Slashdot Mirror


Alternate Star Trek TOS Pilot Found

Raver32 sends news that the lost second pilot for Star Trek has been found, and will be released next month on Blu-ray. "Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series. The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change). The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven. That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired. Apparently, a film collector in Germany acquired the print and 'recently brought it to the attention' of CBS/Paramount. CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15."

134 comments

  1. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wooo first post

    1. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah /. was 503-b0rked

  2. Nice marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This episode has been available at conventions for years. The only thing they "found" was access to the master copies, giving them better quality.

    1. Re:Nice marketing by paganizer · · Score: 1

      How many years? I was a True Blue Full Bore Star Trek geek up until about 1990, and I never heard of it.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Nice marketing by AbRASiON · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nice job being a dick to another slashdotter! You're awesome.

    3. Re:Nice marketing by vlad30 · · Score: 1, Informative
      It was aired as episode 3

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061027/

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    4. Re:Nice marketing by natehoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Where No Man has Gone Before" was in fact aired as Episode 3. You are absolutely correct.

      However, the article states there was an alternate version of "Where No Man has Gone Before" which did not air, but was the version used to sell Trek to NBC execs. That version never aired, and is what is now being offered up on the DVD.

      Technically, most of "The Cage" also aired as part of "The Menagerie".

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:Nice marketing by Inner_Child · · Score: 4, Informative

      The cage has been out for many years now. Is this the cage or is it something completely different. or a different cut of the cage?

      Really? You couldn't even read the summary? Or even comments above yours? It's an alternate version of "Where No Man Has Gone Before".

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    6. Re:Nice marketing by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can't Read The Fine Article, could you at least Read The Fine Summary? This is an *uncut* version of that pilot, containing a great deal of footage that wasn't aired.

    7. Re:Nice marketing by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>It was aired as episode 3

      Yippy. That just means stupid NBC aired the show out of order. I typically watch "Where No Man" as episode 1, and all the other season one episodes in production order. Not only are the set & unform designs more consistent that way, but also the story flows better from episode to episode. (I don't typically watch The Cage because it's not all that great of story, plus it's already covered in The Menagerie Parts 1 and 2, so why watch it twice?)

      Season 1 of Star Trek is also a good bargrain to buy on DVD. You get 29(?) episodes each 51 minutes long, or almost 1500 minutes, whereas today's shows like Stargate Universe barely offer up 840 minutes per season

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Nice marketing by donaggie03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, the summary is a bit confusing. It says there were two pilots, "The Cage" and "Where No Man Has Gone Before." It then says an alternate pilot was found. From just those facts in the summary, does that mean a different cut of "The Cage" or a different cut of "Where No Man Has Gone Before" or a different episode entirely? Also, he was replying to another comment waaay up the page. He wasn't down here to see the "comments above yours."

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    9. Re:Nice marketing by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Where do I find the -1 Dick Mod?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    10. Re:Nice marketing by lennier · · Score: 1

      "Just to fill you in, they have also made other series (Deep Space Nine, LA LA LA, CAN'T HEAR YOU) and many movies."

      NO! There was NOTHING after Deep Space Nine! Nothing! And no Trek movie after Star Trek IV, except for First Contact.

      Man, imagine the Decade from Hell we could've had if Paramount had decided they could just keep cranking out Star Trek material without regard to story quality. Sheesh. Close call there.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    11. Re:Nice marketing by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      Whaat? Star Trek VI is far superior to Star Trek IV, which is nothing but a glorified Disney film!

      I however agree with all your other statements.

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    12. Re:Nice marketing by paganizer · · Score: 1

      huh?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  3. WOW by Higaran · · Score: 1

    I thought I knew almost all of the major things about TOS, but I never heard about this. It sounds interisting and I wonder what it looks like, will the update the graphics or leave it just like it was? I can't wait.

    1. Re:WOW by aplusjimages · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man I just hope this original story keeps with the canon of the Star Trek Universe.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    2. Re:WOW by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this alternate cut, Spock uses Red Matter to go back and kick his younger more emotional self in the nuts and state "You're not a fucking Martian, Roddenberry is out to lunch."

      As well, Scotty's weird wrench sex fetish is finally fully explained, the final great mystery of Star Trek after Patrick Stewart revealed Picard's affinity for Klingon circle jerks.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. Good God!!! by FloydTheDroid · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the equivalent of ringing a bell at Pavlov's dogs!

    1. Re:Good God!!! by Jezza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you mean Chekov's Dogs?

      No wait ... that isn't right.

    2. Re:Good God!!! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean Chekov's Dogs?

      No, Pavlov. You know, the researcher who developed an obsession to ring bells whenever he saw a dog salivating.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:Good God!!! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It's Checkov's Cats,,,

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Good God!!! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Pavlov had dogs, Chekov had a gun.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Good God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    6. Re:Good God!!! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I think said whoosh was right over your head. Read my post again.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    7. Re:Good God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to explain.... oh never mind.

    8. Re:Good God!!! by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      The Duke had a Gun. Chekov had a PHASER.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    9. Re:Good God!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> Don't you mean Chekov's Dogs?

      > No, Pavlov. You know, the researcher who developed an obsession to ring bells whenever he saw a dog salivating.

      Chekov did a different experiment with dogs. He'd ring a bell when they failed to get a joke.

    10. Re:Good God!!! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      No Checkov had nuclear wessels.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:Good God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can only assume you're referring to yourself. Reread what you replied to.

    12. Re:Good God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, psychology jokes...

    13. Re:Good God!!! by jd · · Score: 1

      You mean, if you fail to get a joke, an angel gets its wings? God, they must be a depressing lot.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    14. Re:Good God!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      You mean, if you fail to get a joke, an angel gets its wings? God, they must be a depressing lot.

      Nah, I'm sure there's no such thing as an angel without wings ever since the Tea Party people showed up.

    15. Re:Good God!!! by jd · · Score: 1

      I thought the tea party folk only bothered the dormice with wings and the occasional mad hatter.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    16. Re:Good God!!! by Jezza · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the one that needed to be fired before the end of the second act aren't you?

  5. zomg it's trek by florin · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other less important news, a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments was excavated in the Iraqi desert today.

    1. Re:zomg it's trek by denzacar · · Score: 1

      a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments was excavated in the Iraqi desert today

      So what?
      You'll find more tablets on any stoner. No need to go to Iraq for that. Or the condiments.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:zomg it's trek by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments

      And #11 was "Thous shalt not listen to so-called "religious leaders""

      Number 1 was supposed to be "Thou shalt read all instructions before beginning" and #15 was "Thous shalt ignore #2-14"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:zomg it's trek by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Sooooooo... they should ignore that about not listening to religious leaders, and follow them blindly? I think they got that covered already.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:zomg it's trek by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      Thou shalt not examine this tablet too closely.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    5. Re:zomg it's trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making #11 moot.

    6. Re:zomg it's trek by youngone · · Score: 1

      Yes, and here are a few of them: Thou shalt not brandish an Uzi while driving behind an old person. Thou shalt not compose limericks at a funeral. Thou shalt not teleport within sight of technologically-inferior species. Thou shalt not use the "X word." Thou shalt not say "groady". Thou shalt not fast-forward through the commercials. It's not a great idea to teach 'em to bark, either... Thou shalt not teach a ferret to yodel. Thou shalt not have misplaced priorities. Thou shalt not align yourself with the dark side of the force. Thou shalt not freeze-frame to look up Jessica Rabbitt's dress. Thou shalt not buy stuff made in sweat shops unless it's really trendy and just to die for. I can't claim them, they're from here: http://www.mindworkshop.com/alchemy/command.html

    7. Re:zomg it's trek by DrCode · · Score: 2, Funny

      #12: Thou shalt not use goto's in they code.

  6. alternate universe by rossdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    do they have goatees?

    1. Re:alternate universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have goatse. No wonder nobody's seen this until now.

    2. Re:alternate universe by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      do they have goatees?

      See, now that's funny.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:alternate universe by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No. But goatses!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  7. Typical.. by Bentov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'too cerebral' the phrase of death for way too many shows....Come on now, we can't let the sheeple start thinking about more than sports, reality tv and porn...ok, the porn is ok, but please more than sport and reality tv.

    1. Re:Typical.. by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      With sufficient education (and bananas onna stick), any monkey can be George Orwell...

    2. Re:Typical.. by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      That's the one of the best sayings I have heared in years! :-o

      --
      Here be signatures
    3. Re:Typical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I am surprised that "Bones", the television series not the doctor on the original Star Trek, made it to air. The show has a lot of scientifically valid material. Come to think of it so did "Numb3rs" until near the end of the series.

  8. Its Life Jim by ijakings · · Score: 1

    Its Life Jim, but not as you know it.

  9. Another alternate universe? by MrKaos · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All this messing with the time lines gives me a headache.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Another alternate universe? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      All this messing with the time lines gives me a headache.

      So no-one recognised the Janeway reference, eh?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Another alternate universe? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I did FWIW. I liked how the temporal police gave her hell, something like "Not since that renegade James Tiberius Kirk have we seen such flagrant disregard for the temporal directive!", which made it even more funny in that she ended the series by "cheating" her way through time with stolen Klingon tech and giving her past self a whole buttload of kick ass anti-borg hardware. Pretty much the rules went out the window with her by the end.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Another alternate universe? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I did FWIW.

      And they call themselves Star Trek fans??? - I'm glad someone got the joke - cheers!!!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  10. Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted by ThreeGigs · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15"

    Only Blu-ray? I predict a spike in Blu-ray sales that's higher than expected for Christmas.

    Either that or new records will be set for the most downloaded pirated TV show.

    1. Re:Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you have old, grainy, low-quality footage, there is no other way to release it other than Blu-Ray!

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if it's on film, it's probably higher quality than anything on Blu-Ray (and you will still be able to get the codec 100 years from now). Hollywood prefers to archive on film because every time the EIA comes out with a new medium, it can be down-converted from film at the latest "highest quality evarrr!". All you need to read film is a light and a lens; you can't say that about 8" floppy, 5-1/4" floppy, 3-1/2" floppy, Zip, Jaz, Bernoulli, tapes, CD, DVD, or even Blu-Ray. Film: the medium of the future.

    3. Re:Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      All you need to read film is a light and a lens; you can't say that about 8" floppy, 5-1/4" floppy, 3-1/2" floppy, Zip, Jaz, Bernoulli, tapes, CD, DVD, or even Blu-Ray

      OK, I'll give you light and a lens, but if we are allowed to use several lenses, then all you need are light and lenses to read a CD. The pit size is within the resolving power of optical microscopes.

    4. Re:Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have old, grainy, low-quality footage, there is no other way to release it other than Blu-Ray!

      That was my thought, exactly. Even on lower quality DVD, you can see every pore, as well as the makeup Shatner and Nimoy are wearing.

  11. Its not you its me by Ada_Rules · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sure there are some shows that were killed for being 'too cerebral' where it was true, but plenty of shows that received the ax with that phrase had a slightly different underlying problem. They were too f*ing boring.

    'Too cerebral' allows the network to break it off without hurting the feelings of the fans or the producers. It will be interesting to see which category this pilot falls into...Maybe if it does not turn out well the pilot and I can just be friends.

    --
    --- Liberty in our Lifetime
    1. Re:Its not you its me by Bentov · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I wouldn't think that the network would care if it hurt the feelings of fans or producers; but I think your correct. Two shows come to mind off the top of my head: Threshold(ok, I just love Gina Gugino) and Surface. Oh, and also Eerie, Indiana I believe as well. Although I don't know if Eerie was too cerebral, I just think that kids have no taste :)

    2. Re:Its not you its me by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Too many other shows just completly change tack mid-series.
      Like Jericho where it devolved and all the conspiracy theory stuff (Who just blew up half the world with nukes? Who is trying to stop the main characters finding out more? etc) went away to be replaced with a more character-driven show.
      Or Prison Break where all the stuff about the reasons behind why that guy was framed and sent to jail were never explored.

    3. Re:Its not you its me by earlymon · · Score: 1

      'Too cerebral' allows the network to break it off without hurting the feelings of the fans or the producers.

      Seriously - you believe the phrase "it's not you, it's me" ever spared anyone's feelings? It's always sounded like the most sarcastic form of "it's not me, it's you" - a point grasped much earlier in the conversation.

      Or that at the admonition that the Cage was "too cerebral" was met with any phrase besides "what the fuck....?"

      I do appreciate you're explaining the motivation for those phrases, though - no sarcasm, no kidding. Prior to this, I simply attributed their use to stupid people.

      Maybe if it does not turn out well the pilot and I can just be friends.

      Well, if that happens, at least the pilot won't be the kind of friend that stopped sleeping with you and had already bad-mouthed you to anyone you did want to sleep with.

      And - isn't that what TV is really all about? (rotfl)

      Cheers.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    4. Re:Its not you its me by hson · · Score: 2

      Seriously - you believe the phrase "it's not you, it's me" ever spared anyone's feelings?

      It's not you, it's me. I don't like you!
      I find that statement a lot more honest (and funny),

    5. Re:Its not you its me by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      That's Carla Gugino, famously of Sin City and the mother in the Spy Kids films; also wife of Sebastian Guitierrez, writer of Snakes on a Plane.

      Threshold, really? What is it with Brannon Braga and transhuman genetic hybrids?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    6. Re:Its not you its me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously - you believe the phrase "it's not you, it's me" ever spared anyone's feelings? It's always sounded like the most sarcastic form of "it's not me, it's you" - a point grasped much earlier in the conversation.

      Or that at the admonition that the Cage was "too cerebral" was met with any phrase besides "what the fuck....?"

      I do appreciate you're explaining the motivation for those phrases, though - no sarcasm, no kidding. Prior to this, I simply attributed their use to stupid people.

      Well, I can explain a little better since you're still missing part of the point.

      In business, polite brush-offs of this sort mean: I didn't like what you're pitching, but it's nothing personal, so if you have something new come back and talk to me again.

      Blatant insults mean: I don't like the product, and I am so skeptical of your ability to ever produce something worth my time that I don't care if I become the last person you'll ever make an offer to.

      So, yeah, "too cerebral" is a much better rejection than anything else--it's rejecting the pilot instead of the producer. And, whatever people in the business think, fans sure seem to eat that sort of thing up when news leaks about the "reason" a show barely got made. In a way that "almost not picked up because it was too boring" doesn't

    7. Re:Its not you its me by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      'Sure there are some shows that were killed for being 'too cerebral''

      Yes, like television news reporting being changed to entertainment.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    8. Re:Its not you its me by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      In the case of Threashold it wasn't the show being too cerebral it was the writing being too atrocious. The show had little in the way of internal consistency ("We can't turn off the subway's power! It's too disruptive! I say this even though last week we happily EMP'd downtown!" Also, one episode requiring a SOTA sound processor to reproduce The Signal while another had an MP3 of an answering machine copy be equally effective), the science was so bad even laypersons could easily tell (the SOTA sound processor got faster the more current you applied to it) and some of the episodes simply made no sense (like a plank of wood that was exposed to The Signal somehow also transforming people).

      I watched all of it because I like trash and it was to mystery shows what Troma is to cinema. Except that Troma is honest about their quality.


      Eerie, Indiana was pretty cool, though.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Its not you its me by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Seriously, have you ever seen Sapphire and Steel? Did you understand what the holy hell was going on in that series?

    10. Re:Its not you its me by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I was missing the point. I think I've got it now.

      I do a lot of business deals, high money - just don't see the need for this nit-nit-nit-nit.

      But, maybe that's just me.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  12. Ge the torrent: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Ge the torrent: by ktappe · · Score: 1

      No, that's a link to a torrent of "The Cage", not "Where No Man Has Gone Before."

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  13. Re: old, grainy, low-quality footage by MRe_nl · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, the quality isn't that bad...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=yN_KeOiXMPE

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  14. Star Trek Act I...Warp II... by rirugrat · · Score: 4, Funny
    Star Trek...In Color!

    Starring Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln.

  15. Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatner?? by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Funny

    What are you going to do? Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him? I got news for you
    pal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  16. It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stardate 5191.5.

    While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women, have come across a place called "the pirate bay". Apparently this is an exchange post for all kinds of illicit material, but based on an analysis of the comments, quite inexplicably, it is only frequented by pre-pubescent teenage boys and social misfits who lack a fundamental part of the anatomy: a sense of humour.

    Recommend we study these life forms to learn what we can from them. They seem to have formed a lawless society loosely based on an earlier society that advocated rape and pilleage on the high seas . Furthermore they have technology that allows them to store an infinite number of files on a loose connection of inter-0networked machines, but strangely none of these files are complete, which often results in cursing and requests to perform a strange ritual invoked with the words "please seed".

    To guard against their natural enemies - a group who have become rich and successful by making entertainment audio and video recordings for a completely different group of pre-pubescent teenagers - they use a new kind of anti-mater which they call "peer guardian".

    Mr Spock believes they are "fascinating" and I am hopeful we will soon encounter green alien dancing girls with 3 breasts. I have therefore committed all resources of the Enterprise to cataloging and studing this group.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Chode? Is that you?

    2. Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stardate 5191.5. While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women

      Clearly this is TOS, in TNG you'd just say "Computer, list all pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women." Not surprising that it's Google delivering that amazingly context-sensitive half mind-reading search assistant though, the way they're going it's either that or Skynet.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, in TNG you'd say "Computer, create simulation of green three breasted alien woman on holodeck 9. Run program extra slutty-1." After first kicking out Ensign Barclay, of course.

    4. Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it by HBoar · · Score: 1

      No, must be pre TOS. In TOS, you'd give the computer any vague, ambiguous vocal command, so long as it was preceded by "Computer:" and followed by "Compute".

  17. I hereby tag this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    swine, profiteering.

    Because you can bet your butts that this single episode will first be sold for the price of a full movie. Then it will be sold in an "exclusive collector's edition" package for twice the price of a full movie. Then it will be sold again in an "exclusive collector's edition" package bundled with a lame, arbitrary Star Trek-related 2-cent gadget made in China, and/or a 10 minute interview with someone from the cast, for thrice the price of a full movie.

    I'll just wait until it lands on . F**k you.

    1. Re:I hereby tag this: by pthisis · · Score: 3, Informative

      you can bet your butts that this single episode will first be sold for the price of a full movie.

      According to TFA, the episode will be included as part of the bonus material for the season 3 release on blu-ray:

      "The restored pilot will be included in the "Star Trek: Original Series - Season 3" Blu-ray release.."

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  18. They leave the galaxy? by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the clips on youtube linked in the article, it says they leave the milky way - that would be a huge departure from the current canon, in which they have never left he galazy under their own power, in any series or movie.

    1. Re:They leave the galaxy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      From the clips on youtube linked in the article, it says they leave the milky way - that would be a huge departure from the current canon, in which they have never left he galazy under their own power, in any series or movie.

      Actually in the aired version they leave the galaxy. That was the barrier they crossed. Much like the Bible Star Trek did have it's inconsistencies. I believe they do make mention of it in "By Any Other Name" but I haven't seen most of the original show in 20+ years. They may cut the references in TV versions for extra commercial time so it may only show in DVD versions. In "Where No Man Has Gone Before" it's the central theme as in the place man hasn't gone before.

    2. Re:They leave the galaxy? by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I watched "By Any Other Name" last night and they certainly did leave the milky way, crossing the "galactic barrier" in the process. Also they do enter the barrier in "Is there no Truth in Beauty," but by then it's a little more casual and no one gets godlike powers in the process.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:They leave the galaxy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only they did leave the "galazy" in that episode where the Enterprise is hijacked. Despite that you get mooded Informative? God I love this place.

    4. Re:They leave the galaxy? by caseih · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, no. In the original airing of this episode they did in fact leave the galaxy. And that's not the only time either. Also in "By any other Name" the Kelvins take the enterprise at "warp 11" through the barrier and into the void.

      So yes, in the "canon" they have absolutely left the galaxy on two occasions. What kind of trekkie are you! :)

    5. Re:They leave the galaxy? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least Kirk doesn't get magical powers and befriends Lucifer like in TAS.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:They leave the galaxy? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      What part of "under their own power" is not clear here?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    7. Re:They leave the galaxy? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      In addition to what other people have said, it also happens in TNG's "Where No One Has Gone Before".

      (That being said, that was one of the worst episodes in a pretty terrible season (I say that as a big fan of TNG too), so forgetting it is entirely understandable.)

    8. Re:They leave the galaxy? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you not watched "Where No Man Has Gone Before"? Jesus christ, the entire plot is centered around them deliberately flying through the galactic barrier in order to find a lost ship.

    9. Re:They leave the galaxy? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Much like the Bible Star Trek did have it's inconsistencies.

      Nonsense, and I find that very offensive. If you think there are inconsistencies in Star Trek, you clearly haven't watched it carefully enough. While I'm sure you may think you have found an inconsistency or contradiction in the canon, you have to bear in mind multiple alternate and mirror universes, extra adventures between episodes that were not screened, the literary agent hypothesis, and the limitations of 1960s television as a medium. To so bluntly declare Trek inconsistent is an insult to millions of faithful Trekkers worldwide, and is criminal hate speech.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:They leave the galaxy? by skeeto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There have been a few mistakes made, but nothing terribly important. The ones I know of can possibly be attributed to character confusion. For example, there was that TNG episode where they find Scotty trapped in a transporter buffer after an accident. When they free him he believes that Kirk has brought the Enterprise to come rescue him. However, Scotty had already witnessed what was believed to be Kirk's death in Star Trek: Generations, so Scotty should believe Kirk to be dead at that time.

      But nowhere near as inconsistent as the bible, with its multiple, incompatible creation myths. :-)

  19. Far from new or unseen by earlymon · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're a fan of the ST TOS, go look at the embedded clip in the TFA - you've seen this episode.

    As one commenter at the TFA stated: "Different music, graphics, some additional dialogue."

    It was a great episode - Sally Kellerman (babe alert) and Gary Lockwood - where the eyes turn silver and mental powers abound.

    http://www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/star-trek-the-original-series/3461344488-star-trek-where-no-man-has-gone-before

    Season 1, episode 3.

    See also - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_No_Man_Has_Gone_Before

    So - that was the alternate pilot. I did not know that. Very cool.

    I mention all this for those us not on the Blu-ray bandwagon who will have to wait for this one.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    1. Re:Far from new or unseen by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Doh - I've duplicated info posted an hour earlier - this is what happens when you start to post and then stop to watch stuff!!!

      http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1444120&cid=30105058

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  20. Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    No, Shatner (Captain Kirk) was the one who replaced Jeffrey Hunter (Captain Pike).

    The main thing that I remember about the original pilot was that Spock yelled a lot. I guess this was filmed before they had electronic microphones.

  21. Summary makes it seem like there is 3 pilots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice, confusing summary.
     

    Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series. The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change). The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven. That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired.

    So is this the first, rejected pilot ("The Cage") or an alternate version of the second, accepted pilot?

  22. In an alternative time line by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It was the one aired..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. My favorite part of the clip: by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 4, Funny

    "George Takei as Chief Physicist"

    Helmsman, swordsman, physicist... the guy can do everything!

    1. Re:My favorite part of the clip: by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Helmsman, swordsman, physicist... the guy can do everything!"

      Except girls.

      Don't care...just sayin'.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:My favorite part of the clip: by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Actually the character Sulu wasn't gay (he had a wife and kids, in the animated series when he was in "hell" he got magical powers and could make anything he want appear, so he made a hot babe appear". the actor who portrayed Sulu was, You know there is a difference between the two.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:My favorite part of the clip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk did loads of green chicks, and yet he's totes gay for Spock. Why should Sulu's wife and

    4. Re:My favorite part of the clip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between "can" and "doesn't want to."

  24. This is the first time... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    ... That my facial expression has matched that of the fake alien thingy whenever it's been used as an article icon. 8-o

    Should be interesting to see!

  25. Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne by shadowknot · · Score: 1

    No, Shatner (Captain Kirk) was the one who replaced Jeffrey Hunter (Captain Pike).

    The main thing that I remember about the original pilot was that Spock yelled a lot. I guess this was filmed before they had electronic microphones.

    Or figured out the nuances of the Vulcan psyche.

  26. Sounds like true Star Trek alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The USS Enterprise, under the command of Captain Christopher Pike, receives a radio distress call from the fourth planet in the Talos star group. A landing party is assembled and beamed down to investigate. Tracking the distress signal to its source, the landing party discovers a camp of survivors from a scientific expedition that has been missing for 18 years. Among the survivors is a beautiful young woman named Vina.

    Captivated by her beauty, Pike is caught off guard and is captured by the Talosians, a race of humanoids with bulbous heads who live beneath the planet's surface. It is revealed that the distress call, and the crash survivors, except for Vina, are just illusions created by the Talosians to lure the Enterprise to the planet. While imprisoned, Pike uncovers the Talosian's plans to repopulate their ravaged planet using himself and Vina as breeding stock for a race of slaves."

    Yep, quality TOS here.

    1. Re:Sounds like true Star Trek alright by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      That sounds like The Cage, the other pilot.

  27. What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray? by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    The resolution is what? 1/6 of Blu Ray HD. What point could there possibly be to releasing any legacy TV on Blu Ray?

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  28. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by dianebrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    not so, this is old TV that was on film, that film has a higher theoretical resolution.
    had this been old TV on video tape, that would be different.

  29. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Maybe the spend the extra bits on reducing fringing and/or increased color depth? BluRay is still a little weak in those areas.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  30. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the film that they used is higher resolution than HD.

  31. Blu-Ray you say? by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about DVD? Oh those of us who don't own or wanna waste money on the next "best" in spinning disk technology gonna have to wait? I guess I'll just have to download it the day it comes out.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Blu-Ray you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Movies are a privilege. They are not a right. People like you should be slaughtered.

  32. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Judge the 1080p screenshots for yourself.

    Personally, I think bluray, as a technology, is a little hyperactive.

    Here's a portion of bluray box copy for No country for Old Men.

    ...Featuring an acclaimed cast led by Tommy Lee Jones, this stunning game of cat and mouse is even grittier in flawless 1080p. Each heart stopping frame delivers maximum punch as 24 bit uncompressed audio and the unbridled strength of Blu ray High Definition take you to edge of your seat and beyond

    Stunning? I wonder if that's a reference to Javier Bardem's weapon of choice.

  33. Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, scientifically, we rather move in the hairless direction. The idea is, that there is no need for it anymore, anyway.

    No Picard really is a rather advanced specimen. ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  34. Sigh by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you're going to do a first post on an article like this, you could at least do it right and say something like

    I'm Captain Kirk! I'M CAPTAIN KIIIRRK!

  35. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the film that they used is higher resolution than HD.

    That's true, but people forget that the production values will have been made with television in mind- and 1960s televisions at that. In other words, at high enough resolution you might (for example) be able to see the obvious limitations and crudeness of props that would have been less apparent at ordinary TV resolution.

    Just because the source material was recorded at a high enough resolution, doesn't mean it was filmed with that in mind. Given the budgets of TV shows, they wouldn't have wasted money on extra detail that wouldn't have shown up on televisions of the time; but the lack of it will show if scanned at high enough resolution and shown on modern HD sets.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  36. Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne by hodma727 · · Score: 1

    What are you going to do? Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him? I got news for you pal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!

    Cured? Sorry hairy one, but in the future your children (should you procreate through some devious means) will all be bald in order to ensure their massive genetically engineered brains can dissipate the extra heat. Politicians will still do so by keeping their mouths open - just like dogs. Us "baldies" are just preparing in advance.

  37. Oblig. Red Dwarf by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Newscaster: "Archeologists near Mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated on Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read: 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.'"

  38. karma's a bitch, eh NBC? by Blue+Shifted · · Score: 1

    >>

    was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral'

    and now NBC in in fourth place, being bought by a cable company....

    that's what they get for messing with star trek

  39. Goody gumdrops! by Cur8or · · Score: 0

    A Star Trek story on /. Great way to start the week!

    --
    Winkey shortcut mapping for 64bit windows. WinKeyPlus
  40. The 3rd pilot by Antiocheian · · Score: 0

    Here is an excerpt from the discussion on the article:

    "Mind you there are differences such as Spock is not the 1st officer he's the second officer while Majel Barret played the 1st officer. In the remake of this 2nd pilot she was moved to the position of nurse Chapel. As other have said the music is different and the show is separated into sections land labelled as acts."

    Capiche?

    But there is in fact a 3rd pilot. Here it is: http://www.shatnerology.com/video.html

  41. "Hornblower Meets Robby"? by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    I thought "Forbidden Planet" (after leavening with Horatio Hornblower) was the pilot for ST:TOS?

    Though Spock beats Robby like a drum.

  42. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    Scotty, what's going on with the viewscreen?

    It's breaking up Cap'n.

    Do what you can to hold it together, Mr. Scott! Bones, give him a hand.

    Damn it Jim, I'm a Doctor, not an avid media composer!

    Spock, what can we do?

    We can try routing transporters through the ship's phasers while accelerating to warp speed. Thereby causing a blue shift and broadcasting our image over the heads of our audience.

    Can we skip the phasers and just use the transporter?

    That wouldn't be logical Captain.

    Scotty, I want every available man working on Spock's "blu ray" plan in time for release of the third season.

    Aye Aye captain.

  43. What Cuts? by sanman2 · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, what kind of footage is available in the uncut version that isn't available in the episode 3 version? I remember watching that episode 3 with Kirk's friend Gary Mitchell turning superhuman, and I'm curious as to what additional footage the uncut version has.

    1. Re:What Cuts? by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      The uncut verion has approximately 5 additional minutes of footage. From wikipedia (whose source is The Star Trek Compendium):

      Post-production finished in January 1966, and the episode was presented to NBC for approval; that version differed from the final broadcast cut in that each of the four acts had on-screen titles ("Act I," "Act II," etc.), as well as an epilogue, in the manner of Quinn Martin's television productions. It also featured a much longer opening narration by Shatner. In total almost 5 minutes of additional footage was removed to accommodate the original series 50 minute network broadcast format, allowing for commercials.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  44. "Replaced the actor who played the captain..." by Dadoo · · Score: 1

    It's probably too late to post this, but seriously? This is Slashdot. Half the people here are trekkers, and you couldn't name Jeffrey Hunter? While I'll admit he wasn't at the same level as, say, Jack Nicholson or Al Pacino, he was certainly on par with people like James Garner or Clint Eastwood - or at least he would have been, had he not died young.

    Honestly, I'd bet almost all of you can name the actress who played the green chick, in "Whom Gods Destroy". At least Hunter could act, which is more than you can say for William Shatner.

    --
    Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  45. Blu-ray is the next CD format by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    By this I do not mean you need a rewinder with DVDs, I mean that there will be no reason to move to another format for movies-- because BluRay has as good as quality as anybody needs. Yes it's had a rough start and there are some issues, but I can positively say there is no reason we'd ever need to go on from BluRay-- 1080P, as many audio channels at lossless quality as you want, etc. The studios won't risk it, just like they won't risk supplanting the CD-audio format now.

  46. Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray by sowth · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I bought the DVDs to Gilligan's Island a while back, and...well I am quite glad I do not have the bluray version! Sunburned skin, caked on makeup, and the women didn't look very good either. Ruined my memory of the series.

    BTW, are they releasing it bluray only? I wonder if Hollywood will start bluray only releases. I, for one, don't plan on buying anything which will play that format at all. Oh well, I probably shouldn't give those scumbags more money anyway...