Slashdot Mirror


Best PC DVR Software, For Any Platform?

jshamacher writes "I've used MythTV for several years (first on Slackware, now via Mythbuntu) and it's good. But not great — I have a list of annoyances as long as my arm. For example, even 0.22 still has problems playing many DVDs and I frequently have to fall back on Xine. Since upgrading to new hardware, I've had issues with sound dropping out; these problems only occur for Myth, not for anything else. So now I'm trying out alternatives. Freevo seemed promising when I tried it a few months ago but it had its own issues. I'm also increasingly getting pressure from my family to get things like NetFlix streaming working on this machine. This seems to imply migrating to a Windows-based solution. I threw XP on it and tried MediaPortal but could never get that to control my Motorola cable box via the IR blaster. So my questions to you: What DVR software do you use? Are you happy with it? What don't you like? Are there any packages out there that 'just work' as media hubs and for time-shifting cable TV?"

67 of 536 comments (clear)

  1. Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was looking at making a media center box a while back I was looking at Snapstream which is Windows based software that seemed to support a lot of the Happague DVR cards and remotes. Since then I decided I didn't need the actual DVR function as much as just a box to stream SD videos from my PC to my TV so I took my old XBox and softmodded it to XBMC.

    1. Re:Snapstream? by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've tried many different solutions, and there is only one that "just works": Media Center. I know it's Microsoft and all, but the thing works. It doesn't do half of what MythTV is all about, but it just works. And with a careful set of codecs you can read pretty much anything.

    2. Re:Snapstream? by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, My Movies 3 is probably the best thing since sliced bread for playing movies.

      To be fair, sliced bread didn't help much for movies.

    3. Re:Snapstream? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have to agree. Over the years I tried Myth, Mediaportal, XBMC, several different freeware TV capture packages, and I never could seem to find anything that "just worked" hassle free until I switched to Windows 7 HP x64. The windows 7 Media Center paired with an ATI HD600 USB I picked up for $20 on Woot! just works beautifully. Schedules, recording, it is all just nice.

      So if this guy is wanting an 'easy peasy" solution I would have to go with Windows 7 Media Center. Just pick up the upgrade version, do a clean install, and he'll be good to go. The only thing he'll have to worry about is if he has some old funky off brand TV card it might not have Windows 7 drivers. That is what I ran into with my old EasyTV FM card, but if you keep your eyes out capture devices can be had for pretty cheap. Better to spend a little money and have a solid eay to use PVR VS going cheap and spending all your time fixing it, at least IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Snapstream? by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean, My Movies 3 is probably the best thing since sliced bread for playing movies.

      To be fair, sliced bread didn't help much for movies.

      Didn't hurt this movie: Love Is a Slice of Bread

      --
      John
  2. Linux MCE by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only just started fiddling with it, but it looks incredible. Always find it odd it doesn't get more mention when these topics arise.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Linux MCE by Ynot_82 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linux MCE is an integrated bundle of software.
      The PVR part is MythTV, so may be be what the OP is looking for

      I personally love Myth, and wouldn't change it for anything
      but saying that, I use it as a media front-end only (no broadcast TV)

    2. Re:Linux MCE by EndingPop · · Score: 3, Informative

      LinuxMCE uses MythTV for DVR functionality. It does use Xine/Mplayer for DVD playback. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinuxMCE#Software_components

      --
      My Company - Red Cedar Technology
    3. Re:Linux MCE by nametaken · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This doesn't solve the Netflix issue. Netflix is in bed with Microsoft and delivers using Silverlight 2.

      It doesn't make any kind of sense that a business would deploy any solution using Silverlight, but whatever. I've whined about this before and obviously Netflix doesn't care.

    4. Re:Linux MCE by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Netflix also works on the PS3 system by Sony. My brother rents Netflix and they let him see movies on his PS3 via an App he downloaded for it.

      Novell Moonlight does work as a Silverlight plug-in for non-Windows operating systems like Linux, etc. Some people want to boycott Novell because they licensed Microsoft technology but when you need C# and Visual BASIC.Net for Linux, *BSD Unix, and Mac OSX they got you covered with Mono, and Moonlight for Silverlight support. I compare Silverlight to Shockwave Flash, just another virtual machine system and they both kind of do the same things.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Moonlight does not support DRM, MS refuses to let them and both it and the mac version are falling behind.

      Silverlight is a fucking trap!

    6. Re:Linux MCE by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The poster needs to forget using a PC for Netflix. The video quality streamed to the PC is VASTLY inferior to what gets streamed to the Roku. Being able to steam to your computer is great on a 17"-22" monitor, but once you start getting up to living room TV sizes, you can really see the lower quality.

    7. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not once they go to silverlight 3.That adds lots of "features" that only work on windows.

    8. Re:Linux MCE by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I hooked my PC and my ROKU to my 50" Plasma via HDMI. The difference was night and day. The PC was almost unwatchable. I certainly would not have shown it to anyone as a way to convice them that Netflix streaming was worth while. It looked like it came off of a VHS tape. The ROKU produced a better picture than my satallite. To be fair, my satillite is SD, but there was no question about the huge difference in picture quality.

    9. Re:Linux MCE by Scyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      Netflix's HD streams (720p) are only available to devices and not to computers. Roku, XBox 360, PS3, & some TVs and BluRay players all have access to the netflix HD streams, while the PC do not. Not all content is available in HD (it is a subset of their already limit streaming library), but when its there, it is pretty nice. The HD streams are pretty common for newer TV shows too.

    10. Re:Linux MCE by majid_aldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      THAT SUCKS!!!

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  3. VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just make sure you get the clock set first

    1. Re:VCR by cyberstealth1024 · · Score: 3, Funny

      for me, this is moot, because the only show i record on my vcr is at 12:00 am!

  4. SageTV on XP by FormulaTroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Sage TV (http://www.sage.tv/) on XP (If you're going to end up going that route anyways). It's been pretty reliable and I like the interface. I've also considered moving to Windows 7. I hear the media center functionality built in is pretty robust.

    1. Re:SageTV on XP by jvbunte · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to swear by SageTV up and down. I was a very early adopter of this software and was promised "Free Upgrades" when I originally purchased it. Apparently "Free Upgrades" only applied until version 5.0+ was released, then it started costing money for every major revision.

      It's still good software, however I have a problem with advertising "Free Upgrades" and then skipping out on that claim. I stopped using them on that alone. (Don't lecture me on how they need to get paid for their work, I get that. Don't advertise "free upgrades" if you aren't going to follow up with that claim.)

      I have since moved to XBMC http://xbmc.org/ running on an ASRock ION 330 plugged straight into my home theater receiver and it plays 1080p pretty well, 720p flawlessly. The only drawback of XBMC is that it doesn't record (it was never meant to). Its playback capabilities are unmatched in my opinion (mplayer backend, if mplayer can play it, so can xbmc). It's crazy easy to install and use. I use the genuine Microsoft MCE usb remote control which is supported out of the box with no special LIRC knowledge.

      I use MythTV with a Hauppage HD-PVR back end for video recording, and although I believe there is a MythTV FrontEnd addon for XBMC, I simply share my recordings directory via CIFS and let XBMC mount the share directly for playback. I like the seperate MythTV backend because I have two XBMC/ASRock installations and both can then read from the same source for playback in either room.

      XBMC: Free (Please Donate, its really that awesome)
      MythTV: Free (Please Donate, its really that awesome)
      ASRock ION 330: About $350 on newegg
      Hauppage HD-PVR: About $200 on newegg

      --
      I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
    2. Re:SageTV on XP by RedR · · Score: 5, Informative

      I too have to give SageTV a big thumbs up. I've had it in place for over 5 years now and its been awesome!! I have it running on my main TV with a dedicated box and 5 tuners. It serves two bedroom TV's via a media extender product (via wired network tho wireless is supported too) as well 3 PC's in the house. It supports SD HD DVD (DVD "backups") and quite a bit more. Has support for music, weather and assorted other features that can be added via community packages. It does support changing the channel on STB (Set Top Boxes), as well support having more than one STB. I currently have one using the IRBlaster, and one using USB->Serial. This setup was fairly quick but did require some research on their forums. It is hands on though, and if you want to use any community packages you'll be reading the forums on how-to's. Again mine has been in place for 5+ years, with little effort since then to add new features, or make minor adjustments to storage locations, and setups for it. It uses Java and again for a "stable" production system, I've held back on any automatic updates to the main system. In short, I let the world test out the updates for a week or few before updating my main SageTV box with Windows or Java updates. While you are at it, take a look at GBPVR http://gbpvr.com/ Its FREE, so hard not to have a look. It does support many if not all features that SageTV has, including IRBlaster/USB->Serial to control a STB. My only issue with it 5 years ago was it didn't have as many features as SageTV, including ones I needed at the time. But again, it was and is FREE, so it is well worth checking out.

    3. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, I too have to give SageTV a big thumbs up.

      A couple of advantages I see with it over the competitor's:
      1) A very open platform that allows mod's to change the UI or add additional functionality (such as on screen caller ID or auto-commercial skip), and a very active modding community.

      2) Runs on Linux, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows Home Server

      3) Has placeshifter functionality that allows you to watch your recorded shows over the web

      4) Has SD or HD hardware extenders that allow you to extend the interface to anywhere you can get ethernet. This includes the whole interface (including mods if desired) so you can schedule TV and/or watch live TV from any extenders

      5) Free built-in access to EPG data in North America.

      6) Built in ability to play ripped DVD's or ripped Blu-Ray's on the HD extender

      Now the downsides...
      1) Many find the built-in interface is ugly. Personally I prefer function over form, so with a very few tweaks, I find it ok.

      2) Closed source.

      3) Proprietary development technology for mods. It includes it's own development studio (I believe it's Eclipse based) for building mods. It apparently can load/run java code, but I've never gotten too far into the modding side of it.

      4) Somewhat complex setup. If you want to use all the bells/whistles, you need to invest some time to figure out how to set things up.

      All that being said, I love it. Overall it's the best value I've ever gotten for a piece of software.

  5. EyeTV by drrck · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have a Mac, Elgato's EyeTV product keeps getting better and better with each release. There are open source add-ons for commercial skipping, exports to iTunes/iPod, ect and the interface is pretty user friendly. It won't do Netflix by itself, but if you're hooking up a media PC then you've already got access to Netflix.

    1. Re:EyeTV by sl3xd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll also throw in with EyeTV. But, the thing to remember with EyeTV is that everything centers around TV:
      * TV Broadcasts
      * Output(s) from TV tuners (Sattelite/Cable) - and you would want an IR blaster for channel changing

      EyeTV does not play DVD's, or any other media other than that which is recorded by EyeTV.

      But what EyeTV does, it does well:
      * TV Guide Integration is pretty good, with a number of providers, depending on your locale
      * Scheduling (and auto-scheduling of series)
      * Editing of TV episodes - it's good enough for cropping out commercials if you want to keep the show.
      * Good hardware support
      * Easy to use
      * Auto (or manual) Exports to a variety of formats. (Whatever QuickTime supports - which is pretty much anything if you have the right plugin)
      * Easy (and automated, if desired) exporting to iTunes (for iPod or Apple TV's)
      * Can stream to an iPod Touch or iPhone
      * iPhone/iPod Touch interface application.
      * Integrates with ElGato's "Turbo.264" hardware, which is a USB H.264 encoding accelerator. Not the best compression quality, but it's generally faster than a dual-core Intel box.
      * If you have EyeTV on other macs in your network, it can use Bonjour to stream the TV shows to the other machines.

      So while it has a number of features that are quite Apple-centric (ie. good iPod/Apple TV integration), iPod Touch/iPhone application, etc... it still lets you export to pretty much whatever format you want easily. Or, if you don't want to do it that way, you can look inside the "eyetv" recording, and you'll find the raw MPEG stream, and you can use whatever software you want to export it.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  6. Windows Media Center by Sporkinum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Windows Media Center, specifically Vista media center, has worked out well for me. I got a cheap ($250), refurbed gateway that came with a dual tuner card and Vista home premium. The listings are occasionally flakey, and the scheduled recordings won't automatically adjust if shows are pre-empted by football games running long. I control everything through the xbox360 using a $10 remote I bought on ebay. Very user friendly and cheaper than heck.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Windows Media Center by HerculesMO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seconded. It's simple, the remote isn't too bad, it has a clean UI and a bunch of addons out there (greenbutton.com or something).

      Best of luck!

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    2. Re:Windows Media Center by stikves · · Score: 4, Informative

      Definitely agree on Windows Media Center.

      With my multiple HDTV tuners, excellent remote, Netflix, and Hulu plugins, and also Internet TV, it's basically irreplaceable. I'm not even mentioning you can stream to multiple Xbox'es on your house over the network... Oops, I mentioned that :)

    3. Re:Windows Media Center by seamonkey420 · · Score: 2, Informative
      agreed on MCE.

      i've used many of the other DVR/PVR applications (MythTV, SageTV, Nero, etc) but none have worked as smoothly as Media Center, Windows 7 MCE really brings its A game. :)

      i have a remote and IR blaster and mainly use mine to record just network tv; i can also easily access any of the recorded tv shows over my homegroup on any of my other Windows 7 laptops/netbooks and even my PS3.

      MP4 movies look and work well inside of MCE too (atleast on Win7, vista had a few issues w/MP4/h264 codecs since it didn't support it natively). I run MCE on my HP laptop and use a MCE remote i got with my tuner card. Netflix plugin is really well done too.

    4. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      We did the same thing (refurbished Gateway w/ Vista Home Premium), a number of years ago (not long after Vista was released). We couldn't use the machine for a desktop because Vista was so non-functional (our first, last and only encounter with it), but we had a tuner card unused from a long-dead machine and put it in the Vista box and have been using it as our "TV" ever since. Amazingly, it actually functions as a TV. Netflix streaming works from within Windows Media Center without problem, every DVD we have tried has played without problem, and when we replaced the tuner with a 2xtuner card, we can watch one channel, record another, etc, the usual things you expect from a DVR. So "it just works" applies to us. The box came with Gateway's version of the WMC remote control and it works adequately (we also had a second one lying around from a dead machine, so we have two in the room that work for the "TV"). That said, WMC is far from perfect. The "Guide" doesn't support over-air TV sub-channels (i.e. 2.2) so getting TV listing for the subchannels requires looking at zap2it or the newspaper (not a big deal for us). The user interface for DVDs is annoying in one major way: fast-forward and fast-rewind. It does it, but when you push "play" again after fast-forwarding, it starts replay from a disconcertingly-distant point. The place in the movie displayed when you pushed "play" on the remote is not where it starts playing. And I'm not talking about a second or two... more like 10 or more. Very annoying. The Netflix interface is somewhat better, fast-forward goes at a dizzing rate, and when you push pause, you get a nice string of thumbnails, one every ten seconds, that you can scroll through to pick a new resume point. Buffering works like it should, and amazingly, we haven't encountered even one instance of playback stopping due to buffer under-run (we have 10Mbps downlink fiber connection, so it *shouldn't* have to, but still surprised microsoft managed to do it especially under Vista). With both DVDs and Netflix (and recorded-TV) playback, the fast-forward and fast-rewind speeds are limited and generally not exactly what you want (as opposed to a better DVD playback that offers tiered/stepped FF/REW speeds... push it one more time, it goes faster... unfortunately WMC does not seem to have this function). The DVR functionality is fine as far as we are concerned. It does integrate with the guide and you can have it record all instances of a program series (unless it is on a broadcast sub-channel). The interface for recorded TV is incredibly awful, though. If you want to delete recorded programs, **you have to do them one at a time**. Really. And it's not one-click or one-remote-button delete, it is "click to display the item, navigate to the "delete" menu option, click/remote-button, then confirm you want to do it, then go back to main recorded-TV menu, and find the next *ONE* item you want to delete. If you have very many, you might as well just find the media folder on your hard drive and do it via windows explorer.

      But since you mentioned family and "it just works", and as much as I hate to say microsoft is useful for anything, WMC under vista satisfies the "it just works" requirement (lamely in some respects, but works nonetheless). Most of the time, it goes weeks without ever having to mess with the keyboard, we can just use it as the "TV" (DVD/netflix) via the remote controls as if it were a "TV".

    5. Re:Windows Media Center by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've got Windows 7 Media center running with a Linksys Media Center Extender.

      On the positive side, It Just Works. Having a paperback sized MCE (cheap on Ebay, BTW) next to the big-screen rather than a PC is very nice.

      On the negative side, Microsoft keeps trying so hard to prevent users from doing what they'd like.
      For example, they changed to the .wtv file format late in the Vista cycle, which broke things like dvrmstoolbox that was used for commercial skipping, and had no desire to help fix it. That's fixed by the community now, of course.

      They also broke ripped DVD playback on the extender. For the Vista media center, it was found that by creating a hard link to the DVD files (and giving the hard link a ".mp4" (IIRC) extension), DVD's would play fine on the extender. With Windows 7, sorry, but that workaround has been disabled.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    6. Re:Windows Media Center by Simulant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, MCE is pretty good as a out-of-the-box DVR. However, it can suck if you regularly download video to watch. It can neither play much of it (out-of-the-box) nor does it organize it very well. Be pepared to tweak.

      I also find it to be a bit piggish on resources. The interface is slower than I'm used to. It is often useless if accessing shared files over a wireless connection as it spends too much time & bandwidth indexing generating thumbnail previews to playback video properly. (on a 150Mbps (maybe 30-50 actual) N connection) Again, be prepared to tweak.

      I find it to be absolutely horrible if you have a very large (thousands of files) and dynamic collection of multimedia files. (I'm looking at about 250GB of music and a TB of video) My stuff is organized well enough in the file system and I'd prefer my media center not index it but just use the existing directory structure.

      MCE is pretty and works OK if you have a small/stable multimedia collection and also use it in the fairly limited way that Microsoft wants/expects you to but I prefer Media Portal. (http://www.team-mediaportal.com/) It also requires tweaking but is far, FAR more flexible, and the end result works better for me.

      Finally, MCE on 7 is an improvement over MCE on Vista, but hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    7. Re:Windows Media Center by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Informative

      One more vote for MCE.

      -CableCARD support
      -Netflix client built in (though no HD for now)
      -Great remote
      -Very simple but functional UI
      -Free if you have a half-decent edition of either of the last two Windows releases
      -Xbox (with software), Xbox 360, and numerous other devices supported as extenders for a single central home DVR

      I won't give up my HD cable channels, so Windows MCE, TiVo, and Moxi are the three options, end of story. Only one of those allows me to build my own machine and centralize all the tuners. If Myth or one of the others gains CableCARD support in the future, they might be worth considering. Until then...

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  7. I'm curious myself. by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the freedom of MythTV, I've been running it for about 4 years now, but it can often be tricky to get working if there is a problem. Particularly if there is a MySQL problem when I don't have a great deal of expertize in database administration. I'd like to take advantage of the new cable-card hardware coming out for high definition too.

    Right now it pretty much seems either windows media center or giving in and getting a TiVO, but I'm curious about some of the other things out there like Sage TV. Sadly, not everything is available online right now without having to go to bit-torrent, especially high-def content.

  8. Windows Media Center by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I set up Windows Media Center on Vista and I like the way it works. It's pretty simple to use and set up. I bought a 2 tuner card for it so I can record 2 shows simultaneously. Even more useful is the integration with Amazon UnBox and Video On Demand. It just works. Makes trips to the video store extraneous. I haven't tried Netflix as I want simple on demand outside of my cable box. This machine is set up in the living room, and is hooked up to a 37 inch panel. I bought the overpriced remote for Media Center and that works well too (although the kids keep losing it) Overall, I'm happy with the quality, and plan on upgrading to Windows 7 at some point, but really don't have a need as it simply works well now.

    Now, cue the MS Haters and mod me down. I know, I know... I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  9. TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Original Questioner asks " So my questions to you: What DVR software do you use? Are you happy with it? What don't you like? Are there any packages out there that 'just work' as media hubs and for time-shifting cable TV?"

    I realize that the TITLE says "PC based DVR software" and the questioner certainly mentions only that, but they don't mention commercial solutions at all, so I'll throw in my answer:

    TiVo

    I have a Series3 that I bought with a lifetime contract ~2 years ago. I do not pay a monthly fee, and as of now, I am "saving" that cost (the lifetime contract covers ~ 2 - 2.5 years of monthly service fees).

    - It has two built in tuners.
    - It integrates with most IR remotes.
    - It can be controlled via IP (there are free remotes for iPhone/IPod and other devices to control it, etc.)
    - TiVo maintains a web site where you can log in and tell your DVR to record something.
    - Any Internet enabled TiVo (Series3, TiVoHD, TiVoHD-XL) can also hook into AmazonVideo, Netflix and Blockbuster accounts.

    - It also passes "the wife" test.

    Outside of initial setup (when we were on cable TV and I had to get TWC to come out and put CableCards in the thing), the ONLY maintenance I've had to do is reset its listings when we decided to drop cable completely and switch to using an Over-The-Air antenna, and changing the batteries in the remote.

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:TiVo for the win? by jimbogun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm in the Tivo boat on this one. It's just easier. I spent so much time setting up MythTv (I've done it on PCs, laptops, and even an xbox) and maintaining it was always a pain. I finally got fed up enough and bought a Tivo. Since then, I haven't had any complaints, except as he said, resetting listings when you switch providers. I've really enjoyed the Tivo suggestions feature as well. I was tempted to get the lifetime contract, but instead I'm willing to pay ~$100/year for someone to maintain my DVR for me.

    2. Re:TiVo for the win? by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm on the TiVo boat as well. If you want to serve up media from a PC, throw pyTiVo on it, and point it at whatever directory contains your video files. The format of the video files doesn't even matter -- on the back-end it uses ffmpeg to do the video conversion.

      I have a refurbished Compaq with a 2.4Ghz Core2Duo I bought last year, and it can convert at about 200fps, easily saturating the TiVo's network capabilities. Once setup, the system just appears in the Now Playing List. It has easily passed the wife test in my home over and over again (especially as she has access to the movies directory over the network from the desktop of her Mac -- if she gets something she'd like to put up, she knows to just drag and drop it into the folder, and then start playing it from the NPL on the TiVo).

      Yaz.

    3. Re:TiVo for the win? by dmorel · · Score: 2

      Agreed. For what the OP is asking for, any of the HD flavored tivo's is ideal. Coupled with pytivo you can throw pretty much anything you ever have at it, and when it comes to the best DVR, tivo wins hands down. There simply is NO (reasonable) argument (that I can think of) to be made disputing that fact. The tivo UI/UX (despite whatever issues one may have with it) is just better than every other option out there. I've fooled around with everything under the sun starting with the first xbox based xbmc builds up to a win7 MCE HTPC. Fun to mess around with, not fun to rely on long term and add in the WAF and it's over. I use my tivo's for everything and stopped futzing around with all these other "projects" Unless of course you get your television from a satellite based provider then... I got nothin'

    4. Re:TiVo for the win? by markdavis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last time I tried pyTiVo with my TiVO HD, the results were far from stellar. I do store many of my DVD's as 1Mb/s 264 + AC3 AVI files and it just didn't seem to like it. It down-res'ed them horribly and the resulting video was poor. Plus, I believe it trashes the AC3, resulting in just stereo (yuck) sound.

      Now, it has been at least a year since I messed with it (and gave up on it). If you think it has improved, I will give it another shot.

      Not having decent local streaming of video files has been my #2 complaint with TiVo (#1 being that we can't easily backup the damn settings to a USB key or something so if the unit dies we can recover many hours of work done with preferences, season passes, stations, etc). Otherwise, the TiVo HD is *extremely* impressive and I highly recommend it... it runs circles around any cable provider's DVR or "software" solution I have seen.

  10. It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The nice thing about a completely open and flexible system is that you can route around it's quirks with other tools. The fact that you can just drop in xine or mplayer is one of the key strengths of MythTV and would likely be necessary in any replacement. I've never gotten this fixation and insistence on using only MythTV for anything myth related. It doesn't have to be that way and that's kind of the point.

    Play with MCE and Front Row and see for yourself. The grass may not necessarily be greener.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The terible thing about existing completely open and flexible system is that you have to route around their quirks with other tools.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      [FC]I am Jacks complete lack of tolerance.[/FC]

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  11. For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm still using MythTV for recording TV, but I'm currently selling off my MythFrontends.

    For viewing I've switched to an LG BD390. Much less hassle, plays everything I've thrown at (including HD streams recorded by the MythBackend) via UPnP and also does NetFlix and YouTube streaming.

  12. GBPVR by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Informative

    GBPVR works like an appliance should; easily, the first time, and always. You can write your own plug-ins and skins, or download them.

  13. HD cable box with pvr by kawabago · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to use mythtv but now have upgraded to HD cable box with dual tuner pvr. It is the best option for ease of use. Skipping commercials isn't automatic but otherwise I think it is the best price/simplicity option.

  14. For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Yosho · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MythTV backend for recording TV is great, but the frontend is very rough around the edges, even after years of development. As a general media center, XBMC is fantastic; its support for playing DVDs, video files, and music is the best I've found on Linux. There's also a plugin for XBMC that gives it functionality as a MythTV frontend, and while it doesn't have quite the same range of capabilities as the official MythTV frontend, it nonetheless works well.

    Unfortunately, there's no way you're going to be streaming Netflix movies in Linux, due to Netflix's DRM. The only way to do it is with a Windows box or using an embedded solution. I use an Xbox 360 for that.

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    1. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Turtle+Master · · Score: 2, Informative

      I run a stripped-down WindowsXP instance in a virtualbox VM on my mythtv box, just for streaming netflix. It works great. I just run it full screen on a separate workspace, and switch back and forth with ctrl-alt-left/right.

    2. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have to echo this, especially since my TV habits have moved away from watching most of the crap I taped off TV and instead watching stuff I've ripped from my DVD's.

      Been using Myth since 2002/2003 so I'm no novice (still using the same DB I had in late 2004 - certainly been fun keeping that in sync with upgrades!) and it's a really nice recording platform once you've spent a year or two of hair loss exploring it's foibles. But the frontend is poor; very little in the way of swish or eye candy... yet still painfully slow. Both those aspects have improved massively with 0.22, but the XBMC frontend is bling on toast. And the default skin, PM3, is much nicer than anything I've run into for Myth (flashy bit minimalist at the same time, YMMV), you don't even need a decent graphics card - my bedroom unit runs off an Intel G31 and drives a 1920x1200 screen, and even 1080p H.264 isn't a problem.

      But BY FAR the biggest clincher for me was the automated movie/TV lookups in XBMC. I have about 900 movies and 3000 or so TV episodes, and if you want metadata lookups in MythTV be prepared to spend an eternity bringing up a sub-menu and searching for metadata (after adding the series and episode numbers manually which it somehow can't figure out automatically). In XBMC you add a movie or TV show, and every time it starts (or is triggered manually) it'll walk down your tree and pick up metadata, including pretty pictures, automatically from themoviedb or thetvdb (or any of the other grabbers you'd like to use). This alone saved me DAYS importing collections; the only caveats are that a) I had to write a custom regexp for XBMC to recognise my filename convention and b) it sometimes picks the wrong film/show, but that's easy enough to fix manually.

      XBMC's biggest failing in my book is remote support. There's built in stuff, but if you have a non-standard remote you need to write your own config files (yes, multiple files) - and to me this was one of the most counter-intuitive and badly documented procedures I've ever done in my history with computers. Thankfully most of the rest of the doco for XBMC is much clearer, and IMHO much more informative than similar stuff for Myth.

      XBMC getting ported to Linux was the best thing that happened to my media centre. Faster than mythfrontend and, to me and my techie and non-techie flatmates, much more intuitive in use - even setting up 5.1 over SPDIF was a snap compared to Myth.

      I'd recommend anyone looking into a good PVR mashup on Linux to investigate mythbackend + XBMC as a possible combo.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  15. Windows 7 and Media Browser by Laoping · · Score: 4, Informative

    In years past I've used XBMC on the Xbox and Linux, then more recently Boxee and MediaPortal. I started wanting something that just worked, and was a bit easier to setup. I really like many of the Linux media programs, but they do take a bit of maintenance. So when the RC of Windows 7 came out I figured I'd give it a go. Once I found Media Browser (www.mediabrowser.tv), I was sold.

    So reasons I think Windows 7 is the way to go.

    1. Media Browser - Fantastic plug-in for media center. Almost as good as XMBC in it's prettiness and useability. Very impressive to show off to your friends and high Wife Acceptance Factor.
    2. Easy - It took me about a week of fiddling after work to get it setup the way I wanted.. and I had no issues getting DTS HD or pass-through audio to work. Very easy to get hardware accelerated video to work with ATI. If you use windows 7, check out the antipack, gets your hardware accelerated video working fast, along with all your audio. (http://babgvant.com/blogs/andyvt/archive/2009/08/02/antipack-get-your-videos-working-without-destroying-your-pc.aspx)
    3. Cheap Video card - I bought a Radeon 4350 off of Newegg, with passive cooling. Does 1080p video with 1 - 5% cpu usage.
    4. NetFlix , Media Center has a NetFlix plugin, no HD video, yet.
    5. Easy TV - Has a nice TV Guide, easy to make it work right. I do not have a cable card tuner for it yet, but Ati has on you can get off of ebay, and new models are coming out next year. Cable card tuner would eliminate your ir blaster issue. In the mean time there are a few MS Media Center remotes that come with ir blasters. Also TV shows go right into Media Browser.

    As this is slashdot I bet I will get spammed for saying so, but IMHO it is the best all around system out there right now.

  16. XBMC by jackjumper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lifehacker likes XBMC (http://lifehacker.com/5105649/hive-five-winner-for-best-media-center-application-xbmc). I use an Apple TV running XBMC and Boxee, which works pretty well, but is kind of slow. I'm planning on picking up one of these (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103234&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-Desktop+PC-_-Acer+America-_-83103234) to replace the apple tv. Not sure what I'm going to run on it yet. I hear the Windows 7 media center is pretty nice, actually

  17. Recording HD? by rlp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While we're on the topic - is there a good solution for recording HD from cable? I'm currently using analog cable with a Hauppauge card to record programs in standard definition. Potential solutions:

    1) DVR from cable company. Problems: I've gotten anecdotal information that these DVR's have poorly designed UI's and tend to be somewhat flaky (worse than Windows). Also, they are a closed system, I can't move the recording to a mobile device for portable viewing.
    2) PC + HD ATSC / Clear-QAM tuner card - this gives me the ability to record over the air broadcasts and cable channels that support Clear-QAM (which is a fairly small subset of cable channels).
    3) PC + HD Tuner Card + Cable Card - does anyone make one of these? Anyone have any experience with this?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Recording HD? by northernboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't tell if anyone in a low-modded comment suggested this, but how about the Hauppauge HD-PVR? http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hdpvr.html Have yet to buy one, mainly because I don't think the machine I'm using is fast enough to keep up, but it looks like it should work until component video connectors go away.

  18. There are 3 prime-time PVR's on Windows by TomXP411 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sage TV, Beyond TV, and Media Center are all mature products that work well on Windows.

    Media Center is very "Microsoft-y", and it's not as configurable as the others. The upside is that it's seamlessly integrated with Windows, and it passes the WAF test rather well.

    Sage TV is a tinkerer's dream, but I never managed to get it successfully up and running with QAM channels mapped.

    Beyond TV was my favorite for a long time, as it's both configurable and stable. The only problem is that Snapstream has slowed active development of the consumer product. Their prime focus is on developing for the Enterprise market. (Think one server, recording a dozen news channels at once, extracting closed-caption information to create a searchable database.) BTV has one great bonus feature: It can automatically re-compress video down to H.264 and drop the show in to iTunes as a Podcast. This is pretty slick, since it lets you save several TV shows to your iPod or iPhone and take them with with you.

    BTV and Sage can both record HD through the Hauppauge HD-PVR, and all 3 can record ClearQAM content (usually your local TV stations.)

    Windows 7 Media Center will also record encrypted QAM cable with a CableCard, but the CableCard capture devices aren't quite ready for public consumption yet; I believe the ATI box's firmware is still in closed beta, and the Ceton device will hit the market early next year. (The Ceton card will record 4 SD or HD shows at the same time.)

    BTV and Sage can control your cable box with a USB-UIRT or MCE Remote (with an IR blaster). Media Center will only control your box with an MCE remote/blaster. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000W5GK5C/ref=ox_ya_oh_product">Amazon has one for about $40 that works well.</a>

    BTV and Sage both can also stream live video to other PC's on the network. Media Center can only play back pre-recorded video; if you want to watch live TV an another PC, that PC needs a tuner card.

  19. Tivo Warning by clinko · · Score: 4, Informative

    A HUGE warning about the Tivo:

    Tivo lists show transferring is a big feature but...

    EVERYTHING worth watching on cable is DRM'd. EVERYTHING.

    It bugs me that they advertise this as a feature.

    Blame Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, whoever you want, but the TIVO does not transfer anything but your fox, nbc, and cbs channels.

    Analogy:
    - Ford makes a car that can't drive over speed bumps
    - Ford advertises the car jumping speed bumps
    - After buying the car, Ford tells you to drive on limited roads or YOU can call your local town hall to fix every speed bump in town. Ford has no responsibility, and will not assist in any way.

    Only 2 months left on my contract, and I'm done with this scam.

    1. Re:Tivo Warning by nonliteral · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends entirely on your cable company. I have two TivoHDs with cablecards on FIOS, and (thus far, knocking on wood), I've yet to see them mark anything as non-copyable.

  20. Re:Consoles by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because neither one records live tv?
    Or lets you run your own apps?

  21. MythTV automatic commercial skipping by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    commercial skipping that does not even require a remote button press. That is the killer feature for me with MythTV and why I keep using it. I also have diskless frontends and when I want a new one I can just plug it in and it just works. And then there is the web interface that I can use to program recording shows from anywhere. I agree with other posters with just using xine or another player for playing DVD's and it not being a bad thing. You can send args to xine to surpress the splash screen and everything else and then seamlessly fall back to MythTV when you hit "end" on the remote so I don't see the problem. As for streaming, I got a blue ray player that has netflix streaming (a roku box would work and be cheaper). All of this is controlled with one universal remote. If you want flexiblity you get it with myth. If you constantly tinker and upgrade, you will always be tinkering with myth, but you can also choose to set it up and just use it. From everything I have seen, MythTV's flexibility beats everything else I have tried (to the point where people are using other solutions like xmbc as a part of their MythTV solution).

    1. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It uses a few methods - blank screen detection is one of them ( I think the default), since there are usually a few black frames at the start of a commercial break. Scene change detection is another. You can tweak which methods it uses. In my experience, it gets it right about 85% of time. When it doesn't, the 30-second skip works wonders :-)

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  22. My Suggestion is SageTV by alan92rttt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have two PC based DVR's in the house. I've used several peices of software over the years and Sage TV has been the best. The UI is IMO much easier to use that Win MCE. It has the basic functions(record, play, ff/rw TV) as well as DVD playback, audio, pictures and other Video files. Its audio and video playback is limited to the codecs you have loaded. Native it will search and stream youtube videos. Their are several user created addons to enhance the look and feel as well as functions. Their is a new addon that connects to the playon software that will give you netflix and hulu streams from within sage. The software can be setup in client/server mode so that all of your cable box's and other hardware can be in another room and you just have either a PC or their media extender in the living room. It works well with Hauppague's HD-PVR for HD recording from a cable box via the analog HD component out. www.sagetv.com be sure to check their forums.

  23. Nero LiquidTV by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had TiVos for years and years and years. I have a Series 3 now. I love it.

    But if you want a truly PC based solution, how about Nero LiquidTV? It is basically the official PC version of the TiVo software. It still needs a TiVo subscription, but it has all the features and the same fantastic interface.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  24. Cable box + firewire output by foom · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use:
    4) Cablebox with Firewire output + firewire port on PC.

    It works really quite well.

    Cable companies are required to offer cable boxes with firewire (usually the HD ones all come with it). However, depending on your cableco, the firewire output may or may not be encrypted. You can only connect it to your PC if it is not encrypted.

    Note that the presence or absence of encryption on the Firewire output is *totally independent* from whether the data is encrypted on the cable line. The cable box decrypts the signal with its cable card, and possibly re-encrypts it for the firewire output, depending on the cableco's settings.

    For me (with RCN Boston), I've found that all the extended-basic channels are sent unencrypted over the firewire output, except, paradoxially, *sometimes* the HD OTA channels. I dunno what's up with that, but my solution was to just not go through the cable box for those channels. I don't subscribe to premiums, so I don't know whether they are encrypted or not. Your mileage may of course vary, depending on provider and possibly even region.

  25. WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done by thechemic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done. Time shift TV, HD quality Netflix, Media storage and streaming to any xbox, PS3, laptop, desktop, or windows mobile phone. It just works. No tinkering.

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
  26. Re:Consoles by frozen_kangaroo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I use an old, practically scrap, Pentium 4 hidden away in the loft running Mythbackend with tuners and big hard drives in it. It sits there and records programs. It uses a Fedora 9 distro, and dependency hell was dealt with smoothly by running yum.

    Under the main television that we watch is a PS3, which sees the backend as a UPnP media server without any fuss. All recorded programs show up under the "video" menu. Any machine in the house can also be used as a frontend, if Mythfrontend is installed. Mythweb can be used to configure it remotely (even off-site if I'm feeling brave enough to let incoming conections to it from the outside world) so you can log in and set something to record if you are out and about.

    I'm really happy with the system and not got any particular moans, other than the fact that tuners don't just work out of the box and forums have to be read ...

  27. Moonlight does not work with Netflix by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 2, Informative
    Moonlight is not the answer to the Netflix streaming video problem. I've got Moonlight 1.0.1 installed (been looking for a way to stream video to my linux box from Netflix) and here is what you get from Netflix when you try to stream a movie:

    Watching instantly on your computer Our apologies — streaming is not supported for your operating system. Note that your current Internet browser is fully compatible with adding titles to the Instant Queue for later watching on compatible devices. Complete System Requirements To watch instantly, you'll need a computer that meets the following minimum requirements: * Windows o Windows XP with Service Pack 2, or Vista o Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher; or Firefox 2 or higher o 1.2 GHz processor o 512 MB RAM * Mac o An Intel-based Mac with OS 10.4.8 or later o Safari 3 or higher; or Firefox 2 or higher o 1 GB RAM

  28. Hauppauge HD-PVR and Snapstream BeyondTV by ayden · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using Snapstream BeyondTV for 4 years. I started first with a Hauppauge SD tuner card. I now have a Happaugue HD-PVR, a Motorola HD FiOS box and change channels with a USB-UIRT. The Motorola HD box connects the HD-PVR with component video and optical SPDIF cables. The HD-PVR connects to my Win7-x64 system via USB.

    BeyondTV downloads the TV guide, manages the recording schedule and controls the HD-PVR and Motorola HD box with the USB-UIRT. The recording format is an H.264 transport stream (the file type is .tp) which uses about 3.6 GB per hour on the HD-High quality setting. These files are readily burned to a Blu-ray disk without re-encoding. The system is completely seamless.

    My next step is to configure a DLNA enabled LG Blu-ray player in my living room to which I can stream the recorded files.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
  29. try pytivo again by danpritts · · Score: 2, Informative

    ++ as far as tivo's actual DVR functionality.

    if pytivo thinks you have an HD Tivo, it won't change the resolution at all (it does transcode to mpeg2). The series3 will scale the video itself (and it has a pretty good scaler chip in my experience).

    If it thinks you have a series2, it will change the res, presumably to 640x480 but i haven't checked. Perhaps you misconfigured it so it thought you had a series2.

    pytivo tries to detect if your file uses a supported codec (includes ac3), and just copy the audio stream if so; otherwise it transcodes, but the default transcoding target is in fact AC3.

    I *have* had problems with 5.1 sound not being properly mixed down to stereo (yeah, yuck, but it's what i had until recently). The center channel was always sent to one speaker or the other. not sure if it's pytivo (ffmpeg really, it does the transcoding) or the tivo that causes this. I haven't really tried to debug it.

    it is under active development and the devs seem to pay attention to support requests on the forums, so i'd suggest you give it another shot.

    you need to make sure you have a good ffmpeg build. this can be non-trivial; the one that comes with your linux distro may not be good/new enough. the pytivo forums have links to win32 binaries that work for most people. If you're on a mac or bsd, try the ffmpeg-devel port rather than the ffmpeg port.

    pytivo recently gained the ability to stream from DVD images. I haven't tested this but i suspect it works fine.

    I like pytivo a lot, the only issue i have with it is speed. I have this cpu (1.9GHz dual-core athlon) and it's not fast enough to transcode hi-def in realtime.

    you xfer the program and it dribbles through and you can watch it later.

    More importantly, i've tried pre-transcoding and just transferring the mpeg-2 stream (pytivo will not transcode this at all), and the tivo (presumably) can't keep up, it still is a bit slower than realtime. That's annoying; i can pre-transcode or buy a faster cpu, but if the streaming just isn't fast enough then i'm kinda stuck. I am using 100Mbit wired ethernet, it's not some crappy wireless that's the issue. I haven't really investigated this.

  30. Re:Beyond TV by tedgyz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would give a strong thumbs up for BeyondTV (by snapstream). I have used it for several years and have not complaints. If you are looking for a DVR solution, look no further. In your requirements though, you elaborate on wanted a media hub, which IMHO is not a DVR. If you are looking to record and view TV, BeyondTV is awesome and much better than tivo. For one thing, they have smartskip which attempts to mark commercial breaks. It isn't perfect, but when it works it is a godsend.

    More importantly, beyondtv passes the family test. My tech-n00b wife uses it, as well as my kids, including my 6 year old. With BeyondTV link you can also watch from other computers. That's where it really shines. One kid can be watching a show on the main TV while another has a laptop in the bedroom watching a different show.

    You have to pay for the software, but there is no subscription. TV channel updates are reliable and accurate.

    No - I don't work for snapstream - I'm just an extremely happy customer.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  31. Interesting... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's non-free ($40US) Windows-only software but it serves NetFlix over your LAN via DLNA/uPnP...

    http://www.playon.tv/playon/how-it-works

    A tidy, secure-ish and affordable (if you use XP) solution might be to install it on a Windows VM running on your Linux server...one box still does all the serving and if the Windows VM gets pwned, you just bring it back from a backup in minutes. The VM will have a separate IP via its virtual network adapter so it shouldn't conflict with the host box. DRM might be an issue too but this could be a workable solution if you really want NetFlix in a non-Windows environment...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel