Why do these robots have to be autonomous? How about instead, the robots get to do the back-breaking part of the job under the direct control of a seasoned farm hand? Sheesh, would controlling a robot to weed a garden be all that much different than Farmville?
Punitive damages? Good! I knew that you could. This isn't restitution, where the amount matches some arbitrary measure of costs incurred (harm done). This is to make the punishment so deliberately disproportional to the actual cost/benefit that others avoid the same offense because its such a bad business risk.
Most consumer grade dry toner is made of magnetite dust (filings gives the impression that the magnetite is much coarser than it actually is), and a carrier which is wax and/or resin. The reason most consumer grade toner has iron in it, is because that allows the stuff to be applied to the to the image drum by brushing 'waves' of it with a magnetic roller assembly.
Non-magnetic dry toner exists, but its more complicated and fussy to get it on the image cylinder. For example, the Midax print engines (Delphax technology based) I used to maintain could use either, but required a different toner delivery assembly. The 'nonmag' toner hopper delivered toner to the image cylinder by blowing air through a sintered metal plate to make the layer of toner above it behave as a fluid. If things weren't Just So (down to things we didn't control very well such as ambient air temperature and humidity, fumes from flexographic ink, etc) it would work poorly if at all. When it did work, we could run the paper web through the press at up to 400 feet per minute or so.
And I hope every day Brad McQuaid wakes up and someone IS kicking him repeatedly. Customer service, my ass. I've never played a Sony/Verant game since, and never will. Nor anything that dickhead is involved with.
... and I'll be avoiding anything tainted by Yves Guillemot and his four brothers, just as I've done for Smedley and Mcquaid after experiencing their inexcusable management of customer service with Everquest.
This may be a bit misleading for some. Vestas (Vestas and Siemens are the two largest wind power companies in Denmark) sells a lot of towers overseas - however it subcontracts the actual construction. It doesn't physically export thousands of tons of structural steel to the U.S.; it contracts with a company like mine to build them here. I personally have fabricated sections of Vestas towers, to their specs (as confirmed by their unforgiving inspectors).
So, when there's talk of Vestas 'exporting towers', yeah they sold them, its their design, but they don't necessarily PHYSICALLY export the towers.
Really? The towers that I personally fabricated 8 ton parts for don't count? Or is Wisconsin not considered part of the United States any more? We make the towers, we make the turbines, we erect them, we maintain them, and we service them. That's just the company I work for, and I assure you its not Chinese owned or operated.
Yeah, it is relative. I took the phrase at face value which seemed to emphasize the 'easily' and 'anywhere', making it sound like tower fabrication could spring up like Walmarts. As usual, the truth is somewhere in between.
My dayjob is running a steel plate roller at a wind turbine tower construction company. I speak from first hand experience when I say they are NOT 'easily made anywhere'. Even if that were so, the tower sections are most definately not easily transported anywhere. It is a helluva lot easier to transport the flat steel plate than the completed sections, as there are so many restrictions on oversized loads on roadways.
The contracts to supply towers go to the construction facilities near the project sites, precisely because the cost of transporting completed sections is so much higher than transporting the materials. The only competition from Chinese towers will be for sites located within spitting distance of a deep water port.
So, we can finally abandon the ancient, hoary plot device of the movie bad guys ripping open somebody's shirt to reveal a 1970's Radio Shack bug microphone/transmitter taped to their chest? Since a bug can now be anywhere *inside* the shirt material itself (or pants for that matter), important Mafia business will now be conducted in the nude?
I am of course about to speculate, but I do believe that there is no national standard for calibration paperwork, and its not too hard to imagine that some locales simply use a log book written by the nice officer.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, and you mean ADJUSTING the unit calibration rather than CHECKING calibration. That doesn't fit the context at all though.
If the nice officer had the gun in pop mode, you expect him to admit it? If the nice officer used a gun with expired calibration, you expect him not to 'fix' the paperwork? Social catch-22; the kind of cops that make those mistakes aren't inclined to admit them.
...you say that as if there were some implicit requirement of TFA to *have* answers to any questions. Silly wabbit!
data retention
on
Manhattan 1984
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Like many other information gathering systems, my concern is not for the primary legitimate uses. The fact that this data will in all probability be archived as an abstract summary/conclusion instead of the actual evidence means there will be no way to dispute mistakes. Much like when a police officer 'accidently' destroys notes so that his word becomes the primary evidence rather than the recorded observations made at the time. The consequence will be that anyone wishing to dispute a possible mistake will simply be confronted with "the system says your vehicle was there".
At that point, you better have footage from a television news team and a handwritten note from the Pope that he was riding shotgun with you on the other side of town. Anything less, and its your word against the government's expert witness. When this happens YEARS after the supposed incident(s) how are you going to come up with an armorclad alibi?
Store the *recordings themselves* or don't retain the data after it has been used for its DESIGNED purpose.
You would think so, but that doesn't seem to be the way it works these days eh? I can go along with "Your laws SHOULDN'T apply outside your borders"; in current practice that is unfortunately not true.
Presented for your amusement: the observation that each and every thing *has* minor details, which is what said pedant would be pedantic about - not the things themselves. To be pedantic about everything is, again, by definition being concerned explicitly only by the minor details themselves. We won't go into the murky and very non-objective waters of whose standards apply for defining what a minor detail is, neh?
- does a love of pedantics make one a pedantophile? -
Really? What about http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/SJG/ ? I'm sure Steve Jackson might have a word or two to share about armed law enforcement raiding a game company in the U.S.
Slashdot Mirror
for example:
http://www.howtogeek.com/57481/how-to-make-custom-silicone-ear-molds-for-your-in-ear-monitors/
no offline solo play, no sale. If it doesn't get cracked, there's other games to play.
Why do these robots have to be autonomous? How about instead, the robots get to do the back-breaking part of the job under the direct control of a seasoned farm hand? Sheesh, would controlling a robot to weed a garden be all that much different than Farmville?
Seconded. No single player offline, no sale. First opportunity I get to buy an offline version will get my money, legal or otherwise.
Your move, Blizzard.
Punitive damages? Good! I knew that you could. This isn't restitution, where the amount matches some arbitrary measure of costs incurred (harm done). This is to make the punishment so deliberately disproportional to the actual cost/benefit that others avoid the same offense because its such a bad business risk.
Most consumer grade dry toner is made of magnetite dust (filings gives the impression that the magnetite is much coarser than it actually is), and a carrier which is wax and/or resin. The reason most consumer grade toner has iron in it, is because that allows the stuff to be applied to the to the image drum by brushing 'waves' of it with a magnetic roller assembly.
Non-magnetic dry toner exists, but its more complicated and fussy to get it on the image cylinder. For example, the Midax print engines (Delphax technology based) I used to maintain could use either, but required a different toner delivery assembly. The 'nonmag' toner hopper delivered toner to the image cylinder by blowing air through a sintered metal plate to make the layer of toner above it behave as a fluid. If things weren't Just So (down to things we didn't control very well such as ambient air temperature and humidity, fumes from flexographic ink, etc) it would work poorly if at all. When it did work, we could run the paper web through the press at up to 400 feet per minute or so.
And I hope every day Brad McQuaid wakes up and someone IS kicking him repeatedly. Customer service, my ass. I've never played a Sony/Verant game since, and never will. Nor anything that dickhead is involved with.
... and I'll be avoiding anything tainted by Yves Guillemot and his four brothers, just as I've done for Smedley and Mcquaid after experiencing their inexcusable management of customer service with Everquest.
This may be a bit misleading for some. Vestas (Vestas and Siemens are the two largest wind power companies in Denmark) sells a lot of towers overseas - however it subcontracts the actual construction. It doesn't physically export thousands of tons of structural steel to the U.S.; it contracts with a company like mine to build them here. I personally have fabricated sections of Vestas towers, to their specs (as confirmed by their unforgiving inspectors).
So, when there's talk of Vestas 'exporting towers', yeah they sold them, its their design, but they don't necessarily PHYSICALLY export the towers.
Really? The towers that I personally fabricated 8 ton parts for don't count? Or is Wisconsin not considered part of the United States any more? We make the towers, we make the turbines, we erect them, we maintain them, and we service them. That's just the company I work for, and I assure you its not Chinese owned or operated.
Yeah, it is relative. I took the phrase at face value which seemed to emphasize the 'easily' and 'anywhere', making it sound like tower fabrication could spring up like Walmarts. As usual, the truth is somewhere in between.
No. We've built new plants in Abilene, Texas and Sioux Falls, South Dakota, but we aren't HQ'd in Texas.
My dayjob is running a steel plate roller at a wind turbine tower construction company. I speak from first hand experience when I say they are NOT 'easily made anywhere'. Even if that were so, the tower sections are most definately not easily transported anywhere. It is a helluva lot easier to transport the flat steel plate than the completed sections, as there are so many restrictions on oversized loads on roadways.
The contracts to supply towers go to the construction facilities near the project sites, precisely because the cost of transporting completed sections is so much higher than transporting the materials. The only competition from Chinese towers will be for sites located within spitting distance of a deep water port.
So, we can finally abandon the ancient, hoary plot device of the movie bad guys ripping open somebody's shirt to reveal a 1970's Radio Shack bug microphone/transmitter taped to their chest? Since a bug can now be anywhere *inside* the shirt material itself (or pants for that matter), important Mafia business will now be conducted in the nude?
Why the hell do we bother with jury trials when the damned Judge can simply throw out any verdict he/she/it doesn't like?
You say that as if it isn't happening now.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2006/06/13/deaths_at_guantanamo/
It take two people to use a tuning fork? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuning_fork#Radar_gun_calibration
Or does the nice officer even have to bother with that? http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/objectId/6245B0AB-9FC3-4F9B-81A1F43A63211870/104/308/214/QNA/
I am of course about to speculate, but I do believe that there is no national standard for calibration paperwork, and its not too hard to imagine that some locales simply use a log book written by the nice officer.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, and you mean ADJUSTING the unit calibration rather than CHECKING calibration. That doesn't fit the context at all though.
If the nice officer had the gun in pop mode, you expect him to admit it? If the nice officer used a gun with expired calibration, you expect him not to 'fix' the paperwork? Social catch-22; the kind of cops that make those mistakes aren't inclined to admit them.
I think, we don't. Fibber.
...you say that as if there were some implicit requirement of TFA to *have* answers to any questions. Silly wabbit!
Like many other information gathering systems, my concern is not for the primary legitimate uses. The fact that this data will in all probability be archived as an abstract summary/conclusion instead of the actual evidence means there will be no way to dispute mistakes. Much like when a police officer 'accidently' destroys notes so that his word becomes the primary evidence rather than the recorded observations made at the time. The consequence will be that anyone wishing to dispute a possible mistake will simply be confronted with "the system says your vehicle was there".
At that point, you better have footage from a television news team and a handwritten note from the Pope that he was riding shotgun with you on the other side of town. Anything less, and its your word against the government's expert witness. When this happens YEARS after the supposed incident(s) how are you going to come up with an armorclad alibi?
Store the *recordings themselves* or don't retain the data after it has been used for its DESIGNED purpose.
..."a Lucite cylinder cut from an orange juice bottle"...
PET I'd believe, but Lucite? Who the hell makes bottles out of Lucite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylic_glass
You would think so, but that doesn't seem to be the way it works these days eh? I can go along with "Your laws SHOULDN'T apply outside your borders"; in current practice that is unfortunately not true.
Presented for your amusement: the observation that each and every thing *has* minor details, which is what said pedant would be pedantic about - not the things themselves. To be pedantic about everything is, again, by definition being concerned explicitly only by the minor details themselves. We won't go into the murky and very non-objective waters of whose standards apply for defining what a minor detail is, neh?
- does a love of pedantics make one a pedantophile? -
Really? What about http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/SJG/ ? I'm sure Steve Jackson might have a word or two to share about armed law enforcement raiding a game company in the U.S.