Slashdot Mirror


Boxee Opens Beta To All

DeviceGuru writes "Boxee has quietly moved its long-awaited Beta release onto its public download site, reports OpenBoxeeBox.com. The new version of this free Internet- and local- A/V streaming player currently supports PCs running Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes, with an Apple TV version coming soon. Key enhancements include a vastly redesigned homescreen and new global menu, which collectively make it much quicker to locate content, an improved search function that now treats online and local media equivalently, so you can locate and play movie or TV show titles much faster, plus — at long last — a fully functional Netflix instant-downloads player appears in the Windows version (but not in the Linux version). Also of significance is that Boxee's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX, allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration. The free public Boxee Beta A/V player software is available on Boxee's website."

163 comments

  1. The article forgot to mention by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2, Informative

    It supports not only Windows XP, but Vista and 7, but only 32-bit versions.

    In contrast it supports Ubuntu 64-bit.

    1. Re:The article forgot to mention by jwietelmann · · Score: 5, Informative

      It supports not only Windows XP, but Vista and 7, but only 32-bit versions.

      In contrast it supports Ubuntu 64-bit.

      To clarify, you can absolutely run 32-bit Boxee on a 64-bit version of Windows, so it technically supports 64-bit Windows Vista and 7. They just don't provide a native 64-bit version of Boxee.

    2. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have source: will 64'it

    3. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's only 64bit native support is for Ubuntu, as 64bit ubuntu does not play nice with native 32bit apps like windows and mac.

    4. Re:The article forgot to mention by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      I'm probably feeding a troll, but suffice it to say that that's blatantly false.

    5. Re:The article forgot to mention by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is how Ubuntu 64-bit and OS X are supported if it's using DirectX?

      I also don't like the sound of "online and local media being treated equally". That just sounds like it's going to make sorting and locating my local network media much harder, which is the main reason I use Boxee.

      Currently I'm using it on an Apple TV so this isn't quite available to me yet anyways, but depending on how they handle this I may just opt go install XBMC and use that. I've used that on my Xbox with great success.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably feeding a troll, but suffice it to say that that's blatantly false.

      i use 32 bit apps in 64bit OS every day. in fact, i'm doing it right now

    7. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the key word was nice. you can't just slap in the deb for 32bit boxee in 64bit ubuntu. I did manage to get it in by building a 32bit sandbox and I'm sure there are other ways. but it was not "nice" and easy.

      and if I come off as a troll, I did not mean to.

    8. Re:The article forgot to mention by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'll chime in and say that I have run into library hell trying to get a 32-bit app to run on 64-bit Ubuntu. It's always due to poor programming looking into hard-coded paths like /usr/lib for the 32-bit libraries, but it happens more than you think.

    9. Re:The article forgot to mention by cl0s · · Score: 1

      The 'treated equally' is only in the search... if I understand the article correctly. Browsing should still be similar.

    10. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always due to poor programming looking into hard-coded paths like /usr/lib for the 32-bit libraries, but it happens more than you think.

      What is the proper way to do it?

    11. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't exactly seem like the type of app that needs more then 4 Gig of ram

    12. Re:The article forgot to mention by macshit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the presence or absence of 32-bit libraries is the main issue when trying to run 32-bit apps on a 64-bit linux system.

      It's a huge annoyance for the distro maintainers -- should they include/package 32-bit versions of every library on their 64-bit port, just to support a few random proprietary software makers who are too lazy/incompetent to compile a 64-bit version? If not, which libraries need 32-bit versions? etc.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    13. Re:The article forgot to mention by HermMunster · · Score: 0, Troll

      It isn't a beta product. It is still alpha. And alpha it is with tons of problems. They need to hire some usability testers because they made some aweful mistakes that only a programmer would do. As Dave Thomas says ... they hired hackers.

      If Boxee is to make it to retail in products they need a lot more work. I used boxee from the time it was released to Alpha more than a year ago and it has been trimmed back as to what features it allows.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    14. Re:The article forgot to mention by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      Are you a moron Mr. AC? STFU when you don't know what you are talking about.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    15. Re:The article forgot to mention by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      They support OpenGL unless it is on Windows, then it is DX9, or some variation of it.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    16. Re:The article forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the proper way to do it?

      Properly linking your application and letting the linker daemon find the library for you based on its configured library paths.

      As opposed to writing your own linking routines that only work on your computer. Yes, it's really neat that you wrote a program that looks to see if you have libgtk or libqt and uses either, now either fix it or make it a compile-time ./configure option.

    17. Re:The article forgot to mention by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      they made some aweful mistakes that only a programmer would do.

      But saying what they are would allow the programmers to fix them (or at least other programmers who care about usability to learn from them), and then who would hire the usability testers?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    18. Re:The article forgot to mention by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Yes because that's the only purpose for 64bit apps.

    19. Re:The article forgot to mention by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      My point is that you never give a programmer a screwdriver or a hammer. This is an old adage. Programmers tend to blame the computer or the user over obvious defects in their code.

      As well, programmers should not be allowed to program willy nilly. You need someone to manage. It is obvious that the project was done by hackers as Dave Thomas has clearly stated they hired hackers to do the job.

      The product shows obvious signs of issues where they let the programmer come up with the solution and the programmer bias exists en-mass. Portions need to be completely redone because they seriously lack ease of use features. Not to mention those mistakes are obvious deal breakers for consumers of an electronic appliance like Boxee's box by dlink.

      So, please, no, the programmer should be coding what is designed and thus would not be solving the problem themselves.

      As I said, I have used this for a long time and it is an Alpha product. Even their website still claims it is an alpha product.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  2. Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player? This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far.

    1. Re:Damn it. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you're pissed at linux about Moonlight not doing Netflix well? Shouldn't you be pissed that Netflix doesn't ensure their player works on Moonlight, and therefore linux?

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:Damn it. by xSauronx · · Score: 1, Informative

      ive about given up on linux for the time being. i love some things about it, and used it for a while. but between school and entertainment...its just not worth booting into. i cant watch my blu ray movies, streaming netflix movies, play my games, or run visual studio and dreamweaver properly in WINE. office 2007 worked at one point. in addition, when i tried debian it was a bitch to get my hardware going....when i tried ubuntu, hardware worked but getting sleep or hibernate was iffy, nevermind the other issues i already mentioned.

      its just not a good fit for me right now. i wish it was, i far prefer compiz to the interface of windows 7.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    3. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When sufficient bribes are paid?

      Moonlight probably could support the Netflix player, except for the DRM code wedged in that specifically blocks non-supported clients.

    4. Re:Damn it. by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      -1, really lame troll.

      Why didn't you tell us about the file transfer speed of your NT4 workstation while you were at it ?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    5. Re:Damn it. by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      or at least pissed with the Moonlight developers for not ensuring it can handle the the Netflix player, and therefore Linux.

    6. Re:Damn it. by jank1887 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      oh... just saw the comment below about DRM specifically whacking unsupported clients. didn't realize it wasn't just a compatibility issue. What would it take to get the Moonlight developers to contact/work with the Netflix developers on that point? (i'm guessing a miracle)

    7. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you're not allowed to dislike Linux on Slashdot?

      Wait, what am I saying? Of course you can't.

    8. Re:Damn it. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      visual studio

      All OS, text editor, and compiler zealotry aside... WTF???

      If you are doing Windows development, you should be doing it in Windows. Expecting Linux to work for you if the tasks you need to preform are distinctly Windows related is just nuts. Use the right tool for the job.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    9. Re:Damn it. by tepples · · Score: 1

      What would it take to get the Moonlight developers to contact/work with the Netflix developers on that point?

      For a public company, half the market capitalization is a fairly reliable upper bound. At the current stock price of Nasdaq:NFLX, a 51% stake would cost 1.44 billion USD.

    10. Re:Damn it. by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, people disagreeing with you is not a troll. At worst they're just wrong. In this case, though, he's absolutely right. I also gave up on linux recently, largely due to issues similar to his. I really wanted to use it as my full-time OS, and I went for about 2 months without booting into windows even once. In the long run, though, the numerous small deficiencies (combined with a X-server memory leak that nobody seemed to know how to fix) were just too much to put up with. Windows 7 works out of the box, and doesn't go out of it's way to frustrate me on a regular basis. I can't say the same for any flavor of Linux. They have their uses, but as a full time desktop OS they've still got some work to do.

    11. Re:Damn it. by Seq · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling, but in reverse. I acquired a copy of Windows 7 recently, and decided to try it out. I couldn't find a mail client I like, and am far to used to having a CLI there. I tried a somewhat buggy evolution port, cygwin, and a coLinux system before giving up for the same reasons you are, I'm just used to what I'm used to, and changing platforms is difficult.

      It worked out the same with hardware too. Everything works in Ubuntu (and I'm looking forward to it working better when nouveau starts shipping and I can get xrandr). Windows wouldn't even shut down, let alone suspend or hibernate. It seemed to shut down, but would stay on, while suspend would resume the machine immediately. Turns out I had to manually play with some setting on a firewire card or something (kind of weird since it was a microsoft-provided IEE-1394 driver, afaict).

      There are some things I wish were easier on Linux systems, too. Having to rip HD-DVD and BluRays before watching them takes time and a lot of disk space. Being a second-class citizen when it comes to graphics and wireless drivers is somewhat of a pain. I also wish I could play some games (especially ones that I paid for expecting a Linux client "soon". I'm looking at you, UT3/Epic), but I've been getting around this by buying older ones from GOG.com and the steam sale which do work in dosbox and wine.

      I'm hoping that projects such as Boxee bring a legitimacy to linux-based home media centres that Mythtv never managed to convey beyond the userbase, so at least one person, somewhere in the chain of decision-making might say "Hey, maybe silverlight isn't such a good idea". Ah, but I dream, I suppose.

      I can't comment on Netflix. Unsupported Linux user is an upgrade from unsupported Canadian.

      --
      -- Seq
    12. Re:Damn it. by Tikkun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are lots of really awesome things about Linux. Running proprietary software and supporting DRM infested platforms are not among them.

    13. Re:Damn it. by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Redundant

      +...no but rattling off a whole lot of proprietary apps when whining about Linux is a bit moronic.

      Linux doesn't support proprietary Windows apps. Next you will be whining that MacOS doesn't either.

      Oh the horror.

      Any rant that includes Visual Studio can safely be ignored.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:Damn it. by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      If you are doing Windows development, you should be doing it in Windows. Expecting Linux to work for you if the tasks you need to preform are distinctly Windows related is just nuts. Use the right tool for the job.

      Reminds me about a Win32/C++ project in university, around 2000. They made us use Borland tools, which back then worked (more-or-less) perfectly in Wine. Even creating and running executables. Completed the project on Linux without a problem.

      Of course you are correct if you need visual studio for your day-job, but if you are still learning I'm all for trying what is possible. Linux has come a long way.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    15. Re:Damn it. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I can't say I'm completely innocent either, I have done some cross-compiling on linux for windows with mingw. Such things will always be possible but developing on linux with windows tools is missing the point entirely I think.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    16. Re:Damn it. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player? This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far."

      Not gunna happen. Microsoft and Netflix have a VERY cozy relationship. I believe one of the Microsoft board members is also on the Netflix board. Not sure who and the Wiki entry doesn't state who.

      Until these two companies part ways, Microsoft is going to be making things difficult for SOMEONE.
       

    17. Re:Damn it. by futuresheep · · Score: 1

      It's Reed Hastings, the founder of Netflix.

    18. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He said it wasn't a fit for him because it doesn't run the apps he needs/prefers. There's nothing "moronic" about that, nor was any part of his post "whining". You're just furious because he dares to have tastes that differ from yours, so much so that you felt the need to lie about what he said.

    19. Re:Damn it. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So you're not allowed to dislike Linux on Slashdot?

      You can, so long as you compare it to OS X.

    20. Re:Damn it. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Of course you are correct if you need visual studio for your day-job, but if you are still learning I'm all for trying what is possible.

      If you're still learning, it's even worse. Now when something doesn't work, you don't know if it's because you did something wrong, or because of some unsupported (or incorrectly implemented) functionality in Wine.

    21. Re:Damn it. by westlake · · Score: 1

      There are lots of really awesome things about Linux. Running proprietary software and supporting DRM infested platforms are not among them.

      The Windows user doesn't give a damn about the purity of your development model or licensing.

      Why should he? His platform is agnostic.

      Damn near everything in FOSS is his for the asking. But so is the best-of-breed in commercial and proprietary software at every price point.

      When the Windows user clicks on the movie the movie plays.

      That is the practical meaning of DRM, whether the program is delivered through your home PC or the set top box with its embedded Linux OS.

      The geek may be prepared to spend endless hours trying to find a "free" solution. The right codec. The right player. The right file.

      If he valued his time at minimum wage he might as well be doing his shopping at WalMart.

    22. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you had exactly the same problems as me, I've just fixed the MBR for XP from a failed Debian install in which I could not get an intel NIC to properly connect to anything come on, ubuntu it's cool and all but suspend it's a bitch and it's getting bloated, puppy it's a very nice distro and hardware support it's fine, would like to be an install tool that obey your commands and does not fucking rape your HD.

      Sigh, this is frustration not hate, I love Linux but I value my time. Lets see: if I use a Mac I'm a locked down fag, If I use Linux I'll be wasting a lot of time and if I use Windows not only I will be a locked fag but I'll be losing time and money too :/ OSs suck.

      I'd be posting non Anon but I've moderated, I give a fuck about troll mods, this is IT land 2k10! wintel will kill ARM, shills will kill google on the desktop and 7 seven will secure another 10 years of monopoly for MS.. move you fricken asses Linux devs, put your shit together I DON'T WANT A BAJZILLION OPTIONS I WANT AN "OUT OF THE BOX" LINUX FOR FUCK SAKES!!!

    23. Re:Damn it. by zoward · · Score: 1

      I went in the opposite direction. I was taking a C++ course, which required us to use Visual Studio and submit our VS source files. I was more interested in learning how to code C/C++ under linux. Since these were console apps, I wrote them using vi and g++ under linux, creating makefiles for them as I went along. I could pretty much drag and drop the code into VS, compile it, and hand it in. My teacher even gave me extra credit for handing in the g++ makefiles!

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    24. Re:Damn it. by RichiH · · Score: 1

      My experience is the same, only vice versa. It boils down to 'use what you are comfortable with.'

    25. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!! u funny lol.... *tears in eyes*... I share an aprtment with a Windows fan (works supporting 2 line windows questions). It was easyer to setup and run the PS3 media center than the Windows Vista/7 xbox media center. And don't get me started on the "the user klicks it plays" bullcrap... and agnostic?.. I don't think you know the meaning of that word - either that or you ARE really rally funny!..

    26. Re:Damn it. by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      There is never a case that can be made in support for DRM, period. Only vendor lock in benefits. The consumer is almost always damaged by DRM, if not now, then in the near future.

      I use linux on my main machine as my primary OS and when I click on a movie it plays. I don't search and tinker with codes or the right player. The right file. It all just works.

      Linux is a huge time saver for me and a big budget saver as well.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    27. Re:Damn it. by melstav · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't between Moonlight and Netflix.

      The problem is that Microsoft isn't allowing Moonlight access to the PlayReady DRM SDK used by Silverlight. Which means Moonlight can't play any DRM'ed files. Which means Moonlight can't play netflix content, despite really wanting to.

      Here is a thread on Microsoft's Silverlight forum discussing the matter.

    28. Re:Damn it. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...which ultimately gives the appearance of Microsoft "playing nice" with Linux when they really aren't.

      Linux is still made to be a 2nd class citizen when it comes to Microsoft "standards".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    29. Re:Damn it. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      No. His rant is moronic because it is dependent on proprietary apps that are closely tied to one and only one operating system.

      s/Linux/MacOS/g

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    30. Re:Damn it. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you use a Mac, Linux won't be a problem because it is a nice slow moving target.

      The limited nature of Mac hardware doesn't just benefit Apple, it benefits everyone else.

      Much whining occurs about how Apple uses "premium" components but they don't really. All
      of their stuff is pretty mundane and a bit dated actually. This makes a Mac a pretty good
      machine for running any OS on.

      Some bleeding edge GPU? Some bleeding edge motherboard?

      OTOH, I really have a hard time believing that an intel NIC would be problematic under
      Linux unless it wasn't really a NIC at all and was instead was a wifi adaptor (which
      is something else entirely).

      I have always found this "waste my time" rhetoric fascinating. Even in the old days it
      seemed to flatly contradict my own experiences (especially with Windows).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  3. DirectX on Linux? by crow · · Score: 1

    So they're moving to DirectX, but they're also running on Mac and Linux? I don't get it.

    1. Re:DirectX on Linux? by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      VLC has long supported various output APIs, mostly because on different platforms, different APIs have varying levels of driver support and varying performance. I imagine this is similar.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:DirectX on Linux? by Tapewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Abstraction layers.

    3. Re:DirectX on Linux? by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Neither do I, how is going from OpenGL to DirectX an "upgrade" either?

    4. Re:DirectX on Linux? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Windows video drivers often have much better support for DirectX.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:DirectX on Linux? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Not in my experience. My completely anecdotal evidence suggests that OpenGL implementations of the same program have had higher detail at higher framerates for the same application. The summary implies that DirectX is hardwire accelerated while OpenGL is not.

    6. Re:DirectX on Linux? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Probably only for Windows. The problem on Windows (at least XP) that OpenGL is not natively supported by the drivers provided from Microsoft and before that (Windows 95 -> ME) OpenGL was not supported and later supported but boggled/expanded with proprietary calls by Microsoft.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:DirectX on Linux? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You must not have an ATI video card. Their OpenGL drivers have never been very good.

    8. Re:DirectX on Linux? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, I did actually have an Nvidia card the last time I played games that used any significant hardware graphics acceleration. Dwarf fortress does not count, even though it is OpenGL accelerated.

    9. Re:DirectX on Linux? by maxume · · Score: 1

      On my laptop with Intel graphics, using VLC, fullscreen DirectX output uses ~10% of CPU, OpenGL uses something like 40 or 50% (most of a core).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:DirectX on Linux? by unixfan · · Score: 1

      Which makes little sense when you see that even game developers are using OpenGL. (Something is wrong if your CPU is running 40-50%.)

    11. Re:DirectX on Linux? by mmmbeer · · Score: 1

      It is an upgrade because in the Win32 world the API for GPU video decompression acceleration is called DXVA. Note the DX at the beginning. It doesn't stand for OpenGL.

      (Other than adding an additional HD decoder board)

    12. Re:DirectX on Linux? by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      If Intel's OpenGL driver were a food, it would probably be boiled spam, or perhaps a potato soaked in malt vinegar and unceremoniously smashed underfoot before being thrown into a deep fryer and finally coated in chocolate syrup. That explains the performance disparity, and is one reason why Windows leans further toward DirectX every year.

    13. Re:DirectX on Linux? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      So does that mean that Microsoft is forcing the issue?

      Why shouldn't the boxee team be able to use OpenGL and DXVA at the same time?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:DirectX on Linux? by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Must have a GeForce videocard.

      Across the board, if games run in OpenGL and DirectX mode, older GeForces will have a way higher framerate in OpenGL mode. Then you can bump up the res and detail levels.

      I remember in Warcraft III it was so pronounced that my GeForce 2 MX 400 could run everything on Med 800x600, but in OpenGL it managed 1280x1024 with some stuff on high. Radeon users were said to have no difference (both ran like shit), except OpenGL mode also had distorted text at low resolutions.

      And KOTOR, once vertex buffers were disabled, had a rediculously high framerate. It was an OpenGL-only game. The vertex buffers used to drop the framerate to about 5fps (640x480), but once I found the tweak to turn them off I was getting 30fps 1280x1024 8xAA. This was with a 6600, which would slow to a crawl in OpenGL Warcraft III with any AA forced on. A very optimized rendering engine, if you apply the right tweak.

      And even Titan Quest played with max everything on my 7900GS. The Radeons of the time were being crippled. Something about fully dynamic shadows. (Years before Crysis, too :P )

      It's too bad OpenGL has been relegated to the backburner now. It's basically playing catchup with DX10/DX11.

    15. Re:DirectX on Linux? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I expect they just throw up a DirectX window and call the accelerated video player function. It's not like they're rendering anything other than video, like a game would be.

      So "moving to DirectX" probably involves a very small amount of code.

  4. What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&rdquo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This wouldn't work on fedora 12?

    I mean, the kernels are Linux - period. So, I'm not getting why the specification of Ubuntu here.

  5. Best interface ever... by Improv · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really hope the new interface is based on Boxxy.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Best interface ever... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      I would prefer it be based on Boxy Brown.

  6. Re:Great! Now I can watch by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sup dawg, I heard you like 4chan so we put a Boxxy on your Boxee so you can troll while you troll.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  7. Linux 64 Bit Support by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad to see they've finally started offering a native 64 bit version for Linux. Previously, I had been providing patches/scripts to allow folks to compile it themselves on their forums (I'm a moderator on their Linux forum). There's currently a RPM on the Linux forum for Fedora 12, but as I don't run Fedora any more, I can't vouch for it. I have personally compiled the latest Beta on Gentoo ~amd64 and it works fine with some minor tweaks (I plan to submit an ebuild to Gentoo Bug 258082). One thing to note if you do compile from source is that their XULRunner included in the flashplayer portion of their source is missing 64 bit shared objects (this causes flash to break). I've submitted a bug to get the XULRunner updated, but haven't heard anything.

    I've ran the closed Beta for the last month and so far it's very promising. I just wish Boxee's development process was more open.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Linux 64 Bit Support by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a stupid question, so just tell me if so. Is there any chance of getting this running on my PS3 Linux partition? That would radically change things for me (I'm not quite willing to set up a dedicated a/v server). You'd think it would be a perfect target for it. Already in the media cabinet, already hooked up to internet and TV. I would probably cancel my cable TV if it worked well enough.

    2. Re:Linux 64 Bit Support by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a stupid question, so just tell me if so. Is there any chance of getting this running on my PS3 Linux partition? That would radically change things for me (I'm not quite willing to set up a dedicated a/v server). You'd think it would be a perfect target for it. Already in the media cabinet, already hooked up to internet and TV. I would probably cancel my cable TV if it worked well enough.

      Unless things have changed lately, it'll probably be fine if you're happy with 480p output.

      Last time I tried to play a DVD (ISO image) on the PS3, frames were being dropped something fierce because the PS3 wasn't fast enough to decode/scale/display on my 1080p HDTV. The framebuffer had nearly zilch for video accelleration. Plus the loadaverage was much above 1.

      PS3 Linux was a joke and nothing more than a curiousity, really. Plus, at 256MB of RAM (maybe more if you could use the graphics RAM as swap)...

    3. Re:Linux 64 Bit Support by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I have one of the original 60 Gb models so I was able to enable the swap. It might be a joke but it has allowed me to play emulators on my TV using a nice wireless controller so it wasn't a total bust.

  8. GNU/Ubuntu by McGiraf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"

    Not Linux? :)

    So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?

    GNU/Ubuntu sounds weird though.

    1. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      They probably have an Ubuntu .deb packaged, and didn't test for anything else.

    2. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"

      Not Linux? :)

      Nope, not Linux.

      So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?

      Nope, it's just not available to Linux at large. It's not open source. You can download an Ubuntu .deb of the binaries, but if you want to run it another distribution? Sorry, Charlie.

    3. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      RPMs have been installed under Debian for ages using `alien`; isn't there something like that for RPM distros? If not, what's stopping someone from writing it? Or simply extracting the files inside the .deb and repackaging them manually?

    4. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by antdude · · Score: 1

      How about Debian? I was told using Ubuntu's *.deb file is a bad idea in Debian even if Ubuntu is based on Debian. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 0

      Ive been using the .debs from the site for about 6 months now in squeeze. Not a problem at all, and the new interface is very nice.

    6. Re:GNU/Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced they tested the package for Ubuntu.

  9. Totally awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is amazing, fantastic news! I'm overjoyed! Boxee is our queen! :-)

  10. What exactly is boxee good for??? by BurkeTheEldar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have zilch experience with boxee but did spend some time on it's site a couple of weeks ago to see if it might be of utility when viewing tv shows or movies online. For the life of me I could not figure out what its supposed to do 'for me'. The boxee website is a great example of what happens when they people involved are so deeply entrenched in whatever realm boxee is that they have no clue how to communicate to 'regular' people.

    A site like hulu is easy to figure out. But it's got too many commercials and they seem to be adding more all the time. Boxee...someone tell me what it's good for? Like you were explaining to someone who didn't know already???

    1. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lots of experience with 'boxee', as you call it, deeply entrenched.

    2. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boxee gives you a 10 foot interface. It provides a nice interface to websites like Hulu, TV.com, and things like cnet TV.
      It also supports audio and video podcasts and on Windows NetFlix.
      If you want to build a media PC that works more like a set top box than a PC then Boxee is a great program to try.
      They are also pushing a new BoxeeBox which looks really nice. The lack of mass storage and a bit torrent client is a slight downer but for a set top box it looks just about perfect. Well except that case is too cool IMHO. I would like something a bit plainer.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Informative

      Previously the web site had a great intro video that actually explained it fairly well. I'm not quite sure when that was changed, but since I've been running the alpha for roughly a year now, I can try taking a stab at it.

      Boxee's goal is to be a "social media player" where you can watch media from various sources, see what your friends are watching, and let your friends know what you're watching. By "media" it's referring to TV, movies, music, and pictures. The source of most of the content comes from the Internet (although it definitely supports offline and local network content). Boxee provides a framework to create native applications that allow aggregating and viewing of the online media (basically XBMC plugins if you're familiar with that app), for example there's apps for Hulu, Pandora, Flickr, etc. Boxee automatically monitors what you and your friends watch, and allows you to browse the history of it as well. Boxee also offers other cool features like grabbing metadata for local content. E.g. if it detects a ripped copy of Season 1 of The Office, it will grab screen shots and descriptions of each episode from IMDB.

      Personally I've found Boxee's primary benefit is for aggregating media. With the new version, I can search a TV show title and it comes up with all the episodes I can stream regardless of the source (e.g. episodes from Hulu, nbc.com, etc.). I'm not a big fan of the social aspect, but it's not a deal breaker (I just ignore it). So far I've been very impressed with both the alpha and beta releases and would definitely recommend giving the software a go.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    4. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by BurkeTheEldar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess I don't see what the thrill is, exactly. If it's main function is to provide a single interface to 'channels', and I would still have to suffer through endless credit card commercials, then...sigh. Thanks for the input though.

    5. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I echo this... is it supposed to be similar to Plex or Miro? Or is it designed more to stream this amalgamated data to your TV?

      After trying out all three in the past, I've always found Firefox to be a superior method of providing utility without degrading other computer functionality.

      What I really want is a system-wide utility that enqueues anything I feel I want to watch in one or more custom playlists and cleanly starts/pauses/resumes that playlist when requested. So far I do this with VLC and some watch scripts; I keep on coming back to this solution after trying out the other options every time they announce they're improved.

    6. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by BurkeTheEldar · · Score: 1

      That's a really useful explanation of the scope and purpose ...thanks.

    7. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      XBMC gives you a 10 foot interface as well. Boxee on the other hand frustrated my wife something fierce, so I stopped using it. the latest XBMC release absolutely clobbers boxee though if you dont care about any of the social crap or trying to watch youtube and other low grade online media. There is a podcast catcher you can install that grabs the high def podcasts automatically though. She likes that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would suggest also trying XBMC.
      I am sorry to say that my media PC if it is not a BoxeeBox will probably run Windows. I want to put a Bluray player in it and because of the nasty DRM BluRay disks don't work on Linux.
      I too am a big fan of Podcasts but YouTube isn't bad sometimes. I will have to give XBMC a try.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well life is full of choices. Boxee also gives you a 10 foot interface for any digital media you happen to have on your network, Pandora, CNet TV, NPR, and GeekBrief.tv
      It may not be anything you want to hook up but as I said if you want a MediaPC I think Boxee is worth a look. If you lean to the FOSS side then try XBMC.
      But if you have no desire to have a media PC then you have no interest in Boxee.
      Oh and it also has a twitter client.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent troll.

    11. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      Will Boxee be a good media PC application if you don't plan on streaming everything?

      eg: if most of my content is on harddrives accessible over the LAN?

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    12. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes but so would XBMC. The thing is that I really like some podcasts. The ones from Cnet are actually very entertaining as well as EnGadget and Geekbrief.tv and yes XBMC will do those for you as well. They are both free so I would suggest trying them both.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Boxee's a fork of XBMC, with "a new look and social flair". Kinda like Flock vs Firefox (anyone remember Flock?)

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    14. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Great summary, thanks. Now, a question, and I'm not being a smartass: is there any good software that does the exact opposite? I absolutely do not care about the built in social aspects of the software, nor do I use services like Hulu. (Internet connection and computers at home are on the slow side.) I do, however, have an extensive collection of video from various sources--ripped DVDs, captured from a TV card, etc. I just want something that lets me browse this with a good "ten foot interface" and do other useful things. (Playlists, searchable, etc.) I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful. Any suggestions?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      I disagree. That was actually pretty funny.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    16. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plex - http://www.plexapp.com/

    17. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Exactly the post I was hoping to find. Thanks :-)

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    18. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      http://xbmc.org/

      I've only seen it used on someone's old Xbox, but it looked pretty good, and thus I'm about to install it on the new storage box I'm building.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    19. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boxee is a fork of XBMC, and is primarly focused on adding the 'social' bits. XBMC itself sounds like exactly what you want.

    20. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Just a wild stab: were you looking at boxee.tv as a website to view videos like hulu.com (since you compare it to hulu)? That's not what it is. It is an application you load onto your computer (like hulu desktop for example).

      Hulu (the website) is a video streaming website, so it doesn't make sense to compare it to the boxee.tv website.

    21. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try XBMC
      http://xbmc.org/

    22. Re:What exactly is boxee good for??? by idlemachine · · Score: 1

      I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful. Any suggestions?

      I'm a big fan of XBMC, which started out on the original Xbox but is now available for the major platforms.

  11. I've gone back to XBMC. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been a faithful user of Boxee for the past year, but the Beta convinced me to go back to XBMC.

    Problems I had with Boxee:
    1) Didn't expose all features of XBMC, such as Synch Display Refresh Rate to Media. I've got a TV that can do 24hz, 50hz,60hz, etc, why should I see pull down artifacts? I also wanted the Skip Direct to Menu option for DVD playback.
    2) Boxee hasn't fixed problems from the Alpha - I've got some ISO rips which still fail to playback in Boxee. XBMC and VLC have no problems with them. This was a _huge_ WAF issue. She had gone back to pulling the DVDs out of storage to watch them!
    3) The Social Media aspect was pointless. None of my friends were using Boxee, and aren't likely to. It was pure clutter between me and my media. Note: You can't unsubscribe from Avner's feed!
    4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection. I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.
    5) When I upgraded to the Beta, my remote control stopped working. :) The packages overwrote files that I had changed to get everything working.
    6) Their releases are a long time apart.
    7) Even when I submitted a patch for a bug, it didn't make it into the Beta.

    The only thing I seem to be giving up is Hulu support, which if it really annoys me, I can port back into XBMC.

    I wish them luck, the Boxee box announced at CES looks pretty cool, and the $200 price point is pretty compelling. It's just not for me.

    1. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103228&Tpk=acer%20aspire%20revo

      plus a MCE remote kit and XBMC live CD.

      you have a XBMC standalone box that will play 1080p HD AND HDMI out.

      Same pricepoint (well close, $30.00 over when you buy the MCE remote and receiver.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > 4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection. I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.

      I ran the first Linux version I could get my hands on and I never had any trouble like this.

      Admittedly, it had to have scanned something before I could watch it but I don't see that as a terribly unreasonable limitation.

      Boxee does very well with the metadata. I wish MythTV did as well. Although I personally prefer the UI in MythTV.

      However, having easy access to all of the web based content is cool (in boxee).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have a XBMC standalone box that will play 1080p HD AND HDMI out.

      Does anyone do a standalone box that will also play from a local Blu-Ray drive?

      Or is it never gonna happen b/c of all of the DRM crap.

    4. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite actually. The internal hardwares quite different and it very would could show up that the Boxxee box will have faster performance. The Revo you link is the single core version (with hyperthreading) and the cut down 9400 chipset. The model you actually want is a bit more expensive Revo 3610 which I think typically sells for about $350. Looks like its been discontinued however :(

    5. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by trjonescp · · Score: 1

      WAF

      ?

      --
      Only speak when it improves the silence.
    6. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wife approval factor

    7. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I just noticed that Boxee is a sponsor of XBMC. You think they're using the engine ? :-)

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    8. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I use that model, and it's quite fast and plays 1080p beautifully. Unless you are playing UT3 or running heavy math on it (like encoding) it's more than fast enough as a playback device. I have yet to find a file that will not play back perfectly. yes even all the hard test files all playback beautifully on that underpowered box under XBMC

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Wife Acceptance Factor.

      Or maybe it's the other way around: Wife Annoyance Factor (I forget).

      I think it's mainly a MythTV mailing list acronym.

      Basically, stuff that us geeks put up with without a second thought (e.g. just ssh into the box from the other computer and run alsamixer to change the volume - how hard is that?) but would annoy the hell out of a nontechnical user (e.g. one's wife) definitely lowers the WAF.

    10. Re:I've gone back to XBMC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Boxee is a fork of XBMC and they pass changes back up the chain. They just aren't as good at keeping up with the changes that XBMC makes. They also limit the configuration options in their release in order to keep it more usable (I'm guessing).

  12. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This wouldn't work on fedora 12?

    Apparently not.

    I mean, the kernels are Linux - period. So, I'm not getting why the specification of Ubuntu here.

    It takes a lot more than a kernel to install and run a program, which list grows only longer and more complex the more complicated the program is, and they're all different from distro to distro. For one thing, they're only offering a .deb file--there's no RPM. I wouldn't be surprised if dependency hell made it a major hackery job just to get it up and running in Debian, let alone a distro as different as Fedora.

  13. Proxies? by stokessd · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping for better proxy / VPN support. I pay for a web proxy and a VPN to England so I can watch BBC, channel 4, etc from the USA. The previous Boxee didn't handle the connection (with password authentication) well. Frankly it was full of fail. I am on the cusp of dumping cable and little things like a better boxee will get me there.

    Sheldon

  14. Boxee Box by ironicsky · · Score: 1

    The most intriguing part about boxee is the box by d-link... Such an awesome case. I've never used Boxee, but have used XBMC(What Boxee is based on)... I wonder how easy it would be to install XBMC-Live on it :)

    1. Re:Boxee Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Boxee Box is ARM-based. I don't believe XBMC have released an ARM version. So it should be as easy as compiling any other similar program for an ARM system. Easy for some, daunting for others.

  15. Boxee with Revo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been thinking about trying one of the $200 Acer Revo boxes (Atom+ION) with either Boxee or XBMC. Anyone have any opinion on that combo? It would be kinda like the Boxee box, except available now & if you want to repurpose it down the road you have a nice little machine...

    1. Re:Boxee with Revo? by sanjosanjo · · Score: 1

      I'm also looking for a nice little box to run Boxee. I would appreciate any comments on good, pre-built, hardware.

    2. Re:Boxee with Revo? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Revo boxes are cool. The nv9400 means they can decode BD rips in hardware without a sweat.

      Depending on your configuration you might want a beefier box due to how much memory will
      end up allocated to the onboard GPU. What OS you run also might be a factor in terms of
      memory.

      Revos already come with Windows preloaded on them. Something like an Asrock 330 comes bare.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  16. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 1

    There's actually a RPM in the Linux forums(which I moderate) for Fedora 12, and compiling it yourself isn't too complex. You need a lot of the -devel packages, but if you take a look at the RPM's spec, that should give you a good idea of what you need.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  17. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Where did you get the sources? It's not on their download site. Wikipedia said Boxee included propriety code, so I thought you couldn't get it. However, if you can get the source, that's a different story, of course.

  18. Impressive by beauman · · Score: 1

    I just installed it on my Karmic netbook, and I have to say it really rocks!

    1. Re:Impressive by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Isn't Boxee just a 10 foot interface thingy? Why would you install it on a netbook?

      I guess I'm missing something here, never actually tried it myself.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:Impressive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Think of an iPod with a GigE and HDMI ports.

      By day it's your mobile media player. By night it's your media center extender.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  19. Re:Great! Now I can watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God I hate 4chan kids. Get off my lawn.

  20. Hardware requirements? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Assuming I don't need any HD content, what sort of hardware would I need to run Boxee? I have an old P3 I'm currently using to view videos, play music, etc. It works great, but I'd like a more task appropriate UI than XFCE. Is Boxee likely to run OK? I can imagine the database back end might take a bit of power to run smoothly.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Hardware requirements? by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      Check out this site: http://wiki.boxee.tv/System_Requirements Also, as an anecdotal data point, I'm running it under Ubuntu 9.10 on a dual core 2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and an old GeForce 5200. I can play content up to 720p without any issues.

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    2. Re:Hardware requirements? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The GPU is probably going to be the deciding factor. On my myth boxes, Nvidias have always done very well and Intels have been decent. ATI just sucks.

      So something like an AppleTV with a 1.6Ghz GPU and an nv7100 is more than adequate.

      Nvidia seems to get good marks in terms of Windows drivers too.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  21. Obligatory by Tikkun · · Score: 2, Informative

    No Linux Netflix Streaming. Binary Deb Package. Lame.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a link to the source code. Just go through the registration, it's on step 3.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No there isnt, its just a deb file for ubuntu

  22. why the fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you have to register to use this if you don't care about or don't want the "social networking" crap?

  23. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    You're running Fedora. Take charge of the situation.

    Crack the DEB open and take a look at the boxee binary and see what it links to.

    There's a good chance that everything it needs is already installed on your system.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  24. Nothing to do with OpenGL by pavon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reporting on this has been extremely bad. This all has to doing video decoding in hardware. DirectX has APIs for that, and they are now being used in the Windows version. The Linux version continues to use the relevant Xorg extensions (XvMC?) for video decoding.

  25. DirectX on MacOSX and Ubuntu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they mean that DirectX is now available for MacOSX and Ubuntu? I didn't know that.

    Good move since OpenGL didn't provide any acceleration.

    morons...

  26. I gave up on desktop Linux back in 2006. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And I did it because I just didn't have time to dick around with it any longer. I got a Macbook, and finally found a Unix that didn't require constant tinkering.

    1. Re:I gave up on desktop Linux back in 2006. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find that the Mac requires more tinkering.

      Then again, I tend to want to use the data that I have accumulated over my computing life including
      lots of photos, music, and home videos and commercial videos that a Mac might not tolerate very well
      or handle very well.

      YMMV.

      MacOS 10 as a "better Unix" is grossly overrated. ...which brings up a good point:

              How does Boxee do about supporting all of those "obscure" video formats that are "only used by pirates"
      when you're running on MacOS? Does it do all the heavy lifting for you or does it direct you to download a
      bunch of other things by hand as other Mac apps (like Plex) do?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:I gave up on desktop Linux back in 2006. by .tekrox · · Score: 1

      Both Boxee and XBMC use mplayer or ffmpeg for playback - which both in turn use libavcodec - and that supports pretty much anything a 'regular' home user is going to encounter. (also most nerds...)

      FYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libavcodec#Implemented_video_codecs

  27. Downgrade for me by shagrat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm finding I liked the alpha better. One of my biggest gripes is that I can no longer tell boxee that the IMDB movie info its associated one of my files with isn't correct. In the alpha, there was a choice in the info screen of the file to say "Thats not the right info" whereupon I could choose again what movie it really was. Now I can't do that. In fact, I'm not sure what I need to do in that situation, and boxee has mislabled dozens of my files.

    1. Re:Downgrade for me by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      They're working on a fix for that. The issue is to do with negotiating...something (I have no idea what, exactly) with imdb. It's not a technical problem, but a business one. As soon as that's resolved, that feature is coming back.

      In the meantime, I manually renamed the handful of files the beta mislabeled. I just googled "imdb [movie name]" and used the name and release year as the new file name. Fixed them right up. (Admittedly, this was only around 10 files for me, so it wasn't a big deal).

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  28. Outside the US by DaveGod · · Score: 1

    Does this have much value outside of the US? Here in UK our legit internet sources of actual TV and movies is quite limited and I see no sign of support for iPlayer, 4oD or Demand5.

    1. Re:Outside the US by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 1

      The Boxee Alpha supports iPlayer, through a plugin. I'm assuming that it is also available in the Beta. I don't know about the others.

  29. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    And for those who don't know, all you need to 'crack open' a DEB are the standard systems tools, ar and tar. No obscure, opaque binary headers to be stripped off with cryptic, overspecialized tools like rpm2cpio, and no need for bizarre, nearly obsolete tools like cpio. DEB just works, unlike that RPM crap! :)

    (Note, I work with both package formats daily, and have never actually had a problem with either one, but it really does seem like the RPM dev team made some weird-ass decisions back in the day.)

  30. What about virtual machines? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I run XP in a Sun Virtual box. Do you think I will be able to do netflix through that?

    Also I wonder if the netflix engine is going to be any better or worse than using the Silverlight viewer that netflix offers. My main problem with the latter is that it has such shallow buffer that the playback often stops. I'd like to find a viewer with a deep buffer even if I had to wait 15 minutes for the movie to commence playing.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:What about virtual machines? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Netflix? Buffering?

      I haven't had that happen for a long, long time. At all. And someone around my house seems to always be streaming Netflix at all times, using either Silverlight on Windows or the official PS3 viewer.

      I'm sure I'm asking obvious stuff that you've already checked, but: Is your network hosed up somehow uploading/downloading too many torrents, or something similar?

  31. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by bucky0 · · Score: 1

    You don't need to source to figure out what libraries are needed, the RPM's .spec file will give that to you.

    --

    -Bucky
  32. Re:Linux 64 Bit Support Ubutu 9.04 - Crash! by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    It just crashes for me.

    The "Boxee" tries to load itself...takes 20 seconds or so...and then it just vanishes...just like a crashy piece of software that doesn't work...same way.
    Nivida drivers and OpenGL are working, because I run Blender (opengl) on it...and opengl games + wine...

    So for now...beta is indeed beta.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  33. Re:GNU/Ubuntu??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no no no, it's "GNUbuntu"

  34. Boxee is based on XMBC by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Boxee is based on XMBC, so whatever XMBC supports should also be supported by Boxee. I haven't had to download anything yet, but I've just used Boxee as a front-end to my iTunes library, Netflix, YouTube, and Hulu.

  35. Still requires online registration by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Sounds like big brother phoning home. No thanks. "But its a social" - NO. Make a player or a chat client, not both.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  36. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    The gnome archive manager can also open DEB files just like a tarball...

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  37. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by capnkr · · Score: 1

    DEB just works, unlike that RPM crap! :)

    Thanks for the trip down Memory Lane, to back in the days when I used RPM-distro's, and wondered at the smugness of those DEB users with their cryptic 'apt' commands and, what seemed most baffling, no Dependency Hell issues...

    Then one day (OK, one 2-or-3-days, and a lot of floppies, and command line hoodoo, and researching BBS forums to get everything working...) I tried it myself, and, well, they were right - once you go DEB, you never go back. ;)

    Even now, 10+ years later, I still shy away from using RPM-based distro's. :D

    --
    "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
  38. Re:What's so special about Ubuntu “Karmic&am by Jon_S · · Score: 1