Slashdot Mirror


New Linux-Based Laptop For Computer Newbies

Smivs writes "The BBC is carrying a report on how people confused and frustrated by computers can now turn to a laptop called Alex built just for them. Based on Linux, the laptop comes with simplified e-mail, web browsing, image editing and office software. Those who sign up for Alex pay £39.95 a month for telephone support, software updates and broadband access. The Newcastle-Based Broadband Computer Company who developed Alex has been working on this project for three years, and didn't immediately adopt a Linux solution — in fact, the first big trial was based on Windows. The company's Chief Technology Officer Barney Morrison-Lyons says that was never going to be the right route: 'The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software — the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux.' Mr. Hudson, one of the company's founders, said the company also intends to launch an application store for Alex for customers who want to add more features and functions to their computer. 'People who love Linux will be keen to develop for this,' he said."

198 comments

  1. unlike Mac or Linux by jomegat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Software can be badly written on any platform, and in any language.

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

    1. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Ben4jammin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an infrastructure guy who manages many Windows servers, I always wondered about this as I am not a programmer. Is the problem the OS, or the programs that run on it? I guess there is a 3rd option: The OS allows for crappy software to run. I would be interested in a discussion (with people knowledgeable of such things) that compares the different OSes in that regard: How good are they at forcing good programming habits and standards?

    2. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in a discussion (with people knowledgeable of such things)

      On Slashdot? I think you took the wrong turn at Albuquerque.

    3. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux." Mr Hudson,

      Ms. Hudson disagrees with Mr. Hudson.

      The operating system doesn't "allow you to write software", bad or good. Garbage software can be written for any platform. And the "PC" is really a netbook that uses their servers to store your data, so you're locked in.

      Subscribers to Alex receive a USB stick which contains user-encrypted data and enables them to log on to their desktop from any Alex computer.

      For their monthly fee, customers also get anti-virus software and 10GB of storage space on the Broadband Computer Company's servers.

      The USB stick contains your log-n credentials, encrypted. Your data is sitting on their box. Vendor lock-in and over-priced.

      They're not doing their users any favours.

    4. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by ErroneousBee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Software can be badly written on any platform, and in any language.

      You are quite wrong. On several occasions Linux has intercepted my code typos, SQL injunctions and XSS vilneravilities.

      Once it even prevented me from accidentally biting into a Marmite sandwich.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a software engineer with a very pronounced UNIX bias let me just say I don't like the way windows hides stuff.

      Sure, sure, most people hate command lines and config files. I know this and I'm not arguing that everyone else is wrong and I am right, or that your grandmother should learn to love bash and xorg.conf or anmything else. I'm just putting across my perspective.

      I don't like it when the computer does stuff automatically and gets it wrong, and provides no way to correct it. Example - Dual monitor setup on my laptop + DVI connected flat panel.

      Linux - system boots up in single screen mode, I log into X and run xrandr to see available displays and modes, then run it again to set them up how I want. There is a gui option also.
      Windows - system boots up with the external screen primary but at the wrong resolution or refresh rate so nothing displays. I unplug the screen and windows (unlike linux) detects this and reconfigures to use a single screen. I log in. Bring up the display dialog and as the second screen isn't plugged in I get no options for it. I plug it in and windows switches back to dual screen at the wrong refresh rate and the panel stays blank. Now we're in a bind, I can;t get at the settings with the screen unplugged and I can't get at the settings applications with it plugged in. Eventually I figure out the key combos to grab and move the display dialog onto the secondary screen so I can fix the settings. Then we're ok.

      Now, most people probably have their screens setup once and don't care after that, and sure as hell don't want to be messing with some hokey command line app called "xrandr", but for me it works the other way around.

      I actually got a bit pissed off with NetworkManager on gnome desktops a little while ago because it hides all its settings and profiles away too, and it's quite tricky to find how to get it to stop connecting to a wireless LAN it's been connected to before. I found this windowsy and annoying.

      So yeah, unless things are seemless and perfect (which it seems nobody has got right yet, though I can't comment on Mac) I prefer being able to get dirty with relative ease. I realise that this is more of a power-user than coder example, but I think it reflects the sort of class of problems we unixy types have with MS. I think. Feel free to to inform me otherwise.

    6. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by toastar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I use linux, Except when i need a real GUI.

    7. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by HoboCop · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that. I'll even distill that a little more. For me, I find windows particularly annoying simply because it constantly does things I did not ask it to do. I expect a machine to do what I asked, and nothing more. Just sit there.

    8. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by svtdragon · · Score: 1

      I agree in principle, but if this was developed with XP in mind, he may be getting at the "applications assume they have administrative rights" issue that prompted UAC. In Linux, the default use case of sudo + restricted accounts does make software developers stick to user-level rights whenever possible.

    9. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a software engineer with a very pronounced UNIX bias let me just say I don't like the way windows hides stuff.

      I'm not a software engineer, and I use a Windows machine approximately 80% of the time... And I don't like the way Windows hides stuff.

      Install a piece of software under Windows, and there's really no telling where it goes. Sure, most of the code will live somewhere in the Program Files directory... But you'll wind up with some DLLs scattered all over the drive, and all sorts of registry entries. Un-install the software and it'll likely leave bits behind. Try to re-install again and you may find yourself with all sorts of odd errors.

      I don't know how many times I've had to manually comb through the registry to clean out left-behind bits of antivirus software that didn't get cleanly removed.

      There's generally no good way to make a backup of your settings before messing with something. Under Linux everything is basically a text file... So I can make a backup of that text file and revert to it if I have to. Under Windows... Well, I suppose I could probably make a backup of the registry... Unless the setting is actually stored in a file somewhere else - like in Local Settings or Application Data or something like that.

      And if I screw something up in Linux it's generally a matter of making a change to a config file that is more-or-less human-readable. Under Windows it's a matter of finding the right checkbox in the right window - which isn't necessarily going to be available if you've borked your machine badly enough that you've had to slave the drive.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    10. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Windows suffers from two main problems:

      1) The old Windows 9x lack of security, which lead an awful lot of programmers to assume that their software would have full access to the filesystem, OS, etc - this is so ingrained that it's taking a long time to be beaten out of some programmers

      2) Having by far the largest desktop market share, it attracts the most programmers; the law of averages dictates that a lot of them are going to be pretty bad at it.

      There is no silver bullet; while some languages, technologies and OSes may encourage good programming practices, it is entirely possible to write god-awful shite using/targeting any of them.

    11. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      >The OS allows for crappy software to run

      All I can really say about that is I'm a big fan of consistency in design, a bad but consistent design is going to be nicer than a system with half a dozen different designs.
      I use Chrome but I get annoyed by the lack of a "Title Bar," keyboard short cuts need to be the same, and so help me God I will kill the person who though it would be a good idea to change the order of options that pop-up when you right-click on a minimized window, their death will be slow and painful if it launches a fucking help system instead of closing the application.
       
      I would love to see OS's do a better job of enforcing the GUI.

    12. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      For their monthly fee, customers also get anti-virus software and 10GB of storage space on the Broadband Computer Company's servers

      And full of what looks like fud. "anti-virus"... really.... What anti-virus software do that run that looks for Linux Viruses? ClamAV looks for windows viruses only. so unless it's scanning their incoming junk for windows viruses just to keep them from passing it along they are giving out fake stuff.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Windows will restart in 15s!
      Windows will restart in 14s!
      Windows will restart in 13s! ...

    14. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by ais523 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Part of the reason is because Windows is backwards-compatible to Windows 3.1 and 95, which were build without reasonable security models. Since then, Windows' security model has improved a lot; but it still needs to be compatible with old programs, which tended to be written quite badly back then. (I'd say older versions of Windows encouraged sloppy coding because it was just so easy, unlike the UNIX variants around at the time which would generally complain if you tried to do things that broke security too badly). Windows also used to be more homogenous than UNIX systems (even nowadays, you can see Linux manpages talking about the difference between BSD-style and X/Open-style, such as this one which summarises the mess). As a result, old Windows programs tended to work even if written badly because they only had one sort of system to run on, which let them get away with dubious things, whereas old UNIX programs tended to need to be written well to work at all. (Classic Mac OS can be pretty-much disregarded here, because nobody uses it nowadays and Mac OS X is based on UNIX.)

      Since then, all the operating systems involved have become more modern. In UNIX land, people were used to porting programs anyway, to get them to run on new variants, so when newcomers like Linux turned up (and later Mac OS X, which is less different from traditional UNIX than Linux is with respect to how traditional UNIX applications behave, although it's a lot more different with respect to newly-written applications designed to run on it specifically), it was generally the responsibility of people to modify applications to get them running on Linux in particular, or whatever. As a result, Linux can do its job quite well without needing to tolerate badly-written insecure legacy applications. On the other hand, Windows would lose one of its major selling points (its compatibility), if it did that. So Windows is written to be very good at running legacy badly-written applications; as a side-effect, though, this means that it's rather good at running badly-written applications, even new ones.

      The end conclusion is that if you want to write well, you can do it on any platform; but lazy programmers who want to write badly will have fewer issues doing so on Windows.

      (There's another force at play, too; the cultures of obtaining software in Windows and Linux are rather different, and as a result, well-written Linux software tends to become much easier to find than badly-written Linux software. I imagine there's lots of bad software out there for both Windows and Linux despite the above effects, but you'll find bad Windows software preinstalled on a newly bought computer alongside the OS itself (people debate the merits of various OSes, but everyone I know hates "shovelware"), and on driver disks with hardware you buy. This doesn't happen so much with Linux, because there's no, or not as much, money in it; people on Linux are so used to (legally) getting software for free, that they're unlikely to pay unless people are offering something of good quality.)

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
    15. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Wish I could give you an extra +1 there. It's simply ignorant FUD to state that any platform can't have badly written software. I've seen badly written software running on multi-million dollar systems before. It happens.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    16. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, that is nice.

      When you fscked the system so badly it won't even boot, the ability to plug the drive in elsewhere, read the logs and tinker with everything from the kernel upwards has been a godsend. It's a long time since I've managed to screw up a windows box that badly, sure, but still..

    17. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      This is my experience on Windows (vista and 7).

      1. Plug monitor into 2nd DVI connector on my GeForce 9800 GX2 card.
      2. Done, start working. (lcd monitor is automatically set at native resolution).

      You could have a monitor with broken EDID, issue with monitor drivers, display drivers or ofcource you could have encountered a Windows bug. I haven't seen any evidence that something as basic as what you're describing is broken for all the millions of people using windows (as it would be, if it was a flaw in the OS itself).

      Feel free to to inform me otherwise.

      Apart from Microsoft's own code, a ton of third party code runs on most windows desktops, its quite a leap to extrapolate from your experience to suggest that there is any flaw in the windows multi-monitor support.

      Also I fail to see how "UNIX" helped you here? AFAIK the UNIX specification doesn't address multi-monitor issues. You could make an OS that could earn the UNIX branding and have terrible multi-mon support that you couldn't fix without actually modifying code (assuming you had access to the code).

    18. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Technically true, this old saw, but that's not the damn point. Don't get me wrong, the CTO's quote IS bullshit, and you're correct that nothing about Linux prevents programmers from writing bad software for it.

      But there is a kernel of truth in what the CTO meant. So before you go congratulating yourself on that +5 (Insightful) for your smug insistence on literalism (and thereby missing the real point, entirely), why not consider what you're missing?

      Almost everybody on Linux uses a distro, right? And the tendency is toward laziness, so we mostly use software on Linux as our distro packages and provides it to us. Sure, you COULD install anything you want, but 99% of the time you won't. Even Linux From Scratch is basically step-by-step recipes, and the package list is pre-selected for you.

      So in practice, the distro maintainers are the gatekeepers, standing between the app programers and the end Linux users, deciding what kind of experience the end user gets. Bad programs get written all the time, but they tend to get censored at the distro level. And most distros are heavily biased toward open-source software, so the distro has the power to patch bugs and fix problems, again hiding flaws from the end user. (BTW, the biggest exception to the open-source bias, proprietary binary drivers, is a nice illustration-in-reverse of this mechanism.)

      Contrast this process with the Windows world: It's hard to get as much done without downloading and installing extra apps and/or drivers that Microsoft didn't package. And that's where the fun starts. Sure, there are lots of high-quality Windows apps (I'm partial to FF, Notepad++, and Eclipse, myself), but there's a lot of shit, too. Anybody who's been forced to work with proprietary, domain-specific, business-oriented Windows apps can tell you horror stories of crap interfaces, random crashes, and slow bug fix cycles, all back-stopped by data format lock-in to make sure that it's just slightly more painful to switch platforms than to keep crawling along with your current torture instrument.

      And I'm willing to give this CTO the benefit of the doubt, since he's giving sound bites to reporters. Reporters don't report what YOU tell them to report, they get to pick and choose on their own. And since they generally have to write to a much lower common denominator than technical people, most reporters will badger you into breaking everything down into over-simplified, simple, single-sentence restatements. Most of the time, these restatements are technically misleading, or just wrong. But the reporter doesn't care, because his readers don't give a shit, and he'll lose them if he writes the accurate technical truth.

    19. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Nursie · · Score: 1

      OK, so it's just my experience, and it was frustrating.

      What I'm trying to put across is that command lines and config files suit some people, and where things go wrong (it's disingenuous to say they never do) I like the level of access I get to the internals on UNIXy systems.

      "UNIX" the philosophy helped me there, not "UNIX" the opengroup specification.

      This was windows 7 by the way. It could well be bad monitor info, but xrandr manged to pick up the correct mode list and preferred resolution/refresh info. I'm sure this is a niche problem, if it happened with everyone we would have heard of it. Nevertheless, the underlying point is not that "OMG Windows is so shit and broken!", because it's not.

      In an effort to make things easier and better for most users, something which I think it is successful at, it hides a lot of things from people like me. I will freely admit to being an edge case!

    20. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Properly behaving windows software will use a handful of locations for different items. The application and all required libraries, not registered by a separate installer or sub-installer will exist in C:\Program File\s or C:\Program Files (x86)\, your individual preferences should be in C:\Users\username\AppData\(local|roaming|local low)\appname\ and system wide preferences will be in the common profile directory. (note the paths changed slightly from NT4 to 2000/XP to Vista/7, but it's much more unix-like today.

      Though to be honest, there's just as much fragmentation on the *nix side. System 7 style vs. BSD style structures. /usr/local/ vs /opt/ as well as a lot of software written so it bloats out the user profile, instead of an application subdirectory. Not to mention replication of portions/all of a profile (windows does this a bit better imho).

      In terms of backing up your settings, you should be able to copy/backup your user folder. If a particular software doesn't follow the standards set out (special directory settings), it isn't the fault of Windows, it's the fault of that piece of software. You can write resilient software for pretty much any platform. And pretty much all of them have settings for where to put certain types of resources. The problem is the number of developers who make/made assumptions in their software that should have been using standards that have been set for over 10 years now, at least the software that's less than 10 years old for windows (since NT4 in '96 and Win98 a couple years later).

      I've seen more than a handful of apps meant to run on *nix platforms that make the same horrible assumptions as well. Also, it's not much less confusing in *nix. You'll need your user profile as well as /var and probably stuff in /opt and /usr/local ...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    21. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "Your data is sitting on their box. Vendor lock-in and over-priced. "

      I don't live in the UK, so I can't comment on their pricing (although it does seem steep), but I have no problem with them keeping users' data on their servers. You think Gramma is backing up all her photos and MP3s on her Windows box? I can guaranty you that she'll be one unhappy camper when her hard drive goes south.

      I'm assuming that it's possible for users to download their data to a local disk, of course. And that if the company goes under they'll give users enough notice for them to get their data off the server.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    22. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by pinkj · · Score: 1

      Install a piece of software under Windows, and there's really no telling where it goes. Sure, most of the code will live somewhere in the Program Files directory... But you'll wind up with some DLLs scattered all over the drive, and all sorts of registry entries. Un-install the software and it'll likely leave bits behind. Try to re-install again and you may find yourself with all sorts of odd errors.

      As a relative newb to *nix (5 years?), this is one of the things I found great about its files structure. Most files have its designated directories which, if taken the time to learn, helps a lot with trouble shooting. Being so used to Windows being a scattered mess, I was troubleshooting things in Ubuntu like I would in Windows and over complicating my efforts thinking Ubuntu was more complex when it was actually laid out a lot simpler.

    23. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All operating systems allow bad software to run, but the difference is how those applications have been developed for that platform over the years.

      Back in the earlier days of DOS/Windows, the concept of limiting what a user (or their account) could do was pretty much at odds with the whole concept of having a "Personal Computer". The whole idea of a PC was that the person sitting behind the keyboard was in control of what happened on that computer, and the operating system should deny them nothing.

      As the DOS/Windows model evolved, password-protecting the computer was added, and eventually levels of user access were developed. But the kicker was that most software was developed by people with administrative access to their computers, and given that the shipped default of all Microsoft OSes up to and including Windows XP was to have one user who was an Administrator, there was no significant penalty for writing software that required Administrator access.

      I've tried to run Windows XP as a limited user, and it was a pain in the shorts. So much software out there simply won't run, requiring me to keep a pseudo-admin account so I could "run as..." or just give up and promote my user account to admin.

      Enter Windows Vista, which as a security model was great - you could run as a limited user and "escalate" permissions for certain software that asked for it. It's almost a copy of "sudo" for Linux. It was a significant step in the right direction, and it started pushing the concept of developing applications with "minimum necessary" permissions (storing user defaults in user accounts or user sections of the registry rather than system folders or HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, etc).

      The vast majority of Windows software authors (including shareware authors) really do design their software to run just fine on a limited account. But there's a good bit of Admin-required stuff out there. Enough that most people don't even try running XP as a limited account, and those that do tend to give up after a while.

      ----------------------

      Compare that to the Linux world. Very few users run as root in Linux. The shipped default of most distros is either to have a separate admin account or (in the case of things like Ubuntu) to use a "pseudoroot" - a root account that does not really exist but that the default user is escalated to upon demand (similar to UAC in Windows).

      As a result of this, most Linux applications are built based on a more limited permissions model - they tend to store their application data in the /home directory of the user rather than scattered out with c:\Program Files (which is read-only to a proper limited user account) for example. If the majority of your users cannot run your software without significant reconfiguration of their machines, they'll squawk about it and you'll tend to change your code to fit the default model.

      So, while neither model FORCES good programming habits, a Linux developer is more likely to be testing his or her code under a limited account, because that's what most of his or her intended users will be using.

      It's not that one OS is inherently more secure than the other, necessarily, but that the shipped default has been set securely for so many years that the developers on a Linux platform are just used to only being able to run in userland, so they're more likely to write apps that way. Windows developers have not (until relatively recently) suffered a penalty for writing things to protected areas.

      With the advent of Vista and Seven, Microsoft raised the issue in terms of how many UAC boxes popped up. And this was the cause of much angst and gnashing of teeth among users. But that move is slowly showing Windows developers that they need to be taking userland permissions seriously too, and that's a good thing in the long run.

      Of course, not all security threats happen outside userland. You can always install software in \My Documents or /home and run it.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    24. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Some systems allow you to be more sloppy than others--

      For instance, in windows XP it's pretty easy to write code that assumes it is "admin" (possibly not even intentionally) and have it pass all your testing and be delivered--when you go into admin on a mac, Linux or windows 7, you are more likely to be aware that you are going into admin mode--on a linux system you are even going to be forced to seriously consider NOT going into root when you start getting reports from users that don't install as root on their machine.

      On the other hand, with Linux you can get really lazy about writing GUIs under the (generally correct and self-sustaining) assumption that most users will be technical enough to use a good CLI interface.

      On the mac, people tend to program for a single API, knowing that apple will most likely completely redesign everything when they move to OSXI and run your stuff in an OSX VM. With Windows and Linux, forward and backwards compatibility is important and will generally be considered all along.

      My point is that there is a HUGE difference in what aspects you are "Lazy" with between platforms (and languages, but that's for another post).

    25. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1, Informative

      but it's much more unix-like today.

      Yes it is.

      Though to be honest, there's just as much fragmentation on the *nix side. System 7 style vs. BSD style structures. /usr/local/ vs /opt/

      True, but generally speaking things are stored in human-readable text files. So I could do a fulltext search for a string and be reasonably sure of finding what I'm looking for. Under Windows things are frequently stored in some odd binary file with a bizarre name that can be much harder to locate.

      In terms of backing up your settings, you should be able to copy/backup your user folder.

      This is true... But I'm not necessarily worried about my personal settings.

      Under Linux pretty much everything, including driver settings and whatnot, is stored in a text config file somewhere. I can make a copy of that config file, tweak it, and see what happens. Under Windows, many driver and operating system settings are stored solely in the registry - which is more difficult (though not impossible) to backup/tweak/test/restore.

      The problem is the number of developers who make/made assumptions in their software that should have been using standards that have been set for over 10 years now, at least the software that's less than 10 years old for windows (since NT4 in '96 and Win98 a couple years later).

      I've seen more than a handful of apps meant to run on *nix platforms that make the same horrible assumptions as well.

      Bad code and bad assumptions have nothing to do with the operating system. You can write crap software and cause problems on any platform.

      Also, it's not much less confusing in *nix.

      Again, generally speaking, Linux uses human-readable text config files.

      You can frequently read a config file and make changes to it even if the software itself won't run.

      You can usually locate that config file by searching for a string - even if that config file is stored in a completely wacky location.

      I personally find these human-readable text files to be easier to locate, troubleshoot, and work with than some of the binary-only config files found under Windows.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    26. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're talking about. It's impossible to write bad software for a Mac, OS X doesn't allow it. Macs also can't get viruses or malware, they never crash, and they make me popular at my local Starbucks while I write my screenplay.

    27. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      My opinion?

      I don't think it's the OS at all, to be perfectly honest. It's the philosophy behind the methods of development.

      Proprietary software written for *nix is oftentimes little, if any, better than proprietary software written for Windows. How have those binary-only drivers treated you, in the past? Yes, EVERYONE says that driver x works a charm - but it screws up YOUR display, and you have to drop back to CLI to fix it.

      The entire problem can be more accurately described as open-source vs closed-source.

      In the open world, you can write really crappy code, and everyone will see it, and everyone KNOWS you write crappy code. If the program has any merits at all, then someone will make an attempt to clean it up, and make it work better. At which point, people begin to take notice of it, it grows, and yet MORE people are looking at the code.

      Closed world? There may well be only 1, or 2, or 3 people in the WORLD who have access to the source. If they write a crappy coded program, it will remain crap forever. It won't even matter if the program actually has any merit - the code will be crap, period.

      Windows is, after all, just software. And, there are a limited number of people with access to that code. Apparently, NONE of them has ever been induced to release that code to the public. The only way to get it, is to reverse engineer, or decompile it. And, there are dozens of idiotic laws against that sort of thing.

      It must be wonderful to have enough money to buy politicians by the trainload . . .

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      In windows if EDID is broken in the monitor good luck if you can even select the right resolution, in linux xorg.conf editing will solve this issue.

      Hiding stuff from users is bad.

    29. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > You think Gramma is backing up all her photos and MP3s on her Windows box?

      If not then you need to tell Grandma that all she needs to do is buy a USB drive
      and "drag things to it". You might even be a nice grandson and buy her the drive
      to start out with.

      The idea that backups should be a drag held more water back in the days of floppies.

      External drives are now plentiful and cheap. Nearly every machine has a means to burn CDs or DVDs.

      Even total n00bs burn CDs in order to escape the limitations of iPhoto.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    30. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > I use linux, Except when i need a real GUI.

      I bought myself one of those. Still not impressed. I still use Linux instead.

      A system should not hide information from the people that are looking for it.
      Although it's OK if they hide it from those that might be frightened by being
      too aware of things.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    31. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Backups on windows (and earlier linux versions, not tried the latest ubuntu etc) are a hassle for end users, who end up either manually copying files (and often forget to do so)...
      My grandparents have a mac, and i got them an external drive and have time machine configured for automatic backups.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    32. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      ...And that if the company goes under they'll give users enough notice for them to get their data off the server.

      Why would you assume that? Unless UK law requires it (and IANAL, nor English, so it might for all I know) I wouldn't assume any such thing as it would be rather extraordinary in my experience.

    33. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      When you have 500G bus powered hard drives, why should backups be anything more than just copying things?

      The overkill and over-complication also means that the backup files aren't standard or portable.

      There is also the question of ensuring that there are enough distinct copies of the back media to ensure
      against media failures and just plain snafus during the backup. You're trying to pretend that Time Machine
      is something that it really isn't and your willful ignorance may eventually cause you to lose data.

      H*ll, you should be safeguarding one of their offsite backups.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    34. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      What pinheaded, Win-centric neandermod marked this Troll? This guy and Nursie have had good, insightful posts modded down for no reason.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    35. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the law of averages would apply just as much to *nix as it would to Windows. Windows would have more bad programmers by raw numbers but Linux would have the same percentage.

    36. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "There are a lot of ways in which software can be bad, some of which are directly associated with Windows: bad UIs, inconsistent APIs, et cetera."

      I'm not sure if you're talking about the applications or the OS. In any case, an inconsistent API may be ugly, but it doesn't lead to bad software unless the programmer made a mistake - which he could just as easily do with a consistent API.

      I don't understand how bad UIs are "directly associated with Windows". There's hardly a consensus even among developers that KDE or GNOME have better UIs than Windows and if you're talking about application UI ugliness, that's primary the app developer's fault.

    37. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      A lot (pretty much most) of unix programs, especially open source ones, will generally let you configure where they install at compiletime... It's typically only closed source stuff that makes strange decisions about where it wants to install.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    38. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Exactly. He lost me right there and I've no further interest in this particular slashvertisement.

      My guess is the statement was aimed at the Linux geek crowd so they would get good press in places like /.

    39. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by TechnicalFool · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair, it's not like the billion-and-one Linux distros make that obvious either.

      So the executable goes in /usr/bin, or is that /bin? Or is that /usr/local/bin?

      Then some other files might go in /var somewhere. Possibly in its own folder, possibly somewhere under /var/spool or some other subdirectory of a subdirectory. Don't forget the various .../lib directories hanging about!

      About the only surefire thing is that config files will go in /etc somewhere, but "/etc somewhere" is about as much help as saying that your settings are "in the registry somewhere".

      I'm an Ubuntu user. I have a dislike for Microsoft and their practices that borders on pathological, however programs do not install into a simple location in *nix systems nor likely any other fully-featured operating system built in the last 10 years. Debian's Aptitude helps a lot, but that assumes you used apt to install the program in the first place. Don't forget to apt-build or whatever your favourite flavour of Linux uses, or you'll have a hell of a time uninstalling that load of gunk you just compiled.

      Also dammit, Ubuntu and Firefox, I told you you're in the UK. Stop underlining "flavour" and trying to tell me it's a typo!

      --
      09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
    40. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why there's even any argument, it's obvious that text files are a vastly superior method of storing configuration...

      They're human readable, easily searchable, trivially editable from recovery environments (ie dont require any specialised tools), trivially editable over a serial console, trivially parsed or generated with simple scripts, can be easily backed up in revision control systems and diffed etc, you can easily put examples online and textfiles will usually allow you to put comments in the files which can be extremely useful.

      Are there any possible advantages to having proprietary binary config files?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    41. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And macos has similar problems...
      I have a TV here which is 1080p capable, but it incorrectly reports its capabilities... I can't get windows or macos to do more than 1080i, but linux can be forced to 1080p quite easily.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    42. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The windows 9x legacy goes much further than that... A lot of the security problems in windows as a result of code that was ported over from 9x or needed to be compatible with the 9x way of doing things... The NT kernel security model was pretty good, but a lot of the cruft microsoft brought over from the 9x series renders much of it useless.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    43. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Yup. The Linux/Unix file system is a lot more logical and has a much better design. That, plus no stupid registry to have to screw with after uninstalling software. "apt-get purge packagename" and everything is gone, including the configuration files. If any directories do remain because they weren't empty apt tells you about them so you can delete them manually.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    44. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      People think they need antivirus, and that it is an essential part of running a computer...
      Give such people a mac or linux box and they will ask for antivirus for it...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    45. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      True but in general Windows software is written worse.

    46. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by jvin248 · · Score: 1

      LOL! That's great! "it's OK if they hide it from those that might be frightened by being too aware of things."

    47. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but on some platforms it is nearly impossible for it to be well written... The OS is a foundation, and no building I know of can stand firm on a defective foundation.

    48. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like windows has a bunch of baggage that makes it a royal pain to secure. unix systems were designed as a network operating system and were doing so long before MSDOS. that and the linux system should be stupid easy to massively remote manage, which gets difficult in windows land (I know about active directory and GPOs, they don't scale that heterogeneously).

      sure there can be bad applications but at least the alex can make sure that mistakes don't progress

    49. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well, I've reported five bugs to fedora & kde this week .. so I'm not exactly sure what you mean.

      Judging by the fact that he switched from windows to linux in the early stages makes me believe that he really meant that its easier for *them* to write bad software for windows. Quite possibly because there are less libraries to use when writing your own app on windows, forcing you to write your own implementation of something that distracts from your original focus for the app.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    50. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Ah, xrandr... the GUI version of it in Kubuntu doesn't let me stretch my desktop, only mirror it. It doesn't let me choose 85Hz for 1280x1024 in the GUI, although that works in Windows. Solution? Edit xorg.conf to manually add a modeline, and after learning the syntax for xrandr, I have to invoke it to activate the ext. monitor at that mode, and then to do a stretch, and then to make the built-in LCD my primary screen (because the ext. monitor is the 1st listed interface, and some component (probably xrandr) thinks it means it has to move the taskbar there.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    51. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Start > Run

      sc stop wuauserv

    52. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that it's possible for users to download their data to a local disk, of course

      ... BUT WAIT - THERE'S MORE! You can subscribe to their cripple-ware linux distro for only $16 a month!

    53. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Nursie · · Score: 1

      xorg.conf has always been too much like dark magic to me and I try to avoid doing anything to it where at all possible.

      xrandr... I'm assuming that as your comfortable with xorg.conf you've tried the position arguments? When addind a second screen to a laptop I usually run something like -

      xrandr --output VGA --preferred --left-of LVDS

      Or if I want to make the external the primary then

      xrandr --output VGA --preferred; xrandr --output LVDS --preferred --right-of LVDS

      Works for me! But then I'm a debian/gnome guy and I have no idea what ships with kubuntu. Also YMMV may vary depending on chipset. With nvidia you pretty much have to use the nvidia-settings GUI

    54. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      I will add that Windows users are more tolerant for badly written software(like periodical crashes).

    55. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu does have a root account. It's just that it's password is not set(and is explicitly locked), so you can only get there by the way of sudo.

    56. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      "UNIX" the philosophy helped me there, not "UNIX" the opengroup specification.

      OK, fair enough.

      What I'm trying to put across is that command lines and config files suit some people, and where things go wrong (it's disingenuous to say they never do) I like the level of access I get to the internals on UNIXy systems.

      Its true that Windows is nowhere near as customizable (and therefore, more 'debuggable') as several other OSs including Linux.

      I would support anyone using Linux if Windows didn't work out for them (no matter whose "fault" it was). I've been using Linux on and off since Slackware 0.9x but have concluded that its not for me. I use Windows like many people here use Linux. I don't run any CPU & I/O hogging anti-virus and other crap and I only use software obtained from white-listed sources (eq. linux repositories). So far its worked out OK for me..

    57. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by sictransitgloriacfa · · Score: 1

      On Slashdot? I think you took the wrong turn at Albuquerque.

      No, that was Bill Gates. He should have taken the left turn.

    58. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      With crap this obscure and complicated Windows will never be ready for the desktop.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    59. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by Nyder · · Score: 1

      the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux." Mr Hudson,

      Ms. Hudson disagrees with Mr. Hudson.

      A girl called Tom, hmm, must be a song in that somewhere...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    60. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      What can I say ... this account has too much good karma to just dump ... (and you'll find out what t.o.m. means if you look at my user profile)

    61. Re:unlike Mac or Linux by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I think I should note, I wasn't advocating use of the registry, and many well behaved windows apps are less likely to use the registry today. Also, you can export registry settings, edit them by hand, and re-import. I'm not a fan of the registry myself, but then again, I rarely have to venture into the registry for anything dealing with backing up the applications I use.

      As to advantages, the biggest advantages to binary configs is going to be performance, and the need to parse arbitrary text configs, and have some reasonable fallback/failure mode. Though XML is pretty reasonable as well as being text based. I really don't like the hybrid xml/text configs of apps like apache though. To be honest, if an application's config/data are in standard locations, I have little issue.

      I do have a lot of problems with applications that will have settings all over the place, some in one registry location, others in another registry branch, and still others in various user and application paths.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Can't be serious by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software -- the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux."

    It's very easy to write bad software on all three platforms. I've done it! Many of you probably have, too!

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    1. Re:Can't be serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't say have - all my software is perfectly written. If only there weren't such a disconcerting amount of bad users out there!

    2. Re:Can't be serious by negRo_slim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd wouldn't say the problem is badly written software. Especially in the context given, the fact that I can create software for the Windows operating system is one of the main reasons I continue to use it. My code may be what some consider bad, but a part of me still gets giddy with every successful compile.

      The root of the issue is people not understanding computers in general. They are machines with their own strengths and weaknesses and that must be understood to avoid being confused and frustrated at every turn. To say simply installing this or that software on this or that computer will alleviate technological ignorance trivialize the problem of vast swaths of the population being effectively illiterate with modern technology.

      It seems to me what these people are really after is an appliance like device.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:Can't be serious by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, that was YOUR driver I was trying to install?!

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    4. Re:Can't be serious by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      It's less of a problem with having badly written software, than it is a problem of users tolerating that software. I tolerate much more crashes of Windows, than I do on Linux.
      As a result of that tolerance, we have widespread bad software.

  4. um... by cool_story_bro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux.

    Yeah. No operating system known to man prevents you from "writing software badly".

    --
    You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.
    1. Re:um... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Yeah. No operating system known to man prevents you from "writing software badly".

      True, up to a point. The best-written software I ever produced was run on a Burroughs B3700 mainframe back in the late '70s, where spare RAM (not being used by the OS, MCP IV) was limited to around 300KB. The machine was running in a bureau situation (younger readers might have to look that up), so CPU time was charged for quite expensively.

      COBOL was (and actually still is) perfectly acceptable and efficient for any commercial packages, but some of the Assembly routines I used to write only took up a few tens of bytes of codespace, but I had to think really hard about how they were meant to work. COBOL takes the fun out of life: it doesn't let you write self-modifying code... :-)

    2. Re:um... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      True, but it is clear that these were the directors of the project and not the techs. Windows, at least in the XP and before incantations, the assumption was "User=Administrator" and that did cause badly written software. I'm pretty sure they mean that... or better said, they were told by their engineers that "Windows allows badly written programs" by their engineers who actually meant "No practical user separation".

      In all fairness: it is entirely possible to run WinXP as a Limited User. It just takes a certain amount of work when you encounter "badly behaved programs". I even prefer the message "Access Denied" over the UAC message of "Cancel/Allow" in Vista or 7. (Yes, I know you can set it up the way I like it, it's just not default any more).

    3. Re:um... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Yeah. No operating system known to man prevents you from "writing software badly".

      That may be, but a good OS will limit the damage that the bad software can cause. For example, denying PEEK and POKE commands (or their equivalents), doing memory management, enforcing security features, etc.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:um... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      doesn't let you write self-modifying code

      Basic will.

      --

      "Will there be anything else, sorr" said the pirate barber as he drove off. Punch

    5. Re:um... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I think when speaking about Windows without qualification the default should be the latest version. The first version of Windows ran on hardware than wasn't even capable of creating "user separation".

      I'm sure there were a lot of problems in the first version of linux - should we use those problems to judge "linux" today?

    6. Re:um... by TechnicalFool · · Score: 1

      BASIC lets you.

      Ruby is designed to.

      It also makes more damned sense.

      --
      09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
    7. Re:um... by cxx · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!

      The real test is what an operating system does with "bad code" -- does it gracefully fail or BSOD? What happens when a program cleans out all available memory?

      There's another aspect, too: what programming style does it encourage? How about GUI style? How about peer-reviewed code? While not strictly part of the OS itself, the programming culture, development tools, and libraries are still connected to how software is written for the OS.

    8. Re:um... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Since they started 3 years ago, I don't think your definition works. Windows Vista just came out with the known compatibility problems.

    9. Re:um... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      What part of the phrase "latest version" don't you understand?

    10. Re:um... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      The part that it was 3 years ago when they started an Vista did not play nice....

    11. Re:um... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Basic will.

      Yes, but in those days BASIC was a toy for snotty-nosed kids. (Many would argue it still is, but that's another matter.)

      On that Burroughs machine we had a choice of FORTRAN, Assembler and COBOL. The latter was tedious and long-winded, but had the advantage of being able to produce bombproof code in very large suites of financial software. But fortunately my job as sysprog was to tie everything together, so I got to use the best tools for the job.

    12. Re:um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe - but there is SQUEAK and Smalltalk

  5. I'm happy by Jorl17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it trully helps less technical people, then I think it can contribute as living proof that Linux (or GNU/Linux, you decide) can be user friendly.

    Rock on!

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    1. Re:I'm happy by hitmark · · Score: 1

      just dont expect any terminal or interface tweak options.

      basically its what asus tried with the first netbook, and where apple have been going since the iphone.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:I'm happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you've proven is that Linux wasn't made for runnig Windows applications. I could make the exact same argument that Windows wasn't made to run Linux applications.

      At least Linux tries to be compatible. See wine, ntfs-3g, and samba.
      I can't even mount non ntfs or fat filesystems in Windows. One could argue that Cygwin is to Windows as Wine is to Linux.

    3. Re:I'm happy by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      I want to install WoW.

      Well, there's your problem right there.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    4. Re:I'm happy by Jorl17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I can't even mount non ntfs or fat filesystems in Windows. One could argue that Cygwin is to Windows as Wine is to Linux"

      One can argue, but that "one" would be terribly wrong. Wine is much more than Cygwin. Just try to get a simple app such as cat running natively, without recompiling it, like we do with Windows' apps. That's what's so good about wine, it's basically just a reimplementation, not a port of anything -- and that, my friend(s), is incredible.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    5. Re:I'm happy by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Sure, and it probably won't be used for people to run WoW either ;) But people like my mother (I'd like to know where I got my skills from), who can't even acknowledge THREE title bar buttons, need this kind of computer. After all, how do we expect them to use Linux if they don't even know what it is? -- If they don't know what a kernel is?. Windows was made for the user, and is so popular that it doesn't need any kind of introduction. Linux, on the other hand, needs basic concepts understood, even due to its architectures. Of course alternatives like this are useful, but they remove the full capabilities of Linux right there. IMO, ofc.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    6. Re:I'm happy by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking this could be an interesting concept for the Tandy brand in the US. I know it's been a while, but they would have a brand from the past that they could leverage for something similar.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    7. Re:I'm happy by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      If it trully helps less technical people, then I think it can contribute as living proof that Linux (or GNU/Linux, you decide) can be user friendly.

      Rock on!

      I agree!
      Nothing proves the power of free software more than spending $61 a month to keep it working!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    8. Re:I'm happy by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Give a clueless little kid a Mac or a Linux PC and they won't care. They will just apply whatever they have learned about using computers to the new machine without any preconcieved notions or brand loyalties.

      Linux works on the same principles as any modern GUI or OS. If you are going to do anything besides run iTunes, you will need to understand the same core concepts regardless of what platform you are using. They used to call this computer literacy.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:I'm happy by dangitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If it trully helps less technical people, then I think it can contribute as living proof that Linux (or GNU/Linux, you decide) can be user friendly.

      It seems the opposite to me. If it's so user-friendly, then why do you have to pay such a high monthly fee for user support? Looking at it cynically, perhaps they chose Linux because it would require more user support, and therefore justify the business model?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:I'm happy by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Well, because....money has to be made ;)

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    11. Re:I'm happy by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      WoW is not a Linux game. If you want to make a good comparison, try installing a Linux game in Windows - it will require the same amount of effort (or more) to get working properly.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  6. no training wheels by Tim4444 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux

    Linux has a lot of good features but I don't know that that it would prevent you from writing bad code...

    1. Re:no training wheels by moogsynth · · Score: 1
      True, but software of a very poor or insecure nature is usually unlikely to make it into most Linux distributions. Well-maintained repositories and package managers pretty much ensure users don't install buggy pieces of crap (for most purposes, any way). People install badly-written software for Windows by combing the web for dodgy-looking downloads; that just doesn't happen in Linux. Well, except for new users who have difficulty reconciling themselves with the limitations of repositories, any way.

      Then again, many distributions are starting to include features for one-click installations of random software and repositories. At least on the one hand it'll stop people from complaining that "omg installing software too hard in loonix", but on the other maybe we'll start seeing people suffer from buggy, cruftinated Linux systems.

    2. Re:no training wheels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod_slap_programmer is included in 2.6.33.rc10, stay tunned.

  7. Linux Alex by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, a FOSS response to Microsoft Bob!

  8. Wait a second... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    Linux... For the inexperienced?

    And its not even Ubuntu?

    Believe me, I've seen people so inept with computers that both the mouse and the keyboard seem like tools of frustration. And I daresay voice recognition, while getting close, is still not quite at the level for full operability.

    And also - you CAN write badly written software for Linux. I once wrote an encryption tool that used random number generation, and not actually a key or passphrase supplied by the user. Needless to say, they were a little disappointed when their password didn't work to decrypt. Luckily I provided them with a brute force solution, that tried every possible combination, in order.

    1. Re:Wait a second... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1
      I caught that to, a computer for people who arent good with computers...hmmm..i know lets give them the most unforgiving os on the planet!

      Try to delete a system critical file on windows? Im pretty sure it wont let you, and even then it warns you about 3 times before it actually does it. Linux just lets you do it and gives you the finger.

    2. Re:Wait a second... by cynyr · · Score: 1

      really? as your user try to delete /etc/fstab ... go on, try it? yep thats right the OS gave you the finger and told you no. Now if you are root it'll happily let you do any old dumb thing you can think of. These are not going to be letting the user have root access. The only "critical" files they can delete then are their own files. Most GUI file managers these days default to asking you about every delete and delete == "mv $1 ${HOME}/Recycling Bin/" so yea. Also apart from the stuff in /boot/* almost every other file can be fixed without a reinstall now a "chmod ugo-rwx -R /*" as root will be hard to recover from and faster if you just reinstall i could recover it from an initramfs(i may start using on just for this) or liveCD to get me started(bash/sh/init/dev/fstab)

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    3. Re:Wait a second... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Try to delete a system critical file on windows? Im pretty sure it wont let you, and even then it warns you about 3 times before it actually does it. Linux just lets you do it and gives you the finger.

      Linux says "Permission denied" if you try to delete anything belonging to root. If you try to sudo, it gives you the same kind of warning that Windows gives.

    4. Re:Wait a second... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      And its not even Ubuntu?

      From the second link: And at the heart of the project is Linux, or at least the Ubuntu variant of the open source operating system coupled with a desktop designed by Alex's own developers.

    5. Re:Wait a second... by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      I doubt the intended audience is ever going to touch the command line and most, if not all, modern gui file managers for any given Linux distro do the same thing as Windows, warn you before you delete anything. And because Linux encourages you not to run as root as opposed to the nothing-works-unless-I'm-admin approach that Windows* takes I would argue that Linux makes it harder for users to hose their system then Windows does.

      * yes, I know it's getting better with Vista and 7, but not much.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    6. Re:Wait a second... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Linux... For the inexperienced?

      Actually, the idea isn't that implausible. I had my wife running Slackware on her computer for several years until she went over to the Dark Side and got a Mac. Actually, she had a good enough reason for the latter: she wanted to use EndNote with MSOffice to write her PhD thesis.

      I know there are alternatives and all that, but my point is that so long as you set the machine up well, Linux boxes are just as accessible as any Windows (or indeed Mac) implementation.

    7. Re:Wait a second... by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      You don't by chance happen to work on the Debian project do you?

    8. Re:Wait a second... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it was YOU I went to college with. You should have known when we all warned you about it, but the failing grade on your final really should have clued you in.

      Seriously, I went to college with a kid who proposed an encryption method that involved taking the ASCII value of each letter in the string to be encrypted, and multiplying each one by a unique randomly-generated 8-digit number. When asked how you decrypted it, he stated that all you needed to do was DIVIDE each character of the encrypted string by a series of freshly-generated 8-digit pseudorandom numbers.

      Needless to say, though the code was well-written in and of itself, he never did get it running for finals, and about a dozen of us spent several hours each attempting to explain to him why.

      PS: He also bought lottery tickets. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    9. Re:Wait a second... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      No, I work on a small project that tries to get FreeBSD to boot off of a series of IBM 80 Column Punch Card.

    10. Re:Wait a second... by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a good thing you're only "pretty sure" about that, because (depending on what version of Windows you are referring to) you're utterly wrong .

      In any Windows up to and including XP, deleting C:\WINDOWS and all subdirs is a trivial task. Windows is generally shipped with one user, and that user is an Administrative-level user. Windows Vista and Windows 7 have UAC, so at least the system will warn you at least once.

      In every Linux distro I've ever worked with (Red Hat, Fedora, SuSE, Ubuntu, Mint, Knoppix, and a few others) your default user is a limited user account. If you went to any system-critical file and tried to delete it, you'd have to go through the extra step of escalating your permissions (log out and log back in as root, invoke su, or run the command through sudo). All three methods require that you enter a password of some sort.

      So, for the vast majority of computers out there, your statement is the complete reverse of the reality involved.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    11. Re:Wait a second... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I've seen people so inept with computers that both the mouse and the keyboard seem like tools of frustration. And I daresay voice recognition, while getting close, is still not quite at the level for full operability.

      If you've ever seen the results of a usability test you'll know problems with mice are the rule, not the exception. Pretty much every usability test I've done with the general public includes at least a few instances of users clicking the wrong mouse button. I've even seen it happen in testing with expert users, in one case all users were security architects or administrators for major ISPs and we still saw mistakes with which mouse button to click. It is almost certainly the most common usability flaw in modern computing.

      And I daresay voice recognition, while getting close, is still not quite at the level for full operability.

      I don't think we'll see voice recognition take off until we get computers managing the soundsystem for homes. Until they know what is going out of the speakers for video games, movies, television, music, telephone calls (ringer), computer system beeps, etc. they won't be able to filter out those sounds from potential incoming commands.

      And also - you CAN write badly written software for Linux.

      Of course you can, but given or lack of context we don't know what he was referring to. It could be he was referring to the Alex systems as closed ecosystems only able to run vetted software from their store, or he could have been referring to the needed privileges for applications on different platforms. Who can say. I just ignored that whole bit as being to vague to deserve my attention.

    12. Re:Wait a second... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it was YOU I went to college with. You should have known when we all warned you about it, but the failing grade on your final really should have clued you in.

      Seriously, I went to college with a kid who proposed an encryption method that involved taking the ASCII value of each letter in the string to be encrypted, and multiplying each one by a unique randomly-generated 8-digit number. When asked how you decrypted it, he stated that all you needed to do was DIVIDE each character of the encrypted string by a series of freshly-generated 8-digit pseudorandom numbers.

      Needless to say, though the code was well-written in and of itself, he never did get it running for finals, and about a dozen of us spent several hours each attempting to explain to him why.

      PS: He also bought lottery tickets. :)

      A variant on that (use XOR rather than multiply/divide) does actually work if you seed the RNG with the same value both times and use a password provided by the user as a seed. It's not exactly going to give professionals a headache but it'll keep your younger brother out of your files.

      The only bijou issuette is the encrypted files are not necessarily portable because unless you provide your own RNG you can't be sure that the algorithm used by rand() is the same on different platforms - or indeed the same across different versions of the standard libraries.

    13. Re:Wait a second... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Right, agreed. But he wasn't talking about using a known seed (in fact, it's no longer a "random" number sequence if you can reproduce it using a known seed, it's a deterministic number set, with the seed as the true encryption key).

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    14. Re:Wait a second... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      If you did implement voice recognition, you would have to return to a command line environment... Talking is much closer to a command line.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    15. Re:Wait a second... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Problems getting the wrong mouse button is most likely the reason Apple have traditionally only used a single button...

      And a voice recognition system for interacting the computer would mean a return to the commandline, a commandline is effectively a conversation in textual form between you and the computer, where the computer has it's own simplified language. It would be extremely difficult and unnatural to try and explain and interact with gui elements vocally.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Re:Give it to newborns by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    Give it to newborns before they get intoxicated be anything else.

    > The BBC is carrying a report on how people confused and frustrated by computers can now turn to...

    Those people might already suffer from permanent damages from using what they are using now.... ;-))

    I am confused and frustrated by your post.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  11. BBC? by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

    This will be helpful to the geeks BBC, whom have been trying to get and keep support for non-microsoft browsers alive.

    Unfortunately, this probably won't be alive long enough to make a difference.

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  12. It's probably just a Beta unit by Duradin · · Score: 3, Funny

    The real Alex is off fighting the Ko-Dan armada.

    1. Re:It's probably just a Beta unit by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, I'd so bump you with a funny for that Last Starfighter reference.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  13. Re:£39.95 a month? by chrb · · Score: 1

    The price is comparable with similar home broadband+laptop deals.

  14. Re:£39.95 a month? by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a slightly higher fee, can I just get someone who will use the computer for me whenever I need to do something on it?

    That's expensive. IBM used to have that for their top executives, in the 1970s. The executives got a 3270 display with a phone handset. When they picked up the phone handset, they were connected to an operator who could bring up IBM internal financial and sales data. Really.

  15. Rip Off by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

    Looked at the website. They're charging £400 for a minimum specced Celeron laptop. I can't even find a laptop worse than their one but you can get much better ones for £300 (less if you want a net top). Other than that, the broadband and tech support is largely priced the same as similar services.

  16. How many likely customers? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    you want to introduce millions of people to computing for the first time.

    Ok. How many people out there have never seen a computer before? Besides newborns, and valley girls, how many people have not used a computer before?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:How many likely customers? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      327. Definitely 327 new customers. 327 new potential customers. Definitely. WHOOP WHOOP.

      (it's marketing, duder, they're talking it up, that's what marketing people are supposed to do)

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:How many likely customers? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, given the disproportionate number of people who have never used a computer before who are of extremely advanced age, by the time you finished typing that it was 326.

      Now it's 325.

      Nope, 324.

      Drat. By the time it goes to market, no one in the target audience will be alive to buy it.

      323.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:How many likely customers? by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Millions.

      Just because the first- and second-world countries have more computers than they know what to do with, doesn't mean that the same goes for all those billions of people in other countries .

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  17. Re:£39.95 a month? by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

    That isn't really like for like as they're mobile internet deals (ie 3g) and come with netbooks with 3G modems.

  18. "New Linux-Based Laptop For Computer Newbies" by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

    This can't end well.

  19. Biggest Problem? by WarlockSquire · · Score: 1

    "The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software — the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux."

    agreed. — what?

  20. Take that, iPad! by etherDave · · Score: 1

    ...seeing as the overwhelming conclusion drawn about the iPad I have encountered is "this will be great for my grandma." NOW my grandma can have something more affordable, and something that I won't hate to help my grandma use.

  21. I don't quite see the market by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "People who love Linux will be keen to develop for this," he said

    No they won't. People who love Linux/community/whatever will develop for Linux/community/whatever. People who would love the chance to make a quick quid/dollar by packaging up a FOSS app for the app store will love it, but that won't create a marketplace full of will supported apps. And the general public see the "free!" part of Linux and the "free!" part of FOSS apps and won't be wanting to pay for apps from an app store, especially while paying that much a month for a support contract.

    39.95 a month

    You can get a free netbook or lowish spec laptop for that, which will come with Windows and will run Ubuntu quite happily, with many mobile phone contracts over here. This comes with mobile Internet access and a phone you can make/take calls and send texts with. I don't see the market - people will not want to get a free computer then pay that much for support when they can get a free netbook just by agreeing to a mobile phone contract and moan about the lack of support they aren't paying for later (and/or get their mate to support them because Dave knows about these things).

    The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software — the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux.

    This is wrong on a level or two. While I'm no fan of Windows and the terrible that definitely exists for it, I've also seen terrible apps and scripts for Linux too. No OS can protect the world from slap-dash design/programming with not mind for security.

    1. Re:I don't quite see the market by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I've just bothered to scan the article and related links, and they want you to pay a fair chunk for the laptop then pay for the support contract. That is not going to happen. It reminds me of a cartoon of a computer market stall advertising "computers for people who know nothing about computers, PentiumIIs for only $5,000"!

    2. Re:I don't quite see the market by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      39.95 a month

      You can get a free netbook or lowish spec laptop for that, which will come with Windows and will run Ubuntu quite happily, with many mobile phone contracts over here.

      Note, the article quotes 39.95 british pounds per month for this service, but that version includes the high speed data service plan. The laptop and support plan are 9.99 british pounds, or about $20. I'd further note, the actual service quotes 24.99 british pounds with the broadband, not 39.95. So $50 per month including the high speed data plan a wireless router and free setup in your home is not all that expensive compared to prices in the US.

    3. Re:I don't quite see the market by westlake · · Score: 1

      You can get a free netbook or lowish spec laptop for that, which will come with Windows and will run Ubuntu quite happily

      The problem is that the Windows laptop will happily run pretty much every FOSS app that is out there is well. The GIMP is there. Inkscape and the rest. But so are Photoshop, Paint Shop and Paint.NET.

      That freedom of choice makes Windows a very appealing platform.

  22. Re:Give it to newborns by ls671 · · Score: 1

    > I am confused and frustrated by your post.

    Sorry about that.

    But it was my first thought. It is amazing how people used to Windows react the first time they use a Linux desktop. Also, note that Linux distros have to offer desktop managers that look like Windows in order to ease the transition.

    Let's face it, right now, for most people Windows is synonym of desktop computer and they learn that concept early in their life now.

    So for most people, Windows fits the task and they are not interested in learning something else, it just isn't a priority for them and they would rather spend their time doing something else.

    Hence, start early, give it to newborns ;-))

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  23. Re:Give it to newborns by indian_rediff · · Score: 1

    Actually I have done something similar to this at my home. My kids (now aged 12 and 10) have been using Ubuntu for the past 3-4 years for their school projects. The older one (my daughter) is more resistant to technology in general. She doesn't like using computers :-)

    My son has realised that I am never going to buy a Windows PC for him. Leave alone MS Office. The township here uses the Mac. Also, they have seen Windoze on my dual-boot laptop (on Ubuntu right now as I write this) and on my wife's laptop. I have been able to help them with their presentations (using Impress), their documents with Writer and it has been fairly painless.

    I believe conditioning is all that is needed to get kids to realise that there is more than one way to do things. Getting them used to 3 operating systems at this young age and getting to see that it is nothing different has been uplifting. They have learned to live with this - and even enjoy the wider variety of games available for Ubuntu.

    I also know that I am probably the only parent that does this with his kids. As a matter of fact, I have asked everyone around, and I have yet to meet anyone else that walks the walk - with their family, not just themselves.

    Indian Rediff

    --
    All views my own. Anyone else with the same views needs to have his/her head examined.
  24. Good luck with that by C3ntaur · · Score: 1

    It's the applications, stupid.

    The first time Joe Newbie tries to open a Shockwave web page, send an OpenOffice document to his buddy (who uses MS) that opens with crapped-up formatting, or tries to connect to an Exchange server (and no, OWA light is not a good alternative), he's going to have a bad taste in his mouth.

    Badly written or no, the majority of the desktop/laptop world is using closed source products that are largely designed not to play well with anything else. Add to that teams of developers on the closed source side who are paid to iron out the nagging little bugs and quirks that make the (G)UI experience uncomfortable to the end user, but that most open source developers aren't interested in dealing with (it's not an itch they need/want to scratch). I don't know how open source can compete with that.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Good luck with that by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i think you just overshot the target market for this by several miles...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:Good luck with that by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      The first time Joe Newbie tries to open a Shockwave web page, send an OpenOffice document to his buddy (who uses MS) that opens with crapped-up formatting, or tries to connect to an Exchange server (and no, OWA light is not a good alternative), he's going to have a bad taste in his mouth.

      If the machine is being targeted at newbie users, then I take that to be retired old folks or home users - in which case it's highly unlikely they're going to be connecting to an Exchange server for email; more likely IMAP, POP or Webmail.

      And why is the doc format issue any different to my receiving an Office 2007 format document when I only use Office 2003?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:Good luck with that by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      The first time Joe Newbie tries to open a Shockwave web page, send an OpenOffice document to his buddy (who uses MS) that opens with crapped-up formatting, or tries to connect to an Exchange server (and no, OWA light is not a good alternative), he's going to have a bad taste in his mouth.

      WTF? Have you got a clue stick? Smack yourself over the head with it please. The people who this is aimed at have no idea what an application is, never mind shockwave web sites or an exchange server or what OWA is.

       

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can click the link and install the compatibility pack. Then the docs open and look exactly as you'd expect.

    5. Re:Good luck with that by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      You can click the link and install the compatibility pack. Then the docs open and look exactly as you'd expect.

      Yep, exactly right. But to a newbie user what's more difficult? Locating and installing the Microsoft Compatibility Pack or just doing a "Save As" in a suitable format in OpenOffice.org?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    6. Re:Good luck with that by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Closed-source software is designed not to play well with anything else, so open-source software gets more work towards adding that compatibility back in. Office 2007 documents don't look so bad in OpenOffice.org 3.1.

      As for UI quirks, it's just a matter of getting a designer to work on the app, or even paying the developers to do it for you, or at least report the quirk. If the software is popular enough and your idea/report deemed valid enough, it'll be fixed or improved no problem, sometimes even by the app's original developer.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  25. Enough with the appstores! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hope to be the middle man between customers and developers for a large portion of the market looks awfully attractive to business types. It always has: That's the music industry business model and the same hope fueled a good portion of the new economy craze. The lock-in attempts are disgusting.

  26. Linux Clippy by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like you are trying to write some bad code for Linux.
    Would like to me to obfuscate that?

    1. Re:Linux Clippy by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer the name "Linux Snippy" for that feature.

  27. Re:Give it to newborns by infuriatedweasel · · Score: 1

    This is the way it is in our house. My three kids have grown up with Ubuntu for at least 4 years. My wife's laptop has Windows on it, and so does the computer connected to our TV. My oldest just bought a laptop for her first year of college this year, and it came with Vista on it, so that's what she uses now. We all use OpenOffice. I offered to put MS Office on my wife's computer when my employer offered a discounted version, but she didn't want it. The public schools here use Macs, so the kids see those too. They just don't really care what operating system they use. Oh how wonderful to grow up with freedom and without prejudice!

  28. Re:£39.95 a month? by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    Yes but now that can be outsourced to India.

  29. Re:£39.95 a month? by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's still way better than using Lotus Notes.

  30. This business is doomed. by jwietelmann · · Score: 1

    Now don't get me wrong; I'm fine with people making money on Linux, but this whole business model does stink of shameless freeloading. And FOSS freeloaders never seem to last long in the market.

    It seems like they're just going to take an established distro, make a couple UI modifications, and add a proprietary app store. Then they're going to make customers buy the (overpriced) computer, yet still charge a subscription for not just broadband (which is reasonable) but software updates. Software updates that other people wrote and tend to provide for free. And then there's that app store, and I think you're right: They're probably going to make users pay for software that otherwise would be completely free.

    The Linux ecosystem seems to have a way of punishing freeloaders who monetize FOSS without contributing substantial added value. And this business does not seem to add enough value. Rather than developing for a new distro, wouldn't time be better spent creating an Ubuntu, Mandriva, or SUSE store in which for-pay apps are sold alongside free downloads of free-as-in-beer proprietary software and FOSS. Now that would be something that really adds value.

    BTW, I am aware that Ubuntu is considering some sort of "app store" interface; I just don't know exactly how that's intended to operate.

    1. Re:This business is doomed. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Now don't get me wrong; I'm fine with people making money on Linux, but this whole business model does stink of shameless freeloading. And FOSS freeloaders never seem to last long in the market.

      That's because it is so easy to undercut them in the market or at least match their prices. These people can do this for now because they have first mover advantage. o one else is selling simplified Linux laptops with internet and support services. They can even start out charging for freeware apps, because their customers won't know the difference or have alternatives.

      This won't work in the long term, however. Someone else can take all their OSS code and do the exact same thing, except with different branding and with all those freeware apps actually free of charge. The market will then force these people to change or die to compete. And I have no problem with them charging for freeware apps to start and making some money off of them. They're taking a risk by being pioneers and others will learn from their mistakes. They deserve the extra cash. Hopefully, however, they won't expect it as an ongoing revenue stream.

      And this business does not seem to add enough value.

      I disagree. Simply preinstalling and configuring Linux on laptops and offering a full service support and data setup is significant value added. But going forward, their margins will probably get smaller as they have to compete with others who do the same thing; or they will have to start adding additional value. Dedicated support people cost money, and these people are going to discover it is cheaper to pay a couple of programmers to make fixes to Linux, than it is to continually answer phones and work around bugs. If nothing else, that makes this a win for the Linux community.

      Rather than developing for a new distro, wouldn't time be better spent creating an Ubuntu, Mandriva, or SUSE store in which for-pay apps are sold alongside free downloads of free-as-in-beer proprietary software and FOSS.

      Actually, I think they're being smart by targeting a niche market of really basic and incompetent computer users. The interface for all the distros you mention is inappropriate and too complex for their market. Have you seen the demo. It is a list of about 6 giant buttons down the side for the applications and three tabs at the bottom for various web resources. It is much more appropriate for very basic users.

      BTW, I am aware that Ubuntu is considering some sort of "app store" interface; I just don't know exactly how that's intended to operate.

      The plan is to build it into the AppCenter package manager in 10.x. I don't think all the details are hashed out yet. In general you'll be able to buy, download, install, and uninstall commercial apps from Canonical using the same package manager as you use for freeware.

  31. BBC Micro by Comboman · · Score: 1

    The BBC has a long history of selling overpriced computers.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  32. "Badly written software" by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming that he's referring to the fact that lots of old Windows software and even some new ones require the user to have admin rights in order to run properly. That and the fact that Windows' handling of user data has been a moving target from version to version makes for some real support nightmares that (to the best of my knowledge) you just don't see in the Mac and Linux world.

    To put it in a nutshell, Mac and Linux are much more structured and consistent about separating user, system, and application files than Windows, and this makes software written for those platforms less likely to have problems. In my experience of supporting hundreds of Macs and PCs running scores of applications, he's right.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  33. Horsecrap by fooslacker · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software — the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux

    Please, I've written crappy software on all sorts of OSes...quit being a fanboy.

  34. Re:Give it to newborns by flabordec · · Score: 1

    They have learned to live with this - and even enjoy the wider variety of games available for Ubuntu.

    When the "success story" is that people have "learned to live with" something, then it probably means that something is not so good to begin with. I use Linux on all my computers at home, but the only time I tried to force it on my brothers and parents they were incredibly pissed off. Linux is still for geeks and it probably is better that way, it gives us a sense of belonging.

    And on another note, what wider variety of games available for Ubuntu? How many games were released for Ubuntu this past year? How many games were released for Windows?

    --
    "I see undead people" Warcraft III - Necromancer
  35. lol by charliemopps11 · · Score: 1

    This company is going to sink like a stone.

  36. Re:Give it to newborns by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

    Since you're putting your pants down, go and buy a console, heard that they make you pay for playing on-line, sure you like that. Oh! And BTW, MW2 runs very nice in Ubuntu.

  37. Re:Give it to newborns by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Besides the odd Windows-only game, I don't really see the youth of today caring much.

    The idea that they need msoffice and can't just use any old word processor or spreadsheet is some antiquated idea from an older generation.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  38. Why troll? by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why am I modded troll?

    I went out of my way to answer the parent's question in a level headed way and stress that I was putting forward my (minority) opinions/experiences and not wide-reaching value judgements. WTF?

  39. Oh, come on. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    company's Chief Technology Officer Barney Morrison-Lyons says that was never going to be the right route: 'The biggest problem with Microsoft is badly-written software — the operating system allows you to write software badly unlike Mac or Linux.'

    That kind of makes me question their level of competency. It is possible to write software badly for any platform, device, or language. Saying otherwise means only that you're mis-parroting something one of your underlings has said.

  40. Free as in Big Distro Org is watching? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    So you must like the iPhone model where Apple is the gatekeeper. It's all about quality of course.

  41. iPhone contracts are 30-40 / month by fantomas · · Score: 1

    £39.95 sounds a lot for sure - I wouldn't pay it - but then to put it into context, iPhone monthly contracts are 30-40 a month so I guess they are positioning themselves there. If people will pay out 40/month to have a handheld computer, why not the same for a laptop with tech support?

  42. Alex sounds a lot like ELDY from Italy by fritsd · · Score: 1
    There was a BBC news page last year about another British project, simplicITy, which used the Italian ELDY Linux project to get elderly people acquainted with computers.
    Here's the link: http://www.eldy.org/ (in italian), http://www.eldy.eu/ (in english).
    Some more links: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldy, http://www.webnews.it/news/leggi/4217/eldy-linformatica-per-la-terza-eta/ (in italian) (I wonder if this isn't refered to more often because the primary sources are in italian?)
    Apparently the idea is that the project contains both a technological and a social component: young people are encouraged to teach the elderly.
    I absolutely *love* this quote on their english page:

    Teach the people who taught you how to walk, how to surf the Internet!

    Personally, I don't care if they earn a lot of money (ripping people off / providing a value-added service) by selling them gratis (FOSS) software, as long as it means that more old people can take their first baby steps on the informational superdirttrack. My parents acknowledge that nowadays, you seem to need that internet for more and more stuff, but they find it a bit too difficult to use.
    Down with the Digital Divide!

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  43. You've been trolled by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Wonder how many hits they got for that one.

    --
    Deleted
  44. Re:Give it to newborns by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    But this is gonna be about as similar to using Linux as driving a Ford is to building your own F1. This thing is gonna be totally locked down, with the only way to add apps is via an "app store" where ONLY the things they approve of and which are known to work perfectly with that particular hardware will be allowed. That is nothing at all like using a FLOSS or even Windows based machine, and much more like using a cell phone.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  45. Re:£39.95 a month? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    You get broadband, subsidised laptop and support... You're not just paying for the laptop, you're actually paying for a managed service... That's actually a good thing, many people simply lack the required knowledge to manage a full featured OS connected to the internet.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  46. Re:Give it to newborns by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    That is until they turn in an Open Office paper to a teacher using MS Office and their paper gets turned into word salad. trust me, been there, done that, got the t-shirt. That is why I ended up installing MS Office 2K through Crossover Office when I was running Linux. You do a complex Open office doc, with headers and footers and inserts and graphs? MS Office will shit all over that thing buddy.

    Now if you have an old Office 97 doc that MS Office 2K3 has shit all over? Open Office can fix it, that is why I always have a copy of the latest Open office on hand. But when it comes to complex docs MS Office can get flaky if you skip more than one versions, like Office 97 to 2K3, never mind Open Office to MS Office. And before anybody says PDF, teachers don't want PDF and will give you the F at the end of PDF if you try it. So while I would recommend Open Office for home users, I would NOT recommend for students. Nobody wants to bust their ass on their paper just to get an incomplete because the teacher's MS Office turned it into gibberish.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  47. You are *completely* wrong by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The USB stick contains your log-n credentials, encrypted. Your data is sitting on their box. Vendor lock-in and over-priced.
      They're not doing their users any favours.

    They are making a system which is designed for 90%+ of people, not you. You as (probably) an IT professional are almost certainly part of the problem, not the solution. A task based paradigm.
    No desktop. No applications. No files, no file formats. No viruses. No backups. No networking. etc etc. Not a computer at all. None of the bullshit which suffuses computers.

    That's the favour they are doing for their users. I've been using computers for... *decades* and y'know, it sounds good to me. Hell, it even includes broadband and offsite backups too.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:You are *completely* wrong by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Except they are NOT making a system designed for 90%+ of the people.

      Do the math.

      Let us run the numbers. There are 6.8 billion people, so 10% of that would be 680 million.

      BUT WAIT! There are already over a billion personal computers in the world! According to you, hundreds of millions of people have computers that they can't use!

      And if you actually went to their site like I did, you'd know that they don't tell you what sort of broadband package you're getting. That alone screams "Warning Warning Will Robinson!"

      But if you think it's such a great idea, you're free to subscribe to their software for "only $15 a month" and install it on your "overly complicated PC."

      Me, I'd rather spend the money on something else.

  48. Re:Give it to newborns by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

    It is amazing how people used to Windows react the first time they use a Linux desktop. Also, note that Linux distros have to offer desktop managers that look like Windows in order to ease the transition.

    Actually M$ ripped off the MAC desktop for their windoz interface in the beginning
    This makes the Linux desktop a no brainer. KDE & Gnome have followed with similar GUIs.
    Since then only minor enhancements have been introduced by each player to attempt something that defines their product over that of their competitor

    Today we are left with the M$ vs the MAC marketing Juggernauts. And then there is Linux.

    The only refreshing innovation I have seen in the past few years is the KDE move from V.3 to V.4 which I find refreshing to the lame changes by M$ from '95 -> '98 -> 2K -> XP -> Vista -> ??

    What makes you feel comfortable and more productive is what is most important at the end of the day

    My desktop is the latest KDE4 on top of Kubuntu. Wallpaper is a JPG of the Milkyway. I have NO icons cluttering it whatsoever. I added panels to the 3 remaining screen edges, all 4 set to auto hide. The added 3 contain application icons to launch my favorite apps. The top one hold most office & business apps. The left holds multimedia & right has system management and development app launchers.

    This is something you cannot do with windoz or MAC. My desktop, my way ..
    This is innovation the other two do not offer and what separates Linux from them

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
  49. Re:Give it to newborns by flabordec · · Score: 1

    And this is relevant... how? My point, which still stands, is that a success story should not end with "in the end it sort of sucks, but we have learned to live with it", and my other comment that the number of games released for Ubuntu is smaller than the number of games released for Windows is true, even if MW2 runs very nicely.

    BTW, the PS3 is free to play online, actually that is why I bought one.

    --
    "I see undead people" Warcraft III - Necromancer
  50. Video of Alex by PineHall · · Score: 1

    Video of Alex is available at the Alex website.

  51. Ditto! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, ditto on the Gnome networking manager.

    I still dont know where the config for my wireless went. I suspect they added it in the dynamic scripts. I got it to work another way, but it was frustrating as hell to find nothing in /etc/network/interfaces.conf, and have to spend lots of time on some operation that should have been simple.

    I dont like Linux command-line and config-files, but they are very convenient as it is state-of-the art, Im sorry to say. However, would like to see things progress, and not become too much bound to the GUI, which is always so constricted, and sometimes outright buggy. Why not standardize beyond POSIX and these ancient command-line toggles and inconsistent standards is beyond me.. After the Linux Standard project, it has become better between distros, but the technology has stranded like a bloated whale unfortunately.

    I ended up downloading a program to reconfigure my wireless to use another metric, but really, that should have been easily found in both the GUI and config-files, but in Gnomes networking manager, it was nowhere to be found in the default install..

    1. Re:Ditto! by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I eventually found that under your home directory, somewhere buried beneath the .gconf, .gconf2 or .gnome settings directories there was a networking/wireless dir with another directory for every network it's ever been connected to. Delete that and it forgets. I don't know what's inside them because I didn't look but you may be able to change settings by editing the files you find there.

  52. walking .. by jvin248 · · Score: 1

    two kids 6 and 3 run Ubuntu exclusively. Games and some media applications on Linux itself and on the web via Firefox. Tough for a Windows machine to keep up with them - I have to only install new software for them from time to time that they want to try out (movie making, etc). No maintenance.

    Gave up on the luddite wife .. remote server access for her work is Windows Server and they just upgraded to 2008 that checks not only browser but OS level to not allow log in. She didn't want to deal with any work-around "I don't have time for that". Now, anything happens in Windows (crashes, etc that happen frequently and "no time for this either") and I say, "I don't know how to fix that". "You want me to install Linux on there?".

  53. Re:Give it to newborns by djrosen · · Score: 1

    And this is relevant... how? My point, which still stands, is that a success story should not end with "in the end it sort of sucks, but we have learned to live with it", and my other comment that the number of games released for Ubuntu is smaller than the number of games released for Windows is true, even if MW2 runs very nicely.

    BTW, the PS3 is free to play online, actually that is why I bought one.

    Its really gonna suck for you when they start charging then I guess.

  54. Re:Give it to the unborn by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Seems like all the people I know who openly profess to "hating computers" have never used Mac OS or GNU/Linux.
    Their experiences with Windows has soured them against all computers.
    Paradoxically, they are reluctant to give up the OS they hate because they have invested so much energy (intellectual and emotional) in learning how to cope with it. They can't stand to think of all that effort being wasted and assume that none of their Windows experience will be helpful in learning a new OS.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  55. Re:Give it to newborns by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Bravo! Keep up the good work. I had lots of fun introducing my gf's kids to Debian a few years ago. They had an old HP Pavilion gathering dust in their basement on which I installed Debian. Turns out they didn't care what OS was running as long as it was connected to the Internets. Go figure.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  56. What's it with that "app store" cancer? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    an application store for Alex

    That’s called a package manager! Like paludis/portage/ports/APT/pacman/pkgsrc/yum/urpm/etc. Look it up.

    I think package management is such an important and well done part of Linux, that one could add it to the properties, for which the following is true:
    “Those who don't understand Unix are doomed to reinvent it, poorly.” :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  57. Linux installs 'hide' stuff also by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    Until you become familiar with the Linux file structure, installing a program can appear to hide stuff just like installing a windows program does.

    sudo apt-get install mysql

    and you might end up with stuff in /etc/mysql.conf /var/opt/mysql /usr/bin/mysqld or maybe /usr/sbin/mysql or or or

    And it seems like different packages on different distros stick files in different places.

    So if you have someone that does not know Linux or Windows, and have them install something on both platforms, and then ask them to find all the files the program installed, start the program, and configure it, it will most likely be just as difficult.

    I'll grant you, after you learn Linux, and especially if you stick with one linux distro for long enough, determining where files end up after an installation can be easier.

    1. Re:Linux installs 'hide' stuff also by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      The key difference for me, however, is that under Linux pretty much everything is a human-readable text file.

      The package you download with apt-get contains a text file somewhere in it that tells you exactly where everything is going to be installed. Under Windows, that's not necessarily the case.

      And once the thing is installed, the configuration settings are again in a text file. You can search your drive for a string and have a good chance of locating all the config files, wherever they may be. Under windows, some of those config files are going to be binary and the best you can hope for is a filename match. Or settings might be stored in the registry... Which will require you to run REGEDIT and then search for a string.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  58. You're right Jed, but... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    even though backing up is easy, I have a hard time believing that even half of home users do so with any frequency.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:You're right Jed, but... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about the really important stuff, then frequency isn't
      such a big deal. It's far more important that it be done right and not in
      any way half-assed. Something that reuses the same bit of media is giving
      people a false sense of security.

      In this respect, a service with storage in the cloud is probably much
      better for the n00b crowd. The backups should not only be automated but
      they should also be robust. They should be carried out like corporate
      backups should be (or at least stored robustly with RAID6 and whatnot).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  59. Simplified? by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    I hear that it looks like this when you start it up. It might look simple, but you can do anything.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  60. Novice User by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    By novice user I assume they mean the average user - I'll take 4 for my family ...

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  61. Just tell them not to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, it is that simple.

    You need to share documents? Ask them to use Google Docs.

    Shockwave? What is that exactly? Where it is used? I can open all the videos in the web with abandon, unless some platform tries to reinvent the wheel for nefarious selfish purposes.

  62. Shades of Minitel by thethibs · · Score: 1

    This can't be a coincidence. "Alex" was the name of a Videotext dumb terminal service, a copy of the French Minitel, fielded by Bell Canada back in the 80's.

    Like this "Alex" the target market was ordinary people who didn't know anything about computers and didn't want to. It failed miserably.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  63. The *worst* part of this product by ConversantShogun · · Score: 1

    I just read through the comments, and I don't think anybody picked up on the worst part of this product: As far as I can tell from the website, this is a computer with Linux installed, but programmed to require access to the Broadband Computer Company's servers in order to operate. What happens if that company goes belly-up? All those "non-tech savvy" people then get to realize they've bought what (to them) is a brick.

    In order to login, you need a "latchkey" (USB dongle of some kind). This latchkey is actually a subscription. If you have others in your family that will use the computer, you can buy additional latchkey subscriptions. I can't imagine anything more insulting to the very idea of owning a personal computer!

    --

    --When you buy proprietary software, you don't get better software. What you get is the right to complain about it.
  64. Re:Give it to newborns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awww... It isn't so hard to for people to pick up GNU/Linux. Most of what they learned in MS Windows translates to GNU/Linux. You just have to let them KNOW that the things about GNU/Linux and/or adapt GNU/Linux to meet the needs of people familiar with MS Windows. Now that might mean defaulting to .doc format, auto-redirecting to GNU/Linux friendly versions for software people go to like AIM- but for GNU/Linux like Pidgin, and a quick introduction to the user interface. How do you shut the computer down, get to your applications, and what do you do if you need to install a program designed for Microsoft Windows? Cover those topics and your pretty much set. Then just give them an toll-free support number and tell them that whenever someone tells them something can't be done or isn't supported that chances are they are wrong and that the company isn't the ones who are supporting it. Rather the company providing support is the PC manufacturer. And that actually makes things easier because now you aren't dealing with 3 different companies to get support. You are dealing with just one.

  65. Re:Give it to newborns by nurd68 · · Score: 1

    I always turned in PDFs generated in LaTeX. I got points because mine were visibly easier to read (better font rendering and layout) than Office at the time (2000-ish).

    There are modern tools which make using LaTeX to do documents even more nicer. Where I had input, output + perl glueing it together, now there are IDE-type setups, with completion, etc.

  66. Re:Give it to newborns by flabordec · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it will suck if they start charging, fortunately it does not seem that way.

    Apparently:

    It's far more likely that the line in the report was referring to new subscription-based features, such as the PSP rental service or one of SOE's upcoming MMOs.

    --
    "I see undead people" Warcraft III - Necromancer
  67. Re:Give it to newborns by bjartur · · Score: 1

    But RMS said that consoles were EVIL!

    But e.g. EVE Online works on Linux, right?