Slashdot Mirror


NASA Mars Satellite Snaps 1st Public-Picked Photos

coondoggie writes "NASA today said it took eight high-resolution photos of Mars that were chosen through a public suggestion box the space agency put up in January. The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, or HiRISE camera, aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter is nicknamed 'the people's camera,' NASA stated. Through the suggestion box known as HiWish, NASA has received nearly 1,000 suggestions. The first eight images of areas the public selected are available online."

39 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. I was all like, "Take pictures of the surface" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And they listened.

    1. Re:I was all like, "Take pictures of the surface" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To be fair, the other 992 suggestions requested pics of the Mars Face specifically.

    2. Re:I was all like, "Take pictures of the surface" by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Where the hell are my mod points? NASA made satellites easier to use because I told them some vague thing. I did that for Microshaft once! THE SYSTEM WORKS!

      --
      The game.
    3. Re:I was all like, "Take pictures of the surface" by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the other 992 suggestions requested pics of the Mars Face specifically.

      They'll get to that, but their Photoshop specialist is currently working on the Prius project.

      --
      ---
  2. And within seconds... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    SLASHDOTTED!

    1. Re:And within seconds... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would appear the resources allocated to resolve the issues with the Prius were pulled from NASA's pool of web devs.

  3. Mirror? by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An article about pictures isn't that interesting when you can't see the pictures...

  4. The face by s122604 · · Score: 1

    I need more pictures of the face, and Kermit the Frog

    1. Re:The face by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HiRISE_face.jpg

      My God! It looks nothing like any face I've ever seen! Obviously the beings who created it possess an intelligence entirely unlike our own!

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  5. The worst part about trolls by Jeng · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is that you can only mod them down once.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    1. Re:The worst part about trolls by segin · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that the worst part of conservative nutjobs is that they can only destroy the economy once, but no, they can destroy it each and every time the people bring it back.

  6. pics by majortom1981 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The actual link to the pics is here but its down right now . http://uahirise.org/releases/hiwish-captions.php

    1. Re:pics by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      As of 22:19 UCT, that one is down too.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  7. Give them a break.... by Orga · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know you guys have to wait for the images to get from Mars to here. stop hitting REFRESH!

  8. Re:slashvertisement by Itninja · · Score: 1, Informative

    I use NoScript and AdBlock so noticed none of those.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  9. Barsoom by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    I want pictures of the ancient martian cities. And the mostly naked martian girls.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Barsoom by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! 3-breasted women are HOT!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  10. Re:Buzzkill by TheDarAve · · Score: 1

    Your comment would make sense if it was procured or launched since August 2008. HiRISE has been on station over Mars since 10MAR2006. The asset is there, not using it would be a bigger waste of money.

  11. Re:Buzzkill by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter cost $720 million dollars. There are over 75 million students in the United States. Please reply with your plans for fixing the education system with a budget of $9.60 per child.

    Personally, I can't think of a better way to encourage students to dream big and to pursue science than a mission like this one.

  12. Re:Buzzkill by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buzzkill is right. You could at least have formulated a reasonable complaint, instead of being a whiny bitch. How much do you figure it costs to snap a few pictures using a satellite which is already in orbit of mars? Enough to buy lunch for 10 kids in your hypothetical "closing schools"?

  13. suggestions? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    I'll give you 20 to 1 odds on 90% of those "suggestions" being something along the lines of "Take pictures of Uranus!".

    1. Re:suggestions? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      I'll give you 20 to 1 odds on 90% of those "suggestions" being something along the lines of "Take pictures of Uranus!".

      I'll give 40 to 1 that the few wishes selected out of the 1000's were pictures that the NASA scientists wanted to take anyway, but created a huge public relations event to make themselves look good. "Just consider the kids...!"

    2. Re:suggestions? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Kind of like the space station module naming contest.

      "Suggest a name for the module! Or, just vote on one of the ones we've selected for you! Oops, the one that won isn't one we listed and it's silly, guess we won't do that. Also, we're not picking the one that got the most votes of the ones we ourselves suggested. Apparently we only put that one on there to fuck with you."

    3. Re:suggestions? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ,i>I'll give 40 to 1 that the few wishes selected out of the 1000's were pictures that the NASA scientists wanted to take anyway, but created a huge public relations event to make themselves look good. "Just consider the kids...!"

      The odds that NASA is only taking the pictures they want to take because they look scientifically valuable to them is 100%.

      The odds that NASA is selecting such pictures from the set of public suggestions is also 100%.

      I mean sure the orbiter is taking other pictures besides, but the whole point of this exercise is that NASA by itself does not have the resources to manually go over the lower resolution photos taken of Mars to find things to look at closer and keep the HiRISE camera busy.

      The PR aspect is there for sure, but they really do want the public to serve as a first-level filter of the massive amount of photographic data taken of Mars. That's why they don't just ask you to submit coordinates, but also to categorize the picture and suggest why it's scientifically interesting, to make winnowing through the suggestions easier. Otherwise they could just have you submit coordinates, or give you a list and let you 'vote' like they did for the ISS module. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  14. Re:Buzzkill by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    NASA budget for 2010 = 0.52% federal (18724 million).

    That is almost exactly 26 days of war in iraq or about 1500 times the bonus of the CEO of Goldman Sachs after receiving the bailout.

    Our return on investment for NASA is spectacular.

  15. Re:Buzzkill by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    We have to multitask as a species. If we stopped the whole world to work on one problem at a time, nothing would get done.

    Context switching is expensive.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  16. Re:Buzzkill by Itninja · · Score: 1

    720 Million was just to cost of the physical craft. That pales in comparison to the billions up billions of dollars worth of infrastructure required to even get the thing off the ground.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  17. Re:Buzzkill by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cognitive dissonance I guess. They rail against bailouts that sucked but probably did save the economy from a total collapse. But then things like pretty pictures of Mars it's all 'whatever it takes!'.

    What you call "cognitive dissonance" I call "having a sense of proportion".

    In other news, I'm unhappy with the automotive and banking bailouts for wasting money, yet just yesterday I payed extra for a completely unnecessary helping of guacamole for my quesadillas. Clearly I am a hypocrite.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  18. Re:Buzzkill by snooo53 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Guacamole and sour cream are never unnecessary when it comes to quesadillas!

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  19. Re:Mod me down if you're a liberal pansy by Toonol · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a conservative libertarian, and I'm eager to mod you down as well.

  20. Re:Buzzkill by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What can I say ... your comments are a perfect demonstration of the fact that education is wasted on most people.

    The US spends about 1 trillion dollars per year on education. The entire NASA budget clocks in at under 19 billion. If you scrapped NASA entirely, you could increase education spending by less than 2 percent. Now, it's clear where you stand on the issue, but I'd personally much rather use that money to push back the boundaries of human knowledge instead of giving it to the school system and praying for a miracle.

  21. Re:Buzzkill by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Throwing money at schools won't improve education. The extra money will go for more rent-a-cops, metal detectors and an extra limo for the members of the school board. It has been tried before.

    However canceling NASA will eliminate the aspirations and goals of thousands of bright young people and put us in a position where all the knowledge and skills of a generation of aerospace engineers are lost. The cost of restarting the space program after giving it up for a decade would dwarf the amount saved. We give that up and we as a nation will have accepted our place among the third world nations while nations like Pakistan, India, China and even North Korea take the lead.

    I agree that we need a larger focus on education in this country, but gutting NASA isn't the answer. It is going to take a major policy change to fix education because the system is degenerate. If that costs more, then can find the money somewhere else.

  22. Samara Valles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ah, Samara Valles you wrinkly old bellybutton you! http://www.uahirise.org/ESP_016895_1525 [www.uahirise.org]

  23. Re:Buzzkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The cost listed on wikipedia is the budgeted cost of the mission, which includes construction of the spacecraft, the launch vehicle (and a use of the launch site), and the operations team for the spacecraft for its expected lifetime. So yes, 720 million is the total cost. I don't know what other "infrastructure" you could possibly be talking about.

  24. Martian Mutant City by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    >>And the mostly naked martian girls.

    Or really any chick with 3 boobs will do.

  25. Re:Buzzkill by Nivlheim · · Score: 2, Informative

    That figure is off by a factor 6-10 too. In October 2008 the number of people enrolled in anything from kindergarten to college was ~76 million. ~48 million in elementary and high school. Source.

    $18.7 billion / 76 million students = $246/student
    $18.7 billion / 48 million students = $390/student

    Doubt that would fix much, even if every single dollar trickled all the way down.

  26. Re:Buzzkill by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the hot sauce!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  27. Re:slashvertisement by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Just doing my part to bring knowledge to the unenlightened.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.