Slashdot Mirror


Swiss Geologist On Trial For Causing Earthquakes

Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that Markus Haering's company had been working with the authorities in Basel, Switzerland to try to convert the heat in deep-seated rocks into electricity, but the project was suspended in 2006 when drilling triggered earthquakes, one of them with a magnitude of 3.4, leading Haering's company to pay out $9M in damages. Haering's team planned to drill a series of holes penetrating up to 3 miles (4.8 km) underground with water being pumped onto rocks with a temperature of more than 195C. Basel's location on top of a fault line – the upper Rhine trench – had been deliberately chosen because the heat was closer to the Earth's surface. A risk assessment has since shown that the prospect of further quakes is too high to continue drilling in the city. Haering faces up to five years in prison if the judge finds he intentionally damaged property. Haering has admitted the 3.4 magnitude earthquake was stronger than he had expected and that his team 'had very little knowledge of seismicity' before starting to drill, but called the quakes 'a learning process for everyone involved.' Despite Haering's trial, the Swiss appetite for geothermal projects has not diminished. Engineers are beginning preliminary drilling in Zurich to see whether that area was suitable for a similar scheme, and St. Gallen, in eastern Switzerland, plans to start work on its own geothermal project next year. Drilling efforts are being closely watched in the US, where the energy department is sponsoring more than 120 geothermal energy projects in several states."

12 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Here we go... by Philotic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt the geologist is at fault. However, his defense rests on really shaky ground.

  2. No, me! ME! by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blast it, I failed the broadcast take over announcing my intentions for world domination! It was my demostration of my earthquake machine! me, me ME!

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  3. Damages? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These villagers were scamming the poor guy. $9 million in damages from a *3.4* quake? Cripes, a bus crossing in front of my house is close to 3.4... either their houses are made from eggshells, or this is the scam of the century.

    I'd feel terrible if useful research was suspended because of profiteering townsfolk.

  4. US project shut down by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thankfully a project by the same company just north of San Francisco has been shut down. The last thing CA needs is more earthquakes.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/science/earth/12quake.html

  5. Re:A Learning Experience - by Quantos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just imagine the other inmates, 'So, what are you in for?'

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
  6. Hey, it's a good way to get rid of... by mrami · · Score: 5, Funny

    those pesky minarets! Yeppers!

  7. Re:Blahgh by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basel is EGS's "Altamont Pass". Altamont Pass was a wind farm that gave wind turbines their (undeserved) reputation as being bird killers. They built a wind farm right in the middle of a bird flyway, using low, fast-spinning turbines. It was a learning experience; nobody would be stupid enough to do that again.

    It's the same thing with EGS and earthquakes. In Basel, they deliberately fractured an active fault that had previously destroyed the city. Nobody is going to be dumb enough to do that again.

    --
    Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
  8. Re:Blahgh by pileated · · Score: 4, Funny

    When it comes to being dumb, never say never!

  9. Re:Blahgh by svtdragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody is going to be dumb enough to do that again.

    I bet somebody once said that about people rebuilding cities on top of active faults.

  10. Re:Blahgh by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I respectfully disagree. After living in the pacific northwest and experiencing numerous earthquakes firsthand, I can say with some authority that any structure built in a tectonically active region that cannot safely handle a 3.4 magnitude earthquake was built improperly.

    There were several 3.5ish earthquakes in Oregon where I lived over the last 20 years and as far as I know, broken picture frames were the extent of the damage. Geothermal energy production only makes sense in places where volcanic or tectonic activity is likely. It's not without risk either.

    It seems obvious that there was no intentional earthquake caused, but that was the natural result of fracturing the fault and 3.4 hardly sounds noteworthy. However, more detailed seismic study seems warranted before moving forward with any such project in the future.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  11. impossible by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't "cause" an earthquake. They are caused by tectonic pressure. You may be able to adjust the timing of one, though.

    Perhaps this man's 3.4 quake actually saved the village from having a 4.0 quake a few years later! Did anyone think of that? Perhaps they should be giving him a medal.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  12. Re:Blahgh by maugle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In fact, the city should be grateful. Much better to have a magnitude 3.4 quake now, than to let the stress in the fault line accumulate until it breaks out in the form of a magnitude 8.0 quake.