Slashdot Mirror


Communicator Clothing

coondoggie writes "The crew of the classic science-fiction show's Starship Enterprise wore small devices on their chests that they could tap to communicate instantly with their colleagues. Such communications technology is now closer to reality thanks to a Finnish company which this week demonstrated high-tech clothing that can send and receive messages via satellite. The demonstrator antenna, built by the Patria Aviation Oy company, looks like a simple patch of cloth but is capable of operating in the Iridium and GPS frequency band as part of clothing. The Iridium satellites allow two-way voice and data communication, while GPS provides positional data to the user. Iridium could also relay the position of the user."

134 comments

  1. !Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The crew of the classic science-fiction show's Starship Enterprise wore small devices on their chests that they could tap to communicate instantly with their colleagues."

    No, that was the crew of the tenth-rate spin-off's Starship Enterprise.

    1. Re:!Classic by JustinRLynn · · Score: 1

      This is not uncommon in reporting. See good old TVTropes's Cowboy Bebop At His Computer article for other examples. Also, just couldn't pass up the chance to give others the same wiki walk I got -- but if you need the next few hours, don't look.

    2. Re:!Classic by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 1

      Need new moderation option: Evil.

    3. Re:!Classic by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Having never seen Cowboy Bebop I don't know exactly what's wrong with that image (the article doesn't say, but It does get your point across :D), but I'm guessing that a) the character isn't Cowboy Bebop, b) It's a girl and c) it's not their computer

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:!Classic by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Me neither. But I scrolled down.

      First example:

      The picture above shows the archetypal example, whence the trope gets its name. For the unfamiliar: The character is female. She is named Ed. And she is a supporting character at best. Cowboy Bebop is the show's name, where "cowboy" is a slang term for bounty hunter, and Bebop is the name of the main characters' ship. Also, for some reason, they capitalized the second "B" in Bebop. At least she's at a computer.

              * A computer that appears to be seven feet tall.
              * They wrote it as BeBop, with the second capital B, because that's the way it's written on the ship itself. Since the title only appears in all caps elsewhere, that's the official lower-case spelling. So Yeah...

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:!Classic by Canazza · · Score: 1

      ah, I see it. Noscript prevented the on-page Javascript from loading the extra content. Stupid site.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    6. Re:!Classic by mlush · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps xkcd

    7. Re:!Classic by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Need new moderation option: Evil.

      The real hard choice is between Evil(+1) and Evil(-1).

    8. Re:!Classic by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Actually, Edward is one of the main characters, not supporting. 'Radical Edward' is responsible for quite a few of the main events that happen during the entire storyline - including getting Faye Valentine to finally go investigate and come to terms with her past. She may not have as many -action- sequences as the others, but her parts of the plot are definitely integral to the whole, and serve to advance the story in a way that some of the other 'main' characters do not.

      Now, if you ask me, Ein was the real hero of the series, for too many reasons to list here. If you've watched the series extensively, you just might agree :)

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    9. Re:!Classic by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like Vernor Vinge's novel "Rainbow's End" where the characters are able to interface with computers built into their clothing by how they move and what they wear. This allows for a fairly complex interface to ubiquitous "augmented reality"...much more immersible than just an iPhone or a set of i-glasses and a portable computer.

      Obligatory Wikipedia reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows_End

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    10. Re:!Classic by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Stupid Add-On?

      --
      bickerdyke
    11. Re:!Classic by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      Kutulhu(+1), why settle for the lesser evil?

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    12. Re:!Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supid comment.

    13. Re:!Classic by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Kutulhu(+1), why settle for the lesser evil?

      Cthulhu(+1), why settle for the lesser spelling?

    14. Re:!Classic by srobert · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out Comic-Book Guy.

    15. Re:!Classic by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was thinking the same thing, and I'm sure other people were too. Except the fact that TNG was NOT 10th rate! It beat the crap out of TOS and was the best trek of all time!

      /me points nerd death ray in AC's direction.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    16. Re:!Classic by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Kutulhu(+1), why settle for the lesser evil?

      Cthulhu(+1), why settle for the lesser spelling?

      Mebbe he was punning on Kubuntu.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    17. Re:!Classic by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Funny

      It beat the crap out of TOS and was the best trek of all time!

      Thanks for pointing that out, Kanye, but the award is being presented to TOS.

    18. Re:!Classic by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Sort-of nitpicking: there's no apostrophe in "Rainbows". This is semi-important to the story.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    19. Re:!Classic by JWW · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish I still had some mod points!

    20. Re:!Classic by MyLongNickName · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This comment thread isn't big enough for the two of us...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    21. Re:!Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Next Generation through Voyager used commbadges, as did the Next Generation movies...and *most* of the writing for TNG (season 2 onward) was of *much* higher quality than The Original Series (which is still a classic, BTW).

  2. Allrightium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cool, but I really dislike anything that makes tracking people any easier.

    1. Re:Allrightium by dougisfunny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Communication must be hard for you if you dislike it so much then.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    2. Re:Allrightium by selven · · Score: 1

      Communicating without revealing anything about yourself is not at all inconceivable.

    3. Re:Allrightium by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate hiking boots?

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
    4. Re:Allrightium by iJusten · · Score: 1

      The summary doesn't mention that Patria builds military ordnance. Those patches are meant for soldiers, not civilians (though civilian models might be forthcoming). Imagine how useful that patch would be on the field. It weights less than GPS/radio units, it's easier to wield etc.

      When people mention that this is akin to Star Trek-military uniforms, they are completely right. This is for the armed forces.

      --
      Chronologically late.
    5. Re:Allrightium by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      You have to send signals, how can you do that without giving away your position! And for long range communication blanketing an entire country with signals just to you simply isn't something anybody can be arsed to do. While ham operators do it on short/medium range it does not scale well. The best anonymity you can hope for is separation of your number from your name and that the phone companies don't hand this over to just anybody (so if your in the US your fucked)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    6. Re:Allrightium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, but I really dislike anything that makes tracking people any easier.

      got something to hide then cus the only people that need to be affraid of their wherabouts being know are convicts and the convict types.

    7. Re:Allrightium by selven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't have to send the message directly to your target. You send it through a wire (or over a wireless system with a 1m range) to a node which then sends it to a major node and so on, with 256 bit encryption and dummy messages constantly being sent so a wiretapper wouldn't know when someone was actually sending something. It's conceivable.

    8. Re:Allrightium by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Short of using something like tor (huge overhead so nobody will bother), they can still backtrack all the hops till they are within range to catch you sending the original signal. Dummy messages just mean that your position (within your cell) is constantly being given away.

      Anybody who wants to send you a message is going to need an address to send the message to, so either you have them send their message everywhere (huge overhead, nobody CBA) or you provide them with you address that limits you to 1 cell.

      Sure its conceivable, just like anonymous internet access is conceivable, but its not very practical, so the unparanoid among us will always be giving our position away in order for communications to work efficiently.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    9. Re:Allrightium by selven · · Score: 1

      And if you're not paranoid, you don't care about your position being revealed so the point is moot. If you are paranoid, the overhead doesn't matter - even 100x overhead on 1000 words of plaintext would these days transfer within seconds.

    10. Re:Allrightium by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Cool, but I really dislike anything that makes tracking people any easier.

      I'm sure you'll regret that when they can't lock the transporters on you when you are stranded on the surface of Tackion V.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  3. chests? by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought the classic crew had to press a button on the wall and talk into the microphone?

    1. Re:chests? by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bad summary, the specific (first instance) show is Star Trek: The Next Generation. The origional series did not have wearable communicators, but instead, handheld devices.

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    2. Re:chests? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Captain Kirk would rather walk up to the cute Ensign, tap her chest, and say, "Do you mind if I use your phone?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:chests? by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come on....

      perhaps meanwhile TNG became a classic too?

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:chests? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      LOL (in lieu of mod points)

    5. Re:chests? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Oh come on....

      perhaps meanwhile TNG became a classic too?

      Star trek - councilors in space. On a five year mission to find new life and solve its emotional problems.

      Voyager or DS9 might become classics but TNG was crippled by political correctness.

    6. Re:chests? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Voyager or DS9 might become classics

      Are you a betting man?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    7. Re:chests? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Episodes of an 80s TV series were cripped by "political correctness" because they had Counseller Troy?

      Blimey, is there anything that doesn't get labelled "political correctness" these days?

    8. Re:chests? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Political correctness my ass, it's no more crippled by politics than any good sciences fiction, it explores current and/or interesting political/emotional issues using new tech/settings. Star-trek TOS was an interesting action show but most of the episodes were pretty boilerplate (not to say they didn't have some good ones) it wasn't until they did the movies that it became a quality science fiction series. TNG (series not films) was the best series of the star-trek franchise . While i agree the idea of a councillor on the bridge is retarded, the concept of the extreme stress of being in space for prolonged periods of time is pretty common amongst good stories (e.g 1954-sucker bait, asimov where they have a psychologist who is effectively number 2 to the captain), the fact that she is allowed on the bridge in pyjamas is just something you have to look past.

      Arguments can be made for DS9, which is good but that itself is a very political show often revolving around the politics of Bajor+The federation+Cardasians, and many of the episodes are just as political as TNG. While voyager is an interesting show they nerf the borg (originally nerfed by a TNG film but voyager really make them noobs) which are one of the most interesting concepts in star-trek. While both DS9 & Voyager are good shows you don't see the range of issues and interactions you get with TNG, they may all become casics but it will be TNG > DS9 > Voyager.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    9. Re:chests? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      When the original post uses a definite article, "THE classic science-fiction show", that implies that there can be only one.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    10. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhura had blue tooth though.

    11. Re:chests? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on! Even in Next Generation the communicators were badges that were added to the uniform, not built into it. No Star Trek featured any clothing with built in communicators (at least the Federation never had that tech). If you're going to count stuff like that, well then, we've had wearable electronics since the invention of the digital watch. No, wait! Since the invention of the walkie talkie.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counsellor, you ignorant fuck.

    13. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And voyager wasn't???? Let me see: black vulcan, female captain, Indian second officer. I am not sure I have seen more PCness in any other series. Note: I see no problem per se with any of these things happening it was just a bit much to make them all happen at the same time. I won't even get into the number of crew killed on that ship. They must have had a replicator spitting out people with only first names in the back.

    14. Re:chests? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Only when they were in the ship. When they were on a planet they had cell phones. I'm still amazed that most of the "geew whis they'll never have this shit" shit is common now. I expected the STNG communicators by now; my old RAZR could call Mike by my pressing a button and saying his name, and it wasn;t much bigger than the STNG communicators.

      TFS isn't just wrong about the "classic" part, the NG communicators weren't sewn into the uniforms, they were sort of pinless pins that were often removed for dramatic effect.

      Clearly the submitter was a clueless youngster.

    15. Re:chests? by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      the fact that she is allowed on the bridge in pyjamas is just something you have to look past

      Screw that, when took her out of pajamas and into a normal uniform, I was actually quite disappointed! :)

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    16. Re:chests? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Star trek - councilors in space. On a five year mission to find new life and solve its emotional problems.

      "Captain, I sense... millions of horny geeks staring at my cleavage..."

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    17. Re:chests? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So far the problem is power storage. A lot of things have come to pass from science fiction, but pretty much everyone was overly optimistic about energy storage density in the future -- I mean, we are IN the future that a lot of them foresaw, except that the batteries are bigger and the solar panels are shittier. I keep hearing that's about to improve dramatically; I am not holding my breath.

      Otherwise, you can get a similar effect with your RAZR and a bluetooth headset. You hit the button, say "name dial" or something like that, and then say the name. Then it asks you if you meant several things you didn't mean, and you say "no" a few times, and then it comes up with the right one, then you say yes, then it asks you which number to call... okay, so Motorola isn't Lord of the Interface. I think their product names prove that. IMA CUT YOU WITH MY PHONE! RAZR BITCH!!!11!`1!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:chests? by deprecated · · Score: 2

      No. No it has not. Please turn in your nerd badge at the airlock.

    19. Re:chests? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The only time I had trouble voice dialing with it was 1) it confused "Mike" with "Mom" and 2) in a noisy environment, like in a bar (where you'd have to go outside to hear anyway) or on the highway (where the voice dialing was the most useful).

      But the battery in the phone I have now is about the size of a STNG comminucator. Take away the screen and the buttons and it would fit.

    20. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When the original post uses a definite article, "THE classic science-fiction show", that implies that there can be only one.

      No it doesn't. If you say "the classic Chevy Corvette," it doesn't imply that there are no other classic cars (or even that Chevy made no other classics).

      However, if you refer to "the classic science-fiction show's Starship Enterprise," it strongly implies TOS because we only started calling it "classic" after newer ST series came out.

    21. Re:chests? by dasherjan · · Score: 1

      Unless my memory fails me. TOS was called Star Trek. The show from the early 2000's was called Enterprise. As far as I know there wasn't a series called "Starship Enterprise". So I'm thinking that the submitter(?) was just trying to use an example that "everyone" could relate to. So that people could think wow the future is almost here! Why does it matter what series had them and what the definition of THE is. Check out the cool tech! :)

    22. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless my memory fails me. TOS was called Star Trek. The show from the early 2000's was called Enterprise. As far as I know there wasn't a series called "Starship Enterprise". So I'm thinking that the submitter(?) was just trying to use an example that "everyone" could relate to

      Except for that apostrophe: "classics science-fiction show's Starship Enterprise", meaning the ship from the classic show. I don't know how you could interpret that to imply that he was talking about a show called "Starship Enterprise". I wish he would have just said "TNG" and saved us a geek headache.

    23. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -2 OBVIOUS troll

    24. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The only time I had trouble voice dialing with it was 1) it confused "Mike" with "Mom"

      I said "Phoenix" and it misdialed "Fiji."

    25. Re:chests? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      sory dude, I'm not the one that needs therapy!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    26. Re:chests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, set Star Trek's annoying cast members aside, or there's no point in considering the franchise at all. Troi and the Crushers were really bad; the rest didn't really bother me, and I liked Picard, Data, and Geordi rather well. I'd take your Troi and raise you a Chekhov or a Neelix any day. It's really rare to find a sci-fi series that doesn't have at least one clown bearing a too-prominent role.

      Back to the main point, I didn't mind TNG's recurring focus on diplomacy. I also didn't mind seeing an unabashedly utopian take on the future, in contrast to the ENDLESS mankind-at-war/post-apocalyptic/cowboys in space series out there. Not that TNG didn't do some of that, but TNG's vision of a mankind that had largely evolved beyond greed and conquest as motivators was pleasant. The human race was not actually at war with anyone (save the Borg); science, exploration, leadership, beneficent commerce, and cultural discourse seemed to be the primary goals people pursued. The "ordinary folks" they bumped into were almost always colonists, scientists, or the occasional trader. Realism, grittiness, and action are all good, but don't just trash the occasional fairytale, either. Occasionally, it's nice to dream about a future that doesn't teem with either warfare or outrageous civil management failures.

    27. Re:chests? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, to my generation, TOS always was very silly. Weird people in 60/70s clothes and the like, fighting in an incredibly primitive way (eg the two handed fist on the back, or those "grandpa kicks"), lacking anything that could be called believable special effects or aliens, with primitive depth-lacking stories, and a main actor/team who acted like grunting animals half the time with their primitive philosophies. Impossible to take seriously. The only one I liked, was Spock, with his silly concept of pure logic as an ideal. ;)

      Sorry, I am not saying this to hurt or insult anyone. I'm just expressing how it felt to me and others I know.

      TNG on the other hand was nearly *wise*. Picard could have been the father/uncle you never had. A real leader. As opposed to Kirk.
      Of course the aliens still were the complete jokes of having something glued to their faces most of the time. And they still lived in a totalitarian horror scenario world controlled by millitary. But at least they were scientists most of the time. And the stories were a big improvement. Sure, some characters were rather bad (Crusher, Yar, Pulaski, Lwaxana Troi), but the main Charakters were very great. But most of all I liked the episodes that really went beyond everything. And not those with some silly copy of a roman empire, the 50s or the like (those were horrible).

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    28. Re:chests? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed most that TNG was like a box of chocolates...

      When watching a new episode, everything was possible. Comedy, crimestory, sometimes even science fiction :-)

      --
      bickerdyke
  4. As in by Huzzah! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pardon me sir, I believe your fly is ringing.

    1. Re:As in by Huzzah! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or even, lends new meaning to the phrase, "Would you PLEASE hang up your jacket?"

    2. Re:As in by TimGJ · · Score: 1

      Pardon me sir, I believe your fly is ringing.

      No. I'm just pleased to see you...

    3. Re:As in by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      So that's how Chuck Berry came up with My Ding-a-Ling.

    4. Re:As in by Telecommando · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's why I always keep my fly on vibrate.

      Woo-Hoo! I'm getting a call!

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    5. Re:As in by electricprof · · Score: 1

      But this brings up the next important decision... boxers or briefs? Thong? How much fabric is needed for a long distance call?

    6. Re:As in by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I'm feeling a burning sensation. Has anyone seen my Faraday Underwear.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  5. Awesome by rossi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make it sew....

    --
    I want to meet the guy who invented beer and see whats he's up to now.
    1. Re:Awesome by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      How long have you been waiting to use that?

      The first run was September 1987, so that joke could be over 20 years old.

      N.B. I looked it up on Wikipedia.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Awesome by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      Make it sew....

      Seriously, that is the name of a business in my town:
      http://makeitsew.biz/misabout.html
      It is run by a couple ex-musicians who are also Star Trek fans.

    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. Keeps happening by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every now and then a 'designer' unveils a jacket or whatever with some kind of technology built into it (for the past ten years at least), and says that its 'new' and 'amazing' or whatever, and that its going to change the world.
    IT WON'T. People DON'T WANT that stuff built-in to their clothing. It's uneconomic to build that stuff in to clothing. Not only do you have to manufacture the device(s) in question; you have to build them in to garments of differing styles, colours, sizes etc etc, and that utterly destroys any economies of scale.
    Anyway, what happens when you need to wash this jacket? What about if you want to use the tech on a warm day? What if you want to wear a different jacket that day?

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:Keeps happening by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd say its uses would be more in line with the emergency services, and the device would either be washable, or removable.

      --
      Anonymous Coward
    2. Re:Keeps happening by Threni · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is a breakthrough though, because for once it's not MIT!!

      You're completely right, though - it's up there with that Captain Android professor twat who likes to get chips inserted just under his skin and pretend he's the first of a new species of android.

    3. Re:Keeps happening by Deviant · · Score: 1

      Unless you are in the military - where you always wear the same color/outfit, weight and how much you carry needs to be kept at a minimum as well as there being a great need to commicate and for others to know where you are. This actually goes along with the Star Trek analogy a bit too because they were, arguably, military personnel.

      But there is no money in selling things to the miltary right?

    4. Re:Keeps happening by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I have long thought that a mobile phone could be built into a hat. It could have a drop down heads up display. You could type by looking at the numbers on the screen. It could have two antennas which extend on either side of the head...

      And you could answer the phone by slapping your hat on.

    5. Re:Keeps happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how well this compares to walkie talkies. If they're not better, lighter, or cheaper, there's no reason to buy this tech.

    6. Re:Keeps happening by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if you are inside and there are ladies present?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:Keeps happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Poster thinks a silly cap with antennae sticking out of it is high fashion. There won't be ladies present.

    8. Re:Keeps happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the weapon systems manufacturer, Patria, would focus to civilian market?

      Someone actually thought that you could buy one?

    9. Re:Keeps happening by admiralex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as a point of clarification -- not that this poster is inferring anything wrong -- but the TNG communicators were not part of the uniforms, they were attached to the shirt like a broach. If you didn't want to be contacted/tracked, you took the communicator pin off and you couldn't be tracked by that method. Of course that didn't stop ship's sensors from finding you whenever they wanted to, but it's not as if they were implanted.

    10. Re:Keeps happening by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every now and then a 'designer' unveils a jacket or whatever with some kind of technology built into it (for the past ten years at least), and says that its 'new' and 'amazing' or whatever, and that its going to change the world.

      IT WON'T. People DON'T WANT that stuff built-in to their clothing. It's uneconomic to build that stuff in to clothing.

      Patria is a defence and aerospace-company. So you wont be seeing this technology on some average jeans, but you might see it in military flight-vests, uniforms and the like.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    11. Re:Keeps happening by DoctorFuji · · Score: 1

      Just as long its not a red shirt, which means you won't be around too long.

  7. So its a phone then? by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've got this amazing thing that is just like something out of Star-Trek, you put it on your ear and it enables you to make and receive calls. I can even TELL IT WHO I WANT TO CALL and it automatically connects me with them.

    Oh wait its a Bluetooth headset and a Nokia 6310i

    2001 called they want the future back.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:So its a phone then? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The summary is stupid. We've had Star Trek type communicators, as you point out, since the nineties. This thing isn't anything like a Star Trek communicator because those didn't talk to satellites, they were direct device-to-device.

  8. picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article shows a poorly sketched picture - the type you'd do on MS Word Art when you were 12.

    Going to the website, a proto example of is here

    1. Re:picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait it's made of cloth? AFAIK Star Trek TNG had little metallic communicators, much better looking.

      Anyhow, I'll just wait for some kind of holographic screen and have them build everything into my watch, even the kitchen sink.

    2. Re:picture by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      They did. Their communicators were pin-on badges, as demonstrated by the way they removed them in some episodes. We can make those now, for goodness' sake.

    3. Re:picture by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      A... a Brillo pad?

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
    4. Re:picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so fast... The real communicators had integrated universal translators and used subspace for FTL instantaneous communications.

    5. Re:picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was 12, we didn't have fancy-schmancy "MS Word", no sir. When I was 12, if we wanted to sketch a picture the right way, we had to go climb a rocky mountain during a thunderstorm, wait for eons to hear instructions from god, and then chisel out the rock with our bare hands and blood.

      I knew it'd come down to "MS Word Art" when those good for nothing young 'uns started "painting" caves with animal blood and calling it "art."

      Snort.

  9. Flawed Technology by cjfs · · Score: 1

    If it's built right into the clothing, how will you attach it to other objects to get a transporter lock? Rip the sleeve right off? Also, the objectives page doesn't even include a status update on the Heisenberg compensators.

    Amateurs.

  10. Antenna, really by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

    If I'm reading TFA correctly this is more of an antenna an less of a full communication device. But very interesting none the less.

    It would very nice to have a jacket that your phone could plug into for extended range, for example.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Antenna, really by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      The retractable phone cords from tradeshows would easily serve that purpose if cell phones were more amenable to attaching and powering external antennae.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  11. Star Trek practicality by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    If hitting your chest and suddenly talking to whoever you wanted to was practical then cell phones would have done it a long time ago. This has nothing to do with Star Trek. They want to find a way to make satellite phones sexy. Plus the communicator wasn't woven into the fabric. The show has communicators working when detached from the clothing.

  12. I don't care... by stms · · Score: 0

    Call me when they invent trans-warp beaming.

    1. Re:I don't care... by wjsteele · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I'd like them to call me when someone invents either part of it! Trans-warp or Beaming technology would both be very cool.

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    2. Re:I don't care... by stms · · Score: 0

      Really? Beaming is seems unimpressive to me unless one of the two objects is going faster than the speed of light.

    3. Re:I don't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beaming is easy. It's just an reapplication of food replicator technology. More powerful and finer controls granted. But nothing special. Just a logical next step.

  13. What's the point of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a communications device I have no idea what the point of this is. Phones work and have far more useful functions like, I dunno, being something other than two way radios.

    Secondly, I'm pretty sure the communicators on their chests weren't fabric. They were more along the lines of buttons.

    Finally, I can see this being useful for other things due to the fact it shows some interesting miniaturization. Like a hat that doubles as headphones or...I can't think of anything else but there must be some use for it.

    1. Re:What's the point of this by polar+red · · Score: 1

      they mentionned gold and I believe white gold (platinum) at least once.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:What's the point of this by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      White gold and platinum are two very different things. Platinum is a completely different element, where as white gold is just normal gold with other elements "polluting" it (the same as red gold). Not that I have any idea what any of that has to do with the original topic or the parent comment!

  14. Patria is mostly in military gears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should you check the 'finnish company site', its mostly in weapons systems and similar, so the aspect on how cool this would be in your underwear i think is not the design criteria, rather on keeping troops on 'radar'.

  15. Wearing an antenna??? by Ptur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    EEEK... I wouldn't want to wear a transmitting antenna *on* my body with the antenna being on the exact same spot the whole time... Sound like this hasn't been thought out very well.

    1. Re:Wearing an antenna??? by cheros · · Score: 1

      So, where exactly do you wear your mobile phone? Does that location change?

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    2. Re:Wearing an antenna??? by Ptur · · Score: 1

      Actually, I try not to use a mobile phone, and certainly not wear it on me. In any case, the mobile would still be at least 2-3cm away from the body, but when it is in the tissue, we're talking 1cm and less...

    3. Re:Wearing an antenna??? by cheros · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you're one of the more sensible people.

      On the plus side, the least sensible place to carry a phone happens to also filter out that habit in the future in a sort of Darwinistic fashion (if we indeed have a radiation problem): trouser pocket..

      On that topic, my problem is that pagers do not work internationally, otherwise I would not expect an iPhone to be delivered tomorrow.. :-)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    4. Re:Wearing an antenna??? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Given that my mobile phone is normally off, it doesn't matter where I wear it. I only switch it on when I use it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  16. Just a prediction by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I doubt very much whether this device will take off in a big way until they develop a transporter to get you out of your lover's apartment before your spouse's camera crews arrive.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  17. It's military equipment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Patria is a company working on defence and aerospace sectors. That should explain why the technology should not rely on mobile networks and why the "wearer" may want to have his/her position known by others.

  18. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, human lightening rod....

  19. (over)heating? by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    If using the GPS for long periods can have your phone warm up significantly, (was it the iPhone?) then perhaps the antennas should be set in one's gloves, to keep your hands warm*, especially during the winter days.

    In any case, having to keep a certain distance from the body (for safety reasons) pretty much keeps this sort of thing on outerwear only.

    * That's right, I'm Canadian.

  20. Alternative to clothing by DoctorFuji · · Score: 1

    Actually I would prefer the Dick Tracy concept of a combination wrist watch and communicator

    1. Re:Alternative to clothing by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe some future generation will be genetically engineered to grow an antenna in their skin. Of course with direct link to the speech centers in the brain, to directly communicate through it without actually speaking.

      Well, at least it would be a nice idea for a Science Fiction story.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  21. Incorrect by PolarIced · · Score: 2, Informative

    The crew of "Star Trek: The Next Generation" used the insignias you could tap on as communicators. The original Star Trek series had flip-open handheld devices which they wore on their belts.

    Sheesh! What is Slashdot coming to these days?

  22. Did anyone else... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

    ...see the title of this article in their RSS feed and think, "Oh no, some jackass integrated wireless internet into sunglasses and chose Netscape Communicator as the browser!" ???

    --
    @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  23. Electromagnetic Radiation by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else wondering if your underwear will be lead shielded? Seems like the craze these days is all about cell phone radiation. What are they doing to do when the very close you wear are cell capable? ;)

    1. Re:Electromagnetic Radiation by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else wondering if your underwear will be lead shielded?

      I'm a little more worried about my underwear being off-hook sometime after I've consumed a burrito.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    2. Re:Electromagnetic Radiation by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The cell phone -- finally, birth control for men!

  24. An industry is potentially revived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dry clean only.

  25. Probably for pilots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patria is a Finnish arms manufacturer, so it's probably intended for military use.

  26. Re: Inconceivable. by jimwelch · · Score: 1

    You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means. ...
    Hello! My name is ... You ... my ...! Prepare to Die! (fill in the blanks to meet current situation).

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  27. do i dare ask? by in4mation · · Score: 1

    How do you charge this thingy?

  28. bugs / wires by madeye+the+younger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, we can finally abandon the ancient, hoary plot device of the movie bad guys ripping open somebody's shirt to reveal a 1970's Radio Shack bug microphone/transmitter taped to their chest? Since a bug can now be anywhere *inside* the shirt material itself (or pants for that matter), important Mafia business will now be conducted in the nude?

    1. Re:bugs / wires by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      important Mafia business will now be conducted in the nude?

      Thank you for that mental image; now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go put out my mind's eye.

  29. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COUNSELOR, you illiterate fuck!!

  30. oh yeah.. by mr_resident · · Score: 1

    ..vibrate mode...Vibrate Mode...OH YES! Call Me! Viiiibraate Moooode!! YES!!..YES!

  31. Ooo a new classic! by hrimhari · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I don't know any classic sci-fi show named "Starship Enterprise".

    Do you mean:
    - Star Trek (The Original Series, no communication devices on the uniform)
    - Enterprise (The most recent one, hardly a classic, still no communication devices on the uniform)
    - Star Trek (The Movie, but was there any communication devices on the uniform? I don't remember)
    or maybe...
    - STARSHIP TROOPERS!?

    --
    http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
  32. Vocera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not use a smaller version of the Vocera hospital communication device to actually be that touch communicator on STNG?

  33. Not sure.. by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

    Not sure if I want any satellite talking to my underwear!