Slashdot Mirror


The Wi-Fi On the Bus

theodp writes "For students who endure hundreds of hours on a school bus each year in a desert exurb of Tucson, the Wi-Fi on the bus improves the ride. Last fall, school officials mounted a $200 mobile Internet router from Autonet Mobile to bus No. 92's sheet-metal frame, enabling students to surf the Web. What began as a hi-tech experiment has had an unexpected result — Wi-Fi has transformed the formerly boisterous bus rides into a rolling study hall, and behavioral problems have virtually disappeared. 'Boys aren't hitting each other, girls are busy, and there's not so much jumping around,' said J. J. Johnson, the Internet Bus driver."

241 comments

  1. Not good. by John+Hasler · · Score: 0

    > 'Boys aren't hitting each other, girls are busy, and there's not so much
    > jumping around,'

    This is not good (but then neither are public schools).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, our kids are being calm and serene and staring at some screen! This is perfect! If we do our job they'll be completely addicted to various boxes with moving colors and become totally sedentary and quiet.

    2. Re:Not good. by colmore · · Score: 1

      Nothing like the hypnotic effects of glowing rectangles to lull the children into a dull trance.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    3. Re:Not good. by Jean-Luc+Picard · · Score: 1

      Yes, we need continues horseplay in a moving vehicle

    4. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but were you trying to spell "continuous"? Maybe commenting in a forum on education isn't really where you should be.

    5. Re:Not good. by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

      Hey, try talking in a French forum, you perfectly unilingual arsehole.
      Show us your stuff, maudit tabernaque..

      --
      - Ecsad Essemal
      The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
    6. Re:Not good. by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      My guess would be "continued"; s being next to d, it's an easy typo to make.

    7. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give Picard some slack, he's from France. English is a secondary language to him.

  2. the wheels on the bus go by masmullin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... round and round, round and round round and round. The wheels on the bus go round and round...

    What does the wifi on the bus go?

    1. Re:the wheels on the bus go by Shikaku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Up and down... up and down. the wifi on the bus goes down and then, all peace ends.

    2. Re:the wheels on the bus go by Erinnys+Tisiphone · · Score: 1

      Well done ^_^ But you know that's just because they're all playing World of Warcraft and Left for Dead.

  3. A rolling study hall? by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt it.

    1-to-10 says they're all on facebook.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:A rolling study hall? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      or 4chan...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:A rolling study hall? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or (shudder) Slashdot.

    3. Re:A rolling study hall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1-to-10 says they're all on facebook.

      Which they probably are in the non-rolling study halls as well.

    4. Re:A rolling study hall? by symes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt it.

      1-to-10 says they're all on facebook.

      All in their virtual worlds bullying each other. Just 'cos they are quiet doesn't mean they are being good ;)

    5. Re:A rolling study hall? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too: *"STUDY"*? ROFLOL!!!!

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:A rolling study hall? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      RTFA, snarkhead.

    7. Re:A rolling study hall? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Probably. But I doubt they were studying on the bus before the WiFi anyways, so it's a wash.

      That said, within a few years I bet WiFi will be moot anyways since all those devices will have mobile broadband from the cell network anyways. At the conferences and meetings I attend, hunting around for WiFi has become really passe; people have mobile broadband cards for their laptop, or just do everything on their blackberry.

    8. Re:A rolling study hall? by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      All in their virtual worlds bullying each other.

      The name calling, while not the least bit pleasant, didn't bother me nearly as much as the physical torments I was subjected to. Now granted the school did have a strict "no violence" policy but for some reason it never really applied to bullies, though I was suspended a few times when I fought back. Talk about demoralizing the childhood experience, knowing that your tormentors will never be punished for their actions while every punitive rule will be applied to you should you try to make it stop.

      I might have actually enjoyed my childhood school experience more if everyone spent their time calling me names in cyberspace rather tossing around my lunch, school books, or any other possession I had on me while mockingly saying "Come on guys, give it back." then knocking me to floor, blaming the bus driver for hitting bumps, over and over again.

    9. Re:A rolling study hall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that an old tech site that was really popular in the 90s? I wonder what happened
      to it. I guess they closed up shop some time ago.

    10. Re:A rolling study hall? by catd77 · · Score: 1

      "Hey guys guess what!,MY eggplants are done in Farmville!"-Student on the WiFi bus.

    11. Re:A rolling study hall? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      1-to-10 says they're all on facebook.

      , or myspace, creating fake profiles impersonating each other and posting crap to people chess classmates. "Bullying" has changed to embrace technology.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:A rolling study hall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One thing that works is going for the jugular - well, you can't really kill classmates without getting the law involved, but bullies bothered me because I tried listening to the teachers and "just ignored" them. This only made things worse.

      What worked? Breaking one bully's nose. Bruising another's kidney, sending him to the doctor. Breaking another's cheek bone. They learned that I can fight back, but just don't want to. It quickly ended. Sure, I got suspended for a week, but they never, ever bothered me again after that.

      Of course, that was back in the early 80s. Nowadays fighting back lands one with assault charges, while the criminals (bullies) are treated as the victims.

    13. Re:A rolling study hall? by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      The girls are on facebook, chatting about the guys. The guys will wait for study hall and school to be on facebook. Right now they are in the back of the bus on porn sites.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  4. behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "behavioral problems have virtually disappeared" --- well, that depends on what you consider a behavioral problem. I find it healthier for a bunch of kid to be noisy and hyperactive (even if this involves occasionally hitting each other) than to be all hunched down on their 7'' netbooks checking Facebook.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe it's just me, but I prefer if bullies minded their own business and left the more intellectual of us alone.

      The school playground is notorious for encouraging the torment of "nerds" and other social outcasts. If the bus can be turned into another safe zone, that is a good thing, in my e-book.

    2. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by hitmark · · Score: 1

      maybe at school or similar, but in a bus with the only adult present being the driver?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The school playground is notorious for encouraging the torment of "nerds" and other social outcasts.

      And they are outcasts because...?

      I was bullied and tormented myself. Looking back now, my only regret is that I didn't have the parental and peer support on how to deal with it - instead I was taught to keep my head down and avoid it. As a result, I grew up with few social skills and lonely as a result.

      As I examine people, especially successful ones, the thing I noticed is that the most successful people are not the smartest or the best looking: it's the ones that are charming, have the gift for gab, and can relate to people - social skills. Sure, being tall and good looking really helps - I won't deny that - but that's out of your control. Whereas, learning to relate to others is something that can be learned and the earlier the better.

      I know some very intelligent people who were left in the dust career wise by less intelligent people because they just wouldn't learn to relate to people - and I mean wouldn't and not couldn't. They degrade people skills as being for the cheer leaders and "jocks" and sales droids.

      Even if you have Asberger's or in my case Schizoid personality disorder, you can still learn - and I've been doing my best because I'm tired of being an outcast - it's done nothing for me.

    4. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid, I got tired of all the mocking and bullying. One day, I snapped and threw a bully down a short set of stairs. Luckily, this was before the days where fighting in school got you arrested, and I only got a detention. However, I let it be known that I wasn't going to put up with that kind of crap anymore, and it virtually stopped around my friends and I.

    5. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      Why is the Slashdot house view that kids should always be doing exactly what kids 50 years ago were doing? Since when is stuffing a large number of kids in a cramped space for hours with little to do considered important for their development? Anyway, this is high school students. What's so wrong about them using laptops and the internet?

    6. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fuck you for blaming the victims.

    7. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Since when is stuffing a large number of kids in a cramped space for hours
      > with little to do considered important for their development?

      Since public schools were invented.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do have Asperger's Syndrome (diagnosed by a professional, not self-) and was a frequent punching bag at school. It made me very twitchy, suspicious, and cynical. I also developed a high tolerance for physical and emotional abuse. It drove me to learn multiple forms of martial arts, hand-to-hand combat, and serve in combat arms in the army.
      It's rather interesting that the "average" grunt has a higher than average IQ. He just has deep psychological issues that need to be worked out. In someone else's flesh. I very nearly took a "job opportunity" with "a family organization", but chose a different path.

      If you want to create a killer, subject them to random abuse when they are young. Dog, human. Doesn't matter.

      Anything harmless, that will redirect and reduce the violence rendered upon the children, should definitely be evaluated and seriously considered.

    9. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      well, that depends on what you consider a behavioral problem. I find it healthier for a bunch of kid to be noisy and hyperactive (even if this involves occasionally hitting each other) than to be all hunched down on their 7'' netbooks checking Facebook.

      Well yano...this comes from the same organization that would rather have their kids hopped up on amphetamines than acting like kids.

    10. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As with many things, this is easier said than done.

      When you're treated as an outcast, and no matter what you do, you're not allowed to be part of the crowd, you have no choice but retreat to the sides and spend time with the few friends you do have.

      I had no interest in sports when I was a kid. I still don't, other than sometimes watching the Superbowl or World Series because they can be fun. That, combined with my intense interest in everything geeky, made me an outcast. What should I have done, pretend to like something I don't just so I could hang out with people who don't like me anyway?

      I'm sorry, I'd rather have a small handful of friends I like than a large number of "friends" who I don't care for. I'd rather not have to pretend to be someone I'm not in order to get ahead. Abandoning who you are to conform to an ideal you don't care for is a heck of a lot worse than just accepting you are not part of the "in crowd" and working to live a happy life among those you *can* relate to.

      So seriously, wake up, stop blaming yourself. Blame our culture for excluding those who are intellectual. Many other countries aren't like this; their scientists are celebrities. I wish we could be more like them.

    11. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by morari · · Score: 1

      Bingo. The only way to stop bullying is to make it an undesirable activity. The quickest and easiest way to do that is to beat the bully's brains out one day. ;)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    12. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bingo. The only way to stop bullying is to make it an undesirable activity. The quickest and easiest way to do that is to beat the bully's brains out one day. ;)

      Much better to sabotage his car. With luck you might bag his GF or his asshole parents, too.

    13. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like it's all in your head. I really doubt you've done anything that can qualify your claims. It sounds more like confirmation bias.

    14. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by cvtan · · Score: 1

      Grown ups cannot help you deal with a bullying problem. I am not a big supporter of violent responses, but in my experience, the only thing that works is to punch the bully in the nose. This is unfortunate, but true.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    15. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Me too

      Part of school is the social dynamic; yeah I was a outcast nerd, but I got most of my meager mixed social experience from school. It is one of the few controlled environments where you are forced together and taught to interact and communicate. This is very important.

      Also I have issues of children being distracted from the outside when in vehicles, I fear that might lead them to difficulty in paying attention to whats going on outside when they learn to drive.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    16. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Krannert+IT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many other countries aren't like this; their scientists are celebrities. I wish we could be more like them.

      I would have to disagree with your conclusion. Scientists can be celebrities in any country. The celebrities you speak of have social skills. In the US many scientists have taken on celbrity status, look at Stephen Hawings (while not from the US he is celebrated in this country), Michio Kaku, as well as many others. They all have social skills which MUST be developed in order to attain their status. Other than fellow scientists, who really cares about your chosen subject unless you can explain to them why it is important.

      Don't get me wrong, it is not acceptible to abuse other people, I am not at all in favor of beating people up or picking on them. I am not saying that victoms aren't victoms, just that building social skills is critical if you want to be part of society. You can have an IQ of 180 but if you can't communicate with anyone why should anyone else care?

    17. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by raddan · · Score: 1
      I was in the same boat with you for a long time. I will share two things with you that made me "come out of my shell":
      • relax
      • don't make yourself a victim

      I know those sound trite, so I will elaborate. I'll start with not making yourself a victim, because for me, that was the turning point.

      Up until the time I was in the 7th grade, I had essentially the same experience as most of the 'nerds' here. I was called 'nerd' repeatedly, and because I played saxophone and flute in the band (hey, I liked classical music), I was also called a 'fag', etc. At the time I was called these things, I thought I'd just shrug them off-- they don't bother me-- but in retrospect, they did quite bother me. Anyway, I wore glasses, and like to read during recess. Standard-issue nerd.

      Now, for whatever reason, the big bully of this particular school, Tony, decided it was my time to get pushed around. I had evaded his attention partly because I was new to the school (had just moved in from another state) and because, man, it was so fun watching my other friends squeal. In Tony's defense, my other 'nerd'-friends really did put on a nice show. Anyway, one day, Tony pushed me as I walked down the hall. He walked behind me, stepping on the backs of my shoes, pushing me some more.

      Now, I had thought a lot about this particular moment, and I decided that the only course of action was something of a "shock and awe" response (I was surprised, when I later read Ender's Game as an adult, that the same logic was applied there, although I had no intent to KILL anyone). So I pushed him back. But not a small push. I basically just used all my strength. I knocked him off his feet, and because we were near the gymnasium area, he fell backward and hit his head on the crossbar to a street hockey net. It knocked him out.

      The gym teacher who was there was PISSED. And I was, inside, terrified of what was going to happen. What happened, though, was this: the bullies ramped up their rhetoric for awhile ("I'm gonna KILL you!"), but after seeing this was ineffective, they eventually left me alone. I wasn't good at 'trash talk', so I just glared angrily. I later learned that girls thought this was 'manly'-- but I kept my mouth shut because I didn't know what to say! In any case no one ever laid a finger on me for the rest of my schooling. Later in high school, when I became the top XC runner in the league (yes, XC is the true nerd's sport), I had these same guys asking me for training advice. Imagine that. Complete 180.

      But the lesson was: you have a great deal of control over what other people think of you.

      Sounds easy, right? I know you're thinking it's not. And this brings me to the second point, this social paralysis that a lot of us suffer from. Even now, there are times where I am expected to go to a social outing, and... I just can't seem to do it. It's not that I don't want to. I do.

      I've thought a lot about the cause of that, and I've concluded that, for me at least it's: what if I do something stupid? They're all going to laugh at me. I couldn't handle it.

      But the truth is: they're not going to laugh at you. In fact, the vast majority of people couldn't care less if you do something stupid. Relax. I know, it's easier said than done. It takes mental toughness to walk through this door sometimes.

      For me, it comes down to: I would rather live my life than not. If that means I make a few mistakes, so be it. I've done and said stupid things, but I don't bother turning them over and over in my head. It's in the past. Move on. Live and learn. That strategy has allowed me to do well in life. I'm married to a beautiful and intelligent woman (who doesn't care that I like to come home and watch Star Trek), I manage a department at work, I work on the projects that I want to, and I've accomplished most of the goals I set out for myself.

      It's easy to let your inherited problems or your particular circumstances stop you from doing things. The only one who can do anything about that is yourself. Start today.

      OK, enough pep talk.

    18. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

      I would have loved for this technology to have existed when I was in elementary school. We had ridiculous rules in place that even once we had arrived at school, nobody could leave any of the schoolbusses until all of the schoolbusses had arrived. It was a breeding ground for sadism.

    19. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a geek since elementary school but my parents had the good sense to encourage me to also study martial arts from a young age. When idiots decided they wanted to pick on the nerdy kid they had a rude awakening. I spent more than a couple afternoons in the principal's office, but after about the third time of a bully getting their ass handed to them they settled down. Granted, I had the physical stature to actually confront bullies but my stand had benefits for everyone in my class who ended up not having to worry about being bullied.

      Fighting isn't a solution to every problem but if you teach a bright kid how to defend themselves they'll figure out how to use it to make their's and other's lives just a little better.

    20. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Fuck you for perpetuating the problem and contributing nothing toward the solution.

    21. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. I was a social outcast in grade school (and to a lesser extent high school), and generally saw socializing as a complete waste of time. I had a mild amount of tormenting and bullying, the bullying stopped with one surprise attack, and the getting picked on stopped when I made friends with a few of the girls those doing the tormenting wanted to date (I only realized this was why they stopped in retrospect). I never developed an interest in sports, cars, or any of that normal stuff. Going away to a state college pretty much fixed my outcast situation, though. After graduating I can say with 100% certainty that the best things I got out of college were the friends I made, and the social skills that help me ace job interviews and interact with co-workers .
      And, it's helpful to realize that, everyone has some weird hobby or interest that they don't often talk about. Share one of yours and you can usually get them to talk about theirs, and you can get away from the standard topics of conversation. A perfectly "normal" person is completely generic with no substance, and those people don't have any actual friends (just acquaintances).

    22. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I broken the handle on my clarinet case when I hit a bully with it. They left me alone after that.

    23. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just me, but I prefer if bullies minded their own business and left the more intellectual of us alone.

      In sovie^Wwifi-enabled bus nerds are bullying the bullies by breaking into their FB accounts.

    24. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Snarf+You · · Score: 0

      I broken the handle on my clarinet case when I hit a bully with it. They left me alone after that.

      Were you broughten to the principal's office as a result?

    25. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So seriously, wake up, stop blaming yourself. Blame our culture for excluding those who are intellectual.

      What does "intellectual" have anything to do with it? Unless you're just assuming that because someone is bullied, therefore they must be an "intellectual" person?

      It has nothing to do with intellect, it has to do with social skills. If you didn't have the social skills, you're still going to be bullied-- and avoiding other people doesn't help improve your social skills, so in that measure I agree with the grandparent.

      Or look at it this way, by your logic, Ralph Wiggum from The Simpsons is only outcast because he's smarter than everybody else in the class, right? And don't tell me your school didn't have a Ralph Wiggum.

      If I'm bad at bowling, I'll get low scores. If I don't practice bowling, I'll get worse at it. Now in this example, maybe I don't care about bowling-- that's fine. But if you don't care about social interaction, I can guarantee you're going to have a miserable, lonely life... you can't just avoid it and trust everything to turn out fine.

    26. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not an intense interest in everything geeky that makes one an outcast. I openly admit to being a nerd with interests in geeky stuff, jocks and girls alike. The key is, I don't feel secretly shameful about it in the back of my head. To me, my frame of mind is, it's awesome, and you should think it's awesome too.

      And don't feel like you're "pretending" to be someone you're not. Rather, it's better to keep an open mind about the things other people like. Football may not be your forte, but it clearly excites people, some to the point of insane zealousness. That's what interests me, and I can get into that.

      So seriously, wake up, and stop blaming yourself. ALL other countries (the whole of humanity) are like this. I'd never want to be a dumb jock, but I'd also never want to be a nerd who is ashamed of who he is just because social media said I should be.

    27. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by mstahl · · Score: 1

      I know some very intelligent people who were left in the dust career wise by less intelligent people because they just wouldn't learn to relate to people - and I mean wouldn't and not couldn't. They degrade people skills as being for the cheer leaders and "jocks" and sales droids.

      Then, in the end, they're not that intelligent are they? I was picked on a lot in school, 'cause if I'm being perfectly honest here I am a huuuuge nerd. There's just no point in denying that when I'm here, posting this comment on Slashdot. The difference came when about halfway through high school I found out that a couple of people I'd written off as total douchebags were actually very smart, and their behaviour was largely a social ruse. I figured I could do the same.

      Also, one thing that seriously helped was going to college all the way across the country from where I went to high school. Nobody I met in my first year at college knew I was a huge nerd in high school so they didn't treat me like one, then by the time I had to retreat into myself more because of my heavy computer science courseload, I already had a nice circle of friends going. I'm not saying the transition is easy but it is possible if you have made the decision to see yourself differently, and thus have everyone else perceive you differently. Things like Asberger's make it a lot harder but not impossible.

    28. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of parallels in this to my own story.

      I would add to it the following:

      Find at least one physical activity that you truly enjoy will do wonders for your self-confidence. Find a local martial arts instructor, join an extra-curricular weight-lifting program at your high school, take up rollerblading. It doesn't have to dominate your life, but being well-rounded includes physical as well as intellectual pursuits. You will feel better about yourself, and vitamin D deficiency (lack of sunlight exposure) contributes greatly to depression.

      Take the initiative to do something and change your circumstances.

      Being intellectual and having a lack of social skills do not necessarily go hand-in-hand, but once you develop those patterns it becomes very hard to break them in your adult life.

      I've thought a lot about the cause of that, and I've concluded that, for me at least it's: what if I do something stupid? They're all going to laugh at me. I couldn't handle it.

      But the truth is: they're not going to laugh at you.

      This, right here. Actually, sometimes they will laugh at you. The trick is to not withdraw or attack if people laugh. As long as your reaction is not one of those two things, you'll be fine and people will think you the better for it (whether they say so or not).

    29. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by black88 · · Score: 0

      Really? You are not being dramatic? DAMN!! Nice work.

      "The strong inherit the earth, the meek inherit the yoke"

    30. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Oloryn · · Score: 1

      He's not blaming the victim. He's just saying that it's possible for the victim to stop being victimized without having to rely on other people to do it for him. This is, of course, abject and horrifying heresy to some political and sociological viewpoints.

    31. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Way to go blaming the victim here. The problem of bullying is due to the bullies, not due the kids with "insufficient social skills" not learning how to take their bullying correctly.

      Sure, I agree that social skills are important. However, having good social skills are no guarantee that bullies will avoid you. The only guarantee of that is to ensure that the bullies aren't near you.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    32. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      Then, in the end, they're not that intelligent are they?

      Yes, they are. Intelligence is but one part of what makes you successful; that's the whole point.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    33. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by mstahl · · Score: 1

      If you completely disregard the value of social skills, you're not very intelligent. That's what I said and I stand by it. Disregarding the value of social interactions and the value of being able to navigate those interactions effectively and the value of being likable is a stupid thing to do. Intelligence is but one part of what makes you successful, yeah, but understanding what will make you successful is part of being intelligent.

    34. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      I agree, in fact I'm surprised at how many people on /. think it's a bad thing these kids get to spend a few otherwise unproductive hours surfing. After all, how many of you are commenting /. when you could be accomplishing something else? How many of you played gameboy or Game & Watch systems on the bus as a kid, and how is this much different?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    35. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I find it healthier for a bunch of kid to be noisy and hyperactive (even if this involves occasionally hitting each other)

      I hate it when people invoke Columbine, but... almost anything which reduces bullying is a good thing. If I'd had access to a gun when I was being bullied at Harbor High School in Santa Cruz, California, a practice essentially encouraged by the faculty who would single out people like me for negative attention, I'd have happily used it. It had got to the point where it was physically hard for me to get out of bed because I knew what I was going into. Anything short of abuse of the bullies would have been positive. Unfortunately, nothing was ever actually done. I assume the situation persists to this day. Public school is child abuse of a particularly insidious sort because even those who are not bullied are conditioned.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by lilo_booter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can still be accepted even if you make it apparent that you have no interest in a particular thing that those around you like. A joke, a kindly word, tolerance - all good. Detachment, arrogance, superiority, forming cliques - yeah, well those are traits which are gonna get you in trouble in all walks of life.

      There are cries of 'yeah, blame the victim' and 'blame society' here, and well, sorry, but yeah, in some cases the victim is at fault. Or the victim's parents. And sometimes, they aren't and it's just down to the bully. Or their parents.

      But society? It is a sum of its parts, and the parts include the victims, the bullies and those who are neither. As a result, blanket statements like 'Blame our culture for excluding those who are intellectual' simply doesn't wash - intellectuals can do that all on their own by alienating others....

    37. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the charm and people skill we (well in may case) despise.. it's the bullshit that come out of their mouth sometimes.. Lie with a smile

    38. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by silverspell · · Score: 1

      And they are outcasts because...?

      Yes, a lack of social skills will help to make someone an outcast in middle/high school. But there are plenty of kids out there who have great social skills and still get shat on nonetheless, because human beings have a seemingly hardwired antipathy towards difference.

      You can do everything right: be funny and quick-witted, able to relate, and whatever else. But if you're different from other kids in a way that codes negatively, they won't accept you, and rest assured, they will fuck with you if they can. If you're an effeminate boy or a butch girl growing up in a place like the deep South, you will be harassed. If your family is the wrong race or religion, and you live in an intolerant place, you will be harassed. If your family can't afford to buy you attractive or fashionable clothing, you will be harassed. If you're a guy and you're bad at sports -- weak, uncoordinated, clumsy, fat -- you will be harassed. If you're a girl and you're dumpy, awkward, and poor, you will be harassed.

      Whenever bullying comes up, there's this recurring Slashdot fantasy that all this will stop if you just "stand up to them" -- that if you present yourself as a potentially violent actor, the bad guys will eave you alone, or even accept you. Yet for many kids, that's not realistic: no matter how much you exhort them to lift weights and take martial arts classes, they'll never, ever be able to competently handle themselves in a fight. (Being physically and socially clumsy is an Asperger's trait by definition.)

      And even if they can improve somewhat, do you really think some skinny-ass, asthmatic, glass-jawed nerd can hold his own against a thicknecked fuck who's been getting in fistfights with his dad since he was six years old? People have been reading way too much Ender's Game. Not every nerd can be turned into a hyperefficient killing machine (unless you're planning to give them a gun, and we know how that ends).

      Also, while there are a lot of good things about "social skills", let's not forget that a big component of that package is the ability to lie, be glib, and generally manipulate people. Read How to Win Friends and Influence People sometime -- it's a great book, but it's also two steps away from being a blueprint for manipulative sociopathy. One of the refreshing things about many mentally disabled people is how honest and forthright they are -- they say what they think, and don't try to tailor it to their audience. Sometimes "not being able to relate to people" is code for "isn't willing or able to tell the little lies that lubricate our daily social interactions".

      I'm all for developing social skills and teaching people to stand up for themselves. But the rest of us also have a responsibility to protect the vulnerable, and to crush bullies whenever we encounter them, with every means at our disposal. Blaming the victim is a chickenshit way of shirking that responsibility. If some dude is a pompous, charmless, obese nerd with zero social skills, his peers aren't obligated to like him. But no matter how annoying or unattractive he may be, as long as he minds his own business and doesn't mess with anyone, no one should mess with him. At the risk of getting too polemical (as if it's not too late for that!) -- a society that doesn't enforce "live and let live", on a personal and institutional level, is a society that endangers its own right to exist.

    39. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      When I was in 6th grade, I went to a school (early version of the "magnet school" concept) that bussed kids in from all over the city. Within a few months, I'd made a new set of friends. They weren't necessarily the kids I was in class with, or even the kids who lived closest to me. They were the kids I rode the bus with. It was a great place to socialize. It doesn't sound like that's happening on this netbus.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    40. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by bmr91 · · Score: 1

      Fuck you for perpetuating the problem and contributing nothing toward the solution.

    41. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Zero_Independent · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Spoken like a true Uncle Tom. Let me ask you something. Why the fuck should I try to relate to people with half my intelligence? Hmm? To make friends? I got friends. They're all G like me. If someone doesn't have anything interesting to say, that's their fucking problem, not mine. It's not my job to try to make myself more accessible. Maybe the rest of the world can take some advice from me instead. Stop being so fucking stupid.

    42. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks. I'd mod you up if I had the points.
      But I don't. FU, slashdot modjerks.

      I also (probably) have Asperger's. Alas, self-diagnosed. My being close to age 70, it's not worth my while to consult a psychologist.
      But you are RIGHT ON about beating children and dogs. (and cats, or ANY sentient creature)
      When my youngest child (a boy) would go into a rage, so would I.
      (Due to my lifelong depression. (It's OK, I'm on SSRIs now..And wine. LOL!)
      And I would spank the li'l bastard. Let us say that neither of us came out of this satisfied or more enlightened.
      I just hope he treats his kids (if he ever has any) better than I treated him.

      Bertrand Russel once remarked upon the old rhyme:
      "A woman, a dog and a Walnut tree -
      The more you beat them the better they be."
      Russel (100 years ago) said that he he didn't know the effects of beatings
      on Walnut trees, but it most certainly DID NOT work with women or dogs.

      Or, of course, children. Or for that matter, adult males....
      Now where were we..? ah yes- wifi on buses... Oh! geez... forgot the thread here... ;-)

      --
      - Ecsad Essemal
      The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
    43. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      Intelligence has a fairly specific definition, and it isnt' about connecting to other people. You can call people who don't care about social skills idiots, but that's a separate matter from intelligence.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    44. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you for perpetuating the perpetuation of the problem and contributing nothing toward the solution.

    45. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Kind of off-topic, but I agree that the kids being on the computer while on the bus could be a problem when they learn to drive. I'm a reader. I spent the time on the bus with my nose buried in a book. When I got my license, I was completely lost. My parents had to teach me how to get to school, because for the previous 10 years I had never watched the trip to there.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    46. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by moortak · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately in many instances violent retaliation only escalates the situation. There is no shortage of mentally unstable individuals in schools with either access to weapons or just to large groups of friends. Sure you might break his jaw in that first encounter, but it really doesn't do you much good if he shows up at the next with a knife, gun, car, or just enough friends to ensure you aren't leaving under your own power.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    47. Re:behavioral problems have virtually disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people bullied you because you were so much smarter than everyone? Stop acting like a victim. That is not how it happens.

  5. And the zombification of our children continues... by Liquidrage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like good parenting...

    Stick a TV/DS/Xbox infront of your kid and they act all perfect.

    Can't wait for the virtual elementary school. Just strap your kid to the gurney and put the goggles on 'em.

  6. sounds ominous by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know, I know. This is robably a good thing. Kids fighting on a school bus is probably not the safest thing. But on reading the article, I can't help but compare it to medicating a kid so he doesn't run around as much and so he's docile and well behaved and compliant and conforming. That's scary to me.

    1. Re:sounds ominous by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i think there was a time when the opinion was that good kids where to be seen, but not heard...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:sounds ominous by grumling · · Score: 1

      "Michael Bluth was taking his son to an interview at the prestigious Milford Academy, an institution once famous for its credo that children should be "neither seen nor heard"

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367279/

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    3. Re:sounds ominous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this "compare it to medicating a kid" talk completely overlooks the safety aspect of the situation. If you're the bus driver, your attention needs to be on the road and on traffic, not the guys in the middle of the bus trying to fight. But, it's ultimately the driver's responsibility for maintaining discipline on the bus. If they're not being a distraction to the driver (you know, the one person during the ride that literally holds these kids' lives in the palm of his hand), then it's a much safer bus. (Sure, you could hire bus monitors for EVERY BUS, but that's terribly expensive and/or cuts into the drivers' already meager pay. You have to have some way to retain bus driving employees and currently, it's with benefits - cut into their pay and you lose drivers only to replace them with cheaper people. Yes, I mean 'low quality'.)

      Second, it's not like there was much of an opportunity for education on the school bus prior to this idea. At least this gives them the *chance* to learn and explore knowledge. Whether they take that chance (instead of gaming or "social networking") is up to the kids.

    4. Re:sounds ominous by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://tinypic.com/fk5ctf.gif

      Scary indeed, and incredibly sad.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:sounds ominous by subsonic · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We'll just "distract them from the bad behavior" rather than engaging with the kids and doing the tough thing of disciplining kids who are acting bad and maybe trying to build up kids' confidence and sense of ownership of their actions and respect for their peers. That actually takes fundamental hard work and time investment. We can just throw up WAPs and shut the kids up and they learn/improve nothing.

    6. Re:sounds ominous by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      All this "compare it to medicating a kid" talk completely overlooks the safety aspect of the situation.

      Ah yes, the good old "won't somebody think of the children" argument. Tell me, exactly how many children die in schoolbus related accidents that were caused by children rough-housing in the back of the bus, and not a drunk or stoned bus driver in the past year? Now how many children have ridden on a bus in the past year?

      Now that you have those two figures, compute the likelihood of a student actually being in such an accident. Do you see why this argument is absurd now?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    7. Re:sounds ominous by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >But on reading the article, I can't help but compare it to medicating a kid so he doesn't run around as much and so he's docile and well behaved and compliant and conforming. That's scary to me.

      Yeah, heaven forbid we give people tools to help their boredom. I live in a major city and riding the bus is the most mind-numbing thing I can do. I usually play with my phone but would prefer a faster connection or a laptop. If you want to "medicate" someone, but them on a bus without a bus or a computer.

      Funny how there's this bullshit double-standard. If we put a TV on there or said "teens spend 8 hour watching The Hills" no one would be saying anything like "oh noes they is medicating our chillrenzz!!!" They would see it as normal. But give them a two-way technology like the web, then suddenly everyone is concerned. Funny how that works. If theyre not passive viewers of lowest common level drivel and commecial watchers, its suddenly a problem. I would prefer them to use the internet and have choice. Sorry grandpa, but the internet is not going away.

    8. Re:sounds ominous by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Really? Really, is this the scariest thing you can find? Heaven forbid he actually goes out and plays after his homework is done. I cant wait to have to sit on the bus next to your precious snowflake screaming and demanding instant gratification, invading everyone's space, and growing up into another self-entitled douche. I guess basic discipline is a thing of the past. On the plus side youre posting on slashdot, so the chances you will ever have kids is next to zil.

    9. Re:sounds ominous by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Demanding for instant gratification seems more along the lines of what some kid that grew up glued to electronic devices and the internet would expect. Precisely what I am opposed to.

      Nice ad hominem though.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    10. Re:sounds ominous by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Your making a false dichotomy. The choice isn't between engaging the kids and sedating them. The choice is between ignoring them in a lord of the flies situation, or giving them a tool that they can use for fun or education. No doubt, many of them will choose fun, but that is no worse than the alternative.

      We have the entire history of public education to show us that "doing the tough thing of disciplining kids who are acting bad and maybe trying to build up kids' confidence and sense of ownership of their actions and respect for their peers" is simply an option that is not even on the table for discussion.

    11. Re:sounds ominous by telomerewhythere · · Score: 1

      not too long ago, Fatal Beatings were expected from headmasters...

    12. Re:sounds ominous by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can't help but compare it to medicating a kid so he doesn't run around as much and so he's docile and well behaved and compliant and conforming. That's scary to me.

      As a former target of bullying, I can't help but think that medicating bullies would have produced superior education for everyone including the bullies. It would probably have single-handedly prevented me from living in severe depression for my school career between junior high (when I was uprooted from my social set when we moved) and the second year of high school, when I took the CHSPE and got the hell out of school. And instead of finding new ways to make people like me who were interested in learning too miserable to do so (what are you, some kind of egghead?) the bullies would have been learning. Of course, the absolute best thing would have been for them to have attentive and caring parents who would have been interested enough in them to know what they were up to and to give them the guidance they needed, but there is no particular reason why I should have suffered for their lack thereof.

      Just to be clear, I do not think medication of children for attitude adjustment is the best possible outcome, but I do think it is the most realistic outcome which would be positive for the greatest number of people. Unfortunately, it is usually not the bullies who are subjected to this kind of treatment, but the kids who don't fit in with the herd.

      Or put more simply, letting bullies walk all over would-be students leads to things worse than medication.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:sounds ominous by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      letting bullies walk all over would-be students leads to things worse than medication.

      I wholeheartedly agree with your post. Unfortunately our moral/law system is so fucked up that criticizing someone on a blog is a crime while beating up others is "character shaping". Note that I'm not from America, and we don't have that many school fights here in Slovenia, but I suppose there are bullies everywhere.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    14. Re:sounds ominous by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was bullied too. That's almost a given being a mixed-race, poor Chinese Jamaican with a facial tic, glasses, diminutive size, and a penchant for saying things without thinking of the reaction. I was hit in the ribs with a baseball bat because some kid hated that a dork like me caught a fly ball that he hit. I was thrown naked into the girls' locker room and I was the one who got in trouble for it.

      But I finished high school, went to college, then realized that those simian, cheating, dead end schoolmates of mine didn't matter.

      And why do I hate medication? It's because in this age I would be the one given the medication, not the bullies. They would medicate you too because some idiot counselor would believe it would be in your best interest. I concur that caring and attentive parents would solve many bullying cases, but it's precisely the lack of care and attention that precludes such bullies from getting medication.

    15. Re:sounds ominous by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's awful to "medicate" kids with access to pretty much all the information in the world. Terrible, terrible that they might spend their time reading and dare I say writing instead of punching each other.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:sounds ominous by ikarigullwing · · Score: 1

      That strip makes me cry, I remember Calvin and Hobbes with great fondness and to think of him denying his best friend. ;.;

  7. Embrace the power of porn... by Manip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The boys are all looking at porn, and the girls are on social networks discussing how to get their boy's attention or how to make themselves look nicer than the professional porn stars...

    In all seriousness however, in ten years I imagine that the internet will be accessible in every location and being unable to access the internet in the middle of the desert or on top of a mountain will result in some serious complaints to the phone companies.

    1. Re:Embrace the power of porn... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Boys looking at porn with a bus-full of their classmates? Girls making themselves looking nicer than professional porn stars - you think porn stars in general are beautiful? Are you sure you aren't projecting your own look at the world to everybody else? Or is this place you are living in that screwed up?

    2. Re:Embrace the power of porn... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Boys looking at porn with a bus-full of their classmates? Girls making themselves looking nicer than professional porn stars - you think porn stars in general are beautiful?

      Of course not, but the girls see that those porn stars have the attention of the boys, and they want to draw that attention so....

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    3. Re:Embrace the power of porn... by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All they have to do is make-out with each other or stick a hand in some orifice. The guys on the other hand will likely never be able to live up to their porn role-models.

    4. Re:Embrace the power of porn... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      how to make themselves look nicer than the professional porn stars

      I know that in America, everyone says that that is bad.
      But I also know, that in America, everyone thinks that that is good. :D

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Embrace the power of porn... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      you think porn stars in general are beautiful?

      I've seen beautiful people walking around the mall, on the bus, at work, in a movie, a music video, the local news and yes, even in porn.

      It is often the case that any media with a visual component tends to draw attractive people, why would you think this is any less true of the porn industry? While true that there are some unattractive porn stars, you might find other aspects of a person unattractive but personally I'm not a big fan of implants and tattoos, I've seldom seen a porn star that wasn't pretty in at least some fashion, if not downright beautiful.

  8. The WiFi on the Bus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Song:
    The WiFi on the bus goes up and down,
    up and down, up and down... /Song

  9. Meh by ascari · · Score: 5, Funny

    Over engineering if you ask me. The same result can be accomplished with a roll of duct tape. Silence is golden, duct tape is silver as the saying goes.

    1. Re:Meh by selven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or make them propel the bus using pedals with their own feet. That also keeps them busy and saves energy too.

    2. Re:Meh by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, you know, make sure that kids have to live closer to where they go to school and then make them walk to school. Even cheaper than duct tape.

    3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      180 school days / year * 2 walks (home and back) * 50 calories per walk = 18,000 calories
      18,000 calories / 250 calories per candy bar = 72 candy bars
      72 candy bars * .75 cents per candy bar = $54.00

      According to This site:

      Average fuel use per school bus per year (gallons) 1,714
      Total fuel used by all school buses per year (gallons) 822,857,143
      Cost of diesel fuel per gallon (Source: Energy Information Administration, June 26, 2009) $2.608
      Cost of gasoline per gallon (Source: Energy Information Administration, June 26, 2009) $2.642
      Cost of diesel fuel per bus per year $4,471
      Total cost of diesel fuel for all buses per year $2,146,011,429
      Annual cost of fuel per child transported by school bus $43

      It would, in fact, be cheaper (on average) to transport children via bus than to feed them candy bars to make up for the lost calories on the walk to and from school. Sure, you could probably find healthier and cheaper calorie sources, but what fun is that?

    4. Re:Meh by kent_eh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, you know, make sure that kids have to live closer to where they go to school and then make them walk to school.

      You have never lived outside of a densely populated urban area, have you?
      As a farm kid, I spent about an hour on the bus each day.
      I did ride my bike some days when it was warm enough, but 6 miles each way (2 of which were gravel road) took a lot of time away from chores, homework and sports.

      Our bus driver installed a car stereo in the bus (at his own expense) and put on the rock station to keep us quiet.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    5. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is America we're talking about. The majority of people have more than anough fat to burn off. ;)

    6. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Americans spent hundreds of dollars installing wifi and purchasing netbooks to keep their kids quiet. The Russians just used a roll of duct tape.

    7. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but more buildings are not. I'm assuming that this is in rural AZ. Say 45 kids that are a on a 3 hour loop out from town. Not everyone wants to live in a population center. I guess the other option would to be "everyone farther than X from the school needs to arenge their own transportation to school." That would leave alot of the poorer families without education, but that seems to be the "american way" as of late.

    8. Re:Meh by noidentity · · Score: 1

      obligatory: Silence is golden.

    9. Re:Meh by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Bah, if schools took their babysitting responsibilities seriously, they'd run from 9 to 5 with activities before and after so that the working parents could drop their kids off at the daycare on the way to work and pick them up on the way back.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    10. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in a large city, and I had an hour buss ride each way.

    11. Re:Meh by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Yah but then you have all these expensive facilities to maintain.

      I say we give each neighborhood a conch shell and a dead pig's head on a stick and let them go at it.

    12. Re:Meh by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You really think putting schools, for all age groups, every two miles or so is cheap? Cheaper than a bus system, especially? Walking a mile to school isn't that big a deal for most kids (special needs aside) and indeed I did so from about 2nd grade to 6th (walking with others until 4th grade; but the suburbs were pretty safe). It took 20-30 minutes, depending on the length of my legs (or my sister's, when she started).

      There *were* no junior high schools within a mile of my location though, and the closest one - at just over two miles, including crossing major streets and skirting a construction zone - was not a good area. The neighborhood wasn't all that bad - you could get around the worst parts with no more than an additional 5 minutes walking - but the school itself was terrible (heavy drug use, frequent violence, very poor academic record, and a low college acceptance rate). If it had been a good school, I might have walked anyhow; about 40 minutes on foot, perhaps 15 by bike (mostly uphill in the morning). The next closest option was a good school but at least an hour's walk away though, so I rode the bus there.

      The nearest high school would have been an hour or more, and it started so early that I'd have been making the entire morning walk in the darkness during winter. The next closest was just as far in a different direction. Now, maybe in some areas you have schools much closer than that, but overall I find your suggestion a bit unreasonable. We lived in fairly high-density suburbs, with a *lot* of school-age children in the area, and it was no coincidence that my parents bought a house so close to the local schools. We could have been much further (when you're a kid on foot, an extra 3 or 4 miles each way is a *lot*) or in a much more dangerous area.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    13. Re:Meh by houghi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You complain about 6 miles on a bike to school? (Just under 10KM). That is about 30-45 minutes of biking and you call that a lot? (If you go for speed, it could be as little as 15-20 minutes if you are well trained)

      And you complain about it taking away time for chores, homework and sports? Say that the bus drive took 15 minutes (including you to be ready and waiting for it) you would have saved 1 hour per day that you could be at least in part spend with friends. And with the exercise, it takes away the need for sport.

      I went to school by bike often, even though my parents did not allow it. One hour in the morning and one hour in the evening back. half of it riding with a group of friends. So not only was I working on my physical skills, I was also working on my social skills.

      And the nice thing was that if I did not go directly from school to home, I already had my transport with me. We could stop along the way home and do whatever we wanted to do. I must have been around 11-12 I think.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Meh by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      Bus routes are seldom straight. In my small town, it regularly took 30-40 minutes to get to school on the bus. The buses did their pickups in pretty much the same order as the dropoffs, so if you had a short ride at one oend of the day, you had a long ride at the other end.

      This for 2 miles to school.

      By Grade 4, I was walking home most evenings.
      By grade 9, I was a nerd, and a fellow nerd and I walked to school (2.5 miles) to avoid the rowdy crowd on the bus.
      If the streets were dry, we'd bike, which was much FASTER than the bus.

      As to bike speeds. Even as an over 50 year old, the 16 km (10 miles) to work at my last job, half on gravel roads, on a cheap mountain bike averaged about 50 minutes each way. As a kid, my power/mass ratio was a lot better.

      If I had kids, I'd encourage them to walk or bike whenever the weather was reasonable. Sure there's a chance that they will get picked up and abused. But there is a near certainty of them becoming flabby, unadventurous blobs if they don't.

      (Gross over simplification, I know.)

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    15. Re:Meh by socceroos · · Score: 1

      except, in reality it was only two blocks away.

  10. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by miggyb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right, because before putting wifi on the bus, there were so many opportunities for learning and self-achievement

    If anything, making people shut the fuck up in the bus will help the introspective types that just want to be left alone so they can get some reading done. From personal experience, the most distracting thing about reading in the bus was not trying to read through the bumpiness and the constant starting and stopping. No, the most distracting thing was the guy next to me trying to get into a fight with the dude directly in front of me, reducing my personal space to whatever my eye's shortest focal length could be.

    --
    This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
  11. Had nothing to do with the Ritalin? by syousef · · Score: 1

    I don't know about this. I'd assume that if kids were behaving so wildly Internet access wouldn't help the situation. Kids would just beat each other up for mobile devices, surf for porn etc. Personally I think they've found a way to emit Ritalin waves via the wireless transmitter. Now please excuse me, I'm late to an appointment with the drycleaner. My tinfoil hat was getting rather dirty.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  12. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the most insightful parent and grandparent I have ever had the pleasure of having.

  13. With leather? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

    It looks just like a telefunken U47.

    Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!

    You'll love it.
    It's a way of life!

    --
    One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    1. Re:With leather? by Raseri · · Score: 1

      A Zappa reference on Slashdot? You are my new hero.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
  14. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

    ust like good parenting...

    Stick a TV/DS/Xbox infront of your kid and they act all perfect.

    Can't wait for the virtual elementary school. Just strap your kid to the gurney and put the goggles on 'em.

    So what exactly should the bus driver be doing? Isn't better if he can concentrate on driving the bus instead of disciplining kids?

  15. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't that be googles ?

  16. Benefit of Online Social Networking by gregux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The kids never actually have to interact with one another. Problem solved.

    --
    The three most important words in a relationship are "I love you." The two most important are "Humor me."
    1. Re:Benefit of Online Social Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign me up!

    2. Re:Benefit of Online Social Networking by khchung · · Score: 1

      You have a very narrow definition of "interaction".

      I am replying to your post, is this not "interaction"?

      If I write a letter to my friend, is that not "interaction"?
      If I write a email to my friend, is that not "interaction"?
      If I chat on the phone with my friend, is that not "interaction"?
      If I chat on ICQ with my friend, is that not "interaction"?
      If I text with my friend and his replied similarly, is that not "interaction"?
      If I comment on the FB status of my friend, and later he replied to my comment, is that not "interaction"?

      Or does "interaction" only happens when one kids punches another in his face? Spare me that kind "interaction", thank you.

      --
      Oliver.
  17. Being the one usually getting hit. by maillemaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since I was the one usually getting hit, frankly I dont' wouldn't care what they are were hunched down on as long as it isn't me.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  18. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by cptdondo · · Score: 1

    Well, reading is "distracting" and "entertaining". My kids use their computers to play games, sure. Listen to obnoxious music, sure. But they also study the videos of their swims, (they're competitive swimmers), do homework, write poetry and stories, and such. (I'm sure they're going to be Nobel-winning authors. NOT. But they have fun with it.)

    This just takes it up to the next level. I hated riding the bus; I'd rather take the subway. Too many kids being assholes on the bus.

    I think all in all this is good. The bus driver has to drive, not be a nanny. The more attention s/he can pay to driving and not to screaming fighting kids, the safer everyone is.

    And, best of all, listen to the kids. They like it, although no doubt they didn't quote the disaffected ones.

  19. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds great! Growing up in a mixed suburban / rural environment, I had to endure an hour-long bus ride each way every day for the first three years of high school until, finally, the county added a second high school 15 minutes from my house in my senior year. Of course, by this point, I had gotten my first car, so I no longer had to ride the bus anyway. I spent those hour-long bus rides the first 3 years of HS sleeping with my walkman on- it sure beat staying awake from 6-7am every morning riding on the bus. I can only imagine what fun I might have had with a system like this in place - not that I would necessarily use it for educational purposes, but it sure would have helped to fill that long, boring ride with something more productive than sleep.

  20. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or the idiot parents that get the DVD player in the minivan. That one blows my mind. "Going to the store kids! pick out a movie for the 5 minute ride!"

    wow..... just wow....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. $200 router, $720/year for service by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a time when school budgets are being slashed, this is pretty expensive. You put this on 50 buses and you've just lost a teacher.

    That's really about the only thing which would make me dislike the service. Buses are notoriously rowdy places, and hotbeds for bullying. If you have a long bus ride, it probably could function as a partial study hall - especially with the filtering that most public schools put in place. Even if the kids are just pulling up online magazines to read, or chatting with friends, it's not that bad - their gainfully occupied and relatively quiet.

    A bunch of posters seem to think that a bus should be rowdy. Why? Is the bus driver not normally distracted enough? And what, exactly, is "normal" or "free" about sticking 30 kids in an enclosed space for 45 minutes twice a day with nothing to do? It sucks. Might as well give them something to do that doesn't involve carrying (yet more) books to read on the way, or give them an option other that talking/arguing with the 6 other kids that happen to sit near them.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > A bunch of posters seem to think that a bus should be rowdy.

      The school busses I rode weren't rowdy. But then, that was fifty years ago...

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by longhunt · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it takes them to hit the 5GB/month data limit, with 45 kids watching video.

      A day?

      An hour?

    3. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I didn't see that the total was capped.

      Even if it is, they'll never hit the cap depending on the speeds they're getting. If they're getting EVDO-0/EDGE speeds in the 100-200kb/second range, and the buses run the typical 18-19 days per month for 2.5 hours, you've got between 2.0 and 5.0 GB total d/l available at 100%. If they're getting real 3G (as opposed to Verizon's EVDO-A) then it could be in the 1-2Mb range - but if you've got a 70 mile bus trip, I'm guessing that you're so far out in the sticks that you'll be lucky to get that kind of coverage.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30? Try 60 kids, cars that don't really care that you are carrying their neighbor's kids, narrow two-lane roads with no shoulder and most cars that see you coming will pull out in front of you in an instant because they don't want to get stuck behind the school bus for the 450 feet they'll be on this road forcing me to slow down for them not once, but twice.

      On top of that I'm watching for fights, couples getting too friendly and then actually moving the bus down the road safely, because the first time I don't, the phone lines will be lit up.

    5. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Some school buses in California have fees associated with them (with reduced/free discounts similar to lunches), but there are generally no free rides in those districts. I'm not sure about AZ (and given that the example is a wide and rural route I doubt it), but one idea is to charge a bit more to subsidize the wifi. I know kids that spend over an hour each way on the bus that their parents already pay for, maybe a bit more for wireless would be an attractive option.

    6. Re:$200 router, $720/year for service by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it will cost a teacher - though I think more likely you'll lose something optional - like a librarian. But 50 busses * 30 kids * 2 hour long trips a day is 3000 hours of benefit every day. The librarian would no doubt have benefitted a few kids far more, but I'd be that on average this is better.

      I have a hard time imagining how a school could get a similar amount of benefit for $800/year.

  22. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Kjella · · Score: 1

    There's not one minute of my childhood I wished I'd be crammed in a bus being forced to sit still and shut up because it builds character and patience.

    Life is short. Wasting away your life because you think you have so much of it is one of the worst things you can do. /says the guy posting on slashdot.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  23. wifi imply loaded bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great roberry target

    1. Re:wifi imply loaded bus by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Usually gadget theft is by persons that know each other. I don't think a bus - which is a bit of a controlled and certainly closed environment - is a great place for theft.

      As trying to attack the bus itself, I can't image too many people stooping that low. And even if they would, imagine the consequences when you get caught or convicted of a crime like that. Society is very protective of its children.

      The biggest threat is probably from local (kids) gangs and bullies when walking from the bus to the home.

  24. mental and social development by arikol · · Score: 1

    mental and social development is more that just studying.
    Boys and girls use different methods to increase their social competence and one important element is their little fighting, shouting and jumping. The girls should also make noise and difficult towards each other. This is necessary. Educators should know this. Well, good educators, anyway.

    And kids should not be studying on the bus at all. This attitude of "more TIME spent studying = better" needs to go the way of the Dodo. Socializing is probably even MORE important. And I know most of /. probably got beaten up on the school bus, but that was also a part of finding our social circle and knowing how to behave around jocks and other idiots. Part of the reason that you are an alpha geek is that you figured out that you don't have anything in common with those half-simian mooks on the school bus..

    But seriously. BAD idea.

    1. Re:mental and social development by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you get your studying done on the bus, where you're trapped and basically can't do anything about it, your time is yours as soon as you get home, which almost anybody would prefer. I did homework at home maybe one night a week when I was in high school, mainly because I got it done while I was still at school. Same idea - it's a study hall.

      Of course, I never rode a bus...

    2. Re:mental and social development by selven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The internet is more than just studying. You can take a Wikipedia link hopping trip and see what you learn, you can read the news, you can read and post on Slashdot, and you can go on Facebook/Myspace/Twitter/email. Notice how the first three are educational but without relating to your school subjects and the last two are in fact forms of socializing.

    3. Re:mental and social development by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > mental and social development is more that just studying.

      Yes. It involves engaging in social and physical activity (including real productive work) in mixed groups of children and adults.

      Too bad most children never get that. Instead they get public school and television.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:mental and social development by argent · · Score: 1

      And I know most of /. probably got beaten up on the school bus, but that was also a part of finding our social circle and knowing how to behave around jocks and other idiots.

      And part of that was jocks learning how to behave around normal people. I've had bosses who were jocks. Did they beat me up? No, they asked me for advice, 'cos that's what they were paying me for. One of the ways they learned that was by being around people who were actually doing geek stuff when they didn't have to.

      Learning that you don't have to be a rowdy yobbo to have fun is useful. Who knows, maybe some of them will actually discover that it's handy to have a few geeks in their social circle earlier in life.

    5. Re:mental and social development by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      And that sums up the state of our public education nicely.

    6. Re:mental and social development by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      They're not being forced to use it. If they'd prefer to socialize (in person) they're free to do so. But if you don't want to socialize with the idiots on your bus, you don't have to. Instead, you could IM with your actual friend on a different bus.

      I don't know why you're complaining...seems like you'd appreciate the fact that more time spent studying = more time those damn kids aren't on your lawn.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  25. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

    well, you gotta remember these are long-ass bus trips we're talking about. more than an hour each way. conversation with the kid next to you only goes so far, and i'm sure at least some of the kids appreciate the chance to work on some homework.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  26. They're being poisoned by the WiFi by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Geez. Everyone knows that all signals cause cancer or enable the government to control our minds!

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  27. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "This is just so typical. Let's not teach children to behave, have patience. imagination, read books, or anything else. Let's just DISTRACT/ENTERTAIN them."

    If the choice is between being a bullying beast and a zombie, zombify the little fuckers so they leave the smart kids alone!
    BTW stop pretending that "teaching" them to behave is a fucking option without the ability to IMPOSE discipline which is what builds SELF discipline!

    Getting them to sit down and shut up is a great accomplishment, and the smart kids can use the net access to their benefit.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pretty much depend on what they are doing while there, what you consider "education", and how much you consider education what they would be doing if that werent implemented. In any case, the main difference between internet and the things that parents put them at home, is that tv is not even interactive, and games are usually alone, no interaction with others.

    Anyway, if they are so plugged at the bus, then at home they wouldnt be tv/ds/xbox, but pretty much at what they are doing at the bus.

    BTW, i live in Uruguay, where most school children have an XO (and few days i read that they plan to give them to even younger kids), and there seem to be a trend to be quieter and plugged to them for some children at least. I hope that that kind of education don't have a clear negative effect (if it will be the end of childhood, please that be the A.C.Clarke version)

  29. New? by ockancc1701 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So what is novel about this, the WiFi on the bus, or the fact that it is a school bus? Internet access is getting more and more widespread, this was only a matter of time. http://www.oxfordtube.com/wifi.html I used WiFi on a bus to Oxford two years ago.

  30. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    They are learning to run a virtual farm on facebook.

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  31. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can think of a vast number of trips in the car that I experienced as a child that would have been improved a million-fold by the presence of a movie. Driving is usually boring. I did a lot of reading on trips, but that was trouble on long trips - I wouldn't always finish the book when we were near a major metro area.

    Most things that kids get dragged along to are things that the adults really don't want the kids around for - like grocery runs - but that would be too expensive to hire a babysitter for every time you wanted to do them. Couple that with increased expectations of supervision by the authorities (see here; Illinois requires supervision at all times for all kids under 14, and the site and several states' CPS suggest that children should be 12 before they're ever left alone), and you've got kids spending a lot more time in the car than thirty years ago. I was left home alone by 7 or 8 for short trips, by 10 for several-hour blocks, and by 12 I was babysitting my sister all day during the summer. I also walked home from school, about a mile, from third grade on. (If the weather was nice, I'd ride my bike both ways, but I liked to sleep late too much to wake up early enough to walk there.)

  32. Not in Asia by jginspace · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just took a trip to Penang. Wifi buses are widespread there - perhaps 1 in every 5 that pulled up. I just wonder when bystanders will start staging 'accidents' so they can finish their surfing ...

    1. Re:Not in Asia by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      1 in 5 is widespread? We have a better ratio than that in Seattle.

  33. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

    Adopt the restraint technique used for Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs: Face mask, straight jacket, and tied to a hand cart for easy mobility.

    Parent: How was school today?
    Child: mmrrmmph...
    Parent: Awww, isn't that special.

  34. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right, because before putting wifi on the bus, there were so many opportunities for learning and self-achievement

    Actually, you're right. They're missing the mark on the public school mission, and what public schools are best at: socialization.

    Really, there's no better argument for mass public schools: get along with those around you and you'll be a good adult, or some such shit. The education is shit, so nothing to remark about as a positive there.

    So, truly: the wifi is detracting from the Mission Statement. Someone will probably have to get rid of it.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  35. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    Serious question: How many kids have you raised?

  36. Been done before by barberousse · · Score: 2, Informative

    I occasionally take the Montreal-Magog bus in Quebec. This is a 90 minutes ride, mostly highway. Still, the bus has access to the Internet through free wifi. It's especially good considering most of the ride is through rural areas.

  37. WiFi on busses, trains, etc. by zoom-ping · · Score: 1

    Most Estonian railroad and bus companies have had WiFi on them for years using Kõu (thunder). Loving it.

  38. It's good and bad. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    This is a good thing in the sense that it gives students an opportunity to be more productive during a time that they normally wouldn't be. However, being rowdy and stupid on the school bus is part of being a high-schooler. Kids at that age should be loud and crazy, simply because they won't get the opportunity to do that elsewhere or when they age. Sure, some people might get the short end of the stick (I did when I was in HS and middle school, though I almost always walked to school), but I always thought it was part of growing up.

    While I don't regret the way my high school years panned out, some social issues I'm facing now would have certainly been made easier to deal with had I relaxed a little back then. Being quiet and structured all the time has its flaws.

    1. Re:It's good and bad. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Kids at that age should be loud and crazy, simply because they won't get the opportunity to do that elsewhere or when they age

      That's an interesting assertion.

      Got any proof?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  39. New Policy Needed by b4upoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It is an outrage that students get stuck on school buses for hundreds of hours each year. We need laws that assign students to the closest school available and also laws that requite counties to build schools that serve every area as best as can be done. I am aware that Texas sprawls quite a bit and Arizona surely has similar problems. But we see students in highly urban areas who still are on busses for three hours a day.

    1. Re: New Policy Needed by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      A: This solution will get us there.

      Q: What is "Separate But Equal" Alex?

  40. billy madison by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    O'Doel RULES!

  41. From free-WiFi-all-over-the-place courtry. by zoom-ping · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most Estonian railway and bus companies have been offering free WiFi via Kõu (thunder) on longer rides for some years now. Loving it.

  42. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by slugstone · · Score: 0

    This is a school bus ride. No teacher involved. You can ride the bus to help the school bus driver with the kids.

  43. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Ritchie70 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I followed your link, then another link, and found the Illinois law actually says:

    Illinois law defines a neglected minor, in part, as "any minor under the age of 14 years whose parent or other person responsible for the minor's welfare leaves the minor without supervision for an unreasonable period of time without regard for the mental or physical health, safety or welfare of that minor."

    So based on that little snippet, it says "an unreasonable period of time" and "without regard for their safety."

    And that pretty much leaves it to the judge unless those terms are defined.

    I don't think it's unreasonable to leave a 12 year old alone for 3 or 4 hours after school if it's a responsible kid.

    I do think it's unreasonable to leave him alone for 3 or 4 days.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  44. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot possibly be a parent. The Wii, DS2, PS2 and any other gaming system we have had in this house has caused nothing but infighting and sabotage.

  45. Why Take Laptops to School? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 0, Troll

    I graduated from college in the winter of 2006. With the exception of the computer science department, very few college students needed personal laptops at school.
    Why should primary or secondary school students lug laptops from home to school and back when most schools have controlled computer labs and most towns have public libraries? The complexity and cost of distributing and maintaining laptops seems unnecessary.
    Laptops and per-bus wifi seem like an expensive way to lessen the dullness of trips to and from school.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:Why Take Laptops to School? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      I graduated at around the same time you did, but I'm going to say I've noticed things have changed. You didn't need a laptop in 2006, because there were large computer labs and less homework needed computers. Now, with more courses having online components, and with schools slashing their computer lab budgets (my college has less computers now than there were in 2006), you need a laptop just to get anything done outside of home. And, counter-strike is very useful for passing the time in large gen-ed classes with mandatory attendance yet little substance.

    2. Re:Why Take Laptops to School? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Go back and audit some classes, I disagree completely. In '05 plenty of people had laptops in classes and my visits show that it's become even more dominant. Many people I know carried laptops with them if only to use in between classes or later in the library. Now a bunch of them have netbooks. Update your Facebook while having a pint or take some notes during a lecture or fine tune a paper minutes before it is due. Perhaps it depends on the university, discipline aside maybe different universities have different adoption rates.

    3. Re:Why Take Laptops to School? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that laptops are nice for working when labs are unavailable in college; This article, however, is about school buses for primary/secondary students.
      In order for the bus wifi to be cost-effective it must be utilized; for that to happen, the schools must either provide laptops or encourage students to bring laptops.
      Way back in the stupid ages when I was in high school, the school's policy discouraged bringing expensive/fancy gadgets - they're neither helpful in classes with curricula that assume students bring pens and paper nor secure in halls full of mischievous students.

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    4. Re:Why Take Laptops to School? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      When did you last audit a primary or secondary school class?
      The topic at hand is using technology funding for wifi on buses as part of compulsory education.

      If the bus-based wifi is not limited in such a way that it can only be used for schoolwork, why should the school's budget pay for it?

      Assume it is limited, proxied, etc. so that students don't just surf for porn and update Facebook.
      If the schools pay for mobile wifi subscriptions, then they may have to provide laptops as well to ensure each student has an equal opportunity to make use of the technology.
      Those laptops should provide enough reference material (eBooks, cached wikipedia, etc.) to be useful while disconnected from networks, so even with cheap hardware they may require a fair deal of licensed material.
      Providing wifi on buses is a slippery slope toward using costly technology in places where it has never been needed before.
      That seems like a big investment to reduce the frequency of hair pulling and yelling among kids of an age where such bad behaviors are normal.

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  46. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by noidentity · · Score: 1

    If anything, making people shut the fuck up in the bus will help the introspective types that just want to be left alone so they can get some reading done.

    Indeed, even Mike Tyson agrees.

  47. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what exactly should the bus driver be doing? Isn't better if he can concentrate on driving the bus instead of disciplining kids?

    Isn't it obvious? He should just drive the bus and ignore the whole Lord of the Flies re-enactment going on in the back.

  48. Bad Idea by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    Some say your school years are the best years of your life, but that's really looking through rose tinted glasses. There's bullying, isolation, social discomfit, inferiority complexes, and all manner of other things. There are good things too, and for most of us it's the friends we make at school.

    I agree with the general consensus, those kids aren't studying up for the next exam - they're on Facebook / Twitter / Myspace or downloading pr0n. Now, what they should be doing instead of placing a bloody great big laptop shaped barrier between themselves and the other kids is SOCIALISING with the group of people that will most likely be their friends from here till death. Who are your friends in middle age? It's your school chums and work mates for many. Any new barrier between them and you is a potential lifelong loss of friendship.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to Facebook to see what my old school friends and previous work mates are chatting about today.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    1. Re:Bad Idea by socsoc · · Score: 1

      If one experiences bullying, isolation, social discomfit and inferiority complexes, these people won't be your lifelong friends. You'll thank the day you leave and build real friendships.

      Some would say it was the worst years of a life (socially) till you arrived at a university.

  49. MOD PARENT UP by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A bullying victim can't have a cop or a teacher or a parent standing over them, protecting them all the time. The only people who are always present when bullying occurs are the perp and the victim. The only person who is always available and able to convince the perp that bullying is a bad idea is the victim.

    Refuse to be a victim.

    Specific instructions as to how to do that would only open this post to criticism based on unimportant details, so I'm not going there. Let the principle stand: You, the victim, can break the cycle of abuse. It's absolutely heartbreaking that so many kids don't figure this out before they're 40 years old.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Specific instructions as to how to do that would only open this post to criticism based on unimportant details, so I'm not going there. Let the principle stand: You, the victim, can break the cycle of abuse. It's absolutely heartbreaking that so many kids don't figure this out before they're 40 years old.

      Or just read Ender's Game. Stand up to bullies, put 'em six feet under, destroy planets. All in a day's work for Ender Wiggin.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  50. This just in! by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 1

    Young adults, when given internet, will use it!

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    1. Re:This just in! by ivi · · Score: 1

      So, they ARE smarter than older adults, after all, ie, if they're doing more than report on last night's big date's moves & responses... :-/

      Why the H#LL aren't more of us using Internet, eg, to find & join (or invest in) innovative projects to help solve Global Warming / Climate Change?!?

  51. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    You know, it's times like these that I wish I had a sockpuppet account just so I could mod up an insightful commentary on my post.

  52. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by subsonic · · Score: 1

    Its not about "shutting the fuck up" or even being introspective (which one should be able to do without a computer/mobile device in their hands). Its about being able to handle yourself without some sort of on demand self-determined audio/visual stimulation.

    I am genuinely concerned that kids are living in a world where they are almost always able to distance themselves from the here and now. They are not as empathic, not inclined to listen or engage in, or with, the unfamiliar when its not self-directed. Not that kids aren't 'bored enough' but its being able to genuinely think and act creatively in an otherwise blank slate of time that kids are missing out on. /plus I like to think, "what happens when the bombs fall and we don't have technology to coddle us every single second of our lives?" Power outages become truly devastating when kids are emotionally tethered to their devices.

  53. As Al Gore Would Say... by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Funny

    This bus is on the information superhighway!

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  54. The three screens. by irright · · Score: 1

    Now THAT'S the opiate of the masses.

  55. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Something like what the old man went through in Soylent Green might be nice!

  56. Real Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I took away from the story was that a school board wanted to make their students more docile, so they attached a device that emits EMR to a school bus, and suddenly, the children became calm. I better start making a child sized tin foil hat for my kids.

  57. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    They are using wifi as a distraction to modify behavior. These are kids. They should be able to behave without a electronic distraction. Yes, kids can be mean. Kids can bully. The solution is not to give those causing problems a shiny object to distract them. The solution is to actually teach kids to be responsible.

    This isn't an either/or situation where the kids will misbehave or have wifi. It's using wifi instead of correcting the underlying issue. Kids can be taught to behave. But here is another situation with electronics are parenting, not the parents. There was a time where a kid misbehaving was reported to the parent and the situation was corrected except in the most drastic of situations that usually was medical at its root.

    But now we give them wifi.

    Disclaimer. I am a parent. I used to ride the bus to school.

  58. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they live an hour outside of town you presumptuous prick.

  59. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by cheesewire · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for the virtual elementary school. Just strap your kid to the gurney and put the goggles on 'em.

    Unfortunately this situation seems to exist in the form of poorly trained teachers, for whom science education is limited to videos on the interactive whiteboard.

  60. Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    While good advice for the individual, it doesn't fix the bigger problem of the bully moving on to bully someone else, as well as the bully often being an unhappy person for various reasons (like bullied in their past). There is a lot to be said for well functioning communities too. Example of advice for the community:
        http://www.beyondbullying.com/whatyoucando.html
    """
    You can help to stop bullying in your school. Check your own behaviour. Refuse to be involved in any bullying situation.
      Do not allow someone to be deliberately left out of a group.
      Encourage a bullied pupil to join in with your activities or groups.
    How To Challenge Bullying Behaviour
    If You See Someone Being Bullied:
    Do not smile or laugh.
    Tell a member of staff what is happening.
    If you can, tell the bully to stop what they are doing.
    If you can, show the bully that you disapprove of his or her actions.
    If you do nothing when you see bullying, you may be allowing it to happen, or even encouraging it
    """

    This biggest problem with school bullying is that compulsory schools themselves are usually bullies and demonstrate that all the time by the authoritarian environment. So, you get a lot of what the school intentionally or not teaches.
        http://www.newciv.org/whole/schoolteacher.txt

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      That's going to accomplish all of fuck all in the way of stopping any bullying. You want to stop a bully from picking on you then you beat the snot out of him enough times until he and all his cohorts leave you alone.

      You want to stop him from being a bully you wait until he picks someone else and then you do it again and tell him to leave EVERYONE the hell alone or you'll be back.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      peer pressure is the answer and if the animals we pretend are young adults are all honing their skills on facebook being sociable and unsociable in an indirect way then its a good replacement for our Darwinian monkey learning school of biting kicking and scratching - abstraction is the key.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    3. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      You have a point in protecting others from additional bullying as the next victim. Still, what do you do if the bully is two years older than you, outweighs you by fifty pounds, is trained in some combat skill (martial arts, wrestling, etc.), might be packing a weapon, and is popular with his/her cohort?

      Also, many social situations have an element of ambiguity; what if things then become a cycle of feuds and violence, perhaps escalating in various ways?

      Some bullies are also often excellent at playing a role in a social hierarchy and making themselves look like the victim, so the consequences of trying to go one-on-one may actually just make you more the victim in some situtaions. Also, you are assuming physical violence, what about verbal assault, especially the kind of stuff that goes on with the toxic girl culture?

      Community is more of an answer that works in more situations. There are other solutions to conflicts than either violence or threats of it. See, for example, ideas about mutual security:
          http://www.beyondintractability.org/audio/morton_deutsch/?nid=2430

      Lots more ideas:
          http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=solutions+to+bullying

      Still, another aspect of the bullying problem is that the normal behavior for people being bullied might be to avoid the bully; but compulsory schooling makes that impossible, and bullies take advantage of that, whether in a classroom, in a school yard, or on a bus. And as I said, compulsory schooling is bullying at its core as well (derived from Prussia),
          http://www.the-open-boat.com/Gatto.html
      and almost every teacher standing up in front of a class is essentially setting an example of how to use authority to bully. Bullying is essentially another negative externality of compulsory schooling. John Taylor Gatto, NYS Teacher of the year, goes so far as to say in his writings that the schools become co-dependent on bullies and other violent students to keep the status quo going by keeping children living in fear in various ways.
          http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2009/tle513-20090405-03.html
      """
      School order came to depend upon maintaining good relations with the toughest bullies, covertly affirming their right to prey upon whiners and cry-babies (though never cry-babies from politically potent families). The intellectual dimension was removed from almost all classrooms as a matter of unwritten policy, and since test scores are independent of intellect, those teachers who tried to hold onto mental development as a goal, rather than rote memorization, actually penalized their students and themselves where test scores were the standard of accomplishment.
      """

      Bullying may happen in other compulsory settings tool, like the typical workplace, but here are some ideas about that too: :-)
          http://www.whywork.org/rethinking/whywork/abolition.html

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    4. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      If kids are animals in that sense, why are so many homeschoolers at the same age so well behaved? No group is perfect, of course, just an alternative thing to consider that the environment may be causing a lot of behavior problems.

      Other aspects of the solution, as a care package of healing-related links. :-)
          "Treating Disease With Vitamin D" (anyone like a school child spending most of their time indoors is at risk)
              http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/treatment.shtml
          "Surviving America's Depression Epidemic: How to Find Morale, Energy, and
      Community in a World Gone Crazy"
            http://books.google.com/books?id=bCuC2H-6k_8C
          "Dark Nights of the Soul: A Guide to Finding Your Way Through Life's Ordeals"
              http://books.google.com/books?id=RKZreNYKNHQC
          "Albert Einstein on: Religion and Science"
              http://www.sacred-texts.com/aor/einstein/einsci.htm
          "A wombat talks about a global mindshift"
              http://www.global-mindshift.org/memes/wombat.swf
          "The Orchid Child"
          http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200912/dobbs-orchid-gene

      From the last: "Most of us have genes that make us as hardy as dandelions: able to take root and survive almost anywhere. A few of us, however, are more like the orchid: fragile and fickle, but capable of blooming spectacularly if given greenhouse care. So holds a provocative new theory of genetics, which asserts that the very genes that give us the most trouble as a species, causing behaviors that are self-destructive and antisocial, also underlie humankind’s phenomenal adaptability and evolutionary success. With a bad environment and poor parenting, orchid children can end up depressed, drug-addicted, or in jail—but with the right environment and good parenting, they can grow up to be society’s most creative, successful, and happy people."

      Bullying will always be with us, but we can reduce it by having a better society with happier and more fulfilled individuals. Wi-Fi on school buses empowering children to do self-directed learning using networked computers is a big step forward in many ways, even if there are downsides as well (vitamin D deficiency from not walking outdoors, obesity from sedentary behavior, some media content is candy or even toxic, and it displaces other good things like face-to-face interaction, relationships with nature, hands-on hobbies, helping others physically, and so on).

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    5. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Still isn't perfect. Simply humiliating the wrong bully is enough to get shot over, which happened in my middle school back in '92. Actually putting a beat down on the bully might just cement his need to reassert his street cred. Even if you don't get shot, I lost count how many times I would stand up for myself, only to get jumped by gangs of kids.

      Everything is nice and simple when it is just one bully, but they (at least in my experience) seem to form tribes of assholes who will happily sucker punch you from behind and lend a hand to the bully in distress. When their are 50 people on your school bus, and 20 of them are in the same gang, their is very little you can do short of carrying a lead pipe in your bag. They made my life hell at school and even worse around my neighborhood. They made it well know that they had several guns in their circle, and would chase people down just to beat on them for the lulz.

      It got so bad that my father decided he had to intervene (this is long after getting the police involved, due to how often I would come home with my face busted up and bloody, mind you I was 12 at the time) he got in his truck with me with an eye swollen shut, bleeding from my mouth, nose and cuts all over the front of my shirt joining him, and we drove around looking for the head of this gang. We found him walking down the street in front of his house, so he drove him down into his grass yard, got out of the truck and pinned him to the wall of the house. He then explained that if anything further happened to me, that he would be back in the middle of the night and would screw all the windows and doors shut and would burn their house down with them in it, if it did not end. I expected this wouldn't change anything, I figured me being in the truck watching all this would just make my life that much worse the next day, or that they would directly retaliate against my family, but they stopped messing with me after that.

      I never wanted my dad to win my fights, and I'm not sure how well this would have gone down in the slightly more sue happy atmosphere of today, but I was thankful. The police, the school administrators, and myself getting in numerous fights where at times I would viciously defend myself were never enough to dissuade this persistent group of hell spawn. Just sharing my anecdote, as not everyone is able to make the bullying stop just by fighting back. The harder I fought back, the harder they made my life.

    6. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have a bully. He used to threaten to rape me (I'm a guy). He tried to beat me up a few times, and failed every time. Every time, I'd tell him, "I'll be waiting, Jorge". You see, I was a fat kid, but I also happened to do a lot of exercise (like running 30 miles a week as a soccer midfielder, lots of flexibility and strength training for soccer goal keeping) and had a lot more muscle than most kids my age, at 14 or so. He jumped me while I was next to a fence. Jorge thought he could take me. Until I told him he punched like a bitch, and grabbed him by the arms, turned us both around (basically by picking him up), threw him into the fence so he fell, and proceeded to wallop him in the face repeatedly.

      He tried it again, with a baseball in his hand this time. I ended up blocking his swinging fist while nearly simultaneously taking a leaping kick to his lower leg (so I jumped and turned my hips, as if I was kicking a soccer ball 70 yards). I kicked him hard enough that his feet came off the ground. Both of them. Of course, with him on his back, I proceeded to wallop him in the face repeatedly.

      Eventually, he got the message. We would occasionally play gym soccer together. Most of the baseball players were dicks, for no reason. The other half of the boys in the class made up the soccer playing clique. We introduced the sport to each other, because we were willing to be accepting. The baseball players were pretty competitive and we played a rough game (a virtue in my book), but I always hit back if they crossed the line from "fair, rough" play to doing something nasty. Tit. For. Tat. That's the ethical way to deal with a bully. (But what do you do if the bully is a parent?)

      So here's the moral: bullies will bully anybody they think they can get away with bullying. It's clearly an evolutionary strategy. Here's another one: if you get fit enough, bullies won't fuck with you. This works as a kid, since kids are relatively stupid and won't figure out that fitness means fighting strength. Adults are a different matter. Hopefully lots of bullies end up meeting guys who don't take shit, and learn to tone it down. But if they learn to be successful fighters, they grow into nasty pieces of work, to be dealt with either through the threat of gun violence or groups of friendly adults willing to help put him in a position where his face can be walloped until he gets it.

      If you want to really confuse a bully, try escalating an issue beyond all reason. Become mindlessly violent over a minor, but clear and direct, insult. They shit their pants sometimes.

    7. Re:Fixing a problem for a person or a community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The culture of public schools is very similar in most ways to prison culture. Social hierarchies and cliques are the predominant way of negotiating interaction, and showing that you're capable of rejecting an outsider or proving dominance automatically propels you upwards. There is a lot of unaddressed anger at unnecessarily unpleasant aspects of the organization, participation is compulsory, and there are little to no consequences for violence or directed hatred. The attacker stands a reasonably good chance of advancing in society for his actions, while the victim both loses face and is unable, within the rules, to dissociate with the attacker. While being hurt in public is not penalized, fighting back and creating a scene results in official reprimand - because "fighting is consensual".

      I found that this is opposite to the way that colleges work, and I suspect homeschools as well. In college one doesn't need to deal with an enemy, they can ignore them, report them & be taken seriously, or simply walk away. There is little to no gain for an attacker because social networks are so diffuse, and a habitual attacker deals with so many strangers on a regular basis that bullying does not gain him respect.

      My solution will probably involve trying to get my kid out of high school and into society as fast as possible. Living in that circumstance, even if you have good friends, damages your psyche. I don't think I've had as much total verbal abuse in the six years since high school ended as I took from my *friends* in high school who were just trying to prove their worth and social standing... my enemies would have been arrested several dozen times if they'd done what they did in high school as adults. The counterpart violence and viciousness just does not exist in the adult world, outside of prison.

      You bastards who were popular? Who were held in high enough regard by your wide circle of friends that loss of standing with them was a deterrent to being assaulted by people who didn't like you? Don't speak of what you don't know.

  61. .SE's ASEA did this on trains in mid-1980's by ivi · · Score: 1

    It's a great story (ie, if the WiFi is reliable, across the trip to school), but we just want to point out that a similar "work on the trip" scheme was available to ASEA employees traveling from Stockeholm & the ASEA company town (whose Swedish name escapes me, for the moment).

    Workstations - desks with FAXes, computers & phones, from all reports - were available on special passenger cars on each AM & PM train, so that staff could catch-up or finish-up as they commuted.

    (Of course, this was before WiFi, so, FAXes would have worked via the mobile network.)

    PS ASEA was the company that had the 1-person, doorless "non-stop elevator"... to go up or down, just hop-in (as the slowly elevator passed the hole in the wall, next to the elevator buttons.

    Note: Be sure to hop out, ie, before the loop of elevator cars took you over the top of the vertical loop! (I suppose, if you didn't, a safety-device would stop the whole loop - eg, to preclude injury, but - in the process - stop the others, as they tried to shave a few seconds off their up/down travel time...)

    "Second wise, minute foolish"?

    Maybe... but at least they innovated in that era!
    (It might have saved some electricity, eg, in a busy building.)

    Does any past ASEA insider have details of the (pre-'Net) net-savings (or otherwise) brought by either of these innovations?

    Do any current [ABB] runs of the Vaesteraas train still offer such workstations, eg, with Internet connectivity, or other additions?

    1. Re:.SE's ASEA did this on trains in mid-1980's by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      The paternoster elevators aren't dangerous at the top or bottom of the loop. They don't even turn upside down. I used to go through them often as a kid at our local hospital (though if my parents knew, they would have been rather cross).

  62. How about just give the tax money to the parents? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    "Towards a Post-Scarcity New York State of Mind (through homeschooling)"
    http://www.pdfernhout.net/towards-a-post-scarcity-new-york-state-of-mind.html
    "New York State current spends roughly 20,000 US dollars per schooled child per year to support the public school system. This essay suggests that the same amount of money be given directly to the family of each homeschooled child. Further, it suggests that eventually all parents would get this amount, as more and more families decide to homeschool because it is suddenly easier financially. It suggests why ultimately this will be a win/win situation for everyone involved (including parents, children, teachers, school staff, other people in the community, and even school administrators :-) because ultimately local schools will grow into larger vibrant community learning centers open to anyone in the community and looking more like college campuses. New York State could try this plan incrementally in a few different school districts across the state as pilot programs to see how it works "

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  63. Maybe not a rolling study hall... by chuckwilson · · Score: 1

    ...but was I the only one racing to get homework done the morning before school? This could be a good opportunity for all the procrastinators to get that last bit of homework done.

  64. Some issues... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    Notice how the character of the bus changed when it became a place with more learner-directed learning-and-playing-on-demand instead of just an extension of day prison. (This is not to advocate violent games for behavior control, of course.) But, as with all such reports, there is no acknowledgment of the bigger issues, or apologies for past trauma and pain caused by aspects of schooling and ignored. What about all those years of bus problems? Those are just ignored, even as they are admitted now that there is a possible solution. What about the implications about children having more control over what they do versus behavior problems including aggression? Again, ignored. Also, what are the political implications of schools controlling network access to children and logging everything they do? Also, ignored. What are the implications of some kids having computers and others not? Again, ignored. Granted, it's a short article, my question is not so much about the reporting as the schooling culture it might reflect.

    There are negative issues for media like being indoors away from sunlight and vitamin D, issues of being sedentary (even on a bus), issues of problematical content, and issues of other displaced healthy activities. But those need to be weighed against benefits of media for education, creativity, connectedness, and empowerment. And that media landscape continues to change with new technologies or new understanding about health issues.

    Some more thoughts on the general topic; rather than wi-fi on the bus, why not just give the school taxes directly to the parents to spend on their family in the free market based on their own unique needs?
        http://www.pdfernhout.net/towards-a-post-scarcity-new-york-state-of-mind.html

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  65. Other than who's paying for the connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the difference between this and the students using their own cell modems?

    1. Re:Other than who's paying for the connection... by Jean-Luc+Picard · · Score: 1

      bigger antenna ?

  66. No one considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it might be the radiation making them docile :)

  67. Daily Bugle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >'Boys aren't hitting each other, girls are busy, and there's not so much jumping around,' said J. J. Johnson, the Internet Bus driver."

    'Bring me Parker!', he added, 'I need fresh pictures of Spider-Man!'.

  68. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by winwar · · Score: 1

    "And that pretty much leaves it to the judge unless those terms are defined.

    I don't think it's unreasonable to leave a 12 year old alone for 3 or 4 hours after school if it's a responsible kid."

    The problem is that many people now think that is not responsible. Those people may include judges. If you are ever in front of a judge it is also likely that something rare but bad has happened and CPS is not on your side. Makes for great media ratings. So people get paranoid.

  69. Are people missing the point? by VertigoMan · · Score: 1

    Well in this case it's a 70min bus ride each direction to a digital school. This school issues every student a laptop instead of the old standard heavy text books. No problem with some students not having laptops. These high school students spend more then 2 hours each day on the bus. Some live on ranches and most likely have a long list of chores to do at home as well, I know I did when I lived on a ranch.

    I agree that not all the kids are going to be doing something productive with the internet, the artical even talks about that, but the ones not being productive are not bothering the ones that are. Think of it as a library setting where the kids are waiting to be picked up, this one just happens to be rolling.

    For those that think the cost is too much. Consider this is only being used on an extremely long route, one bus and that I highly doubt they are paying for the service over the summer. And for those that say being rowdy on the bus is part of growing up. It was just that rowdiness that caused an accident when I was on a bus ages ago. The driver looked up into the mirror to see a fight breaking out and hit a parked car. The bus is not the place to be rowdy.

  70. The bullying will not stop by benchbri · · Score: 1

    All it will take is for a couple of the geeks, nerds and ~wads to fire up World Of Warcraft or start up a torrent client and saturate the bandwidth.

    The bullies will realize this and will then do what they do best.

  71. 400Kbps to 800Kbps? by godel_56 · · Score: 2, Funny
    From Autonet Mobile's FAQ:

    "What kind of speeds can I expect? Over the 3G network, download speeds average from 400kbps-800kbps. Upload ranges from 128kbps-300kbps. When not on 3G the average download is 120kbps-200kbps and 50kbps-100kbps for upload."q>

    Now we know why the kids are so quiet. They spend the whole trip waiting for something to load.

  72. DIY, eventually? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    potential to reduce the involvement of third parties and equipment:

    http://www.sagem-orga.com/index.php?myELEMENT=World%20premier:%20Sagem%20Orga%20and%20Telefonica%20turn%20the%20SIM%20card%20into%20a%20Wi-Fi%20hotspot&mySID=cbd11aad8770d04adc34f134a0bf442b&new_site_id=2

  73. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by colmore · · Score: 1

    I don't think todays kids are learning to deal with boredom very well.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  74. Sing with me... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    The wifi on the bus goes up and down,
    Up and down, up and down.
    The wifi on the bus goes up and down,
    All through the town!
    </sing>

    Seriously though, will we get this on city buses and trains? And the stations? This could considerably encourage the use of public transportation at a fairly low cost to cities.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  75. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the idiot parents that get the DVD player in the minivan. That one blows my mind. "Going to the store kids! pick out a movie for the 5 minute ride!"

    wow..... just wow....

    DVD players in vans aren't to blame. Your mind has long since been blown, as proven by your use of wheezing internet phrases used exclusively by morons unable to form or articulate their own thoughts.

  76. iPhone + Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an iPhone and a laptop
    Thats my wifi on the bus, tethered and 7Mbit/sec connection

  77. Clear the howework queue early by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    This could be wonderful for socialization. Imagine this from a kid's perspective. On a bus, you get to socialize with whoever is seated close to you, and not do much else but horseplay. If you could instead spend that time to do homework, you gain the same amount of free time at home to socialize with the people you LIKE (who may or may not be the same people as you sat with on the bus), and *gasp* maybe even go outside and play!

    More likely though it'll get used to play networked games with or against each other. That's still not a bad thing though, since that is likely something you'd do when you got home anyhow.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Clear the howework queue early by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Because being able to interact with people who you don't actually like is useless and not part of anything kids should be picking up sometime before they turn into serial killers.

  78. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't think it's unreasonable to leave a 12 year old alone for 3 or 4 hours after school if it's a responsible kid.

    You don't think so, but you don't get to make that decision. I'm not in Illinois, but the law is worded very similarly here. I have a child neglect conviction for allowing my then 12 year old to walk home alone. The school principal found out my daughter was walking for 15 minutes along a quiet suburban street. Child Protection here "recommend" that children under the age of 14 are never left unsupervised, and failure to comply with Child Protection recommendations is considered child neglect or child abuse, unless proven otherwise.

    Oh, and in response to all the people who'll say they walked home from school from age whatever, I tried telling them that I walked home alone from age 9. I was told "This shows how abused children grow into abusive parents, and we're here to break the cycle of abuse." Sorry, anyone who disagrees with Child Protection is a child abuser, by definition.

  79. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    To me? One. And it's ongoing. And I don't want my child to have wifi on a bus. Kids are too "plugged-in" today. They're plugged in at school. They have to be plugged in at home, though that can and should be moderated. And now they're plugged in on long bus rides to and from school? And the real reason is behavioral? That's insane.

    Ignoring the semantics about what I'm about to say, I think the internet is the greatest *invention* of all time. I think kids should be exposed to it (and obviously almost all are). But it needs to be moderated with our children. They need to learn without the magic answer button, and they need to learn to coexist with each other IRL :)

  80. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by CyberZen · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this argument is that most of the socialization that occurs in public school settings is unhealthy!

  81. Sedating our children, one status update at a time by zero_out · · Score: 1

    Who needs ritalin when you've got wi-fi on the bus?

  82. work or play? by daisybelle · · Score: 1

    Most of the kids mentioned in the article were doing work. Not all, but well over half. Just a little fyi for all those who assumed every kid was on facebook or playing games.

    --
    "You only get ONE LIFE." Richard Rahl, Faith of the Fallen - Terry Goodkind
  83. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "socialization" my ass.

    Putting a bunch of kids together without supervision (e.g. playground, school bus, even classroom) so they turned to primal behavior (i.e. the alpha male goes around beating up weaker guys to assert his alpha position) is not teaching anyone "socialization".

    Education is shit, in part, because anyone who tried to learn will get targeted and pester by bullies, with no help from any "supervisors".

    Anyone saying it the victim's inability to "socialize" that cause him to be bullied is plain blame-the-victim bullshit.

    I have on both side of the fence. I have been bullied, and yet I have also been in a group bullying other people. The only difference was I whether, at that time, I happened to be close friend with the bullied group or with the bullying group. There has been no change to my "socialization" skills, in fact, I was younger when I was in bullying group.

    If you want to teach kids real "socialization", you put them in a safe environment, with adequate adult supervision. Any reports of physical violence should be followed-up properly (i.e. like the real world). Then kids can learn civilized behavior.

  84. Secure enough for Porn... right? by BadAndyJ · · Score: 1

    Oh Gizz... Come on everyone. On a $200 router you figure you've got all the security locked down for these kids. On computers the KIDS own, you can't lock down shit. How did that song go again. Oh yeah "The Internet is for PORN" The boys arn't beating on one another 'cause they're beating themselves!

    1. Re:Secure enough for Porn... right? by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      You know, it is possible to look at porn without an Internet connection?

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    2. Re:Secure enough for Porn... right? by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school a decade and change ago, the internet connection simply filtered through a proxy that removed unapproved sites. There was no getting around that without finding out where the server was, breaking into the room, breaking into the server, and removing the filter software. So it really doesn't matter what they use to access it.

    3. Re:Secure enough for Porn... right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what kind of proxy are you referring to? There are tonnes of proxies on the internet that make your connection "Anonymous" and they do that with some kind of tunneling, be it SSL or otherwise. Some of these tools are a decade old, others not so much...
      The proliferation of tools like OpenDNS and Google's dns servers make it even easier for kids to get around a school's DNS server, limiting the school's ability to filter based on domain name.
      Remember, if we're talking about internet on a bus, it's very doubtful that the laptops would be owned by the school. It would be privately owned laptops.

  85. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    Right now I'm living in a Chicago suburb (which is, of course, in Illinois,) and I'm pretty sure the neighbor's kids - most of whom appear to be under 14 - are out wandering around outside (gasp) unsupervised (oh my God) and even (what are they thinking) walk to school, a full 2 blocks away.

    In fact, I see a lot of grade-school and junior-high aged kids walking down the sidewalk, presumably to and from school.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  86. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like good parenting...
    Can't wait for the virtual elementary school. Just strap your kid to the gurney and put the goggles on 'em.

    Shouldn't that be put the googles on?

  87. I got bullied in 7th grade by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    by this large 8th grader on the bus. He pretty much bullied everyone.

    One day I was ignoring his insults so he punched me in the arm. I turned around and punched him in the nose with a solid left hook. Blood splattered the back of the bus.

    Never got bullied by him again. Thanks Mom, for all those years of Tae Kwon Do starting at age 4.

    I got suspended for 1 day. Him, 3 days. Mom didn't mind so much, as I followed her rule: "You can defend yourself, but never throw the first punch."

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  88. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 1

    I do think it's unreasonable to leave him alone for 3 or 4 days.

    So what's your take on William Munny? He left his ~12 year old son and daughter alone at home for /weeks/ in Unforgiven.

  89. Let's try that again by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    The average school bus doesn't carry 100 kids. The bigger busses will do 72. 36 to 48 is the more common size, with most school divisions also have a number of 'bitty busses' that carry about 16.

    So if we use 40 for our average bus size, you're at $100 per kid.

    Secondly: Judging the cost of running a school bus by the fuel cost alone is a crock. The rule of thumb I've used is that fuel = 1/3 of TCO, with another third for maintenance and miscellaneous expenses, and 1/3 for fixed costs and depreciation. (Depreciation is front loaded, maintenance and repair is back loaded.)

    On top of that you have to pay for the bus drivers.

    So your $100 per year is now around $400 per year.

    finally candy bars is probably not the most economical choice for fueling kids.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  90. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a lame ass attempt as a troll.

    You are not only a N00b, but a Zer0 skill N00b. Give it up, you really suck at it. Most of us are simply laughing at you and your inability to even do a very basic troll...

    P.S. I agree with lumpy. parents that have DVD players in their cars are really stupid morons.

    Almost as stupid and BMW owners.

  91. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    I think a 12 year old from 100 years ago was much more mature than the 12 year old of today, and it isn't a fair comparison.

    My grandfather was born in 1913 or 14; when he was 13 he was routinely driving a truck delivering sand, gravel and groceries for his father's businesses. He probably would have been fine for weeks.

    I'm not 100% convinced my 19-year-old step-son would be. He'd survive but it might not be pretty. He'd probably be wearing dirty underwear and smelling pretty bad after a week or two. So he'd fit right in on Slashdot.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  92. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by moortak · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, here in a suburb of Cleveland it is nearly unheard of for a child not to walk to and from school. This is true from kindergarten right up until the first of their friends start to drive. In fact the schools are set up around that idea.

    --
    Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
  93. Re:And the zombification of our children continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it's your fault for being a overpaid presumptuous prick with no real skills.

    Just because really stupid rich people hate their kids, does not mean they cant talk to them to teach them to learn how to entertain themselves.

    how about a FUCKING book? or telling them to shut the hell up?

    Only LOSERS pacify their kids with a DVD in the car.

    Hear that? ONLY LOSERS do this.