Slashdot Mirror


Nearby Star Forecast To Skirt Solar System

PipianJ writes "A recent preprint posted on arXiv by Vadim Bobylev presents some startling new numbers about a future close pass of one of our stellar neighbors. Based on studies of the Hipparcos catalog, Bobylev suggests that the nearby orange dwarf Gliese 710 has an 86% chance of skirting the outer bounds of the Solar System and the hypothesized Oort Cloud in the next 1.5 million years. As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth. This news about Gliese 710 isn't exactly new, but it's one of the first times the probability of this near-miss has been quantified."

135 comments

  1. FSM SAVE US! by Heytunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    XENU SAVE US!

    1. Re:FSM SAVE US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey! Who removed the above post?

    2. Re:FSM SAVE US! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Elron Hubbard?

    3. Re:FSM SAVE US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kid from The Jetsons?

    4. Re:FSM SAVE US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dummy. The red-haired guy that played Opie Taylor and Richie Cunnigham that now directs and produces movies like Apollo 13.

      He has a cult following and a lot of power.

    5. Re:FSM SAVE US! by icebike · · Score: 1

      So this is after 2012 right?

      Phfft! No problem.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:FSM SAVE US! by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

      No stupid, Agent Smith's character in Lord of the Rings.

    7. Re:FSM SAVE US! by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

      "Light peace and universal karma to you all. L. Ron has passed into the clouds of unknowing where the Self is Unself and the mind is as unmind and all that sort of thing. L. Ron may have melted from the earth like snow, but, one thing lives on. His money. Please send cheque to address below."
      The marharishi Veririshi, The Cayman Islands

      Truth is, Duke Nukem will save us, by the time this star comes anywhere near the sequel should be about ready.

    8. Re:FSM SAVE US! by MR.Mic · · Score: 1

      No, the American astronomer who discovered red shift and has a space telescope named after him.

    9. Re:FSM SAVE US! by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit!
      If you make it past 2012
      Then your next chance of certain death by comet impact will have to wait for 1.5 million years

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    10. Re:FSM SAVE US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember, we dealt with y2k around 1998. so something that may happen in 1.5 million years ...

  2. In 1.5 Million Years... by Kratisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... I'll get right on it!

    --
    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
    1. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      I knew that there was something fishy about those bonds that Goldman Sachs sold me . . . with a 2 million year maturity!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You joke, but it would probably take 1.5 million years to develop a technology that is capable of diverting or destroying a star.

    3. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by stms · · Score: 0

      There isn't a millennium to waist... well maybe we can waist just few.

    4. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's WASTE, you goddamn illiterate moron.

    5. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's GODDAMNED, you waist of spase.

    6. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your both wrong. You dont capitolize every dang letter in words just for the hell of them. Beleive me, I seen alot of people make that mistake. Its like their stupid terrists or gone nuculear or something.

      Regrads

      GWB

    7. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dear Mr. Bush.

      Please come back. Obama is a fucking faggot.
      Yes you were a pretty massive douche, but all things considered you did it well.

      Love,

      --The Citizens of the US

    8. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by martas · · Score: 1

      hmm, i don't know... destroying things is pretty easy...

    9. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'll get right on it!

      Famous last words!

    10. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's hifenated you desensitized clot!

    11. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by trapnest · · Score: 1

      "A lot" is two words.

    12. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must've touched a nerve!

    13. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Red Matter?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    14. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by arcticinfantry · · Score: 1

      OMG!!! Who modded this Interesting? I'd think infinity Naive is the only thing that's appropriate.

    15. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, on a scale that we can comprehend. Destroying people, buildings and maybe cities, but I doubt that we could destroy or move our own moon if we launched every single bomb in the world at it. Unless there is some breakthrough in spacetime manipulation, we can probably forget about destroying stars anytime, even in the very distant future.

    16. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Possible ways to destroy a star:

      1. Place a black hole near by so that it consumes the star. (Techniques for locating and moving a black hole are left as an exercise for the mad scientist attempting this)
      2. Use a Stargate to dial another gate on a planet near a black hole and send the gate into the star, eventually causing it to explode in a Supernova
      3. Send it on a collision course with a neutron star. When they collide, the combined mass increases the gravity so much, that they explode in an even bigger supernova and result in a black hole.
      4. Red matter.
      5. Construct anti-matter bomb with sufficient anti-matter to annihilate the star and its solar system.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    17. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by t0p · · Score: 1

      3. Send it on a collision course with a neutron star. When they collide, the combined mass increases the gravity so much, that they explode in an even bigger supernova and result in a black hole. .

      But if we can reroute the star in question, why destroy it? Why not just reroute it..?

      ...Never mind. I like fireworks as much as the next kid. Carry on.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    18. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by arcticinfantry · · Score: 1

      Wow. Where are my mod points when I need them? Are there any adults that can mod this whole thread into oblivion? This is probably the worst thread I've read in quite some time, and that's saying something on /. Can someone at least meta-moderate this?

    19. Re:In 1.5 Million Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeb, Neil, Marvin or Dorothy have not served yet!

  3. Nemesis by ChefInnocent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen Nemesis?

    1. Re:Nemesis by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I think it pretty much assumed that close passes by stars disturb the Oort Cloud.

    2. Re:Nemesis by Moldiver · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it *is* Nemesis...

    3. Re:Nemesis by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      No, this object is well and truly above solar escape velocity. Mch more than most of our neighbours in fact.

    4. Re:Nemesis by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen Nemesis

      Yes.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    5. Re:Nemesis by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Carl Sagan said it himself in Cosmos. I miss Carl [butthead astronomer] Sagan; our new token astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson isn't morose enough for my taste.

    6. Re:Nemesis by CFD339 · · Score: 1

      There's always Prof Brian Cox -- at least he's funny as hell.

      --
      The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    7. Re:Nemesis by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Nice karma per keystroke ratio!

    8. Re:Nemesis by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      He could have done 33% better without that '.' though...

    9. Re:Nemesis by AtariKee · · Score: 1

      Or Dr. David Grinspoon, the astrobiology equivalent of Jerry Garcia...

      --
      "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
      "Thank you, Master Control"
      -Sark and the MCP
    10. Re:Nemesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, FYI you're probably going to want to choose a word other than "token" for this situation.

  4. Time to start building a Death Star by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Looks like we're going to need some mega firepower to deal with this threat. Let's blow the bastage up to kingdom come before it gets here. We have here a cyber recreation of Dr. Teller, whose devoted his now vast computational facilities to devising a star destroying laser beam.

    --
    This is my sig.
  5. So.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    in the next 1.5 million years. As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth

    So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.

    So, in short, how is this news? I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:So.... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years... Never underestimate the capacity of human beings to do incredibly stupid things. But yes, we are currently in a race to see if we can establish sustainable populations off-planet before we or something else manages to wipe out all life here on earth. If we can't manage to win that race long before 1.5 million years from now, we're pretty much doomed as a species anyway.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:So.... by jpedlow · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly SMART in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth. So, in short, how is this news? I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.

      There, Fixed that for you.

      You're assuming that humanity will last the next 500 :P

    3. Re:So.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      I think that humanity as a whole can easily last another 500 years, unless there is a sudden threat from space, I don't see humanity killing each other as much lately. Why? Because we are so connected. Back during the cold war, unless you came from Russia to America, you didn't know anyone in Russia, there was no media to connect you to Russia. It was easy to imagine Russia as the enemy. Today? We'd get both sides of the story and most people would be indecisive on whether to fight or not. Will there be wars? Of course. Will weapons of mass-scale destruction be used? Probably. Will humanity as a whole die out? I don't think so. We've come a long way from the cold war. And even the most alarmist predictions of "global warming" still leaves a very large habitable chunk of land for humans.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:So.... by icebrain · · Score: 2, Informative

      But yes, we are currently in a race to see if we can establish sustainable populations off-planet before we or something else manages to wipe out all life here on earth.

      Don't kid yourself. Only a very few of us are in the race. The vast majority gave up about three steps into the marathon, plopped down on the couch, and tuned into American Idol.

      Frankly, I think space colonization needs to be a national priority, right up there with energy independence. I'm talking a national effort for those two issues that would make the WWII industrial and military effort seem like an elementary school field day in comparison, because I think humanity will face an extinction threat by the end of the century (biological warfare). It's only a matter of time before some terrorist or crazy religious group (or a nation comprised of such) gets hold of some bioweapon like ebola or Spanish flu, genetically tweaks it, and lets it loose; I can only hope we have somewhere to go when that happens. It just pisses me off that we were moving towards that and had made some measurable progress, only to give up and sit on our fat asses.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    5. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increasing population, dwindling resources (oil, water, food), ethnic rivalry (Europe and America, which are experiencing rapid demographic shifts) = recipe for conflict.

      People can be goaded to fight; the same plutocratic interests that ran the show in 2003 to goad is into Iraq can drum up support for something else again if they choose. People are sheep; they keep us in a perpetual state of fear.

    6. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Familiarity breeds contempt. Really, I'm more pessimistic about humanities survival now than I was during the cold war. Back then it was mainly the US and USSR staring down each other, neither really wanting war. Now we have nut jobs all over the place working on WMD projects. It's really only a matter of time.

    7. Re:So.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      But none of those are cataclysmic. Yes, it may lead to increased violence, but violence has always been a part of humanity. And violence doesn't mean that humanity will be destroyed. Oil will be phased out when it is really dwindling, we have a -lot- of oil, not limitless but a pretty large amount. Water will increase with newer advances in technology as will food. If we really start to run out of food, we can easily create greenhouses in uninhabited parts of the world that aren't very arable (Wyoming, the Dakotas, etc). Ethnic problems won't lead to massive-scale wars because they are all intermingled. There aren't any towns in the US that would be targets for large-scale ethnic warfare killing off large amounts of people like the World Wars or a hypothetical nuclear war.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    8. Re:So.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Even then, its pretty easy to launch a strike on them. Its hard to reform a country (such as Iraq, Vietnam, etc) but its a lot easier to win wars militarily. A coordinated bombing effort and strikes on Pyongyang would collapse the North Korean government, as would assassinations on their "dear leader" because of the personality cult. Same thing with strikes on key cities in Iran. China is very sane and knows that war with any nation isn't going to bring them any benefits and may cause their large population to revolt. If Iran/North Korea tries to do anything, they will be easy to stop any real threat to the US and western Europe. Now if you can reform the country is a different story. Similar to how we easily won the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but its hard to reform the country.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the free market thinks money is the highest goal, not survival, so it is unwilling to invest in research that does not have a quick pay-off. So govt funds the research and exploration into space, with printed money if need be, and then the market brings the side-effects (tang, solar power, water purification devices, materials such as odor-free underwear, space tourism) to the masses.

    10. Re:So.... by manekineko2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the huge size of the 1.5 million number, it's all moot anyway, but if we haven't figured out a way out of the solar system by then, it seems like a great way to hitch a ride with the rogue star. Sure, it's much weaker than the sun, but if by then we have the technology to park a couple of space stations or asteroids that much closer to it, seems like a great way to do extra-solar colonization on the cheap.

    11. Re:So.... by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sort-of agree, but you've got to do things in the right order. First step should be an almost closed life-support system. That still needs a *lot* of work. Some things can be done in parallel, but at the moment that looks like the rate limiting step. (And besides, advances in robotics and waldos might eliminate a lot of the problems. E.g., a good space-suit might not need direct connections to arms, fingers, etc. if that could be managed via wi-fi or some such.)

      To me it appears that the rate limiting steps are:
      1) almost closed life-support. (Presume that energy inputs in the form of electricity are allowed, but material inputs are strictly limited.)
      2) how should solar storms be handled? 3 feet of lead+3 feet of paraffin would probably work, but that's a bit of a heavy shield.
      3) mining carbonaceous chondrites for air and water replacements. (I said the life support was almost closed. That means you need supplements to actually close it.)
      4) solving long-term life without gravity. (This is probably a biological problem, though a large spinning construction would also work. At least as a stop-gap.)
      5) NOW one can talk about a long-term colony. That means that at this point one can start fine-tuning the sociology to create a stable or quasi-stable civilization existing in the environment of space.

      So at the moment there's not much the average person can do. Supporting space-based research is good. Supporting robotics is good. Supporting space-enthusiast societies is good. But expecting any particular result in the next decade is unwise.

      N.B.: The energetics of space colonies aren't properly dealt with by science fictions stories...ANY of them. Asteroids have orbits that are skew to each other (often not by a lot, but it doesn't take a lot to make transport between them unreasonably expensive). Even so, if you notice, Larry Niven presumed that the space ships used by the belters used hydrogen fusion jets. That's probably not energetic enough, but he was vague enough about how much fuel was used that "perhaps". He did presume that the ships could accelerate at several Gs for extended periods of time.

      More practical is a civilization based around exchange of messages with little exchange of physical media. That doesn't require technologies like hydrogen fusion powered torches (rockets).

      N.B.: The further out you get from the sun, the more skew the orbits of the satellites (planets, asteroids, etc.) are. So the more energy intensive it is to get from one to another. It would often be cheaper to get into high earth orbit than to match to something with a widely skew orbit.

      P.S.: This argument doesn't really apply to trojan points. Things orbiting in trojan points should have easy transitions from one to another. But that's a small fraction of the asteroids.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:So.... by t0p · · Score: 1

      Earth will have great historic, nostalgic, spiritual and commercial value. It is the homeworld - the place where the human race began - the trade in trashy souvenirs alone will be huge. We can't let all that get knocked out by some no-name comet.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    13. Re:So.... by t0p · · Score: 1

      I like the way you play up the ability of "the US and Western Europe" to protect itself and downplay the fact that a seriously-threatened North Korea or potential future Iran will fling nukes at targets in the middle east, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, etc etc. Also you ignore the fact that a strike on North Korea might provoke China, who has a military arsenal quite capable of reaching the USA and Europe. And how about the probability that Iran in its death throes would launch a nuclear strike on Israel - and if Israel responds with it's nukes, that would drag in all its hostile-minded neighbours, which would result in a regional Armageddon?

      Your vision of precision strikes and low levels of collateral damage is all very nice. But IRL, war ain't like that. As you will find, as Chinese or Russian ICBMs rain down on your hometown.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    14. Re:So.... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.

      Chances are, we are going to do something incredible stupid and not survive to that point anyway.

      And also, we'd have to colonize outside the solar system to be safe here. Mars would be just as threatened by the comets as Earth.

    15. Re:So.... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      What concerns me the most is that some biolab is going to develop some superbug that gets out and kills half the population.

  6. OH NOES! by Eggbloke · · Score: 1

    the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth.

    Its in 1.5 million years. We will have lazors (Firefox spell check couldn't figure out it's lasers) to shoot the comets by then.

    --
    I care not for your karma and your mod points.
    1. Re:OH NOES! by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what you get for using the 4chan dictionary plugin.

    2. Re:OH NOES! by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its in 1.5 million years. We will have lazors

      Only because the sharks will be running the planet by then.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:OH NOES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Alan Parson's project will save us.

  7. Spooky Chant by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the year 1,502,000....

    1. Re:Spooky Chant by lul_wat · · Score: 0

      If man is, still allliivveee

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    2. Re:Spooky Chant by lul_wat · · Score: 0

      If woman can survive

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    3. Re:Spooky Chant by Dthief · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the year 1,502,000....

      *The year 1,502,010

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    4. Re:Spooky Chant by stwrtpj · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the year 1,502,000....

      War was beginning

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    5. Re:Spooky Chant by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      But what day?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Spooky Chant by nfojunky · · Score: 1

      But what day?

      I'll bet it's a Tuesday. Nothing good ever happens on a Tuesday.

    7. Re:Spooky Chant by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I have an all-day appointment that Tuesday. Can we make it Wednesday instead?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Spooky Chant by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Nice Conan O'Brien reference.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  8. Don't worry . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    From what I learned in my Texas astronomy class the comets will harmlessly splash against the crystal spheres that support the planets and sun.

    1. Re:Don't worry . . . by thechao · · Score: 5, Funny

      I spent years in Texas schools, and we were always told it was a giant brass armature. When did God put in the bling?

    2. Re:Don't worry . . . by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't that what the Reformation was about? ;^)

    3. Re:Don't worry . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were taught that the entire physical universe just created itself out of thin air one split second for NO REASON WHATSOEVER.

      Nobody has been taught that, but it does get repeated. The Big Bang is not the origin of energy. It says that at some point in the past the universe was infinitely small and dense. The energy wasn't created, it was all there, in the exact same amount it exists today. It simply expanded and changed forms, and it is still doing so. The evidence that this indeed happened cannot be refuted.

      Of course, you're going to chime in with, "well, where DID the energy all come from then?" And when you do that, you fail to realize two things: First, it would be equally as difficult to explain no energy existing at all as it is to explain that some energy exists. There was never any point at which it didn't exist, there will never be any point where it will no longer exist. Second, it's much more plausible that the energy has always been there than it is that an intelligent being capable of creating the universe has always been there. If the universe needs a "creator" than so does God. If you want to stop the recursion at God, you might as well stop at the more plausible level.

    4. Re:Don't worry . . . by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

      I guess the Texan Nation decided the Catholic Church wasn't strict enough. Thumbscrews, The Rack, and listening to Iron Maiden will catch their students' attention better and will be far cheaper than developing an engaging and inspiring curriculum.

  9. Nibiru/Marduk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are slightly off... its Nibiru/Marduk... or heraps this near miss is what sends Planet X hurtiling our way. "Sometime in the next 1.5 million years" woul then translate to 2.5 years from now, and the near miss is on 12.21.2012. Time to get insured!

  10. We don't have time to waste, people by straponego · · Score: 4, Funny

    We must arm NOW! That star *is* a weapon of mass destruction! We don't want the smoking gun to be a black hole! In this vial I have a sample of Hydrogen-- of the EXACT SAME MATERIAL detected in Gliese 710!

    1. Re:We don't have time to waste, people by deepershade · · Score: 1

      You're not suggesting that this is some kinda of, 'death' star are you? Right, who's got Mark Hamhill's phone number?

    2. Re:We don't have time to waste, people by zx75 · · Score: 1

      One might even call it... a death star?

      --
      This is not a sig.
  11. H. G. Wells, 1911 by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    H. G. Wells, "The Star" (1911)

    It was on the first day of the New Year that the announcement was made, almost simultaneously from three observatories, that the motion of the planet Neptune, the outermost of all the planets that wheel about the sun, had become very erratic....

    Beyond the orbit of Neptune there is space, vacant so far as human observation has penetrated, without warmth or light or sound, blank emptiness, for twenty million times a million miles. That is the smallest estimate of the distance to be traversed before the very nearest of the stars is attained. And, saving a few comets more unsubstantial than the thinnest flame, no matter had ever to human knowledge crossed this gulf of space, until early in the twentieth century this strange wanderer appeared....

    On the third day of the new year the newspaper readers of two hemispheres were made aware for the first time of the real importance of this unusual apparition in the heavens. "A Planetary Collision," one London paper headed the news, and proclaimed Duchaine's opinion that this strange new planet would probably collide with Neptune....

    And when next it rose over Europe everywhere were crowds of watchers on hilly slopes, on house-roofs, in open spaces, staring eastward for the rising of the great new star. It rose with a white glow in front of it, like the glare of a white fire, and those who had seen it come into existence the night before cried out at the sight of it. "It is larger," they cried. "It is brighter!" And, indeed the moon a quarter full and sinking in the west was in its apparent size beyond comparison, but scarcely in all its breadth had it as much brightness now as the little circle of the strange new star.

    "It is brighter!" cried the people clustering in the streets. But in the dim observatories the watchers held their
    breath and peered at one another. "_It is nearer_," they said. "_Nearer!_"

    [Most of the story tells of how star approaches close to Earth, creating considerable havoc...]

    But the star had passed, and men, hunger-driven and gathering courage only slowly, might creep back to their ruined cities, buried granaries, and sodden fields. Such few ships as had escaped the storms of that time came stunned and shattered and sounding their way cautiously through the new marks and shoals of once familiar ports....

    The Martian astronomers--for there are astronomers on Mars, although they are very different beings from men--were naturally profoundly interested by these things. They saw them from their own standpoint of course. "Considering the mass and temperature of the missile that was flung through our solar system into the sun," one wrote, "it is astonishing what a little damage the earth, which it missed so narrowly, has sustained. All the familiar continental markings and the masses of the seas remain intact, and indeed the only difference seems to be a shrinkage of the white discoloration (supposed to be frozen water) round either pole." Which only shows how small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem, at a distance of a few million miles.

    1. Re:H. G. Wells, 1911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      citation please.

      ... and no cheap references to Pinoqachole this time! ...

       

  12. Nibiru / Marduk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah! This "near miss" was predicted thousands of years ago by the Sumarians and it winds up responsible hurling a planet toward us that we can't see right now. Planet's Name? Nirbiru/Marduk/Planet X, or whatever they're calling it these days.

    Of course, that means that "sometime in the next 1.5 million years" should probably read "in the next 2 years" so that the Planet X has sufficient time to reach us by December 21st, 2012. Time to Get Insured!

  13. Binary System? by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

    So what are the odds of this thing being captured into a long orbit? I would imagine this will set off a shower like dropping a ball of water into a screen, but I'm also curious if this will just graze us, or if our suns gravity would be sufficient to actually capture this dwarf and create a binary system?

    1.5 Million years though. At least we have some time...

    1. Re:Binary System? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > So what are the odds of this thing being captured into a long orbit?

      Zero.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Binary System? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Probably not *quite* zero. Pretty nearly, though. The Oort cloud isn't much of a resisting medium, but we don't know everything that's out there. There *could* be something massive enough to slow the star and dark enough that we haven't seen it. That's not the way to bet, though, even at odds of a million to one.

      And then you've got to assume that the incoming star hits this dark brown dwarf. (Nothing much lighter would work.)

      Say there's perhaps one chance in a trillion. (it's a rough estimate...and I wouldn't want to justify it, but it's my guess of a ballpark figure.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Binary System? by cperciva · · Score: 1

      And then you've got to assume that the incoming star hits this dark brown dwarf

      Or rather, hope that they don't collide. The energy released by a stellar collision that close to Earth would probably destroy not only the human race, but also all other life on Earth.

    4. Re:Binary System? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I wasn't assuming a direct collision, but a glancing collision that was sufficient to allow them to exchange momentum. Otherwise I'd have put the odds at a lot higher than a trillion to one. (I hadn't even considered the possibility, certainly not enough to calculate the energies. In fact I still haven't, not even as an estimate. But I'm not sure you're wrong, even though this might happen, say, 3/2 lightyears away. Especially if, since we're only interested in interactions that lead to capture, it was retrograde. OTOH, anything that causes a shower of large comets has a reasonable probability of wiping out 90% of all families of life on earth. [It's happened once before, so the odds aren't impossible.] I was envisioning an interaction that sent the brown dwarf into interstellar space, and sent the incoming star into the inner solar system [inside pluto's orbit] at a reduced speed.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  14. Global warming save us by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

    Global warming melts ice. Quick, run your cars 24/7 and heat up the earth so we can melt those comets before they hit the ground* and do damage!

  15. I know who will cover it! by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Funny

    Larry King. He'll still be alive.

    1. Re:I know who will cover it! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      My lack of mod points right now pains me.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  16. I am your hero, thanks to entanglement! by assemblerex · · Score: 1

    I've already found a way to live that long, and deflect any danger. We all live in complete harmony in that age, with all the comforts imaginable.
    As long as you don't try to prove me wrong, thanks to entanglement it's a done deal.
    You can thank me at the bar.

  17. Oops a couple of decimals off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False alarm. We were a couple of decimal places off. It won't reach the Oort Cloud for another 1.5 years and the comets shouldn't reach the inner solar system until some time in December of 2012 so there's nothing to worry about.

  18. Nah - Time to start breeding Dragons by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Look, if you're going to have to get rid of Thread, you've got to use the right tools for the job...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Nah - Time to start breeding Dragons by Orbijx · · Score: 1

      So, I guess this means we've got to kill it with fire on an epic scale, eh?

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
  19. How will this look from the Earth? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    As a non-astronomer, I wonder how this will appear from the inner sloar system, i.e. the earth? How bright will it be, will it be visible during the day, which parts of the earth will it be visible from, when will it start to be visible? These are all non-comet/end of the world questions, so i know that they are typically non-Slashdot ideas, but I'm still interested.

    Any astronomy types out there who can figure this out?

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:How will this look from the Earth? by gront · · Score: 3, Informative

      At closest approach it will be a first-magnitude star about as bright as Antares. from the wikipedia article link in the post. more about antares: http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/antares-star/

    2. Re:How will this look from the Earth? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      At closest approach it will be a first-magnitude star about as bright as Antares.

      Damn, cancelling my orders to invest in sun block right now.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  20. Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Over the past century, space travel's usefulness has been limited to war, boosting political egos, threatening war, communications satellites, Earth-observation satellites, and a bit of astronomy. Yes, there have been commercial spinoffs, like developing Velcro andTang(tm) powdered orange-colored juice, but the engineers and scientists who could have built us something useful, like the franistan, where busy doing militarized space programs instead.

    You can't colonize space unless you can build a sustainable closed ecosystem that runs on sunlight, and we're not even close. We've built a few toy terrariums that failed, like the Biosphere, but our one significant experiment in terraforming has also been failing, making this planet look less and less like the Terra that we started with. We're not going to be able to build space colonies big enough to house a significant fraction of humanity until we've learned how to keep an already-mostly-working planet working.

    Furthermore, real space colonization is an immense project - it's not just throwing a few canned monkeys into orbit that for a few billion dollars of investment per seat, it's a project about as big and economically transformative as, say, Agriculture or Cities, and unless the Great Nanotech Singularity saves our asses without burying them in Grey Goo, we're going to have to keep the planet working well for probably as long a timescale as we've spent on those experiments. It's a Really Really big project, not one of those quick and dirty experiments like the Industrial Revolution or the Nation-State. Fortunately, 1.5 million years is a respectably long time - it's 100 times as long as we've had Civilization, 30-40 times as long as we've been our current species, more along the scale of how long we've had modern Acheulean stone tools or maybe fire.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      to suggest the only advances that came out of the space industry are velcro and tang, is stupid and insulting to all the amazing engineers that worked in the field. it destroys any credability your rant had.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by icebrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know there's a lot of work ahead of us. And I realize that "canned monkeys" aren't enough. But the big point is, real colonization has to start somewhere--ie, with lots of canned monkeys and solar-power satellites. Too many people want to sit around saying that all of this is too hard, that it isn't practical without advanced technologies that we don't currently have, and then decide "well, we can't do it right now, so why bother trying?" They conveniently forget that all of this Buck Rogers takes effort, not just bucks. Someone has to work on them; they don't just fall out of the sky ready to go. We're fooled by seeing all of these different advances in different fields (like computing), forgetting that the progress is happening because, well, somebody is doing the work. It just happens that most of that work can be applied to other fields. But things like nuclear space propulsion and vacuum-rated hardware don't have lots of other applications, and unless someone in the aerospace field works on them, unless somebody puts money towards them, they'll stagnate. We'll sit there forever wondering why we don't have all these fancy things, and yet never actually get them.

      I mean, we didn't sit there after the Wright brothers flew and decide that pursuing airplanes was a worthless endeavor, that we should just wait until we could build the 787, did we? Well, that's what we're doing with space. We've taken our first baby step, then given up on trying to walk because we can't yet run a marathon. Maybe we won't make it out into space before we manage to kill ourselves off... but I, for one, would rather go down fighting. And if that does happen, if we do die off and exist no more, then everything we've ever done in the name of progress and benefiting humanity, everything every person ever did, will be for naught.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    3. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by tomhuxley · · Score: 1

      Particularly insulting since both velcro and Tang predate the Space program (they were only popularized as a result their use by NASA, neither were invented for the Space program).

    4. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      singularities, paradigm shifts, don't occur unless someone funds the research, if the free market doesn't see an incentive there, then govt should do it.

    5. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by Nutria · · Score: 3, Informative

      I mean, we didn't sit there after the Wright brothers flew and decide that pursuing airplanes was a worthless endeavor, that we should just wait until we could build the 787, did we? Well, that's what we're doing with space. We've taken our first baby step, then given up on trying to walk because we can't yet run a marathon.

      That's a very bad analogy, since it's 10 metric butt-loads easier and simpler to fly than it is to get into orbit: planes don't need to worry about cosmic radiation, gravity, little holes in the fuselage, etc, etc.

      that we should just wait until we could build the 787

      There have been only a handful of new commercial aviation designs in the last 30 years. The Boeing 737 & 747 were designed in the 1960s, the 757 & 767 in the 1960s. Since then, nothing but incremental improvements. Same on the military side.

      Hell, even the Concorde design is 45 years old!

      Aeronautical science and engineering are bordering practical and economic limits enforced on us by physics. For example: sure "we" could build another supersonic commercial aircraft, but there's no real purpose to expending all that energy to push through the atmosphere at 1400 mph, when 550 mph is oodles cheaper, and it's still 550 miles per hour!!! My (RIP) grandparents remembered Lindbergh and crossing the country in coal-powered trains.

      And this isn't even mentioning that supersonic travel over land is prohibited because it's just not nice to shatter a jillion window panes 4 or 5 times a day!

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    6. Re:Nations are the wrong tools for this time scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not be so insulted. He has a valid point, and he is passionately expressing this. Generalizing is an allowed conversational utility, and generally, the space program hasn't given us as much as we would have hoped. We haven't gotten the things we dreamed about, like offworld bases and *real* space ships (not the space buses we have now, who by the way can't get very far).

      Until governments start doing real space exploration that we can relate to, the science experiments they do now have little to no effect on the public awareness. Scrapping the moon program might have been wise from an echonomical or even technological point of view, but was very unwise from a public relations point of view. And this type of unintelligent decisionmaking is just ongoing all the time, while war is raging across the middle east.

  21. Maybe ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... it'll capture Pluto. Not that we'd care one way or the other.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Maybe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true. After all, we have plenty of round, not quite planet sized bodies here on earth. Who'd miss just one more named, not quite planet sized, rotund body?

  22. Fearmongering again. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a star moving close that is very different from ours. It moves to the oort could, and therefore definitely makes it visible. There is so much to learn.

    And all you can think about is how it “threatens” earth? Have you seen the space in the solar system? Have you calculated the likeliness? And in 1.5 million years? I wouldn’t be surprised if we manage to have a congested hyperspace freeway to Gliese 710 by then! Or if we are long extinct and replaced by ravens, other apes, dolphins and octopuses. Nature wouldn’t care anyway.

    Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously. And enjoy the wonders of nature.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Fearmongering again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new raven-ape-dolphin-octopus overlords from Gliese 710.

    2. Re:Fearmongering again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about the gravitational effects, even at that distance. It *could* have significant effects.

    3. Re:Fearmongering again. by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously. And enjoy the wonders of nature

      Aside from the domestic dangers, we haven't much else to look forward to.

      I'm reminded about the folly of tempting God.

      So ... we may as well look forward to 1.5 fairly fallow years, and the time to do something. It's a nice span of time for peace and prosperity. Serendipitous indeed.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  23. frequency seems a bit off. by khallow · · Score: 1

    The Technology Review blog claims that one star approaches within a parsec once every two million years. I understand the Wolf 424 system will also approach within a parsec (nearest approach is supposed to be somewhere around a lightyear) 9,000 years from now. It seems unlikely to me that the frequency is that low. Maybe they're counting large stars, not the red dwarfs (Wolf 424 is a binary red dwarf pair).

  24. This is an opportunity, not a threat! by cperciva · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Providing that humanity still exists in the year 1.5M but hasn't yet spread to other solar systems, this is a huge opportunity: Rather than needing to travel 3-4 light years in order to reach another star, we'll need to travel less than one light year -- thus making the trip both faster and much cheaper.

    Who knows, it might even be possible to slowly spread across the entire galaxy without ever venturing into interstellar space.

  25. Can't resist... by GuardianBob420 · · Score: 1

    In the year 1,502,000....

    War was beginning

    What happen?

    1. Re:Can't resist... by awshidahak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somebody set us up the star.

    2. Re:Can't resist... by Chas · · Score: 1

      Main screen turn on.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  26. What an opportunity by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    With light speed travel so unlikely it's a rare chance to visit another solar system (if we're still around then).

  27. Too little, too late .... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    "I don't suspect we'll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012, and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects," said Kirkpatrick."

    Too little, too late ... If we've only started a few years before, we might have saved ourselves from 2012 :P

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  28. Finally, Planet X! by heidaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always knew these idiots were right. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIDlqR1jnKA The reptile people are just hiding it from us.

  29. Will finally kill the dinosaurs on Isla Nublar! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    And so will disappear the last sign than man was ever here.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  30. Astronomy picture of the day of Gliese 710 by gront · · Score: 1
    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991211.html

    Astronomy picture of the day for December 11, 1999.

    The star field shown [in the image at the above link] is based on the Palomar Digitized Sky Survey and is 1/4 degree wide (about half the diameter of the full moon).

  31. Unless we do something stupid? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Uhm. Are you living on the same planet the rest of us are?
    The sheer, seething mass of rampant stupidity is only slightly below the point where it implodes and collapses into a stupidity singularity.
    If we ARE actually alive in 1.5 million years, it'll prove two things.

    1: There IS a God.
    2: He's one warped motherfucker for keeping us around.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  32. What Fearmongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I, for one, welcome our new stellar driven icy overlords.

  33. Oh crap by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    We're all going to die in 1.5 million years!

  34. WITHIN the next 1.5M years... by throughwithit · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...so, he isn't necessarily saying that it will be 1.5M years before this happens, or even in ~1.5M years, but sometime within that timeframe. We ought not deduce that we have such a long time to prepare, nor fail to account for the possibility of other intruding or impacting bodies headed our way even sooner.

  35. Exactly by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    I would have wished those where my words. It seems only very little people have the right perspective on space travel, if I see the responses to this comment.

    I also doubt whether space colonisation is the answer. If we are still around at that time, we probably have mapped out most of the objects in the Oort cloud and/or build a deflection system for commets that might threat Earth (or possibly some other planets/moons in our solar system that we have inhabited).

  36. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ride home...

  37. Change velocity by 200 m/sec by mbone · · Score: 1

    Now, how do you change the velocity of the solar system by 200 meters/sec ? That's all we need to dodge Gliese 710, and we have a few hundred thousand years to think about it.

  38. Solar power satellites could be useful by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I did mention earth-observation satellites and communications satellites, but solar power satellites are potentially another useful technology for actually doing useful things on Earth.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks