Slashdot Mirror
M.U.L.E. Is Back
jmp_nyc writes "The developers at Turborilla have remade the 1983 classic game M.U.L.E. The game is free, and has slightly updated graphics, but more or less the same gameplay as the original version. As with the original game, up to four players can play against each other (or fewer than four with AI players taking the other spots). Unlike the original version, the four players can play against each other online. For those of you not familiar with M.U.L.E., it was one of the earliest economic simulation games, revolving around the colonization of the fictitious planet Irata (Atari spelled backwards). I have fond memories of spending what seemed like days at a time playing the game, as it's quite addictive, with the gameplay seeming simpler than it turns out to be. I'm sure I'm not the only Slashdotter who had a nasty M.U.L.E. addiction back in the day and would like a dose of nostalgia every now and then."
There was a video of a Scandinavian chick sucking the dick of a M.U.L.E.
It blew a voluminous load in her mouth and caused her to choke.
Just downloaded it....COOL...but where's the intro and intro music??? It was 8-bit sweetness on the C=64.
Glad somebody did it though!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6L6MhSgpgo
Some of the best home computer music of the time. This song is the number 1 reason I fire up SIDplay (followed closely by many things by David Whittaker).
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
Used to play M.U.L.E. on the Atari 800.... downloading it now :)
I spent a lot of time playing this on the NES. I don't suppose this version includes the cheesy computer voices though?
This Space Intentionally Left Blank
As much I like the Original M.U.L.E., I cant go on downloadign and playing this game.
Considering the Fact that these new holders of the name Ozark Softscape were not norn while the game was made and did (alongside their mother) abandon Dani Bunten Barren after her transformation I'd like people to show their respect to original author and tell these **** to get lost.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Bunten_Berry
http://anticlockwise.com/dani/
I've read many times how big an affect it had on games, but I don't really care for Sim type games...
So I ask my (MUCH) older fellow geeks, is this really worth the time to learn to play it?
Please don't use anonymity as an excuse for being a butt head >:(
...not Dan Bunten. She made it clear.
Camping on quad since 1996.
I still run the NES version of MULE, not quite as classic as the C64 version, but the improved sound and graphics are a big plus. I run an emulator for the NES version, and you can play it multiplayer over the net as well, so I don't really see the need for another remake.
I play the planetMule version of MULE, and I can confirm that is still a awesome game. MULE has this ability to make you play crazy in 2 turns, 3 turns... Is a deep game, and you meet different skills and ideas about how to play. The planetMULE version is both tryiing to make a faithfull version (and is a SUCCESS as that), and make tiny improvements that don't change the gameplay.
RECOMENDED!!!
-Woof woof woof!
M.U.L.E is one of the greats! - used to play it all the time on my C64, who needs more than 64k!
What a great game and great remake. The updated graphics are actually a little easier to make out than the original.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
http://www.codenautics.com/openmule/ ... although development appears to have stalled in 1997.
Upgrade graphics, but on web site no screenshot.
This was one of my favorite games in college on the C-64. I expected to find a slim flash game, instead it's a 36Mb installer (Win). A bit better on Max/Linux (16Mb), but still, WTF? I'm guessing these guys used to make printer drivers for HP.
Whoever tagged this story with "Foundation" is my hero for the day ...unless they weren't referring to the Asimov novels. If that's the case, they should burn for teasing me like that.
Kudos to them for releasing it as freeware, as opposed to releasing it onto a DRM enabled platform like Steam or worse, Xbox Live.
Freedom is drinking a beer in the park when you're supposed to be at work.
MULE is a strategic economic simulator for 4 players. A long game (12 turns) take about 90 minutes.
The first thing you will see wen you join, is the surface of the planet. The surface is divided into "plots", that later can be taken by the players. You will put "mules" (multi use labor element robots) in these plots to craft raw metal (smithore), precious luxuries (cristite), energy or food. Your mules to work need energy, you need food or you will be unable to manage your mules.
First phase, a cursor move trough the planet, simply pressing space take a plot. The "river" plots are specially good for food, the desert for energy, and the mountains for smithore.
Next phase, the players move his character, and have the option to take a mule, and move it to a specialization house (energy, food, smithore...) then move that mule to his plot, and press space again to place the mule.
After all players have placed his mules, theres a "production" phase. You will produce based on your mule type, type of terrain, and some economy of scale bonus.
Next phase is selling/buying. You need to secure energy, if you don't have, and food, if you want to place mules.
The tournamente mode (somewhat like the 'full experience') is 12 complete turns of this. With some random bonus and malus events for the players.
The game is some sort of economic sandbox, most people "play to win", but is possible to "play to make the colony a success".
More info:
http://www.planetmule.com/forum?topic=379.0
-Woof woof woof!
Are you kidding? Even the Amiga conversion looked better, in effing 1990.
Hmm... If it uses lwjgl, its java based... so why not just have a downloadable and executable jar?
Still, gives lax coders like me hope.
The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
OK so maybe some aspects of the game are more plausible than others.
I personally did a port (download here) of an earlier rewrite (though the site I got it from is gone) back in 2005. It's a pretty decent version, as far as I can tell, though honestly I didn't play the original hardly at all. The main drawback is local multiplayer only...
"Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
Rose-Colored nostalgia, +1.
Yes, I played MULE. I also played Doom, and going before that I played Empire, Sword of Aragon, Ancient Art of War, Star Viking, Star Raiders, Wizardry, Ultima, and Oregon Trail (on a MECC line terminal) as well as a host of other games that are stored fondly in my nostalgia-vault as 'awesome games'.
But do you know what? My suggestion is DON'T PLAY THEM AGAIN. Like watching the original Star Wars, the memory of "greatness" is tied inextricably with context - the state of tech of the time, my age, and the whole novelty of the thing. They don't age very well.
Go to the abondonware sites, you can (thankfully) find all these games - play them, and then you can (if you're honest) admit "Meh, this is unappealing". Yes, diehards will whinge about 'gameplay over graphics' and to a point that's true; but ultimately that's not the whole story - there are a heck of a lot of advances in things other than graphics that go a LONG way toward making a game fun: credible AI that's not easily gamed, UI usability, ease of patching, online play, and (usually) a whole host of rationalizations that we accepted at the time because it was such a huge step forward from where we'd been, and it was cool just to be using a computer in the FIRST place.
I'm not saying that these games weren't great IN THEIR TIME. They were. But, like these ancient much-remembered games, just because my grandpa was cool doesn't mean I need to drag his corpse out and re-animate him today because I've got no ideas of my own.
-Styopa
I still load this up in an emulator every once in a while. but it's hard to get the keys to work properly.... this makes me giddy with happiness.
What's up with this box everyone has to think inside of or outside of? Why does there have to be a box?
Wow...M.U.L.E. is definitely one of my favorite games of all time.
Remember playing it for hours and hours with friends in college.
I remember M.U.L.E. being the place where I first learned about (and heard the word) "Collusion".
Hunting the wumpus, trying to get the mountainous regions to get crystite...
And the only true way to play was the long 90 minute 12 turn game.
Agile Spaceport - You will never find a more wretched hive of scrum and villainy. We must be cautious.
That's all I have to say. One of the actual PURCHASED games I had for the C=64. Good Times.
Gotta go hunt down a Wumpus.
"A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!"
OMG, the best video game in history is back!
only slightly off topic, but if you ever come across the version of MULE released for the IBM PCjr, waaaay back when, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make it available on the interwebnets. it is so incredibly rare and needs to be archived before it fades away forever.
On the contrary, I think that most if not all transgender people and those who appreciate transgender issues would have a problem with the way this is being handled.
The standard etiquette for referring to a transgender person is to use the name and pronouns they prefer, even when referring to the past. If you don't know the person's preference, use the pronouns that correspond to how they live publicly. This, as well as being the courteous and respectful thing to do, is also agreed upon by the Associated Press Stylebook.
It's the same courtesy we give anyone when they change their name, except that in these cases you're changing the pronouns, too. For example, everyone refers to Laura Bush as Laura Bush, not Laura Welch, even if you're talking about her childhood. If you need to clarify, you still treat the person's current name as the primary name, as in "Laura Bush (born Laura Welch) fell off the swing when she was 5."
The difference is that with transgender people, it's a bigger deal to disrespect their name and pronoun change. It's effectively saying "I don't care what gender you think you are, I know better than you." That's incredibly insulting, demeaning, and disempowering.
It's understandable to be confused the first time you encounter a transgender person, because in over 99% of the population, sex and gender match one-to-one, and they're static final. I mean, they don't ever change. (: So it's understandable to assume that it's a one-to-one unchanging relationship -- until you find a counterexample. At that point, how do you adjust your worldview? Do you dogmatically stick to your view that sex and gender must match one-to-one and must never change? Or do you expand your worldview to account for the counterexamples? It seems to me that both the scientific method and human kindness suggest the latter.
For idealists who want to change the world and are looking for a path with heart. http://connection-revolution.com
I'd be set!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_Blazer
http://bringerp.free.fr/forum/viewforum.php?f=2
+0 Meh