Slashdot Mirror


C Programming Language Back At Number 1

derrida writes "After more than 4 years C is back at position number 1 in the TIOBE index. The scores for C have been pretty constant through the years, varying between the 15% and 20% market share for almost 10 years. So the main reason for C's number 1 position is not C's uprise, but the decline of its competitor Java. Java has a long-term downward trend. It is losing ground to other languages running on the JVM. An example of such a language is JavaFX, which is now approaching the top 20."

30 of 535 comments (clear)

  1. Re:These numbers are garbage by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your anecdotal evidence it irrefutable.

  2. Re:These numbers are garbage by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn if you know 20 developers, Groovy must be like 2-3 at least!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  3. Re:0.007% by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not? Hell, I know when I want to check out the goings on in programming the first and last place I turn is YouTube.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  4. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by MrMista_B · · Score: 5, Funny

    > This is the true spirit of our times. Any publicity is good publicity.

    People falsely accused of pedophilia would beg to differ.

  5. Re:Submitter bias: Java's "downward trend" by ozbird · · Score: 5, Funny

    C rising due to global warming. Film at 11.

  6. Re:Why C? by ucblockhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Java is extremely portable. A Java application can be run anywhere someone wrote a VM for it in C or C++.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  7. Re:Java is crap anyway by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And nothing more nightmarish than bad assembly.

    (I (disagree (there (is (a (missing) (parenthesis (somewhere)) in)) (your Lisp code)))

  8. Re:That's great and all... by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, that's the NULL position. That's where programming languages go to die.

    And signals raise from the dead.

  9. Re:0.007% by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because with Java - I generally do not need to search the web for the answer. However, take C# for instance, and depending on which OS I'm running on, I may have to run 20 or 30 searches for every single answer, because I thought I might have it - but won't know until I try it whether it works for 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, or 3.51....etc.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  10. Re:nr.11 by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, they do keep saying that. I'm also sure that they can point to dozens of people who stopped iPad development and switched to Android. Somehow, the iPhone and iPad will have to get by with the tens of thousands who remain...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    Huh, I could've sworn Java was over 18 by now. Oops.

  12. Re:Java is crap anyway by Courageous · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well it could have been worse.

    <I><disagree><there><is><a><missing><parenthesis><somewhere><in><your><lisp><code></code></lisp></your></in></somewhere></parenthesis></missing></a></is></there></disagree></I>

  13. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Speaking of which, C now stands for Citigroup according to Google.

    Huh? Your search shows "C programming language" as the first hit. "C is for cookie" comes before the citigroup hits.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  14. Re:Submitter bias: Java's "downward trend" by Hooya · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Film at 11.

    You're off by 1. The film is actually at 10.

  15. Re:Java is crap anyway by Score+Whore · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meh. When I want to show people how bad perl is, I just open up a text editor. Mash my face against the keyboard a couple of times. Then point out that the resulting gibberish is valid perl.

  16. Re:X is the new Y by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean other than assembly?

  17. Re:But what about Johnny Mathis versus Diet Pepsi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I write ISAPI filters to serve up WebGL enabled sites you insensitive clod!

  18. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd totally date myself if I could reproduce asexually.

  19. Re:X is the new Y by mirix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, other than assembly is implied ;-)

    I do not want to write drivers in asm... ughhh.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  20. Re:nr.11 by pspahn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you're like, entitled to your own opinion, man.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  21. Re:C-whatever by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

    But at least FORTRAN was written in C! Right? Right?

  22. Ah, Lips. er, lisspth. Whatever. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lisp'ers just need you to cons() them into a good palette edit. So take 'em out of their nest in your cars() to an indentist, and C to it. Make sure you get parenthetical permission first, though.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  23. Re:The Ultimate Language! by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    The ultimate imperative language is, of course, Klingon.

  24. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why, are they Catholic?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  25. Re:Submitter bias: Java's "downward trend" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suggested title: An Inconvenient Knuth

  26. Re:Actually it is... by Jamu · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duckX_$3[0#GENERAL PROTECTION FAULT

    --
    Who ordered that?
  27. Re:Actually it is... by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Funny

    C'mon. Be serious.

    I do 50% of my coding in C and since the time a hooded man told me "Use the snprintf(), Luke!" I never had a problem :D

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  28. Re:0.007% by arndawg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Untill they use twitter as well, these numbers means nothing!

  29. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    This.

    C has no this; this is a C++ and Java and JavaScript thing.

  30. Re:TIOBE methodology is so flawed it's pointless by srealm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that make C a cougar?