Slashdot Mirror


Best Man Rigs Newlyweds' Bed To Tweet During Sex

When an UK man was asked to be the best man at a friend's wedding he agreed that he would not pull any pranks before or during the ceremony. Now the groom wishes he had extended the agreement to after the blessed occasion as well. The best man snuck into the newlyweds' house while they were away on their honeymoon and placed a pressure-sensitive device under their mattress. The device now automatically tweets when the couple have sex. The updates include the length of activity and how vigorous the act was on a scale of 1-10.

41 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. First by SparafucileMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    First!

    130KG. 45 seconds.

    1. Re:First by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd look kinda goofy all by yourself. I think it was a pressure sensor made for Two.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      nah this one you gotta come last to win.

  2. Beowulf by jmcbain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Beowulf by nametaken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gross.

  3. Double blinded sex by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately (well, maybe fortunately) all parties in this hack are anonymous. Otherwise, the new groom could rig up an automatic bed bouncing machine and become a sexual legend of Web 3.0.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  4. Like most Twitter feeds... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this feed won't be updated much after a few months.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by shri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, lets hope it does not get updated every time the husband is on the golf course. :)

  5. It'll be even more hillarious by shadowblaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the device starts tweeting while the husband is at work.

    1. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about a sudden decrease/increase in the measured weight ? That would be entertaining too.

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  6. Only one sensor? by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best man snuck into the newlyweds' house while they were away on their honeymoon and placed a pressure-sensitive device under their mattress.

    So it only measures sex on the bed. How boring is that? That leaves out the walls, floor, couch, kitchen counter, pool table, the whole rest of the house and car sex un-Tweeted.

    And, if you're Tiger Woods, the private jet, the yacht and the putting green.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Only one sensor? by DinDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That leaves out the walls, floor, couch, kitchen counter, pool table, the whole rest of the house and car sex

      Ah yes, first stage of sex in a marriage.

      Second stage is after a few years, pretty much confined to the bedroom.

      Third stage kicks in around twelve or fifteen years. That's where you pass each other in the hallway and say "Fuck you!"

    2. Re:Only one sensor? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Third stage kicks in around twelve or fifteen years. That's where you pass each other in the hallway and say "Fuck you!"

      Way to ruin a good punch-line

      You're supposed to say "Hall Sex", and only after you get the "wtf is Hall Sex" look, explain it.

  7. Hmm by ShooterNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how does the device work? For instance, how are these weight measurements being made? If you just put a load cell under the middle of the bed, it isn't going to measure the total mass. You'd need to use 4 load cells - one at each corner of the mattress. And the Mattress has to have a frame, like a box spring. Or you could use 1 load cell, but you'd have to build a special framework under the bed for it.

    The next part is how do you translate these weight and vibration readings into a "sex detector". Where do you set the threshold, such that if someone just rolls over or even flops on the bed it doesn't set it off? Lots of ordinary acts, from scratching an itch to sitting up might create vibrations in the system that would fool a simple script into detecting "sex".

    Plus, some sex acts create a lot more vibration that others. Position also matters quite a bit.

    This is an interesting problem. I think it's solvable, to a reasonable level of accuracy. But you'd have to calibrate the system, which would require something that most slashdotters don't have access to....

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This. This is why I read Slashdot.

    2. Re:Hmm by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you need to detect extended signal within that band...

      Um, aren't they British?

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This? This is why I read Slashdot?

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Figure peak, average, and maybe std deviation of the frequency/ampitude spectrum recored for the "event" and use those numbers to do your "grading".

      Std deviation? Thats gonna be a bit more invasive that just hiding a load balancer under the bed!

    5. Re:Hmm by Sifonki · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as they are married, STD deviation should remain minimal.

  8. Sounds interesting... by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, I want one, that sounds awesome. I wouldn't have it tweet when I'm having sex, but I'd probably keep some sort of online log that would graph the weight, volume, temperature (though that might be greatly skewed by the friction of the mattress constantly rubbing against the device) and if I can have motion sensors I'd have it log "the motion of the ocean."

    Not that the data would serve much purpose other than to say "Hey check out what I made."

    1. Re:Sounds interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's something to put in the baby book...

  9. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've rigged my finger to tweet when it's pulled.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Re:Um... by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

    I highlighted the word that might shed some light on the situation ;)

    Yes, I'm going to hell......

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  11. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a use for Twitter!

  12. Re:Um... by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hah! Further proof of the secret buggy whip manufacturer conspiracy!

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  13. 1-10 isn't good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    For newlyweds it should go to 11.

  14. my wife is an odd duck by Coraon · · Score: 5, Funny

    When she read the article her first words were "Where do we get one of those?" O.o

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:my wife is an odd duck by mqduck · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not quite sure if she will take kindly to being called a duck

      I take offense to that!

      --
      Property is theft.
  15. Re:False positives by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how many low-intensity sex sessions are actually false positives caused by tossing and turning.

    But doesn't that count as foreplay?

  16. "Everybody Knows".... by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    there's gonna be a meter on your bed, that will disclose.. what everybody knows!..

    never thought it would be LITERAL.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  17. Re:Um... by daveime · · Score: 5, Funny

    1kg of the stuff ? I find that a bit hard to swallow !

  18. Re:Um... by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep practicing!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  19. Re:Um... by lul_wat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Um. This is kind of awkward to tell you. You don't usually wear clothes while having sex.

    --
    Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
  20. Re:Um... by Deisatru · · Score: 5, Funny

    1kg of the stuff ? I find that a bit hard to swallow !

    Thats what she said!

  21. Re:Um... by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Three-way! Kinky.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  22. Re:False positives by bronney · · Score: 2, Funny

    wait a minute.. you're saying tossing and turning on a bed with someone isn't sex??! Damn it I thought I scored.

  23. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yikes. You're quite the bitter loser.

  24. Re:Um... by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fact that she's still able to speak is a miracle of evolution.

  25. Good use of twitter by uneek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, this is really evil

  26. Let's hope... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that it only goes off when they're both at home...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  27. tweet frequency by drmitch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oddly enough, the frequency of tweeting on the account is dropping like a rock.