Slashdot Mirror


Russian Whistleblower Cop Arrested

Remember the Russian cop's YouTube narrative on police corruption? Reader Max_W writes with the news that Alexei Dymovsky, the cop whose videos started a movement, was arrested (Google translation; Russian original) on January 22, 2010. He is in prison in the south of Russia. Max_W adds: "It seems only a president is allowed to have a video blog in Russia."

199 comments

  1. Not final by sopssa · · Score: 1

    According to Alexei in the indictment were not listed his specific criminal acts, but simply stated that he committed fraud. They say investigators have not found everything, because detailed charges will be filed Dymov later. In addition, it is not against the CCP [], was handed a resolution to bring an accused on the pretext that it is "secret" character.

    So he is being held until final charges are issued? Sounds like something that would happen in every country.

    1. Re:Not final by sopssa · · Score: 1

      To add to this, you need to pay big sums of money so you could bail out in US.

    2. Re:Not final by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Informative

      USA has a law where citizens can only be detained for 24 hours without charges.

      This can be useful in detaining people highly suspect of a crime, or in TV shows in increasing drama.

    3. Re:Not final by turgid · · Score: 4, Informative

      The UK has a law where citizens (usually brown ones with beards) can be detained for a month and a half without charge, usually in HMP Belmarsh.

    4. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give him a ham radio and send him to Haiti. He'll be safe over there, and he'll be able to communicate with friends and family worldwide.

      "Say, Alexei, what's that noise in the background? Are you cooking stovetop popcorn? Alexei, are yo&*^(*&%($#^%$#&^%$? [NO CARRIER]

    5. Re:Not final by sopssa · · Score: 1

      He is being charged. Actually it looks to be exactly the same case, just that it's 10 days instead of 24 hours.

      The need to charge Dymov due to the fact that, for him, was elected as a preventive measure under house arrest, and prosecution must be charged within 10 days from the date of the application of preventive measures.

    6. Re:Not final by MarkvW · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bullshit. Mod parent way down. Parent is full of it.

      The US Constitution permits people to be held on a probable cause determination made by a policeman for up to 48 (forty-eight) hours. After 48 hours there must be judicial review of probable cause or the defendant must be released from custody. That's the Riverside case.

      A related provision requires the detained person to be charged within 72 hours of probable cause detention or released. That's the Gerstein case.

      The U.S. Constitution sets a minimum standard. States can set standards that are MORE protective of individual rights than the U.S. Constitution, but they cannot go below the constitutional standard.

    7. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if that pesky little law is inconvenient, you label them an "enemy combatant" and it no longer applies! Great huh?

    8. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless of course you're called a Terrorist. Then it's off to Gitmo with your ass, regardless of any facts or lack thereof!

    9. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US Constitution doesn't say anything about an absolute minimum time before being charged. Feel free to look it up, it is not in there. Court cases and Congress have determined the minimum time, but all the US Constitution has to say is that you have the right to a speedy trial (6th Amendment), that Congress can't suspend habeas corpus except during a rebellion (Art I, Sect 9), and that your rights can't be suspended without due process (14th Amendment). How long a person can be detained before being charged depends entirely on how these provisions are interpreted.

    10. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/01/23/2799553.htm

      Two unnamed US officials say 47 Guantanamo Bay detainees will be held in prison indefinitely, without charge.

      They are reportedly too dangerous to be released, but cannot be tried either because the evidence against them is too flimsy or was extracted by coercion.

      The outcome will dismay civil liberties groups who hoped US President Barack Obama would end the practice of detention without trial.

      "The reality is that although they're talking about holding these 47 prisoners without charge or trial, the sad reality is they've been held for eight years without charge or trial," he said.

      "So it's not as if they're going to be entering into any new arena, there's no new discussion or dialogue. The whole talk about the change has come to America was simply a lie."

      The Presidential taskforce has recommended 35 of the 196 detainees left at Guantanamo Bay face prosecution.

    11. Re:Not final by skine · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sorry, meant underrated and hit overrated.

      Please mod me down.

    12. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are misinformed. He would be released without paying a penny in the US. In fact they would not arrest him until they were ready to arraign him since he is a police officer, and then he would be released on his own recognizance. Watch a few episodes of Law and Order some time. While it isn't wholly accurate, this part is certainly accurate.

      In Springfield MA police officers who had been videotaped kicking a guy in the head were found not guilty. The judge ruled that they used "reasonable force" to subdue the subject.

      So you are quite wrong on so many levels. This would definately not happen in the USA. Indeed, as I pointed out, we basically have the opposite problem here, where if you are a cop you can often quite literally get away with murder.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Not final by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Really? Can you cite this US law? I would like to know. Because in some states they routinely hold people for 48 hours without charging them.

      "If the police make an arrest, the suspect must be either released or charged with an offense and brought before a judge within 48 hours." (6th paragraph down)

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    14. Re:Not final by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you haven't seen it already, watch this video.

      The Largest Street Gang In America

      I came from Portland, OR, which is sadly featured repeatedly in this short movie. I really wish someone could do some sort of satellite hack and force the entire country to watch this video, just once in their lifetime.

      People really need to open their eyes and reevaluate what level of force police should be allowed to use against non-compliant persons. The most tragic cases highlighted in that video are those where police were engaging citizens who had broke no law.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    15. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it looks to be exactly the same case, just that it's 10 days instead of 24 hours.

      So... it's exactly the same, but different.

    16. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems in Russia, cops are involved in murder-for-hire too,

      http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1022756/russian-police-kill-online
      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/world/europe/06chechnya.html?_r=1
      http://cpj.org/2007/01/chechnya-police-may-be-behind-politkovskaya-murder.php

      etc. etc. etc. etc. Google search for "Russia police murder" seems to yield as many cases of murder investigations as number of times police murdering people.

      As to the "kicking a guy in the head", it depends who the person arrested is and what he is doing. Hell, if you read enough of this shit you'd come to conclusion that the guy is lucky that he is alive.

      What needs to end is this shit with cops protecting cops. It is total bullshit and corruption. Police is here to SERVE AND PROTECT, and that does not mean themselves. If serve and protect, they are heros. As soon as they turn a blind eye to their college or "friend" doing something illegal, or worse, covering up, they are traitors to the very oath they took to SERVER AND PROTECT.

      I must say vast majority of the police force in US and Canada and other western nations are the heros. But the hooligans are ruining it for them, their image and the rest of us. And I do not mean the ones from without.

      The youtube cop is A HERO! A Russian HERO. Russians need to rally around this guy and not let his voice fall on deaf ears. The world needs more of these heros to change the cesspool that exists in places.

    17. Re:Not final by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ability for a suspect to be released from jail depends on quite a lot of socioeconomic factors such as race, location and their ability to obtain legal representation. In most states, if you have a lawyer, you can obtain Release on own Recognizance pretty quickly if they don't plan on filing charges right away. This depends a lot on what you're suspected of doing.

      As for holding people without charging them... terrorism laws have changed a lot of the governments power in this respect. Beyond even the 4th amendment and 5th amendment, the US government has shown a willingness to ignore the constitution and even international law altogether if they feel national security interests are at stake. The somewhat recent case of an extraordinary rendition of a Canadian citizen while on US soil to Syria poses significant opposition to commonly held beliefs about constitutional protection. After being tortured and returned to Canada, in 2007 he came back to the US to testify before congress about his experience and as far as I know, nothing has ever come of that hearing.

      The Alien Terrorist Removal Provisions of the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 allows for the FISA court to deport an alien suspected of terrorism based solely on classified evidence, to which the target cannot try to suppress evidence or intervene in any way including having representation at any hearings. Whether they are deported or not, they receive very little(if any) information about the proceedings or how any decision was reached. Oddly enough, after reading the entire bill, I could not find any reference anywhere describing where the persons can be deported to. In essence, our government formally legalized extraordinary rendition 15 years ago, although I doubt in many cases of extraordinary rendition that they follow the appropriate steps(however rudimentary they may be) through the FISA court. All they have to do is call it a deportation instead of rendition. And since the target cannot intervene in any proceedings of the process, they cannot suppress any evidence gathered via illegal means.

      If anyone was hoping for "change", you didn't get it the way you thought you would. The Alien Terrorist Removal Provisions of this bill were sponsored by your very own Joe Biden. Clinton formulated the bill but it wasn't until the Oklahoma bombing that the political will to pass it existed.

      So if you're a foreigner, in the US on a Visa, you can be held indefinitely or extradited to Syria or any other country willing to torture you on our behalf.

      Either you're with us or you're against us. You have nothing to hide, right comrade?

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    18. Re:Not final by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I know there's probably no point in talking to someone who thinks that "Republic Broadcasting Network" is a good source of news, but I gotta ask ... was there some point to that video?

    19. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mostly, that if your SlashID is c6gunner or something similar you are probably part of the problem and don't think that there is one ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    20. Re:Not final by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Cute :) Seriously, though, you're not actually going to try and defend that crap, are you? Those "filmmakers" make Michael Moore look like a paragon of truth and honesty.

      Oh, and btw, my "SlashID" is that bunch of numbers beside my username.

    21. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and btw, my "SlashID" is that bunch of numbers beside my username."

      Actually, Slashdot calls it a Nickname not a username (see the login page). The number next to it is your UID. Only a fascist would think that a number is a suitable way to ID someone ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    22. Re:Not final by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Cute :) Seriously, though, you're not actually going to try and defend that crap, are you? Those "filmmakers" make Michael Moore look like a paragon of truth and honesty.

      Oh, and btw, my "SlashID" is that bunch of numbers beside my username.

      Have you been drinking today?

    23. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unless of course you're called a Terrorist. Then it's off to Gitmo with your ass, regardless of any facts or lack thereof!

      Wrong. It's called "enemy combatant". The patriot act was never *that* specific about those to whom it apply, else most people might not have cared so much about its unconstitutionality.

    24. Re:Not final by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Actually, Slashdot calls it a Nickname not a username

      Subscriptions:

      Otherwise put your real name, username or anything else you deem appropriate. If you leave this field blank the message will default to containing your Slashdot username.

      Feeds:

      Where you see $username below, substitute the URI-encoded username of the user in question (such as Clifton+Wood).

      Only a fascist would think that a number is a suitable way to ID someone ;-)

      There's no place like 127.0.0.1

    25. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      OK. I'm done trying to get you to get a clue. Just go to the Login page to see what it is called. I accept your apology ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    26. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange how enemy combatants are getting treated better than citizen prisoners.

    27. Re:Not final by horza · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you fail to reveal a password to storage that may or may not contain information (except the government may decide to believe there is some) then you can go to jail for a very long time even without any charge.

      Phillip.

    28. Re:Not final by Ummite · · Score: 1

      In case USA need to detain someone more than 72 hours, they send them in Guantanamo and this hack allow them to respect the rules of the constitution.

    29. Re:Not final by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      If I had time to hightail it to the country, I'd like to see all police stop work for a week just to show idiots like you who the "real" criminals are. You would be crying for the police to come back within a day.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    30. Re:Not final by Pence128 · · Score: 1

      yes, because water-boarding is actually a type of spa treatment.

      --
      404: sig not found.
    31. Re:Not final by Mitreya · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In Springfield MA police officers who had been videotaped kicking a guy in the head were found not guilty. The judge ruled that they used "reasonable force" to subdue the subject. So you are quite wrong on so many levels. This would definately not happen in the USA. Indeed, as I pointed out, we basically have the opposite problem here, where if you are a cop you can often quite literally get away with murder.

      I bet if those Sprinfield MA police officers were videotaped accusing their superiors of corruption they would not get off so easily. Nor is he being persecuted for abuse of his power against common people.

      Oddly enough, anytime you piss off your superior, you are likely to suffer for it -- police officer or not, America or Russia.

    32. Re:Not final by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      So the police are a big gang protecting us from several other gangs (rather ineffectively at that). And because we can't stand up on our own, we have to bend over double for the police gang?

      Nice. That sort of logic actually glorifies sending PEOPLE to prison to get raped.

    33. Re:Not final by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Obama's changed all that. Since the saviour came into power and rescued us from the evil republicans Gitmo has been destroyed. Right?

    34. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Mod parent way down. Parent is full of it.

      The US Constitution permits people to be held on a probable cause determination made by a policeman for up to 48 (forty-eight) hours. After 48 hours there must be judicial review of probable cause or the defendant must be released from custody. That's the Riverside case.

      A related provision requires the detained person to be charged within 72 hours of probable cause detention or released. That's the Gerstein case.

      The U.S. Constitution sets a minimum standard. States can set standards that are MORE protective of individual rights than the U.S. Constitution, but they cannot go below the constitutional standard.

      He said UK not US. As in United Kingdom. England. Dude. Different country, different laws.

    35. Re:Not final by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      In Springfield MA police officers who had been videotaped kicking a guy in the head were found not guilty. The judge ruled that they used "reasonable force" to subdue the subject.

      Link please?

    36. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 48 hours normally, but, if courts are closed, it can be longer. Don't get arrested on a Friday night of a long weekend. Fun story:

      Was once a witness to a drunk driver deciding to show off how awesome he was at driving while wasted. He decided to take his mustang, pull a donut in the intersection so as to 180 it, and then buzz by a pedestrian that he was mouthing off to.

      Thankfully he never got to the point of buzzing by the pedestrian (he'd have hit her, probably). Instead he crashed at the intersection into a wooden planter after jumping the curb.

      So, mistake #1: DUI. Mistake #2: Hitting something while DUI.

      Those are bad, but it's Massachusetts, so at that point, you wouldn't get any jail time. Maybe a few days, tops, on a first offense. However... shortly after the crash, the driver and his passenger decided to flee the scene of the accident. My buddies and I dialed up 911 and ran/drove after them, and pointed them out to the cops.

      That brings us to: mistake #3: Fleeing the scene of a motor vehicle accident. Mistake #4: Getting caught.

      So the cops round the two idiots up and arrest them for DUI, fleeing scene, destruction of property, and other stuff. They come to talk to us to get statements, and one of them mentions off hand that the local lockup is broken, so they'll be taking the suspects to the state pen. They then mention that they won't be able to get them in front of a bail hearing as the guy who handles that has gone home for the long weekend, as it's 11pm friday night. So, these two get to spend the long weekend in state prison, and will be processed on tuesday.

      Fun! And now they can't donate blood.

    37. Re:Not final by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'll let the stupidity of your reply stand on its own.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    38. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm glad to oblige!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    39. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "If I had time to hightail it to the country, I'd like to see all police stop work for a week just to show idiots like you who the "real" criminals are. You would be crying for the police to come back within a day.

      Well your SlashID scares the hell out of me, but luckily for us you are too busy hightailing it to Missouri from Canada because you are afraid of the cold. The very thought of how dangerous you must be has me shivering in the boots I would kick your head in with if you actually had the stupidity to come to my neighborhood and say something stupid like that. Any pansy ass loser can make a threat on Slashdot though, as you have shown.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    40. Re:Not final by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The place where they are detained is apparently known internally as "The Paradise Wing"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    41. Re:Not final by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      What threat? You are the one making threats. I never said anything about kicking anyone's head in. So you have defined yourself as a pansy ass loser. Good on you. I hope you are taking your medication. I said I would hightail it to the country because I know that if the police stopped working, the real criminals would take over and it wouldn't be safe in the cities. I think it was pretty easy to figure that out without explanation... try taking a critical reading course. It sounds like you find the thought of having to defend yourself instead of relying on police threatening. Is this what prompted your violent outburst. I get it, you are by nature unstable and violent, and that is why you don't like police. You probably don't like laws in general, and would rather have free reign to do do what you want. By the way, I live in Canada again. I don't own a gun even though I did my time in the Canadian army. Have you spent any time contributing in any way to your country? Post your neighborhood.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    42. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I think it was pretty easy to figure that out without explanation... try taking a critical reading course. "

      It would probably make more sense for you to go back and get your High School Equivalency Diploma. I concede that I misinterpreted what you wrote. I infered that since you would somehow have to go somewhere to show digitalunity who the "real" (sic) criminals are that you were going to go to where he was and show him. It hadn't occured to me that, by your own admission now, you live in an entirely different country and would not have to go anywhere, but aren't smart enough to figure that out.

      "It sounds like you find the thought of having to defend yourself instead of relying on police threatening."

      OK. Now you need the critical reading course. I find the thought - and actual experience - of having to defend myself against criminal police threatening. I wouldn't mind as much, but the pansies always have backup, and then lie in the police report and on the stand. With "protection" like that I don't need protection, except of course from them.

      "Have you spent any time contributing in any way to your country?"

      I generally try to avoid aiding and abetting criminals.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    43. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I really, really detest people who follow up an insult with a smiley.

    44. Re:Not final by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Well it is a good thing we know who you are then, so we can keep that in mind! ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    45. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is definitely the stupidest argument I've seen on Slashdot in at least a year, and that's saying something.

    46. Re:Not final by ngworekara · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we need a more liberal president.
      I agree.
      Just think of how much worse it could have gotten under mccain/palin
      *shudder*

    47. Re:Not final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he'd "like to see" all the police stop work. That sounds fairly passive to me. In any case, might I suggest you both attempt to acquire something more closely resembling a life?

    48. Re:Not final by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. I'm not sure what the exact name of the charge is - news reports of the only conviction I've heard of say "charged with ... offences under section 53 of RIPA" - but it would be something like "Failing to comply with a notice requiring disclosure of encrypted information".

    49. Re:Not final by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Just think of how much worse it could have gotten under mccain/palin

      That's the standard? "Better then the really awful person X"? Wow. No wonder Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize

    50. Re:Not final by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      "There's no place like 127.0.0.1"
      You've got to repeat that three times and tap the heels of the Ruby Slippers together.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    51. Re:Not final by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Only a fascist would think that a number is a suitable way to ID someone ;-)

      That or a Compuserve user.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    52. Re:Not final by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      They are reportedly too dangerous to be released, but cannot be tried either because the evidence against them is too flimsy or was extracted by coercion.

      "They could explode the moment they set foot outside" a source which wished to remained anonymous confided. "We have to keep them constantly doused in liquid nitrogen for safety reasons. They do have cable TV though, we are not monsters."

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    53. Re:Not final by webweave · · Score: 1

      Thank you for posting this link. The Largest Street Gang In America I've heard a few of these stories but they all seem to just go away and I now know why, there was even a large one in my city. I'm going to modify an old saying for a new age. It goes something like this "If you go into a restaurant once and get bad service its the servers fault, if it happens again its the managements fault." I believe people, for the most part do what they are told or at least do what's expected of them. This abuse of police power happens too much to be a cop problem, its management!

    54. Re:Not final by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      IMO, it's a large combination of factors. Police misconduct during the 90's lead to a lot of people taking an us-vs-them mentality and the police were more than happy to oblige that. Many police now view themselves as a class above and beyond normal citizens, where the rule of law doesn't apply.

      Citizens want police who are tough on crime. To do that, the police often resort to brutish and misguided tactics, leading to abuse of law abiding citizens. It's tolerated by the public because they typically share a naive view of the police that their actions are justified because they're The Law and they must have had a reason to do what they did.

      Being from portland, incidence of police brutality was a common thing for me to hear about. A friend of mine had her nose broken on a concrete driveway because she was resisting arrest. She's 5'3" and 115 pounds. You're telling me 2 grown men had to break a little girls nose to make her comply? Racial profiling occurs daily, and despite 20 years of police chiefs saying they will stop profiling - it continues on.

      In another case, during an arrest policeman Christopher Humphreys shot the suspect(a non-compliant 12 year old girl) with a bean bag from a shotgun at a range of about 3 feet to force compliance. There was widespread outrage among police because he was suspended for a short time because of the incident. This is the same cop who beat James Chasse to death(featured in the video I linked). Yes, you heard that right. He beat a terrified schizophrenic to death and was still an active duty policeman to beanbag a girl from 3 feet.

      In this case, the resistance to punishment comes from within the ranks and not from management. The portland police chief refused to suspend Humphreys so the Police Commissioner over-rode his decision. The chief, in addition to other likely reasons, refused to suspend Humphreys because the portland police officers union threatened a vote of no confidence in the chief, which could have cost him his job.

      In short, citizens tolerate use of force because they think the police are always justified in using it.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  2. Join in the deadpool by posting below by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I give it 48 hours till he's found dead in his cell by apparent "suicide" by drowning himself in a pissbucket

    1. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is assumed by the west that Russia has liberalized itself since the fall of communism. In ways it has, but anytime someone blows the whistle on the government there, forget IT!!! There are not as many innocent people in gulags as there used to be, but they are still there and they are still used. You will probably find his body soon. Putin would love to murder as many and even more people than his hero Joesph Stalin.

    2. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In ways it has, but anytime someone blows the whistle on the government there, forget IT!!!

      I'm not sure how you think that is different from anyplace else. Paypal just cut off Wikileaks' account, for example. This is their primary means of raising funding.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean how like the CIA recently suicided 3 detainees by hanging in Guantanamo bay?

      http://harpers.org/archive/2010/01/hbc-90006368

      The article seems credible. No way I could verify it obviously but it has enough detail that I think it could be verified easily by the FBI or DOJ. If you could get them to do their job, that is.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    4. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Upaut · · Score: 1

      I'll actually log in for this one...

      First, if it were me doing the "quieting of an unfavorable", I would seek anything to discredit him first. Get to his family to discredit him as a person, probably with threat of force and some other bribe. Then I would pressure his bosses to show he was on a termination list for something else, like paedophilia or something else quite heinous.

      In a case of a cop exposing corruption, and complaining about poor working conditions for the "good cops", this shitting on everyones parade including the government he is apealing towards? That doesn't take a normal assassination to quite, that would create a martyr; worse yet, a martyr for the people with guns. You need to start with character assassination.

      You then make it to be he was the worst of the worst, his career in shambles, everyone knowing he was a corrupt cop, and worse, a horrible husband, perhaps a rapist, etc. You make it so bad when you finally put him in a cell, his face covered by the spittle of those he tried to protect, then you make it easy for him to end the madness, his world turning into hell, to end it all. Sheets that make fine rope and high tie off places; razors that just pop out of the plastic casement and can be held in the hand; perhaps pills to quite the nerves and the nurse is called away with that bottle open on the counter. If he does himself in, he is only confirming his own guilt.

      And of course, if he has strong enough will not to kill himself, prison is a violent place. And he is a former cop. Its easy enough to say he picked a fight and was stabbed, or made a run for the fence to earn a double tap in the head.

      --
      3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    5. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Your sig is sort of disturbing when combined with your post...

    6. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by jimicus · · Score: 1

      First, if it were me doing the "quieting of an unfavorable", I would seek anything to discredit him first. Get to his family to discredit him as a person, probably with threat of force and some other bribe. Then I would pressure his bosses to show he was on a termination list for something else, like paedophilia or something else quite heinous.

      The Russian authorities have already demonstrated that they have absolutely no qualms about killing an unfavourable in a fairly high-profile fashion.

    7. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean how like the CIA recently suicided 3 detainees by hanging in Guantanamo bay?

      http://harpers.org/archive/2010/01/hbc-90006368

      The article seems credible. No way I could verify it obviously but it has enough detail that I think it could be verified easily by the FBI or DOJ. If you could get them to do their job, that is.

      Or how Bush biographer, J.H. Hatfield, commits suicide
      http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/07/20/blue/

      Or how Dr. David Kelly, who published facts inconvenient to Bush's poodle, commits suicide
      http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/830/blair_s_crisis_bush_s_crisis

      Or how Itojun, a lynchpin in IPv6 security which would have eliminated many network exploits not to mention Windows, died 'unexpectedly'?
      http://www.wide.ad.jp/news/press/20071031-itojun-e.html

      There are more. The list is already very long.

    8. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Kijori · · Score: 1

      According to the article he's been in jail for 3 days already, so I'm not sure that's a safe bet.

    9. Re:Join in the deadpool by posting below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you talk about the sig, quote it. Some have turned sigs off, you know.

  3. Re:Insert here by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia whistle blows you!

  4. How to read the English translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try putting on a Russian accent

  5. Re:Insert here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice. What was her number again?

  6. Corrupt cops act corruptly, film at 11 by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, was anyone really surprised? Mess with bad cops, and you'll come to a bad end. This is unfortunately true everywhere, including the United States.

    1. Re:Corrupt cops act corruptly, film at 11 by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter how common abuses of power are, they should never ever become so mundane as to not be newsworthy.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Corrupt cops act corruptly, film at 11 by johncadengo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. As the GP pointed out, this happens in the United States as well.

      Here is a recent story where a teenager was brutally beaten by plainclothes officers, who he alleges never identified themselves as police and he fought back because he thought he was being kidnapped. It is just horrible, and it won't stop until we make it stop.

      --
      My page.
    3. Re:Corrupt cops act corruptly, film at 11 by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      No matter how common abuses of power are, they should never ever become so mundane as to not be newsworthy.

      not in Russia... Seriously there's a lot of people who have died trying to speak out the problems in Russia... former military, journalists, and the list goes on...

      Unfortunatelly when peop...

      wait there's someone at the door......

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    4. Re:Corrupt cops act corruptly, film at 11 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No matter how common abuses of power are, they should never ever become so mundane as to not be newsworthy.

      In Russia, such things have became mundane a long time ago. It was actually rather surprising that he didn't find himself arrested immediately after the video was posted. The usual accusation in such cases is libel/slander, depending on the medium.

  7. He's probably safer in jail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than standing around outside waiting to be assassinated.

    1. Re:He's probably safer in jail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fish in barrels around the world would probably disagree with you.

    2. Re:He's probably safer in jail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fish in barrels around the world would probably disagree with you.

      Sure, there are a few cops who can access his jail cell. Outside, every cop and gangster in Russia can get to this guy. He's not safe in jail, but he's safer.

  8. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia cops arrest you. oh wait.

  9. In Soviet Russia... by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, police corrupt you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In present-day Soviet Russia there is still no real police. There is Militsiya !!!

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It is really just police in all but name. It's just an artifact of the time when Soviet Russia, in true communist spirit, had no bourgeois imerialist "ministers", but rather "people's commissars", and no reactionary "army officers", but rather "squad/platoon/company/... commander". The "revolutionary" names were mostly replaced with traditional ones by Stalin, but "militia" remained.

  10. He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by b4upoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did he lessen the status of corrupt bosses or the supposed glory of the state. Frankly regardless of which nation does this sort of thing the truth is that human history is dark and wicked and anyone foolish enough to actually believe that any nation's history is glorious needs a mental health professional and a lot of appointments.

    1. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      anyone foolish enough to actually believe that any nation's history is glorious needs a mental health professional and a lot of appointments.

      Good luck getting 75% of the American public into therapy. We pretty much did away with public funding for mental health services some years ago...

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    2. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia is just following its normal course, nothing to see there and nothing new to expect.

      "anyone foolish enough to actually believe that any nation's history is glorious needs a mental health professional and a lot of appointments."

      Glory isn't neat and pretty and seemless, but it certainly exists.

      Consider the Soviet soldier, who despite being horribly treated by his own government contributed more than any other group to destroying the Wehrmacht. Stalingrad and the many other brutal battles like it indeed had "glorious" outcomes, for glory is when man triumphs over such terrible adversity even it comes from other men.

      BTW one thing the Commies got right is war memorials that reflect the sacrifice of their people. Contemplate Mamayev Kurgan sometime...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one nation directly murdered more than 69,000,000 people and that is Russia!!!! Communist China comes close with 65,000,000 murdered under Mao!! China STILL executes 69,000 people a year, usually for political crimes(i.e. a powerful person does not like you). To say that you can't say any nation's history is glorious is like saying a person can't complain about Charles Manson because maybe the complainer doesn't recycle their batteries!! When someone points out an innnocent person going to the death chamber and someone else says "you're country isn't perfect" its the same thing as saying "so what" and "who cares?"

    4. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Frankly regardless of which nation does this sort of thing the truth is that human history is dark and wicked and anyone foolish enough to actually believe that any nation's history is glorious needs a mental health professional and a lot of appointments."

      Maybe you could let him have your slot. The sessions clearly haven't done you much good ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any memorials to the 3,000,000 Ukrainians Stalin starved to death for fun? The KGB put posters up at the time saying "It is considered barbaric to eat your children" because people were eating their own children's bodies to try to stay alive. Stalin did not like cannibalism, even if he caused it. What a guy!!

    6. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by stophatingalready · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      it's funny how all the tards who make ridiculous claims tend to hide behind anonymity.

    7. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please stop posting in this article!!! I can tell it's you this whole time because you keep ending your poorly-worded sentences with multiple exclamation marks!!! You do not have to use three exclamation marks!!! The exclamation mark is like the HTML {em}{/em} of natural language!!! Using it more than once is redundant!!! In fact, even using one in lieu of a period only dilutes your point!!! Save the exclamation marks for the really important points!!! Otherwise you sound like children, who don't know what their central point is so they blurt it out!!! Except children are adorable so they can get away with it and anonymous cowards on nerdy internet forums are not adorable!!!

      And we all know the world's a shitty place!!! Getting upset about it does very little but wastes time!!! The best we can all do is to live a moral life and intervene in problems only when we have the capability!!! And we don't have the capability because most of us don't live in Russia, and those that do can't form a large enough voting bloc/rebellious mob to get this thing fixed!!! And even if they could, the other guy's probably as much of a prick as Putin!!! That's just life!!!

    8. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

    9. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like two thirds of the whole population?

      Hint: think before you write such ridiculous claims.

    10. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*

      *stretch*

      *fart*

      '3,000,000 starved for fun' backed by a link to a wikipedia page which claims the the root cause of the famine is a subject of scholarly debate.

      lul

      It's usually more difficult to prove something if no one is left alive to talk about it. Dismissing it in such a cavalier manner, however, is simply despicable.

    11. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we below 75% already?

    12. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded or what? "Scholary debate" whether this genocide was intended or "just" side-effect of communism. You, sir, are moron.

    13. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does this have anything to do with the OP? you really need to deminish the sacrisifice

    14. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course; all Anonymous Cowards are the same person. Probably why "I" replied twice to your "lulz."

    15. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      BTW one thing the Commies got right is war memorials that reflect the sacrifice of their people.

      Any memorials to the 3,000,000 Ukrainians Stalin starved to death for fun?

      Non sequitur much? What does Holodomor has to do with Soviet WW2 memorials?

      By the way, the causes of Holodomor are still very much a debated issue. It doesn't help when both sides are actively falsifying documents. As one recent example, the official, state-run Holodomor "genocide memorial" exhibition in Ukraine used photos from - take that! - U.S. Great Depression, with captions claiming them to be photos of victims of Holodomor.

    16. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      BTW one thing the Commies got right is war memorials that reflect the sacrifice of their people.

      Most nations on earth get this one right. In Australia we have ANZAC day (25 April), to remember the ANZAC soldiers who have fallen on foreign lands. This day begins with a memorial service as dawn. There is Remembrance day (11 November), also for solemn remembrance for those who died in war. War memorials in Australia are inscribed with the names of dead soldiers and the words "lest we forget".

      There is a problem with nations that glorify war. Even the Confederate General Robert E Lee said "it is good that war is so terrible, lest we grow fond of it" (BTW, can you refer to a Confederate as being from the US?) but when the Iraq war was in full swing any reminder that we should be unhappy during a time of war was an instant mod down.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re: He Has Tarnished The Glory Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are an epic douche.

  11. Do not just type. Do something to help him! by reporter · · Score: 5, Informative
    The bravery of the policeman who risked his life by publicizing the corruption in his police department is remarkable proof that good people who think and act like Westerners still live in Russia. That he has been arrested and imprisoned is something that everyone on Slashdot knew would happen.

    Please. We should not merely talk and type about this tragedy. We should actually do something to help this victim of the Kremlin.

    For example, we could start a fund for his legal defense and possible eventual escape from Russia to the West. For the sake of humanity, we must not allow the Kremlin to kill him. The Kremlin has already killed too many innocent people.

    If this policeman dies mysteriously in prison, then I hope that someone -- anyone -- assassinates dictator Vladimir Putin.

  12. Re:Insert here by Smooth+and+Shiny · · Score: 1

    Kinky.

  13. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I do generally agree with your statement, this is something that really caught my eye

    is remarkable proof that good people who think and act like Westerners still live in Russia.

    possible eventual escape from Russia to the West. For the sake of humanity, we must not allow the Kremlin to kill him. The Kremlin has already killed too many innocent people.

    Can I borrow your time machine back to cold war? Being someone who has actually lived in Russia and some time in the neighboring countries too, I don't see this "Western vs Russia" thing or rant about 'Kremlin'. People in Russia are extremely good people and friendly towards another human being. Even more than in western countries or my own country, where people usually are careless about each other. There is corruptness (sometimes bad too), but you do not change everything in a few days after fallen communism. It is getting there and this is another example about it.

    But should you think "Westerners" as better persons for some reason? No. In fact, they're losing on that regard.

  14. Good Grief by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Sorry to say it, but this guy was on a "suicide mission". Whistleblower in Russia? The State Police are bad enough, the other guys are the Russian Mob. Good grief, either he's not married, or his wife has wisely left him bay now.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Good Grief by joocemann · · Score: 1

      So was Ghandi.

      The righteous don't give a f*** for their cause is more important than self.

    2. Re:Good Grief by horza · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your trophy wife will stick by you, unless you suffer an financial misfortune. I'm guessing he may have children, in which case he may hope they grow up in a world that is a better place than he has had to endure.

      Phillip.

  15. "The Law" doesn't always follow the Law by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "The U.S. Constitution sets a minimum standard. States can set standards that are MORE protective of individual rights than the U.S. Constitution, but they cannot go below the constitutional standard."

    In Palm Beach Florida County Florida they hold people up to 33 days without filing charges . They claim that they do not have to follow Fedral Law because they are a Commonwealth. They also claim that you don't have Miranda Rights, nor do you have a right to have an attorney appointed while in jail for those 33 days since no charges have been filed. So while you are technically correct, different states and counties handle things differently. We live in a much more Fascist society than most people realize.

    (And don't tell me this isn't true, or this was some rare and bizzare exception. I actually had this done to me when they illegally extended Marshall Law after a Hurricane a few years ago, and every person from Florida in the jail went to great lengths telling me that this is perfectly acceptable, and just how Florida does things.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:"The Law" doesn't always follow the Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was almost ready to believe you until you said "Marshall Law". If you don't even know what Martial Law is when talking about it, the rest of what you said is probably bullshit too. Of course, Martial Law is basically military rule and replaces (temporarily) civil rule. This would mean your courts and jails were being run by the military. Strange how your story is that this is "just how it is" in Florida and the military rules just happened to exactly line up with your made up Florida rules.

    2. Re:"The Law" doesn't always follow the Law by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Captain Murphy: Until we find the thief, I am declaring Martian law!
      Sparks: Um, I think its martial law.
      Captain Murphy: Silence! Under Martian law... uh... what are my powers, exactly?
      Sparks: Under martial law, you could suspend habeas corpus, empower a posse comitatus...
      Captain Murphy: That's crap. Mars is wild, untamed. I'm forming a cadre of Martian knights charged with enforcing Martian law.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  16. He knew what was comming... by badran · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you mess with the bear, you have to be prepared for the claws.

    In most CIS countries the police are corrupt. They have to be to survive, as their official pay is between 50 to 200 USD per month. And you need about 500 USD, so do the math... And you can see the picture.... Now if you also count the men in uniform who own cars that cost upwards of 6 figures "While making 200$"..

    Or this guy:
    http://tap-the-talent.blogspot.com/2008/12/judge-who-borrowedharvested-2mhr-2m.html

    Got the money via an OIU...

    In these systems the only people that are caught are the ones that are disliked by their higher ups, or the ones that turn out to be in the wrong time in the wrong place and then used as examples to others on the inside, as for the press-release the police will say "We are fighting the corruption..."

    1. Re:He knew what was comming... by Kijori · · Score: 1

      In most CIS countries the police are corrupt. They have to be to survive, as their official pay is between 50 to 200 USD per month. And you need about 500 USD, so do the math...

      I don't disagree with your overall assessment that the police are often corrupt, but the figures you give are a bit off - pay for a police officer in Russia starts at about 400 dollars a month (11,000 rubles), and outside Moscow you can certainly survive on that - when I was living there last year I could easily buy a day's worth of groceries for 100 rubles (~4 dollars), and I wasn't trying to save money - food grown domestically is just very cheap. And my rent was about 1000 rubles a month - ~$33.

      Again, that's not to say that your overall assessment is wrong, just that the police aren't forced into poverty by their pay.

      (Figures from http://www.moiplan.ru/view/Kakaya_zarplata_u_milicionerov.html

      Brief Translation:

      Question:
      I heard that the pay for police officers has increased. How much do police officers earn today?

      Answer:
      According to a press study by MVD Russia, in December 2008 police officers' pay was as follows: Officers: [...] 16900 rubles. Constables and patrol officers [...] 11300 rubles.)

    2. Re:He knew what was comming... by badran · · Score: 0

      I have more experience in Ukraine. You are right, the pay scale moved a bit. My info was based on older statistics. After some google-ing:

      -starting pay is about minimum wage which is about 800 hrivna which is about 100 USD.

      -A lieutenant pays in about 1300 hrivna (including bonuses, average for the whole country smaller cities and rural areas have a much lower pay, and Kiev's is a bit higher) Based on 2009 statistics.

      -You can spend about 100 hrivna (about 12 USD) a week per person for food.

      -Rent is about 100 USD or more for a 1 room apartment (higher in larger cities)

      -Utilities about 30 USD...

      The above are just the basic needs... medical care is free but you have to pay for everything and bribe the doctors to get any care.

  17. Russia Corrupt? No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russia, Iran, China, all great examples of what happens when the people get their own way. Some clever bastard comes along and dupes them.

    Russia: you overthrew your terrible govt, you had some semblance of democracy, now you have Putin.
    Iran: You had democracy, you had the shah, you overthrew the shah, then you voted for a dictatorship again. Good job.
    China: you had a civil war, multiple citizens based movements, you ended up with a shitty one. At least you let it happen right?

    Out of all 3 China probably had the least chance at democracy out of the bunch.

    What did we learn? That proles are stupid and you can't give someone a democracy until the limitations on the govt are understood and clear.

    1. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      :O I'm speechless. Please examine the role of the US in the political upheavals of Iran and Russia...

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    2. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Dude, the only period Russia had with some semblance of democracy was between 1. July and 24 October 1917.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't get rid of Putin... He's good for so many jokes.
      Yes, I am a selfish internet persona with no actual feelings for the people of Russia, in case you were wondering...

    4. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's France. Overthrew the Monarchy and got the Magna Carta.

      Your statement about the Proles says more about you then the Proles, I'm afraid.

      So what do you propose, sir? That people should just allow government to do as they like? Live a slave because all things will end up at that point anyway? Great. Simply marvelous. I'll go looking for my Pharoh tin foil hat after this post!

    5. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Russia: you overthrew your terrible govt, you had some semblance of democracy, now you have Putin.

      You do understand why Russia ended up with Putin, though, right?

      Russia had democracy, alright. It was also happy to get rid of the "shackles of the past", and was very naive to assume that the further it gets away from them, the better. So it subscribed to the most radical liberal economic (libertarian, for you Americans) theories there were at that point, and started to implement them at full force. Any negative changes were viewed as temporary side effects that would have to be endured until we finally get to the promised happy rich fat capitalist land.

      Fast forward 1 years... 5... 10... somehow, the happy land never materialized, and the country (and its population) got raped in the process. A new class of uber-rich people - very few in number, but owning most of the assets in the country - was formed, and proceeded to buy out the government wholesale.

      Ah, and all those people called themselves "democrats". And "liberals", too.

      The result is that the word "democrat" itself is a slur in today's Russia. It's no surprise that, when Putin came, with his KGB background and forced "macho chekist" image, the people flocked to vote for him: they hoped he'd gut the fat cats who took over under Yeltsin, and share the spoils. Heck, they didn't even mind if he wouldn't share the spoils, they just wanted bloody revenge.

      Another mistaken decision, but I can't blame anyone for it. It was an inevitable outcome of the way the country was ruled in the 90s.

      When your democracy is like Weimar, you end up with a fuhrer, eventually. That doesn't mean that there's a problem with democracy as such; it just means that it has to be properly executed.

    6. Re:Russia Corrupt? No way! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Iran: You had democracy, you had the shah, you overthrew the shah, then you voted for a dictatorship again. Good job.
      China: you had a civil war, multiple citizens based movements, you ended up with a shitty one. At least you let it happen right?

      Do you know what Shah Mohamed Reza and General Chiang Kai-shek have in common, they were both ruthless dictators who were propped up by foreign superpowers. The examples of China and Iran do not support your conclusions. Revolution in these nations occurred because people were left with not other choice. This usually results in the people choosing another dictator because they are the lesser of two evils.

      Iran is even worse, they had a stable democracy before the UK and US decided their aims would be better served by installing the Shah. So in effect it was not the Persian people who destroyed democracy, it was the CIA and MI6.

      What did we learn? That proles are stupid and you can't give someone a democracy until the limitations on the govt are understood and clear.

      In the end your argument boils down to a thinly veiled endorsement of fascism. The poles do not have the necessary intelligence to form their own government, thus the party should chose the leaders.

      Your evidence is flawed thus your assertions are wrong which ends up making your conclusions are moronic.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  18. It's more complicated a story than it appears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Dymovsky affair is more complicated than merely a whistle blower cop who had enough, went public, and is now being prosecuted. For starters in his videos his biggest complaints arent about the corruption in the Russian police, but about low pay, long hours, not enough vacation time and not getting overtime pay for overtime hours. Basically his rants aren't about the bad Russian cops but about the bad Russian government that doesnt pay its cops and Mr. Dymovsky in particular enough money. He also signals out his immediate bosses for special attention, but this is because his bosses were trying to get him fired for various things taking BEFORE he put anything on Youtube. Major Dymovsky had a habit of not coming into work for weeks at a time and there were numerous complaints about him basically alleging he himself was extorting various businesses for money before he put anything on Youtube.

    Yulia Latynina who is easily the best credentialed opposition journalist in Russia has dismissed Dymovsky as a fraud on her radio show and in editorials. His complaint isnt with the system but with his own place in it -- he is no opponent of the Kremlin, but a guy who was trying to secure his own position.

    His own ex-wife has called him mentally unbalanced. He had a messy divorce involving death threats and other assorted stories fit only for the tabloids. The core of the Russian opposition has attempted to distance itself from him which is why you wont find more than a single mention of his arrest on newsru.com. Kasparov's group is the only one that is still seemingly embracing Dymovsky, but that's no surprise as they are the most discredited of the opposition movements in Russia.

    1. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Although you don't put any sources, it's nice to actually see something in this discussion that look like facts instead of all the "name calling" going around in the thread.

      If I had mod point I would certainly mod you up.

    2. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      well, what do you know? there's another side to the story. it seems this mysterious reader "Max_W" lacks the intelligence to investigate anything past tin-foil conspiracy theories.

    3. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by Theleton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure you're right, but it's also true that most whistle-blowers have petty and selfish motives, and that they are often driven by personal grudges (which they tend to have a lot of, since they are generally quarrelsome and problematic people). Deep Throat apparently exposed Watergate because he was bitter about losing a promotion.

      It takes an unreasonable person to go up against the system and against the culture of one's organization. These people may not be personally admirable in the way we might like for a Hollywood good-guy/bad-guy story, but that doesn't make whatever revelations they provide less important. Nor does it make it OK to persecute them for it.

      Now maybe Dymovsky was arrested for some other shit he was involved in, but given Russia's history with internal critics, that would not be my first guess.

    4. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by absurdist · · Score: 1

      His own ex-wife has called him mentally unbalanced.

      Because of course, when I want the straight, unbiased scoop on someone, I always look to their ex-spouse.

      *facepalm*

    5. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit, Dymovsky is hero in Russia, #30873912 is total bullshit written by propaganda agent

    6. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Also Latynina is a "pet" journalist of regime, everybody knows. Nobody acknowledges that voices of someone like Elena Masyiuk or Natalya Morar' are nailing that Dymovsky's campaign is the most notable free speech campaign since probably early 20xx.

      Also I would like to tell why even when immigrated to Western countries Russian are extremely silent about their past. There is a reason why: they still fear that KGB remnants can get them even abroad; and in fact KGB (today's FSB) more than just able, they are killing people around the globe and second only to Qaeda and co. You need examples? Just google those: Yamadaev, Yandarbiyev, Litvinenko and I can continue this list for forever. All of them was killed abroad, on territories of developed Western countries on eyes of thousands people and cctv operators. And moreover this they are not just killing only famous persons who can really treat them, they virtually can kill any immigrant who has not ever been spotted in any kind of activities back in Russia just google it too.

    7. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by horza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know if there was an extended YouTube version I didn't see, but the one I did wasn't anything of the sort.

      Basically his rants aren't about the bad Russian cops but about the bad Russian government that doesnt pay its cops and Mr. Dymovsky in particular enough money.

      From what I remember, he was pointing out that the latter led to the former. I also don't remember him singling himself out for a pay rise above and beyond anybody else.

      Major Dymovsky had a habit of not coming into work for weeks at a time

      Something to do with suffering from stress, and the breakdown leading to the confession on video as he couldn't take it any more?

      there were numerous complaints about him basically alleging he himself was extorting various businesses for money before he put anything on Youtube

      That was his whole point, wasn't it? He couldn't afford not to, and in fact would be ostracized by his colleagues if he didn't.

      Yulia Latynina who is easily the best credentialed opposition journalist in Russia has dismissed Dymovsky as a fraud on her radio show and in editorials.

      Fair enough.

      His complaint isnt with the system but with his own place in it -- he is no opponent of the Kremlin, but a guy who was trying to secure his own position.

      By saying he can't take it any more, and will quite happily quit. Obviously has designs on Putins job (not).

      His own ex-wife has called him mentally unbalanced. He had a messy divorce involving death threats and other assorted stories fit only for the tabloids

      So he is a Russian Tiger Woods. Big deal. This has nothing to do with anything. I don't know how authentic the video appeal is, but I find the Anonymous Coward posting very unconvincing.

      Phillip.

    8. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yulia Latynina who is easily the best credentialed opposition journalist in Russia

      So that Slashdotters have some frame of reference, Yulia Latynina is also the author of the following words (from her 2009 article titled "The open society needs a new McCarthy"):

      The concept of "human rights" is diametrically opposite to the concepts of "justice" and "law" ... The defense of "human rights" was born in a struggle with totalitarian regimes ... and when totalitarianism was over, the concept of "human rights" became outdated.

      Now, granted, she is an opposition journalist in Russia. However, even many other people in opposition distance away from her because of views such as the one quoted above, and on U.S. political scale, she'd likely be identified as a neo-con (did I say she also supports the continued operation of Guantanamo?); on European scale, she's just batshit insane.

    9. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Also Latynina is a "pet" journalist of regime, everybody knows.

      Where "everybody" includes you & your friends?

      Latynina is very far from a pet journalist by any measure. Anyone who read any of her books knows that her criticism of the existing is rather scathing. It's just that it comes from an angle very different than what most everyone else does.

      Most opposition to the government in Russia today are either socialists and leftist liberals; a few are hardcore libertarians. Latynina's views are essentially the same as those of the U.S. neo-con movement. In particular, she's big on the "law & order" kind of thing, as well as "kill all terrorists wholesale".

    10. Re:It's more complicated a story than it appears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wait wait...wasnt there a reply about this a few posts back by Upaut (670171)

      Quote:

      by Upaut (670171) writes:
                      on Saturday January 23, @08:40PM (#30874530) Homepage Journal
      I'll actually log in for this one...

      First, if it were me doing the "quieting of an unfavorable", I would seek anything to discredit him first. Get to his family to discredit him as a person, probably with threat of force and some other bribe. Then I would pressure his bosses to show he was on a termination list for something else, like paedophilia or something else quite heinous.

      In a case of a cop exposing corruption, and complaining about poor working conditions for the "good cops", this shitting on everyones parade including the government he is apealing towards? That doesn't take a normal assassination to quite, that would create a martyr; worse yet, a martyr for the people with guns. You need to start with character assassination.

      You then make it to be he was the worst of the worst, his career in shambles, everyone knowing he was a corrupt cop, and worse, a horrible husband, perhaps a rapist, etc. You make it so bad when you finally put him in a cell, his face covered by the spittle of those he tried to protect, then you make it easy for him to end the madness, his world turning into hell, to end it all. Sheets that make fine rope and high tie off places; razors that just pop out of the plastic casement and can be held in the hand; perhaps pills to quite the nerves and the nurse is called away with that bottle open on the counter. If he does himself in, he is only confirming his own guilt.

      And of course, if he has strong enough will not to kill himself, prison is a violent place. And he is a former cop. Its easy enough to say he picked a fight and was stabbed, or made a run for the fence to earn a double tap in the head.

  19. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Generally, in cases such as these, people are really mean to badmouth the government, and they accidentally sound like they're badmouthing everyday [insert nationality here] citizens.

    This is the exact same reason that, in articles about the Chinese and their government, indignant natives post nearly the same kind of posts. We really aren't talking about you, personally. We know the average Chinese, Russian, American, Brit, whatever probably isn't the problem. We are nearly always talking about your government.

  20. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    Can I borrow your time machine back to cold war?

    No you can't. Putin and Bush stole it a long time ago.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  21. More details by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ironically, he is accused of "fraud abusing the official position" i.e. corruption. The investigation has started after "an appeal of concerned citizen" in December 2009, a month later his video post. Now, he was sentenced under accusation of threatening witnesses and is held in PTDC.

    Unfortunately, Dymovsky is pretty dumb. His speech is intermittent, unintelligent, with many errors (he is a cop after all). He admitted, that during a phone conversation (which was wire tapped) he said, that if he had been falsely sentenced he was going to avenge the investigator and the judge. But after admitting this, he said that he was just "testing if he had been eavesdropped and if Government was going to react". Well, it did, Einstein.

  22. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by 32771 · · Score: 1

    Well Russians are actually nicer people than Americans if you go by prisoners per capita. Here have a look at the map:

    http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph/cri_pri_per_cap-crime-prisoners-per-capita&b_map=1

    Russia has a higher murder rate though:

    http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita&b_map=1

    Now I'm conflicted. How do you define nice again?

    --
    Je me souviens.
  23. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by 32771 · · Score: 1

    Invade Russia during winter at your own peril.

    http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/minard

    --
    Je me souviens.
  24. Re:Nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o rly?

  25. I accept your apology by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    I accept your apology:

    Curfews were ordered in sixteen Florida counties including a 24 hour curfew in the barrier islands of Palm Beach and Singer Island. In addition, close to eight thousand National Guard troops were called in to maintain order. Some of the smaller airports including one in Tallahassee, the state capital, were closed. In addition, all of the popular theme parks were closed for up to two days, which resulted in a loss of $41 million dollars. A number of roads in Palm Beach County were simply unusable as they were submerged in up to four feet of water.

    And again, it was an illegal Martial Law. Yes, I spelled it wrong. I also thought Hurricane Frances was spelled as Francis. Do you really expect a common criminal to be able to spell! ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:I accept your apology by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You accept his apology ... for correctly pointing out that you're full of shit?

      NOTHING on that page backs up the claims you've made. It doesn't speak about the right to detain suspects in Florida. It doesn't say anything about the "commonwealth". It says nothing about Miranda rights. And, lastly, it doesn't say a fucking thing about martial law.

      If anything it shows that you're just making it up as you go along, since the measures mentioned in the article are much laxer than anything you spoke of, and none of it agrees with what you were claiming earlier. Either provide some evidence to back up your assertions, or be a man and admit that you're full of shit.

      As an interesting side-note, although I know little about Hurricane Frances, I do know that Martial Law was NOT declared in Florida, or anywhere else. The only people who claim that it happened are the far-right lunatics over at prison-planet. This is what happens when you get all your information from Alex Jones.

    2. Re:I accept your apology by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I do know that Martial Law was NOT declared in Florida, or anywhere else.

      Hey moron. I was there. It was in the newspapers. The Palm Beach County Sheriff specifically claimed he had the right to pose a curfew under Martial Law statutes. It was in the newspaper, and he used those exact words. My whole point was that he had no such right, so claiming he didn't because he couldn't just amplifies what a moron you are. The article specifically states that curfews were imposed and that the national guard was called in. I was arrested illegally. Oh, yeah, and did I mention that you're a fscking moron?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:I accept your apology by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Hey moron.

      Hi dumbass!

      I was there.

      Yay!

      It was in the newspapers.

      Then you should have no problem providing a link. I'm waiting with bated breath.

      The article specifically states that curfews were imposed and that the national guard was called in.

      Which doesn't require martial law. Try again?

    4. Re:I accept your apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to keep calling names, or are you going to actually source it?

    5. Re:I accept your apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's start a flame war! I'd offer to bring matches, but it looks like you two already have flamethrowers...

    6. Re:I accept your apology by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then you should have no problem providing a link.

      Right. Because I give a flying fuck if a fascist moron believes that what happened happened, and I try to convince people that continue to claim something didn't happen unless I provide a link after already providing a link and having that moron say "that doesn't count!"

      I'm waiting with bated breath.

      Your breath isn't bated enough, because you are also waiting with baited breath. I know. I can smell it from here.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re:I accept your apology by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You've now had two individuals give a detailed explanation of the problems with your claims, and have been asked for sources three times. You've not only failed to account for the discrepancies in your assertions, but have flatly refused to provide any data and have, instead, fallen back on childish ad-hominem attacks. I know that these facts don't mean much to you, but to any person with an IQ over 90 they are a clear admission that you have no idea what you're talking about. So go ahead, kept sputtering and venting; just don't expect anyone to care.

    8. Re:I accept your apology by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "... have, instead, fallen back on fallen back on childish ad-hominem attacks ...

      "I know that these facts don't mean much to you, but to any person with an IQ over 90 ..."

      ROTFLMAO

      Newsflash. Calling someone a liar, and then insisting they provide proof that it happened, and then denying it again once he obliges you makes you a moron. I admit that I stated the obvious, but it was hardly an "ad-hominem attack".

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    9. Re:I accept your apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll gladly kill any cop that declares a fucking curfew

    10. Re:I accept your apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, i would go along with them making sure to take mental note of names and badge numbers. after i was released, i'd bomb their houses, hopefully killing the cops and, if i'm lucky, their families too. whatever happened after that doesn't matter. execute me or lock me away but it will never bring back the lives that those cops took indirectly. i'm not about to lie down and be someone's bitch. if that means giving up my life to stand up for my rights, then so be it.

      if more people were willing to give their lives to preserve the rights/lives of others, the world would be a better place.

    11. Re:I accept your apology by tibman · · Score: 1

      That might be illegal.. depending on your country of course. Just FYI.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    12. Re:I accept your apology by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hey, he's from Florida. He can't help it.

      DISCLAIMER: I live in Tampa Bay myself...
      DISCLAIMER: This was funny. Har har. Laugh and move on.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  26. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Isn't Putin just the Prime Minister now? Term limits in Russia limited him despite his popularity as I recall. I am on a phone so I can no check.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    Mr Putin, I didn't know you had a slashdot account. How's the weather?

    Are we talking about the same friendly Russia that genocides population of "unfriendly" countries and installs puppet governments there to further repress the people? The same one that provokes another country into an attack in order to create jus ad bellum for an invasion and then annexes parts of that country? The one that runs exercise invasions of its neighbor near the border and claims that nuclear weapons could be used preemptively?

    Note that I'm not saying that Russians are bad people (though having lived in several CIS countries I don't fully buy your claim that people there are nicer to each other), we're talking mostly about governments and policy here. I see how you could be offended by the suggestion that somebody acting out against corruption behaves like a westerner, but objectively corruption is tolerated significantly less in western countries so it's not a completely wrong or unreasonable thing to say.

    Also, please don't start with "But, but Bush! Iraq!" line, everybody knows about it, it sucks, but it does not justify anything.

  28. dude, link please, I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I googled "Palm Beach County Sheriff martial law" and found nothing.

    1. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Troll

      They don't use the actual words Martial Law on the official website anymore. The Sheriff used those words at the time. This should be enough to prove that I didn't make the whole thing up, and for anyone who doesn't believe my post still, well lets face it, they are just trolls.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Martial Law"

      I don't think you know what that phrase means

      "they are just trolls"

      that one either.

    3. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by tibman · · Score: 1

      I read that link, sounds like the local police were trying to keep the peace. Probably sucks that you can't go out at night (after 10pm) but it was an emergency situation, right? If i was arrested trying to bring food to my family i'd be pissed though. But really i could just wait until 6:01 AM and bring the food over.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    4. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was very nice of you to provide him with an actual example!

    5. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Probably sucks that you can't go out at night (after 10pm) but it was an emergency situation, right? "

      No. That is what I have been saying. At the time I got arrested it was more than four days after the hurricane. All the lights worked, including streetlights. They were letting many cars pass, but I believe they pulled me over because I had an out of state plate (no extermely uncommon if that part of FL.) They were letting people go if they were coming back from the football game, but a women who went out for diapers got arrested. It was mayhem, but not because of the storm, which subsided days earlier. (Bear in mind that the link is to an official government website. Obviously they don't have any incriminating details)

      Again, when they cuffed me I told them I would not answer any questions, and that I wanted to invoke my right to an attorney at which point one of the six cops present told me I didn't have Miranda rights because I was in Florida. The public defenders office intially refused to represent me, telling me that I did not have a right to lawyer as no charges had been filed. I finally told them I was being held illegaly and they reluctantly gave in, but I continued to be held for 33 days, at which point they let me go, still with no charges even filed!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your parents raise you to be a liar, or did you decide to be one on your own?

    7. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by TheLink · · Score: 1

      He might not have been raised to be a liar, but he sure wasn't raised to be a diplomat ;).

      He might be telling the truth because if he talks to the cops the way he posts on Slashdot, I'm not surprised the cops in Florida gave him special treatment.

      --
    8. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Yeh because you should be jailed for not being polite to cops eh?

      Unfuckinbelievable.

    9. Re:dude, link please, I can't find it by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Yeh because you should be jailed for not being polite to cops eh?

      I don't think you understand how this "law" thing works. It's always baffling to me that there are people out there who have no clue how the legal system is structured.

  29. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That only applies to some.

  30. Russia's a great country. If you're White. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the "good-hearted" people of Moscow who will see to it that my Black ass gets well and thoroughly whooped if I dare walk their streets.

    I've been to 6 continents and several dozen countries. But I ain't going to Russia until it stops modeling its race relations on 1910 Alabama.

  31. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go read up on American History pre-Iraq and tell me we haven't done the exact same things, or that Europe hadn't before us, or just about every other major power dating back to the original City-States.

  32. OK, here goes... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia the whistles blow you.

  33. All kidding aside, please... by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    I saw this man's original video a while back (probably linked from /.). He's an honest cop trying to stand up for what he thinks is right. Any harm that comes to him as a result of his public denouncement of the corruption he was working with and under is an absolute horror in my mind. If anyone has any practical suggestions as to what to do about this, I'd love to, not only hear them, but apply as much assistance as I can muster.

  34. It is not about a policeman, it is about Internet by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Dymovskiy is immensely known in Russia, and he get this popularity via Internet, via Youtube videos, which were shown also on many local TV stations and websites in Russia.

    His arrest is not about what he said or did. He is not a man anymore, but sort of a media symbol. And it seems this new media, the Internet, disturbs many power holders in Russia.

    They introduce a new Internet (Intranet?) with Cyrillic letters in URLs this year. They tried to ban Skype in Russian Federation.

    But the Russian Internet community is fighting back: this creative video-protest "Hitler and Skype" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bxhs8jMnC7w in Russian language was viewed 1.6 million times, it is a large number for Russian Internet users.

    And it does not stop, but developing fast. A new video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5159imju2Q of a rap singer, which is breaking absolutely all unwritten taboos of a traditional Russian language and culture, was viewed 2.3 million times.

    This is what happening. The number of viewers of this new Internet stars and hits is approaching the number of viewers of a state-controlled TV media. And the government feels that it has to do something about it, because the taboos and social frames of the society are being overrun.

  35. Re:It is not about a policeman, it is about Intern by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Many people in Russia and FSU are buying computers and connect to the Internet, because they hear that it is where the action nowadays, but not on a boring controlled TV.

    The government cannot remove videos from Youtube, and it gives musicians, artists, journalists, bloggers an uncensored venue to express ideas and creativity. And it certainly attracts an audience.

  36. The man is pure moron by blue-slonopotam · · Score: 1

    I do not believe him. He might believe himself, but it is just plain stupid. He is being taken in custody for interfering with investigation. He explains it as "I was threatening the investigator, while talking on the phone with my friend not because I was going to injure him, but because I wanted to prove that the investigators were eavesdropping on my phone line illegally". What a joke. He is probably just mentally unstable.

    1. Re:The man is pure moron by Max_W · · Score: 1

      Does it not happen that someone says in a heat of a moment that he/she do this or that bad thing to someone? But saying something and doing it actually are different things, aren't they?

      If he said something in a private telephone conversation I am not sure that it constitutes a crime. Or maybe I am mistaken? Any legal opinion?

  37. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    Are you fucking retarded? I address this very issue in the last sentence of my post. Just because somebody else is as bad/worse is not an excuse for terrible behavior. Hell, let's all compare ourselves to Hitler, then we can get away with anything!

  38. Funny, you leave out the rest of the world by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    France: Sarkozy

    US: Bush and now a clipped Obama blamed for not being able to instantly change everything the republicans did wrong so to punish him, you give the republicans even more power.

    Britain: Oh okay these guys never had a revolution but still. Blair?

    Holland: Bakellende.

    Australia, Japan... the list goes on and on.

    As Douglas Adams said, people are a problem.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  39. Nothing too serious by FilatovEV · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dymovsky was detained for making threats against the investigators, as they say. There's a criminal case opened against him, they suppose he stole 1,000 USD of governmental money while serving as a cop. Whether he did it or not, it's nothing too serious to be concerned much about him. Read in Russian: http://lenta.ru/news/2010/01/22/appregend/ Given the broad Russian fan-club of Dymovsky, no wonder the story appeared at SlashDot.

  40. In Soviet Russia by bibekpaudel · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, you arrest cops !

    --
    one man's constant is another man's variable.
  41. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by pkphilip · · Score: 1

    You make two huge mistakes in one short post:

    who think and act like Westerners

    What? you think only westerners have the courage to stand up for their convictions? Or is it that you think non-westerners cannot possibly think for themselves? I guess you haven't heard of these people before:

    Mahatma Gandhi
    Aung San Suu Kyi
    Chinese dissident Wei Jingsheng
    Chinese dissident Hu Jia
    Nelson Mandela .. do I need to go on?

    If this policeman dies mysteriously in prison, then I hope that someone -- anyone -- assassinates dictator Vladimir Putin.

    Nice! calling for the head of state of one of the largest countries to be assassinated!!

  42. In Soviet Russia by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    They didn't warn your ass before they arrested you. This is progress. Russians are thankful for Putin's soft fascism. It's not the cops fault this guy has a hearing problem when he was told to cut the shit out.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  43. Re:It is not about a policeman, it is about Intern by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    So, what you're saying is the Russians are so backwards we should just be glad they don't make their women wear burkas, right?

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  44. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Russia the president can only serve two consecutive terms but there is no limit on the number of terms overall. So Medvedev is warming the seat for one season, then guess who is prez again? This is what Russians think about it and most of them tend to like it that way. On the whole it's still far from a true democracy but getting there. Baby steps, baby steps.

  45. Re:Insert here by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    I was actually going to go with:
    In Soviet Russia, Youtube watches you!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  46. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by ChristianMc · · Score: 0

    You bring up a good point about the Russians as a whole. Yes, there are plenty of them that are good people, but you can find good people in any country. I don't think "reporter" meant to insult the people of Russia, but its government ONLY, a field in which America is still winning. Hey, I wish it was different, but it isn't.

  47. Re:It is not about a policeman, it is about Intern by Max_W · · Score: 1

    I want to say that the real changes in Russian society just start to begin. Even cops like this Aleksey Dymovskiy started to notice that something is wrong, that the society has its sicknesses, which it has to address and treat, in order to heal.

  48. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People in Russia are extremely good people and friendly towards another human being.

    Which is, of course why all neighouring countries love Russia so much and bend over backwards to escape the clutches of the evil European Union and get closer to Russia. Just ask some of the people like the Latvians, Finns, Poles, Romanians, Czechs, Estonians or others who had to deal directly with Russian friendship and benevolence over the years what they think about the extreme goodness of Russia and the Russians. Ask the Jews who lived in Russia about the friendliness of Pamyat and similar organization of good Russians.

  49. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    People in Russia are extremely good people and friendly towards another human being.

    In reality, this simplistic view is just as wrong as the (more prevalent) opposite one.

    The truth is that average Russians can be more friendly in close social encounters, but more hostile outside of them.

    From personal experience, if you walk up to a random person you do not know on the street, and ask for directions, you're much more likely to get a friendly response on the streets of Auckland, Vancouver or Seattle than Moscow. Similarly, if you get into some kind of trouble (e.g. beaten up by some punk) on the street, people would be less less likely to intervene to help you.

    On the other hand, people whom you know, even briefly - like coworkers - tend to be more open and friendly to you than Americans or Canadians are in similar situations.

    On the whole, I wouldn't say that Russians are better or worse than Westerners. Personally, I prefer it in the West, but it's because I appreciate the overall level of politeness in day-to-day interactions between people who do not know each other, and I always had very few )but close) friends even in Russia, so the benefits weren't that important for me. I can certainly see how it could be exactly opposite for others.

    It is getting there and this is another example about it.

    Who is getting where?

    Russians != Russian government != Russian state (this applies to every nation, by the way).

  50. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by mjwx · · Score: 1

    But should you think "Westerners" as better persons for some reason? No. In fact, they're losing on that regard.

    This isn't saying much about Russians, compare both to Asian societies and both are extremely rude.

    My experience with Russian people have caused me to determine that there is no such thing as a queue in Russia (I am of British decent, I know what a queue should look like), I was in the Immigration line at Phuket International Airport where a Russian jumped from the other line in front of me and walked up to the Immi desk, I informed this person that the line started back there pointing over my shoulder but I was met with a death stare. Fortunately karma was not on their side and they were dragged off into the back (probably due to Visa issues, Thailand is kind of strict on Visas). I did utter the words Som Nam Na (got what you deserved, in Thai) as Thai police escorted them away, this got a bit of a muffled laugh from the Thai person behind me.

    Now I readily accept that there are many different types of people within one society, in Australia we have our better people and our worse people and this is true for all cultures. Judging a society solely on the merits of it's worst individuals is a terrible method. If I were to judge all Eastern Europeans on my experience at Phuket International Airport, would you not have a problem? There are many different types of westerner (Australian, American, British, Canadian, French, German, Irish, Italian, Scottish and more) and most of these societies have radical differences, even between Australians and Americans there are big differences and our peoples are considered to have a lot in common.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  51. Re:Do not just type. Do something to help him! by 32771 · · Score: 1

    Oops, they don't even need winter to freeze to death in Russia.

    --
    Je me souviens.