Slashdot Mirror


First Look At Wild New "Level 10" Concept PC Case

notthatwillsmith writes "Maximum PC just posted an exclusive hands on with Thermaltake's unique Level 10 case. This concept design features individual compartments for different components (each with dedicated cooling) all mounted on a black steel frame. The case looks like a prop from 2001, rendered in black steel instead of white plastic. It's absolutely unlike anything I've ever seen before."

287 comments

  1. very pretty by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but for me, and my company, ludicrous to even consider. Laptops and Desktops and Servers are all throw-away* commodities these days. I have no use for this. But wow, it's pretty.

    *recycle, Manbearpig thanks you.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:very pretty by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cases like this are aimed at the hobbyist, not at corporate desks or people only interested in a tool.

      Personally, I kinda like it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:very pretty by sadness203 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      47 pounds case ? It's for no hobbyist, it's for body builder. No normal geek could even think of moving this behemoth.
      And I find it rather ugly.

    3. Re:very pretty by sajuuk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any normal geek should be able to lift 47lbs without a problem from moving around outdated CRTs to throw them out of windows. And from moving around liquid cooled servers.

    4. Re:very pretty by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      47 pounds?! Hope you live next door to the factory because it'll cost more to ship than to build.

    5. Re:very pretty by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      The article summary seems to agree with you:

      "The case looks like a prop from 2001, rendered in black steel instead of white plastic".

      *points to Cupertino* - the cute little toys are that-away, bub. I rather like the "ugly black behemoth".

    6. Re:very pretty by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Funny

      They've helpfully taken care of that problem, ensuring that the cost of the case is significantly more than the cost of shipping by setting the case's price at $700.

    7. Re:very pretty by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      When you're already paying $700 for the case, what's another $100 for shipping? That's like searching for a $10 discount on RAM when you're also buying a $1000 Core i7 Extreme (and then possibly using it for nothing more than Minesweeper). It's all about perspective...

    8. Re:very pretty by tttonyyy · · Score: 1

      A true geek appreciates the insides of a PC. A case is purely superfluous.

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    9. Re:very pretty by Nested · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any normal geek that is, excluding Mac users. Jobs killed CRTs back in 2002 (well, except for the eMac which sold for an additional three years to EDU) lending plenty of time for major muscle atrophy to have set in.

      tl;dr Mac users won't be able to lift this thing.

    10. Re:very pretty by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      I used to have a 50 pound tower, and I even carried it from one end of campus and back (one mile).

      Today's geeks get to enjoy the luxury of being out of shape with their EEE PCs and Macbook Airs.

    11. Re:very pretty by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's not a troll, that's an opinion from a non-cutting edge user or non-gamer.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:very pretty by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! The same thing occurred to me a long time when I had to clear out a large storage room full of dead CRTS and every-single-part-made-completely-out-of-lead computers. Don't forget ye olden days printers as well...Always wondered how my wimpier brethren got by.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    13. Re:very pretty by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I just threw out a beige-box server case that weighed almost as much as this one & it was no where near as pretty.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    14. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't be able to use it anyway, since they aren't allowed to build their own machines (Jobs killed that too).

    15. Re:very pretty by theIsovist · · Score: 1

      that's not a non-cutting edge user, that's just someone who looks at a case and says, yeah it may look good, but i'll go with the 5 dollar option that does the same and enjoy my end of the year bonus, thank you very much.

    16. Re:very pretty by BassMan449 · · Score: 1

      My tower weighs over 50 now. Any powerful computer in a large case will likely way as much as mine. I didn't RTFA but if I'm interpreting it right and the case itself is 47 pounds with no components then your probably looking in the mid 50's once everything is in there. That really is not that extreme and I've seen some computers that are far worse.

    17. Re:very pretty by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      My Mac Pro weighs 42 lbs. That's not much less than this case.

    18. Re:very pretty by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just saying "any normal geek" already excludes Mac users. It has nothing to do with when Apple stopped using CRTs.

      /me dons asbestos undies

    19. Re:very pretty by Shagg · · Score: 1

      If you can't move 47lbs, you're in serious trouble. My 6 year old could probably move 47lbs.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    20. Re:very pretty by Duradin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're forgetting about the massive amount of smug they haul around all the time.

    21. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will way as much? What does that even mean?

    22. Re:very pretty by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No normal geek could even think of moving this behemoth.

      First, who moves their desktop computer? The reason we have laptops is so that we can move them around. Desktops are meant to sit next to, or under, or behind the desk, in a closet, on a shelf (a strong shelf in this case).

      I have no problem with a 50-lb desktop case if it's quiet and keeps the computer's bits cool.

      I hate having my computer crash because of heat when I'm right in the middle of a stunt run in Burnout Paradise.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re:very pretty by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    24. Re:very pretty by tacarat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've been meaning to talk to you about that. Your 6 year old has been seen beating up /.ers for their lunch money.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    25. Re:very pretty by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cases like this are aimed at the hobbyist, not at corporate desks or people only interested in a tool.

      Lemme edit your sentence for you a little. "Cases like this are aimed at tools." That's much better.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    26. Re:very pretty by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      I think he meant "weigh." I just got finished building a new computer inside of a Lian Li PC-P50 black anodized aluminum case. 14.5 lbs. $180. Nice looking but not artsy. Certainly won't end up in the MOMA. Well ventilated, easy to add parts, mostly thumb screws. And lots of room for oversize video cards and the like. Why anyone would pay $700 for steel is beyond me. Guess it will make a good boat anchor when it reaches the end of its useful life.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    27. Re:very pretty by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "First Look At Wild New "Level 10" Concept PC Case"

      I've been staring at this thing for 6 months now. Why is it hardware never gets the attention of /. until Maximum PC or other snot-nosed website submits it? What happened to /. getting tomorrow's news first instead of yesterday's news last?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    28. Re:very pretty by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Alaska, you insensitive clod! EVERYTHING costs more to ship than to build!

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    29. Re:very pretty by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was interested until I saw that. $700 is a deal breaker. It's cool, but it isn't that cool.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    30. Re:very pretty by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Smug is weightless when contained within the RDF.

    31. Re:very pretty by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't move my desktop often, but it does happen. I once had to take my desktop to a database programming class because stupid Windows required a reboot after installing an ADO component, my VB/Oracle project required the ADO component to work, and the college PCs had something like Deep Freeze installed so that all changes were rolled back at reboot. Solution? Bring my desktop to class to demonstrate the project. It was a PITA, but I got an "A"

      I wish I had known Perl and Linux back then...or had a laptop. Or both :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    32. Re:very pretty by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Think I'll wait for the $150 generic version.

      $700 is ridiculous. You can buy very nice cases for under $200 leaving $500 for mb, cpu, graphics, hard drive, ram... hell the entire computer is less than this one case.

      I went to the website for the case looking for answers and found no real explanation of why it's $700, just that it's stylish and innovative. Guess it's the equivalent to having a expensive work of art on your wall by a artist no one has heard of but you still spent 20 grand on it.

      They discontinued my favorite case. Wish they'd bring it back, mounting a 300mm side fan in that vent would cool the entire PC.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    33. Re:very pretty by sadness203 · · Score: 1

      I guess the obviousness of the previous message was lost somewhere in the sweat :)

    34. Re:very pretty by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I rather like the "ugly black behemoth".

      We're not interested in your sexual preferences, Eth.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re:very pretty by mederjo · · Score: 1

      I have a new Mac Pro as well and it's certainly hefty, but it's still not as heavy as my older dual 2.7 GHz G5 PowerMac with liquid cooling.

      On the Steve Jobs/CRT thing, I was using 21" CRTs until 2006 or so. It's never been obligatory to buy Apple displays, in fact my second monitor is a Dell LCD, previously connected using an adapter via VGA to the second connector on the graphics card, now using DVI. I have to say I was glad when my last big CRT died, because I was sick of hauling that thing up and down stairs whenever we moved.

    36. Re:very pretty by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just saying "any normal geek" already excludes Mac users. It has nothing to do with when Apple stopped using CRTs.

      Only for extreme definitions of "geek" (which is excluded by the term "normal geek").

      Macs are very geek-friendly. Unix + a commercially-supported desktop system? Even Linus Torvals uses/used a Mac. He ran Linux on it (obviously), but still...

      Now, had the term been "gamers" or "oss geeks" or something, you'd have a point.

      /me dons asbestos undies

      Or, paraphrased: I'm going to pre-label anyone who disagrees with me as a troll or fanatical fanboy.

    37. Re:very pretty by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Funny

      $150?

      Fuck that. I just screwed all my components into a scrap piece of plywood.

      Five years, no failures.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    38. Re:very pretty by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in Alaska, you insensitive clod! EVERYTHING costs more to ship than to build!

      Sure, but most of that is all the overhead the post office has to deal with to make sure Putin isn't hiding in any of the packages.

    39. Re:very pretty by node+3 · · Score: 1

      The article summary seems to agree with you:

      "The case looks like a prop from 2001, rendered in black steel instead of white plastic".

      *points to Cupertino* - the cute little toys are that-away, bub. I rather like the "ugly black behemoth".

      He's talking about the movie, not the year. In 2001, Macs weren't white, they were colorful.

      And present-day, they are almost all aluminum (there is *one* model that is encased in white plastic).

      On the other hand, calling Macs "toys" is from the year 2001. So you got something right...

    40. Re:very pretty by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I did something similar. I bought some aluminum rack cover plates and a sheet of steel so I could try to make a rack-mount case. It's not sturdy enough for the face plates to actually hold the PC in a rack (so it has to sit on a shelf) and I never built the top of the case (so all the innards are exposed), but it's been running like a champ for about seven years now.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    41. Re:very pretty by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Frequently, the weirdos that buy these kinds of cases are the ones who put ten fans in their case and have even more fans as part of the various components in the machine. Five case fans end up in the locations built into the case and then they add five more fan mounting locations and fans using a hole saw or worse a metal nibbling tool. Then they say how the components in their case are obviously as low as possible and include numbers for the temperature, but not for the amount of noise produced by the computer. However, someone with a clue builds their own similar system, uses a single case fan, and ends up with lower component temperatures and noise levels well below the 90dB the first guy's monster produces.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    42. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know paraphrase should be shorter? Just sayin'

      My paraphrase would be... cheesy joke.

    43. Re:very pretty by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Y'know paraphrase should be shorter? Just sayin'

      Paraphrase means to rephrase, generally for greater clarity, *not* necessarily for brevity.

      My paraphrase would be... cheesy joke.

      Paraphrased: I'm not wrong, I'm funny! :D

    44. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this statement is highly incongruous with the amount of money spent on hobbyist cases per year.

    45. Re:very pretty by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, who moves their desktop computer?

      geeks?

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    46. Re:very pretty by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      Why am I not surprised that the website for the case makes you wait while a flash animation loads? It's even complete with a techno soundtrack and pictures of the case taken at dramatic angles. Once I saw the hi-res wallpaper, featuring pics of the case, I knew the whole thing had to be some elaborate parody of technophilia. That is what is is, right???? To think there's some lonely nerd out there, ogling photos of this case while rubbing his crotch frantically...

    47. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As a hobbiest, I like having my components inside a rather simple monolithic block, rather than in separate sub-enclosures that achieve the same purpose. It's not because of style or anything, but if you've seen how dusty it gets in here on occasion... The less horizontal surface area, and less overall external surfaces, the easier it is to keep the damn thing clean. (And any dust that makes its way inside, about 90% stays near the vents or on the fan. So quarterly cleaning maintenance is effective enough.) Also it's quite a bit lighter, on the rare occasion I may need to move it.

      So plain ol' generic black case wins for me, but only for reasons of pragmatism and lazyness.

    48. Re:very pretty by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Because it's not news until Slashdot gets paid for it. Didn't you see who submitted it?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    49. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it was probably designed on a mac...

    50. Re:very pretty by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's about the same as the PS/2 model 80 towers. They had a handle built into the top of the case.

    51. Re:very pretty by quanticle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, who moves their desktop computer?

      Geeks going to LAN parties, of course. What's the point of buying a case like this, if you can't take it around and show to all your (now green with envy) friends?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    52. Re:very pretty by ajegwu · · Score: 1

      (Score:5, Ironic)

    53. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had plywood? I just put the pieces on the ground and set 20 pound stones on top to keep them from floating off.

    54. Re:very pretty by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Funny

      If smug had mass Debian users (myself included) would have collapsed the world into a black hole by now.
      That said, I've got to get back to using my carefully and conscientiously designed OS.
      Was I being to condescending there? By the way, to be "condescending" means "to talk down to."

      --
      Not a sentence!
    55. Re:very pretty by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      1. Weighs 47 lbs. 2. Costs $700 Yeah it's pretty but for $700 I can build a decent (not great) gamer and have enough left over for a Bawls.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    56. Re:very pretty by Caue · · Score: 1

      LAN parties? really? are those still around?

    57. Re:very pretty by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they take place over the internet... Hamachi/skype can make a pretty good LAN party equivalent for older games that don't have internet play anymore (command and conquer and such).

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    58. Re:very pretty by Caue · · Score: 1

      yeah, but then nobody will see your $700 brand new case. and you won't carry it around just for show.

    59. Re:very pretty by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      I only stopped using a CRT a couple of years ago. While I'm definitely happy to be rid of the bulk and glare, it was only recently that affordable mainstream LCD monitors caught up to my old 22" CRT in terms of resolution.

    60. Re:very pretty by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      Very cool design but $700 is a deal breaker. The first case that I ever bought was on the cheap end and worked alright, then I upgraded to a Lian Li. Much more expensive than a generic but worth the difference in quality. This case, however, is too far past the optimum point on a price/quality curve to be anything other than a show-piece.

    61. Re:very pretty by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      LAN parties? really? are those still around?

      Yes. Some of us have friends who live in areas where dial-up or satellite are the only non-LAN options. Dial-up may have been ok for Quake, Warcraft 2 and Descent but it's pretty damn impossible to play most recent games on dialup. I have to give credit to Guild Wars though, it plays pretty respectably on dial-up. Anyway, back to making my point... Sometimes a LAN is the only reasonably fast option. Besides, there's nothing more satisfying than watching your friend snap his keyboard over his knee when you telefrag him. >=)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    62. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a hobbiest?

    63. Re:very pretty by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

      /me dons asbestos undies

      Or, paraphrased: I'm going to pre-label anyone who disagrees with me as a troll or fanatical fanboy.

      I took it to mean he was expecting to get flamed in response... one need not be a troll or fanboy to flame someone. I'd expect a 6-digit UIDer to know the difference.

      I was going to mod it "Funny" before I noticed I didn't have any mod points.

      -- longtime/fanatical Mac user (who utilizes OS X's "geek stuff" daily)

    64. Re:very pretty by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Indeed they are! I'm going to one this weekend, actually.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    65. Re:very pretty by Caue · · Score: 1

      can I come?

    66. Re:very pretty by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting about the massive amount of smug they haul around all the time.

      Amen. The fact that Mac Stores don't collapse into a black hole is something science cannot explain.

    67. Re:very pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the case but I must contradict your theory that mac users cannot lift 47 pounds. I can bench press 300 pounds and still know C++GUI

    68. Re:very pretty by iamangry · · Score: 1

      That's ok, "Mac user" and "custom case" together in the same sentence doesn't make any sense anyway, for obvious reasons. This isn't targeting the "I want a user friendly happy box shipped to me ready to go" - demographic.

    69. Re:very pretty by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I took it to mean he was expecting to get flamed in response... one need not be a troll or fanboy to flame someone. I'd expect a 6-digit UIDer to know the difference.

      Just put, ", etc." at the end of my statement then.

      The point wasn't to be an exhaustive list, but to point out that "/me dons asbestos undies" is a rhetorical device meant to preemptively disparage disagreement as a flame. It puts any response on the defensive.

    70. Re:very pretty by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Apple's 21" Studio Displays were $%*#&ing heavy.... about 85lbs if I remember correctly, and no easy way to pick it up, given that all of the edges were stylishly rounded off (remember, this was the same era that produced the godawful hockey-puck mouse)

      The eMac also suffered from being astonishingly heavy (although a more reasonable 50lbs, which was still damn heavy for a machine of its size), and was even more "slippery," quickly becoming the bane of educational IT professionals (myself included) who had to move them from place to place on a yearly basis. This was in sharp contrast to the iMacs, which were light, and had a handle built into the top. (This also allowed us to hurl them into the dumpster with great ease/fun, when the district finally allowed us to retire them after ~9 years of service)

      I still have my G4 tower from 1999 connected to the 21" Studio display. Damn good machines, and still reasonably fast with current software -- it's painfully ironic that the 10-year-old G4 can hold as much RAM as my 2-year-old Mac Mini. Although the Mini (obviously) wins hands-down for ease of transportation, the G4 was pretty light, and had some nice handles. The acrylic case was solid as a rock -- probably moreso than most metal PC cases.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  2. Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you buy one of these suckers, you'd best make sure your girlfriend really enjoys dusting. Oh, wait a minute...this is Slashdot. Never mind.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you buy one of these suckers, you'd best make sure your girlfriend really enjoys dusting. Oh, wait a minute...this is Slashdot.

      I'd also point out that, in addition to slashdot, this is also the 21st century.

    2. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That means vacuuming instead of dusting?

    3. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by eln · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd also point out that, in addition to slashdot, this is also the 21st century.

      Exactly! We can make our own mechanical women now, girlfriends are soooo last century!

    4. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by schon · · Score: 1

      No No No.. it means that dust has been vanquished and doesn't exist anymore!

    5. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      My *wife* (yes really) does actually like putting on a maid's costume and picking up the feather duster.

      Unfortunately, she never gets around to the dusting.

      So I'm thinking of exchanging her for a newer model.

      Your "mechanical women" seem like just the trick... can you please send me the technical specs and blueprints?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by megamerican · · Score: 1

      If you buy one of these suckers, you'd best make sure your girlfriend really enjoys dusting. Oh, wait a minute...this is Slashdot.

      I'd also point out that, in addition to slashdot, this is also the 21st century.

      I'd also point out, in addition to this being the 21st century, water is wet.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    7. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'd also point out that, in addition to slashdot, this is also the 21st century.

      Exactly. Neither of us bother to dust.

    8. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am SO tempted to respond to this in a sassy way ... but, alas, my Karma is currently positive. Gotta keep Carson Daly happy.

      --
      L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    9. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by NoYob · · Score: 1

      If you buy one of these suckers, you'd best make sure your girlfriend really enjoys dusting. Oh, wait a minute...this is Slashdot. I'd also point out that, in addition to slashdot, this is also the 21st century.

      You tell 'em. I have an out of work programmer who's job was off-shored dusting my shit.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    10. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      My *wife* (yes really) does actually like putting on a maid's costume and picking up the feather duster.

      Unfortunately, she never gets around to the dusting.

      I'm a tad confused - is this a bug, or a feature?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a tad confused - is this a bug, or a feature?

      Depends on if you're home when it happens.

    12. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      It used to be a feature, but middle age has made it into a bug.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Can I have the *wife* since you don't need it anymore? I don't mind bugs like that, and the maid costume might be interesting,

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy one of these suckers, you'd best make sure your girlfriend really enjoys dusting. Oh, wait a minute...this is Slashdot. Never mind.

      Dusting? Ewwwww...

    15. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by sherpajohn · · Score: 1

      LOL - nicely done!

      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    16. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Tanman · · Score: 1

      Damn Honda and their fem-bot android girlfriend substitutes!

    17. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Audrima · · Score: 1

      hey! I would not let anyone touch my rig. and this gal like the case.

      --
      Sorry, I'm not a person. I'm a smart human. :P
    18. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Abreu · · Score: 1

      No No No.. it means that dust has been vanquished

      By Lord Asriel?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    19. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is to have your wife put on the costume and you use the duster. That takes the sting out of middle age.

    20. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..[snipped]...

      So I'm thinking of exchanging her for a newer model.

      I'll take the old one off your hands at no cost; I'll even throw in my new model wife for no extra charge.
      Please forward your adress.. ;-)

      AC.

      PS: Please enclose maid outfit too and I'll throw in my asbestos suit for when you forget to put the toilet lid down, hell have my earplugs and Prozac stock too...

    21. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      +2 for His Dark Materials reference. -3 for not saying The Magisterium instead.

      --
      Squirrel!
    22. Re:Looks like a bit of a dust magnet by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really matter, as long as someone else isn't at your home when it happens!

      Extra caution is advised if your wife suddenly has unexplained cash and/or herpes.

  3. Wait... what? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The case looks like a prop from 2001, rendered in black steel instead of white plastic. It's absolutely unlike anything I've ever seen before.

    How can it look like a prop from a movie if its unlike anything you've ever seen before?

    Logic failing aside,

    It makes me think of what might happen if they combined the Death Star's Exterior with a PS3.

    1. Re:Wait... what? by xxEtineSxx · · Score: 1

      The case looks like a prop from 2001, rendered in black steel instead of white plastic. It's absolutely unlike anything I've ever seen before(IRL)

      Thar -- fixd.

      --
      "It's all been said before."
    2. Re:Wait... what? by theIsovist · · Score: 1

      or simply, the PS2 slim with a few cheesy 3rd party additions. Am I the only one who thinks this looks almost sue-worthy similar to the PS2?

    3. Re:Wait... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It kinda reminds me of a cross between a Cylon and the MCP from Tron.

    4. Re:Wait... what? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    5. Re:Wait... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine trying a trench run on this thing...

      Where's the vents on it?

      Speaking of nonsensical features, I wonder why they don't just make starships black. Huge white starships are kind of easy to see, target, warn against, etc.

    6. Re:Wait... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it comes with an exhaust shaft that goes directly into the core reactor? I wonder if Semantic sells anti-photon torpedo software?

    7. Re:Wait... what? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Seeing a target isn't so much of an issue if you have sensors that detect outside of the visible spectrum. However, the bigger concern is heat dissipation, which can be a large problem in space, and making a black exterior only exacerbates the problem if you are close to a big light emission source such as a star.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    8. Re:Wait... what? by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Huge white starships are kind of easy to see, target, warn against, etc.

      That's no starship....that's a moon.

      --
      Squirrel!
  4. Motherboard? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's just incredibly gorgeous.

    Did anyone notice whether or not it can handle standard motherboards?

    1. Re:Motherboard? by lien_meat · · Score: 1

      I read on their website on the "Gallery" tab that it's atx & mini atx form factor. (somehow the specifications are in the gallery...no clue why...)

    2. Re:Motherboard? by bcmm · · Score: 2, Informative
      From TFA:

      The case fits standard ATX and micro-ATX boards.

      It is indeed beautiful. And it's very cool that it takes standard hardware Every other commercial case I've seen is either a barebone with a non-removable motherboard, a conventional large box, or a large box with tacky plastic 'round the edges to make it look less like a large box. I couldn't imagine anybody spending this much on a non-standard case which will go obsolete, but a real case stays current for a long time, unless, of course, the PSU is non-replaceable. Anybody know about that?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:Motherboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As opposed to what? A non-standard motherboard?

      "Yes, here's our 700$ case. It's huge and you will pay through the nose to ship it, but surprise! All you're allowed to put in it is this incredibly specific profile that Dell designed for one discontinued line of laptops back in 2002!"

      It takes ATX and MicroATX. So yes. "Standard."

    4. Re:Motherboard? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Gorgeous?

      It barks.

      Really. Who wants their home or office to look like a hold over from a 1920's industrial plant!?!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:Motherboard? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Every other commercial case I've seen is either a barebone with a non-removable motherboard

      A "non-removable motherboard"? What do you mean, like a motherboard that's attached to the case with screws? I've never seen a single case that has a motherboard attached in a way that you couldn't remove it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:Motherboard? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe he means a non-replaceable motherboard, as in one with a proprietary form factor or that uses nonstandard connectors.

    7. Re:Motherboard? by amazeofdeath · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that GGP meant non-removable motherboard *tray*, as the Level 10 case has a removable one.

      --
      U+F8FF
    8. Re:Motherboard? by Painted · · Score: 1

      looks around
      raises hand

      In a hot second. Gosh, it's almost like personal taste is personal!

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  5. Can't wait to dust it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All those nooks and crannies, I'd say it looks like the moore's law version of an english muffin. Hope your apartment is actually a fab's clean room.

    1. Re:Can't wait to dust it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I thought when I saw it, too.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. Duh by moogied · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course its like nothing you've ever seen. Its completely unnecessary. I've never seen a car with built-in centrifuge.. doesn't mean they should make one.

    --
    So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    1. Re:Duh by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The centrifuge is for enriching the uranium in your carbon-free nuclear gas turbine green-car, you unimaginative clod.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Duh by tttonyyy · · Score: 1

      Of course its like nothing you've ever seen. Its completely unnecessary. I've never seen a car with built-in centrifuge.. doesn't mean they should make one.

      I travel by centrifuge you insensitive clod.

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    3. Re:Duh by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      1.21 gigawatts should be enough for anyone.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could, since the car has a perpetual motion engine powered by an endless supply of centrifugal force.

    5. Re:Duh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      For suitably small values of "centrifuge", you could probably just cable-tie you sample tubes to one or more of your hubcaps.

      Heck, a lot of hubcaps even have convenient little slots in them, that would be just about right for sample tubes...

    6. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've never seen a car with built-in centrifuge.. doesn't mean they should make one.

      They do.

    7. Re:Duh by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Heck, a lot of hubcaps even have convenient little slots in them

      Hubcaps... Wow, you are old... But then so am I. :(

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    8. Re:Duh by Jeng · · Score: 1

      But wait, I haven't invented the piston driven fusion engine yet. The centrifuge was going to be for pulling out useful isotopes that could be exchanged for more fuel.

      Solution for the first wall, move the wall.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    9. Re:Duh by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Of course its like nothing you've ever seen. Its completely unnecessary. I've never seen a car with built-in centrifuge.. doesn't mean they should make one.

      Dude, that's a brilliant idea! You've solved the age old problem of peanut butter separation in automobiles. You'll get the Nobel for this. Well-done, sir.

    10. Re:Duh by kuzb · · Score: 1

      1.21 gigawatts should be enough for anyone.

      Make it 1.21 JIGGAwatts, and you've got a deal!

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    11. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jigga wat?!

    12. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo dawg!!! I heard you like centrifuges... ah hell.

  7. Ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cool? Yes. $700 cool? No.

    1. Re:Ok. by joggle · · Score: 1

      Sigh, I have to agree. According to their website their target customer is architects (trying to make a good impression on clients presumably), high-end gamers (presumably the highest end gamers who have absolutely unlimited budgets) and content creators thanks to its thermal properties.

      I don't see how this case could possibly be worth $700 to anyone that cares anything about money though (except for perhaps the architects). Sure, it looks pretty but it's also huge, heavy, difficult to clean and awfully expensive for a case.

    2. Re:Ok. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Cool? No. $700 cool? No way in hell.

      If it was a choice between this and the Antec Solo with both at $89.95, then maybe I'd be interested in this case but it would be close.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Ok. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      (presumably the highest end gamers who have absolutely unlimited budgets)

      This. $2000 can get you an essentially top of the line machine these days (at least, it did for me); if I were going to spend $700 on the case, I'd want to scale up the other parts appropriately (getting into you-have-to-be-kidding-me territory), and the machine would cost somewhere in the vicinity of $7000. Granted, it's not hard to put together a parts list far exceeding that cost, but no gamer really needs anything that expensive.

    4. Re:Ok. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Now I'm wondering if my neighbor, the metalworker, could do something like this for a fraction of the price if I gave him the specs?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Ok. by theIsovist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it interesting that they intend to sell it to architects. The case design is clutered and littered with ornamental additions. the reveals on the flat side take away from the clean plane they attempted to create. Modern architecture and design is about simple, elegant beauty. This case is overly elaborate and the added details do nothing to enhance the function. For the record, IAA.

    6. Re:Ok. by vlm · · Score: 1

      Sure, it looks pretty but it's also huge, heavy,

      Oh now no need to make fun of Maximum PC's website ... Oh, wait, were you talking about the PC case?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Ok. by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Cool? Yes. $200 cool? Still yes.

      $700 cool? Are you fucking kidding me?

    8. Re:Ok. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      $2000 can get you an essentially top of the line machine these days (at least, it did for me); if I were going to spend $700 on the case, I'd want to scale up the other parts appropriately (getting into you-have-to-be-kidding-me territory)

      I specced a machine at $1500 that has 16G ram and a $200 geforce card - at the $2000 price point, I suppose I'd have a faster proc and the $500 card, but if I went to $7k, it'd probably be a DB server + 3 webservers in a remote rack. seriously, how do you spend $7k on a box without it being for some sort of medium to large website? I think I could get the hardware to run half of fark for $7k.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  8. Pretty but still not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you look at the drive bay covers they are not perfectly aligned. For $700, you would expect Jobsian OCD attention to detail, regardless in shortcomings to the other design elements.

    1. Re:Pretty but still not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      attention to detail

      Obviously you aren't very familiar with ThermalTake.

  9. The bottom line: $700 by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's all I really need to know. It looks interesting, it might be cool, but I'll never buy one.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:The bottom line: $700 by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      Makes me want to quantify the Mac tax I pay... as in I tend to equate to the days when Alienware and likes first hit the scene and a lot of us scoffed at paying for packaging... and here I am with an iMac and a MacBook Pro.

      The problem I have with this case is that its shown in vertical. Granted the old style desktop is not in vogue anymore but towers just scream computer. I guess its why my preferred platform is a laptop operating closed (clam shell) most of the time. Its because I can place it somewhere where it does make a statement. Which is also probably why I like the iMac, it doesn't look like a computer. Don't get the wrong idea, Apple doesn't always get it right. The Mac Mini and Apple TV both have no place in my world, the later would look like crap in my entertainment center and many others as black or stainless are what is in style.

      The second problem with a case like that is that all the imagination is gone when its created, you don't get to much of anything other than assemble it. At least with traditional cases you can paint/window/etc them to make them look less like hardware.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    2. Re:The bottom line: $700 by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Especially since one can build a new machine for less than that total.

      I'd love to meet the person who builds a machine that has thermal demands that necessitate a kit like this, then actually pushes the machine enough that he couldn't have gotten by spending 1/3rd of the price.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    3. Re:The bottom line: $700 by msimm · · Score: 1

      I'd call it a novelty. Instead of having a big box with excess room for customization/accessories we have a hodge-podge of compartments clustered together to form our chassis, each with individual air-flow concerns and complications. I don't hate the idea of modularization but I'd rather see slots with data/power ports (think hot-swap bays on server hardware) built into standard cases then something as needlessly complicated as this.

      If the end-result offers no clear advantage (not counting additional complexity) I'd simply call it novelty and keep walking.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    4. Re:The bottom line: $700 by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      If someone's putting together a machine with the kind of thermal demands you're thinking of, they're not spending $700 on their computer, they're probably spending that much just on their video cards. And if they're spending that much on video cards (note the plural) then they're probably doing something with the machine that you can't do with a $700 computer. Like playing DirectX (insert latest version here) games. Or maybe running CAD software. Or animation rendering.

      This isn't for people who want to do some word processing, some surfing the net, and maybe play a rousing game of solitaire. This is for people who want to play Crysis (or the nearest non-buggy equivalent). Most people can get by with a low-end, commodity computer (if they don't mind replacing it every few years as the cheap parts fail), but some people really do need more power, and will pay accordingly to get it.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:The bottom line: $700 by eebra82 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you don't make enough money, or lack the interest. Or both.

      This case is for that kind of people and it's painfully obvious even without having people pointing out the price tag.

    6. Re:The bottom line: $700 by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      I understand the purpose of the case, and the reasons it would be necessitated for certain builds. However, I don't believe that most people who build that kind of machine really need everything they put into it. And if they do, are you certain that this $700 case would perform significantly better than a $200-400 case to justify the additional cost? Couldn't 90% of the heat issue be solved with proper air ducting? I don't see the need to thermally isolate individual HDDs, when one or two fans on all of them is just as effective and much less costly.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  10. "Thermally isolated" by qoncept · · Score: 1

    The guts of the Level 10: individual compartments keep components thermally isolated. And it looks wicked.

    Sweet! Now my hard drives and CPU get hotter and my DVD drive stays at room temp! HOW ADVANCED!!!

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:"Thermally isolated" by whimmel · · Score: 1

      External drives are hot right now. Lets make *everything* external, but we'll glue it onto this backboard.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  11. Expensive! by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    The Level 10 will be available in mid-October for $700.

    $700 for a case? I can buy a quad-core desktop with more RAM than I know what to do with for that much.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Expensive! by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      Run Flash in Firefox!

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    2. Re:Expensive! by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      That is what I was thinking.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    3. Re:Expensive! by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      Not too expensive if it becomes the next Mac. In fact, they could strip off all the extra component bits, put a swing away LCD monitor on the flat side, and make it the new iMac.

    4. Re:Expensive! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can't impress your style-over-substance Mac-loving friends with a quad-core desktop and 8GB of RAM in a boring case.

  12. Looks stupid, priced stupid by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Troll
    Fugly. I wouldn't pay $700 for that. Let me change that - I wouldn't pay $7.00 for that. It's too damn big. Also, if you add up all the fans you'll need to take full advantage of the |individual cooling", it's going to be noisy.

    Definitely targeted at the "more money than brains" folks.

    1. Re:Looks stupid, priced stupid by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Definitely targeted at the "more money than brains" folks.

      Of course, it came from BMW Design Group...

      Actually, I'd like to think of it as "Just as much money as brains"...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  13. Anyone else remember the Cube? by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Ah the simplicity of simple easy to access slots for things.

    Hey this looks cool, but that is about my budget for a whole rig, so I will stick to something functional without stupid LED glowing in my eyes.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Anyone else remember the Cube? by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I wanted simple access to things, I'd by a server rack case with hot swap bays and a convenient door on the top of the case then mount it under my desk like a drawer. Come to think of it. That's what I want... Where are the computer desks with built in rails?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Anyone else remember the Cube? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to make (or modify) one with some basic power tools and some plywood.

      Actually, while it sounds cool, I don't think it'd work that well in practice. My experience with rackmount computers has been that while the 19" width and 1-4U height is nice and would fit in a desk well, they're rather long, much longer than your typical desk is deep (usually 30").

      They're also extremely noisy, mainly due to the thin profile and high-speed fans, which would be annoying when you're trying to work. Desktop/tower cases are actually a lot better IMO, because they can use nice big 120mm fans which move a lot of air without much noise, whereas the thin 1U/2U server cases are limited to very small fans, and have to run them at high speeds to move enough air.

      I think I'll stick with my tower. There are cases you can get, however, which are basically just like towers on their sides (but with the 5.25" drives oriented horizontally), which would be simple to mount some drawer slides on and put in your desk.

  14. Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why this case is a bad idea :

    1. $700. That would buy a whole generation of core component upgrades (CPU/video card/RAM)
    2. It uses small, noisy fans rather than larger, quiet ones like this case : http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811103011
    3. Having a sweet looking computer case isn't going to impress anyone any more than having a sweet comic book collection. Save the money for spending things on stuff that actually (theoretically) have a chance of getting you laid, like better clothes or a nicer car.
    4. You could buy a vapor chill cooler instead and overclock like mad. This case won't give you any more performance than a standard case.

    In short, $700? No Wi Fi? Less space than a server case? Lame.

    1. Re:Terrible by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      No Wi Fi?

      WiFi has no place on a boxt that needs to have a power cord plugged into the wall to function.

    2. Re:Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. $700. That would buy a whole generation of core component upgrades (CPU/video card/RAM)

      *snip*

      Save the money for spending things on stuff that actually (theoretically) have a chance of getting you laid, like better clothes or a nicer car.

      Unnecessary step there. For $700 you could easily get four or five hour with a rather nice prostitute. Well over a dozen shags with a crackwhore.

    3. Re:Terrible by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Having a sweet looking computer case isn't going to impress anyone any more than having a sweet comic book collection.

      I agree with the rest of your comment, but not this. Imagine you're looking to hire a graphic design company to design your new ads for $NEXT_BIG_THING. Company A has nice, sleek-looking cases and dual-monitor setups on each designer's desk. Company B has yellowed, coffee-stained beige cases and a pair of old 15" CRTs on each desk. Assuming each company produces work of equivalent quality, and both are willing to charge the same price, which would you hire?

      Personally, I'd go for company A; nicer-looking machines implies nicer machines, which means that the designers are going to spend less time waiting for their machines to process things, which means that my work will get done faster.

      You'll find that most people looking to hire companies like that don't even make decisions based on that much information. They'll choose based solely on nicer-looking cases, because to them it implies that they're wealthier and therefore better at their jobs, with no regard for what the implications might be, and without bothering to investigate further.

      You're right in that it doesn't matter for the average gamer. But for a business who's looking to present the best possible image to clients? I can understand making sure every case looks high-end.

    4. Re:Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      That was a riff on the :

      No wi fi? Less space than a Nomad? Lame.

      Joke that is floating around on slashdot.

    5. Re:Terrible by Stevecrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does everyone assume fancy cars or superbikes will get you laid. When I bought my £4k superbike every person (men and women) all thought the said the same thing. The problem is if you pull up outside a crowded pub in a top class Mercedes/ Audi A4 controvertible or a superbike all that happens is 10 guys come up to have a look at it and tell you how awesome it is. Then they tell you how they'd love to own one and ask you how it drives/rides.

      It's like the myth that owning a motorcyle makes you cool to the opposite sex. Honestly in 7 years of riding I've met three random girls who liked the idea. Every other woman I've met when it comes up in conversation has used this exact phrase "Thats so cool, but I could never ride a bike its too scary." I ride a bike because its a joy, not because it makes me "cool". As for the Mecredes and the Audi pure luck from work rentals off of Hertz.

      My point? Buy what makes you happy, if its a superbike or a massive comic collection. Just because you have a particular possession you won't magically become more attractive to the opposite sex. For me this case seems like a massive waste of money, but then I think iPhones are massive wastes of money.

    6. Re:Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      I'd like to hear where you shop for hookers, because I hear that $700 might get you....3 hours with a decent quality hooker.

    7. Re:Terrible by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to hear where you shop for hookers, because I hear that $700 might get you....3 hours with a decent quality hooker.

      Thailand. $700 will get you a small harem for a week. Hell, you can have them build you a custom PC case while they're not otherwise occupied.

    8. Re:Terrible by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this guy up. +50 Insightful.
      I have owned a few cars that could be considered cool. I have owned 2 bikes that would be considered classics by many people. Have the cars or the bikes ever gotten me laid? Hell no!!!

      That said, the OP also mentions getting some nice clothes. That does help.
      So basic transportation, it is hard to date on public transport, and some nice clothes. Or at least clean clothes that fit properly.

      Lastly, would you really want to be with a person who is into you because of something you own? Be it a car, a super bike, $700 computer case, comic book collection, or the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    9. Re:Terrible by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's like the myth that owning a motorcyle makes you cool to the opposite sex.

      How is it a myth again? The rest of that paragraph even shows it:

      in 7 years of riding I've met three random girls who liked the idea. Every other woman I've met when it comes up in conversation has used this exact phrase "Thats so cool, but I could never ride a bike its too scary."

      See? By your own words, every woman you've met thinks it's cool. (We assume that the three random ones that like it think it's cool.)

      Incidentally, the ones who say "it's too scary" are waiting for you to convince them it's perfectly safe, so that you'll take them for a ride. :)

      I ride a bike because its a joy, not because it makes me "cool".

      Agreed. There is *nothing* like the freedom of a motorcycle.. the women are just a bonus.. (although not so much since I got married, but it's still a stroke of the ego when you're in your late 30's, get off the bike and a hot 19 year-old comes over to talk to you about it :)

    10. Re:Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, was referring to U.S. hookers. And yeah, in Argentina the smoking hot hookers are about $50 an hour if you know how to negotiate. So about 14 hours with one for $700, which is probably more cost effective than dating in the USA...

    11. Re:Terrible by maharb · · Score: 1

      Clearly you live in a wired house. For those of us that don't have a wired house WiFi is the cheapest solution since you only have to buy one device to deliver WiFi to all the wireless devices in your house such as Wii, XBox, Laptops, iPods, PCs, etc. Wiring up a house to have the same effect is expensive and then you are still tethered.

      I hope you are joking.

    12. Re:Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never tried it. What I do know is, an awesome computer probably doesn't help you AT ALL in getting some.

    13. Re:Terrible by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Just because you have a particular possession you won't magically become more attractive to the opposite sex.

      Smile. Be yourself. And clean your fingernails. Stuff you buy in order to get laid just puts a layer of indifference between you and the person you want to be with. It makes the statement "I'm really more interested in these things than I am in you."

      Of course, if that's the case - be honest, revel in it.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    14. Re:Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Wi Fi?

      WiFi has no place on a boxt that needs to have a power cord plugged into the wall to function.

      It does if the box can't be next to the router.

    15. Re:Terrible by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Reasons why it's a good idea:

      It isn't made of corrugated cardboard.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    16. Re:Terrible by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wiring up a house to have the same effect is expensive

      Cable runs with good-looking and unobtrusive molding do not cost that much and are easy to run along where the ceiling meets the wall. Unless you're actually running a data center, you only need to run a single Cat 5 to each point needing connectivity; that's what switches are for (and you can get a good switch dirt cheap).

      and then you are still tethered.

      Because once you have WiFi, the power cord doesn't tether you at all! Note that I'm not arguing against WiFi for actually mobile devices--I have WiFi in my own apartment. I'm using it to type this post on this laptop right now, and I also use it for my handheld game consoles. But if you're already tethered, you might as well go with the speed, security and reliability of having a wire.

    17. Re:Terrible by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need a wired house to use wired Ethernet. My cable wire runs into my office, where my cable modem, router, two computers, and printer are located. Why on earth would I use WiFi to connect all these to the router when it's right there on the same desk?

      WiFi is for the laptop which roams around the house. Everything else gets a wire. And when I need to transfer large files to/from the laptop, I take it into the office as well and plug in with a wire, because wired Ethernet is far faster than WiFi.

    18. Re:Terrible by Nethead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you have a particular possession you won't magically become more attractive to the opposite sex.

      A paid for house will.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    19. Re:Terrible by maharb · · Score: 1

      I know this may not be the case for everyone but in my case I would have to wire at minimum five rooms. Three bedrooms, a living room, and a room that is frequently used with laptops. This still leaves my kitchen unwired and I can see potential for use of internet there. Not even considering that I have five devices in my room with wireless capabilities that I would have to deal with, so it's not just one or two cables. The cable alone would easily top the cost of a wireless router not to mention the time, effort, switch/s and cost of trying to hide the wiring.

      In my situation I would be running a wired network bigger than some small businesses but instead I have a wireless network that covers about 15 devices in my house that can be managed easily, quickly and at an extremely low cost. Oh and some devices ONLY can use wireless. Since not all of them are transmitting at once there is no problem with speed or reliability and the biggest issue I have had is bouncing the router one a month or so.

      Sure it would be better if everything was wired, but I don't have money flowing out the ears to spend on the same end result I am already getting; internet all over my house.

      Maybe we have different definitions of expensive, I find it to be a relative term, i.e. the benefit I get vs the cost. I see the benefits but they are not great enough to get me to spend anything.

    20. Re:Terrible by maharb · · Score: 1

      See my other post in reply to Chris. Some of us have large numbers of devices all over and not just confined to the drop point. So it's not so absurd to want WiFi on all devices. I have 15 devices connected to my WiFi and none wired due to the location of the cable drop.

      Then again... why would a case have WiFi... anyway that's not the point.

    21. Re:Terrible by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, it certainly makes sense to connect far-flung devices with WiFi, rather than fishing CAT5e through your walls. My point is just that, in many houses, it's not atypical for the cable drop point to be in the same room as one of the computers (and probably usually the primary desktop computer), so it makes more sense to connect that one, and any other devices in that room, by wired ethernet. In my house, for instance, the cable goes through a splitter outside the house and enters in four locations: 1 in each of 3 bedrooms, and 1 in the living room. Of course, one of these rooms serves as my office, so I put the cable modem in there, along with the router and my network-connected laser printer, and my two desktop computers, and all of these are connected by wired Ethernet. If for some reason your house is set up so you can't put your cable modem and router in the same room as your desktop computer, then by all means use WiFi. But I think it's pretty typical for every bedroom in a modern house to have a cable outlet these days. Even if the house wasn't built that way, that's usually how the cable installers install it, by running the wires along the outside of the house. I have two rental houses built in the early 1950s, and I'm pretty sure both of those have cable in every bedroom too, just because that's how the installers do it.

    22. Re:Terrible by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > Why does everyone assume fancy cars or superbikes will get you laid.
      > ...
      > Just because you have a particular possession you won't magically become more attractive to the opposite sex.
      > ...

      This would be the advertisers attempted message ! (get them on the Golgafrincham B-Ark I say :-)

    23. Re:Terrible by Caue · · Score: 1

      doesn't help if you are butt-ugly.

    24. Re:Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am happy that this topic was brought up again and would like to use this opportunity to thank schon. A couple of months back he recommended getting a bike as a way of getting a girlfriend. I had already been playing with the idea of getting a bike and this nailed the decision.

      At that time, I was 30 and never had a girlfriend before. I had been trying out online dating for about half a year, unsuccessfully. On the same day that I brought the bike from the shop, I started talking to another girl on one of the online dating website (it was about my 50th attempt). A week later, she was my girlfriend and since then I practically moved into her place. She has a nice personality and is really cute, guys hit on her all the time.

      As a proper geek, I understand that anecdotal evidence != data and correlation != causation. It could have been simply coincidence, or that the 50 attempts made me better at conversation, or this was the first time the personalities and hobbies matched well, or maybe the bike gave me more confidence, or maybe I caught her at an emotionally "tuned" time. I don't know. I also don't care.

      So, take my story with a healthy dose of skepticism. I don't know if bikes work with opposite sex. But even if they don't, at least they don't make anything worse and as schon says, you still have your freedom.

    25. Re:Terrible by swb311 · · Score: 1

      Hate to troll, but - £4000 doesn't buy much of a superbike. £7-12000 will get you a mediocre stock BMW/Ducati. Some rice-rockets are slightly cheaper but lack most of the sex appeal. I've had tons of women ask for comment positively on and/or ask for rides on my crappy $6500 Kawasaki rice-rocket and had a similarly positive response to the $3000 Vespa scooter I drove in college. Guess showering helps?

    26. Re:Terrible by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Yeah, much rather have a decent sized case with oversized fans like this one for $54 bucks:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129042

      I'd spend the extra $646 and, you know, buy the rest of the parts for a pretty good machine..

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    27. Re:Terrible by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Gaming parts have gotten cheaper over the years. As it stands, $646 is enough to buy an entire machine that could run the latest games with all settings on "High". You don't need to be on the very bleeding edge...the $200 graphics cards and the $150 CPUs will run the games just fine.

    28. Re:Terrible by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Or 1 hour with 3 of them.

    29. Re:Terrible by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Sure it does, in terms of sex apeal, you're not trying to impress people who know about bikes, and a 1-2 year old R6 looks just as good as your brand new superduke.

    30. Re:Terrible by schon · · Score: 1

      Congrats, man! Happy to be of help :)

  15. Re:TFA says it is "jaw dropping". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so incredible, that it is in fact bigger on the inside than it is on the outside.

  16. Nice design work, BMW!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'll just wait for the $50 knockoff by Asus.

    1. Re:Nice design work, BMW!!!! by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Which will cut you six times whenever you open it up to figure out why the 3rd drive still isn't showing a week after you bundled it up and scrunched it into that space next t your desk where you cannot see any of the design features that seemed so cool in the ad.

      And of course the PSU cover will drool a little as it's melted slowly - like cheddar cheese in a greenhouse.

      You won't mind that in fact Asus does use more than one shade of black for their plastic parts.

      And you won't mind not being able to get a spare part for it. Ever.

      And I won't mind seeing one by the side of the road in a very few years, and thinkin 'no, thanks..."

      Worth $50? Maybe.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Nice design work, BMW!!!! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Huh? The case in the article is made by ThermalTake, not some high-end chassis maker like Lian Li or Silverstone. You're not going to get spare parts for it either. It's basically like Saturn trying to make a car to compete with Aston-Martin, and selling it with a price tag double that of the Vantage.

  17. no Firewire ports by arizonagroovejet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For $700 I'd expect at least one FW800 port on the front.

    1. Re:no Firewire ports by NoYob · · Score: 1

      For $700 I'd expect at least one FW800 port on the front.

      And a self-lubricating vagina and a mouth.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:no Firewire ports by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, both you and the other Firewire user are quite upset about this, I'm sure.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:no Firewire ports by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Now flamebait wasn't called for!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:no Firewire ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who uses firewire? Not a troll I'm serious. Who uses firewire?

  18. I see the bays... by repetty · · Score: 1

    I see the bays; where's the cabinet?

    1. Re:I see the bays... by wsanders · · Score: 1

      Mobo fits on the RHS, and big rectangular cutout for your enormous stack of CPU coolers.

      I don't see where the air is supposed to go, though.

      Oh, well this is just for the crowd who have a house full of lucite furniture and inflatable chairs, whoever they are.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  19. "Central pillar" by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Rather than a standard aluminum box, the Thermaltake Level 10 would incorporate a central pillar, with individual compartments hanging from it for the motherboard...

    Now, I don't know what definition of "central pillar" they're using, but I would think that, at the very least, it would mean that components wouldn't all be mounted on one side of a giant panel that stretches from front to back and top to bottom.

    It definitely looks "cool" but it also looks gigantic, heavy, and poorly balanced â" if you actually attempt to use that handle they stuck on there, I can't see how you don't cut up your shins on the razor-sharp flared base as 50 pounds of steel swings inconveniently towards you.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:"Central pillar" by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      The next version comes with a pair of complimentary hockey shin guards.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    2. Re:"Central pillar" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It definitely looks "cool" but it also looks gigantic, heavy, and poorly balanced

      Maybe that's why it weighs so much: there's probably a big weight in the bottom to keep it from tipping over.

      Personally, I'd prefer a case that doesn't need a giant counterweight to keep it stable.

  20. Dumb. by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been a system builder since the 486DX2 66MHz days and of all the case designs I've seen come, go, and be claimed to be the next coming, the only one to ever be a perfect blend of form and function is the Mac Pro cases by Apple. I'm not even a fanboy, and most of those cases probably were never even cracked, but there is no denying them. This thing is just dumb.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Dumb. by value_added · · Score: 1

      [O]f all the case designs I've seen come, go, and be claimed to be the next coming, the only one to ever be a perfect blend of form and function is the Mac Pro cases by Apple.

      My next system will be a Mac Pro for that very reason.

      I sat down and calculated the costs of building something similar and compared that to the standard but comparable server offerings from Dell, among others. The first was cheaper, but simply wasn't worth the effort, and there was no guarantee I'd end up with something as good, or as quiet. The second, well, who really wants to run something that sounds like multiple hairdryers if you don't have a server room?

      The irony, of course, is I won't be running OS X.

    2. Re:Dumb. by amazeofdeath · · Score: 1

      Lian-Li makes somewhat similar cases than what Mac Pros have. Full aluminum cases with wheels, nice looks, and more easily available for the "normal" PC builder than Mac Pro cases.

      --
      U+F8FF
  21. It looks like an old piece of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telephone switching equipment. Seriously, an expensive design and manufacturing process and its really not that good looking.

  22. It's a luggable. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Didn't you see the handle? It's clearly meant to be a "luggable." A full-sized computer that you can move about the house when you want. Do you want to have to fish cat 5 through all the convenient locations in your house just to take full advantage of it? Wired ethernet has its own security problems btw.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:It's a luggable. by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Wired ethernet has its own security problems btw.

      Oh pray tell

    2. Re:It's a luggable. by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It weights 50lbs, you're not going to move it around your house at will unless you shove some wheels on it. Then you have to drag your monitor, find a flat place for the keyboard, plug all the 20 cables back in and so on. There's a handle I'm guessing so you can move it around at all without spending the next week with ice on your back.

    3. Re:It's a luggable. by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Something I wish my ThermalTake Armor had! It's a pretty nice case, but damn I wish I bought the Aluminium model. Between the ups, my server and my PC that I moved around on the weekend, my back is a tad sore!

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    4. Re:It's a luggable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a handle I'm guessing so you can move it around at all without spending the next week with ice on your back.

      Obviously you are doing it wrong, you are supposed to lift with your knees not your back!

  23. $700 for What? by greymond · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I think this case looks cool and I am assuming that keeping each component separate really will cut down on the overall heat generated by the computer. However, for $700 (a little less in some cases) you could get a water or liquid cooled case from Xoxide which would, in my theorycrafting as I haven't played with this case hands on, would keep your components a lot cooler. Perhaps if this case was around the $350 range it'd be more appealing to me.

  24. Tag suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest this be tagged onecasetorulethemall.

    1. Re:Tag suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Why would anybody want to rule the mall?

    2. Re:Tag suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does the mall have to do with it?

  25. Looks extruded from a smart surface by tibman · · Score: 1

    It looks like a computer was extruded out from a smart surface or something. The appearence is very appealing to me, very few structural parts. That must be why it is made of metal instead of plastic. Not seeing 80/120mm fan grills all over the place looks strange too. I'm skeptical about how cool it actually is... well, air cooling anyways.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  26. Waiting for next revision by Stealth+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

    My case needs to go to eleven.

    --
    Evil is as eval("does");
    1. Re:Waiting for next revision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be a good marketing scheme for one of the competitors, awesome even.

      "Introducing the Antec Eleven. Where cool goes up to [i]eleven[/i]!"

  27. Targeted at the wrong market? by Seriph · · Score: 1

    OK I'm one of the saps that are able and willing to lay down $700 (well actually about 500 UKP) for an interestingly designed computer case as long as it's functional and well built. The only problem is that this one's looks just don't appeal to me in the way that something like the Mac Pro cases do.

    1. Re:Targeted at the wrong market? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I was just looking at that and the compartmentalized cooling is basically the same thing that apple has been doing since the powermac g5's came out. Some models have up to 7 fans, all of which are speed controlled and managed by sometimes over 11 temperature sensors. Dedicated fans for optical drive, power supply (intake as well as exhaust), processors, expansion slot bay.

      Instead of just cracking up the fans to max RPMs all the time, they only spin as fast as is necessary to keep things in spec for each zone. And it also avoids the huge temperature swings that occur in fixed fan systems that go from frigid to warm and back again every time you do something.

      Makes working on them slightly more difficult though with having to remove plates and covers etc. Though for the most part apple does a really good job of keeping the fans out of your way. For the PMG5 for instance, the processor fans have to be removed to add RAM, but doing that involves flipping a latch, swinging open a door, swinging open an air guide, and pulling a fan back on a guide and socket. No tools, and still faster access than almost anything. The new mac pros you just open the door (no air guide to bother with) and pull out the memory cards. (no fan to remove)

      BUT... take a quad G5 and put something intense on it, and you will known the true meaning of "loud computer". (the models with the special high current power cord) We had one of those generate a noticeable air movement 25 feet down a hallway when going full tilt, it almost sounded like a small shop-vac. But, as soon as we quit the test apps, it was dead silent again within 25 seconds. That's how things aught to work. Fortunately the new mac pros run soooo much cooler that you never get anywhere near that much noise when they're cracked wide open encoding video etc.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  28. level 10? by sukotto · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Screw that. I only use cases that go up to 11.

    --
    Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    1. Re:level 10? by sukotto · · Score: 1

      beaten by stealth dave
      funny becomes redundant
      better luck next time :-(

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  29. Here's why. by NoYob · · Score: 1

    ...designed in conjunction with BMW DesignWorks.

    Next up, case designs by Ferrari, Gucci, Louis Vuitton, etc....

    Then Ralph Lauren will do one for the bankers.

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    1. Re:Here's why. by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      Ferrari's already been done by Acer...

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  30. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just like a pussy!

  31. not very interesting by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would prefer something with more class, more style, more customization and a price tag that doesn't make one vomit blood.

    This is going to be my next case. Wood and brass (fake brass, but close enough). Great thing about a wood case is that it is easily modifiable with simple household tools.
    http://www.nmediapc.com/htpc8000.htm

    1. Re:not very interesting by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow. That thing's only 100 bucks at newegg. That's really not bad for a classy-looking case that would actually fit in in the family room. A little old tyme, but nice.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:not very interesting by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Its not expensive, is very stylish and easily modifiable. Unlike the huge clunky piece of steel the original article is about (some could justifiable argue that the Level 10 is stylish, but that is in the eye of the beholder).

      One thing that I plan on doing is modding the top panel to hinge open instead of screw down, in that space above the drive bays I will have space for a multimedia remote, wireless mouse and possibly a wireless keyboard if I can find one small enough for a reasonable price.

    3. Re:not very interesting by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I would prefer something with more class, more style, more customization and a price tag that doesn't make one vomit blood.

      I've always thought of Lian Li as the top drawr in design, and they have a lot of nice ones for less than $700.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:not very interesting by radish · · Score: 1

      Clearly it's a personal thing, but I think that's astonishingly ugly (and it certainly wouldn't fit in any room in my house). Having said that, I don't really like the one in the OP either. Lesson: buy what you like :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:not very interesting by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Lian Li definitely makes some nice stuff as well. I just like the uniqueness of wood.

    6. Re:not very interesting by noidentity · · Score: 1

      This is going to be my next case. Wood and brass (fake brass, but close enough). Great thing about a wood case is that it is easily modifiable with simple household tools. http://www.nmediapc.com/htpc8000.htm

      Great case, but that 256-character web page title sure is funny. Looks like they even wanted it longer, but their software truncated it:

      <title>NMEDIAPC.com - the leading Home Theater PC componenets manufactory who provide one stop shop for your HTPC needs. Visit us to build your dream HTPC, Media Center PC and Home Media server. We offer the most quiet, cooler, compact and multi-functional case, </title>

    7. Re:not very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you've got good fans - wood is a really good insulator. So much so that you can walk on the live coals of burning wood without burning your feet and you can pick up and throw a burning log which has rolled out of a fire back into the fire without burning yourself (should the need arise).

  32. Cables length? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the strengths and unfortunate weaknesses of PCs is that components are interchangable. This is a plus, since it means anyone can replace a part, but the downside is, the replacement parts may not fit the "concept" quite wel.

    In this case, it appears that while there's the central stand for wire routing, I'm not sure if it comes with the requisite power supply and cables trimmed to the right length. Too much cable is OK, you can hide the slack in the tower, but more often than not, cables are just a wee bit too short.

    A design like the old G4 towers where one side flips down with the motherboard exposed and all the cables running along the edge is what I envision a good case to be, but even in OEM PC designs from Dell and the like, they incorporate such "flip open" design. Unfortunately, it fails as some cable is too short, meaning it flips open a little bit, you disconnect it, open it more, disconnect the next too-short cable, etc. A real mess that spoils the nice servicability.

    My one concern is that - what happens if the power supply you bought doesn't have cables that reach? You have to invest in extensions? Or is that vertical stand contain a backplane, and all you do is plug the power/sata/IDE/etc cables into it, where they will go to the right component?

  33. Will it hold a Mac by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    mother board and components? If so, that'd be a great case to replace the boring steel box. All you need the is a cool keyboard / mouse / monitor to finish it off.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Will it hold a Mac by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great way to get a nice $2000 machine for only $4000. After all that do you end up with a surplus case, keyboard, mouse, and monitor? Or can you actually buy a Mac without the I/O devices? Wouldn't it be easier to just buy the components individually, then install them?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  34. Full Circle by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is how things used to be...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. car with built-in centrifuge by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Depends, are you making meth out of the trunk? if so it might come in handy.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Not everyone can afford top of the line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's fine, a Honda Civic will get you from point A to point B too, but for those of us who CAN afford the best things, a Porsche 996 GT2 will do just fine, thank you very much. Same goes for this case. Sure I could cheap out and get a LIAN-LI or some other POS, but why? When you can afford the best, why would you care about the rest?

    1. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Actually, the civic will probably have the better engine and handling.

      Porsches are great if you are having a midlife crisis and not much else.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure I could cheap out and get a LIAN-LI or some other POS, but why?

      Clearly you don't know what you are talking about; Lian-Li make excellent kit. A Lian-Li case costs more than a no-name beige box, but it's totally worth it.

      Every computer I build is a Lian-Li box plus some sort of quality power supply.

    3. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSX-R FTW!

      Course Honda stopped making them what 5-6 years ago?

      Stupid companies and their stupid lack of sports cars....

    4. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the civic will probably have the better engine and handling.

      Are you mad?

    5. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      Like, totally! Stupid car companies ceasing production on a 15-year old platform with a high cost of production and very few sales. It's only fitting that you bring up the NSX in an article about a computer case that costs $700 but is only moderately cool.

    6. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the civic will probably have the better engine and handling. Porsches are great if you are having a midlife crisis and not much else.

      ROTFLMAO. Are you fucking serious? Let me guess, you have a Honda Civic Si, you've put a cold air intake and have cut your springs, and now think you can hang with the big boys? You stupid loser. You wouldn't be able to keep up with my 996 GT2 if you put a fucking rocket on the back of that tin can. Your type really aught to stick to building crappy little PC's, and leave the real engineering skills to the men.

    7. Re:Not everyone can afford top of the line by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter how good the engine or handling are, you're still driving a civic.

  37. I wouldn't want to dust it... by Angostura · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...imagine how dusty that thing will get after a week or two.

  38. Re:TFA says it is "jaw dropping". by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    The only things jaw-dropping about this case are the price and either the noise level or the hard drive failure rate. In that small an enclosure, hard drives are going to heat up rather severely unless you move a lot of air past them, and if you do that, it's going to be loud. The laws of physics are at work here.... It's the same reason external hard drive cases are not generally recommended for continuous use.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  39. Cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys still use cases? I just set mine on the desk with all the parts exposed.

  40. Reminds me of Televideo's attempt at a PC... by argent · · Score: 1

    It was based on a Z80 and ran CP/M, had a vertical case and a pivoting CRT attached to the side.

    There is nothing new under the sun.

    1. Re:Reminds me of Televideo's attempt at a PC... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      http://www.old-computers.com/MUSEUM/photos.asp?t=1&c=1077&st=1

      I can see where your coming from, but its really not the same thing.

    2. Re:Reminds me of Televideo's attempt at a PC... by argent · · Score: 1

      They share ugly genes.

    3. Re:Reminds me of Televideo's attempt at a PC... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      True - I think most pc's back then were somewhat ugly though.

  41. Absurd. Like something out of the movie Brazil... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    I appreciate the idea of compartmentalized PC cases designed
    to optimize cooling and whatnot but this doesn't seem to be
    that. It looks like they were going out of their way to make
    something look ridiculous. Well they succeeded. Now I would
    welcome more of a "server case" approach to having a Quad Core
    box with 6 drives in it. This thing isn't that.

    Antec makes some cases that are a more serious approach to this idea.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  42. USELESS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It doesn't go to 11!

  43. The price of two Lian Li 343B by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No thanks. I'll take my Big Black Box of Death over this modular monstrosity any day of the week (and for half the price).

  44. Remember, folks by bonch · · Score: 1, Funny

    Remember, folks:

    • If a PC user spends the money on something jaw-droppingly cool, they're just a hobbyist who's into cool computer hardware.
    • If a Mac user spends the money on something jaw-droppingly cool, they're an elitist snob who pays more for white plastic with a logo on it.
    1. Re:Remember, folks by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If a Mac user spends the money on something jaw-droppingly cool, they're an elitist snob who pays more for white plastic with a logo on it.

      Actually no, they're still just a hobbyist who's into cool computer hardware because nothing that could be described as "jaw-droppingly cool" comes in white plastic with an Apple logo on it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  45. Looks nice but by houghi · · Score: 1

    It looks nice, but I am more interested in having less, and I mean much less, wires at my desk.

    Power for my sound, 2 monitors, box, external HD, external DVD, cellphone, printer, router/modem.
    And then all the wires to connect the things. OK, I could loose one wire if I would go wireless. That would save me about 1m of wire.

    I don't want a nice looking PC, If possible I do not want to see my PC at all.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  46. LaCie Joule drive system by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember LaCie's Joule Drive system from the 90's? Had a base case with power and drive and then a top that could come off so you could add more scsi devices. Always wanted a computer put together like this.

    This case looks like someone took that idea and ran.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  47. I want! by log0n · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  48. Meh by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    At $700, this looks like an overly-expensive and inflexible gimmick to me. For instance, what happens if I want to use 2.5" disks instead of the usual 3.5" inch disks that this chassis seems to support? With some minimal modding, I could fit in more than six, but not in this case. And what's that silly handle for at the top of the chassis? I can already feel the flared bottom edge of the case bumping against my shins.

    1. Re:Meh by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      if you had RTFA, you would notice that the hot swapping bays support both 3.5" and 2.5" disks. But yes, it does look oversized, over weight and uncomfortable to transport.

    2. Re:Meh by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      I LIKE the fact that it has a handle! It's the one thing missing on most PC cases for easy transportation. In my PC, I now use a hole where a floppy disk could be, and some metal in the back, as handle, but one nice solid one on top would have been much handier.

  49. Makes Mountain Mods seem affordable by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

    Honestly it doesn't do that much for me. I can appreciate that it's different - and probably better - than most of the cases we can choose from today but it isn't (IMO) *substantially* better. The good news though is that, at $700, when I go for a Mountain Mods on my next custom build it will seem like a *bargain* by comparison.

    --
    "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
  50. Wait, I've got another one: by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I rather like the "ugly black behemoth".

    So does your mom, I hear.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  51. One last one: by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    I rather like the "ugly black behemoth".

    No need to bring Star Jones into this discussion.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:One last one: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello 2002!

  52. Great many cracks and holes by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Great many cracks and holes. Should suit the germs in the gathering dust just fine.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  53. He's paraphrasing an infamous CmdrTaco quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    (from his summary writing up the first ever iPod launch)

    http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257

  54. Yes but... by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

    ... Does it run linux?

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  55. fans by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

    2. It uses small, noisy fans rather than larger, quiet ones like this case

    This is true, but there is a substantial efficiency to be gained by having a well defined air-flow. Instead of having one big space like the case you linked to, this case presumably has a number of more or less laminar flow paths through each device. This makes it so that you have to spin the fans less to get the same volume of mixing.

    Apple was kind of forced into doing this when they switched to the G5s, which were notoriously power hungry and ran hot. My old dual G5 would sound just sweet until you actually used it to do something, then it sounded like jet engine taking off. They kept a similar case design when they switched to intel, they have three separate compartments that each have their own cooling. In the linked image, the top, middle and bottom sections of the case are each cooled separately. One is for the processor(s), one for the video and other cards, and one for the optical drives and power supply. The result is that my new xeon doesn't sound like much at all, doing or something or not. It's actually quite a nice case design.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  56. Wow! That case is.... by elkto · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is soooooo Stupid.....
    And sooooo Awesome!!!!!!!!
    I lust for one!

  57. Doesn't look very versatile... by feepness · · Score: 1

    Will double width cards fit? Most cards are double width nowadays.

    What about SLI? It seems the connectors would be blocked.

  58. It's an 1980s CD Tower! by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Wow, I can make my computer look like a cheesy CD tower...

    --
    This is my sig.
  59. Obligatory by OricAtmos48K · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia you get "Level 700" concept case for $10 !

  60. Seems a tad pointless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why people care what their case looks like, or why they would spend so much on one, unless it was a Lian-li case.

    It's like those people who put massive spoilers and exhausts on their Honda Civics and immediately think they're Vin Diesel.

  61. For $700 I expect more by kimvette · · Score: 1

    At $700 I expect 11 fans, triple-redundant power supplies, a hot-swap SATA or SAS backplane, an air shroud, intrusion detection, optional rack mount kit, and something which is at least somewhat attractive. That chassis looks like a cheap Star Wars prop.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  62. So which is it? by Clockwork+Apple · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either "The case looks like a prop from 2001" or "It's absolutely unlike anything I've ever seen before."

    Make up your mind.

    C.

    --
    "Doctor, it's not the voices I hear in MY head, but the voices I hear in YOUR head that really frighten me."
  63. Ok-A Crysis of $$$ proportions. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Granted, it's not hard to put together a parts list far exceeding that cost, but no gamer really needs anything that expensive."

    Haven't tried running Crysis on maximum settings have you?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Ok-A Crysis of $$$ proportions. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Honestly that joke is getting pretty old... Crysis runs fine at max settings on a computer with slightly lower specs than mine.

  64. same thing happened to me by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone assume fancy cars or superbikes will get you laid. When I bought my £4k superbike every person (men and women) all thought the said the same thing. The problem is if you pull up outside a crowded pub in a top class Mercedes/ Audi A4 controvertible or a superbike all that happens is 10 guys come up to have a look at it and tell you how awesome it is. Then they tell you how they'd love to own one and ask you how it drives/rides.

    It's like the myth that owning a motorcyle makes you cool to the opposite sex. Honestly in 7 years of riding I've met three random girls who liked the idea. Every other woman I've met when it comes up in conversation has used this exact phrase "Thats so cool, but I could never ride a bike its too scary."

    That was exactly the response I got when I bought my airplane! I can count on one hand the number of girls who were willing to go up in it (small plane = scary as hell to most people). I suspect the only real "chick magnets" are boats...generally when they're tied up at the dock, with a bottle of champaign chilling on the deck.

    Luckilly when I was dating my wife she overcame her fear of small planes and was supportive of my crack^H^H^H^H^H aviation habit, and as a result we've had some awesome trips together around the US and Canada...but I digress.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  65. Shiny new case, er, lack of shine but new case! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Very cool case. I wonder if it can take four NVidia Cards?

  66. 700 dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see this discussion somewhere in a Mos Eisley Cantina.

    "700???? We could almost buy our own PC for that."

    "But who's gonna build the rig kid. You?"

  67. Pretty! by TigerTails · · Score: 1

    This is the most beautiful case I've ever seen! Cases have had various compartments before.. but this has the compartments.. and forgot about the rest of the case! It's black! It's Red! It has a key! It has lights! What more could you POSSIBLY want from a case?!