Slashdot Mirror


Perth Game Company CEO Takes IP By Night

snicho99 writes "A US owned gaming company has fled Australia, leaving unpaid employees and a massive tax bill. Apparently many staff have been working unpaid for months to allow their game to ship and hopefully the company to recover. Interzone's Perth (Western Australia) office was created with the assistance of a state government grant. Last week Interzone's (American) CEO entered the building at night and removed all the servers and IP so that Interzone could continue production at a new company they have opened in Ireland. The staff caught him on camera. More background here."

70 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Call wikipedia by bl8n8r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a new poster child available for the "ConnivingBastard PrickManager" definition.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:Call wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dont' power lines runs reverse in Perth so he ca't use their servers in northern Ireland? If so he has to pay for all the shipment so he's out some spooners, ay mattey?

    2. Re:Call wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are thinking of the toilet bowls. Those run backward.

    3. Re:Call wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, yuck. I prefer my toilets to flush the shit out of my house not into it.

    4. Re:Call wikipedia by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      up is down in Australia

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:Call wikipedia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't such a big deal.

      Here in the US, we've had entire industries do this to their workers. It's called "free-market capitalism" writ large.

      The only interesting thing is that Interzone did this to technology workers.

      Maybe it's time the techies realized that they are working class and not the professional class many have thought of themselves. And management really is out to fuck you over.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Call wikipedia by Nursie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find that attitude patronising in the extreme. Many more than 1% are engineers. Engineering practice is defied by the discipline not some god of engineering and there are many good sets of practices in the industry.

      Personally, I design and implement high throughput, low latency server software that deals with mission critical data and/or financial transactions. I consider myself an engineer. Please don't pull out either of the old fallacies that engineers are either personally, legally, responsible for any failing in their work (demonstrably untrue in civil or other engineering firms where the company may be responsible but the individual is not) or that "you're an engineer when the thing you designed kills someone if it goes wrong" because that puts many electronic engineers in the "not engineer" camp and many software guys in the engineer camp.

      Is every programmer a "Software Engineer"? I don't know, but I dislike the dismissive attitude.

    7. Re:Call wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's refreshing to see an American CEO that actually knows enough about his own company to know what to steal.

    8. Re:Call wikipedia by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, it's interesting that the manager showed up and seized the equipment without an opportunity for employees to clear personal data or office possessions. That's pretty unusual.

      I've seen small companies closing their doors under different, but similarly awful circumstances. (Power being cut, losing their network feed due to non-payment, unpaid-for equipment being seized, etc.) An important rule for employees facing such troubles is to make sure you have all legal documents in off-site backup. Follow your contracts, but make sure your payment records, stock information, signed contracts, etc. are available offline. And consider whether to back up your work and email offsite or on separate media: I've actually been offered a return consulting job to come back and reconstruct work that I'd done and they'd deleted all source code for, as part of purging my old accounts. Since I;d been there as a corporate partner, and they tried to pay me under the table and not notify my company, I contacted our sales and legal departments. It turned out they hadn't paid six months of outstanding bills, and hiring me behind my company's back would have been much cheaper for them and much more profitable for me, but would have left my employer with much less leverage to get paid.

      Fortunately for me, the key work I'd done had actually already been submitted to the relevant open source project's main codelines, so it wasn't lost. And they hadn't noticed the explanations in my contract about what working on GPL tools nad publishing them to that client meant, that they were under GPL. We actually managed to get them to cough up at least some of the backpay, mostly for explaining where to to get the updates.

    9. Re:Call wikipedia by u38cg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interestingly, this is almost exactly what the US headquarters of Lehman Brothers did immediately before the collapse - repatriated all the cash from overseas operations to pay US staff and creditors before anyone else.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    10. Re:Call wikipedia by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're giving all types of engineers too much credit. Cars with no brakes, VCR's that eat video tapes, potholes, phones that can't operate in normal weather, bridges that fall in, exploding spacecraft, leaning towers... All types of engineers are every bit as much crap as you think software engineers are. They just get a lot more credit because they've been crap longer. But I'm not bitter...

    11. Re:Call wikipedia by jonadab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Here in the US, we've had entire industries do this to their
      > workers. It's called "free-market capitalism" writ large.

      Umm, except for the part about never paying them a dime for hours they already worked. The DOL would be all over them if they tried that one.

      Moving the business overseas on short notice and leaving them all out of a job with no warning? Yeah, that part's totally legal, assuming the workers were employed in the standard at-will fashion. (Some workers do have contracts with their employers that disallow this, but that's a special case.)

      But you do have to pay them for the hours they already worked.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:Call wikipedia by ChinggisK · · Score: 2, Informative

      (demonstrably untrue in civil or other engineering firms where the company may be responsible but the individual is not)

      Uh, what? Dead wrong for civil firms at least, I'm quite certain that a certified Professional Engineer that is found guilty of negligence can both get fined by his state's PE organization and/or lose his license (aka tens of thousands of dollars a year in salary) - here's a source for you. IANAL so I wouldn't know the details about being personally sued but I've heard many stories about it happening. From my understanding PE's are COMPLETELY responsible and liable for drawings they sign off on; that's why they get paid the big bucks.

    13. Re:Call wikipedia by Yevoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An increasing number of programmers over the years have started calling themselves engineers, and it truly bothers me. This source of ire came to a head 2 years ago when I needed to hire engineers that also knew how to program. Being in Seattle, 99% of the applicants advertised themselves as engineers, and while many of them were intelligent and very well versed in programming principles and practices, not a single one of them knew anything about what would be learned in engineering school.

      Here are some examples of interviewing questions I made to lend understanding of the distinction I had to make between programmers and engineers:
      What is a Fourier (or Laplace) transform?
      What is a convolution?
      What is an RMS mean compared to an average?
      What is a duty cycle?
      How do you apply Kirchoff's law to a circuit?
      What is the time constant of an RC circuit, and what does it mean?
      What is the resonance frequency of an RLC circuit?
      What is the nyquist frequency?
      What does a PID controller do?
      What is a normal force?
      What is Colomb's Law?
      What conditions are needed to change 2 sandwiched diodes into a transistor?
      Explain what a conduction band is.
      What is a triple point for a material?
      What happens to the orbitals of atoms as they are brought closer together?
      How can you make steel conduct heat better, and what are the drawbacks?
      What is metal fatigue on the micro or nanoscopic level?
      What is Newton's Law of Cooling?
      What does the Reynolds number tell you?
      What is a Carnot engine and why is it special?
      What should the flow velocity be directly on a surface experiencing laminar flow?

      Programmers had a higher chance of answering the few questions at the top compared to the bottom, but one thing was painfully clear: those who had learned engineering knew most of the answers, and programmers calling themselves engineers usually knew none. This particular list covers many disciplines, but this list actually covers what you'd need to know as a COMPUTER ENGINEER to pass the fundamentals of engineering exam. Computer Scientists simply do not learn an engineering background to have this kind of knowledge.

      As a practicing engineer that has seen programmers severely injure people, blow up objects, and burn circuitry due to their lack of engineering knowledge, the fundamental distinction I draw between an engineer and programmer is that a programmer mostly deals with concepts and ideas entirely created by humans, where engineers are forced to understand and deal with nature itself on an everyday basis.

      To clarify this point, I usually liken programmers to mathematicians: Good ones are usually scientists and have to constantly utilize the scientific method to get their job done, and their work is constantly invoked by the world on a regular basis, but generally their work routinely deals with abstractions and hierarchies, and they can do their job quite well without understanding how the physical world works. Indeed, some of the best programmers I've ever known have built amazingly efficient "engines" without ever knowing how the physical components they rely upon are designed or operate on a physical level.

      I will grudingly admit that there clearly is a fuzzy line between engineer and programmer, but it falls squarely within the Computer Engineering discipline. Some of us "code" in hardware, where the chip physics is our syntax, making us much more in the engineering camp, and some of us move entirely into the machine/instruction language regime, where an understanding of the computer science of creating an abstract algorithm and less of the physics come more into play, making those of us closer to computer science. By the time you get beyond chips reading machine language, the man-made abstract meaning of the 1s and 0s are what fill your mind entirely, leaving the physics to someone else, and that science of crafting a decently run representation is called programming.

      The fact that you could go on to craft entire systems using black boxes that operate as you command means that while your efforts are certainly complex and necessary, it is not engineering.

      --
      AccountKiller
    14. Re:Call wikipedia by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A true capitalist would not have started such a company off a government grant, nor would their workers continued working for no pay.

      Perhaps not, but he almost certainly would have hidden behind the government's apron by incorporating in order to keep his employees from holding him personally liable, even when his actions resulted in a loss for them.

      It's laughable when people talk about "capitalism" but then still demand the government protect them from the consequences of their own bad decisions.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    15. Re:Call wikipedia by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but the professional engineering licensing/certifying organizations do not have a trademark on the word engineer, and the word has been around longer then the said organizations. Software engineers don't call themselves Certified/Licensed Professional Engineers, so I don't see the problem. Certified/Licensed Professional Engineer != engineer and engineer != Certified/Licensed Professional Engineer.

      --
      Software Inventor
    16. Re:Call wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cool, a quiz!

      What is a Fourier (or Laplace) transform?

      A certain linear transform that maps function points to orthogonal set of functions that self-convolve onto itself and to "zero" with others.

      What is a convolution?

      For finite signals, draw a signal using another as a "brush", adding up the overlapping parts :)
      Alternatively, multiply the corresponding frequencies. The integral definition is a bit backwards with that pesky minus sign.

      What is an RMS mean compared to an average?

      Something totally different. RMS represents energy. Average just position.

      What is a duty cycle?
      How do you apply Kirchoff's law to a circuit?
      What is the time constant of an RC circuit, and what does it mean?
      What is the resonance frequency of an RLC circuit?

      No idea.

      What is the nyquist frequency?

      The maximum width of frequency band that be reproduced correctly from sampled signal. Or half of it if you go complex and consider negative frequencies too.

      What does a PID controller do?
      What is a normal force?

      Umm.. force minus tangent force? :)

      What is Colomb's Law?
      What conditions are needed to change 2 sandwiched diodes into a transistor?
      Explain what a conduction band is.
      What is a triple point for a material?

      Heat/pressure combination where three phases meet.

      What happens to the orbitals of atoms as they are brought closer together?

      They become quantized due to pauli exclusion principle bringing the matter into degenerate state?

      How can you make steel conduct heat better, and what are the drawbacks?
      What is metal fatigue on the micro or nanoscopic level?
      What is Newton's Law of Cooling?
      What does the Reynolds number tell you?

      Something about when the flow becomes turbulent but the exact definition is faint.

      What is a Carnot engine and why is it special?
      What should the flow velocity be directly on a surface experiencing laminar flow?

      Constant?

      Okay, I fail. Now let's try some counterquestions:

      What does it mean for something to be NP-complete?
      What is the golay code?
      What is the hotelling transform?
      How would you apply it on statistics?
      Explain the difference between O() and o().
      What is the busy beaver function and what makes it special?
      What is the finite element method?
      Why are denormals needed and what are the practical downsides?
      What is a deadlock? Can you avoid it?
      What does abstraction elimination mean?
      How do you parallelize an adder?
      How can you make password hashes secure against precalculated look-up tables?
      What is the relationship with BWT and the Psi-function?

      Okay, I wasn't actually arguing against your point. Just pouring gasoline onto the tough engineers vs. wimpy programmers war:)

      However, mathematically I don't see much difference between engineering and good software engineering. Sure, it's working with black boxes, but if you just.. abstract the black box into a parameter you get a pure box that works with any black boxes as long as they function within specifications :)

    17. Re:Call wikipedia by radish · · Score: 5, Informative

      I always think it's hysterical when American engineers get so up in arms about "mere" programmers daring to call themselves engineers. In the UK, the status of Chartered Engineer is given to trained, professional engineers in many disciplines. Each discipline has it's own professional body who are permitted to issue the certification, and guess what? The BCS (British Computer Society) are one of those bodies, and can award CEng status to suitably qualified people. There's no mention of having to understand Newtonian Mechanics as a prerequisite...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    18. Re:Call wikipedia by Raptoer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So basically you wanted a super engineer that could do everything for you?

      At my college there are at least a dozen different types of engineers. What exactly is 'engineering school' anyways? a structural engineer wouldn't know what a PID controller is or how to change 2 sandwiched diodes into a transistor.

      I can't tell from your questions if you want a materials engineer or a computer engineer...

      I think the problem is that your job description was too general.

      Engineers take a real world problem or a variation on a real world problem and come up with a solution. Scientists figure out the laws that govern physical phenomenon. Mathematicians stare at a bunch of stuff and magically (ok not really) come up with ideas that help both engineers and scientists.

      Electrical engineers come up with new components.
      Computer engineers come up with chips and boards that use these new components.
      Computer scientists come up with algorithms to use these new chips and boards.
      Software engineers come up with programs to solve real world problems using these new algorithms.

      For me the key difference between a programmer and a software engineer is the parts of the solution that they come up with.

      A software engineer takes the customer's problem, determines what exactly they want, writes a spec, designs the system, implements their design with sufficient documentation, goes through all the testing including security testing, shows the customer, and goes back to implementation/design until they get what exactly the customer wants.

      A programmer might be able to design, and can probably implement the design without sufficient documentation, and MIGHT be able to test it properly.

      So programming is a sub-discipline of software engineering.

      Kind of what a carpenter is to a structural engineer. Except the structural engineer is also the carpenter (but there's also a lot of other carpenters working with him).

      You asked for an 'engineer with programming experience' You should have asked for a computer engineer... I think... I can't even tell what you want.

      Engineering has nothing to do with physical components, it's just that until software most problems were solved with physical objects.

    19. Re:Call wikipedia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also I'm not sure how much sympathy I have for anyone whose paycheck for a full year and a half consisted entirely of hopes and dreams.

      You sound like you're ready to be in management.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Call wikipedia by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't know why you were modded down for that, it's exactly right. It's not exactly bad news either: we own our own means of production (both soft and hardware) and have access to the marketplace. Basically the first time in history this has happened since medieval peasants were able to augment their income by producing handicrafts on their own looms. Ideologies have been formed and revolutions fought to put the means of production back into the hands of the people and here we are in that very position. People can keep their victorian megalomaniacal "engineer" titles, I'm more excited to be part of the new tradesmen class.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    21. Re:Call wikipedia by TikiTDO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I whole-heartedly disagree with your definition of an engineer, and what knowledge is required to be called one. You seem to view engineers as someone very well versed in material sciences. For instance, you state that using "black boxes" to design a system precludes you from being an engineer, because these boxes operate as you command. However, just because you can assume more of these boxes than you could in the physical realm does not mean there are no rules to consider, nor does it imply that those rules are any simpler than those you see in physics. They are just different.

      I am not too surprised though, as I am surrounded by numerous traditional engineers that insist on calling me a "mere" programmer because I am satisfied by learning the key elements of their fields, which I will then use in my own designs. These same people have such a poor understanding of what it really means to *design* software, that I am forced to cringe every time I must go through their work.

      And yes, I did finish a fully accredited engineering school, and have an engineering degree. Also, while I could answer many of the questions (though some only after popping open a book or two), I do not view such knowledge as definitive of the profession. Instead, I think of engineering as a state of mind, and a set of beliefs and values that encourages you to learn, though not necessarily master many fields in order to ensure your designs are the best they can be. Whether you designs are in the area of materials, circuits, or programs, there is always more to consider than what you see. I feel that suggesting that something stops being an engineer just because he works with things you cannot touch or feel is insulting to the very name of the profession you claim to practice.

    22. Re:Call wikipedia by MacWiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that this tendency to call yourself something you're not comes in part from employers' expectations.

      I'm seeing people asking for web designers with 2-year degrees and multi-year experience in Twitter (seriously, I've seen it) to maintain a virtually static page. I can imagine that if they wanted a chemist, they'd require a Nobel Prize.

      I do (or did) Mac applications. No school teaches that except Apple. I learned by slogging through Pascal, C and C++, and by reading every volume of Inside Macintosh, something that the guys at Microsoft never did before 1995 or they would have known how to make a window with fucking scroll bars in FoxPro for the Mac. (They told me to use graphics to simulate a scrolling window. That was the day I stopped using Microsoft products.)

      I sat through a semester of computer science at 35, but it was so outdated (and not a single prof on campus understood the Apple toolbox) that any degree would have been just a piece of paper, as it would not signify any knowledge gained, much less anything that would be applicable in the real world. The classes seemed more designed to merely get people to think in a logical manner. The final exam was something I could have done on the first day.

      Not having 3-1/2 more years to waste, I quit school and went to work as a Mac programmer. Took a week to find a job.

      We all know there are lots of people out there writing bad/buggy/dangerous/insecure software that were hired because of a degree, and are still rather incompetent because they still don't think logically enough to see peripheral consequences or anticipate/test user error factors, for instance.

      They're not competent software engineers, but they have a piece of paper. I don't have a piece of paper, but I can make something that works properly.

      Without trying to tell a story about the software I already did (Basketball stats, school free lunch program tracking, inventory database for Motorola, complete custom business accounting software), how many free-standing applications does one have to develop from scratch for different clients, according to their specs, before one can safely assume that they are a software engineer?

      Or is it enough that your clients know that you engineered theirs?

      As for the list of facts that all engineers should know...

      Software engineering is not physical engineering. Software engineering is about making a piece of software that solves a problem, performs a function or deals with data in the desired manner. We're not building computers, we're writing software to operate within the restrictions already in place as a result of hardware choice. So we don't really need to know much about metal fatigue on the micro or nanoscopic level.

      If we do, we look it up, code in the formula, test the calculations and forget it until the next time someone wants to ask their software about metal fatigue. But software will not change the metal fatigue of the computer housing it.

      Most people just want to keep track of stuff. Especially money. Nothing ever explodes, except perhaps incompetent managers who have been fudging records.

      As for black boxes, that rules out Windows and Mac interfaces entirely doesn't it? The entire difference between the two is that Mac has actual engineers hard-code the chips with these instructions, whereas Microsoft likes to keep the Windows interface more fluid so it can disable compting products. If I ask for a new window and one shows up, is it really necessary for me to grok the machine code that produced it, or can I move on to teaching it how to process payroll for 100 employees?

  2. CEOs are better people than we are by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Funny

    A CEO may pay what His he wishes to His employees and take what He wants.
    By His accumulation wealth, a CEO has demonstrated His worldly talent and divine favor. Far be it for us to criticize His actions: are we yet men, while He has a golden MBA? While we merely use our power of Speech, does the CEO not expand the language with outflowing of His prodigious mind? Does that not giveth unto him wisdom we know not, and authority we dare not assert?

    We should open our hearts to the CEO. We shall work for Him all our waking hours and offer unto him our wives and daughters for His amusement: for we should be honored to have a radiant Being in our lives as the prime-most consideration.

    Should we Fail, we deserve whatever punishment the CEO shall mete out for He, as he so frequently reminds us, is infallible. If a CEO's Company should fail, it is our fault for being indolent, and we shall bear that around our necks. All the remaining resources of a failed Company will go to its CEO as compensation for even attempting to deal with filty being like ourselves. Amen.

    1. Re:CEOs are better people than we are by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can talk like that when we nail a CEO to a cross.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:CEOs are better people than we are by MMC+Monster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why stop at one?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  3. Re:Other countries are interesting by fractoid · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember that it's not so bad to leave a country to do business elsewhere. When I worked in Naples, I would not get almost any pay. Yes, I was a kid and I was supposed to work for my father, but I wanted something off from it. If it doesn't work like you want to, you go somewhere where it does.

    It IS so bad when you use a bunch of legal dodgery to take ownership of the IP while evading the millions of dollars of debt that you owe to the staff. It IS bad when you break a whole bunch of laws to get that IP out of the country, so you can start another studio in another country without actually paying what you owe to any of your employees. And (personal conjecture here) it IS bad when you will most likely you will do exactly the same to the new studio.

    Disclaimer: IAAFIZE. I am a former IZ employee.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  4. Internet hate campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are times when internet hate campaigns get well out of hand, and end up causing huge amounts of trouble for people over trivial or non-existent issues.

    This is not one of those times... Take it away, internet...

  5. There is much more to this than the Summary states by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interzone owns the Australia Tax Office (ATO) approximately $1m AUD and $500k in unpaid wages and superannuation. The owner changed the locks on the firm at 4am in the morning, locking all employees out from their work. Not even given a chance to collect their personal belongings. A new 'Interzone' called Big Collision is being setup in Dublin Ireland to complete development of their game Futebol in time for the World Cup, and without the debt they have accumulated in Australia. Originally Interzone was given a grant by the Western Australian goverment of $500k, so this has blown up very big on the news there, causing quite some political issues and questions of the chief Treasurer. They did not even lay off the staff, as that would of caused paper work, and the paying out of their due wages and redundancy money. They were simple locked out from their building.
    The firm that provides the middleware (BigWorld) based in Sydney, provided a server engineer (contracted by Mike to clear out the IP assets from the server.)

    The Interzone employees have been fantastic, in collecting evidence, and staying together to fight for what they are due.

    This is not the first time this has occured in Australia, similar shit has happened in the last year with firms Transmission, and Fuzzyeyes. Video games, one of the last places for cow-boy businessmen.

    For people who would like to read more on this, check these links:
    http://www.tsumea.com/australasia/australia/news/120210/interzone-games-perth-closes-staff-locked-out
    http://www.kotaku.com.au/2010/02/wa-dev-interzone-games-close-to-liquidation/
    http://www.kotaku.com.au/2010/02/interzone-ceo-marty-brickey-responds/
    And this video where the employees confront one of the directors http://vimeo.com/9574704

  6. Trading while insolvent. by deniable · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this guy is a director and knowingly traded while insolvent / unable to pay the bills, he's looking at five years in prison. Once ASIC gets done, the ATO will start looking at tax issues. This guy is going to be a bureaucrat chew toy.

    1. Re:Trading while insolvent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ASIC were fully aware what was going on. I'm afriad to tell you as an Australian citizen who BEGGED ASIC to take action, that ASIC are a bunch of pussies and toothless tigers.

      John Howard and the former Liberal Government watered down ASIC's powers to the point that they are nothing more than a wasteful public entity paying lip service - they only care about the "big fish" that they cannot ignore (due to press coverage), and as recent media coverage over the last six months has shown, they can't even catch people like One.Tel and Firepower.

      ASIC is a toothless tiger. Tell your MP.

      That's the only way things will change.

  7. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by nibbles2004 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Australia has never been part of Asia, it part of the Australian continent

  8. A previous irrelevant quote by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Er, no, RTFS - he removed the servers.

    This is the one time that referring to "IP theft" actually makes sense. He stole it, removing the original rather than duplicating.

    Do people who commit piracy do so by going to the record companies at night, sneaking in, and removing their CDs?

    Anyhow, where does anyone accuse him of stealing? Or are you just making up a straw man?

  9. Re:A previous quote seen here on slashdot by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the way I see it, the quote is completely right, even in this case.

    The "IP" is irrelevant. The employees are owed for the time they worked, and nothing more. Even if you believe there is such a thing as "IP", the employees agreed it belongs to the company when they signed the contract, so it can't be "stolen" from them.

    Having the CEO fire everybody and have another team continue development would have been perfectly legal. The only illegal thing is not paying the previous employees all they were owed.

  10. Re:Other countries are interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that he's moving is not the problem. The problem is that his staff have been working unpaid in order for the company to recover.

    I don't see what the problem is: If they worked unpaid by choice, then they're foolish, in my not so humble opinion, and here's why: Having been cheated before, I'd not trust even family or friends when it comes to my financial future, and certainly not an employer.

    Work for free? Sorry, been there, done that, much in the same way as these people: I trusted the company's owner, believed him when he said that he'd reward me and the rest of us, if we were only patient and worked hard. It would all work out in the end, you see, and everyone would end up wealthy.

    Yeah, right. The only person that ended up wealthy was him - he sold the company, and the people that had worked to build it up got nothing, and had no recourse, as we had nothing in writing.

    As the saying goes: "Once burned, twice shy". I'm older now, and considerably more cynical, and I don't work for any employer for free, ever. The only thing that we have is our lives, and we cannot know how much time we have: Giving it away to an employer without recompense is foolish at best, because they never remember the sacrifices you made for them, and you can never get that time back.

    Always keep that in mind when dealing with an employer: You're trading your life in exchange for money. Make sure that it's worth it to you, don't ever be surprised when someone tries to cheat you and don't let them do so.

  11. Re:A previous quote seen here on slashdot by slarrg · · Score: 2, Funny

    In addition, he intends to sell copies of this CD.

  12. Re:Other countries are interesting by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > The problem is that his staff have been working unpaid in order for the company to recover.

    But that's retarded. They had little reason to do that other than some profoundly misplaced loyalty - they're apparently employees not company partners? Of course I may not be getting the full story, but working for someone without being paid and without keeping the result of your work (i.e. open source, in fact the whole reason open source makes economic sense is because you keep the fruits of your labor and other people also having copies doesn't diminish that) is dumb.

    Well, working for free does make sense if you expect to get the money later. Basically they've given the company a loan. It turned out the company owner was not credit-worthy, though.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. What? by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Last week Interzone's (American) CEO entered the building at night and removed all the servers and IP so that Interzone could continue production at a new company they have opened in Ireland. The staff caught him on camera.

    As much as I think that Mike Turner is a total scumbag, the linked video doesn't actually show him being caught in the act of removing anything. It does show him to be consistently wearing those crappy white iPod/iPhone earbuds - but while that probably should be a crime, it isn't currently on the books.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The FULL video shows him exiting Interzone Perth Offices at around the same time a Police report was filed by employees claiming that there was someone in their building illegally, and this pattern was repeated over several days. The only way that he got away with this was by conitinuing to provide the Police with phony documentation, and quite probably by bribing the building manager of the office, who provided the Police with ammunition to keep employees off the property. It's worth noting that the past TWO building managers of the property in question were indicted for fraud in 2009.

  14. Re:Other countries are interesting by Trahloc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But that's retarded. They had little reason to do that other than some profoundly misplaced loyalty

    The only reason the loyalty was misplaced was because the CEO screwed them. Had he honored their commitment and worked as hard as possible to save the company and then paid them back dues + bonus/stock their loyalty would have been dead on. Unfortunately they worked for a douchebag. I'm the first person to have no loyalty for a large mega corp but small shops require it. We can't function without the employees giving a damn about the company and the company can't function without giving a damn about their employees.

    --
    The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  15. disgusting ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    even if he gets away with this, his new employees will probably think twice before working on unpaid wages for so long. Also, a publisher should certainly be wary of someone with such dubious business practices.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  16. Re:Other countries are interesting by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait: are we talking about a game company, or SCO?

    Oh, yes. Both.

  17. Re:Well, what do you know... by Zumbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given that the asshole fled to Ireland and started a "new" firm, the interesting question is the extradition agreement between Ireland and Australia. Unfortunately, the link to the Australia-Ireland agreement on this page links to the Australia-Indonesia page ...

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  18. Re:What the... by jonadab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it were legal, he wouldn't have been doing it in the middle of the night. The company could have just locked the employees out and done whatever they wanted in broad daylight. Plenty of companies have been known to do that sort of thing when shutting down a location.

    I mean, this is a CEO we're talking about. Those guys normally work 9-5, officially, on paper, and in practice this turns into more like 10-4, except on days when they're out of the office for "meetings" with other CEOs on the golf course. Working in the middle of the night is NOT part of the general modus operandi.

    So yeah, if he was slipping in during the wee hours, there's a reason.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  19. Re:Other countries are interesting by toriver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Game companies often hire people for whom that is their first job. They have not yet learned that companies are psychopathic abusers, and that your only loyalty is to yourself and your colleagues. Any kindness you offer to the company as such - working for no pay for instance - will never be returned by them.

  20. Re:Not nice. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He has committed tax fraud, the taxman is first in the line of creditors and has an extradition treaty with the Irish taxman. He will wake up one day in the very near future to find his bank accounts frozen.

    The employees are the last in line when it comes to the creditors of a defunct company, once the taxman and banks have split up what's left the employees will get fuck all. The best the employees can hope for is seeing the prick behind bars which IMHO is a very likely outcome.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  21. Re:Other countries are interesting by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe the saying you're looking for is:

    Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.

    - Former President Bush

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  22. Re:Not nice. by Barny · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually....

    First is the employees super funds, then taxes, then wages, then everyone else they owe money to.

    The employees are covered for loss of wages by the GEERS scheme, which they can submit and get their: Lost wages; Lost holiday pay; Redundancy payout (according to industry standards or their contract, and if contract its subject to evaluation).

    According to Australian law anyway :)

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  23. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Australia is part of Asia.

    Depending on which list of continents you go by, there are a lot of variations. The geographers, geologists, and sociologists can't seem to agree on a single definition, so it can be a bit confusing. How many continents are there, anyway? Five? Six? Seven? More?

    For instance, there are variously considered to be one, two, or three continents in the western hemisphere. Two is the most common figure, but it's not universal.

    Europe may or may not be part of the same continent as Asia. I even saw one list that makes Africa part of the same continent as Eurasia, since they're connected.

    Some lists omit Antarctica entirely, since it has no permanent inhabitants.

    But for all that, I have never seen a list that made Australia part of Asia. Usually it's a continent all by itself. Frequently it's part of a "continent" called "Oceania", which also includes most of the islands in the Pacific (but not the ones that are very close to another continent, such as Taiwan or Vancouver Island). Sometimes only a few islands are included as part of Australia -- Tasmania, New Guinea, etc. I've even seen definitions that include New Zealand as part of Australia but NOT New Guinea (which was listed as part of Asia).

    I have even seen occasional claims that Australia is an island, not part of any continent at all. (These claims generally come from laypersons and usually involve comparison to Greenland; typically the person making the assertion has been looking at Mercator-projection maps.)

    But this is the first time I have EVER seen anyone list Australia as part of Asia. That's totally unprecedented.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  24. Hard Luck by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hard luck there for all the people who just got scammed by a run of the mill business asshole. My theory is that they are all lying assholes, each and every one of them, and if you keep that in mind you'll find your dealings with them go much better. Just remind yourself as they speak that every word is carefully selected to make them richer.

    Big tip - the day you find your pay hasn't gone into your account is the day you hit jobsearch.com or call your agent and let them know you're looking for paid work.

    The business's responsibility is to ensure there is enough cash set aside against bad luck/planning/weather and enough cash flow coming through to ensure projects get completed. It's *their* responsibility, not yours...you write code, or run tests, answer the phones. If they've f*ed up enough to not have the money to even pay the people who write the product, then you have to wonder how else they are screwing up.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    1. Re:Hard Luck by supremebob · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's sad that these folks needed to learn this the hard way, but it's important to know that you need to get the hell out of a business that can't meet payroll. Start looking for a new job right away, and make sure to file a claim to the labor relations organization for that jurisdiction if you don't get your back pay in a timely manner. Paying your employees is a top priority and a legal obligation for any business, whether or not they are for-profit or non-profit. (Sad, but I have a friend who got stiffed by a church of all places)

      If a company don't have the funds available to pay it's people, they're already screwed. It's only a matter of time before they either close up shop or their creditors shut the place down at that point.

  25. Re:There is much more to this than the Summary sta by Genda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not the first time this has occurred in Australia, similar shit has happened in the last year with firms Transmission, and Fuzzyeyes. Video games, one of the last places for cow-boy businessmen.

    Actually, I belief this is a misrepresentation... I would argue that these are not "Cow-Boy Businessmen", but "Cow-Dung Businessmen". These fecal administrators, give scum of the earth a bad name. If there was any justice, they'd be plowed into a field so as to provide their only possible positive contribution to society as fertilizer.

  26. Re:Other countries are interesting by Smauler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has anyone else noticed the picture of Mike Turner with the Sphinx in the background halfway down the third page linked to in TFS? The caption below it is surely a little redundant...

  27. Re:Other countries are interesting by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You have three choices:
    1. Leave with one month of your salary unpaid and write it off as a mistake.
    2. Leave with one month of your salary unpaid, sue the company, force them to declare bankruptcy, still don't get your money, and still have to pay the court costs.
    3. Work for another month, get the product finished and get all of your back pay plus a bonus if the company makes enough money from selling the product to stay afloat.

    Which do you choose? The second option is a waste of time. The first is a guaranteed loss. The third is a gamble, where you potentially have a bigger loss, but potentially have a gain. I know people working for small businesses who have received nice bonuses for choosing option 3, and others who have had the company fold owing them back pay. If you don't have another job lined up to start immediately, it's often a good idea to try to keep the company afloat while you look for other employment as a backup.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  28. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Informative

    "We may have a ridiculous amount of asian immigrants that still speak chinese/japanese after they get here, but that still does not make us a part of asia."

    We actually have very few Japanese immigrants but they do love spending their holidays and money here, particularly in Queensland where the local economy is heavily dependent on tourisim.

    The Japanese are golf mad and a golf trip to Oz to play on a real golf course is cheaper than a golf club membership in Tokyo to play on a multi story driving range. On the whole they are very well mannered guests in our country and tend to stick to organised tour groups because of the language barrier.

    Also every chineese immigrant I have ever met speaks english, it's a requirement to get into the country unless you come in as a refugee and we do not recognise people from China as refugees.

    As you probably know there is a minority racist element in our population who idolise people such as Pauline Hanson. Hanson is ironically now emmigrating to the UK after basically being ridiculed and laughed out of politics by the rest of us. I think she is in for a shock when she finds out how many second and third generation "brown people" are wandering around the UK.

    For the non-Aussie readers, members of Hansen's minority are generally refered to as "yobbos", which when translated into American means "rednecks".

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  29. Re:There is much more to this than the Summary sta by initialE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how did it turn out at those other firms?

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  30. Re:Other countries are interesting by Atryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only reason the loyalty was misplaced was because the CEO screwed them.

    And a man's honor should know no geographic bounds, especially in this day and age. I would expect anyone considering business with this man (including anyone in Ireland, or elsewhere) to take heed and note that he is not trustworthy. I would also encourage such former employees to make the facts of the case known wide and far, as far as is possible without criminal libel or slander.

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  31. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by Atryn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Example, you would know of austudy and abstudy, these are centrelink payments you get as a student. Now, in an equal society, why are these two different systems needed, why can't aboriginal students be treated the same as white students? They receive more money and more benefits than any white man could hope for in the same situation. Call me crazy, but that is racist, against the majority.

    I don't know the Australian systems you describe but your summary makes them sound a lot like Affirmative Action here in the US. This is a tough question. There is no question that AA is prejudice and, depending on implementation, racist. However, as it is there to correct a past wrong, the hard part is deciding when it is still or no longer needed. We are struggling with this question still in the US, as evidence by the recent University of Michigan case on admissions.

    One major issue here is whether the "need" for AA is perceived to be "over" in some areas (such as the North) but the opposite in others (like the South)... I waffle a bit on this issue myself. I'd personally prefer no law or regulation mentioning race (thus invalidating AA) but that is based on the assumption that racism and inequality is no longer an issue... which is only true in some places.

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  32. Re:Not nice. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I stand corrected, apparently the scheme was brought in by the Howard government and I was using outdated personal anecdote. My brother-in-law lost ~$10K when the panel beaters he was working for in the 90's went tits up. Part of that $10K was super that had not been paid for almost a year. The bank came in and auctioned all the equipment in the shop, the employees saw none of the proceeds.

    Thanks for the education. :)

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  33. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by Cimexus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Er I'm assuming this is a troll, but just in case anyone else doesn't realise, Australia has a reasonable number of ethnically east Asian people. As in >10% of the population (and closer to >20% in some urban areas).

    Australia isn't technically in Asia, but its geographic proximity definitely affects the makeup of the population. Far more Asians per capita here than in the US, for instance.

  34. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for the thoughtful, balanced comment ... note that the perceived racial bias in the North vs the South has a lot more more to do with history than with current reality. You might be a bit closer if you differentiated urban and rural, but even that's an over-simplification.

  35. legal by DaveGod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could be mostly legal, the servers may have always been owned by the parent company and leased back to the Australian subsidiary. The IP very likely was also never owned by the Australian firm. If the subsidiary did hold assets I expect the parent company had security over them, so if they had loaned the subsidiary money then in the event of being wound up they take control of the assets. Lying to creditors/employees on the other hand, well there's a mess there but it's probably wrongful trading etc on the part of the subsidiary's directors while the parent's may or may not have known.

    It will be up to the administrator to find out if there is anything to be done, and the employees, in their position as creditors, should be applying their pressure on him. The company may have knowingly traded whilst insolvent in which case the directors may be charged with wrongful trading, and potentially be personally liable for debts. The nature of the relationship with the parent company and related transactions may also offer some scope - it's not unheard of for courts to lift the veil and treat parent & subsidiary undertakings as one entity. Furthermore he may well be able to show the parent acted as a shadow director. There is room for some optimism here for two reasons, firstly a "million dollar tax bill" implies profits (though it may be tax on salaries that hasn't been paid over). Secondly the government grant should have all sorts of covenants, you have to be an utterly incompetent complete idiot to grant or loan money to any subsidiary and not enforce appropriate covenants and security over the parent company.

    While I sympathise with the employees, there were lots of things they could have done, and given the amounts they should have taken some advice. Sure, in start-ups it's not uncommon for employees to give some leeway and "muck in". But this is a subsidiary! Why do this if there is a parent with money? Secondly, if you're a creditor, act like one. Take a look at the accounts, check for assets and file security over them. Negotiate for some equity - if they had just 20% between them minority protections kick in. An accountant probably would have given them this advice for free if they suggested that some audit fees might be coming their way later on.

  36. Re:What the... by karnal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can tell you personally that the large company CEOs don't work "10-4" - more like 24x7.... the job is their life.

    So much so that I know one that has a Plasma in his staff meeting room for when he's in on weekends to watch while working because he's ALWAYS at work.

    Sounds to me like this "CEO" is just someone who's also a con-man.

    --
    Karnal
  37. Re:Bunch of Asian Employees ? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, the seperate schemes are a hangover from affirmative action of the 70's and 80's. As I posted in my reply to walshv007 the extreme benefits that no white man could hope for amount to an extra $6.50 per week. ANY student coming from a defined remote area can also apply for rental assistance, people living in remote areas tend to be aboriginals.

    Ideologically I'm also not in favour of legislation based on race but pragmatically the aboriginals have not benifited from the so called "lucky country". Until very recently most lived in what can only be described as thrird world conditions, lost between stone age traditions and the 20th century laws.

    We also have race based legislation banning the sale of alcohol in many of the aboriginal settlements, their traditional social structures are 40kyrs old and have never had to deal with alcoholisim until the last hundred years or so. Aborigines are also permitted to hunt otherwise protected species on their reserves. IMHO these laws are a GoodThing(TM).

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  38. MOD PARENT UP!!! by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Designing and or building something does not make you an engineer! Is the guy at Quiznos as sandwich engineer because be designs sandwiches? Are you an engineer because you design computer programs? See the similarity?

    For the most part CS people have no idea what they're missing versus someone with a real engineering degree. I took classes in both Computer Science and Computer Engineering in college. The CS department was in the College of Sciences. The Computer Engineering department was in the College of Engineering. The two colleges (and their associate programs) could not have been more different. The CS program felt very much like Math or Physics. The CE program felt like EE or MechE. This is not a subtle thing...the differences permeate the students' education from day one!

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  39. IEEE by raftpeople · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you know that IEEE has a produced an ISO standard covering the knowledge required for Software Engineer?

    I'm sure that many people are mis-advertising themselves, but you also have a specific definition of what you consider an "Engineer" to be that is narrower than IEEE definitions (I'm referring to this comment: "it is not engineering").

  40. Fluid Dynamics for Computer Engineers? by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 2, Informative

    this list actually covers what you'd need to know as a COMPUTER ENGINEER to pass the fundamentals of engineering exam

    I was with you until here. My degree was in Computer Engineering, and we were never required to take fluid dynamics (Where is the Z transform in your list? In case you hadn't noticed; our controllers are all discrete since the 70's ;-). Understanding the theory behind the PID controller is something that I would look for). I'm hard pressed to see how fluid dynamics would matter outside of Mechanical Engineering? I agree with your general premise that programmers in the engineering world benifit from engineering knowledge. I work in a company that makes SCADA software, and we have a mix of people from engineering and computer-science backgrounds. Some observations. Engineers can make lousy programmers. Believe it or not, there is lot of programming theory that is important and not taught in an engineering degree. Much of the worst, most unmaintainable code I have ever seen has been written by very good engineers, who simply have no grasp of programming concepts beyond the basic. On the flip side the engineers in our team are invaluble due to their understanding of how the end-user (who are also engineers), needs to use the product to get the job done. Finally, I'd like to say that our most productive coders are guys from pure programming backgrounds. This is not to say that some of the guys from engineering backgrounds are not productive, it just seems to me that there is a particular type of person that is attracted to programming alone and can produce astonishing amounts of quality code in a short period of time. Perhaps the type of person who is attracted to engineering just isn't the conducive to this? In our company, we need the mix (and I like having the mix), but if I were creating some kind of web startup, I wouldn't employ guys with an engineering background.

  41. GEERS (all is not lost) by Macfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sympathise with the employees. I went through a similar situation in 2007.

    GEERS is your friend*, and the liquidator will help you with the information needed to complete your GEERS application. Unfortunately GEERS doesn't cover unpaid super and most companies in these circumstances just fail to pay super and accumulate fines for late super payments rather than the actual amount.

    As the law currently stands it very simple for dodgy CEO's to thieve the IP and take operations overseas. The ATO and ASIC are either too slow, bogged down with redtape or just plain toothless.

    The sad fact is CEO's/directors don't even need to move overseas. All you need to do is have a parent company overseas that the IP is assigned to. The local company then operates on the smell of an oily rag, runs up liabilities and even gets government RD grants/tax rebates. When creditors/employees come to collect, there's nothing, but a bit of office equipment and furniture. It's even possible to start a new company and then buy the salvaged office assets of the previous company and even trade from the very same office and the ATO and ASIC don't even batter an eye lid.

    *As for GEERS and the liquidator, chase them ruthlessly. The department/program is biased to the liquidators findings. If there's incomplete, incorrect or absent employee entitlement records (as is often the case with poorly run companies), GEERS will not pay you a cent, if the liquidator can't provide support or evidence of he amounts. (I found out the hard way and lost 2 years AL)

    All the best with your fight.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
  42. Tough titties? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I notice when a business owner makes off with half a mil in a assets (unpaid wages) it's tough titties but if one of the employees had done the same thing to him the frickin' justice dept extradites his ass and throws him in jail.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  43. They moved to Ireland? Bad move. by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    The management moved to Ireland? That's a bad place to go bankrupt, and a good place to sue creditors. Ireland still has bankruptcy law left over from the days when English landlords ran the country. Creditors can put a company or an individual into involuntary bankruptcy. There's nothing like "debtor in possession" bankruptcy (US "Chapter 11") in Ireland. Personal bankruptcy? The debtor may retain "such articles of clothing, household furniture, bedding, tools and equipment of his trade or profession or other necessities for himself, his wife, his children, and other dependent relatives living with him, as he may select, not exceeding in value EUR 3,175."

    It gets worse. Bankruptcies put individuals on a public blacklist. Officers of companies that go bankrupt can't be officers of a company again. Individuals can't get credit of more than EUR 630.

    The employees need to get a judgment in Australia against the CEO, which shouldn't be hard since he fled the country with unpaid employees. Then hire an aggressive collection agency in Dublin. ("100% success rate for many clients. No collection, no fee.") There are international collection agencies, such as Global Credit Solutions, with branches in 80 countries. They have offices in both Australia and Ireland.