Slashdot Mirror
Marge Simpson Poses For Playboy
caffiend666 writes "'Marge Simpson is posing for Playboy . The magazine is giving the star of The Simpsons the star treatment, complete with a data sheet, an interview and a 2-page centerfold. 'We knew that this would really appeal to the 20-something crowd,' said Playboy spokeswoman Theresa Hennessey. Playboy even convinced 7-Eleven to carry the magazine in its 1,200 corporate-owned stores, something the company has only done once before in more than 20 years." Worst issue ever!
Playboy has to jump the shark?
At the risk of being modded down furiously, I would like to express my opinion on this:
1) Cartoons are seldom sexy
2) The Simpsons jumped the shark years ago. Since then it has been repeatedly jumping the shark, again and again, once every day at least in the vain hope that somebody notices that it has jumped the shark. So far very few people have.
3) Cross-promoting press release opportunities like this bore me to tears. I can understand Slashdot covering this, but I have seen this "news" in 'serious' newspapers. FFS.
That is all.
This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
A lot of their issues have always contained some kind of explicit cartoon - this time they are just taking it to another degree.
Crackin' Wise - Blogging about whatever we want
This seems very unexpected. Not that Playboy would do it, or even that people would buy it, but rather than the owners of the Simpson's copyright (I presume Fox?) would agree to it.
"People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
I'm waiting for Leela and Amy.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Playboy is portable and doesn't require internet access or power. I predict that it's still quite popular with that crowd.
Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
You know? I thought the same thing back when Madonna showed up in a Playboy spread... then I saw the armpit hair. We're not talking just a little bit, either... there was enough in there to supply an entire Lilith Fair audience.
Sometimes, there are things in this world that you just do not want to see, curiosity be damned.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
It's even funnier though because this story is right above "FOSS Sexism Claims Met With Ire and Denial."
If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
They are trying to draw in a younger audience they their traditional readers (who are getting old). Personally, as a 20-something, I wouldn't be attracted to it as much as disturbed by it. That fact that BOTH Playboy and whoever currently owns the rights to the Simpsons thought it was a good idea is proof that they are BOTH in a lot of trouble. I have no motivation at all in seeing a "sexy" Marge Simpson. I think they confused "20-something" and "Anime Perverts." HUGE difference.
~ Mooga
I really wanted to spend my mod points here but was disappointed nobody pointed this out:
*ahem*
How many other Playboy models feature hideous bug-eyes, a monstrous overbite, chimp-like ears, and freakish bee-hive hair?
And to throw in my own opinion: Remember folks, the picture was drawn by someone who probably resembles comic-book guy! Yeah!
I just don't get why *this* issue is supposed to appeal to 20 somethings when the usual magazine full of naked women doesn't?
Because no one in their 20s BUYS pornography anymore.