Slashdot Mirror


$4,400/Yr. Coders May Work On Dept. of Labor Project

theodp writes "To power the Tools for America's Job Seekers Challenge, the US Department of Labor tapped IdeaScale, a subsidiary of Survey Analytics, which is headquartered in Seattle with satellite offices in Nasik, India and Auckland, NZ (PDF). According to the Federal Register (PDF), an Emergency OMB Review was requested to launch the joint initiative of the DOL, White House, and IdeaScale to help out unemployed US workers. A cached Monster.com ad seeks candidates to work on the development and maintenance of ideascale.com, but in India at an annual salary of Rs. 200,000 to 300,000 ($4,4000 to $6,600 US). BTW, an earlier White House-sponsored, IdeaScale-powered Open Government Brainstorm identified legalizing marijuana as one of the best ways to 'strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness.'" There's no guarantee that Indian workers recruited by that Monster.com ad would work on US Department of Labor projects.

67 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. It's Worse Than You think! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Do you know that the servers the government purchased to run these have memor that's ... made in Taiwan! Where the average annual income for a factory worker is a paltry US$1,150.00 annually! And don't even get me started on where the plastic casings came for the keyboards, servers and mice that comprise these servers!

    I have this weird feeling that had they gone with American services for building these websites at 10x the cost of using IdeaScale, the Slashdot summary would have read about the absurdly high spending that the Department of Labor is wasting our tax dollars on and would have something about a cursory glance finding tons of companies willing to fullfill the work order for 1/10 what they spent. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. They picked the route that most CEOs today are picking and they saved us from more tax dollar expenditures. Pick your poison.

    And don't tell anybody but I think Obama's coffee mugs are ... MADE IN CHINA! Just like yours and mine! The horror!

    BTW, an earlier White House-sponsored, IdeaScale-powered Open Government Brainstorm identified legalizing marijuana as one of the best ways to 'strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness.

    So because IdeaScale built an application to spec for the White House (who shouldn't have paid for it if it didn't meet requirements) and a bunch of pothead hippies turned up in full force to get their message out loud and clear on it, it's IdeaScale's fault? I think you'd be better off blaming the concept of democracy or the buzzword 'crowd-sourcing' as this is just kind of evidence of a technology-based bias of the voices.

    You criticize the White House for doing something we all do then you blame the wonderful effects of democracy on a web application?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by aengblom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thread over in one, good job.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    2. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with most of what you said, but legalizing marijuana is not an idea only supported by "pothead hippies".

      I've never smoked _anything_, nor done any illegal drug in my life and I'm in full support of legalizing marijuana. I believe I'm not the only one out there either.

      Resources - Hemp is an awesome product all around (Paper, fabric, etc).
      Save money - Stop jailing people for negligible amounts of recreational marijuana (read: not for distribution).
      Save more money - Stop most of the ridiculous "war on drugs" and the exorbitant spending and manpower on the marijuana aspect of it.
      Make money - Taxation on marijuana just like cigarettes.

      Those are just a few tangible benefits.

      Only hippies support it indeed.

    3. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Personally I'm in it if only for hemp jeans, those things are freakin indestructible compared to cotton.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right on - awesome post.

      However the official white house coffee is Kona coffee grown and processed in Kona Hawaii. I've had some and it is amazingly good. At least something is still made in America.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    5. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Sebilrazen · · Score: 4, Funny

      If marijuana is ever legalized, I'm going to ensure I invest in any and all snack food company stocks I can.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    6. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by CraftyJack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thread over in one, good job.

      You'd have to be some sort of a Nazi to disagree.

    7. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You criticize the White House for doing something we all do then you blame the wonderful effects of democracy on a web application?

      It's the American Way. Shifting blame is pretty easy.

      Repeat after me. "I think its your fault".

      Now wasn't that fun?

    8. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Jeeeb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do you know that the servers the government purchased to run these have memor that's ... made in Taiwan! Where the average annual income for a factory worker [taipeitimes.com] is a paltry US$1,150.00 annually! And don't even get me started on where the plastic casings came for the keyboards, servers and mice that comprise these servers!

      Given Taiwan's status as almost a developed country $1150 annually seemed like a rather suspicious figure. So I read your linked article. It doesn't give a figure for factory workers but it puts the average worker at NT$36,564 per _month_. Or according to the first currency conversion site that came up on google about USD$1200 per month which is a hell of a lot higher than $1150 annually.

    9. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Save more money - Stop most of the ridiculous "war on drugs" and the exorbitant spending and manpower on the marijuana aspect of it.

      Not just the marijuana aspect. All aspects. Legalization would bring the price down by a hefty percentage, which would make marijuana even more attractive compared to the other choices. Plus, it's often argued that marijuana is a gateway drug... which I actually agree with. But why? It has a reputation as a relatively harmless substance. People are willing to buy it off of just about anyone. So you find a guy, you buy from him a few times, and when he's always delivered decent goods you start to have some faith in his products. You feel like trying something else, you go to the same guy who's been supplying marijuana to you. Now if you legalize that first guy stops being a dealer and instead is a corner deli that won't carry anything illegal. The dealer has lost a major trust building product. Of course this won't completely eliminate drug traffic (IMO, nothing ever will), but it'll make a bigger dent than anything else we could possibly do.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "BTW, an earlier White House-sponsored, IdeaScale-powered Open Government Brainstorm identified legalizing marijuana as one of the best ways to 'strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness."

      "I'm not sure the pot thing was so out-of-line actually."

      I was assuming that it continues along the wasteful spending theme. Why would the government spend money to conclude the phenomenally obvious fact that anyone who isn't either uninformed or a moron has known for decades? (answer: you can't finally argue for doing the correct thing after years of active government disinformation campaigns without a goverment study to show to those same wrongly informed sheeple)

      Of course I may have been giving theodp the benefit of the doubt when he actually does think keeping marijuana illegal helps strengthen our democracy. After all, nothing shouts freedom from the rooftops like Uncle Sam telling you what plants you can and cannot grow and consume ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?" - Bender

    12. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If marijuana is ever legalized, I'm going to ensure I invest in any and all snack food company stocks I can."

      Maybe you were going for funny, but there are a surprising number of people who think that the law is what keeps people from smoking pot, shooting heroin, etc. They really believe that if the government suddenly legalizes heroin there will be a run for the pharmacy. It apparently never occurs to the that they aren't about to do so, and they are not "special" [ at least not in that way ;-) ], or that the people who are likely to do heroin are already doing it, law be damned.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by colesw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone I speak with agrees that pot should be legalised just like in the Netherlands. That way you can keep much better control over it.

      I agree that it should be legalized (pursuit of happiness and all that) but I'm not so sure that I buy the "you can keep much better control over it" line. When I was a kid I had no problems getting my hands on booze or tobacco and both of those products are legal. We always knew which store we could go to that wouldn't card us, which 21+ sibling of a friend would make a straw purchase and whose parents were too lazy to lock up the liquor cabinet.

      I think what most people think with better control (at least what I believe, and I've heard others say) is you don't have to worry so much about what is in it. (ie not laced with something).

    14. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, yes, I criticize the White House for doing what I'm doing.

      It's not my job to keep the country's economy running. Well, it maybe should be, but things aren't running that way. The government, on the other hand, has NO other job than to keep the country healthy and in good shape, economically and otherwise.

      So yes, I expect them to better buy domestic stuff. From cars to coffee to developers. What do you think we'd get to hear if the new "official" government cars are from Kia or Toyota? Or, after all they're supposed to be presentable, how about a nice BMW or Mercedes?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by ibbie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everyone I speak with agrees that pot should be legalised just like in the Netherlands. That way you can keep much better control over it.

      I agree that it should be legalized (pursuit of happiness and all that) but I'm not so sure that I buy the "you can keep much better control over it" line. When I was a kid I had no problems getting my hands on booze or tobacco and both of those products are legal. We always knew which store we could go to that wouldn't card us, which 21+ sibling of a friend would make a straw purchase and whose parents were too lazy to lock up the liquor cabinet.

      So no, I don't buy that legalizing pot would make it harder for the kiddies to get their hands on it. The only thing that will do that is parental involvement but I heard that went out of fashion a long time ago and the current trend is to rely on the TV and internet to raise your kids.....

      Keep in mind that "better control over it" isn't limited to keeping it away from under-age users. It also means the application of agricultural and consumer protection laws that we enjoy in regard to our legal vices.

      --
      The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
    16. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not just the marijuana aspect. All aspects. Legalization would bring the price down by a hefty percentage, which would make marijuana even more attractive compared to the other choices.

      Legalization introduces one other aspect that can turn this around. TAXATION

      Cigarettes and alcohol are taxed in special ways (sin taxes, essentially). Legalized marijuana can also be taxed, heavily if you want. Make it have a 100% tax if you wish. Or more. You can have the price of marijuana stay the same, except that former profits are now going to the government. And anyone selling untaxed goods can be charged with tax evasion (dealers *and* buyers).

      Hell, in this day and age, if there are that many doped up people going around, the government ought to have a nice tidy little revenue stream.

    17. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that the problem here is not just the outsourcing for cheap labor. I think that the problem is out sourcing for cheap labor a project designed to help provide jobs domestically. I hope that you can see that and were just typing all kinds of mad rant to get some karma.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    18. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Enforcing a license violation is a lot cheaper than sticking someone in county jail for a couple of months.

      Ah, and there is the problem. A lot of for-profit jails and prisons will lobby legalization out of existence. Pharmaceuticals selling prescription meds will add their army of lobbyists to the cause.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you have to be rational about the taxation or else a black market will still exist. Granted, most of it will remain in the US but it will still exist.

      Look at smokes and booze. We still have blackmarkets for these things. Mostly pretty small for cigarettes because of ease of access but booze is still a problem and considering the health risks of moonshine it is amazing how many people still buy the stuff just to get around the taxes.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    20. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better than that... kdawson basically refuted the whole point of the article at the end. The article was over before anyone even commented.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    21. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by tomhath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You criticize the White House for doing something we all do then you blame the wonderful effects of democracy on a web application?

      I don't think very many of us are throwing around hundreds of billions in tax dollars trying to reduce unemployment in this country while at the same time outsourcing work that could be done here. But I suspect the problem has more to do with stupidity and lack of oversight than intent. DOL tried to contract with a US company, but that company is quietly trying to hire offshore programmers.

    22. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by mcvos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Despite it being illegal there, pot use per capita in the US is higher than in Netherland, where it's (practically) legal.

    23. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are about 120 of them in the US here is a small list of some of those.

      Colorado
      Bent County Correctional Facility
      Crowley County Correctional Facility
      Kit Carson Correctional Center

      Tennessee
      Hardeman County Correctional Center
      Whiteville Correctional Facility

      Texas
      Crystal City Correctional Center
      Bartlett State Jail

      Heck here is the list that CCA runs
      http://www.correctionscorp.com/facilities/

      Or maybe next time you wonder why the sky is blue or 2 + 2 = 4, use google.

    24. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by tomtomtom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that it should be legalized (pursuit of happiness and all that) but I'm not so sure that I buy the "you can keep much better control over it" line. When I was a kid I had no problems getting my hands on booze or tobacco and both of those products are legal. We always knew which store we could go to that wouldn't card us, which 21+ sibling of a friend would make a straw purchase and whose parents were too lazy to lock up the liquor cabinet.

      There's more than one definition of "better control over it". When was the last time you bought alcohol from the store which turned out to be antifreeze? How common is it for one liquor store owner to shoot the owner of the new liquor store which opened down the street because it encroached on his territory? These are both the sorts of things which used to happen during prohibition, and don't now for alcohol, but do for drugs.

    25. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by bconway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was decriminalized (read: effectively legalized by non-enforcement) in Massachusetts last year. As expected, nothing changed.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    26. Re:It's Worse Than You think! by HereIAmJH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Save more money - Stop most of the ridiculous "war on drugs" and the exorbitant spending and manpower on the marijuana aspect of it.

      While in general I agree with you, I doubt much would be saved by eliminating marijuana from the 'War on Drugs'. The reason is that most of those activities would exist anyway. Border crossings would still be checked for other drugs, or are you saying we should legalize cocaine and heroin too? And if not for drugs, they'd still be searching for explosives.

      Locally, they might be able to reduce some of their activities; such as flying over fields and forests looking for pot plantations, the gain wouldn't be large because they would still be out looking for meth.

      I'd much rather have pot legal than alcohol. The worst collateral damage I've seen from pot is a contact high. OTOH, I have childhood friends who were killed by drunk drivers.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
  2. Increase American employment through outsourcing by caller9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, job one for creating American jobs is farming jobs out to India. Nice.

  3. Don't Worry... by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't worry. I'm sure they'll be billed back to the Dept. of Labor at 100k per year, +20% finder's fee.

  4. 200000 or 300000 in India is very low by middlemen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rs. 200,000 or Rs. 300,000 is a very low salary in India. Junior programmers generally get paid at least Rs.500,000 to Rs.700,000

    1. Re:200000 or 300000 in India is very low by bain_online · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yah but obviously you are missing the difference in living cost.

      Socially acceptable (and considered good) living conditions are achievable with these salaries in India. Minimum wedge in "Federal" US means probably some dingy old apartment and living on free food from Mcdonalds.

      BTW: Can you afford a full time housekeeper on minimum wedge in US?

      --
      BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
  5. When it comes to programming by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You get what you pay for.

    A lot of people tend to think that just because the person is over in India they'll be willing to work for a sub-average wage. Which, given regular circumstances, is generally true. Coding is another thing all together. If you live in a poverish state, you can't be expected to know C++. In fact it might be a stretch to say you know how to operate a computer. Those people who get hired for "Tech Support" aren't guru's by any means (and I think we all knew that). But they have been trained how to handle with customers, the basics of operating a computer, and are given a good list of responses. Programming is not something you can train "on the job". You need previous knowledge on the basics of computers. Then you need to learn a bit of program theory, how it all works. Lastly you need to learn the Syntax of various languages. A lot of people drop out when they can't deal with the Syntax. Some people drop out when they can't get the theory. Some people just don't like computers. You can't hire someone off the street and think that within a short time they'll be able to pick up all of those skills.

    That's not to say there aren't educated programmers that come from developing countries. Every once in a while a hard working family will be able to afford an education, and once they have that education, they usually fly stateside to make more money. They know that with their education they can be making way more money than 4400 USD a year. So they go and tack an extra digit to that paycheck, keep half and the other half is more than enough to either fly the family to the States or support them in India.

    Basically what it boils down to, they're going to get some guy who can talk the talk but not walk the walk. He'll agree to $4400 a year for as long as he can hold the job since he was only make $1000 a year back at his old job. Because anyone who knows what they're doing knows they are worth more.

  6. Fixed that for myself by Taedirk · · Score: 3, Funny

    US Department of Labor

    For some reason, I read this as Department of DAY Labor..

  7. Why So Flamebait, Chums? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's with all the anti-administration flamebait recently? Yesterday, submitted as fact, were a set very dubious allegations that turned out to be false, surprising almost no-one. Today, we're supposed to get upset because an American company that also hires workers in India gets a contract to hire workers in America, and reprise the anger we felt when fratards overwhelmed a lackluster public response to an Obama administration suggestion box with their gormless suggestion to 'save the economy' by legalizing a plant that grows like a weed. What gives?

  8. But, it's the Free Market, right? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, it might be driving down wages and benefits for Americans and allowing other nations to leverage our infrastructure for their profit, but isn't that just one of the perks of being a Friedmannite economy?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  9. Re:Increase American employment through outsourcin by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry. In time, India will outsource its jobs to America.

  10. full-time? really? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have friends in India. I discussed IT salary differences with them. I said "this web page says you can get software engineers for $5k/year in India. Is that for real?"

    I was told that that's bullshit and that Indian professionals actually earn in excess of $20,000 per year. $5k/year would only buy interns with no education and no experience, from what my friends in Bangalore tell me.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:full-time? really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $20,000 in India only buys you slightly older developers with undergraduate degrees, five years experience and about the same quality of work. One enormous (really enormous, like freight train enormous...) American heartland transportation company found that every hour of time worked by an Indian subcontractor required at least 20 minutes of stateside integration and clean-up of the code, as well as correction of wrong logic in the unit tests. With 200 foreign contractors working 8 hours a day, the company needed 66 full-time local IT employees just to keep up with integration.

      When asked by an employee (a former foreign contractor herself who had naturalized) if he was concerned about the quality of the code coming from the contractors in Hyperbad, the CTO of the company gave a short and surprising answer (really short, like the length of a railroad spike, short). He said, "I don't care about the quality of the code. Do you know how much money we're saving?"

      It sounds to me like this company is in for a long ride (really long, like the length of a railroad track, long).

  11. Free movement in goods, no free movement in people by Concern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have a marvellous system called Free Trade. You can tell it's good just from it's name. It promotes Freedom! All the nations of the world are joining together as one to allow free movement in goods across borders.

    Unfortunately, they are all also being very careful to make sure that their citizens don't have the same freedom of movement as a toaster.

    What must it be like, to work all day on an assembly line as a child, producing shoes that have more freedom than you do - they can go to America!!

    We can whine for tariffs, and try to tax and regulate foreign trade. This sucks for the economy - incidentally, protectionist policies are said to have contributed to the Great Depression. Double good luck stopping trade in something like software, which can cross a border without even needing to be smuggled in a gas tank.

    So many factors go into currency and cost of living differences of the kind between the US, and say, India. So, that's not changing any time soon. Unless the dollar crashes. :)

    In fact, the only hope an American laborer really has in the mean time is to open their borders. Allow free movement in people. And hope that people from around the world will want to come to the US to work. While it's cheaper to make things in the 3rd world, no one really wants to live there. It kind of sucks to save money by eliminating working police, courts, fire exits, scholarships, clean streets, environmental regulations, safety rules, torts, and so forth. The current system only soldiers on because, workers just have no choice. If they had one, labor might elect to find a more favorable set of laws to live under, which would somewhat mitigate management's ability to shop for the most cheap-but-labor-unfriendly shit-where-you-sleep laws they can find.

    Hardly anything could be a bigger screw than what we have now, which involves H1B programs that bring foreign skilled labor into the US to learn, get experience, and then forces them to take it back home to India, Asia, etc. But this is probably exactly why IBM, Sun, Microsoft, etc. all support H1B programs.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  12. Re:outsourcing by bain_online · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interestingly thats how british took over india some 200 years ago

    --
    BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
  13. Re:Increase American employment through outsourcin by batquux · · Score: 4, Funny

    In all fairness, America did intercept all the trade Europe was going to attempt with India back in Columbus' day.

  14. 4000/year ? youll only get college kids by unity100 · · Score: 5, Informative

    or script kiddies.

    4000/year is too low for getting even an average quality indian coder. i have to compete with indians in web development, i know how ridiculously low rates they pull sometimes, but these rates generally are placed in projects that can be somehow gobbled up from premade code. i dont think with 400/month you are going to get quality ppl. youll probably get some college kids in a high turnover sweat shop.

  15. Call or e-mail your Congress-Person by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would urge US slashdotters to call or e-mail your Congress-Person. If this is really true, it is a violation of US Federal Contracting standards. Generally, Federal IT contracts specify all workers on the contract to be either US Citizens or Permanent Residents.

  16. Fine, just make it fair by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I have to complete with $5K/year Indian programmers, I have a right to lower my living costs by outsourcing my yard maintenance to an $3/hour undocumented mexican gardener. Or by outsourcing my software purchases to $0/hour piratebay. I know there are good arguments about both of these pursuits, but then there are similar ones about skirting US labor laws by outsourcing. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

  17. The Inconvenient Truth by Concern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, I'm in the US, and it's obviously true. It's just inconveniently true.

    Our anti-pot drug policies eliminate any possibility of salutary tax revenue from an industry that's worth billions even as a black market. In addition to that, we have to catch, try and incarcerate pot growers, sellers, and users at staggering expense (also billions, when all is said and done).

    Pot is basically as harmless as alcohol, but since we force our educators and police to demonize it even while half of them use it themselves, we undercut the entire credibility of our anti-drug programs (which are important for helping kids avoid drugs that are actually dangerous). So not only do we get no tax on billions, but we spend billions, and we contribute to actual drug problems (at what additional cost I hesitate to guess).

    We could still try the tired argument that pot really is dangerous. We have to hope not, since a huge portion of the population admits to using it in studies. The Netherlands notwithstanding, three of our last three presidents have admitted to using various illegal drugs and got elected anyway.

    The open government brainstorming application worked perfectly. It distilled a set of great ideas directly from citizen activists with less lobbying, filtering and political BS.

    Legalizing pot would be a great idea. It would cut waste, generate revenue, empty prisons, improve the health and safety of the nation's youth. It's too bad Obama absolutely cannot and will not do it. It would be political suicide. And that gets us into analyzing the particular hues that the fascinating kaleidoscope of American politics puts over reality...

    Either way, you can't blame the app, or the app's developer for doing an unusually good job, just because the truth is embarrassing for the "national psyche."

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:The Inconvenient Truth by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Our pro-theocracy religionists disapprove of any distraction from suffering for Jesus.
      Any pleasure must be rationed by the religionists (sex) or eliminated (pleasurable chemicals) because they are levers of social control and damn (pun intended) the consequences.

      The War on Some Drugs is a pure product of US religionist (p)uritanism.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:The Inconvenient Truth by Concern · · Score: 4, Informative

      People always lump in users with sellers that are "thrown in jail" and I just don't believe it. I haven't heard of a person in the US going to Jail for just having a small amount of pot or smoking a joint. Unless you are a dealer, the cops and the feds don't even bother.

      First google result:

      "BJS officials also estimated that 42% of state "marijuana only" prisoners and 23% of federal "marijuana only" prisoners were incarcerated for possession, not "trafficking."[7] ("Trafficking" includes "possession with intent to distribute.") Applied to the previously calculated estimates, as adjusted for the June 1998 prisoner counts, there would be 7,400 state prisoners and 2,300 federal prisoners incarcerated for marijuana possession only, for a total of 9,700 prisoners."

      BJS is "Bureau of Justice Statistics." I found this at the first link in a Google search, something I presume you are capable of doing yourself.

      I'll skip the rest... unless you'd rather we go on?

      Try harder next time.

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  18. You are off by a factor of 12 by dreadlord76 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article you quoted states:

    >The average worker in Taiwan earns a monthly salary of NT$36,564, a slight increase from the same >period two years ago, a recent survey released by the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) showed.

    That's $1142 USD a Month, not annually. That's comparable to the US minimum wage, but in a country you can have lunch for 1-2$ US. Compared with cost of living, it's not really a bad deal.

    Oh, and for folks working at Foxconn or Taiwan Semiconductor, their annual bonus this year is expected to be 6 month of salary. Any US tech companies giving out 6 months of bonus this year?

  19. Am I reading this right? by dwiget001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The U.S. Government is essentially paying non-U.S. citizens to maintain a web-site for Americans seeking employment?

    Sorry, but my Irony Meter (TM) just pegged and is now completely non-functional.

  20. Not already? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>It's just a matter of time until the United States Department of Defense gets outsourced

    You mean like Blackwater?

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    1. Re:Not already? by andphi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blackwater was contracted to the State Department, not the DoD.

    2. Re:Not already? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to be confused with the entirely different XE.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  21. The whole article is a confusing non sequitur... by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good god, that’s hard to follow. There are so many links I can’t tell which one is the main article, there are acronyms that I don’t recognise, and it’s not tied together at all. The flow of information just jumps from one thing to another with little apparent connection between them. It’s also incorrect.

    Let me see if I’m understanding this, and make it easier to follow...

    To power the Tools for America's Job Seekers Challenge, the US Department of Labor tapped IdeaScale, a subsidiary of Survey Analytics, which is headquartered in Seattle with satellite offices in Nasik, India and Auckland, NZ.

    According to the Federal Register (PDF), an OMB (Office of Management and Budget) Emergency Review was requested to launch the “Jobs for America’s Job Seekers Challenge”, a joint initiative by the DOL, White House, and IdeaScale to help out unemployed US workers.

    Now we hit the first non sequitur... how is the development and maintenance of ideascale.com related to the Jobs for America’s Job Seekers Challenge?

    A Monster.com ad (cached) seeks candidates to work on the development and maintenance of ideascale.com — in India at an annual salary of Rs. 200,000 to 300,000 ($4,4000 to $6,600 US).

    The connection is – apparently – that the same people developing and maintaining the IdeaScale website will presumably also be designing the platform to “allow toolmakers and developers to present their free online job tools to workforce development experts and jobseekers for discussion, rating, and voting”. That’s a bit of a stretch, but okay. (As kdawson correctly pointed out, “There’s no guarantee that Indian workers recruited by that Monster.com ad would work on US Department of Labor projects.” Wait a second... did kdawson actually get something right? At any rate that still doesn’t make up for posting this atrocity to begin with.)

    Now we hit the second non sequitur... what does IdeaScale’s other contest/survey have to do with this one, other than being hosted by the same company? Does the results of a previous survey on how to “strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness” have anything to do with this contest? They have no control over the results of the project: they’re just designing the system to take submissions and allow people to vote on them...

    Last May, in a similar White House-sponsored, IdeaScale-powered Open Government Brainstorm to “strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness”, legalizing marijuana was one of the highest-voted ideas.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  22. Alternatives by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obama hires Indian code-slaves to make a website to help people find jobs.
    McBushcain would have given Haliburton $200 billion to maybe hire some more people, if they wanted to.
    Ron Paul would have left unemployment for the market to solve and hit the snooze button on his alarm.

    --
    For great justice.
  23. Re:Giant Deficits... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    decrease government spending in the first place.

    Bingo! That's exactly what this initiative represents... Outsourcing to reduce government spending. In most government projects, salaries & benefits make up the largest percentage of the 'spending' - So if you want to reduce spending you cut labour costs.

  24. What was the OP smoking? by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this a story about outsourcing or pot legalization?

    Should the respective sides haul out their canned pro/anti stands for one issue, the other, or both?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  25. Frozen dinner by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's comparable to the US minimum wage, but in a country you can have lunch for 1-2$ US.

    Here in the States, a fairly nutritious frozen dinner costs 1 to 2 USD at Walmart*.

    Oh, and for folks working at Foxconn

    But is there an NBCconn of opposite political persuasion to "fair and balance" them out?

  26. hemp != marijuana by Comboman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Resources - Hemp is an awesome product all around (Paper, fabric, etc).

    Hemp is a great product, but although it is related to marijuana, it is not a drug and doesn't help your argument. Other than the US, most countries allow hemp to be cultivated, processed and sold; even countries where marijuana is illegal.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  27. Good job? But he's wrong! by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, but he's wrong! From his own link, the Taiwanese workers are earning about USD1150 per MONTH (which is actually not bad in the 3rd world country I'm in[1]).

    The _FIRST_ sentence says it: "The average worker in Taiwan earns a monthly salary of NT$36,564".

    Google says 36564 Taiwanese dollars is about USD1150 : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&num=100&q=36564+TWD+in+usd&btnG=Search&meta=

    If the average US person can't figure out the difference between years and months, or have poor reading comprehension, or can't be bothered to check stuff properly, it's no surprise US bosses are outsourcing to other countries.

    So what if those 3rd world workers are crap. No point paying far more for just as crap (or worse).

    And guess what, many of these "3rd world" workers aren't that crap.

    See: http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=185

    I've shown some kids these videos and told them that that's the sort of competition they'll be facing (more so as countries like Vietnam start getting into it as well).

    [1] FWIW, I'm a cheap worker (relative to the USA) in a 3rd world country. But hey at least I can read, spell and do basic math (with help from Google :) ). I can even write some simple perl and python code...

    --
    1. Re:Good job? But he's wrong! by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm in a 3rd world country and the top bosses in my ex-company outsourced some work to India.

      A number of those guys were paid more or about the same as us, but most of them weren't very good at what we required them to do. They might have been much better at "VB/Java business apps".

      Our experience with them was they'd say "Yes" but too often it won't be true. Honesty is important when you are trying to get technical things done (diplomacy is important when you are trying to get political things done ;) ).

      FWIW their ex-chairman is now in prison for massive fraud.

      --
    2. Re:Good job? But he's wrong! by Necrobruiser · · Score: 2, Funny

      USD1150/month is not equal to USD1150/year? Next thing, you'll be trying to tell me that 0.02 dollars and 0.02 cents are different!

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    3. Re:Good job? But he's wrong! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear this is cultural - in india, you never say no to a request from a superior. Instead, you kiss ass, then rush to do what you can. Yes, it does hamper communication.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Good job? But he's wrong! by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, but he's wrong!

      I am and I apologize for my haste in looking for an annual income and reporting a monthly income. I had no ill intentions of misrepresentation or denouncing the Taiwanese people. I get five free minutes here and there in my day and just wanted to point out that the memory in all our computers probably come from workers earning less than our minimum wage. That has nothing to do with the rest of my argument.

      If the average US person can't figure out the difference between years and months, or have poor reading comprehension, or can't be bothered to check stuff properly, it's no surprise US bosses are outsourcing to other countries.

      Please do not attribute my own ignorance to the entire populace of the United States of America.

      You've made your point, an ad hominem attack. Fine. But please I do not represent the average American in my posts! They are quick and disposable and if you read my signature, they may even cause death!

      I'm saddened that instead of addressing the rest of my argument you began inferring that I meant '3rd world' (a phrase I didn't use) equated to crap. I'm also saddened that you think what you are seeing in that video is quality when it is the horrible product of over worked and underpaid individuals losing a childhood to low wage slavery and never being given a chance at a university like I was fortunate enough to have. So many wasted minds.

      [1] FWIW, I'm a cheap worker (relative to the USA) in a 3rd world country. But hey at least I can read, spell and do basic math (with help from Google :) ).

      How quick we are to denounce the American superiority only to replace it with our own. Let me know when you're ready to stop trying to take me off my imaginary pedestal and ready to step off of yours. We'll have a nice long chat over a few beers then.

      If you thought I meant anything negative about the work in other countries, I did not. In fact, I am saddened they don't make more for their work and hope one day they make as much as I do for equivalent work. I am saddened that we think this 'outsourcing' is a negative thing when it is actually a great equalizer and makes the "fat lazy ill equipped American (me)" work harder and produce better software.

      --
      My work here is dung.
  28. So, what you going to do? by stonewolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I happen to be one of those people who hates to be in debt as a result I own my home. My property taxes on my house are more than $4,400/year. I know, I just wrote the checks for my taxes last year. Rent for a small apartment within 20 miles of here is about twice what I pay in taxes. Even at the $15,000 mentioned as the startingr salary for coders in India I can't pay my taxes, pay for water, gas, and electricity, still be able to eat. I could live here, pay my taxes, and eat if I steal wood and cook over a fire in my back yard. There is no public transport so I would have to walk everywhere until I was able to get a peddle cart. The nearest grocery store is three miles away and other stores are 5 or more miles away. There is a hospital only half a mile away :-)

    What I am trying to say is that where I live in central Texas our entire society is designed around the assumption that you own a car and can pay $600++/month for housing. Just to live you need about $30,000/year. Which is about twice what a full time worker makes at minimum wage. That $30,000 doesn't get you much of a life. Central Texas is not expensive compared to a lot of place in the US.

    How do we make US workers competitive in a world where there are billions of people who can live on so much less? Seriously, do you have any suggestions? Can we stop bitching dlbout the problem and start solving it? In the past Americans have been pretty good about banding together and solving problems. Where is the spirit that created credit unions as an alternative to corrupt and failed banks? Where the is the spirit that create the labor unions that gave us the standard of living we currently have? Where is the will to just say "NO MORE" and forced a corrupt racist government to end Jim Crowe. (OK, that is still ending, but from my point of view we have come a looooooooong way in the right direction.)

    OK, before someone points it out... yes, I guilty of not doing anything too. At least I'm asklng the question.

    Stonewolf

    P.S.

    I don't know how true this is but I'm hearing that families in Mexico have started sending money to their relatives in the US to help them survive the recession.

  29. Yep, but what about the PE? by stonewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are right. But, I think you missed a major point about the overall lack of professionalism among programmers.

    I have an MSCS and have worked as a software engineer. My wife has a BSME. To graduate she had to pass the EIT. If she didn't pass the test she couldn't graduate. No matter that she earned honors at graduation. No EIT no degree. Ten years later she took and passed the Professional Engineer exam. She has a little stamp that lets her give the legal ability to approval designs. She is legally liable for what she approves. I didn't have to pass any kind of professional exam to get the job title "engineer". I have no little stamp. I can not approve designs.

    What does tht mean? I can write software that is used to design a dam. Any programmer no mater what their training and experience could have been hired to write that software. Lets say my software as a bug that causes it to give wrong answers for very large dams (used float when I should have used long double...) OTOH, only a PE can legally design a dam. If my wife uses my software and the dam bursts she is legally responsible, but I am not. Why is that?

    I used to work for a Canadian PE. He had this little steel ring. The steel was from a bridge that fell down. Canadian engineers are all given (and I believe they are required to wear) a ring made from the steel of that fallen bridge so that their responsibility is always in their minds. There are many examples of people dying from software bugs. The failure of the patriot missiles during the first gulf war and the hundred+ dead soldier that resulted from and idiot not knowing that there is no such thing as 0.1 (one tenth) in binary. Why aren't programmer required to carry around a bit of the combat boot taken from one of those dead soldiers? Or, at least a vial of sand from where they died?

    There are no professional standards for programmers or so called software engineers. There is no code of conduct or ethics for programmers. From the point of view of real engineers we are just a bunch of amateurs being allowed to play with dangerous toys.

    Stonewolf
     

  30. Wrong problem. by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do we make US workers competitive in a world where there are billions of people who can live on so much less? Seriously, do you have any suggestions? Can we stop bitching dlbout [sic] the problem and start solving it?

    I think you are looking at the wrong problem. The problem is our standard of living. We want to have more leisure time and/or more control of our working conditions. We need better health-care and education and secure place to live without working to death in order to earn it.

    We DON't need to be competing with foreign workers. You mentioned Jim Crow. It's a racist jingoism that has convinced Americans that they deserve to profit off of the wages of those in the developing world. We can have a better standard of living when we realize that the Indian programmer has the same interests that we do, and that the Indian's boss and our boss have more in common with each other than with us.

    You mentioned the high cost of taxes and of commuting. We need to start living in cities again. Suburban sprawl has cost us both in commuting costs and by atomizing us and keeping us from having a real community. It's simply more efficient to live near more people. With a real community, we wouldn't need the state to provide services. With real community, we wouldn't be duped into funding the terror war and the drug war. The suburbs tend to be the more reactionary conservative parts of the nation, while the urban areas are the more progressive.

    You mentioned the labor movement. Real democratic radical unions are the only way workers can gain more power. Imagine if both you and the workers in the developing world were in the same union. International solidarity could prevent corporations from constantly moving production to whichever nation has the worst labor and human rights records. We need democratic accountable unions. Not the AFL/CIO or SEIU or the Teamsters. We need unions like the UE and the IWW.

    The ultimate goal should be workers self management of all industry. Wall Street speculators and bosses are in it to make money for themselves in the short term, while workers interests are in creating sustainable jobs with good wages, benefits, and working conditions.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  31. Re:Sigh and you think it solves all problems by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    how do you know? I think a lot of people might be more willing to try it if they see it sold at the local 7-11, which will result in more addicts.

    Instead of talking hypotheticals, why don't we talk real world examples?

    Drug Decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for Creating Fair and Successful Drug Policies

    On July 1, 2001, a nationwide law in Portugal took effect that decriminalized all drugs, including cocaine and heroin. Under the new legal framework, all drugs were "decriminalized," not "legalized." Thus, drug possession for personal use and drug usage itself are still legally prohibited, but violations of those prohibitions are deemed to be exclusively administrative violations and are removed completely from the criminal realm. Drug trafficking continues to be prosecuted as a criminal offense. ...

    More significantly, none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents — from rampant increases in drug usage among the young to the transformation of Lisbon into a haven for "drug tourists" — has occurred.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: