight with coverage; a full body suit is far more effective than a vest, yet weights at least twice as much.

      If a given soldier can march with another 80-odd kilos, most of it reinforced ballistic fabric overlaid by hardened strike plates, his survivability goes through the roof. Put a powered exoskeleton underneath, and put the armor overtop, and what you've got is the best compromise between standard infantry and a light armoured vehicle.

      The major limiting factor these days isn't the exoskeleton itself, which has been demonstrated to work. The biggest hurdle now is a power source, preferably an efficient or else easily refueled one. Can't have your grunts in the field constantly needing to find a wall socket or a gas station.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    6. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same could be said for Palestinians, although I believe there it's called "political executions". Friendly Fire might be a more accurate term.

    7. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Heck, as a bonus, I'm sure they can be programmed to walk the dead soldier inside it back to base. Well, until the enemy starts lobbing EMP Grenades...

    8. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      With powered armor like that you'll see heavier weapons too, more vests won't do much when everybody can fire sufficiently powerful AP rounds with then-standard infantry weapons. That would probably have an impact on light vehicle designs too if any powered infantry unit can just tear through light armor like paper... Of course we probably won't see 100% powered infantry deployment in any army soon.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, it's to counter the japanese elderly who were alive during WW2! They are a potential threat according to military logic!

    10. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The major limiting factor these days isn't the exoskeleton itself, which has been demonstrated to work.

      Isn't the major limiting factor money? Wasn't there an outcry that even US soldiers weren't issued bullet-proof vests due to financial restraints? How could they equip soldiers with these undoubtedly extremely expensive armored exoskeletons?

      Another restraint would be the lack of casualties. Nations running attack wars like the US NEED casualties to fuel patriotism. You cannot have your men too invincible. Military nations desperately need the occasional martyr hero to sustain public support. Not too many of course but a certain quota of casualties is essential.

    11. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      So the Americans are using exoskeletons to make more potential customers for Japanese exoskeletons?

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    12. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      Just because it was developed in Japan for the disabled and for soldiers in America doesn't mean that you won't see it on Japanese soldiers or American disabled someday.

      --
      This sig is false.
    13. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tells you more about how to get funding in each country, imho.

    14. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      Enhancing a soldier's physical strenght multiple times at the cost of speed and agility could eventually be the solution once all wars are fought with fistfights. Until that day arrives and the common soldier still uses machine guns, lightweight bulletproof armor is still the way to go.

    15. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the suit is being developed in Japan for immobile people, does that mean we can call it a "Mobile Suit"?

    16. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could have something to do with Japan being barred from most military development after World War II.

    17. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Good point, if I were to spend millions of Yen, I know in my heart that naming my company, and products after western psychotic killing machines would be one of the things I would need to do in order to be profitable. Personally, I thought the products sold themselves. What physically handicapped person wouldn't want to walk, run, or sit? What manual worker wouldn't want to have their load lightened? What Wii console gamer wouldn't want this as their joy-stick interface?

    18. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Good. However lightweight "bullet-proof" armor won't really stop the average machine gun bullet.

    19. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Never mind the lack of casualties - they might drop, but people will find a way around those exoskeletons. Another poster suggested EMP, and difficult terrain will surely decrease the range of soldiers equipped with such a beast.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    20. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA, the exoskeleton from the Japanese is being made to help the disabled and the immobile. The US exoskeleton? It's for the soldier of tomorrow.

      Interesting priorities, that tell a lot about each culture.

      Yes - the Japanese depend on us to defend them, just like the Europeans.

    21. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by interploy · · Score: 1

      Considering Japan is constitutionally barred from maintaining an army (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_9_of_the_Japanese_Constitution), what would they need military exoskeletons for? They do have the Japanese Defense Force (JDF), but it's officially an extension of the police, and is limited to that capacity. I doubt it'd be worth the cost to them, unless some JDF upper brass really liked Patlabor.

    22. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by dwywit · · Score: 1

      "Ripley to the cargo deck STAT"

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    23. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA, the exoskeleton from the Japanese is being made to help the disabled and the immobile. The US exoskeleton? It's for the soldier of tomorrow.

      Interesting priorities, that tell a lot about each culture.

      Oh, you mean like the military Treaty Japan has with us, after we kicked their asses and nuked them, which says they don't get to develop advanced military weapons?
      Might have something to do with it...

      Go watch some Anime. The primary use of exoskeletons (US term, the Japanese call them Power Suits) in most of their popular literature is for military or private mega-corporate security use. And that tells you a lot more about their culture... the actual development simply tells you where those with the money are spending it.
      And if you think the Japanese aren't actively developing military applications for this, you're fooling yourself. Even if they don't use them, they'll happily sell them to the US and its allies. The Japanese are simply much better about not leaking their military secrets to the general public, and their general public respects the government enough to not ask about it or poke around trying to "get the scoop".

    24. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      With powered armor like that you'll see heavier weapons too
      So powered infantry will be at a big advantage both offensively and defensively over conventional infantry and probablly light vehicles too...

      Of course we probably won't see 100% powered infantry deployment in any army soon.
      Probablly, I would guess they would be introduced as a special unit type for jobs like raiding buildings which are dangerous for conventional infantry but not really practical for vehicles.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    25. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The thing is exoskeletons will allow not just heavier armor but also heavier weapons.

      So unless we get some magic armor that can prevent all sizes and speeds of projectile from killing/incapacitating thier targets the infantry with the exoskeletons will have the advantage.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    26. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      You mark my words. The big strong soldiers inside will, in time, become all pale and weedy. And the batteries will go flat and then the little pale soldiers will crawl out and the enemy - who feared them - will start laughing and crush them with their boots.

    27. Re:Interesting Cultural Differences by Nexx · · Score: 1

      Well, while the JSDF does have its roots in the National Police Reserve, as of 2007, they're a totally separate ministry-level organization.

  8. Muscle atrophy? by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder what the long term consequences are of wearing one of these things all the time. As it is we're lazy. Now we don't even have to use our own muscles?

    1. Re:Muscle atrophy? by complete+loony · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Simpsons;

      Homer: "And here I am using my own lungs like a sucker."

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    2. Re:Muscle atrophy? by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      You use more muscles for these than you do for passively sitting in a car or buss.

    3. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world of Wall-E is closer than we think!!

    4. Re:Muscle atrophy? by boliboboli · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As someone who is ~30 and has 5 surgeries to date on my right knee, I'd prefer the consequences(muscle atrophy) of using using something like this to supplement my existing leg as opposed to a knee replacement. My point is, there are reasons other than laziness that some people may get excited about this technology(disabilities). Even wearing an acl brace, I can barely walk after a scrimmage with my nephew's or son's soccer team that I coach; an exoskeleton leg could keep me doing what I love for a long time w/o pain and disability.

    5. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That depends entirely on who will be using them. If those persons aren't able to move/exercise on their own then it's good, I'd take one of these over a wheelchair any day. If it's used for superhuman strength then I imagine it'll still take normal strength on the inside. But yeah, if you use it only for convienience and all the time then maybe. But that's really no different from a couch potato that barely gets his ass out to the car and back. In fact, I'm fairly sure that this motion will be more exercise than sitting in a car no matter what.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Muscle atrophy? by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not everyone is lazy. I have intervertebral disc problem, and sometimes, it could be pretty nasty, I can't even stand up straight. If I stand or walk over an hour or two, I would have difficulty standing straight, and the lower back all the way to my calf are painful.

      And no, I'm not a couch potato, I exercise twice to three times a week, mainly jogging (go slowly and gradually speeding up, up to 8km in 50 minutes) and swimming (2 to 3km in 1.5 hour) and stretching. And I'm not overweight either (had never been), I weigh 75kg, at 1.78cm tall. So that's pretty ok. If I don't exercise, my problems get worse.

      So this exoskeleton could be a nice thing for me. I just wish it's not that expensive, and not so "borgy" (not that I mind that much). I would love to have one to help me sometimes, which would make life less miserable when the problem arise.

    7. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, Porky.

    8. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1.78cm? Wow, I think you have more important problems than thinking about your spine!

    9. Re:Muscle atrophy? by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not overweight either (had never been), I weigh 75kg, at 1.78cm tall. So that's pretty ok.

      I hate to break it to you, but 75kg is extremely overweight for someone 1.78 cm tall.

    10. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Heh, I can imagine one of the lard-asses on the Wal-Mart electric carts using this kind of thing instead to move his 600-lb bulk.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    11. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best thing I've read all morning.

    12. Re:Muscle atrophy? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Exactly - fast forward a decade or so - these things are smaller, faster, lighter, cheaper (well, pick any two). You make them for knees, arms, shoulders. Maybe not the whole kit for most people. Big win.....

      Make something that can just take the strain off the lower back and keep people active and functional. Bigger win. 'Orthopedic failure' of one sort or another is depressingly common as we age. Sure, you can replace bits and pieces, but there are lots of downsides to that approach. Hell, just having a single leg unit to help people recover from knee replacements could be a pretty big market.

      Damnit, where are all of my patent application forms?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Muscle atrophy? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Mods, hello? Are we a tad bit challenged by the metric system today?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Muscle atrophy? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Mods, hello? Are we a tad bit challenged by the metric system today?

      Nah, it's just that all our mods work at Verizon's billing department, and factors of 100 give them a bit of trouble.

    15. Re:Muscle atrophy? by the_one(2) · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's a white dwarf you insensitive clod!

    16. Re:Muscle atrophy? by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 1

      I'm not overweight either (had never been), I weigh 75kg, at 1.78cm tall. So that's pretty ok.

      I hate to break it to you, but 75kg is extremely overweight for someone 1.78 cm tall.

      Perhaps he is Azazel... He's only 2 cm tall and very, very heavy

      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    17. Re:Muscle atrophy? by RiCo84 · · Score: 1

      With BMI 23.7 I'd say that person's weight is as normal as it gets.....

  9. Perfect! by HTRednek · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is Sigourney Weaver and we'll have all the protection we need when the aliens come back!

    1. Re:Perfect! by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      I know I'd, for one, feel perfectly secure nestled between them gorgeous breasts.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    2. Re:Perfect! by gijoel · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is Sigourney Weaver and we'll have all the protection we need when the aliens come back!

      Keep away from her you bitch!

  10. I doubt the title by dword · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The title of the original article says that these exoskeletons may soon become like bicycles. I doubt that and I'm sure that most governments will outlaw them. Whoever wears them could pose a serious threat to the people around him/her and why would anyone wear one for show if not for work (like construction) or fighting (which is illegal) ?

    1. Re:I doubt the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would anyone wear one for show if not for work (like construction) or fighting (which is illegal) ?

      FOR AWESOMENESS

    2. Re:I doubt the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigourney Weaver might also wear it to battle an alien queen.

    3. Re:I doubt the title by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      If we approve you for an exoskeleton, and the government turns you down, then we will pay for your exoskeleton.

    4. Re:I doubt the title by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      A car makes you a significantly greater threat to those around you, and those are legal with only the paltriest of operator certification processes(and that only for public roads). Also, since these things are going to start out being really expensive and only gradually get cheaper, they'll escape the stigma of being a dedicated menacing tool; because only wealthy dabblers or well-insured disabled, or people whose jobs require them will have them. Who is going to wear a $2300/month exosuit for malicious purposes when a handgun is easier, cheaper, and considerably less noticeable?

      I wouldn't be too surprised to see a grab-bag of "What about the children?" style operator age restrictions/licensing requirements implemented in various jurisdictions, and there will likely be safety regulation of the suits as well(which is sensible enough, any exosuit strong enough to be worth wearing is strong enough to damage the wearer if the control interface freaks out); but the notion of a general ban seems implausible.

    5. Re:I doubt the title by tgd · · Score: 1

      Its not exactly a secret that Japan is developing them because the majority of their population is getting to an age where they will not be able to take care of themselves.

      The needs of the elderly is driving robotic and exoskeleton development in Japan.

      So why would someone wear one?

      Because they can't walk without one.

    6. Re:I doubt the title by boxxertrumps · · Score: 1

      Of course! and while they're at it, why don't they outlaw running aswell. Only professional athletes and burglars need to run. There's no reason anyone would even WANT to run if they weren't receiving dollars on the penny. Kitchen knifes are a fairly dangerous item, most serial killers use them you know. Might want to get rid of books too, I hear that smart criminals get away with more crime.

      This kind of thinking reminds me of my mother.

    7. Re:I doubt the title by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I agree that they probablly won't be illegal to own or to use on your own private land. The real question is where will it be legal to use them. Will they be treated like electric wheelchairs and slow electric scooters used by old folks and allowed nearly everywhere? will thier use be restricted to locations with explicit permission from the landowner? etc

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:I doubt the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it wouldn't be hard for me to knock people down with my bicycle, either. And I think they made a video game series about what happens when you do that with a car.

      This has massive potential both for restoring movement to the disabled and for providing extra functionality to the healthy. Many workers, even today, do a lot of heavy lifting; these devices could massively increase their productivity. Additionally, the svelte form factor makes these much more attractive than Segways for commuters; someone in an exoskeleton doesn't take up much more space than an ordinary person, and yet they could ostensibly jog/run at an enhanced rate of speed without tiring. These suits' inherent all-terrain capabilities would make them a godsend for the infirm; no more frustration with stairs, knee-high fences, or rain-filled gutters. And, I'm sure the recreational possibilities are quite diverse.

      Segways were expensive, rather uncomfortable to use for long periods, and hard to get much use out of -- too slow for a bike lane, too fast for populated sidewalks. If these operate at moderate speeds and stop on a dime, they can simply slide into the niche in urban landscapes currently populated by skaters and joggers. Yes, some people are going to have accidents; it happens even now with joggers, who usually can stop within two strides. However, I don't see this as a special hazard worthy of being restricted, any more than I see a need for martial artists to register with a licensing bureau just because they COULD possibly beat someone to death.

    9. Re:I doubt the title by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Given their likely use in assisting the disabled, I'm guessing that any attempt at general restriction will be ADAed into oblivion in short order. Whether it will survive in limited form(like the "Service animals only" signs) or whether they'll just be generally accepted, I don't know.

      One tricky spot could be elevators. If the average pedestrian is a 450+ pound battlemech, they'll need to start actually enforcing weight limits on the older ones.

    10. Re:I doubt the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of the original article says that these exoskeletons may soon become like bicycles. I doubt that and I'm sure that most governments will outlaw them. Whoever wears them could pose a serious threat to the people around him/her and why would anyone wear one for show if not for work (like construction) or fighting (which is illegal) ?

      Hey, if you outlaw exoskeletons, only outlaws will have exoskeletons!

  11. Cyberdyne? by HFShadow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously? They named their company after the company in Terminator? I'm not sure if I'm amused or concerned.

    1. Re:Cyberdyne? by moisecaty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am also new here and i am still in the process of learning things in this site. I just accidentally saw the site and i registered http://ezinearticles.com/?Colon-Cleanse-3000-Review---Is-it-Worthy-to-Buy?&id=2790834 Colon Cleanse 3000

    2. Re:Cyberdyne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly person, they obviously named it after the company that made the cyber dolls in Hand Maid May.

    3. Re:Cyberdyne? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should have called it Omni Consumer Products instead.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. I hope their are occupant safty features. by kzieli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd hate to see what one of those things can do (to the user) if the sensors malfunction. Lets hope that the joints are desgined to not have a larger range of motion then the human wearing them.

    --
    read my mind at http://the-willows.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:I hope their are occupant safty features. by Sumbius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being mind-controlled and all, lets just hope that a beautiful lady doesn't walk past and you subconsiously grab a body part you don't want to be squeezed by a powerful mechanical arm...

    2. Re:I hope their are occupant safty features. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      squeezed by a powerful mechanical arm

      A whole new category of exoskeleton driven porn is being created as we speak.

    3. Re:I hope their are occupant safty features. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vaguely reminds me of a joke about a pirate (with a hook prosthetic arm) with jock itch... Don't remember if that was the punchline or the setup. Matybe someone can tell the joke.

  14. Natural Progression Leads Where? by tnok85 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way I see it, this has a very scary natural progression.

    Military use:
    At first, it's only used to assist in very special cases. Eventually it's perfected and every infantryman has one! Well, that's great. But one day, some 'genius' general is going to say, "Hey, what if we had the suits continue working even AFTER the soldier has died? That'll scare the bejesus out of the enemy!" And he'll get a medal, and some room full of programmers will work on making the suit controllable remotely, with simple commands that allow to act somewhat autonomously. (Stuff like... "Is the soldier dead? Okay, rush the bad guys and scare them")

    It works so well, that soon they don't even take the dead soldiers out of the suits until they start to smell pretty bad, which gives away their position. The suit would dig a grave, drop its soldier in it, and run back to base.

    Eventually that autonomy will prove so effective, they start allowing portions of it to activate even if the soldier is still alive. ("Not moving fast enough? Here, I'll help." "Hey, orders said go down this street, not that one. Let me help!" "Why aren't you shooting the small people with things shaped like grenades? Let me take care of that for you.") The soldiers will follow orders MUCH more effectively. And even if the suits walk them into death, well, the suits are more durable, and the enemy is more scared of dead walking soldiers, so... yeah.

    Corpse armies will soon become the norm, and instead of enlisted soldiers, we'll just start tossing criminals into the suits. Inevitably the criminals would disobey an order (probably given an impossible order right away) and lose 100% control, and just be slaves to the suit until they got shot in combat.

    So now we have robot zombie armies fighting each other with reckless disregard, since nobody's really getting killed anyway.

    Wow, I just had an awesome idea for a novel.

    1. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whats the idea for the novel?

    2. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now we have robot zombie armies fighting each other with reckless disregard

      I think you'll find that we already have that. Someone needs to find a way to reach the minds of the dim-witted-farm-boy-with-no-other-options, before the government does.

    3. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      mod up! bwhahaha! - oh wait, is that a zombie-thriller, not a family comedy? I'd buy your novel! Autonomous Zombie Apocalypse!

    4. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Nah, it would be much easier to just automate the suits and use the soldiers to pilot them from 10,000 miles away like we do with most of the UAV's. In this situation, you would only need one soldier per suit instead of another soldier to control a couple of them.

      You would also have the added benefit of the 200lbs of human flesh being replaced by weapons systems and ammunition to extend the range and battle readiness of the suits. Perhaps beefing up the armor quite a bit and placing a live human in a couple could give a better situational awareness of the battlefield but there isn't much lacking from some of the advanced systems in use today. A pair of microphones and a 360 degree camera can pinpoint the location of most gun positions once they fire. Attach a range finder or some radar with ranging capabilities, and the robot suit could accurately engage the enemy once discovered with pretty good accuracy. And the best part, the soldier can go home and kiss the kids good night before slapping the ol' lady on the ass when going to bed.

    5. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Obel · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, Clippy reincarnated!

      "It looks like you're committing religious genocide!

      Would you like help?

      # Get help with murdering the enemy
      # Murder the enemy without help
      # Sweet jesus get me out of this suit!
      "

    6. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea for the novel is to sell the idea to Michael Bay's (BOOM!) producers, then do the movie (BOOOOOM!), make lots of money (KABOOOM!), and then have some hack write an awful novelization (Fizzle).

    7. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Erh... why again do you need the flesh ballast inside the suit if it's working completely autonomously? Not using a human being would definitly be a plus. Less weight, less political problems (hey, none of our people die, good war!), no witnesses whose memory can't be completely erased...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by radtea · · Score: 1

      Nah, it would be much easier to just automate the suits and use the soldiers to pilot them from 10,000 miles away like we do with most of the UAV's

      Will someone please mod this guy up?

      Heinlein's powered armour idea was the product of a different way of looking at the role of humans in combat, when war (which Heinlein never faced except as a civilian engineer) still carried with it some idea of a moral test for the individual. That idea was waning even then, as mindless engineers had contributed so much mechanized killing power that notions of individual heroism and whatnot hardly mattered.

      Today, we very nearly have the opportunity to remove all but a very small number of humans from the front lines. Teleoperated humanoid waldos (a Heinlein idea that has stood up well) will be a big deal in the next century. Humanoid for two reasons: one is that they can go anywhere a human can go, and two is that they will be able to activate a million years of custom neural circuitry for the purposes of intimidating people. We just don't have any genes for being scared of wheeled boxes. Things that look like men, though... we've got lots of genes specially made for being scared of them.

      As always, the thoughtless engineers who work on this stuff will fail to consider the consequences of putting new technology in the hands of politicians and generals. For one, consider how mechanized soldier-surrogates might be used in ways to enhance deniabiliy. They can be made essentially untracable, so you could field a few platoons of them, smash and grab, and no one would have any way of ever telling who did it. The propaganda possibilities are enormous, and that's just the first thing off the top of my head.

      War in the recent past has been characterized by common soldiers not knowing why they are fighting. War in the future could plausibly involve common soldiers (and there will still be such, in the poorer nations like Iraq and Afghanistan) not knowing WHO they are fighting.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    9. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats the idea for the novel?

      And the movie and its sequels?

    10. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Things that look like men, though... we've got lots of genes specially made for being scared of them.

      If you follow that logic then make them look like man-sized spiders.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    11. Re:Natural Progression Leads Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if it's running a Windows OS and Microsoft Bob becomes the suit's personality:

      Bob: "Hi there! It looks like you're trying to kill a pack of terrorists! Would you like me to help?"

      *explosion*

      "Hi, it looks like your unconscious and bleeding from every orifice, would you like me to help?"

  15. Where's the friendly explosions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh. I'm still waiting for the "thirty second bombs".

  16. Not really by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It speaks heavily about their needs. Japan is very concerned about lack of youth. They are currently regressing in terms of population size (of Japanese; illegal aliens are an issue for them). OTH, America has spent TONS of money on it for moving things. Simply the last investment is via DOD contractors. But, there has been active research into this for several decades. And up until recent times, it was concerned mostly with hazardous waste and/or moving large material.

    Culture has NOTHING to do with this.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not really by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You, sir, win a million points for insight. Minus one for saying it has nothing to do with culture though.

      Publicly, it is very important to Japan that their innovations and applications are seen as being civil rather than military, for political and cultural reasons going back decades.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    2. Re:Not really by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Those decades would most likely be the from the end of WWII.

      Japan was forbidden to raise a military until some time around 2000 or so. They even caught a bunch of flack for their police being trained in paramilitary tactics in the late 80's and 90's. This set up is also one of the biggest reasons the US is heavily invested in Japan, while they were defenseless (could have limited defense forces but nothing like what would be needed to secure against China of any of it's neighbors), the US and some European countries stepped in with defense support augmentation. (an approach I think we probably should have taken with Iraq after the first gulf war while they were disarming).

      The reasons for that image has largely lapsed as the requirements have run their length of time but I think Japan's constitution that was created after WWII also limit's their offensive military capabilities too. I remember some issues cropping up during the first gulf war where their constitution prohibited even sharing in the monetary expense of it.

    3. Re:Not really by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is not entirely accurate either. An old roommate of mine, Yosuke explained that the gov. actually funds lots of projects that are dual use. His dad was high up in MITI, so he had some good knowledge. They simply fund it from the civilian side of things. But in general, they preferred items that were dual use. Partially for their own military needs, but also because they wanted to work closely with America (and sell it to us). The admin would have quietly looked at this for military purposes.

      As to the new admin, I have ZERO clue about them. It will be interesting to see If they jump into the coming Asian fortress lock, stock, and barrel. If they do, and slowly walk away from the west, they will likely have to increase their own military. America was a known and that we would not interfere in their in politics (after WWII, that is) or their culture. More importantly, we were their to protect their country. Not sure that we will do the same now.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Not really by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Publicly, it is very important to Japan that their innovations and applications are seen as being civil rather than military, for political and cultural reasons going back decades.

      No. It's a practical matter rather than a cultural one. The Japanese Military, such as it is, never goes to war, and soldiers are banned from firing their weapons, unless under life-threatening attack, and even then, they are expected to attempt to non-lethally disable the aggressor, if possible.

      In other words, Japan has no military.

      There is no possible benefit to spending lots of money on military weapons, since there are no lives nor outcomes on the line. The US military fights Japan's wars for them (or rather, threatens to do so, which has eliminated any and all aggression). Hence the US having a need for weaponry the Japanese do not.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      In other words, Japan has no military.

      That might come as a bit of a surprise to the Japanese soldiers in Iraq. Guess the silly buggers accidentally walked into Iraq, and somehow managed to miraculously manifest weapons and uniforms.

    6. Re:Not really by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The Japanese soldiers in Iraq don't do any fighting: "Their mission is purely humanitarian" -BBC

      In fact, Japanese soldiers are PROTECTED by soldiers from other countries when they need to go into a moderated dangerous area.

      In other words, the more you try to look smart, the more you prove you're an idiot.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      In other words, the more you try to look smart, the more you prove you're an idiot.

      Hrm ...

      evilviper (135110) on Wednesday September 09, @04:17PM - In other words, Japan has no military.

      evilviper (135110) on Wednesday September 09, @09:24PM - The Japanese soldiers in Iraq don't do any fighting

      Yeah, I see what you mean about that idiot thing ....

    8. Re:Not really by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Do you really think anyone believes any of the mindless crap you spout? Taking a look at a few of your other comments shows a sad, sad individual with nothing in his life, and nothing to contribute to society.

      Now let's try the full quote. Specifically, where I first mentioned, and explained in detail, exactly what the Japanese "military" is and isn't:

      "The Japanese Military, such as it is, never goes to war, and soldiers are banned from firing their weapons, unless under life-threatening attack, and even then, they are expected to attempt to non-lethally disable the aggressor, if possible. In other words, Japan has no military."

      I can see how someone like you, with an IQ they can count on their fingers and toes, might be unable to comprehend the English language, and believe it to mean something else entirely. I guess we should be happy you managed to be on your own, using the computed for several minutes without starting a single fire...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You know, you could have just said:

      "Sorry, I'm a moron, yes Japan does have a military and thank you for informing me of that fact."

      It would have made you look a lot better.

    10. Re:Not really by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The only thing worse than a mindless troll is a 42 year-old Canadian idiot troll.

      Not that I blame you, Steve. I guess if I was stuck in Halifax, I might hate my life, too.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Not really by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      You're quite correct, but as I said, it's important that the industry is seen as being civil. Just as you say, the administration would have looked at military applications, but quietly so. Honne and Tatemae are still deeply entrenched in Japanese culture, and nowhere more than in government and industry.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    12. Re:Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The only thing worse than a moron is a moron who thinks he's smart. I've never been to Halifax in my life, and the rest of your "info" is equally accurate. But I LOVE your casual bigotry. It's very progressive.

    13. Re:Not really by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you are an American who spends time in Japan. What is the new admin shaping up to be like? I have had my personal life in an uproar for the last 5 years, so have not been following international gov as much (though I do follow China somewhat closely). I keep wondering if they will join into the coming Asian fortress.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re:Not really by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      I'm a UK student of Japanese Studies at Cambridge, but I'll let it slide :-)

      The people I know in Japan are still waiting to see the effects of the new government. To be fair, most Japanese my age are very apathetic about politics, in spite of the regime shift, so I've not had much inside info!

      Personally, I think the REM export restrictions from China will have a greater impact on Japanese foreign policy and economy than anything else (especially given their latest commitment to radical reductions in greenhouse emissions, which will require plenty of advanced tech). Whether that will actually see them hopping into the Asia camp or not... who knows?

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    15. Re:Not really by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I'm a UK student of Japanese Studies at Cambridge, but I'll let it slide :-)
      Mea Culpa; No insult meant.

      To be fair, most Japanese my age are very apathetic about politics, in spite of the regime shift, so I've not had much inside info!
      Actually, they were apathetic back in the 80's, since things were good for them. My guess is that without the lost decade, the party would not have changed.

      I will be curious to see what happens. After Rudd was elected in Australia, I was curious to watch their response. They have actually been harsher towards China, not less. Hatoyama spoke in favor of more business with China during the election, but it could be no different than an American Republican speaking about a balanced budget. Nice words, but actions are the exact opposite.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  17. It is so wrong! by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I watched the video of the three people walking the streets with leg exoskeletons.

    Argh! It just abounds in wrongness! They are all in black, with white exoskeletons. There should be a red one, a blue one and a yellow one or some such! Don't these people watch Sentai shows?

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:It is so wrong! by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      No, but they're big fans of Star Wars.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    2. Re:It is so wrong! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Maybe they realized that even the most die hard geek isn't really a fan of the Power Rangers. At least once he crosses the threshold into an age where he might be earning the money to buy/rent one...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. I think somebody is forgetting something. by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the decrease in actual exercise performed while wearing one of these suits, soon everyone will be too fucking FAT to fit into them.

    And another thing...

    "Developing story! Epileptic in HAL suit has seizure on subway...18 reported dead. More at 11!"

  19. Gundams by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

    These things are in Japan for a reason, they made lesser gundams to keep eyes from looking for the big ones.

    --
    Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  20. The joke is in the acronyms by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cyberdyne = the fictional company that built Skynet in the Terminator movies
    HAL = the computer in "2001: A Space Odyssey"

    You're obviously not a science fiction geek ;-)

    And I'm surprised that a real company calls itself Cyberdyne and uses HAL as an acronym for a real product. While I appreciate the humor, most companies want reputable sounding rather than funny names. That way, Japanese Cyberdyne is a big exception.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  21. Doing what Japan does best! by davevr · · Score: 1

    Personally I can't wait for these to show up in Japanese Porn. There is probably already a wasei-eigo term for exo-skeleton-assisted rape.

    1. Re:Doing what Japan does best! by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would be astounded if it didn't exist already.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    2. Re:Doing what Japan does best! by ohsmeguk · · Score: 1

      rule 34 - If It Exists, There Is Porn of It. No Exceptions.
      rule 35 - if porn cannot be found of it, it must be created.

    3. Re:Doing what Japan does best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it exists. It just will be moved from animation to live action now.

  22. Who is best? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As always, the Japanese technology makes our attempts look crude and retarded.

    I wonder what will happen when the Germans start producing this kind of technology...

  23. Something I couldn't quite place... by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've posted a few times in this thread in an entirely joking manner, but something I couldn't quite put my finger on has been bothering me about this whole thing. It finally struck me.

    I occasionally do a little demonstration to show how the body responds to certain stimuli. You can try it yourself. Stand in a doorway, place the outside of your wrists against the sides of the doorjamb (the door has to be open, idiot), and apply steady, yet heavy pressure outwards with both arms, as if you are trying to do a jumping-jack, but the doorjamb is preventing your arms from going all the way up. Push hard. Hold it, still applying outward pressure, for a count of 60 seconds, then step out of the doorway and just relax, with your arms hanging at your sides. Weird, huh?

    Your arms will almost immediately begin raising back into the previous position, outwards, without any intentional effort, almost as if you are in a zero-G environment.

    Astronauts experience the exact opposite of this. They do not require much effort to move around, so that when they are suddenly back on Earth, it is very difficult for them to move around. I am not talking about muscle atrophy. That takes much longer to happen. As the previous exercise demonstrates, it takes a mere 60 seconds to condition the body to changes in the environment, yet it takes just as long for it to re-adapt.

    Now imagine a soldier in the field. Blastin' away, running hither and yon, jumpin' jack flash, for hours on end, his movements amplified by this crazy borg suit. Suddenly he takes a hit in the powerpack, or it just runs outta juice in the middle of a fire-fight. So what does he do? He takes the fucking thing off, otherwise he is a deadman (or simply laying there like one).

    Here is the problem. He is so conditioned to the suit, now it is off, it takes a long time to readjust. He is STILL a sitting duck, blundering around like a 40oz drunk because his muscles/brain are still expecting the suit to be doing most of the work.

    This is a bad scenario. He is the Terminator while the battery lasts, and Erkle-the-Wonder-Geek with no body armor when it goes dead.

    I think I'd rather hump the 80lb pack around and be able to dump it (and float like a butterfly) when the shit really hit the fan.

    1. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by mach1980 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about not making the feedback linear? I.e let the soldier hold 80% of the weight for small loads and 20% for heavier loads.
      Sure it would make it more difficult to differentiate the real mass of things you lift but its a small price compared to the problem you described.

      --
      Break the sound barrier - bring the noise.
    2. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      That might actually increase battery life too.

      Better yet, how about this.

      Give me a fucking robot that can carry all my shit and will follow me around? I can use it as a decoy, hide behind the fucker(and all it's armor), load my shot up buddy on it and even give it a pretty name, like Tinkerbell.

      Battery goes dead, I just take the important stuff and we are back on the road.

      And another thing...Is anyone else trying to imagine some grunt trying to SNEAK up on somebody in one of these suits?

      What about magnetic fields created by all the electronics and motors? How long before somebody figures out that the magnetic fields are perfect for triggering landmines or targeting RPGs specifically designed for such a purpose?

      Jeesus, give me a few more minutes and I'll probably come up with another few reasons why this is probably a very bad idea (unless, of course, you just got the DARPA research contract. It doesn't have to work in order to spend that research money).

    3. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think the current idea of military used it to get more supplies into combat faster. If the soldier can use one of these to carry an extra 100lbs of equipment, plus armor, then his entire range of readiness just increased enormously.

      The idea would be to send supplies into positions already under attack or to get the supplies close to the mission objective and then take what they need while stashing the exoskeleton for future retrieval. Going into combat is sometimes a compromise between necessary gear to accomplish the mission as well as necessary gear to survive the mission. The physical toll exerted on the soldier attempting to do both is enormous in a lot of cases, especially if they have to walk several miles into position. If you can reduce the physical wear and tear on a soldier to just the last 500 yards, they can carry enough provisions to get the job done as well as return home safely.

    4. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't argue with your main point, but the exercise you mention to demonstrate it doesn't seem to work for me. What I experienced, the first time I tried it, was that my arms tended to drift outwards as you suggested, but that went away after a vigorous shoulder-shrug. To make sure this wasn't just a time-based fade (after observing the effect and shrugging, it was probably over 30 seconds since I left the doorway), I waited 5 minutes and tried it again.

      The second time, as soon as I stepped out, I swung my arms up overhead and back down once. Then relaxed, and (surprise!) no difference in loose arm position vs the resting case. My diagnosis of this is that the shoulder joint is displaced somewhat by the unusual reverse-cantilever loading, and pops back to center under normal usage. Since this is a geometric effect, it can't really be extrapolated to any other joints, and gives no insight into genuine muscle adaptation effects, which I'm sure do exist, and are a potential problem.

    5. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      The reason the military is putting so much research into powered exoskeletons and other methods for infantry to carry heavy loads is that they want to turn the TOW antitank missile and M2 machine gun into infantry weapons. Magnetic field strength varies with the inverse cube of distance; if a single infantryman can kill a soldier at a mile (M2) or a tank at three miles (TOW), it doesn't matter what sort of magnetic noise he's giving off.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    6. Re:Something I couldn't quite place... by mach1980 · · Score: 1

      You just made me think of Aliens and that lovley MG-42 strapped to steadycam harness *sight*.

      Think having a GE 7.62 mm minigun connected to this exoskeleton with proper regulating loops handling the spinup yaw and recoil. Strap the new ipod nano to it for the terminator-view http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUtC0OWhfEU&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5355921%2Fvideo-shot-with-ipod-nano-our-first-clips%2Fgallery%2F&feature=player_embedded and play Rammstein. *fap* *fap* *fap*

      --
      Break the sound barrier - bring the noise.
  24. Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it a few development/update cycles, and these skeletons will be able to fuse together to form giant beast-shaped shaped composite robots!

    Now all we need is for some mad scientists to genetically engineer a giant monster, and drop it in Tokyo... and invent cardboard skyscrapers for them to bump into.

    1. Re:Oh yeah! by piemcfly · · Score: 1

      Ack.That was me. Hate it when I forget to log in =___=

  25. New spam subjects ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long before I get spam talking about these things being able to improve my performance in bed ... ? :-)

    1. Re:New spam subjects ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      You have a exosexeton, your wife has one. And you let them run at each other while you watch TV shows in peace...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  26. geeks have no imagination.... by fantomas · · Score: 1

    ... they get all excited by films and books and rely on artists to come up with cool cultural memes to follow and become fans of? (like the rest of society)

    1. Re:geeks have no imagination.... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Artists are in the business of cultural memes, that's why people rely on then to come up with them--it's their job. Also, it is possible to be a geek and an artist.

  27. I thought 'Holy Crap!' by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    When I read "...paralyzed from the neck down ... was able to get within 500 yards of the summit... with the help of a HAL exoskeleton worn by his friend " - No wait, Unwow that one

  28. I thought that was happening with autos anyway? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Aren't they making autos bigger because people can't fit in smaller ones? Can you imagine an American family all fitting into a Model T Ford these days?

    1. Re:I thought that was happening with autos anyway? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Oh man, don't get me started.

      I damn near fell through the floorboards of a 92' Ford Escort that a customer of mine brought in for an alignment back when I was a mechanic. The guy weighed well over 400lbs. He literally cracked the floorpan and it decided to give on my test drive. Driver seat punched right through to the asphalt, sparks ahoy.

      The really funny part was he wanted me to make the damn thing drive straight. The entire suspension on the left side of the vehicle was TOAST. Thing was NEVER going straight again. At least the seat falling through the floorboards saved me the embarrassment of telling him his abused car was never going straight again because he was TOO FAT.

      Why a 400lb man would buy a Ford Escort, I'll never know.

    2. Re:I thought that was happening with autos anyway? by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Troll

      Damn straight! Fatties need to get SUVs where another 400 lbs aren't really noticable to the car.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I thought that was happening with autos anyway? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Heh! I can't even picture someone that size in an Escort. I can't really fit into those at half his size. Though my problem is more leg room than weight.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:I thought that was happening with autos anyway? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i think i ones observed 4 guys that size or bigger pile into a morris mini...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  29. Fuck soldiers, give it to the elders and disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why on the earth we put military use before everything else? For fuck's sake, this stuff can be useful to some people for good.
    If soldiers don't want to get hurt they can choose to avoid going to war, while old or disabled people have no control on their age or illness.

  30. Arses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arses for rent in San Francisco.

  31. Starship Troopers by elFisico · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd recommend reading "Starship Troopers" by Robert Heinlein, which covers some interesting problems regarding exoskeletons used in combat. The solution of course is to not amplify the soldiers strength unless needed. The suit should simply move with the body in normal situations and only ampify in extreme situations, when the soldier exerts extreme force.

  32. Feel free to "re-wow" it... at least a bit by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Sure... OK.
    It didn't make the quadriplegic walk autonomously again - but it did allow his friend to hike up the mountain for three hours with him on his back.
    Have you recently tried piggybacking a grown human for three hours? Up a mountain. In the snow.

    Nearly doubling one's lifting strength, is kind of a wow-deal.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Feel free to "re-wow" it... at least a bit by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      It is pretty amazing! I just meant the way it was written gives the wrong initial impression ;)

  33. Japan is very big into helping the elderly by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    their robots are aimed at aiding the elderly and this exoskeleton would do the same.

    If Japan didn't have someone looking over their shoulder perhaps their development of these products would be different? It has got to be kind of convenient to have the US providing support militarily, not that there are no drawbacks because there are some.

    then again, after all their monster/giant robot flicks perhaps there is some cultural inhibition to making them come to life.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  34. Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are these things powered? With the amount of work they will need to do batteries just won't last long.

  35. Seen the video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh, they must be from the ministry of silly walks.

  36. Skynet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO "SARCOS" exoskeleton is the best. Btw "skynet story" :)

  37. Sweetness! by Joe+Diamond · · Score: 1

    That is seriously the coolest thing that I've ever heard of. I mean, mind controlled body suits? That's awesome!

    1. Re:Sweetness! by Joe+Diamond · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they can perform similar functions to the suit that Iron Man wore, or which one was the inspiration for the other? Are their color choices?

  38. Fallout 3 and the Chinese by gowdy11 · · Score: 1

    Hello, I would like a suit like that. It kinda reminds me of the power armor in fallout.

    1. Re:Fallout 3 and the Chinese by billybob248 · · Score: 1

      chyeah!

  39. Cyberdyne? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that a real name for a real apocalypse in the movie Terminator...?
    Quick, destroy them, lest we start seeing more walking metal exoskeletons, with the evil red eyes!

  40. billybob248 by billybob248 · · Score: 1

    yea I've heard of this a while back, cool concept, but yea i think it should be aimed more towards the disabled now a days with everyone...well you know...getting old, rather than using it as a tool for the military, don't they have enough already?

  41. Japan set back 300 years by tru3ntropy · · Score: 1

    It seems like a rather low tech solution for mere transportation in Japan did they have another earth quake? http://www.theonion.com/content/news/earthquake_sets_japan_back_to_2147

    --
    In Google we trust.
  42. Re:Fuck soldiers, give it to the elders and disabl by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    That's more about letting a soldier carry around and fire a M2 Browning machine gun.

    And besides, you're a fucktard. No one's putting military use before anything else, except maybe for the fact that there's more bucks available for military research.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  43. Figures by gx5000 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading that these things would be offered at the same price this article says they are being rented at. I should have known that thinking Grandpa could afford one of these for less than $3k (once they went in high production) was foolish. Still, here's hoping that they replace all those "Rascals" bumping into the public. Those things just turn you into lumps of meat on wheels, whereas these suits could not only help you get around, but help with therapy.

    --
    End of Line.
  44. exoskeleton suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ore wa GUNDAM!

  45. How do you collect rent? by rawr_one · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how do you collect rent from somebody using a cyber-exoskeleton strength-enhancing crazy suit? I, for one, would just beat the snot out of the people trying to reclaim it!

  46. New way to get into trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict someone will be found beaten to death with a sofa.

  47. Sigourney Weaver is a frequent customer by peter303 · · Score: 1

    "Take that you bitch"- Alien Queen versus exoskeleton fight at end of Aliens.

  48. not made for women? by buback · · Score: 1

    The girl in the video looks like she is walking awkwardly. At one point she stumbles when stepping off the curb. Her hips move much more then those of the men beside her, and it seems like this might not be a unisex type of device.

    I know that makers of high end hiking backpacks have male and female versions because of the different physiology between the sexes. It would seem that exoskeletons would also will have to be customized for a specific body shape and sex.

    1. Re:not made for women? by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you saying there needs to be a high heel version?

  49. We're afraid by mmaniaci · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why all the negativity, slashdot? Most posts here are some Terminator reference or a "detailed" explanation of why the skeletons / suits won't work (yet they do). I have a feeling all of the fearmonger posts are from Americans, because we seem to be perpetually afraid of advances in technology--especially by those evil Japanese or Chinese! I dream of the day when the whole world rejoices at significant technological advances, not just the country that profits the most... I dream of a day when we humans realize we're not going to survive until we cooperate with eachother. My dreams aren't profitable.

    1. Re:We're afraid by sexconker · · Score: 0

      My negativity comes from the fact that these things will only realistically result in the further atrophy of physical fitness.

    2. Re:We're afraid by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      I'm negative because I'm not done building mine yet

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  50. How can this help disabled? by teamsleep · · Score: 1

    I have Muscular Dystrophy and I can barely use anything but my hands and that's limited in of itself. This only works for those who have good use of limps, I guess? Depends how much pressure it takes to push down/use strength. I wish it could help me. I just don't see me being able to use it.

    Oh well. COME ON GENE THERAPY!!!! :)

  51. Lazy by hunmaster · · Score: 1

    In other words we are getting so lazy that now walking is just too damn hard to do. Hooray for technology!!

    --
    Rapper's have their bling-bling made out of platinum. My necklace is made of rhodium.
  52. Healthcare pays well in JP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan's lost in a war, and "has no military force" as its government says(JSDF *officially* isn't a military force), so such devices "that can be used for invasion " are unlikely paid. On the other hand, considering there's a health insurance system, which limits pays from patient to 10-30%, or sometimes even less, mandated for every Japanese citizen, plus growing amount of elderly, healthcare business really pay well. No real reason to try selling those kind of devices to JSDF.

    # Just take a look at this.