Slashdot Mirror


Venezuela Bans Hostile Videogames and Toys

An anonymous reader writes "In an effort to 'help improve child education and prevent misconduct,' the Venezuelan government began enforcing a law on March 3rd banning war videogames and toys, imposing a fine and 2.5 years in prison on the production, distribution, sale, hiring and use of video games and toys inciting violent behavior. Alberto Federico Ravell, former director of opposing news network Globovision, has already come on twitter denouncing the authorities for seizing imported Gameboy, Wii and PlayStation 3 consoles, due to considering them violent."

16 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Story at 11 by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tinpot dictator does something stupid. Story at 11.

    1. Re:Story at 11 by pepeizquierdo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, a tinpot democratically elected president who for 11 years has been subverting all those democratic principles that allowed him to be elected in the first place. This cancer called Chavez has destroyed Venezuela's democratic institutions. His only aim is to stay in power for as long as he can. I don't think this will end well.

    2. Re:Story at 11 by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So then don't move to Venezuela?

      If you actually had a rough life you would not say that. If you have not eaten in a week violence in video games and the freedom to play them is way down on the list of shit you care about.

  2. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by wmbetts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about seize nothing, because this law is retarded.

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
  3. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by alexborges · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a gamer talking to a parent I ask you: WHy in hell do you want ME to suffer for YOU to educate YOUR CHILD in whichever way YOU decide?

    Do I violent gamer have a say in how you educate your children? Then why do you advocate in favor of people telling ME how to educate MINE?

    --
    NO SIG
  4. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a parent I applaud the effort.

    You are the embodiment of everything that is wrong with actions and laws such as these. It is not the governments place to parent your children yet you cheer them on every time they do.

    You think of your children, no one else should have to.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  5. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, seizing the consoles seems overboard.

    Seizing anything is overboard. You might applaud the effort, but what do your kids learn? That responsibility is someone else's problem and that you have the right to control what others do? Those are the attributes of a reckless bully, exactly how we teach kids not to think. Parents should be against this for that (and the whole freedom of speech trampling of a universal human right thing).

  6. Kids will be kids by camg188 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are they going to do when a kid picks up a stick and pretends it's a gun?

  7. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by dwiget001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a parent, let alone a human being, you should really FIND OUT about who Hugo is and what he has done to the people of his country.

    I work with person from Venezuela, his family is here (U.S.) from Venezuela and they are all, everyone, completely opposed to mad-man, his usurping of power, his decimating the what freedoms the people of his country had, etc.

    Hugo and the antics of his government deserve the ridicule and condemnation of all free people. This gaming thing is just a small small piece of the overwhelming oppression he has rained down on his people.

  8. Not really by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was elected to being with, and that election seems to have been fair. However since then he has been taking increasingly underhanded methods of retaining power, stifling dissent and so on.

    Do remember that a large number of dictators are elected to power initially. They then just misuse the power and suppress freedom. That someone was elected initially doesn't mean they aren't a dictator now.

    1. Re:Not really by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering we regularly used to oust elected leaders and that is how we ended up the the Iran of today, maybe we ought sit back and see how this plays out.

  9. Re:Alberto Federico Ravell an Asshole Liar by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Media terrorist, eh? All those poor DVDs and storage viciously butchered in his attempt to influenece their policies by fear...

    Words have meaning. The meaning of terrorist is not "someone I don't like", despite US policy to the contrary.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  10. Re:Great, but don't go overboard by jombeewoof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    killing other humans is just as if not more natural than sex.

    --
    Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
  11. ORLY? by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, in your crazy little head, assassinating someone - which the CIA and our proxy Mossad do regularly - is the activity of a thuggish dictatorship...

    I guess when Chavez plots an assassination of a government we subsidize, that's a crime. However, when we carry out plotted assassinations against our enemies, it's justice. Yes, it makes perfect sense to me now!

    Hypocrisy? What's that, a new Morrissey cover band?

  12. Re:hugo... by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as I hate censorship, I do agree with this sentiment. Has anyone actually sat down and watched a kids' show? Ben10 has something like 10 violent acts every 3 minutes.

    Being anti-censorship does not mean "anything goes". I am the primary carer (uncle for my adopted nephew) for a 4 year old, and I can tell you there is a marked increase in hyperactive behavior, aggression and general lack of control for hours after watching Nickelodeon. Consequently, I have banned TV in my house. It was a few days of tantrums, but he's gotten over it, and the improvement in behavior is astonishing.

    I flatly refuse to accept that what we watch does not affect us. Movies like Saw and Hostel simply cannot be psychologically inert, the content is just too potent.

    "Down with censorship" and "down with psychologically and socially destructive media" are NOT mutually exclusive in the same way that "down with government control" and "down with harming your neighbor" are also not mutually exclusive. Lets grow up past the idea that any control of media that has a negative social impact is censorship and should be fought. Media *can* have a negative impact on social behavior and mental health. Get over it.

    --
    I hate printers.
  13. Re:Alberto Federico Ravell an Asshole Liar by jmpeax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not American, nor am I living in America.

    If such a tepid response to an obvious overstep by the government is a cultural difference, it certainly isn't a good one.