Ginkgo Doesn't Improve Memory Or Cognitive Skills
JumperCable writes "Ginkgo biloba has failed — again — to live up to its reputation for boosting memory and brain function. Just over a year after a study showed that the herb doesn't prevent dementia and Alzheimer's disease, a new study from the same team of researchers has found no evidence that ginkgo reduces the normal cognitive decline that comes with aging. In the new study, the largest of its kind to date, DeKosky and his colleagues followed more than 3,000 people between the ages of 72 and 96 for an average of six years. Half of the participants took two 120-milligram capsules of ginkgo a day during the study period, and the other half took a placebo. The people who took ginkgo showed no differences in attention, memory, and other cognitive measures compared to those who took the placebo, according to the study, which was published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association."
These euro-centric "scientists" can't see pas their narrow-minded blinders to tap into the millenia of cultural experience embodied in Eastern medical and spiritual traditions. The point is, Gingko Baloba has a very potent effect when added to the labels of alternative medical products, causing them to fly off the shelves in exchange for cash. Western medicine is just jealous and probably racist and sexist against peoples like me.
UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
Yes but was it ORGANIC Kinkgo?? That is the question! This test was obviously conducted by real doctors who don't want us to know the truth about the power of eating weeds that grow in exotic jungles.
I bet the herbal supplements industry is hoping its customers will forget all about this report eventually... :)
Aspirin or Ginko?
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/ginkgo-biloba-000247.htm
Better concentration (some subjects thinking that that is one of the memory functions) could be a side effect of them not having headaches due to hypertension. Sample set yadi yada and so on.... statistics and damned lies.
People say the same about crystal meth
Or perhaps it's best put, wonders often never materialize in the first place. Is anyone really surprised that something sold with a big "these claims have not been evaluated by the FDA" on the bottle has, in fact, been found to do nothing close to the claim?
Hopefully herbal viagra is next, and some day spammers will be emailing about things people actually can use...*
*(warning the claims in this post have not been evaluated by the FDA)
The same thing that the color black is good for. Selling stuff to people.
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Well, that or you just assume that's the effect it will have on you, and so you behave accordingly.
But, hey, who am I to argue with a placebo effect that works for you?
The "These claims have not been evaluated by the FDA" and its close friend "This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." are generally a signal that the product is sold as a "dietary supplement" or "nutritional supplement".
Thanks to DSHEA, the FDA legally can't do jack about it unless they have direct evidence of a given product causing serious harm(and their budget for going on epidemiological expeditions for that sort of thing isn't much to write home about).
Whether you consider this a shining beacon of freedom, or an ignoble nest of quacks, it seems likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.
You know what they call alternative medicine that works?.... Medicine.
Cue the "but it worked in my case" replies...
Ginkgo Balboa is clinically proven to improve your boxing skills...
"Our bear makes other people more beautiful to you"
Is that a Care Bear, or what kind of bear, exactly?
Track your TV Shows with your iPhone - FREE
Not to say the results of this particular study are necessarily bogus, but sure makes one wonder.
Big pharma dislikes "natural", as in often unpatentable, treatments; discourages their use.
Ron
Never mind then that Vitamin C (arguably an 'unrefined plant material') has the odd effect of making you *not get scurvy and die* as a result of a daily dosage of around 100mg.
Relatively small doses of simple things can affect you in lots of interesting ways. Look at medication that treats thyroid disorders; it's a simple material (although it doesn't grow on trees) dosed out in *micrograms*, the slightest variation of which (less than 15 micrograms for some people, myself included) your body WILL feel the difference of.
Most things, sure, your body sends in one end and it comes out the other relatively unchanged. Certain things, though, are profoundly influential.
I just can't get up the energy to take a pill every day. Do you think they could make a pill that makes me motivated to take pills?
Your post seems to say that drugs that work on younger people generally don't work on older people, or people with health problems. Can you give some other examples of this general rule? Maybe some other scientific studies?
I think that your father's boot is used for that. It's an anal suppository.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
Ginkgo Balboa is clinically proven to improve your boxing skills...
And Ginko Bilboa is clinically proven to get you there and back again.
Kwisatz Haderach
Sell the spice to CHOAM
This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
As somebody else above has said, plant extracts are not a concentrated source of anything. Which means you're probably better off comparing the effects of 120mg of freshly squeezed orange juice on scurvy than 100mg of vitamin C.
No doubt, you are correct. Very small dosages of certain vitamins and minerals can affect the body greatly. But very small dosages of naturally-occurring, unpurified, untreated, otherwise minimally processed things probably don't.
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."