Slashdot Mirror


HP To Acquire 3com For $2.7 Billion

An anonymous reader writes "HP and 3Com Corporation today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which HP will purchase 3Com, a leading provider of networking switching, routing and security solutions, at a price of $7.90 per share in cash or an enterprise value of approximately $2.7 billion. The terms of the transaction have been approved by the HP and 3Com boards of directors."

231 comments

  1. I was recently wondering... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... what happened to 3com. Some of us remember "back in the day" when 3com was one of the top brands for network cards (3c503 or 3c509 anyone?). Then their cards disappeared from the market some years ago, apparently they decided to focus on other areas. I guess it isn't a huge surprise that they would become a target for acquisition.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      3C905B-TX
      Possibly the most compatible card I have ever used. (Every OS except >= Vista supports it). Now they're super cheap on the electronic bay.

    2. Re:I was recently wondering... by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      It's all about the tulips baby.... *sniif*

    3. Re:I was recently wondering... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      They did move on to other areas, and did a fine job with those as well. They made some very good and affordable VoIP phone systems, for one.

      In fact with all the hand-outs to large companies on wall street lately, just a few weeks ago I was thinking of 3Com as a ripe target for takeover. Should have gone with that gut feeling and bought some stock I suppose.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:I was recently wondering... by sopssa · · Score: 0

      I remember 3com from their bluetooth stack for Windows, which was a tons better than the default one. At that time I had to use gprs connection for internet, with bluetooth connection going from my laptop to my phone. Even if there was some nuisances still on the 3com stack (my crappy image of bluetooth still lasts because it was so bad at the launch), most of the problems went away after changing from Windows own one.

    5. Re:I was recently wondering... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      PCI appeared, and with that the 3c905 and 3c900. Their primary distinguishing feature was that the actual chip used on the card changed every few months requiring a new driver without a change in product number. Then the DEC 21xxx (tulip) series appeared and 3com became just a bad memory.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    6. Re:I was recently wondering... by NoYob · · Score: 2, Insightful
      3c509 - that was the first card I used when I first started messing with networking in Linux - Slackware - going through config files in /etc....

      *breaks down sobbing*

      I need a hug!

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    7. Re:I was recently wondering... by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Funny

      *breaks down sobbing*

      I need a hug!

      PTSD or nostalgia?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3C905C-TXM

    9. Re:I was recently wondering... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      ... what happened to 3com. Some of us remember "back in the day" when 3com was one of the top brands for network cards (3c503 or 3c509 anyone?). Then their cards disappeared from the market some years ago, apparently they decided to focus on other areas. I guess it isn't a huge surprise that they would become a target for acquisition.

      That's ancient history. My most recent memory of 3com is a 3C16470 switch that needed to be power cycled on a weekly basis.

    10. Re:I was recently wondering... by coobal · · Score: 1

      See, i remember the 3c509's well - that's all they would support at my university (no generic isa NE2000 cards allowed in 1996...) The 3c900's were crap - they had problems with DMA and I helped a fortune 500 company replace all those cards. The 905's were good - I may have one or two various revisions lying around - they always seemed to work with every OS I would ever throw at them.

    11. Re:I was recently wondering... by dhammabum · · Score: 1

      Talk about notalgia... I vaguely remember an etherserver card on thin ethernet (coax) back in the mid-late '80s - they and bass-ungermann had the ethernet market (aside from Novell that is).

      I, too, wondered about 3com but like Apple, they had it and they lost it.

      --
      I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
    12. Re:I was recently wondering... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the world of computers it's usually a bit of both.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    13. Re:I was recently wondering... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See, i remember the 3c509's well - that's all they would support at my university (no generic isa NE2000 cards allowed in 1996...)

      $ORKPLACE (a university) mandated the 3c509 because we apparantly had lots of problems getting Banyan Vines to work properly through generic NE2000 clones. When PCI came along we moved to the 905. Then we went Netware, and the on-board Intel and Tulip chips got really good, and separate NICs became an un-needed extra cost for most applications here - I could easily believe the same thing happened elsewhere, too. A couple of years ago I fished about 20 new-in-box 3c509b's from a skip; don't know what I'll use them for but they were just too good to let go into landfill, I'll probably wait until supplies dry up and eBay the suckers to the desperate if I can't find anything else to do with them.

      The 905's were good - I may have one or two various revisions lying around - they always seemed to work with every OS I would ever throw at them.

      They're lovely. I've got a whole stack of various revisions of them too, mostly pulled from computer carcasses because they were too good to throw away, and they're great as second or third or fourth interfaces in machines that need them.

    14. Re:I was recently wondering... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Banyan Vines ....

      Now, that's a name I've not heard in a long time... A long time.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:I was recently wondering... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Vista doesn't support the 3C905???

      Why doesn't that surprise me? Do you need a Network Interface card with liquid cooling for Vista?

    16. Re:I was recently wondering... by nametaken · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oddly I'll always remember 3com for having bought up US Robotics.

      Does that make me old? :(

    17. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I remember some problems with the tornado cards.... They liked to sync up at 100Mbit half duplex for me and they'd "work" for a while and then just start crawling. As far as cards go, I've never looked back form e100 and e1000.

      Since then, 3Com has continued to sort of do stupid things (search for the 'Audrey') and erode their brand, all while producing a fairly consistent stream of cash. The 3Com brand is still pretty strong outside of North America. In the last handful of years they've partnered with Huawei (the company that won't sell stuff here because they very blatantly copied Cisco) 3Com formed a venture with them called H3C which it bought outright a year or two ago. Dollar for dollar the H3C parts are very competitive with Cisco and everyone else, and they happen to be fairly decent products at the same time. Now they're completely China made, most of 3Com's employees are in China, so there might be some loyalty issues people have but as far as the products go, they can hang with anybody right now. There is a giant "support" question, but honestly, and I'm a software guy, if you can program one switch, router, or firewall you can program just about any of them. (If that's a hard thing for you to do, you're probably not a terribly good network engineer) Cisco will have you believe that there is a tremendous value in their CCIE and CCNP and what have you but when you look at what it costs to go HP or H3C vs Cisco, it's enough to think about.

      Looks to me like it's the HPQ/Procurve/H3C monster, Juniper and Cisco that make network hardware in North America, I'd only add Huawei to fill it out world wide. I suspect brocade and the others are the big losers, they've been in trouble for a long time anyways, so has extreme and who knows what state enterasys is in now. I couldn't just outright recommend h3c gear but from what I've seen, the value proposition is pretty compelling, they have better measurables than Cisco does in just about every category, especially price.

    18. Re:I was recently wondering... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Error. ORKPLACE not defined.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    19. Re:I was recently wondering... by Leebert · · Score: 3, Funny

      PCI appeared, and with that the 3c905 and 3c900. Their primary distinguishing feature was that the actual chip used on the card changed every few months requiring a new driver without a change in product number.

      Don Becker came one time to do a demo at work. He brought a stack of CDs to clusterify a bunch of PCs (I don't remember exactly what he was trying to accomplish, to be honest. It's long enough ago that it's fuzzy)

      Anyhow, when his CDs booted, they didn't recognize the revision of the 905's in the machines. I always got a kick out of seeing Becker himself get bitten by that. Made me feel a little better about running into problems myself.

    20. Re:I was recently wondering... by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Vista driver because the card doesn't support the HD DRM requirement for the ability check that you haven't physically modified the card in the last 1/30th of a second...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    21. Re:I was recently wondering... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Funny, I was thinking about their 10base2 adapters. Worked pretty well with Pathworks.

      No, those pants do not make you look old.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    22. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly I'll always remember 3com for having bought up US Robotics.

      Does that make me old? :(

      Knowing that myself got me a free coffee mug back in '97. I was in senior seminar in college and a speaker from 3com asked which modem company they had acquired. I new the answer because I was constantly checking the US Robotics web site to look for new firmware for my firmware upgradeable modem (high tech stuff back then). That was the best modem I ever had. I purchased it as a 28.8k back in `94, upgraded it to a 33.6k and later to 56k. I finally go rid of it in 2002 when I moved to an area where I could get broadband.

    23. Re:I was recently wondering... by msouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the world of computers it's usually a bit of both.

      Stockholm ptsd--when you can't distinguish it from nostalgia.

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
    24. Re:I was recently wondering... by Miseph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As somebody who was forced to use dial-up at home until 2005 (no broadband was available), I can attest that US Robotics modems were the best after the buyout as well. Connections virtually never dropped, they worked in every OS I threw at them, and they always made the best of the fact that the phone line wouldn't accommodate better than 28.8... Now that I think about it, the two I owned were outstanding, but I still don't miss them even a little.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    25. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly I'll always remember 3com for having bought up US Robotics.

      Does that make me old? :(

      Possibly, but not much more than me. Funny thing at the time was that from a teenager's perspective, everybody knew who US Robotics was and nobody knew who 3com was. Everybody who had a computer had a modem and went BBSing, and nobody had a job. We were wondering how this upstart no-name company had managed to buy one of the biggest names in the marketplace.

      Then they bought the naming rights to Candlestick Park.

    26. Re:I was recently wondering... by klui · · Score: 1

      You're a young buck. USR used to be USR before they were purchased by 3com.

    27. Re:I was recently wondering... by humphrm · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember when everyone knew who Hayes was, and nobody knew who USR was. USR was the underdog in that battle, and eventually switched roles from the David to the Goliath. But anyway 3COM was hardly a no-name company when they bought USR; Bob Metcalf invented Ethernet and founded 3COM and at the time was the God Of All Things to network geeks. He put ethernet adapters into VAX machines that had previously been stand alone systems in Universities, connected them all up, and made the Internet go. By the time of the buyout, 3COM was riding high on the sales of NICs and USR was the king of dial-up. It was a match made in heaven. Until both markets collapsed, for different reasons. I miss those days.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    28. Re:I was recently wondering... by coobal · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention Ungerman-Bass - At work, we had to set up an old VAX for developers so that they could port data and code to an AS/400. The Vax came through with only a AUI connector for ethernet. Back in the 90's, I had grabbed an Ungerman-Bass tpau to 10bt adapter off of a skid, and It finally came in handy. The really funny thing is this happened six years ago.

    29. Re:I was recently wondering... by DarthBart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the telemarketing company I worked at in 1995, the Tandem mainframe interfaced with the rest of the world through interface computers called MLADs (Multilan Attachment Devices). The MLAD required a 3c503 coax interface card configured to a particular IO address & IRQ for the Tandem side interface an a 3c509 TPE interface card on another particular IO address & IRQ. It wouldn't work with any other card.

      There were 4 racks of those machines. All transporting NetBIOS over IPX between the Tandem and the rest of the workstations.

    30. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead, 10 years now. Active Directory (Microsofts version of LDAP) rubbed out any advantage Street Talk(tm) by Vines had. All bits of the company were liquidated over 10 years ago.

    31. Re:I was recently wondering... by Snospar · · Score: 1

      I still don't miss them even a little.

      Not even a tiny bit? What about the sound of your ISP being dialled then that short burst of noise as you got a connection?

      And how about waiting for that huge download (say 5MB) to finish when you hear a click and watch your connection drop before you hear "Sorry, were you using the phone-line, honey?"

      Oh wait, you were right in the first place.

      --
      Moore's law is not a law. Theory, yes; Predictable trend, certainly; Law, no.
    32. Re:I was recently wondering... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I still have my USR Courier V.Everything external modem. Best investment ever.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    33. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ancient history. My most recent memory of 3com is a 3C16470 switch that needed to be power cycled on a weekly basis.

      Really? We still have a number of 3com switches, 3C17302, 3CBLSG48, and a few others, and they have never, ever had a problem. Some of them have years of continuous uptime.

    34. Re:I was recently wondering... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Does that make me old? :(

      I still have my original USR HST. Back in '89 they were running a beta program for selected BBSs to test out their brand-spankin'-new 14.4k technology. If memory serves, they only worked at 14.4 when connecting to other HSTs. Now those were fuckin' L33T!

      Once those came out most of the decent pirate hubs went 9600+ only. Ahh... the slow-ol-days.

    35. Re:I was recently wondering... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Hayes - ah the memories. I never actually even owned a Hayes modem but I can still remember using modems in DOS when pretty much every modem was a "Hayes or Hayes-compatible". My first unit was a 2400 BAUD unit that was so slow that you had to watch as it painstakingly rendered a page of plain text over the course of a few seconds. Just downloading an small 640x480 image file was a 10-15 minute ordeal. I remember the little 5 MB shareware copy of Doom I downloaded from a BBS taking 5-6 hours to download. My mom bought the modem for me as a gift for like $20 - 3 weeks later after constantly picking up our only phone line only to hear that tell-tale static yet again she was cursing her decision to ever get it :).

      Strange that the 14.4kbps modem I eventually upgraded to felt like lightning at the time (which given the size of your average file I downloaded back then, and the fact that most of my "online" activity was still via text-interface BBS systems, it really wasn't that bad).

      Now I really feel old (and I'm not even 30 yet - just got into the stuff early in life :)).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    36. Re:I was recently wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to do with cow orkers.....

    37. Re:I was recently wondering... by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

      Tulip was DEC, not 3com, right?

    38. Re:I was recently wondering... by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

      I always was more of a fan of Hayes modems rather than USR ones.

    39. Re:I was recently wondering... by nbvb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You realize that Banyan was "collaborating" with MS on AD correct?

      So much of AD is direct from Banyan... still.

    40. Re:I was recently wondering... by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      Crap I think you're right... I just remembered "old NIC that was rock solid" and tulip was the first result that came back

    41. Re:I was recently wondering... by socceroos · · Score: 1

      That was the killer for me. My brother and I would start a 5mb download of some game and leave it running over night - but the connection was so unstable that it was hit-or-miss as to whether or not it had finished downloading before the connection died.

    42. Re:I was recently wondering... by ray.dioactivman · · Score: 1

      I remember it so very well. I think that I miss it, but if you put any of its consoles in front of me, I'll quickly change my mind. One thing I do miss is its permissions checking to help figure out why someone in 50 different security groups was being denied access to a resources. It was like, denied because of this ( big pointer to reason)!

    43. Re:I was recently wondering... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      What killed the network interface card market was the fact that almost every new motherboard built in the last 6-7 years at minimum sport a 100Base-T Ethernet port (most of the latest motherboards now have 1000Base-T Gigabit Ethernet ports).

    44. Re:I was recently wondering... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was thinking about their 10base2 adapters. Worked pretty well with Pathworks.

      No, those pants do not make you look old.

      But the length of RG-8 in your pocket makes you look happy.

    45. Re:I was recently wondering... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      .. unlike the 3C501, which was a nightmare. Couldn't handle back-to-back packets as I recall.

    46. Re:I was recently wondering... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware they still existed as a separate organization. I had assumed that they were bought out by Cisco or NetApp years ago.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  2. Awkward by symbolset · · Score: 4, Informative

    Somebody talked. The options market started heating up hours before the announcement.

    It looks like it's going to be a good fight, as the traditional tech companies merge transformer-style into a pair of consolidated all-in-one providers. Maybe they'll battle to the death for every server room dollar.

    All the while Apple sews up more and more lines in the consumer electronics market and Jobs smiles subtly. It's almost as if he knows what happens once we've consolidated everything in the datacenter.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Awkward by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm more surprised when someone *doesn't* talk, to be honest.

    2. Re:Awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This comment is so well-written, I can just envision the comic book version of it...

    3. Re:Awkward by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All the while Apple sews up more and more lines in the consumer electronics market and Jobs smiles subtly. It's almost as if he knows what happens once we've consolidated everything in the datacenter.

      Apple does nothing in the datacenter or networking and these companies do little in consumer electronics. I doubt the merger will mean much to Apple.

    4. Re:Awkward by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > "Apple does nothing in the datacenter or networking..."

      Yeah, I'm not impressed with 2 billion billable downloads either....

    5. Re:Awkward by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm not impressed with 2 billion billable downloads either....

      I don't want to be rude, but that has nothing to do with what I wrote.

    6. Re:Awkward by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yes, Apple is a consumer in the datacenter market. So is WalMart. So is Burger King.

    7. Re:Awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cheers to symbolset for somehow pandering to mac downsies in an enterprise networking story.

    8. Re:Awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Apple has nothing to do with this, I don't know why the GP brought up Apple...

      This acquisition will probably impact Cisco most.

    9. Re:Awkward by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They produce rack-mounted servers (XServe). They used to sell their own rack-mounted disk arrays (XServe RAID) but now resell stuff from Promise. They produce their own server OS (OS X Server) and SAN software (XSAN). They aren't major players in the datacenter market, but they are players and they use their own stuff for the Apple Store and iTunes Store.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Awkward by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they won't sell a decent maintenance contract on any of it.

      Try getting a G4 or G5 XServe power supply out of them. That certainly taught us not to let the local Apple fanboy put things in the data center.

      --saint

  3. FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a current HP bastard (who didn't post this, BTW), this pissed me off. We've endured pay cuts, benefit cuts, no raises, mass firings, hell, my local office can't even purchase paper plates & disposable spoons, and somehow there's enough money to purchase another company.

    1. Re:FU HP by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Informative

      ... what else is new? The IT company I work for implemented 5% pay cuts across the board this year, and then went out and made a ~$2B acquisition.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:FU HP by raftpeople · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all about budgeting. They put in a line item for 2.7B acquisition, whereas you did not put in a line item for paper plates and spoons. Next time be more aggressive and the company picnic should be a little less messy.

    3. Re:FU HP by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As someone who is going through HP's Work Force Reduction, it was a shock to me too. I'll just bet my 88K salary put them over the edge for this buy. - HEX

    4. Re:FU HP by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Buying paper plates won't earn HP any money. Buying 3Com will.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:FU HP by confused+one · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not limited to IT. We matched last years numbers (which were record setting, by the way) and increased profitability. But... because our sister division's numbers sucked, No bonus for us, expansion is on hold, and capital expendatures on equipment we need for production is on hold. Meanwhile the parent corporation is buying up compatible businesses. So, why was it we busted our collective asses this year? Someone?

    6. Re:FU HP by amorsen · · Score: 1

      It's highly unlikely that HP will make money on that one. 3com doesn't have anything which HP doesn't have a better version of already. This makes even less sense than the Compaq deal.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    7. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      3com doesn't have anything which HP doesn't have a better version of already.

      TippingPoint. HP doesn't have anything in the IPS space.

    8. Re:FU HP by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shit like this is why I left 5 years ago. Get out while you still can, the old HP is dead and the zombie remnant doesn't give a shit about its employees.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:FU HP by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its funny. I know some body who was in middle management in HP in the 1990s. The was sick of the weekly meetings half way across the world and was praying for the money to run out.

      I guess it did.

    10. Re:FU HP by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And yet you (all) still work there.

      Quiet approval, that is called.

      And what it can create, is known as the Holocaust, today.

      It always takes two sides.

      It's just as much your own fault.

      Now cue the excuses...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:FU HP by Volund · · Score: 1

      As a current HP bastard (who didn't post this, BTW), this pissed me off. We've endured pay cuts, benefit cuts, no raises, mass firings, hell, my local office can't even purchase paper plates & disposable spoons, and somehow there's enough money to purchase another company.

      Obviously you don't work in sales. When I left because I hadn't gotten a raise in four years and they were slashing my tuition benefits, they were offering used JAGUARS from the sales fleet on the portal.

      I wish you the best of luck in finding greener pastures.

    12. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's life at EMC?

    13. Re:FU HP by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'So, why was it we busted our collective asses this year? Someone?'

      Because you are young, foolish, and naive and believe that hard work and diligence means something to a corporation.
      But don't worry; you will grow out of it :)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    14. Re:FU HP by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's highly unlikely that HP will make money on that one. 3com doesn't have anything which HP doesn't have a better version of already. This makes even less sense than the Compaq deal

      Patents.

    15. Re:FU HP by WonkoS · · Score: 1

      You were lucky.

      We used to dream of paper plates.

      Why, when I was a young man, our competitor would buy us out and the european union would step in and block the sale, causing mass layoffs and gutting the company beforehand.

    16. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? They were offering used Atari Jaguars? Damn they must have been desperate.

    17. Re:FU HP by hwyhobo · · Score: 1

      IT company I work for implemented 5% pay cuts across the board this year, and then went out and made a ~$2B acquisition

      /me waves from Santa Clara

      :)

      --
      End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
    18. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you're bitter because the $2.2B company's management now owns your ass because you used to work for the *other* company that was bought for less than $200M that now reports to the $2.2B company's e-staff. But what you don't understand is that your stock has climbed about 20% since the acquisition, and this whole HP nonsense with 3Com is in direct response to your company working with Cisco to make a move that HP felt the need to knee-jerk respond to. You should be proud that the future looks bright for you (or for someone who's lucky enough to have a shitload of ISO's vested from that $2.2B company considering the greater than 2:1 share allocation - not that I would know anyone like that)

    19. Re:FU HP by klui · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure your corporate executives got compensated well for it. Meanwhile people in the trenches need to do more with less, pay cuts, etc. Very nice scam companies are running these days, taking advantage of the economic situation.

    20. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP eliminated shift differential, 10-15% pay cuts for alot of us

    21. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... what else is new? The IT company I work for implemented 5% pay cuts across the board this year, and then went out and made a ~$2B acquisition.

      I take it you work at EMC.

    22. Re:FU HP by genik76 · · Score: 1

      Buying paper plates is a cost. Acquiring a company is an investment.

    23. Re:FU HP by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      "Get out while you still can, the old High-Tech Industry is dead and the zombie remnant doesn't give a shit about its employees."

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    24. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luxury!

      When I was young, the People's Liberation Army would storm into our office and crush us with their tanks, and spike our coffee with melanine.

    25. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not quiet approval. Not approval of any sort.

      In the current climate we still work there because we still have our jobs. But for how much longer is anybody's guess as they're now gonig through another round of redundancies. The bit I work in is simultaneously being told to shed approximately 20 people - and after earlier redundancies our ability to meet our contract deadlines is already being put at risk.

      AC for obvious reasons.

    26. Re:FU HP by theyulman · · Score: 1

      Let's hope HP won't screw up TippingPoint anymore than 3Com did!

    27. Re:FU HP by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      3com doesn't have anything which HP doesn't have a better version of already.

      Except for customers that can be converted to HP equipment. This is one reason why acquisitions happen - you get rid of a competitor (even a weak one) while gaining salesperson-customer relationships and upgrade sale incentives. Try getting that from paper plates and disposable spoons.

      --
      That is all.
    28. Re:FU HP by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope that HP does the decent thing and kills off the core switch and the edge routers.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    29. Re:FU HP by Moochman · · Score: 1

      Buying paper plates is also an investment. An investment in employees--in their loyalty, in their work ethic: in short, an investment in the products they will be producing, which is an investment in customer confidence, which means customer loyalty, which means long-term payoff that you can't get with these kinds of marketshare-buyout tricks.

    30. Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but H3C gear is a clear value add compared to the Procurve line. I wonder if 3COM's buyout of Huawei's interest in H3C doesn't also coincide with HP's sudden interest in buying 3COM. Tippingpoint isn't a bad pickup either.

  4. Apple??? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All the while Apple sews up more and more lines in the consumer electronics market and Jobs smiles subtly"

    Other than the iPod, Apple hasn't 'sewn up' any consumer electronic product.

    AppleTV is an utter failure.
    The iPhone is in third place in the smartphone market.

    And they sell overpriced x86 boxes to a niche market segment.

    1. Re:Apple??? WTF? by Conception · · Score: 1

      And they're selling more of them than ever.

    2. Re:Apple??? WTF? by symbolset · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The iPhone is the number one smartphone in the market by the metric that matters most to Apple: net profit.

      And they sell overpriced x86 boxes to a niche market segment.

      That would be the "profitable" niche - and they appear to have taken over the "profitable" corner of every game board they play on.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Apple??? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AppleTV is an utter failure.

      And an utterly predictable failure, too. Considering the laundry list of things it disappointingly doesn't even attempt to do poorly.

    4. Re:Apple??? WTF? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be the "profitable" niche - and they appear to have taken over the "profitable" corner of every game board they play on.

      Back in the Dot.Com era, there were plenty of companies out there that were all hype with little to show for it. I would continuously ask myself "Why does this crap sell?". Then the crash came, the companies that were nothing but hype were the first against the wall, they went away, the world went back to normal, and I said "Oh, now I understand!"

      Now, while Apple continues to sell slightly better than mediocre products for 10X what they're worth, on hype alone, I keep asking myself "Why?" With the economy in a slide, and history apparently repeating itself once again, I'm preparing, once again, to understand...

      MHO

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Apple??? WTF? by windwalkr · · Score: 1

      Now, while Apple continues to sell slightly better than mediocre products for 10X what they're worth, on hype alone, I keep asking myself "Why?"

      Which products were you referring to? I can think of a few of theirs that are a little exxy, but nothing like that much, and most of their products seem quite competitively priced. I can understand that people might want a configuration that Apple doesn't offer - and fair enough if that's you - but if you fall into one of their target markets, they're pretty hard to beat on price.

    6. Re:Apple??? WTF? by eknagy · · Score: 1

      Simple: You pay for what you need and what you want (if you can). The people buying expensive quality stuff want to buy quality stuff and don't mind if it's expensive. Same as Cisco.

    7. Re:Apple??? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood the frequency, uh oh....

      No. Seriously. I doubt I'll ever understand why hype can become a selling point for what is essentially nothing.

      Captcha: Hordes.
      Then again... I probably understand it a little better than I want to admit.

    8. Re:Apple??? WTF? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      while Apple continues to sell slightly better than mediocre products for 10X what they're worth, on hype alone,

      I suspect your ability to understand will depend on your willingness to re-examine your axioms.

    9. Re:Apple??? WTF? by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Not this time. Not with 30 billion cash in the bank.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    10. Re:Apple??? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, so up to 3% instead of 1%. Congrats, you almost beat out desktop linux. Unfortunately for apple, they have the EXACT same problem that linux has. The workforce doesn't use it. So when they go shopping to buy something for the family, they look at the apple, scoff at the price tag and get the latest dell/hp/whatever running windows. They probably aren't even aware of linux except possibly as "that hacker OS". This of course assumes they know what an OS is.

    11. Re:Apple??? WTF? by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      The obvious conclusion that you seem to have missed is that at least for some amount of people, Apple provides value worth the cost. This has been discussed many many many times before so I'm shocked you don't understand.

      Or perhaps you're just a troll, I couldn't be bothered to look at your posting history.

    12. Re:Apple??? WTF? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The obvious conclusion that you seem to have missed is that at least for some amount of people, Apple provides value worth the cost.

      People said that back in the Dot.Com era, too. Of course it always has to be a nebulous black box... Nobody will dare say WHAT value that is, because it didn't add up then, and it doesn't add up now. The most popular was "adaptive" something-or-other and man-power savings, at a price that would take hundreds of years to pay off...

      In short, with a trivial amount of effort, you can find adequate, or even superior products, for a much lower price.

      It's a great position to be in during the boom, but it's also the first to go when anything changes, and people are forced to justify their decisions.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. the suspense is over... by spywhere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I couldn't wait to find out which company HP would destroy next.

    1. Re:the suspense is over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out, your company's next.

    2. Re:the suspense is over... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll give you a hint. The company is referred to with a two letter acronym that starts with an "H". They've spun off all but one of their best divisions over the last decade, and they're about to fold their printer division (The last that makes anything innovative or of any quality) into the division that makes their worst-in-class PCs. They also just bought 3Com.

    3. Re:the suspense is over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always assumed it would be HP.

    4. Re:the suspense is over... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Well, I've had this HP loaner LCD for a couple of months and it works great, even after 96182 hours of backlight operation, or so the menu information screen says. It is kind of odd, considering it was manufactured only 7 months ago. I'm thinking the previous owner must have had a time machine or something.

  6. No, Compaq bought 3Com by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given what is left of HP after the hurricane Carly destroyed the place.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Knara · · Score: 1

      Sad, but true.

    2. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by MrEricSir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next on her agenda: governor California.

      Oh well, if she splits California in two it might not be a bad thing. Unless one of them winds up like Agilent.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    3. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by NoYob · · Score: 0, Troll
      When she was on 60 Minutes, Leslie Stahl mentioned the criticisms about Carly not being involved in day to day operations. Carly got all defensive and said she was.

      WRONG! The correct answer is: CEOs are strategists and are concerned with the big picture. The president of the company worries about day to day operations. She shouldn't have been involved with day to day operations. The critics didn't know what they were talking about - they were criticizing the wrong behavior.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    4. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by mirix · · Score: 1

      Unless one of them winds up like Agilent.

      Ridiculously expensive and world famous? Kinda sounds like socal.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    5. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by khallow · · Score: 2, Informative

      The HP/Agilent split had nothing to do with Carly. That was started under the previous CEO and pretty much completed by the time she showed up.

    6. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Next on her agenda: governor California.

      She as on TV the other night here and I had the distinct impression her aim was about one step above that position.

    7. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she will talk people into a merger between Ca and De. That way we will have 4 of the first 5 letters of the alphabet locked up. Unbeatable!

    8. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an EDSer that was acquired none of us have any love fior Mark Hurd the current CEO who has constantly lied about how the "merger" would work. 3Comers watch out your clients will be taken and your jobs sent overseas. Hurd only wants Sales people in the USA the rest can be done overseas or with H1Bs as they are cheap. HP desperately wants to be like IBM but won't sell off money losing laptops and the High end Itaniums servers can't compete with the p series. HP will be acquired by Apple in 10 yrs at this rate.

    9. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless one of them winds up like Agilent.

      Ridiculously expensive and world famous? Kinda sounds like socal.

      NorCal claims dibs on Agilent. Ridiculously expensive test equipment understandable only by nerds... but by God, it works.

      The HP brand goes with SoCal. Ridiculously expensive, it prints pretty pictures, the ink costs $60,000/gallon, the cartridges have DRM in them, and the printer driver, despite eating up 500 megabytes of diskspace, exists only to pop up a message saying that your HP FooJet2008 doesn't work with Linux, OS X, or Windows 7, and that you should recycle it and buy an HP FooJet2009.

    10. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      You don't mean: Skynet itself?!? GASP!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    11. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by KenSeymour · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, she is running for the U. S. Senate against Barbara Boxer.

      Maybe I'll send Senator Boxer a campaign contribution with a note:
      "I was laid off by Carly."

      You know, you can give money to campaigns out of state. So there are
      a good 15,000 potential donors right there.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    12. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      This is basically restoring one of the many useful bits of Agilent that were available in house before her masterful smashup job.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    13. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite botching it at HP, she's running for the US Senate, not California governor. My guess is the teabagger will wack her from the right, while her own record at HP just wacks her between the eyes. You do have to laugh though, considering how efffective a spokesperson she was for John McCain.

    14. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by dalan · · Score: 1

      Carly destroyed the place, and then she ransacked it. Please don't ever forget the ransacked part. I won't.

      --
      Cheers! -- Richard
    15. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahaha, wow. You just put "high end" and Itanium in the same sentence.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    16. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      With Carly as governor I predict she will manage the outsourcing of California state government to India.

      'Government 411 operator': Thank you for calling HP, i mean the State of California. May I have your serial number?
      Caller: Hello, I'm calling from Malibu. We need to call a State of Emergency. The water main broke and there's major flooding.
      Operator: There is flooding in Mumbai?
      Caller: No Malibu.
      2 hours later.
      Caller: No Malibu. M-a-l-i-b-u.
      Operator: Sorry. I cannot help you without a serial number.
      Caller: .... I'm drowning ......
      Operator: I can't hear you. Please call with the serial number. Or stop by office in Mumbai. Have nice day!

    17. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Her $20m golden parachute is indicative of why so many companies are badly run these days. CEOs incentives are not aligned with the company. It is very easy for the CEO do choose actions that benefit him or herself directly but don't benefit the company. It ought to be the responsibility of the board of directors, when considering a renumeration package, to ensure that the CEO (and other executives) only benefit personally when the company does well.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by nkpatel · · Score: 1

      Actually, she's running for Senate

    19. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Ah, but I see a major problem with your logic, and a barrier to its adoption in society:

      It makes sense.

    20. Re:No, Compaq bought 3Com by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know. It is old news by now, the problem is how to fix it. Any suggestions?

  7. Joy by EkriirkE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't wait for 500MB driver packages, 234454 running background processes and 7 tray icons required to configure the hardware.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could download their "driver only" packs and not get all that crap. Just saying.

    2. Re:Joy by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just you wait, my boy, just you wait...

      The ether cartridge that comes with the NIC is just a starter, it'll run out within a few hundred thousand packets(less if the packets contain more than ~50% 1s). Of course, only genuine HP ether is supported, for best possible data fidelity

    3. Re:Joy by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Also needing the better part of an hour to install the gorram driver.

      HP's more expensive business-type printers have decent drivers that only need 10MB or less disk space, and don't have bloated installers, but you'd never know it from the consumer shit.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Joy by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Just for kicks, if you don't need any of the fancy features, you can still use the old laserjet 4 drivers for brand new HP laserjet printers. Every large enterprise I've been in has standardized on them, they must be doing something right. Their consumer grade hardware is total shit though, a customer of ours decided to "save" some money by buying some printers from Best buy instead of the printers we recommended. They bought 2 HP printers, the drivers took 45 minutes to install out of the box.

      After the first one, I tosssed the cds in the trash and downloaded the "plug in play" drivers from the hp site, they only took 15-20 minutes to install.

    5. Re:Joy by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Those are not always available. Believe me; if I see a "network install" offering I'm elated.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    6. Re:Joy by McNihil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kids, this is what happens when sniffing ether.

    7. Re:Joy by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      I use token ring you insensitive clod! Speaking of which, I wonder if HP brand tokens last longer than the generic brand?

    8. Re:Joy by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Does that mean, you are already planning to buy their products when they arrive at that state? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:Joy by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing ether...

    10. Re:Joy by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      No, since they are a centrally controlled token of a large bureaucratic organization, the tokens will be inflated. This maintains the functionality of the token while allowing the value of the token to degrade to nothing. Last one on the ring which receives a valueless token falls off the network never to return.

      Unless you receive government tokens; but then that is a completely different communication protocol.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    11. Re:Joy by klui · · Score: 1

      Shipped out to customers in 24 carton boxes, all placed inside a bigger box.

    12. Re:Joy by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Yer token something.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    13. Re:Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nortonizing.

    14. Re:Joy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The LaserJet 4 drivers are basically 'Generic PCL Printer' drivers. You can also drive most of them as generic PostScript printers too. You only need the printer-specific drivers to use printer-specific features, which is as it should be.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Joy by afidel · · Score: 1

      I know it's a joke but Cisco is actually MUCH more like that on the networking side, HP offers lifetime warranties on the hardware and software updates are always free. The 5 year cost of a Procurve is a fraction that of a comparable Cisco switch. I still have all Cisco chassis based switches because they are bulletproof but on the economics side HP is definitely ahead.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Joy by Knara · · Score: 1

      The more recent 2xxx series printers aren't so hot, either. I've had to replace laser shutter "open" levers with a piece of paper simply because they cheaped out on the construction and made the original levers too thin.

  8. Borg by confused+one · · Score: 1

    It's starting to look like HP deserves the Borg moniquer more than Microsoft does.

  9. FU HP-3Com sockets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why this story is posted to the "getting buggered" department.

  10. Another one bites the dust. by Snufu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3com, we hardly knew-- ...Well, I guess we did know you. So long.

    What happens when there are no companies left to merge? You get China.

    1. Re:Another one bites the dust. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What happens when there are no companies left to merge? You get China.

      Actually, you get South Korea. Google 'Chaebol'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. I ceased wondering... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    I ceased wondering how Cisco ate 3Com's lunch when I had to integrate a couple 3Com switches the company CEO (an avid "bargain hunter") acquired into company LAN. To put it mildly, for manufacturing something that refused to play nice with other networking gears my only question is how they managed to stay in business this long.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  12. Plus ca change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big company buys ailing small company that had it and blew it

    Course, we all hope HP shares dont drop straight after the purchase...

  13. Valuation by TripHammer · · Score: 1

    Wow, they paid $7.90 per share, a 39% premium over today's closing price. Earnings are anemic but at least they are in the black. It will be interesting to see what HP had in mind. I'm still trying to comprehend how this was the best use for $2.7 billion in cash.

    1. Re:Valuation by timmarhy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i don't get it either. what can 3com possibly provide that HP doesn't already have? if carly hadn't of destroyed hp's RnD labs they could have built anything 3com have for a lot less then 2.7 billion.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Valuation by wtbname · · Score: 1

      Dont be an idiot, the best use of that cash would have been to give it to me ! OBVIOUSLY.

    3. Re:Valuation by tukang · · Score: 1

      3com can provide their customers/additional market share which perhaps hp can service at a relatively small cost by using their existing infrastrcuture and downsizing 3com's

    4. Re:Valuation by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Don't 3COM have an incredible amount of IP? I dare say this will be to help bolster their ProCurve line as a competitor to Cisco. Comparatively speaking, HP Procurve gear IME seems quite reasonable for the price, way less then Cisco and doesn't require a license to "legally" run the OS. Don't get me wrong, Cisco kit is nice if you can afford it, but by jeez do you pay a premium (I say this with a Cisco Phone sitting next to me and 5 Cisco switches in our rack... all trunking into a modular HP Procurve).

      3Com hardware IME was always top notch, I did wonder what happen to them, lets see what HP do from here.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    5. Re:Valuation by TripHammer · · Score: 1

      Yea, you are right. From the Wall Street Journal:

      David Donatelli, H-P's vice president in charge of the corporate-computer division, said 3Com has a better set of networking products for large corporate clients than H-P currently sells and a market share of more than 30% in the China networking market. With the deal, Mr. Donatelli said, "we get industry-leading products."

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704576204574530001155685762.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular

    6. Re:Valuation by inKubus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have a ton of IP, such as the patent for connecting VOIP calls to a regular PSTN, and didn't they just start flexing on their ethernet patents earlier this week? They had previously settled with Realtek for something like 70M + licensing and pretty much every other chip out there uses buffering. Obviously 70M is chump change to HP but I could see them getting 2B worth out of the rest of the 3com IP at least.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    7. Re:Valuation by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      HP's switches are practically free compared to Cisco's pricing (forgetting the rape that is smartnet) for functionally equivalent hardware. Throw in free firmware updates and a lifetime warranty, it's a great deal. Here's to hoping they leverage some of that IP and come up with competitive big-iron stuff that compares to the likes of the Nexus or 6500.

      --
      this is my sig
    8. Re:Valuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how much could you have build within RnD that wasn't already subjected to patented ideas? The buyout covers all that.

  14. They started buying companies by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Started with them in Massachusetts in '93. They had some of the worst and most disorganized upper management ever. The guys doing corporate strategy must have been ADHD. They would buy a new (usually startup) company every year...some good, some bad. Kept the original management for a year, then, after all the developers and original management had gotten PO'd and left, bought another company and did the same thing. Year after year. I'm not sure what they got out of it.

    I was laid off after they'd spent several years developing a gigabit enterprise switch, sold the first few, then made s surprise announcement that they were leaving the enterprise business. You can imagine how their major customers, who'd started to build new infrastructure using these switches, took that news.

    They did give out great clothing, though. Still have a collection. Great co-workers, good projects, extremely poor corporate management.

    1. Re:They started buying companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I was laid off after they'd spent several years developing a gigabit enterprise switch, sold the first few, then made s surprise announcement that they were leaving the enterprise business. You can imagine how their major customers, who'd started to build new infrastructure using these switches, took that news.

      At my mid-sized employer we had a 3COM 8800 core switch up until recently. When I started at the job earlier this year I made sure to get that thing the hell out of there in place of Cisco Catalysts or HP Procurves. The CLI interface was clunky, not well structured, and looks like 3COM tried to emulate how Cisco IOS is laid out. I was creating a trunk line between the 8800 and a 3COM workgroup switch and it took down the whole network. The funny thing is I followed the same procedure I always have, but for some reason this time it decided not to cooperate. My employer purchased this POS in 2005? for I'm guessing over $100k with all of the cards and it was the biggest waste of money. I was told that the "official" 3COM rep came in trying to sell them on this thing for months and for whatever reason the head IT guy at the time eventually decided to get it.

      I guess I don't really have much to expand on from your comment - just voicing my frustrations from working with that POS.

    2. Re:They started buying companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If workers owned their own factories production would .... increase. Sounds familiar.

    3. Re:They started buying companies by atamido · · Score: 1

      Great co-workers, good projects, extremely poor corporate management.

      So, just like AMD?

    4. Re:They started buying companies by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, AMD made a shocking mistake buying ATI. We can all see that ATI is sinking because their graphics cards just aren't competitive.

      Oh wait.....

    5. Re:They started buying companies by atamido · · Score: 1

      Buying ATI was one of the only good things AMD corporate has done recently. Talk to engineers at AMD about the past several years and you will get an ear full about the mismanagement that has been going on.

      Well, buying ATI was a potentially good move. It remains to be seen if they manage to leverage these incredible new resources they purchased. (And no, selling graphics cards labeled as "AMD" was not the point of purchasing ATI.)

    6. Re:They started buying companies by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      The switch I worked on was the CoreBuilder 9000...I think it was introduced (and cancelled) around 2002-3.

      The cards had custom Gigabit switch ICs - had a whole development team (12 people or so) just for that. Their new HP workstations were delivered the week after they were all RIFed...they sat around for a month until I mentioned to the director that they might be able to send them back to HP and get their money back, since the boxes hadn't even been opened.

  15. Re:I don't get it by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Calculators are a small part of HP's business and definitely not driving this merger. Someone was saying that HP might be doing this to better position themselves in the datacenter. I guess that they see the networking products of 3Com as another way to sell HP services. In other words, look at the high margin parts of HP. They are printer refills and various support services. I don't see the 3Com merger selling more printer refills, but it does look likely to open the door to more HP services.

  16. Maybe HP is for real... by voss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Adding 3com networking know-how to HP computing products may actually produce better products?
    Hey it could happen!

    1. Re:Maybe HP is for real... by maugle · · Score: 1

      It actually has a good chance of happening. After all, it's physically impossible for them to get worse.

    2. Re:Maybe HP is for real... by headpushslap · · Score: 1

      Can two Down's Syndrome parents have a non-Down's child? if so, I think you're right!

  17. when i first glanced at the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought it said "How To Acquire 3com for 2.7 Billion"

    and my initial thought was

    step 1: get 2.7 billion dollars...

    heh

  18. Re:I don't get it by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    HP already has its ProCurve line. It seems they mostly bought 3Com because it's big in Asia? That's what the talk is anyway,

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  19. they can HAVE it... by spywhere · · Score: 1

    I run a one-man PC repair company with about 750 customers. I'll happily sell it to HP for $12 million... or to you for $0.12 million.

  20. 3Com Woes, Good Luck HP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As an ex 10 year gold partner of 3Com (left this year), I can say their quality of goods has gone downhill for the past 3 years. There were nice margins in their equipment but their Layer 2 and 3 switches and cores were plagued with problems out of the box or after just a few months of usage in datacenters and enterprise. Numerous port deaths, uplink failures, stacking communication issues, etc...

    The NBX100 was revolutionary, and they still run like champs, however the new NBX and V IP series chasis became junk. Numerous VXWorks drive failures and PRI cards were constantly losing chassis connections. Not to mention the RMA process was wretched.

    Personally, I believe 3Com's downfall was to go against Cisco by undercutting on price which lead to cost cutting on manufacturing and high deviations. Basically putting them on par with Linksys, DLink, and NetGear.

    I hope HP turns them around in certain areas as it would be nice to possibly have decent manageable copper/fabric switching, especially for blades, at a more competitive price for budget concise decision makers that prefer HP in their shops.

  21. Re:I don't get it by moreati · · Score: 1

    My first thought, without RTFA, was:

    Cisco: Look our routers can run Linux and look at these x86 modules, we're getting into the server market.
    HP: Well screw you, we'll go and buy some networking market share.

    No idea how accurate that is, but it felt right.

  22. Don't tell the EC by TravisHein · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure [the EC] could spend almost a year to decide to object to this too.

    1. Re:Don't tell the EC by mgblst · · Score: 1

      God forbid a government actually trying to stop Monopolies and reduction in market fairness. How would that make sense? Lets live in the country with no basic health care for all its people, that is a great way to live.

    2. Re:Don't tell the EC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You complain about the government not stopping monopolies. Then mock it for not being the de-facto health care supplier in the market?

  23. Made me laugh... by bsd_usr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the thing... The company I work for has a few sister companies in HK and China. I work for the U.S. office.

    We recently (last year) upgraded our switches in the U.S. office. Previously, we were running 3Com switches of various types and models (3300's mostly of different kinds, and some 4200's). The decision to replace them was due to the fact they were getting old and the performance wasn't really there when you start daisy chaining 10 different switches to support over 200 ports.

    When looking for new switches, I looked at Cisco and HP. Our overseas IIT guy tried to get us to go the 3Com route once again, since that's what they use in the HK and China offices. Actually, they use Huawei branded switches as well as 3Com braded switches. If you don't know already, they're basically the same thing. He really tried hard to get us to go that route, but I would not budge. I did everything to show that 3Com had very little market share in the U.S. and thus very little support.

    Anyway, we ended up replacing the aging 3Com equipment with HP Procurve switches (5406 and 5412). We wanted to go with Cisco switches at first, but they were our of our budget. Next to Cisco, HP seemed like the most logical choice.So far, I'm happy with the decision.

    I just find it ironic that after the acquisition, that whole power struggle over which switch to use will be moot.

    1. Re:Made me laugh... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It isn't really moot. If you're lucky, HP will gut the 3Com line and you'll still use HP switches. If you're unlucky the reverse will happen.

  24. That name is getting clunky fast. by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

    3ComHPaq?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:That name is getting clunky fast. by simplexion · · Score: 0

      You forgot EDS

    2. Re:That name is getting clunky fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And DEC!

  25. Kerbango by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll revive the Kerbango

  26. 3c905c-txm = great card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS. Best, most compatible card I've ever used. Actually all cards in the main 3c905 series (3c905, 3c905b, 3c905c, -txnm or -txm) remain among the best Fast Ethernet cards, especially thanks to ubiquitous driver support (with shared compatibility between them, thanks to 3com's unified driver for this card series). I remember looking out to make sure I wasn't shipped 3c905cx cards in the later years. They were driver-incompatible with previous versions.

    I eventually moved to Intel Pro/100 S for the useful (at the time) 3DES IPsec offload ability, but even then 3com offered a similar chipset that reportedly outperformed it.

  27. Combating Cisco's Server Push by HockeyPuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is anybody surprised by this? Cisco announces a server product with very strong networking abilities. This is pretty much one of the few large areas of the datacenter (hardware wise) that Cisco hasn't moved into (besides disk arrays). HP sees this as a huge threat to them (bigger than IBM, who makes most revenue from services including running datacenters comprised of non-IBM equipment).

    HP now realizing that they don't have the networking expertise to go after cisco directly in the networking space (one area they need to expand into to gain marketshare in the datacenter beyond servers and HDS rebranded storage, or that midrange Compaq based arrays). Well, they could go after the #2 enterprise networking company (Juniper, but they have a market cap of ~$13B), so they pick up 3com and whatever is left of it (remember they used to be partnered a while ago with Huauei, that partnership is gone tho), so they can better fight against Cisco for networking.

    For these big companies it's all about expanding your presence and finding new revenue streams. Cisco can't seriously increase it's core routing/switching marketshare very easily any more than HP can increase its server marketshare.

    It's not always easy to grow your company organically (from within). Look at cisco, they buy security companies, storage switching companies, WebEx. Hell, when they were a router only company, they bought an ethernet switching company (Crescendo) which later became the bread and butter business for them.

    1. Re:Combating Cisco's Server Push by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hope that MBA turns out to be a good investment for you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Combating Cisco's Server Push by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Has everyone forgotten that HP makes procurve swithes

    3. Re:Combating Cisco's Server Push by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just buy Huawei to compete with Cisco?

    4. Re:Combating Cisco's Server Push by acey72 · · Score: 1

      Erm, apart from the fact the HP's Procurve networking kit is already enterprise class and shed loads better than anything 3Com has made in many years.

    5. Re:Combating Cisco's Server Push by afidel · · Score: 1

      I think HP had as much revenue from the networking division last year as this deal is valued at, I don't think they needed 3com to make a UCS competitor (they actually had one before UCS came out, c7000+Flex10).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  28. the real reason for HP's interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing tie-ins to the "I, Robot" sequel featuring US Robotics.

  29. So Did I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I immediately thought the same thing, but with all the new products announcements by Cisco and the heated competition between Juniper and Cisco at the enterprise end of the networking market and Huwei squeezing HP at the low end, this looks like a desperation move by the HP board room. It has the smell of fear all over it. The debt they are adding will sink them, if they make even a slight miscalculation.

  30. ProCurve Crap + 3Com Crap = Crappy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just when you thought ProCurve couldn't get any worse... lets add old crap from a company that went out of business, get this... for having crap!

  31. I read this as "HOW To Acquire 3com For $2.7B" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought, easy, first have $2.7 Billion. I think 3com would be low on my list of things to buy if I had $2.7 Billion. I think I'd just start small with,
    say, a yacht.

  32. Did they do this for the VoIP? by Deviant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've found HP's ProCurve Switches to be great with a lifetime warranty and free software updates compared to the Cisco equivilents which need SmartNet (maybe smart on Cisco's part) and cost 2-3 times as much.

    However with alot of my clients rolling out the Cisco Voice solutions the idea usually is they standardize on all Cisco kit including the switches. I wonder if this is HP's play to get into the IP telephony market (which 3Com's website indicates they are in) to complete their offerings so a buisiness will go all-HP in a similar fashion?

    1. Re:Did they do this for the VoIP? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      That was what I was thinking; HP doesn't have a strong VoIP brand, and vendors will often push proprietary network solutions with their VoIP installations. 3com sure as hell does it, as does Cisco. Maybe that's what HP is eyeballing.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Did they do this for the VoIP? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I've found HP's ProCurve Switches to be great with a lifetime warranty and free software updates compared to the Cisco equivilents which need SmartNet (maybe smart on Cisco's part) and cost 2-3 times as much.

      Funny, I've found HP ProCurve switches to be absolute trash. We purchased a few gigabit and 10 gigabit ProCurve switches because they were cheaper than Cisco, but then we found out they don't fully support such standard features as VLAN trunking, or say they support it but have strange incompatibilities when trying to work together in a Cisco environment. They also have terrible bugs in their firmware, which manifest themselves in production network outages.

      Never again. Cisco might be expensive, but if you want some enterprise, you better purchase the name brand. If you're looking for low cost and still want quality, go with something like a Force 10. ProCurve, on the other hand, are garbage.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    3. Re:Did they do this for the VoIP? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      We purchased a few gigabit and 10 gigabit ProCurve switches because they were cheaper than Cisco, but then we found out they don't fully support such standard features as VLAN trunking, or say they support it but have strange incompatibilities when trying to work together in a Cisco environment.

      This isn't limited to a Cisco environment, trust me. A few months ago I had one of the ProCurves in the serverroom go insane. Apparently it had decided that our LACP setup wasn't to its tastes, then decided that its partners were lying and in the end just started resending packets all over the place. The strange thing was, that it had worked nicely up to a point and that it changed behaviour without any apparent reason. Nobody had messed with the configuration, there was no power failure causing it to reset back to a previous state, nothing new was introduced to the network. Rest assured, it was a fun day.

      The worst part of it all is that they're quite expensive compared to a 3com 4200G that have the exact same features, but without the quirks. Long live company policy!

    4. Re:Did they do this for the VoIP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use HP Procurve's extensively as well, good kit, for what it is. Procurve has lacked a wan edge product portfolio that could compete with the IAD/ISR series from Cisco. H3C brings FXS/FXO channel banks to the edge, as well as an assortment of line cards, that were sorely lacking from Procurve's product portfolio. In addition, the H3C Datacenter and Carrier product lines are clearly leagues better then Procurve. procurve doesn't even have a carrier grade product line.

      The curious thing here, isn't what will happen to H3C, rather, it's what will happen to Procurve? Do they reposition Procurve for the entry level market and position H3C for the high end gear? Or do they just start killing off the Procurve product line and replace it with H3C. The Proliant lineup from HP was and I'd bet largely still is from the minds of the Compaq engineering crew.

      I've administered a 3COM VCX product for my former employer for a few years (still do from time to time). VCX is 3COM's enterprise SIP PBX product. The NBX product for SMB, built from essentially the same gear, seems to be a marketable product, however, it's been a couple of years since I looked at it. I don't believe anyone has anything to fear from this product line, but maybe it gets retooled to work with H3C gear similar to how Avaya packages it's gear and then they might have something.

  33. COMS is available by hey · · Score: 1

    I guess this purchase will free-up 3Com's stock symbol COMS (a pretty cool one).

  34. Possible insider trading by forand · · Score: 1

    There is some rather damning (IMO) evidence of insider trading on this deal. Seems like a very short sighted move on HPs part since the market price for 3COM was 5.30/share.

    1. Re:Possible insider trading by ray.dioactivman · · Score: 1

      Hey, where do you think the Golden Parachute money for 3Com execs was supposed to come from? The 401k trick failed so they just said sell everything and we can get our unfair share of the proceeds. :)

  35. ftp.3com.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before http this was the only way we talked to vendors to get drivers.

    for some reason i recall 3com was the only domain that started with a number for many years. can anyone verify this?

  36. What about the HP blade chassis? by rcolbert · · Score: 1

    I know that a few years back at my previous employer the only reason I was able to get HP blades into the DC was due to the inclusion of Cisco switches in the blade enclosures. I wonder if HP will continue offering Cisco switches, and if not how badly will it hurt their sales? I think it's a lot easier for a networking guy to bring in a foreign x86 server than it is for a server guy to bring in a foreign switch to the DC. Round 1 goes to Cisco.

  37. If they want patents... by Dreadrik · · Score: 0

    ...shouldn't they have bought US Ethernet Innovations instead?

  38. Remember Bob Metcalfe by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Remember Bob Metcalfe and all of the FUD he used to spout about Linux and Open Source?

    Bob used to answer the phone when I had a problem with the 3com card in my VAX-780. Then he was riding high for a while. I'd imagine he took out lots of cash while the company was a leader.

    1. Re:Remember Bob Metcalfe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but "Open Sores Movement" still makes me chuckle.

    2. Re:Remember Bob Metcalfe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember Bob Metcalfe and all of the FUD he used to spout about Linux and Open Source?

      According to Wikipedia, one of Metcalfe's comment was: "The Open Source Movement's ideology is utopian balderdash [... that] reminds me of communism. [...] Linux [is like] organic software grown in utopia by spiritualists [...] When they bring organic fruit to market, you pay extra for small apples with open sores - the Open Sores Movement. When [Windows 2000] gets here, goodbye Linux."

  39. follow the buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all a part of HP running to follow buzzwords. Cloud is the big buzzword today. So HP buys a company that can help them build big datacenters and sell some crap service. for the record, HP has been terrible at doing any sort of distributed hosting (anyone remember HP Upline? No? that's because it was shut down within a month after a serious security issue) FYI, HP also announced a VP for Cloud Computing today...

  40. HP now runs 3com gear internally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP loves eating their own dog food and will be replacing all their Cisco kit with 3com. Are the networking guys going to be running screaming? Or is the 3com gear actually good?

    1. Re:HP now runs 3com gear internally by afidel · · Score: 1

      Uh, if they are eating their own dog food wouldn't they already be running Procurve internally? Much better than switching to 3Com, shudder....

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  41. Only an Apple fanboy... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... would find a way to relate this not in any way to Apple.

    Apple simply does not figure in most of the markets where HP moves, while in the other hand HP could encroach into Apple's markets (they compete against each other in all of Apple's computer lines).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  42. "Apple sews up lines in the consumer markets" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile in the real world, Acer is the largest manufacturer of laptops, HP of desktops, and Samsung is a huge consumer electronics company. The US is not longer the majority of the IT goods market. Outside the US, the iPhone is just one of a number of high spec phones. The consumer market has lots of competition and Apple is just one player. Your statement is like saying "BMW sews up lines in the car market". Just because many US geeks prefer BMWs to Mercs doesn't actually mean that BMW is the market leader.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  43. Think about it - - Re:FU HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, not to be taken personally, but *you* weren't laid off, and this could be a smart deal for HP, cheap enough they look like they're buying a customer database and getting the tech, patents etc for free. So, unless you're convinced it's a bum deal, it's probably not bad for HP, and by proxy not destructive to you. We've experienced one heck of a boom lately, and while i understand the sell-off sucks hard if this particular boom started before your working life started, there's a lot of mileage yet in the IT economy. Maybe stop looking at Goldman bonus packages (which are effectively one-time gifts, and may yet be poisoned gifts) and get yourself smartened up. Booms and economic cycles are always exaggerated by human nature. Just position yourself better for the next one. And don't complain when over-hyped cycles are trimmed of casual largesse.

  44. Completely OT by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Would that be because their employer, Mr. Sauron, had a few problems with the authorities? In Terry Pratchett's latest book, there's an indirect swipe at JRRT: there are only a few surviving orcs after the Dark Wars, and (plot spoiler) the authorities are trying to integrate them back into society.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  45. Stop analyzing.. by Sitxu · · Score: 0

    Hp does this for 2 reasons only

    1.- They want to
    2.- They Like to get bigger

    Is is as simple as that after years of working for them we know, and they dont give a shit about people, sad we are nice people.

    --
    cualquier vaina hagase el muerto
  46. 3COM = Patents. HP = Patent Troll? by h.ross.perot · · Score: 1

    3COM = Patents. HP = Patent Troll? Could it happen?

    --
    ... I'll have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster with a side of Plutonium Nyborg ...
  47. Left out Step 2: ?? and Step 3: Profit!! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    You Left out Step 2: ?? and Step 3: Profit!!, but HP may have left those out as well.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  48. it is the wall street again driving this by shakuni · · Score: 1

    People who benefit most from M&As are the wall street fat cat investment bankers. They are always on the prowl for creating marriages where none exist. The Company management usually is a weak defense against the might of these wall streeters, who combine smarts, aggression, money and massive selling skills to unsuspecting and often incompetent management. These guys are masters are discrediting company insiders who know something about the product and market while promoting insiders who spout their line of thinking. I have seen this used by some of the VC sponsored companies that have used these underhanded tactics.

  49. The revenge of the fallen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...it's the ghost of 100VG laughing from it's grave!

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Amanda Seyfried/Julianne More love scene? Check! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    To answer the inevitable question: 3Com, huh?

    3Com made tape, so they got into backup tapes, then hardware and floppies and crap, and never looked back.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  52. Re:Anagrams for hpedscompaquEcomdec by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    (I threw a U in there and replaced 3 with 133t E, and relies on british spelling apparently)

    Cad Copped Moms Cheque
    Comp Mod Spaced Cheque
    Champ Ceded Cop Mosque
    Chap Ceded Comp Mosque
    Mac Cheque Comps Doped
    Camp Coded Cheque Mops
    Camp Comped Cheque Dos
    Sod Comped Camp Cheque
    Pomp Coded Cheque Scam
    Dammed Cop Cops Cheque
    Damp Coed Comps Cheque
    Damp Codes Comp Cheque
    Squad Emceed Comp Chop
    Quad Specced Chemo Mop
    Quad Specced Emo Chomp
    Quad Specced Chop Memo
    Quad Secede Chomp Comp
    Quad Schemed Cope Comp
    Quad Coed Sec Comp Hemp

    http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=hpedscompaquEcomdec&t=1000&a=n

  53. Good news for Cisco, Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... enough said.