Slashdot Mirror


Swiss Geologist On Trial For Causing Earthquakes

Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that Markus Haering's company had been working with the authorities in Basel, Switzerland to try to convert the heat in deep-seated rocks into electricity, but the project was suspended in 2006 when drilling triggered earthquakes, one of them with a magnitude of 3.4, leading Haering's company to pay out $9M in damages. Haering's team planned to drill a series of holes penetrating up to 3 miles (4.8 km) underground with water being pumped onto rocks with a temperature of more than 195C. Basel's location on top of a fault line – the upper Rhine trench – had been deliberately chosen because the heat was closer to the Earth's surface. A risk assessment has since shown that the prospect of further quakes is too high to continue drilling in the city. Haering faces up to five years in prison if the judge finds he intentionally damaged property. Haering has admitted the 3.4 magnitude earthquake was stronger than he had expected and that his team 'had very little knowledge of seismicity' before starting to drill, but called the quakes 'a learning process for everyone involved.' Despite Haering's trial, the Swiss appetite for geothermal projects has not diminished. Engineers are beginning preliminary drilling in Zurich to see whether that area was suitable for a similar scheme, and St. Gallen, in eastern Switzerland, plans to start work on its own geothermal project next year. Drilling efforts are being closely watched in the US, where the energy department is sponsoring more than 120 geothermal energy projects in several states."

25 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Blahgh by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, gotta break a few eggs (and dishes) to make an omelet.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Blahgh by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Basel is EGS's "Altamont Pass". Altamont Pass was a wind farm that gave wind turbines their (undeserved) reputation as being bird killers. They built a wind farm right in the middle of a bird flyway, using low, fast-spinning turbines. It was a learning experience; nobody would be stupid enough to do that again.

      It's the same thing with EGS and earthquakes. In Basel, they deliberately fractured an active fault that had previously destroyed the city. Nobody is going to be dumb enough to do that again.

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
    2. Re:Blahgh by nschubach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I makes me wonder... I'm no geologist by any measure, but there's obviously pressure built up in that area. Wouldn't drilling holes to break holds and release some of that plate pressure by causing smaller quakes be a preferred course of action? Would it either be that or waiting for one giant major natural shift that could cause even more damage?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Blahgh by pileated · · Score: 4, Funny

      When it comes to being dumb, never say never!

    4. Re:Blahgh by svtdragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nobody is going to be dumb enough to do that again.

      I bet somebody once said that about people rebuilding cities on top of active faults.

    5. Re:Blahgh by Applekid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would it either be that or waiting for one giant major natural shift that could cause even more damage?

      No good deed goes unpunished?

      If you leave it alone and a natural disaster happens, you can't really sue God. If you drill and make mini-quakes and someone's windows break, you can definitely sue the driller.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    6. Re:Blahgh by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I respectfully disagree. After living in the pacific northwest and experiencing numerous earthquakes firsthand, I can say with some authority that any structure built in a tectonically active region that cannot safely handle a 3.4 magnitude earthquake was built improperly.

      There were several 3.5ish earthquakes in Oregon where I lived over the last 20 years and as far as I know, broken picture frames were the extent of the damage. Geothermal energy production only makes sense in places where volcanic or tectonic activity is likely. It's not without risk either.

      It seems obvious that there was no intentional earthquake caused, but that was the natural result of fracturing the fault and 3.4 hardly sounds noteworthy. However, more detailed seismic study seems warranted before moving forward with any such project in the future.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    7. Re:Blahgh by maugle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In fact, the city should be grateful. Much better to have a magnitude 3.4 quake now, than to let the stress in the fault line accumulate until it breaks out in the form of a magnitude 8.0 quake.

    8. Re:Blahgh by similar_name · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you leave it alone and a natural disaster happens, you can't really sue God. If you drill and make mini-quakes and someone's windows break, you can definitely sue the driller.

      Makes me wonder. This is not the first time it's been believed that drilling triggered an earthquake. How long until you can sue because the city didn't pay for drillers to relieve pressure and major earthquake occurs.

  2. Here we go... by Philotic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt the geologist is at fault. However, his defense rests on really shaky ground.

    1. Re:Here we go... by Jophish · · Score: 3, Funny

      He isn't really at fault here.

  3. No, me! ME! by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blast it, I failed the broadcast take over announcing my intentions for world domination! It was my demostration of my earthquake machine! me, me ME!

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  4. Damages? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These villagers were scamming the poor guy. $9 million in damages from a *3.4* quake? Cripes, a bus crossing in front of my house is close to 3.4... either their houses are made from eggshells, or this is the scam of the century.

    I'd feel terrible if useful research was suspended because of profiteering townsfolk.

    1. Re:Damages? by Peregr1n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some parts of the world are more used to earthquakes than others, and plan accordingly. I'm guessing (from a quick glance at your blog) that you're in the USA - western? Your houses are probably designed to be quake-proof, and a 3.4 quake will do nothing but rattle your plates. Here in Europe most housing is traditional stone, and earthquakes are something that happens in far-flung corners of the Earth.
      Disclaimer - I don't know how severe a 3.4 quake is, maybe it really is inconsequential - but my point still stands in that it probably caused the residents of Basel to shit themselves. (Far from villagers, too, BTW)

  5. US project shut down by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thankfully a project by the same company just north of San Francisco has been shut down. The last thing CA needs is more earthquakes.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/science/earth/12quake.html

  6. Re:A Learning Experience - by Quantos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just imagine the other inmates, 'So, what are you in for?'

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
  7. Eggshell defense by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    These villagers were scamming the poor guy. $9 million in damages from a *3.4* quake? Cripes, a bus crossing in front of my house is close to 3.4... either their houses are made from eggshells, or this is the scam of the century.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggshell_skull

    Translation/application: if you demonstrate negligence and cause an earthquake, even if everyone's houses are made of chewing gum and paper- you're responsible for the damage, because had you not done what you did, the damage wouldn't have happened.

    1. Re:Eggshell defense by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually I think the engineers who designed and built the buildings should be held negligent, building a structure that takes *any* damage from a 3.4 in a fault zone should be criminal. Seriously we get earthquakes on that magnitude here in Ohio on an almost yearly basis, in the middle of the freaking NA plate. If you are in a geothermally active country you should be expecting a heck of a lot more than that!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  8. Re:A Learning Experience - by six11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I imagine he would be seen as an evil supervillain like Lex Luthor or something, and emerge from jail with a small army to do his geological bidding.

  9. Hey, it's a good way to get rid of... by mrami · · Score: 5, Funny

    those pesky minarets! Yeppers!

  10. can we go after natural gas companies, too? by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/business/energy-environment/08fracking.html

    The drilling boom is raising concern in many parts of the country, and the reaction is creating political obstacles for the gas industry. Hazards like methane contamination of drinking water wells, long known in regions where gas production was common, are spreading to populous areas that have little history of coping with such risks, but happen to sit atop shale beds.

    And a more worrisome possibility has come to light. A string of incidents in places like Wyoming and Pennsylvania in recent years has pointed to a possible link between hydraulic fracturing and pollution of groundwater supplies. In the worst case, such pollution could damage crucial supplies of water used for drinking and agriculture

    It isn't going to be climate change that kills us. We won't have any clean water to drink. Fun fact: the "safe water drinking act" isn't being enforced by the EPA, and even water that has very unhealthy level of arsenic is "safe". Does a 1-in-600 chance of getting bladder cancer sound "safe" to you?

  11. Re:Intentionally? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not familiar with Swiss law either. This may be a lost-in-translation issue. If he knew his actions would cause damage, and continued in those actions anyway, then likely he has committed some crime. The specific word "intent" may not be the right one here... "willful" may be a better translation/interpretation.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. Drying clothes and linen on rope in sun and wind by Max_W · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this to produce electricity to dry clothing in the electric dryers. Just let people dry clothing and linen on the ropes in the sun and wind.

    Billions and billions of such drying wet items will cool the planet. Because it will be daily, and it will be in billions.

    We are trying to solve by engineering means a problem which is not a technical problem. It is a problem in our heads.

  13. impossible by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't "cause" an earthquake. They are caused by tectonic pressure. You may be able to adjust the timing of one, though.

    Perhaps this man's 3.4 quake actually saved the village from having a 4.0 quake a few years later! Did anyone think of that? Perhaps they should be giving him a medal.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  14. Re:A Learning Experience - by igny · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just imagine the other inmates, 'So, what are you in for?'

    Drilling holes with deep penetration. With a ground shaking climax.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra