Slashdot Mirror


Harvard's Robotic Bees Generate High-Tech Buzz

coondoggie writes "Harvard researchers recently got a $10 million grant to create a colony of flying robotic bees, or RoboBees, to (among other things) spur innovation in ultra-low-power computing and electronic 'smart' sensors; and refine coordination algorithms to manage multiple, independent machines. The 5-year, National Science Foundation-funded RoboBee project could lead to a better understanding of how to mimic artificially the unique collective behavior and intelligence of a bee colony; foster novel methods for designing and building an electronic surrogate nervous system able to sense and adapt to changing environments; and advance work on the construction of small-scale flying mechanical devices, according to the Harvard RoboBee Web site."

105 comments

  1. Missing an important benefit by Iamthecheese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They really should be trying to find something else: more reliable pollination. Yes real bees already do this but mass-produced robo-bees, besides being really cool, don't catch colony-dropping diseases.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Missing an important benefit by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      mass-produced robo-bees ... don't catch colony-dropping diseases

      Who says? The minute a viable robo-bee is created, I'm guessing someone will be thinking up a robo-bee virus. (In fact, a robo-bee virus actually sounds kinda cool!)

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:Missing an important benefit by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      exactly what I was thinking. Robot bees could guarantee 100% pollination rates or close. Not saying natural bees aren't good. Still Still I wonder if they will make mini flies for spying on people.

    3. Re:Missing an important benefit by camperslo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They really should be trying to find something else: more reliable pollination.

      Yes! Perhaps they can even make a variety good at pollinating cherimoya. Apparently South America has some bugs absent in the U.S., so most have to resort to hand-pollination with a small brush or something to get good yields from a cherimoya tree. The fruit is delightful.

    4. Re:Missing an important benefit by ciaohound · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then we'll all be installing RAV antivirus for BeOS.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    5. Re:Missing an important benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the robobees determine that you are a terrorist, they converge upon you and sting you. Then we have plausible deniability - they will just say "it musta been them Africanized bees; you know how they love to cause trouble".

    6. Re:Missing an important benefit by little_hate_machine · · Score: 1

      Would it not be easier to create a gen-eng plant that doesn't need to be pollinated. I mean, come on people... Pollination is so 20th century

    7. Re:Missing an important benefit by emjay88 · · Score: 1

      There is probably a reason that plants (or more specifically, their ancestor) gave up asexual reproduction a long time ago. From memory, the currently accepted reason was that it allowed for more variety in the gene pool and therefore could allow for more agile adaptation to changing environmental factors that are impacting an organism's survival.

      For plants that we're trying to domesticate (see: Artificial Selection), faster evolution is probably better.

      --
      1178161 is prime...
    8. Re:Missing an important benefit by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      01001001 00100000 01100001 01101101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00200001

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    9. Re:Missing an important benefit by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      LOL, one of the more creative responses I've received to my sig!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    10. Re:Missing an important benefit by shentino · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds like a viable idea for a cyber-terrorist, sadly.

      I wouldn't put it past al-qaeda to pull off something like that.

    11. Re:Missing an important benefit by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first thing they will need is better batteries (or some other power source/store)

      All that efficient low power electronics is nice and good. But if you're going to have a robot bee fly for more than say 15 minutes, you are going to need better batteries, or really tiny fuel cells, or a really strong wind/tornado ;).

      When you look at that scale we are so far behind. Bees (or even tiny fruit flies) can fly about, navigate, avoid threats, find food, gracefully deal with minor damage and not least of all they don't run out of power that quickly while doing all of that.

      As for mimicking colony behaviours and developing algorithms, there's no need to build robots for that. You can do it all in computers. If you haven't managed to simulate artificial bees well in computers, having a robot bee hardly helps.

      --
    12. Re:Missing an important benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably don't need to fly for more than 15 min. Especially if you can make them recharge (ie solar, kinetic vibrations and/or ambient RF power).

      You could also make the hive itself mobile.

    13. Re:Missing an important benefit by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      41 72 65 20 74 6f 6f

    14. Re:Missing an important benefit by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They really should be trying to find something else: more reliable pollination. Yes real bees already do this but mass-produced robo-bees, besides being really cool, don't catch colony-dropping diseases.

      You could pollinate with robotic ants, though, or just with some robot that trundles down the lanes sticking probes into flowers. Bees are good at it because bees and plants have co-evolved. Flowers attract bees, and [some] bees actually vibrate their wings at a frequency which stimulates pollen release. This is especially true of bumblebees who are often therefore used for greenhouse pollinators.

      The full mechanism for colony collapse disorder is still not known. The best indicator though is still the varroa mites which are a problem mostly because of the use of preformed foundation wax panels. These panels are installed into frames in order to cause the bees to produce wax cells of uniform size, and to reduce the amount of wax they must produce (which takes away from honey production.) Unfortunately, larger bees are more susceptible to invasion by mites! The best solution is to permit the bees to produce their own wax, which reduces honey production but which also reduces mite invasion. Then again, these mites may have only become this much of a problem due to global warming; average temps are rising and winters are often mitigated. Anecdotally, I'm seeing a lot of beetles and even birds which are definitely not native to this region, and seeing them proliferate in fact. Usually the winters wipe out certain species...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Missing an important benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make 'em run on sugar.

    16. Re:Missing an important benefit by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      V2hhdGV2ZXI=

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
  2. Can they sting? by spydabyte · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should have mimicked hornets instead of yellow jackets...

  3. What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everything you do at MIT is pointless.
    You don't actually do anything at Harvard.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between those two and Yale?

      I know it's for the law program, but you might find this amusing.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yale is in Connecticut?

    3. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Frak. Helps if I bother inserting the relevant link.

      I guess my Yale education is showing.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you do at MIT is pointless.
      You don't actually do anything at Harvard.

      Everything you type is just envy, It's tough that you weren't smart enough to make it at a place like MIT.

    5. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by melikamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is not altogether pointless. This new data could help to finally settle the question:

      To bee or not to bee?

    6. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by tsa · · Score: 1

      I think 'to pee or not to pee' is a more relevant question.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Any flying bee created at Harvard would come complete with a plan for incorporation, 100,0000,000 stock certificates for the initial IPO, and 12 lawyers aboard and thus would never be able to get off of the ground.

      The MIT bee would just work.

      (Seriously, Harvard ?? Far better CMU, MIT, Cal Poly, Stanford...but Harvard ? lollll...the skull in "Skull and Bones" is empty for a reason.)

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    8. Re:What's the difference between Harvard and MIT? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Egads...never comment on /. on the first cup of coffee. My apologies, Harvard. Was thinking Yale.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  4. Democratizing power of tech by religious+freak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've always thought it was interesting that we take the democratizing power of tech for granted. Certainly, those in Iran, China, or other places around the world may have access which, in pre-Internet days, would've been impossible. But I've always thought the democratizing power of tech would go into reverse with stuff like this article discusses. Imagine a true surveillance society, powered by those with the funds to create this kind of tech (i.e. governments). That could be the direction at least a few governments are headed in.

    I'm not saying that this will happen, but I just think most folks have not considered the very long term implications of technology. Over the long-term technology may not be democratizing at all.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Democratizing power of tech by anagama · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been thinking similar things, and although I would be loathe to go back to the days of having to head down to the library and look through cards to find a book that answers a question I can get an answer for from google in seconds, the search trail I leave says a lot about me. Anyone who actually played around with the AOL search data realizes this.

      My first thought when thinking about a network of tiny robots, was that someone in some government in this world will definitely turn this into a surveillance and data gathering tool. So while I love technology and the ease it brings to my life, I am also becoming more aware that my privacy is at much greater risk now than it was even as recently as the early/middle 90s. As technology becomes more pervasive, the ability to abuse it becomes more pervasive and I'm worried about that, in a non-Luddite fashion.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Democratizing power of tech by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, some geeky miscreant (perhaps even one from our own ranks) will open-source their design for a bee-killing EMP. We will then identify the colony flight paths, lay our ambushes, and watch the 'electrical disturbance' repair bills mount until the whole project is scrapped. Even if that one vector is somehow blocked, there must be plenty of ways to disrupt this kind of device.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
  5. BEEEEES! by Pherlin · · Score: 1

    Your firearms are useless against them!

    1. Re:BEEEEES! by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      My firearm is a flamethrower.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:BEEEEES! by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

      So your firearm is a...fire...arm?

  6. the Wicker Man flashbacks by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

    Now we can see Nicholas Cage yelling "Not the bees! AHHHHHHH They're ROBOTS!"

    1. Re:the Wicker Man flashbacks by atheistmonk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Killing them won't bring back your goddamn honey!

    2. Re:the Wicker Man flashbacks by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Now we can see Nicholas Cage yelling "Not the bees! AHHHHHHH They're ROBOTS!"

      Actually, I saw Daniel shouting "Reese, your father made you wrong!"

  7. NO by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    No. Just plain no.

    Paying people to create robotic hiveminds?

    That way lies madness. Terrible, stinging, robotic madness.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  8. I Know What We Could Do ... by HiggsBison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Um... um... teach them to spell! Robotic Spelling Bees! Woohoo!

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    1. Re:I Know What We Could Do ... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Um... um... teach them to spell! Robotic Spelling Bees! Woohoo!

      P.U.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:I Know What We Could Do ... by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 1

      No, no. Harvard.

      Purdue's got nothing to do with this project.

      (nor does Pimento University, Alma Mater to those paragons of scholarly manhood, the Dover Boys.)

    3. Re:I Know What We Could Do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P-l-u-t-o-n-i-u-m Plutonium

  9. robotic honeybees by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    Now we just need to get them to make honey and pollinate plants, before the real bee colonies all collapse...

    1. Re:robotic honeybees by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great...I can see it now. "Why does this tomato taste like....aluminum and carbon fiber?"

    2. Re:robotic honeybees by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Robotic bee spit ... now with flavor.

  10. Clever? by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    Harvard's Robotic Bees Generate High-tech Buzz

    said robotic bees also generate horribly obvious story title pun on /.

    1. Re:Clever? by mathx314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, insect puns really tick me off.

    2. Re:Clever? by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

      Does it sting?

    3. Re:Clever? by Crash24 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, insect puns really tick me off.

      That's like saying arachnid puns bug me.

    4. Re:Clever? by cheesecake23 · · Score: 1

      Buzzkill.

  11. This reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of a book called prey http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prey_%28novel%29

  12. $10 Million in this economy.. by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

    ... Thats got to sting!

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  13. As long as... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    As long as Keanu Reeves and a Large one eyed robot aren't involved.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  14. Good News Everyone by sexconker · · Score: 0

    Leela: "What's the mission?"

    Farnsworth: "Collecting honey. Ordinary honey."

    Leela: "That doesn't sound so dangerous."

    Farnsworth: "This is no ordinary honey! It's produced by vicious space^H robo bees. A single sting of their hideous neuro^H robotoxin can cause instant death!"

    1. Re:Good News Everyone by SBrach · · Score: 1

      They're the size of a Buick and twice as ugly.

  15. Looking into the future... by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the near future...
    "5 Million dollars worth of robo-bees were destroyed when a robotic "Pooh Bear" attempted to retrieve honey from the hive. The Pooh Bear lodged itself into the only high opening, preventing the colony from being able to return to their re-charging stations. Their charge depleted, they fell to the ground and shattered. A "r.a.b.b.i.t." is reportedly en-route to retrieve the pooh bear."

    1. Re:Looking into the future... by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, crud. I'm a Winni-the-Pooh geek. Alright, it won't be pretty, but let's just get this over with. I'll do my best on the snarky, elitist fanboi tone, but I can't guarantee the results.

      Sorry, n00b. Pooh Bear didn't get stuck in the hive when he was trying to get honey from the hive. First, the branch broke, then he used a balloon to disguise himself as a rain cloud. When none of that worked, and he concluded they were the wrong sorts of bees, went to Rabbit's house, invited himself to lunch, and gorged himself on honey. Then he got stuck in Rabbit's front entrance, and they had to wait for him to get thin again. When he finally budged, they all pulled on him until he popped out of the hole, launching him into the honey tree. That's when he plugged the bees' hole (and again gorged himself on their honey).

      [HANGS HEAD IN SHAME].

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:Looking into the future... by RendonWI · · Score: 1

      You know I am just going to assume you are 100% correct. Never heard of a Pooh geek before. Too bad you got modded funny, I would have gone with informative.

    3. Re:Looking into the future... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You know I am just going to assume you are 100% correct.

      He is. But he somehow misspelled "Winnie-the-Pooh".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  16. I am not afraid cause... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    He's protected from 3 inch bees, that's right.
    He's protected from 3 inch bees, tonight!
    A 3 inch bee can't sting this guy!
    A 3 inch bee shouldn't even try!
    He's protected from 3 inch bees, that's right!

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:I am not afraid cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eBee 2.0" will teach you some respect.

  17. Congratulations! by DougF · · Score: 1

    You've just matured. You may now leave the basement...

    --
    Impetuous! Homeric!
  18. Why Fight? by lorenlal · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new killer robotic bee overlords.

    1. Re:Why Fight? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
      I, for one, welcome our new killer robotic bee overlords.

      Hey, why not? We've had Microsoft's evangelism team infesting this place with the same goal for years.

      A few more pointless drones generating high-tech buzzes won't make a lot of difference.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  19. Shades of Michael Chricton's Prey. Fun.

    --
    The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    1. Re:Prey? by tsa · · Score: 1

      That was by far his worst book. What a load of nonsense.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  20. Next up... by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

    Boston dynamics teams up with Harvard to make a robot dog with robot bees in its mouth and when it barks it shoots bees at you.

  21. High-tech Buzz by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

    Is it bad that the first thing I thought of was marketing shills?

  22. Military applications? by RNLockwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This appears to have military applications, say a swarm of cheap cruise missiles that any country could afford. Other than that it is way cool.

    --
    Nate
    1. Re:Military applications? by marciot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much explosive power can you pack into a bee-sized missile? I doubt being able to set off firecrackers would qualify as military firepower.

    2. Re:Military applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bat would be more useful. In fact, go ahead and google "bat bomb". The allies had one during WW2 that they actually tested on wooden buildings, with surprisingly good results. Or perhaps not surprisingly, considering that wooden buildings have a tendency to burn to the ground if you leave a burning candle alone in a room for five minutes.

    3. Re:Military applications? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      How much explosive power can you pack into a bee-sized missile?

      How much venom does a coral snake bite deliver?

    4. Re:Military applications? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exploding bees? That doesn't seem very useful given the small payload capacity. A more practical military application would be in targeted chemical/biological warfare. A sentry hive placed outside a military outpost could sniff intruders for a chemical friend-or-foe signature and, if it's absent, they could attack. This could even be used as a non-lethal weapon if the robotic insects injected a paralytic agent rather than a toxin.

      The military applications are actually extremely interesting!

    5. Re:Military applications? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nah, they'd be easy to thwart via flying windshields.
         

    6. Re:Military applications? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Yea mean like ketamine-laced robot bees? That would be awesome.

      I can see it now... A high-security military installation is equipped with a hive of these sentry bees. News of the security mechanism spreads to a local college campus, and on Monday morning guards at the military installation find their perimeter lined with hundreds of catatonic k-holing college students.

    7. Re:Military applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surveillance is almost always the first military goal of these type of things. Then they add weapons later. Look no further than things like the Predator UAV, etc for examples. First it was a surveillance plane, now it carries Hellfires.

    8. Re:Military applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nuclear bees?

    9. Re:Military applications? by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      I would expect that the communications and organization software could be used in to good advantage in a swarm of cruise missiles that might be from 3 to 6 meters or more long.

      Of course if each "bee" has a quarter gram of HE a swarm might be able to deliver enough to do some precise damage, but that's not what I was thinking.

      --
      Nate
  23. Re:"Ultra" low power by mirix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They'll just start adding them together.
    UltraUltra low power
    UltraSuperMicroMini low power
    PicoPicoPicoPicoPower

    Or we could skip all that and do what ST does; Embellish a bit and call it "zeropower" (which is trademarked no less).

    Zeropower NVRAM - Which of course is battery backed, and uses... power.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  24. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Michael's Crichton Prey anyone?

  25. busy bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bee he is a busy soul,
    he has no time for birth control.
    And that is why in times like these,
    there are so many sons of bees.

  26. Prophetic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a given cynic but does it remind anyone else here of Michael Crichton's 'Prey' where a swarm of nano-robots develops enough intelligence to turn back on humans ....

  27. Bullshit by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    The 5-year, National Science Foundation-funded RoboBee project could lead to a better understanding of how to mimic artificially the unique collective behavior and intelligence of a bee colony;

    Technically true, but the same can be achieved with far cheaper computer simulations. In fact I suspect said simulation would be run *before* said behavior is implemented in the pricey flying robots.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  28. Where it will lead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The results of such experiments are described in 1964 novel The Invincible by StanisÅaw Lem. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invincible.

  29. Harvard? Frustrating name dropping. by mutualrecursion · · Score: 1

    The exact same project done at most universities would at best get a reference of "scientists do XYZ". Harvard does it (or MIT, even more) and not only it's more likely to get promoted, it also gets the headline "Harvard researchers do XYZ". Slashdot is for intelligent people (ok, mostly). We shouldn't be feeding the hype cycle.

  30. Robotic Bees or Half Bees? by Master+Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Half a bee, philosophically, Must, ipso facto, half not be. But half the bee has got to be Vis a vis, its entity. D'you see? But can a bee be said to be Or not to be an entire bee When half the bee is not a bee Due to some ancient injury?

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:Robotic Bees or Half Bees? by Thoughts+from+Englan · · Score: 1

      I hope you have a licence for that half a bee

      --
      That was supposed to be "Thoughts from England" ... Oh well.
  31. Electric Honey Dept by Phoghat · · Score: 1

    Back in the sixties I had a band called Electric Honey

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  32. A nice token to start by Mr_Blank · · Score: 1

    I doubt that $10 million is enough to get very far in reverse engineering biological bees, much less building a colony of robo-bees with features similar to bio-bees. Nature has spent millions of years on a massively parallel R&D project to create bees as we see them today. At MIT rates, $10 million should be just enough to get some professors by until they need more grant money, and maybe pad the resumes of some grad students. There will be no robo-bee overlords anytime soon.

  33. Grant? by codepunk · · Score: 1

    What a waste of money, if you want a swarm of mechanical bees place a bounty of 10 million on it and it will get done!

    --


    Got Code?
  34. Next up: robotic dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with robotic bees in its mouth so that when it robotically barks it shoots robotic bees at you.

  35. Umm...excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just one thing. What happens if a few of these robo-bees escape and are captured by (as we will now call them) bio-bees? What if the bio-bees dismantle the few escaped robo-bees and adapt the technology to suit themselves? I'll tell you what will happen! We will have an unstoppable force of nature on our hands! A collective of cyberneticly enhanced bees sending their drones out across the planet, destroying all who stand in their way, and assimilating all those brave bees who might resist! Disaster! Disaster I tell you!

    Science: all about could, not about should.

  36. Not one single Invader Zim reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are you people, and what have you done with the real Slashdot?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOq1ViF8oFk

  37. Spurring what? by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

    Anytime a grant is designed to 'spur innovation', that raises a red flag in my book. It isn't a grant to actually innovate, no, that would be too useful...instead it is a grant that is supposed to inspire others to innovate!

  38. Path to an Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm Robo Bee sounds like a predecessor to Borg colonies. What do you think, Jean Luc?

  39. More sleepless nights! by E33K+TH3+B34R · · Score: 1

    This is worse than my 'Terminator nightmares' ! ! . . . .I wasnt dead chuffed when I first heard about Africanised Bees n e way! .... Maybe we coud race them?

  40. Nanobees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard nanobees kick robobees asses.

  41. That Thou art Mindful of Him by l2718 · · Score: 1

    I think it's obligatory to reference Asimov in any story about robo-bees.

  42. B2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...giving new meaning to the phrase... Attack of the killer bees!!!!!!!!!!!

    Who needs Terminators when you can have a bunch of little robo-bees attack humans with neurotoxin stings.

  43. invader zim by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

    You're after my robot bee!

    --
    this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
  44. Re:Yeah? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Hey, I was forced by the meme gods... Please have some pitty on me!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  45. All hype until they can carry their own power by rclandrum · · Score: 1

    I've followed the development of these extremely small flyers for some time and it seems to me that the real technical issue is not the smarts and sensors that you need to build into them - after all, we can make custom circuits just about as small as we need to. The real issue with these flyers and even smaller nanoscale devices is a viable power source. Every video you have seen to date has run these things tethered to an external power source. It just won't be real until the bee (or nano device) can lift off the ground while carrying its own power supply, whatever that might be. Until then, it's all just marketing hype (not to take anything away from the incredible technical achievements so far).