Slashdot Mirror


iPhone's Liquid Sensors Can Be Triggered By Wintertime Use

An anonymous reader writes "The Polish website Moje Jabluszko ran an experiment that proves the poor reliability of the liquid contact indicators (original, in Polish) installed by Apple in the iPhone. They performed three different tests to challenge the LCIs, which they recorded as a movie. They decided to mimic regular usage of the iPhone — meaning, you go outside where it could be cold or warm, then move inside in a building where temperature might be dramatically different, but still within covered conditions. So, they placed the iPhone in its box for one hour outside at -11 C, then moved it inside at room temperature for 24 hours. They repeated the experiment 3 times, and after the third cycle they could show that the LCI located in the audio jack plug started turning red! This is a clear proof that LCIs are not reliable and could turn red while the iPhone has been used under the defined environmental requirements defined by Apple. Here, only the condensing water could have been in contact with the sensor. In other words, even moving in and out during regular winter time will make you iPhone LCI turn red!" (In the tech specs for the iPhone, Apple rates the non-operating temperature range as -20 to 45 C.)

14 of 484 comments (clear)

  1. Doubly unreliable by samurphy21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We do a lot of service on macbooks at work, and there's been times when we've taking a unit in for service that "won't turn on" and the user "has no idea why", only to find out they're drippy inside, and none of the liquid sensors are tripped.

    1. Re:Doubly unreliable by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think Orwell has anything to do with putting a sensor strip that turns color if you dunk the computer in water, clearly in violation of the warranty. So, while it may be kind of a dick move, its not some secret authoritarian plot of doom.

    2. Re:Doubly unreliable by LtGordon · · Score: 5, Funny

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      I can't quite figure out if this is flamebait, or if I'm just the only person who can't make a connection between liquid sensors in a consumer electronic device and a dystopian police state. If a liquid sensor bothers you so much, I hate to be the one to tell you, but ... don't turn your iPhone around ... there's even a camera!

      So, no, to answer your question: it doesn't seem to bother me a bit.

    3. Re:Doubly unreliable by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Insightful

      According to some of the other posts on here, it seems like Apple has already covered this in the warranty agreement by specifying that the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate.

      That's not an enforceable clause anywhere I know of. The iPhone is marketed as a portable phone, among other things. It's not portable if you can't take it into environments people commonly go into. Ergo, this all falls under the implied warranty of fitness for purpose.

      Good luck fighting for it when Apple has "evidence" against you.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    4. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And where is this going to end? Is the device going to keep a permanent record of its GPS coordinates and accelerometer readings? Is Apple going to start recording all the sounds around the phone to make sure that it wasn't used in the commission of a crime?

      It doesn't end - Apple is the reflection of Steve Jobs, and Steve Jobs is a control freak. That's not necessarily a bad thing, so long as everyone that buys Apple products understands that to be the case, and accepts it: So long as you're content to let Apple tell you what's best for you with regards to those things that you buy from them, then you'll be fine, happy and content. And, for the majority of those that buy Apple products, that will be the case.

      Apple has done an admirable job of creating a controlled computing environment, after all. They control the hardware, the OS, and so the software that runs on top of it. There's MUCH to be said for this approach - overall stability is greatly improved, for the most part. The "end user experience" is mostly consistent, which lends itself to ease of use and so, Apple customers are, for the most part happy: All they want is for their computers to "just work", and for the most part, that's what they get.

      Apple has taken this approach, and applied it successfully to the iPod, iTunes, the iPhone - every time they branch out, they use the same methodology: Create an enticing product over which they have complete control, forever, make it fashionable, stylish, *the* thing to have. Apple is cool, after all, and so, too, are those that buy Apple products.

      They've carefully cultivated this image, and gained a loyal, in some cases, fanatical, following.

      And I say, with no cynicism at all - GOOD for them! There's obviously a market for this approach, and they should milk it for as much money as they can.

  2. Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LCI are just a way for companies to worm out of actually delivering on warranties.

    1. Re:Scam by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah mod that up. The liquid sensors don't protect the devices in any way, other than to let you know you got the thing wet at some point. Many warranties are basically written to rule out the common things that would break a phone. It's especially annoying when you're paying a monthly fee for the warranty that adds up to the price of the phone or more in a year anyway, the least they could do is replace the thing when you break it even if you did drop it in your gin and tonic. If they make you agree that's not covered, fine, but then their sensors better be rock solid reliable. False positives are unacceptable.

  3. Only -20C?? by onosson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow - why do they even sell them here in Canada, then? Am I not supposed to take it outside below -20C? That's almost every night for half the winter! In fact, though, I've had my iPod Touch (1st Gen) for about 3 years, and I take and *use* it outdoors in -30 to -20 temperatures all the time - no problem. It's actually survived a dunking in the bathtub, too.

    --
    ? syntax error
  4. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The environment the phone was in was noncondensing. The environment IN the phone was condensing but how is the consumer to control that?

    Consumer devices need to be built to withstand the normal environments they will be used in. Surprise, people sometimes come into a warm building from the cold outside.

    If Apple gave half a crap about their users, they'd spring for the penny it would cost to shoot the insides with a bit of waterproofing spray rather than warranty void excuses before welding the back on.

  5. Re:Condensation? by marcansoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't break. The article isn't about breaking, it's about the environmental change triggering the sensors. The ramifications are that Apple may/will refuse warranty service if they have been triggered, even if the failure was not a consequence of the humidity/condensation.

    So you take your phone out on a cold day, bring it back in, then three months later it dies of natural causes. Apple refuses to fix it because some condensation occurred three months prior.

    Although it's rare for a device to die just from some slight condensation, it's technically outside the specification. The way the warranty is worded, though, it would appear that they can only refuse to service devices for actual damage caused by the out-of-spec environment, not just because the device ever was in that environment. However, the burden of proving that the condensation didn't cause the issue is probably on you.

  6. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by dmomo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> While it's true that some portion of your customers are going to lie when they say there has been no water intrusion, including, at extra cost a device aimed at proving that your customer is lying on every device is unfair. Let alone close to the external extremedies of the device.

    Well said. Good contribution to the thread.

    >> Here's a prediction: First they will deny the problem, and try to cast doubt on the testing methodolgy, then they will acknowledge the problem but claim that it only occurs in a very limited set of circumstances and offer restitution but only for those who complain loudest.

    Decent editorial insight. The kind of thing that sparks great conversation.

    >> Then they'll make a minor change that doesn't actually fix the problem and claim it is fixed (oh and raise prices to cover this change). They'll stall at every step. This seems to be right out of the Apple customer service manual, and they're not the only ones (but they are some of the worst). No different to scratchable iPod minis, or cracked laptop cases.

    Still decent, but you're starting to get worked up!

    >> Fucking horseshit.

    Yep. You're working yourself up, son!

    >> But it's Apple, it just works, right? Come on fanbois, mod me into oblivion. I don't give a shit.
    And then you just slide down hill. If you were to be modded down, I don't think it'd have been because of your opinions / insights above. It's the fact that you seem to be asking for it right here. Maybe you're proud of your dissent and want to think the comments are controversial? Sorry, no. They grabbed my attention and got me thinking. But now I've forgotten everything you've said because of your silly little outburst.

  7. Re:What are the sensors made of? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe the sensor is 3M Material 5559, which is a kind of humidity indicator. Wiki says, that these are usually made from Cobalt(II) chloride, which in pure form turns from blue to red powder by absorbing water.

    Either that or the phone is pregnant.

  8. Re:non-operating temperature range... by WizardX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The specs say differently:

    Environmental requirements

    Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F
    (0 to 35 C)
    Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F
    (-20 to 45 C)
    Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
    Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

    You have got to be kidding me!!!

    *Minimum* operating temp of 32 F?!?!?!

    How the F can they sell this phone in northern climates? I live in WI and in Feb I will frequently go outside on a nice day to take a conf call and get some fresh air. A nice day being, at least, in the upper 20's.

    Seriously dude, WTF?

    /First /. post in like 5 years
    //Apple makes some very nice products, but their arrogance is huge.
    ///Jobs was born is SW WI.

  9. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the Nokia N900 user's guide:

    Do not store the device in high or cold temperatyre. High temperatures can shorten the life of electronic devices, damage batteries, and warp or melt certain plastics. When the device warms to its normal temperature from a cold temperature, moisture can form inside the device and damage electronic circuit boards.

    Avoid extreme temperatures. Always try to keep the battery between 59F and 77F (15C and 25C). Extreme temperatures reduce the capacity and lifetime of the battery. A device with a hot or cold battery may not work temporarily. Battery performance is particularly limited in temperatures well below freezing.

    Perhaps Finnish winters aren't as frigid as I was led to believe.