Slashdot Mirror


Carl Sagan Sings

gijoel writes "Someone with too much time on their hands and access to Auto-Tune has taken clips from Carl Sagan's Cosmos series to make this fantastic song. Watch for the Stephen Hawking cameo."

37 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Question about the first clip by Winckle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What episode of Cosmos is the section where Sagan begins "I'm not very good at singing" ?

    1. Re:Question about the first clip by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Informative

      Episode 11: The Persistence of Memory

      Around the 10:24 mark.

  2. Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should this not be posted under idle?

    1. Re:Question: by Abreu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No way! This was too beautiful for idle!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Question: by religious+freak · · Score: 2

      On the contrary, imho, this is what idle SHOULD be, instead of the worthless crap we saw at the first launch of idle (though I've got to admit, idle stories have gotten noticeably less shitty over the past few months).

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    3. Re:Question: by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the processing made Hawking's voice sound raspy and unrealistic.

  3. Autotune the News by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Autotune the News has been doing this kind of thing for a while now.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bduQaCRkgg4&feature=related

    1. Re:Autotune the News by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His tune-up of MLK's I have a dream speech is pretty awesome. It's good enough to actually consider a mainstream artist doing a proper cover in the mode of the Obama "Yes we can" video.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Autotune the News by ksandom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless you think the effect is cool - in which case you're a retard.

      This is where art and profession differentiate. And why they need each other.

      Opinion != fact

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    3. Re:Autotune the News by plastbox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Opinion != fact

      Sadly, a vast majority of people, when faced with this argument, will reply (as Sheldon Cooper's mother did when discussing creationism) "..and that is your opinion!". Sad state of affairs indeed!

    4. Re:Autotune the News by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That you've noticed. If your pitch correction is noticeable, you're doing it wrong. Unless you think the effect is cool - in which case you're a retard.

      I could say the same about synthesizers: "If your synthesizer is noticeably different from a real instrument, you're doing it wrong. Unless you think synthesizer effects are cool - in which case you're a retard." Artists have always looked for new ways to create sounds. The repurposing of autotune is no different from the creation of synthesizers, or any other new instrument. Why is someone "retarded" for thinking that the use of autotune as a new musical tool is cool?

      I mean, it annoys me too, but your point of view is really condescending. Let musicians play. Autotune is just a set of algorithms; there's no reason why it can't be used in a way that the original programmers didn't anticipate. And anyway, Stevie Wonder and Peter Frampton both used vocoders for a similar effect. Are they "retarded"?

    5. Re:Autotune the News by Ardeaem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, the classic "I'll change what I said; maybe people won't notice that I said something different TWO POSTS ABOVE" technique. No, you didn't say that the (non)musicians were retarded. You said that anyone who thinks the effect is cool is retarded. This covers ANYONE who likes the effect, not just stupid RIAA brands. I am a musician. I am just as offended by modern pop music, if not more, than you are. But don't be silly and make blanket statements about ANYONE who likes the effect. I'll ask again: Do you think Stevie Wonder and Peter Frampton are retards? Or musicians?

  4. I don't care. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was worth watching.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. Re:Censored from youtube due to copyright violatio by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is perhaps unquestionably true that there is nothing more pathetic than the inheritors of the estate of great personages who choose to enrich their own endowments than carry on the work from which it came.
     

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. Re:fuck autotune by d474 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    fuck autotune...that shit was old from day one.

    Yeah, but Carl Sagan is dead, so there aren't many other ways to make it seem like he's singing. If anything, this is the most appropriate use of autotune technology I've seen to date: Making the dead come back to life in a new way.

    I'm sure Carl would approve :)

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  7. A Still More Glorious Dawn (of some sort) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think about the time in which Sagan lived, and the hope and threat of a more glorious dawn awaiting. Someone once compared the light of a nuclear detonation to the light of a thousand suns. While the current nuclear stockpile wouldn't reach the light of 400 billion suns, I think it would be close enough for all intended purposes. The current poll on /. seems to be leaning heavily towards the expectation that we will have destroyed ourselves in 100 years; Hawking has repeatedly stated that if we are to survive long term as a species, we will have to inhabit other worlds or at least colonize space. It seems that, barring any of a thousand other extinction events, the current age of humanity, whatever span of time it may be, will in fact rest upon which more glorious dawn we, as a species, choose, or allow to be chosen for us.

    1. Re:A Still More Glorious Dawn (of some sort) by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Funny

      So let's say that we do colonize space and/or other worlds. Why do these guys think that the "colonists" won't end up just like us in due time?

      Nobody thinks that. You think there are people thinking this, but I think you're wrong.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    2. Re:A Still More Glorious Dawn (of some sort) by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Those guys are smart. Those guys never said the universe needs or wants us to survive. That's the ramblings of some moron posting things on the internet, rather than a top physicist.

      Why do *we* want to survive? Probably because most of us (other then the aforementioned moron) still have the desire to survive, procreate, and pass on our genes to a future generation. That's been hard-wired in most life on the planet for quite some time now.

    3. Re:A Still More Glorious Dawn (of some sort) by rantingkitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why exactly, does the universe need or want us to survive? If the universe doesn't need us, why do *we* need us?

      What the hell are you even talking about? This is about as coherent as an episode of Teletubbies.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    4. Re:A Still More Glorious Dawn (of some sort) by ciderVisor · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is about as coherent as an episode of Teletubbies.

      Oh yeah ?

      "Laa-Laa sent out for one of those short, plump little breads called Tubby Toast, which look as though they had been moulded in the fluted scallop of The Noo-Noo's hose. And soon, mechanically, weary after a dull day with the prospect of a depressing morrow, I raised to my lips a spoonful of the Tubby Custard in which I had soaked a morsel of the toast. No sooner had the warm liquid, and the crumbs with it, touched my palate than a shudder ran through my whole body, and I stopped, intent upon the extraordinary changes that were taking place...at once the vicissitudes of life had become indifferent to me, its disasters innocuous, its brevity illusory..."

      --
      Squirrel!
  8. How is this less important? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He inspired a generation to be interested in science. How many actual scientists today can trace their choice of career back to Cosmos?

    Oh, and read Demon-Haunted World.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:How is this less important? by Scott+Ransom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm certainly one of them (thanked him for Cosmos in my PhD thesis specifically).

      And I agree with you about Demon-Haunted World. I think that should be required reading for all high school students.

    2. Re:How is this less important? by kidcharles · · Score: 4, Informative

      My thesis has a quote from his wife: "He didn't want to believe, he wanted to know."

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    3. Re:How is this less important? by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He inspired a generation to be interested in science. How many actual scientists today can trace their choice of career back to Cosmos?

      Oh, and read Demon-Haunted World.

      Read all his stuff. Pale Blue Dot is great for instance. His short essays were brilliant. Pity he was an arrogant man and so harsh on Sci-Fi though (especially Startrek) but that too is a lesson - don't idolize people.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:How is this less important? by arethuza · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's interesting - reading Demon-Haunted World also made me consider what the "must read" books for people leaving school should be. I'd certainly have that and include "Why People Believe Weird Things" http://www.amazon.com/People-Believe-Weird-Things-Pseudoscience/dp/0716733870 and a "A Short History of Nearly Everything" http://www.amazon.com/Short-History-Nearly-Everything/dp/076790818X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1254133445&sr=1-2.

  9. Amazing... by Loomismeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I could listen to those two all day. That song just overflows with profoundness.

  10. New Slashdot meme? by areusche · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Jostles for microphone) I'm sorry Carl, but Beyoncé had the best music video of all time!

  11. Re:Censored from youtube due to copyright violatio by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    perhaps unquestionably?

  12. Loud by WeblionX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's nice, but the music track is too loud compared to the voice.

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  13. Expurgated version by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is there a version edited for rednecks?

    --
    Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  14. Where is the Original Cosmos series??? by rmdyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone have any idea of how to get a hold of the very original Cosmos television series that aired on P.B.S. back in the early 80's ?

    The Cosmos series was bought, remastered, and remade in the late 90's by Ted Turner, and that is the series that I own (the DVD set), however it is not what I watched as a child. I liked the original better. The original had much better ambient music, and in the transitions between scenes, worked much better I thought (more powerfully evoking). The remastered version may be more up to date scientifically, but the music has been replaced with mostly classical that doesn't fit the emotion, and is hacked up quite a bit.

    I know the story is that Carl had a large disagreement with the way the original series was produced by KCET out of Los Angeles. Later the series was remade with the help of his wife, but some of the original music could not be relicensed (or was not even licensed correctly the first time) when the series was sold to Turner.

    I have most of the episodes of the original 80's version on cassette, that I have now digitized. But the sound isn't that great since it was recorded by simply placing a microphone in front of the TV. There are other tape "abnormalities" as well, like the side A to side B change over.

    I know there must be some remaining VHS or Beta tapes around of the original series somewhere, since they were sold as sets to schools and universities back in the 80's. I'd love to have a copy of those! Digital of course.

  15. Re:Censored from youtube due to copyright violatio by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cosmos is continually being removed from Youtube and re-added.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  16. Autotune the News #8 was the best mix by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yo, I'm happy for Autotune #1 and all, but I'ma let you finish... the Autotune the News #8 was the best news mix of all time.

    Especially the lip-sync video editing was just too good. It had me singing along to Michael Vick ... that's gotta count for something :)

  17. Re:Censored from youtube due to copyright violatio by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good point.

    You can download both the mp3 and the high rez video from this page

    http://www.colorpulsemusic.com/youtube.html

  18. Re:fuck autotune by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you think he'd be for or against sounding like Kermit the Frog gone techno?

  19. Carl Sagan is amazingly inspiring by Dasher42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was given the book Comet which he co-authored with Ann Druyan, and while you might think the subject matter smaller, the vision it showed for how we could travel to space and spread life between the stars was amazing. It showed there's more to do out there than invent a spaceship to go from world to world at - how we do not know - speeds far greater than light's. We can be the ancestors of life made to be out there. Panspermia might not be a fact now, but we can make it so. I think that's a beautiful goal to pursue.

  20. Very nice by Lavene · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lot's of negative comments here. I can only assume that they're posted by the younger generation.
    To me though, that had the privilege to watch the original "Cosmos" series in my early teens, this video brings back found memories of a man that inspired me and planted the seed of curiosity in me.

    I like this video. Not for the music or technical achievement, but for it's spirit.