Slashdot Mirror


Dashboard Reveals What Google Knows About You

CWmike writes "Ever wonder exactly what Google knows about you? Google took a step today to answer that question with the unveiling of Google Dashboard, which is designed to let users see and control the copious amounts of data that Google has stored in its servers about them. 'Over the past 11 years, Google has focused on building innovative products for our users. Today, with hundreds of millions of people using those products around the world, we are very aware of the trust that you have placed in us, and our responsibility to protect your privacy and data,' Google said in a blog post today. 'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.' Dashboard is set up so that users can control the personal settings in each Google product that they use. Google said the tool supports more than 20 products, including Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Web History, YouTube, Picasa, Talk, Reader, Alerts and Google Latitude. Consumer Watchdog said in a statement today that it applauds Google for giving users a single place to go to manage their data. But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data."

260 comments

  1. Dashboard reveals what they want to by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.

    Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the exact same reaction I had when I looked at the 'new' service. I already know what services I use from Google. What I really wanted to know is how much information they keep when I occasionally perform search using Google while being logged into Google or whether what info Google stores based on my ip address etc. but as you would imagine that information is no where to be found.

    2. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      Of course. In reality, Google probably knows everything about you already. Most people don't seem to mind, but it's still taboo for some reason for Google to come out and say it.

    3. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I really wanted to know is how much information they keep when I occasionally perform search using Google while being logged into Google

      In other words, you want to know if they're logging your porn searches ;-)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by pwilli · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Web History" is what you were looking for. It is available at the dashboard.

      It's the list of everything you searched through google when you were logged into your account, complete with dates. My backlog in there reached back to early 2007. Now I've deleted all entries and deactivated that "feature".

    5. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disabled it when it was first announced, but it is unreasonable to think that does anything but just make Google not show it to you. It is unreasonable to expect them to not keep those logs.

    6. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by pwilli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, Google is and always will be a black box like any other company when it comes to storage of such data.

      But by deleting and disabling it I at least make sure that nobody besides Google can access that information, even if they somehow find out my password.

    7. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by twostix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even so, just looking at what's there, all in one place there's only one word for it faaaaaark.

      It's like a time machine where I can look into my life for the last 3 and half years and see what my state of mind was at any point in time.

      Sometimes it was not pretty, things we forget over time ey?

      Also at what point did the search tracking automatically become opt-in? Last I heard it was only voluntary when did they sneak that change through?

    8. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Sam+Douglas · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, its real utility is seeing what is publicly accessible. I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.

    9. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by bennomatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      my understanding is that they anonymize any logs that are not to be kept associated with any particular account. I don't know all the details, but they are apparently thorough enough that it's caused some consternation with some courts who have tried to subpoena logs as evidence, only to find that they couldn't get anything useful.

      I don't have a link, but my recollection is that when their process was challenged (anonymizing after 30 days), they not only defended their right to do so, but also shortened the period to 15 days or some such.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    10. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And your ISP.. or anyone who has poisoned your DNS cache and is transparently proxying you.. or just about anyone who logs http-request traffic on the backbone.

      Oh, and anyone who has access to your web browser history/cache.. but you knew that.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by thePig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Web History is extremely important to google in many ways. So I do not think they will do anything wrong with it, since it would cause people to stop using cookies.

      As an example usage that I can think of, say, Suppose a person search for the text ’yyy’ in Google Search. Now, of the links he received, he reads the text associated with each link and clicks on 3 or 4 links to open in new tabs/windows. He gets the information he requires from the 3rd link, and so he closes the pages and is done with the search. Now, after a few days, he again requires the same information. He again types the text ’yyy’ in search, and now of all the links, there is a higher probability of the 3rd link being clicked first before the others, because it provided value to him earlier. The more times he searches, the higher the probability of the link being clicked. Now, by using this information, google can consider that the 3rd link in this case provided more value to the user than others. Since this is very powerful data, i.e. it is as good as user telling google that this link has given me more value than others, the page rank of that page can be increased based on this.

      There are so many other scenarios that I can think of - and these are very simple scenarios, with very less implementation issues (other than stopping people trying to game google), using web history. I dont think they will misuse web history in any way because of this.

      Note: I am not sure whether the method I mentioned here is used by google or not. It was just a mechanism I could think of.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    12. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Web History" is not available on MY dashboard. No mention of it at all, no listing of it being enabled or disabled. Nothing.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    13. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly... my record appears suspiciously clean. Almost ridiculously so in fact...

    14. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Zebedeu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably because it's not enabled in the first place.
      Try visiting http://www.google.com/history and see if the page suggests that you turn the service on.

    15. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      [CITATION NEEDED]

    16. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      LIES! All lies!

      Images searched: Jane Asher - carrie fisher fat - natalie portman bikini - natalie portman fat - Jane_March - woodgrain iPod - naked animals - whip antenna - ACLU 100 mile zone

      ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>>my Youtube account was sharing my name (username)

      Which one? The good news is that if you're over age 35, the advertisers ignore you. They are only interested in the young malleable people (seriously) who are easily-convinced to try new products. The rest of us are old and set in our ways, and therefore of little interest to advertisers.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    18. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      I love Web History. I've already used it to digg up pages I remember searching for and finding 2-3 years ago.

    19. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Web History is something you have to sign up for (it's a service you can enable on your account).

      The dashboard currently only seems to show you what it has in the web history service *if* you signed up for it.

      I too didn't see any history and had a wtf moment - then realised what was going on.

    20. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by maotx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not entirely accurate.

      Google anonymizes data that is older than nine months, unless said data is tied to a Google account.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    21. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by rotide · · Score: 1

      From that link after you log in:

      You should know: To include the web pages you visit in your web history, you need to install Toolbar with PageRank enabled. PageRank will send information about these pages to Google and associate it with your Google Account. See our Web History and Toolbar Privacy Policies. Learn more.

    22. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      This is the exact same reaction I had when I looked at the 'new' service. I already know what services I use from Google. What I really wanted to know is how much information they keep when I occasionally perform search using Google while being logged into Google or whether what info Google stores based on my ip address etc. but as you would imagine that information is no where to be found.

      Fortunately the first part I can answer affirmatively for myself: Since I don't log into Google and don't plan to ever do, they'll get zero information about me that way.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    23. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem unreasonable to enact a law which requires this type of stored data to be made anonymous unless specific consent is given by the user.

      Oh, wait, the UK government wants to keep more data, no less...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by clemdoc · · Score: 2, Informative
    25. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

      When I finally found the page that talked about web history, it said I needed to install the Google Toolbar. Yeah, no. I read the disclaimers about what they're allowed to do with the stuff it finds on my computer.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    26. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      There is also a big button to enable it without the google toolbar, but in that case it only tracks searches, not every page you browse.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    27. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Are you really 100% sure those entries are truly "deleted" and that "feature" is really, truly 100% "deactivated"?

      Or are you foolishly believing what a web page from the evilest company in the history of the world tells you?

    28. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by djrosen · · Score: 1

      I have web history and have never installed the toolbar or used pagerank

    29. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Oh, and anyone who has access to your web browser history/cache.. but you knew that.

      This is probably the only thing in your control. If you value your privacy, it'd be the first feature to go on disability of every web browser you install.

      But the truth is, most of us just aren't that interesting to be monitored 24/7. And if you suspect you are, you may want to take certain precautions instead of merely complaining about how some third party is logging your searches.

      (This wasn't directed at you per se, just "you" in general.)

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    30. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Maybe I'm just not paranoid enough.

    31. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by sootman · · Score: 1

      Wow, no shit. Somehow Latitude was on (which I *swear* I never enabled) and while it only had a (wrong?) location from a few months ago, it's not something I want on at all. EVERYONE should check out their dashboard.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    32. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by hannson · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we've all given Google specific consent through the TOS

    33. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      In other words, you want to know if they're logging your porn searches ;-)

      Well, I guess that might be kind of important. I mostly don't bother with any Google services that require any kind of login, so this product is unlikely to tell me anything I don't already know about my browsing habits. What would interest me more is the kind of information Google is keeping that can be tied to my IP address, whether I am logged into anything or not.

    34. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the information is usefull, but last time I looked at it, there is no notification sent to Google when a search result link is clicked. They could still keep statistics of cached results that obviously they do know if you click one.

    35. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      If you can't trust that they really delete the data then you shouldn't have provided the data in the first place. None is forced to use google, and much less forced to use it when logged on to same account that could be traced to your real ID.

    36. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Or just a little paranoia to assume they are hiding something.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't, pornhub logs your porn searchs, its not powered by google.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    38. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Troll

      The problem is, the paranoid people who care about the dashboard still haven't figure out that no one really gives a shit what they do on the Internet.

      They are still under the assumption that someone actually cares what they do.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    39. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yea, because we couldn't determine two of those three things of your username alone, real shocker.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    40. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Fareq · · Score: 1

      Here's the trouble. Even if there is no personally identifying info, just the raw data (your search history, your clicks, etc.) is enough generally to reconstruct the identity information. And not just because people often search for themselves "just to see"

      It takes some processing power, and it's not completely foolproof, but it can be done and has been done.

    41. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Fareq · · Score: 1

      From the Web History Privacy Policy FAQ:

      What happens when I pause the service, remove items, or delete the Web History service?

      You can choose to stop storing your web activity in Web History either temporarily or permanently, or remove items, as described in Web History Help. If you remove items, they will be removed from the service and will not be used to improve your search experience. As is common practice in the industry, Google also maintains a separate logs system for auditing purposes and to help us improve the quality of our services for users. For example, we use this information to audit our ads systems, understand which features are most popular to users, improve the quality of our search results, and help us combat vulnerabilities such as denial of service attacks.

    42. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the information is usefull, but last time I looked at it, there is no notification sent to Google when a search result link is clicked.

      I'm not sure that's true. When I hover the cursor over one of the links found by a search, it shows the true destination in the browser status bar. But, when I click it, I briefly see a very long Google URL appear in Firefox's status bar before the real site comes up.

    43. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Fareq · · Score: 1

      When you click links in google search it most definitely keeps a log of that fact. You can even see which results you clicked in your web searches on the web history dashboard thingy.

    44. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by jc42 · · Score: 1

      But by deleting and disabling it I at least make sure that nobody besides Google can access that information, even if they somehow find out my password.

      Or if they pay someone who works at google for a copy of the information.

      Or if they work for a government agency who has sent google a letter demanding a copy of the data under such-and-such federal law or regulation.

      Or if they're a private investigator who has paid a judge for a court order.

      Or if they just happen to have a good buddy at google who is willing to do a favor.

      Or if ....

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    45. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to argue that I shouldn't be afraid of giving my information to an advertising company because i don't worry that my employees at my ISP could be snooping my traffic?

      I know you are trying to make people who don't use google services into some sort of paranoid freaks, but it should be said that there is a big difference between trusting your ISP, who simply provides a connection, and trusting a giant american indexing and advertising company like google, who has all sorts of incentives to use your data for all sorts of profits.

      Lets go through the items and see what various entities really have access to:
      Browser history - People who reside in my house or break in.
      ISP - ISP employees, network engineers, which I would like to think are too busy to care about what one one millionth of their traffic is doing specifically.
      Backbone - so much noise, unless you are in the states or with AT&T I wouldnt worry.
      Poisoned DNS cache - well if they hacked into my home DNS server I would think i would have bigger problems to worry about.
      Google - Indexes and catalogues much data from many different services/sources, some which track what you are searching for (thinking, googling, search history), who your friends are (gmail), indeed where you are (lattitude), what kind of media you consume (youtube), pictures of you (picasa and flikr?(not sure if google owns them)), your phone conversations (google voicemail), frequent areas of the city you visit (google maps), any newsgroups you have ever contributed to (news), and much more. They then link all that information together under an account which may or may not contain your real name, phone number, email address, real address, etc.

      I wonder which of these entities most people would find the most omnipresent and scary. hmmm!

      At least for me, I am just a faceless IP address, which may be natted and also DHCPed. To worry about your ISP abusing your data, if you are not an american, pales in comparison to the amount of data and potential for abuse that google has. After all is said and done remember that google is an ADVERTISING company first and foremost! This runs directly contrary to their "do no evil" mantra. All advertising companies do is propaganda. Which i am sure you know, was started by psychologists and the nazis. Two very evil groups.

      So anyone who does not wish to be tracked by google, want all of their life indexed by an American company, is some sort of conspiracy nut who is crazy... right?

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    46. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Sam+Douglas · · Score: 1

      True, but I didn't realise Youtube was actually sharing that information publicly. When you signed up to a site years ago, who knows what information you entered and forgot about.
      On a (related) side note, this seems interesting:
      http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/04/identifying_peo.html

    47. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      I think this happens, though maybe only on a personal basis. There are a few sites I occasionally visit that have long and unmemorable URLs, but always turn up on the first page if I searched Google for a keyword. The more I searched for them on my home PC, the higher they went. But when I searched at another computer, they were lower down again. Back on the home PC not long after, they were higher. The thing was, I wasn't logged into Google every time - so maybe it's based on IP or cookie info. But there's definitely something like that happening.

    48. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.

      Neither did I, and I'm pretty protective of that information. (I don't even remember giving them that info)

      YouTube just went down for "maintenance"; I wonder if they're fixing that...

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    49. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I don't see Web History on my Dashboard page. Is "Web History" exclusively a byproduct of Google Toolbar?

    50. Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I was wrong, but that's what I was thinking of.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  2. How to prevent companies from collecting data... by t33jster · · Score: 5, Funny

    the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.

    1. I'm going to patent 'not using a company's products and services' in order to prevent them from collecting data.
    2. License my fantastic invention
    3. Profit!!

    --
    Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
  3. More like what Google THINKS it knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would say only about 5% of my Google searches are something that pertain to me. The rest are queries to answer questions others have asked, or nonsense searches triggered by external events - random words heard on the radio, items from junk mail my uncle sends, stuff from the newspaper.

    I clear my cache often, and often search for the equal and opposite of what I want to know about. Search for elder care, followed by kindergartens, then diabetes tests and discount candy bars.

    1. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And from that I can tell you are an old diabetic pedophile looking for children, but health conscious about what candy bars you give to them.

    2. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by oliphaunt · · Score: 1

      my kingdom for mod points- even though parent is AC it deserves to be a 5...

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    3. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by twostix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.

      Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!

    4. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well said. It's not what you have to hide! It's what they want to find!

      Add to that the Cardinal Richelieu way of thinking:
      "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."

      And you have a recipe for terror. Real terror. Not that TV "terror".

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by Dunkirk · · Score: 0

      Wow. Like the government needs Google to know any of this. Unless you were mis-modded (and should have been marked funny), I've got some news: The government not only knows every place you've been on the internet, they also know the content of all your email and chats. And don't think that SSL will fool them. Your only hope of obfuscating what you're doing on the internet is STRONG encryption. Rest assured that there's nothing interesting about my life from a law-enforcement perspective, but it still bothers me. Of all of my computer-savvy friends, I know maybe 2 that would be able to successfully communicate with me with public-key encryption.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    6. Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.

      Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!

      Same with Amazon.

      They could put together a pretty amazing profile of me, since I often buy books for others who either have interests different from mine or who are too squeamish about having their name and address associated with a particular order or who just don't trust putting their own credit card information online.

      So that makes me one who is interested in solo sex, Victorian lingerie, transsexuality and government-published information on how to identify a terrorist.

      This is coupled with my own real interests in sci-fi, electronics, computers, general science, oceanography and marine biology, the American prison system, civil rights, etc.

      As for chilling, I once was greeted with a logon message from Amazon reading, "Since you seem to have an interest in the dark side of the American dream, may we recommend the following:" Shit -- talk about amateur profiling! I'm sure an opposing lawyer would be tremendously interested in picking that bit up during discovery.

      My local library keeps a history of what I take out, "in case I want to find a particular book I once read". But they at least have a prominently-displayed option on my account page which is a checkoff for "Do not retain a history of my borrowed books."

  4. Let's add another hole. by pspahn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Headline reads:
    Starbucks wifi user identity stolen when rogue AP steals dashboard info.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    1. Re:Let's add another hole. by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

      Dashboard is just a collection of all account information at one place pretty much. If someone can crack into your dashboard, they can crack anywhere gmail, picasa and get anything anyway. Dashboard in that sense is not a security hole.

  5. Mottos by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slashdot: New for nerds, stuff that matters

    Google Dashboard: All your data are belong to us

    1. Re:Mottos by Sparx139 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somebody set up us the google bomb.

      --
      Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.
    2. Re:Mottos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    3. Re:Mottos by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      All your data are belong to us

      TFA says "In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data"

      So it looks like all somebody's data are belong to me.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Mottos by muckracer · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia government googles you!

    5. Re:Mottos by selven · · Score: 1

      At least it's not a Microsoft Bo(m)b.

  6. Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because it wasn't in the summary, https://www.google.com/dashboard/ is Google Dashboard.

    1. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bad, all they have about me is a Security Note. I was expecting worse.

    2. Re:Let's add a link. by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well that's annoying...one thing Google doesn't do intelligently is languages. I am logged into my account, they KNOW I speak English as a preferred language, but when I go to my iGoogle page on my iPhone whilst I'm in Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch.

      That was annoying enough...but now the dashboard is doing the same, even when I visit the page from my laptop.

      Google, you KNOW I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address. When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...

      *slaps the company on the nose with a rolled up newspaper* Bad Google, bad bad portal!

      -- Pete.

    3. Re:Let's add a link. by Nasarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know, this is total bullshit. I've been living in Germany for about 1.5 years now, I use an English-language browser, I've set everything I possibly can in Google to English, and it still constantly gives me random pages in German, like the OpenID login. What the fuck? Let me set my language in one place and then *keep it*, or recognize that if my user agent is in English, I probably want English. Overriding such things based on geography is astoundingly stupid, given the large number of travelers and expats in the world.

      Belgium must be a particularly strange example...do the Walloons get Dutch too?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Let's add a link. by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      Belgium must be a particularly strange example...do the Walloons get Dutch too?

      I have no idea what the Walloons get, but I actually live in Brussels, which is as multi-lingual as it gets, with both French and Dutch as official languages, but with a population that is statistically more likely to understand someone speaking English than any other language. And still Google thinks that Dutch (the minority language) is the best choice to use.

      -- Pete.

    5. Re:Let's add a link. by tknd · · Score: 1

      They seem to base it on your IP address. When I was in Japan it would come up in Japanese and it was pretty annoying. But now that I'm back in the U.S. and I want to learn Japanese it will default to English.

      Eventually I figured out that you can set your homepage to "Google in English" instead of the plain google.com.

      But sometimes though when you switch areas on Google it goes back to guessing your language from your IP and defaulting to something else again.

    6. Re:Let's add a link. by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can kind of excuse the crap job that Google has done with consolidating settings; lots of their apps were bought from other companies, and they're just starting to make the Google profile a significant thing. But what I absolutely do not get is why they (and pretty much every other website in the world) completely ignore the Accept-Language browser header, which is sent properly by every browser.

      It's such an obvious bit of information to use, it requires no IP-based geolocation, there must be some reason I'm not thinking of that they don't use it. Can anybody explain?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch. "

      No wonder, its because they have a common border with the bloody dutch...

    8. Re:Let's add a link. by spinach+and+eggs · · Score: 1

      And still Google thinks that Dutch (the minority language) is the best choice to use.

      Er... I believe it is actually the majority language. At least it was still when I left Belgium in 2005, but maybe you'd trust a web reference more.

      But yes, I wouldn't doubt if more people can speak French, simply because I believe more Flemish people learn French than Walloons learn Dutch.

    9. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm dutch, but I prefer my webpages in english too.
      Saves me the trouble of translating badly formed semi-dutch webpages, menuoptions and whatever to back english (=basically guessing what retarded automatic translator probably saw when he came up what THAT bullshit) , and then back to understandable dutch. If that last part is nessecary, because I can understand english webpages just fine, thank you very much.

      So yeah, I use a english OS, english browser, set every option to english (except I keep the metrical format, and the dutch date, time and number format). And when everything is set up, some 'smart' piece of shit program comes along and resets it all back. Same happens with automatic updates (also looking at you, firefox), it just installs the dutch update.

      Grrrrr.

    10. Re:Let's add a link. by spinach+and+eggs · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! Thank you. It's such a relief to know I'm not alone.

      As for the reason, I think there isn't a good one at all, but it's probably nothing more than ignorance (of the Accept-Language header) on the part of web developers. But that is just "what I think", with no supporting evidence whatsoever.

      But maybe someone actually knows the reason and is about to enlighten us.

    11. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least on my mac, changing various parts of the number/time format to Japanese causes lots of things to display in japanese. Some webpages, all QT apps, etc. I don't know of another OS that has an 'acceptable languages' list with reordering, and anything cross-platform thus ignores the one in OS X. That webpages do as well based on my time format is just baffling, however.. I suspect stupid javascript.

    12. Re:Let's add a link. by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain.

      I am in Czechia. I have set my browser to specifically take preference in English language version. I am getting czech version. I am furious.

      Google insists on using czech version of interface (seriously, I Want English Interface.) and returning localized local results. (I Want Global Results).

      I want google.com, not redirected to google.cz. I specifically typed .com url, how hard it is NOT to redirect?

      I want top result for ubuntu search to be 'original' www.ubuntu.com not sucky www.ubuntu.cz

      I want top results to point to *most* relevant (home) pages which are almost always in english, not some crappy half assed blog posts who got only to first result page because they are on .cz domain.

      sigh ...

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    13. Re:Let's add a link. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      This is a problem that was solved in the very early days of the web with the "Accept-Language" header, which is supported by all browsers since at least Netscape 2.0.

    14. Re:Let's add a link. by brentonboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait... we're mad at Google for not keeping track of some personal data on you (language) and using it? I thought we were mad at Google because they *do* do that.

    15. Re:Let's add a link. by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      Umm. Allow cookies from google. Go to Search Settings. Set your language preferences. They stick.

      That's how I haven't seen Finnish version of Google except when browser sometimes decides to delete all cookies.

    16. Re:Let's add a link. by LS · · Score: 1

      A lot of people use browsers a languages other than their own, for instance at work or at an internet cafe. Also, there are governmental restrictions; for instance, I think that google is required to pop up the chinese version of their site in China. Also, what if you first used a service in a browser of one language, but then switched browser languages? Should the setting be based on your first session, your settings, or based on your browser?

      I get your point, it's a solvable problem, but not as simple as it first appears.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    17. Re:Let's add a link. by weeeeed · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. Go to google.cz,
      2. klick on "Google.com in English" (http://www.google.com/ncr)
      3. ???
      4. Profit!!!1 (permanent cookie)

    18. Re:Let's add a link. by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      Should the setting be based on your first session, your settings, or based on your browser?

      I get your point, it's a solvable problem, but not as simple as it first appears.

      Determine the language based on the browser but allow the user to override and _make the user-defined settings permanent_.

      You still hit the problem of what to do when the user isn't logged in and doesn't have a session, but accept-languages should be your main clue, not geo-ip. Django's i18n gets the job done properly in this aspect.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    19. Re:Let's add a link. by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      Umm. Allow cookies from google. Go to Search Settings. Set your language preferences. They stick. That's how I haven't seen Finnish version of Google except when browser sometimes decides to delete all cookies.

      Sure it sticks for the search page, unless your go to it from an iPhone, and it doesn't stick for some of their other pages...like the dashboard. I have had it set for a long time, but it really isn't used sometimes.

      -- Pete.

    20. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, I can explain. Google has a deal with various "interested parties" to display different information to residents of different countries. Part of the total information awareness program is also total control over information, especially control over the information people in non-US countries have access to. That way terrorism and accompanying thought crimes can be prevented before they arise, making our world a safer place for you and your children.

    21. Re:Let's add a link. by DamonHD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because my stats suggest that most people leave it set to a default of en-US, ie US English, so when Accept-Language has that in it it mainly means 'I left it the way Microsoft set it' rather than 'I speak US English'.

      It makes providing any internationalisation frustrating, since the browser mechanism doesn't help much.

      Rgds

      Damon

      PS. Conversely, if your 'Accept-Language' is set to anything other than English it's a pretty hot clue...

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    22. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using http://google.com/ncr once (it sets a cookie) and see if it helps.

      The NCR stands for no country redirect.

    23. Re:Let's add a link. by Turiko · · Score: 1

      The Walloons make up around 40% of the population, the Flemish 60%. I'm part of the dutch group, and i often get a site pressed to me in french.

    24. Re:Let's add a link. by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps try a different locale then - en-uk or en-au?

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    25. Re:Let's add a link. by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. I use en-gb (not, not en-uk) for that reason.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    26. Re:Let's add a link. by darthflo · · Score: 1

      Where'd you get that? Most setups I've encountered were pretty damn accurate since MSIE pulls it's Accept-Lang from Windows' locale which is the same thing that'll tell Excel how to format your numbers and the calendar how to display dates (and recommend a time zone at the install). Even in the few places where an english (instead of local language) version of Windows is used, they tend to get the locale setting right. In alternative browsers, Opera pulls it's setting from the system at it's installation, then allowing change as desired; Chrome has a great config menu (populated from the system settings at installation, I'm guessing) and Firefox probably does something similar.

      Even in cases where english is requested from a non-english user, it's pretty likely at least part of his setup is actually set to english, so he's quite likely to understand it.

    27. Re:Let's add a link. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      The most ironical thing would be using Google Translate to translate the Google services to your native language while you're traveling.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    28. Re:Let's add a link. by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      I've so far 3 times resisted posting my latest stats but you're tempting me! B^>

      Actually, it's less bleak now than it was even a couple of years ago IIRC, and I do see the sum total of (say) es+fr+de getting close to en, but historically 'en' from the browser has been extremely unreliable and uninformative, so G may simply be playing cautious.

      I also note that I have nearly as many people explicitly requesting 'es' on my Web interface as have set their Accept-Language header, which suggests to me that a lot of Spanish speakers either don't know how to set their browser or think my i18n sucks and are trying to notch it up!

      I do agree with earlier comments that in general one should not override specific user locale requests with wild guesses based on IP, but in the case where no Accept-Language has been specified then I guess for some countries where i can or resort to a suitable one for the country in my mirror server's name, so my Australian mirror has a slight Aussie accent if you have no Accept-Language and come from somewhere that I can't make a good guess from the IP of.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    29. Re:Let's add a link. by hughperkins · · Score: 1

      It would be too easy. It's run by nerds like us remember? Would you do something the easy way if there was a clever way of doing it instead :-P

    30. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's a link, "Google.com in English" at the bottom of the Google.com page that brings up Google.com in English should you want your Google.com page in the English language and as such be able to use Google.com in English and therefore have English in your Google.com page.

    31. Re:Let's add a link. by bheer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google does appear to honor the Accept-Language header setting (which you can set in Firefox).

      For example, I just set my Firefox language setting to "German [de]", cleared my cookies and visited google.com. Lo and behold, Google.com in German. Interestingly, it didn't auto-redirect me to Google UK -- I'm in England right now -- although there's a link to Google UK at the bottom.

      If you change browser settings like this, be sure to clear your cookies first -- sometimes existing cookies contain prefs about which site you want to go to, clearing them lets you start from a clean slate.

    32. Re:Let's add a link. by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Small note of interest: Baidu is the default in most of China, and in the case of any and all hotels/motels that are available to foreign travelers, Mandarin Chinese is dropped in favor of English-US or English-UK (mainly in Hong Kong and Shanghai for the English-UK option as default), with Dutch, German, French and Russian options the most commonly available upon request at the front desk or your concierge.

      Not that I would actually log in to any websites, especially email or corporate VPNs over any lines provided in a Chinese hotel or motel. That's just crazy, and it assumes that you can even access them. I've found the restrictions normally applied are eased for foreign visitors somewhat, but only from the connections provided within the place you are staying.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    33. Re:Let's add a link. by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me started. It's ridiculous how even big multinationals (emphasis on multi and national) can't get such a simple thing right.

      Itunes on Windows is another good example. Originally it used Windows' "Location" setting, which is braindead, as location does not imply language. After much complaining about this on the Apple forums, they decided to fix it by having the user choose a language during installation. This is an improvement, but still idiotic, as they should have used Windows' "Language used in menus and dialogs" setting.

      What's worst though, is that despite setting the language in iTunes, every feature that uses the iTunes Store still uses geo-ip to determine the language! So even though I've explicitly told iTunes that I want to use English, I still get Dutch in various places!

    34. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's my experience that nobody understands multinational, or generally i18n.

      Even as late as 2004, I've had so called "fully supporting unicode" GTK2 apps fail by making crazy assumptions and generally handling Unicode incorrectly. How many people know the difference between Unicode, UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32? What about the Debian installer which, after you've selected the "US" language locale, proceed to ask which US timezone you are in? God forbid somebody outside the USA using American English.

      Damn.

    35. Re:Let's add a link. by insane_coder · · Score: 1

      I have that exact problem too, and I hate it.

      --
      You can be an insane coder too, read: Insane Coding
    36. Re:Let's add a link. by eldorel · · Score: 1

      Why not just use the localized language pages?

      English http://www.google.com/intl/en/
      Japanese http://www.google.co.jp/
      Chinese http://www.google.cn/
      Spanish http://www.google.es/
      German http://www.google.de/
      Swedish http://www.google.se/
      Bork http://www.google.com/intl/xx-bork/

      Note: If you happen to speak swedish, the the last one is a very perverted joke.

      You can easily find any other language that google offers simply by typing "google in $X" into any google search page.

      I've never been redirected to another page by these links, but YMMV.
      However, the default searches build into the browsers tend to redirect constantly, no matter what you language is set to.

      It was so bad I had to edit the search files on my system manually.

    37. Re:Let's add a link. by Malc · · Score: 1

      I found it amusing when I lived in China: all advertising (not just Google, but places like Facebook too) was in Chinese. I can't even begin to read that. I guess it doesn't cost much, but it is daft.

    38. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also in Czechia, and same problems. But when I do a search typing g [searched term] into the address bar in opera, I get global results, and language settings are ok.

    39. Re:Let's add a link. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You mean, they've identified you as security risk?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    40. Re:Let's add a link. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, at least the Google calculator still tells me that 2+2=4. So it's not all bad.
      (And those who don't understand this comment might want to read 1984)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    41. Re:Let's add a link. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but to be fair AC above is using Windows ME and IE6.

    42. Re:Let's add a link. by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      Too true, sadly. To be fair, most programming languages make this much harder than it should be. Even in a relatively modern language like java, which by default uses unicode for strings, you have a "char" datatype that can't actually completely represent all unicode characters. As a result, you have all kinds of libraries that assume that one char = one character, while this is not true. But you'll never find out until you have people using your application with, say, Han characters outside the BMP.

      And I shudder to think how few applications can probably handle different writing directions, like the right-to-left of Hebrew.

    43. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belgium must be a particularly strange example...do the Walloons get Dutch too?

      I don't know about that, but the Flanders get redirected to googledittilydittily.com

    44. Re:Let's add a link. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Quite often, the Accept-Language header is NOT set to the language the user actually prefers. Users could change it, but this would require knowing how to use a computer. Users who are perfectly comfortable with whatever bizarre interface any random web site chooses to implement will balk at touching anything on their computer beyond the bare minimum required to get to the Web. This includes browser preferences, OS preferences, bundled applications, etc.

      Because most web sites ignore the setting, users don't expect that the setting will have any effect, so when it does, they're confused and annoyed and don't know how to fix it if it's wrong. This puts pressure on other sites to continue ignoring it.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    45. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ?hl=en is your friend

    46. Re:Let's add a link. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem in Switzerland but it is even more confused since I live in Geneva (francophone part of Switzerland) but Google insists on giving me pages in German even though I have every preference I can find set to English. If I set Google Docs to Switzerland location, I get everything in German. They can't deal with a country that has more than one language or with people who have a different native language.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    47. Re:Let's add a link. by j-cloth · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. I use en-gb (not, not en-uk) for that reason.

      Rgds

      Damon

      en-GB has the added benefit of knowing how to spell colour...

    48. Re:Let's add a link. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Google, you KNOW I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address. When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...

      Yeah, that drives me nuts, too.

      I try to override the damn feature by going to http://www.google.co.uk/, but even that gets overriden half the time.

    49. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do use use the Accept-Language header. Change the setting and reload http://www.google.com to test it.

    50. Re:Let's add a link. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Because your openid login oage is not a google page, and they don't know your google prefs? Do you even know how OpenID works?

      They'll give you dutch results as well because they are probably more relevant to English speakers in those areas.

      I'm sorry you weren't aware of it, but 'Google' is not 'The Internet' and when you get bounced to another site, you get what that site offers, and not what your Google settings are. Unless you want Google to openly share your settings with everyone ... which I'm sure you'd raise holy hell over as well.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    51. Re:Let's add a link. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Which google is more than happy to honor. I use it all the time to get a good smattering of text in alternate languages and layouts to test Unicode compliance and functionality in software I work on.

      Search for something common, but with your language preference set to some RTL language and you'll get some nice real world example text to play with, useful before you've made it to the point of writing up your unit tests.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    52. Re:Let's add a link. by physburn · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the Link, Google doesn't really store that much about you, the dashboard knows my you tube and blogger accouts, doesn't now my other google account for adsense, and since I never activate web history, doesn't rembember what i've searched for or what web pages i've visited. It does now all my email though, so if you privacy would be better served by using other services for that, but Gmail is just to good not to use. My web browser looks private from the dashboard, I wonder though if it really is.

      ---

      Privacy vs Surveillance Feed @ Feed Distiller

    53. Re:Let's add a link. by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      That happens to me when I'm in Iraq or Qatar. The google homepage is displayed in arabic and the search results are in arabic, even when my query is in english (on an english keyboard). Changing the language settings was nearly impossible because, if I am remembering this correctly, the localization settings were in arabic without the usual flags to show which setting would be english, which was german, etc. I can discern many foreign spellings of 'english', but spell it in a different alphabet (arabic) and I'm lost.

      Other little things are frustrating- for example, going to www.wunderground.com from iraq will change all your weather data to metric. I know that's not google's fault, but it's an example of ip/location assumptions gone haywire. I wish there was a setting in the browser's pref pane that could tell websites what language/default location you wanted.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    54. Re:Let's add a link. by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to myself-

      I went and looked up google.qa and it looks like there are now links to english google. Search results, although they are aligned on the right side of the page, appear to be mostly in english now. I wonder if this has anything to do with me being in minnesota right now.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    55. Re:Let's add a link. by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      I'm in Michigan, but every few visits to Google from my phone ends up in Spanish. Couldn't I at least get French? And what the hell is my carrier (Sprint) doing with their routers to make Google think I'm in Mexico, or worse, across the Atlantic in Spain?

    56. Re:Let's add a link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dutch is the majority language in Belgium, but not in Brussels.

  7. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by Slow+Smurf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about Google ads(or any other tracking mechanism), or when Google buys a company that you used to use instead of Google?

    It's not as simple as not using their products, unfortunately.

  8. This might help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you forgot something...like maybe a link to Google Dashboard?

    https://www.google.com/dashboard/

  9. Bosses around the world say 'Thank You' by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now there's an easy tool provided by Google to identify what employees are doing with Google-related products while on the job. You didn't think anything you did on your work computer was your private information, did you?

    1. Re:Bosses around the world say 'Thank You' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to authenticate with your google account to see your data. Unless you give your boss your google password, he/she wont have access to your google dashboard.

  10. Great! One basket for all our eggs... by Wizard052 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Not to look down on the efforts made by Google to prevent attacks, but doesn't this pose a huge security risk? The payload from being able to hack into a users profile from this service would be huge...

    1. Re:Great! One basket for all our eggs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of the technical details pertaining to the answer to your question; your troll mod demonstrates one thing: Google apologia is the official /. religion.

    2. Re:Great! One basket for all our eggs... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly it's the ONLY basket available, that is desigend to let you take out the eggs again.

      All other freemailers I know about are information black holes. store your data there, but moving on the the next provider is a huge PITA.

      Google is the only companyI know who activly offers means for other sites to acces the stored data in a secure and reliable way. (APIs, OAuth, Data Liberation and so on)

      Sad but true, google would offer to distribute your eggs in more baskets you could carry alone, but the other basket makers are on strike.

      --
      bickerdyke
  11. WTF? by BodeNGE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's asking me to login. I don't have a login to Google "services". How do I see the info that Google has on my browsing history without logging in?

    1. Re:WTF? by merrickm · · Score: 1

      If you don't have an account, how would they have any info on your browsing history? Unless they were just tracking your computer by IP address, and why would they bother? It could easily change at anytime.

    2. Re:WTF? by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are these new-fangled things called 'cookies', which get sent to Google every time you view one of their ads, which are on roughly 99.99% of web pages these days unless you block access to those servers.

    3. Re:WTF? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cookies.

      Or less likely - detection of cached images or files.

      Youtube can give video suggestions based on what was watched using the browser even if an account is not created.

      --
    4. Re:WTF? by pwilli · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But it would be a even worse privacy nightmare to present someone all the data that has been collected associated to a specific cookie and/or IP address if it is not somehow verified, that the person trying to watch that information is actually the same that produced the data (e.g. the one who made the search queries).

      So even if cookie or IP-specific data is stored, showing it to you is a bad idea.

    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That info, such as it is, is here: http://www.google.com/ads/preferences Enjoy.

    6. Re:WTF? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      There used to also be a page that listed your actual search history as well. I don't know if the dashboard includes that info, because I opted out of this data collection at the time it was publicised, but it certainly seems to be missing this Google Ads demographic profiling.

    7. Re:WTF? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The history I was talking about is listed there...

      Web History: Disabled

      But the demographic profiling for AdWords is not, and clearly works without Web History being enabled. AdWords is not one of the 6 additional applications that are not working with the dashboard yet either, so it seems it has been forgotten about, whether accidentally or deliberately.

    8. Re:WTF? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > There are these new-fangled things called 'cookies', which get sent to Google > every time you view one of their ads...

      Why would I do that?

      > ...which are on roughly 99.99% of web pages these days unless you block
      > access to those servers.

      Blocked.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  12. Window dressing by rpp3po · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would have expected Slashdot to note the fact, that Google does not mention anywhere wether the presented data is even nearly complete. Without that it is just a sham, giving you the feeling of control, but possibly only touching the tip of the iceberg.

    1. Re:Window dressing by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Having seen what they say they have on me, two thoughts come to mind: Either they are being misleading and this is just the things they feel like telling me, or they are really incompetent because the stuff they say they know about me is pretty limited (and I'm a HEAVY Google user).

      Wonder which it is?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Window dressing by pwilli · · Score: 2, Informative

      Were you always logged into your account when you used Google? My web history contained almost everything I ever searched through Google for the last years. It only had "holes" for some weeks in between, when I e.g. started to use another computer to go online and didn't bother to check my E-Mails or do anything else that would need me to enter my credentials.

    3. Re:Window dressing by M3gaBight · · Score: 0

      What they have here isn't even a collection of data. It's just a tool to look over all of your preferences/settings.

    4. Re:Window dressing by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      At least it makes managing settings a bit easier.

    5. Re:Window dressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having seen what they say they have on me, two thoughts come to mind: Either they are being misleading and this is just the things they feel like telling me, or they are really incompetent because the stuff they say they know about me is pretty limited (and I'm a HEAVY Google user).

      I don't work at Google, but I've interned there several times, and people on SlashDot just don't have a clue when talking about Google's approach to privacy. There's well over 100 teams all doing their own separate stuff, largely unaware of what other people are doing. A few of them harvest a bunch of info from users but most don't bother, and almost nobody harvests data from one application and then passes it onto another application, unless it would be crazy not to. At least for now, Google doesn't track people anywhere near as close as Slashdotters think they do. Since they aren't interested in selling that data to other people and since they don't know how to monetize most kinds of personal data anyway, there's just way too little to gain for what is actually a pretty monumental undertaking.

      Google does what it does because it's run by ordinary people with a lot of ideas and a loose management structure. There is no conspiracy, and at least for now, people on SlashDot would be shocked by how little info about you they have readily available.

    6. Re:Window dressing by sydneyfong · · Score: 0, Troll

      Duh.

      The general atmosphere here on slashdot is to assume the worst that can happen, even if it goes against available evidence.

      I've always been amused by their presumption that *somebody* is interested in your data. Among the millions of people who has typed in that google search box, *somebody* wants to know the kinky porn stuff you're into. Never occurs to them that in fact nobody gives a damn.

      It's all down to egoism really. The I AM SO FUCKING IMPORTANT THAT THE WHOLE WORLD WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT ME.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:Window dressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't work at Google, but I've interned there several times, and people on SlashDot just don't have a clue when talking about Google's approach to privacy.

      You do realize that they can probably id Anonymous Cowards through third-party ad cookies, don't you?

    8. Re:Window dressing by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's pretty much right. The best gauge in these types of things is a company's past and behavior, and Google has never done anything to make me think they're going to randomly e-mail my porn search history to my boss or wife, or whatever it is people are so scared of.

      Companies everywhere have as much or more data about you than Google, and are less trustworthy. I can only guess that the OMGGOOGLEHASMAHDATA campaign is some sort of astroturf effort by a competitor.

      And I guess they have mod points too cause you got modded Troll for outing slashdot paranoia. :)

  13. Stop collecting personal data by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.

    Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services. Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Stop collecting personal data by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just curious, has anyone ever presented any evidence that Google uses collected user data for their ad services?

      I mean, you state it as if it was a fact.. it's not.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Stop collecting personal data by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      Do a search, then do another search on another browser with a different cookie. You get very different ads.

    3. Re:Stop collecting personal data by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Just curious, has anyone ever presented any evidence that Google uses collected user data for their ad services?

      I mean, you state it as if it was a fact.. it's not.

      Has anyone ever presented evidence that Google does not use collected user data for their ad services? Has anyone ever presented some other reason for Google to be collecting data?

      I suggest you remove your tinfoil hat. All it will do is focus the corporate and government mind waves and cause cranial injury.

    4. Re:Stop collecting personal data by houghi · · Score: 1

      Gazillions of users won't bother to turn things off, so to have a few geeks from /. do it is to show they play nice.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Stop collecting personal data by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever presented evidence that Google does not use collected user data for their ad services?

      Assume people are out to get you until proven otherwise eh.

      Has anyone ever presented some other reason for Google to be collecting data?

      Ya, that's the other thing, got any evidence that they *do* collect data?

      I suggest you remove your tinfoil hat. All it will do is focus the corporate and government mind waves and cause cranial injury.

      Yup, that's me, requesting that people present evidence before making wild accusations, very tin foil.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Stop collecting personal data by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Umm.. wouldn't just ad rotation do that?

      Is that all you've got?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Stop collecting personal data by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      wait wait wait wait wait

      Your post made it seem like you were a part of the tinfoil crowd by suggesting that they do not use collected user data for their ad services. But now it seems fairly clear that you are suggesting that they do not collect data of that sort at all. But that would be completely untrue because Google tells you and me and everybody that they DO collect data. Said data has been discussed time and time again in the news--on Slashdot, no less, and for you to suggest that they DON'T collect data would mean that you are extremely ignorant or naive or stupid... so which one is it?

    8. Re:Stop collecting personal data by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      you are extremely ignorant or naive or stupid... so which one is it?

      Umm.. I'm asking YOU to present some evidence that they do before just assuming that everything you read about in the gossip rags is true.

      If you actually bother to read the article, or check out Google Dashboard, you'll discover that the personal information *they* are talking about is the stuff that *you* give them, voluntarily.. it's not some data mined facts from searches, it's stuff like your birth date and location. Now, *presumably* they give that stuff to advertisers, but I happen to be an advertiser with Google and I've never been given the option to target ads based on that information... so why are you so certain that they use it for ad targeting? Do you know something the rest of us don't know or are you just assuming they do without evidence?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Stop collecting personal data by dvorakkeyboardrules · · Score: 1

      Just curious, has anyone ever presented any evidence that Google uses collected user data for their ad services?

      I mean, you state it as if it was a fact.. it's not.

      Here you go ... http://www.google.com/analytics/

    10. Re:Stop collecting personal data by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the whole point. Google provides what many feel is a fair trade, providing quality services in exchange for some of your personal data. Arguably, google having all this data is the first step to preventing your data being used as identification, because it's proof-positive that you are not the only one in charge of it. If you don't want google collecting your personal information, don't use google services. They do not have a monopoly over ANY of them.

      Even more on-topic: So far dashboard is nearly useless. All it does is link you to the google apps. But for example, you can't actually remove phone associations from google mobile sync, because that functionality would need to be in the app. It lets you know where you have data, but doesn't actually help you do anything with/about it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Stop collecting personal data by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services. Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?"

      Because not only do people believe they are entitled to benefits with no cost to them, they want others, including the government, to mandate it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    12. Re:Stop collecting personal data by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      I'd say you're ignorant, naive, and stupid, and there's no hope of you ever understanding what I'm trying to say, so I'm just gonna give up on this one.

    13. Re:Stop collecting personal data by Myopic · · Score: 1

      It's fine that you haven't had the evidence presented to you yet, but here it is. On your YouTube settings page for Privacy is this paragraph:

      We want to make advertising on YouTube as useful and interesting to you as possible. To do this, we sometimes choose ads based on search terms you enter or the topic of the video you're watching. For some pages, we also choose ads that we think will reflect your interests, based on the types of videos you like to watch and other site activity. To learn more or customize your advertising preferences, please go to the Ads Preferences Manager, or to opt out of interest-based advertising completely click here.

      That is pretty clear. I haven't looked around for other similar statements on other Google services.

      So, now that you have the evidence, you should retract the last phrase of your last sentence.

  14. You don't have to use Google by mmsimanga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one has to use google and when you chose to then you should be aware your data is going to be on their servers. Personally I do not enter personal information.

    1. Re:You don't have to use Google by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      It's remains somewhat worrying the impression that someone would get of me looking at my search history confined to when I'm logged in. It paints an... incomplete picture at best.

  15. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Either don't visit sites that use Google's ads, or block them. It's not rocket science.

  16. Control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interesting idea of "control". There is no way to determine this is more than just pushing buttons in a UI.
    There is neither transparency and an element of verification that the functions were indeed performed, nor is there an element of validation to demonstrate the effective execution of the user selected functions.

    1. Re:Control? by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea of "control". There is no way to determine this is more than just pushing buttons in a UI. There is neither transparency and an element of verification that the functions were indeed performed, nor is there an element of validation to demonstrate the effective execution of the user selected functions.

      And how, exactly, would you propose these missing elements?

    2. Re:Control? by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      And how, exactly, would you propose these missing elements?

      *cough* What I meant was, how would you propose to implement these missing elements?

      The comments on this story give me the distinct impression that no matter what Google does w.r.t. the personal data they have to store on their users, it won't be enough.

    3. Re:Control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't the best and brightest working for Google.
      So there's a problem. Compounded by Google's ambitions to store medical records through Google Health

      On a conceptual level, they'll have to separate controlling functions from data storage and applications such as Health, Gmail. Introducing such a layer after the fact appears daunting to say the least, but then, if they want to be serious about privacy, there's no way around it.

  17. Bleedingly obvious? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.

    Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY! If you don't want Google to know anything about you THEN DON'T USE GOOGLE!

      the consumer protection group needs to take a hike, it is the end users responsibility to manage their own privacy. A simple solution for preventing Google from collecting data on you is to prevent yourself from using any of Google's services!

      I mean, c'mon, the services are offered for FREE as a CONVENIENCE. Next they'll be mad that we don't get complementary foot-rubs along with our free email, SHEESH!

    2. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to hide IP or MAC without extra costs?

    3. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.

      Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?

      Just one.

      Do you really think people listen to reason when they're scared out of their minds about their porn searches?

      Maybe Mozilla is in collusion with Google and is secretly storing my cookies, man! I delete 'em but who knows, they might be there! I just don't fucking know! FUCK!

    4. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a/s/l?

    5. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?

      Just one. Why is it that opt-out is never good, except when people are talking about Google?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Virak · · Score: 1

      Yes, just one. Do you think Google has never heard of IP addresses?

    7. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Do they log IP address for their searches ? Wouldn't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid antiterrorist law ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    8. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, you could just use the Incognito mode in Google Chrome...

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    9. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Do you really think you are not recognized (and tracked) if you do not log in?

      You still reveal your IP address, probably user agent string and referrer information. I'm sure smart guys at Google have some others ways to identify user.

    10. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      How do you use Google without choosing to use Google?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    11. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Yeah... Do they log IP address for their searches ?

      I don't have the same IP number I had yesterday. There is no way to predict which one I will have tomorrow. My ISP is unlikely to be willing to share its logs with them as doing so could get them into serious legal trouble.

      > Wouldn't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid
      > antiterrorist law ?

      Not in the USA.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      ISP have to keep logs and will share them on a court injunction. Also, even if you logged-out before doing your search, if you were logged in with the same IP, they can do a pretty good guess. >> Wouldn't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid >> antiterrorist law ? > Not in the USA. Here in EU ISP says that international treaties with USA makes it mandatory for them to log IPs. I am a bit surprised.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    13. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ISP have to keep logs and will share them on a court injunction.

      You think that Google is going to get an injunction to force my ISP to give them their logs so that Google can track me for advertising purposes?

      > Here in EU ISP says that international treaties with USA makes it mandatory
      > for them to log IPs. I am a bit surprised.

      Google is not an ISP. Web site operators are not required to log IP numbers (or anything else).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    14. Re:Bleedingly obvious? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Uh huh, okay, wow you seem to have a strong opinion there.

      What if a person wants to use Google *AND* doesn't want them to know anything about the person? It's fine to want one or the other, and it's fine to want both.

      What if a person would prefer to live in a society with automatic privacy protections, instead of everyone having to constantly advocate for their own privacy? It's fine to prefer to do everything yourself the hard way, and it's also fine to prefer to have some general rules or laws to cover most of the needs, and make that all easier.

      We also don't have to choose either extreme, we can settle anywhere along the continuum if we want.

  18. I WANT them to collect my data! by Bifurcati · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Believe it or not, Google is a free service (for the most part) supported by advertising. I love the stuff that Google does, the way they handle advertising, and the way that advertising is actually (for the first time ever on the net) actually relevant. They've never done anything to earn my mistrust, far from it. So if by giving them my search histories I can improve both their overall advertising revenue and my own browsing experience, then I am more than willing to do so.

    If things ever go wrong, well, then I'll suffer the consequences. But people demanding Google stop collecting this information is just crazy talk. Yes, Google is fast becoming a necessity because of its sheer usefulness, but it's by no means crossed the line and doesn't look like it will. If you're really that worried - just don't use Gmail, Gcalendar or any of those other things. Your Google searches will still be reasonably anonymous!

    Honestly, it's rubbish like this that gives privacy advocates a bad name. Fight a battle worth fighting, for cryin' out loud.

    1. Re:I WANT them to collect my data! by zwei2stein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can love google and still be worried.

      Mostly because while they had no personal info leaks in past, it does not necessarily have to be so in future. You can trust google and appreciate that they use your personal info to make your web experience less painful, but you can not trust anyone who gets their dirty hands of their database...

      So yeah, real concern is in there. Especially that google becomes juicier and juicier target each day.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    2. Re:I WANT them to collect my data! by Bifurcati · · Score: 1
      Agreed - if Google were hacked, well, that's bad. But the same goes for anything I store on my personal computer. And while Google's a much more likely target than my lonely IP address, they're also a hundred times better equipped to come with those attacks than I am, despite my moderate geek status.

      The concern is there, but the difference is that I acknowledge and accept it. These guys are calling for the destruction of Google, which, to me, is a disproportionate response.

    3. Re:I WANT them to collect my data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the response is not disproportionate, you never get heard.

      That's why zealots run the world these days.

    4. Re:I WANT them to collect my data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they're after you, watch out while i make a tinfoil hat.

      It's another "what if" situation, and let me list a few, quite worse, situations.

      what if -
      * someone steals your computer with all your passwords and stuff saved on it
      * you kill someone with your car tomorrow
      * your house burns down
      * the world implodes
      * all conspiracy theories are true
      ect.

    5. Re:I WANT them to collect my data! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You can love google and still be worried.

      Yes, but most of us have more important things to worry about.

      Do you worry about what credit card companies do with your purchase history? I don't, but to me its certainly more valuable then my search history since my search history consists of searchs I do for others, random searchs for stuff I read somewhere else on the net, like slashdot, and of course the stuff I actually search for directly.

      My CC purchase history is pretty much exclusive to those in my family, heavily weight towards myself. FAR more useful information if you want to be paranoid.

      I just dont' have the time to be paranoid over what many people are already aware of. My mailman has more accurate knowledge of my activities than Google. The fact that they automate it and do it for millions of people doesn't scare me more, it scares me less, I'm one fish in the ocean, NO ONE cares about ME. No one cares about you either, you aren't special.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  19. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my gosh! Google has ALL my chats and email and calendar info that I uh posted there...right

  20. It's a trap !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or is it ironic that they make you create an account just to view what they claim they know about you?

    I block cookies and js from google, and I could swear it still manages to personalize search results. (by ip?)

  21. useful to learn of hackings by story645 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I learned that a youtube account was registered using my email address, and that I could access the account with my gmail account. So dashboard forced me to change my email address and try to navigate youtube's awful (non-existent) reporting pages. I finally got the right page by sending an email to the wrong people. Otherwise, dashboard showed the existence of things that clicking didn't show up, and the whole thing comes across as a gimmick to get people to sign up for the google services they're not already signed up for.

    --
    open source modern art: laser taggi
    1. Re:useful to learn of hackings by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

      So you changed your email address instead of just changing your youtube password on an account you probably forgot that you created? Yeah, Google is throwing a gimmick at you.

    2. Re:useful to learn of hackings by story645 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just changed my password. (I really need to proofread instead of going to another tab while waiting for the submit button to come up.) I know the account wasn't mine 'cause of the details associated with me, but now I'm realizing it was probably an accident at school: I forgot to log out of google while on some comp and some guy registered a youtube account not realizing I was still logged on.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    3. Re:useful to learn of hackings by G00F · · Score: 1

      And this is an example of one of the reason why collecting data is bad. The accuracy of collected data is questionable at best. People can easily be mis profiled.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  22. Re: Dashboard reveals what Reptoids want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.

    Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.

    Hmm.... reminds me a David Cross quote.

    "How can I be paranoid if the paranoid motherfuckers who are makin' me paranoid are really out there."

  23. delicious data by hyperion2010 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if you cooked up some algorithms you would have no trouble finding out so pretty darned interesting things about yourself, google doesnt give you those, it just gives you the raw data, which is pretty much useless by itself.

  24. How about a link to the dashboard? by seifried · · Score: 5, Informative

    3 links, not a single one to the actual dashboard.

    http://www.google.com/dashboard

    1. Re:How about a link to the dashboard? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1
    2. Re:How about a link to the dashboard? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      though its about a different article, but still PLS IMPLEMENT THIS - whenever possible, direct link to what the summary is about should be compulsory

    3. Re:How about a link to the dashboard? by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      how else will a random slashdotter get modded +5 Informative if they include the ACTUAL link in the summary?

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
  25. Missing data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the google analytics script put in the bottom on all the webpages combined with my ip? I forgot an url i visited yesterday, though google could tell me :-(

  26. Real or Illusion? by gooman · · Score: 1

    I just logged in and looked at it. It seems like a very nice feature. I found it amusing that you can "remove" information.
    Since none of my recent web searches are listed, the Dashboard appears to only keep track of your activity while you are logged in. Obvious, but still interesting.
    I imagine most searches can be identified by an IP address. Google must keep track of that too. Linking it together seem trivial.
    So the question remains: Is it real control or just the illusion of control? I guess only time will answer that question.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  27. Easy solution by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    "But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data."

    How about you don't use their services if you have a problem with their policy? Or don't give out (valid) personal details. How hard was that? One thing i do have to agree with is the automatic adding of contacts to my address book in GMail.

  28. Track me not by muffen · · Score: 1

    I've used TrackmeNot for a long time, and today I can see why that's been a great idea!

  29. everything by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    between googlemail, google calendar, google voice, igoogle, google lattitude, google talk and who knows what else, there is no getting around it. They know everything about me.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:everything by Myopic · · Score: 1

      If that's true, you're boring.

  30. The "Softly Softly" Google Social strategy by Phurge · · Score: 1

    If you haven't noticed, Google is building a social network strategy across its properties. Chat, Reader, Followers, Friends, Voice, Public Profiles, Blogger etc etc. All of these are just starting to link into one another. As opposed to to the download and spam your email address book model a la facebook, it has been a very quiet and light touch adoption path. This is just another step towards gaining user's trust and therefore adoption.

    --
    I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
  31. Solution by Teferison · · Score: 5, Informative

    Visit http://www.google.com/ncr (no country redirect) and google will no longer use your geolocation to determine what pages you want to see.
    Cookies required

    1. Re:Solution by 16384 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Visit http://www.google.com/ncr (no country redirect) and google will no longer use your geolocation to determine what pages you want to see.
      Cookies required

      (emphasis mine)
      Exactly.

    2. Re:Solution by Myopic · · Score: 1

      To switch a language, the website must read some information from your computer: a cookie, maybe a user agent string or some other browser-provided setting. What other method could it use? If you don't like cookies generally, you can allow this cookie (which is equivalent to a browser setting) and disallow all others.

    3. Re:Solution by 16384 · · Score: 1

      Well the whole point is that, without cookies if you type google.com in the address bar you should get the english version of google, but if you go to google.[countrycode] you'd get that localized version. What really happens is if you are in a country that has a local version of google you'll get redirected from google.com to the country's version unless you click "google in english" and accept a cookie.

  32. Freudian slip? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.'

    So I get to control other users' data? Yay. Does that make me part of Google? :P

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  33. It should be OPT IN by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Properly done, it's clear, that this should be opt-in at the creation of the account. And not only the option of making it public. But also the option of storing it on a computer you don't own in the first place.

    Everything else should be illegal and get you into PMITA prison.

    That model is already law for "please give my data to third parties" and "please send me spam" options in account creation forms in Germany. It should be law for all other data storage as well.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:It should be OPT IN by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Properly done, it's clear, that this should be opt-in at the creation of the
      > account.

      Creating the account is "opting in". It's voluntary. You don't have to do it. It won't happen unless you deliberately do it.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:It should be OPT IN by maxume · · Score: 1

      Read this page:

      http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743

      The Google dashboard shows data actively generated by users, not things like server logs and cookies.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  34. Don't forget Flash cookies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my humble opinion they're far worse than regular cookies! ( in that they are more pervasive / sneaky / hidden )

    Firefox Plugin to delete the Flash cookies:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623

    Wikipedia page on Flash cookies:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Shared_Object

  35. My search history by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

    There really wasn't much information in my search history that can't be found in other ways:

    • Apparently i search much for function documentation for different programming languages : I study computer science
    • I'm politically interested in filesharing (search for arguments for and against stuff and visited piratpartiet.se ) : I'm publicly a member of the pirate party
    • I watch a nonzero amount of porn : I'm a man

    I've only looked through a few months of my search history and it was pretty interesting to see what i searched for back then

  36. Most cows are kept in a field, milked then killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most cows are kept in a field, milked then slaughtered, and they don't seem to mind. They make little effort to escape their field, look happy while chewing the cud as they are milked, and only in the last few minutes of their lives do they show signs of concern. By then of course, it is too late.

    What most people think doesn't matter when one person can see what is happening and appreciates the consequences. It is their view I am interested in.

    To you Mad Merlin, I say moo. Keep chewing the cud.

  37. IF you don't like it, don't use it. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    The very essence of Google is to be a service that uses information it gathers about you to connect you to the people that you want. If you don't want that service, then don't use Google. How's that? The reason I say that is, many of us don't really care about the collection of personal data, and making Google jump through hoops to do what you want undermines the services that we want.

    --
    This is my sig.
  38. Not so obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is a service which most people who use the internet use. If a service is sufficiently successful it increasingly becomes an obligatory part of life. The pressure builds up to use the service. For example, in London in order to travel on the underground or the buses without the system logging your travel details you have to pay twice as much for day tickets. That cash incentive is there to put pressure on you to give in.

    Google provides a whole range of services too. Many of them are only available if you log in. The more and better those services are, the more people will succumb.

    It is very hard indeed to not register somewhere on the internet if you are to take advantage of the services available.

    No, it is not bleedingly obvious.

  39. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by icebraining · · Score: 1
  40. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > What about Google ads(or any other tracking mechanism)...

    I block all ads, all Google cookies, and most other cookies. I rarely permit Javascript or Flash to run.

    > ...or when Google buys a company that you used to use instead of Google?

    What company would that be?

    > It's not as simple as not using their products, unfortunately.

    It's as simple as understanding that nothing you put on a server run by someone with whom you do not have an NDA is secret.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  41. If MS was smart, .... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    They would borrow from Google (as opposed to out and out stealing from small companies). In particular, MS grips all the time about Windows being stolen. Simply put a dashboard on it and tell the user what they know of the user (which MS has even MORE knowledge of the user). The reason is that a number of the users simply do not know that they are using a stolen version. I suspect that most users who 'borrow' a copy of MS do not think about it, but would rethink it through if they were labeled theves by MS and SAW IT. Heck, it might have been enough money to avoid those massive layoffs (nah; that is really about shifting jobs to India and China; like Verizon, Qwest, IBM, GE, etc).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  42. Re: My data isnt Google's data by u64 · · Score: 1

    You have the freedom to share your data with Google.
    But i dont have the freedom to choose not to. That's
    the principle. I want you to have the freedom of chioce.
    But i also want that freedom for me too.

    At this point Google isnt a BadGuy. But Google cant guarantee
    us that it will behave like this next year or even next week.
    That's the second principle.

    CONCLUSION
    Google = Spyware

    I'm doing everything i can think of to protect my freedom of
    choice over who and what have my data.

    Opera default settings: NoCookies NoFlash NoReferer
    Then edit 'Site Preferences' for sites that really need it.
    (More work is in progress...)

    I also block Flash-Cookies.
    rd /s /q "%AppData%\Adobe"
    rd /s /q "%AppData%\Macromedia"
    md "%AppData%\Adobe"
    md "%AppData%\Macromedia"
    copy /y NUL "%AppData%\Adobe\Flash Player"
    copy /y NUL "%AppData%\Macromedia\Flash Player"
    md "%UserProfile%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe"
    md "%UserProfile%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia"
    copy /y NUL "%UserProfile%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe\Flash Player"
    copy /y NUL "%UserProfile%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player"

    Btw, i would never PAY to be anonymous. I see it as a Human Right, and we should
    never have to pay for that.

  43. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by felipekk · · Score: 0, Troll

    Can you think of Internet without using Google's Services?

  44. YouTube by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.

    I discovered I am a female on my youtube acct. No wonder I get so many personal messages from guys.

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:YouTube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine says

      1. Race = Rock
      2. Gender= Klingon
      3. Hobby = Hitting Fools in Head
  45. Info leaks by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Mostly because while they had no personal info leaks in past

    Well, none that we know about.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  46. And cows are happier that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of that, most cows can be pretty happy (if they aren't treated badly) for 99% of their life. Not worrying about the future, just enjoying the time they have in the ways they can.

    What gives the one dissonant voice the right to say how all the others should live their lives as his view would be the only right one.

    Anyone who ever calls other people sheep in a negative way because they have different priorities in life is likely to be a very close minded person. It is unlikely that their opinions are worth the time it takes to listen to them but you kinda have to because those "PEOPLE ARE SHEEP!" guys tend to be very vocal about themselves.

    1. Re:And cows are happier that way by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you think that cows (or any other animals we eat) are happy before they die and are treated well, you're laboring under a heavy illusion. Their lives are pretty fucked up both before they come to die and while they die as well.

      In this regard, I can confidently say that their lives are not happy.

    2. Re:And cows are happier that way by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      he clearly said people are cows, not sheep. i dont think you know what you are talking about!

  47. What do they save when you use Dashboard? by rbrightwell · · Score: 1

    HasSomethingToHideFlag = True;

  48. Where do these people come from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've got some news: The government not only knows every place you've been on the internet, they also know the content of all your email and chats. And don't think that SSL will fool them. Your only hope of obfuscating what you're doing on the internet is STRONG encryption.

    You should really take a course about computer science some time. You know, a beginner course or two to understand some of the basic concepts that you talk about. Just to make yourself not sound like an idiot. Occasionally visiting some informative websites might also be worth considering.

    Actually working in IT (whether it is for the government or for the private sector) would also help a good deal but those would require some knowledge about the subjects... But hey, it's the recession. Now is a pretty good time to go back to school. :)

    Just to spare you the trouble of studying things yourself, I can tell you: No, government doesn't have time to break all the "weak" cryptographic connections. Not even relatively close. Nor do they have the interest to do so. And companies sure as hell don't like giving all their data over to the government for no reason. Especially as most of the "all the places in the internet" are outside US borders.

  49. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    "Can you think of Internet without using Google's Services?"

    You are aware that the Internet existed prior to Google's "services"? Really, it wasn't that long ago that Google was just search.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  50. It's Friday morning by The+name+is+Dave.+Ja · · Score: 2, Funny

    But at the same tine, the ...

    I guess we'll see a fork coming soon.

    ---

  51. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by steelfood · · Score: 0, Troll

    GP was being sardonic. You can't possibly "'not using a company's products and services' in order to prevent them from collecting data." unless you want to become a hermit.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  52. Why NOT to block analytics data and cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I used to work for a company specializing in SEO, conversion analysis, etc... I used to block many analytics, ads, etc. before I worked in the field for about a year. After seeing how those statistics are used, I don't do that anymore. (I still block the most annoying, flashing banners, popups, etc... But that's it.)

    Why would I do that?

    Seriously, people. That data is used to something useful.

    You go to a site with too much ads and leave? Analytics data tells the website owner "There is high bounce rate on this page, maybe I should change something?". That combined to low click through rate with ads is a clear sign that those should be removed or changed.

    Click through rates on ads also - by themselves - tell either the website owner or the ad provider that you aren't interested in that kind of ads and should be offered something else. And if the rates are poor for everyone, the rates tell "Nobody cares about these ads. Offer something else."

    So that data helps make websites better for you and everyone else. Well, you might say "I'll just block the ads, why should I care?". And there are two answers.

    If everyone did what you did, a lot of websites you find useful couldn't continue being online. Isn't it better if there are useful, non-annoying ads? Ads actually can be interesting. I've often seen ads for products I might be interested in, about open jobs, etc... I guarantee that somewhere in the universe there is an ad that you could find interesting.

    The other answer is that this applies to more than just ads. You visit some site, think that "This is neat" and try to register or perhaps buy something from the store but then encounter something annoying: It asks for information you don't want to provide, for example. Then you leave. Now, if a lot of people do the same and webmasters have access to analytics, they can find that problem and eliminate it. Same applies for UI changes to a website, etc...

    Pretty much everything you can do to make a website better for your users is dependant on your access to statistics about their behaviour. That is what they are used for and that is what you are preventing when you block analytics. Trust me, nobody cares to follow your individual statistics among the millions. People only care about bounce rates on specific pages, etc...

  53. Forget google, worry about your cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cell phone provider knows where you are, who you call, what you text, the people you call, where you are travelling, the sites you are surfing, etc. Forget google and start worrying about the real issues.

  54. You can also use Scroogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to do a bit of anonymizing on your google searches you can use http://www.scroogle.org/ or https://ssl.scroogle.org/ . These can be added to your browser search bar (e.g. so Ctrl-K sends off a search).

    Note: NOT scroogle.com: that is a NSFW site :-/

  55. Irony by Reziac · · Score: 1

    To use Dashboard, you cannot remain anonymous.

    Occurs to me that you could also use it to learn what the system knows about *other* people...

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Irony by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? How?

    2. Re:Irony by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Depends how secure it is and how good you are at figuring out usernames and passwords :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Irony by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Yep - and if I'm that good and that determined, digging through your google search history is probably pretty low on my list of ways to fuck with you.

    4. Re:Irony by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Likely so. Tho some of these kids seem to have nothing better to do!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  56. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Avoid directly using a company's services to protest "the capitalism ahoy" way!
    2. Take no steps towards consumer protection regulation
    3. Watch as the company utterly ignores the tens of slashdot geeks avoiding their service.
    4. Company profits!!!

  57. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um, dude, how are you going to monitor the licensees?

  58. I am a figment of the GooglePlex imagination by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I dont not really exist, save as an extension of the GooglePlex.
    And I will never die, living forever in the GooglePlex.

  59. Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data by awshidahak · · Score: 1

    You could use No-Script and not whitelist google-analytics.com. Also, while you're at it, get cookie monster and once again, don't enable google.

  60. Different accounts now LINKED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in an attempt to have Google know less about me I need to use a utility that will LINK my different accounts into one Dashboard?

    I can't even remember the details of the different account I continuously create to use, post,review, etc. Why would I want to link them TOGETHER for Google to know MORE about me!

  61. It is like they are trolling own "customers" by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Google really started to act like Microsoft, they are annoying their own customers and almost proud of it. Privacy organizations should sue them for this joke claiming to show what they know about you. It is just a freaking account control panel trick, nothing else. If it is _really_ what Google knows about a web surfer, their share price is not right and that should be investigated.

    Note to Google (same thing I said to MS, Apple etc.): We aren't stupid.

  62. Scroogle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody mentioned Scroogle. Think Scroogle should be mentioned. You can start Scroogling by going to the Scroogle homepage: https://ssl.scroogle.org/ . Note the https: something Google doesn't provide.

  63. web history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Web history appears to be turned off by default. You must have enabled it, or used one of their applications that for some reason enabled it. Mine was empty.

  64. Re:Most cows are kept in a field, milked then kill by bruceslog · · Score: 1

    Most cows are kept in a field, milked then slaughtered, and they don't seem to mind. They make little effort to escape their field, look happy while chewing the cud as they are milked, and only in the last few minutes of their lives do they show signs of concern. By then of course, it is too late.

    What most people think doesn't matter when one person can see what is happening and appreciates the consequences. It is their view I am interested in.

    To you Mad Merlin, I say moo. Keep chewing the cud.

    Dude, do you know how long a cow would last in the Serengeti ? Or even in the woods in upstate NY ?
    As soon as the lions and tigers and bears caught a sniff of that cow, said cow would be chased down until it either fell from exhaustion or was tackled by fangs and claws in it's neck. Then it would be mercilessly ripped apart while alive, to feed the animals above it in natures food chain.
    Said cow might last 2 days in the wild. 2 days of nervous 'freedom' while it looked for food whilst trying to not become food.
    So, you're right. A cow in a field full of food and virtually no predators would stay put, happily.
    Hell, we humans pretty much do the same.
    Even though this cow still ends up being food someday, it has a better life. ( I'm talkin' field raised cattle here, obviously. The pen operations suck. )
    With humans, I would venture to say that the cow's death is less dramatic, and probably less painful.

    Getting back on the subject,
    The point is,
    If you aren't living in the wild yourself, then somebody, somewhere, has your history. Your credit history, your employment history, you health history, your shopping history, your web page history, and on and on...
    If you use a shopping card, Like Krogers, Marsh, IGA, etc, then you probably get coupons in the mail for just the exact foods that you like to eat and that you normally buy. Your coupon is a thank you for having allowed your grocer to sell your purchasing and eating habits to other firms. Your bank regularly sells your information to brokers, insurance companies, mortgage lenders, and anyone else with some cash to pony up for the information. In fact, almost ALL of the companies you've Ever done business with, sells your information in some form or another. This gives them even more income to further enhance their bottom line.
    So why are you so paranoid about this company verses all the others ?

    btw, this is all Just in case you were unaware of, but might become interested in, this view.

    --
    If it has tires or tits, it will give you problems.
  65. Medical Privacy Protection??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read on one reputable computer magazinesite, and they confirmed to another that I use, that attorneys for MS, Google, etc., argue, surprisingly, that your medical data stored with them is NOT protected by the federal HIPAA or state medical privacy laws. Why not? More verifiable iinfo please.