No Linking To Japanese Newspaper Without Permission
stovicek writes with this excerpt from Ars Technica about the Japanese newspaper Nihon Keizai Shimbun, or Nikkei (English language site, so far apparently unaffected): "Nikkei has taken efforts to preserve its paywall to absurd new levels: anyone wanting to link to the site must submit a formal application. [...] The New York Times, which reported on the new policy on Thursday, notes that the newspaper market in Japan is radically different from that in the US. Although some smaller outlets are experimenting with new ways of reaching readers, most papers require subscriptions to access online content, and the barriers have kept circulation of print editions quite high compared to the US. Nikkei management appears worried that links could provide secret passages to content that should be safely behind the paywall, and this fear has led to the new approval policy."
If (RefererURL is not OurURL) or (ReferURL is Authorized) then {show denialpage;} else {show content;}
It's their site and they can do it if they want to... paywall nets cash but costs views and ad yen. Let's see where this ends up.
I remember when I was willing to shell out a few bucks a year for a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, our American business paper. And then Rupert Murdoch bought it and turned it into Pravda with better paper.
Now, I'm not saying that the Japanese Nikkei is any better (yes, I am), but you have to understand that in Japan there is a strict code of honor that everyone implicitly abides by. This is why there is so little petty crime and violence there compared to the U.S. It's also why people are willing to pay for music rather than download it. The penalty for disobedience and "going your own way" is social ostracization.
So it makes sense in the Japanese worldview to demand a virtual face-to-face meeting in order to link to information and stories. The linker is a supplicant who must throw himself at the feet of the information "daimyo". To do any less would shame both the supplicant and the lord.
I'm not saying it's a good thing, but it's how it is over there. Over here, we're free to say stuff like "FIX YOUR FUCKING WEBSITE, YOU IDIOTS! IT'S BEEN BROKEN FOR HOURS!"
It sounds like this site requires that user be logged in to view articles, and so links to the articles shouldn't hurt them anyway. But they don't think their security is up to snuff, and so links might be able to get around the paywall, and they work around this with unenforceable linking policies.
Seriously while I agree collecting news and dispersing it is quite costly, the realistic value of MOST of the news out there is next to nothing.
For example a news article about a news site charging money for news. WOW that is news to me.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Ummm..."the barriers have kept circulation of print editions quite high compared to the US"...? Circulation of papers in Japan has always been ridiculously higher in Japan than in the US. Some of those papers have daily circulations of eight figures---no American paper has ever achieved circulation figures like that, past or present. The local paper that I get (the Shizuoka Shinbun) has a daily circulation of over 700,000 (vs 900,000 for the New York Times), and it's not even read nationally like the Yomiuri, Mainichi, Asahi, Nikkei, etc.
There are certain forums (free as in beer in many cases) that require registration to even read. If you reach one of their pages thru a link, you are redirected to a "You have to register to see this" page.
I'm talking about free forums using a template in many cases.
So this newspaper in Japan that is being paid cannot do the same? Is their IT department full of idiotic monkeys in crack so that they can't implement a simple check to see if the user is logged in (thus paying) or not?
Perhaps my understanding of the World Wide Web is flawed, naïve, or both, but I don't think it works this way.
Wasn't one of the premises of the WWW to be able to hyperlink to anything you want, anything at all, and the underlying technology designed to reflect this idealogy?
If I'm wrong, please educate me.
rms@susebox:~> wget --referer="http://www.theirsite.com/" "targetURL"
The largest prime factor of my UID is 263267.
So, if the address of their website cannot be published without a fee, the what of their physical address and phone number? Do students and scholars also need to pay to cite them in a paper?
Stuff like this makes me wish the Referrer and User-agent HTTP headers were disabled by default. It seems like they have zero benefit for users, and are merely used as stupidly weak forms of access control.
I'll just keep reading other english/japanese dailies like MDN which have better content. Or any of the local papers which you can google out, not to mention actual commentary about what's going on. I think the last time I read Nikkei related was in 2001.
Om, nomnomnom...
No its not, and that is scaring the shit out of the beancounters. You may not use all the free content out there but trust me there are at least 1000:1 free:paid content out there atm even if it is mostly people's blogs about their cat's sleeping habits and free Mp3s from really bad hipster bands. There are still awesome repositories of information for people like arxiv.org and wikipedia.
An Education is the Font of All Liberty
Such a thing may exist...check out the Kindle, nook, or iPad. I know that you can buy individual magazines from the iTunes store, and subscriptions aren't far behind. Now, the individual price is a bit of an issue at the moment, but it's a new market and will eventually settle out. DRM and lock-in may also be an issue for some (some on technical grounds, some moral...whatever) but there are sone options
Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
There are *secret passages* in them thar intertubes.
I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
Nikkei has had many many failed internet ventures, and this is just another one of their bad ideas that passed through their over-aged internet-illiterate bureaucracy.
I suspect this is more about politics within the market and about them preparing to strong arm those they think can be strong armed... It isn't like they're going to put up a notice, and sue all the referrers.
In the old days, a ton of Japanese web sites would have "link free" or "links not permitted" notices on their sites. For some reason, many felt the web was linked with permission, and that they had a say. As if anyone could do anything about outside links, when I would tell them the internet was all about free linking, and that you wouldn't put pages up that you didn't want linked in the first place, people would seem to get the idea...
This Nikkei thing is not about individuals linking to news articles. There site is practically unlinkable because they keep deleting stuff anyway.
"Secret passages" to content that should be safely behind the paywall? What are they on about? You can't magically link to a full article that's behind a login / subscription unless their site security code is very broken.
If there we doing this right then for non-logged in users they would show a brief intro to the article and a link to the login / subscribe forms.
I suggest to read the comments on Ars Technica - and even better follow all the link the said Newspaper:
http://www.nikkeieu.com/index_e.asp
http://e.nikkei.com/e/fr/tnks/Nni20100409D09EE596.htm
http://e.nikkei.com/e/fr/tnks/Nni20100409D09EE593.htm
http://www.nikkei.com//news/headline/related-article/g=96958A9C9381959FE2EAE2E7E28DE2EAE2E6E0E2E3E2E2E2E2E2E2E2;bm=96958A9C9381959FE2EBE2E6938DE2EBE2E6E0E2E3E29494E0E2E2E2
For me this sounds like a sure way to get lots of those "illegal" inbound links very fast.
the barriers have kept circulation of print editions quite high
Oh really? How do they know that? Citation please. This statement leapt out at me as wishful thinking. Of course the NYT would like to believe barriers will improve print circulation, as they are about to try it. I looked a little to see who made that statement. It seems the NYT was a bit more cautious and doesn't quite say that, it's Ars Technica's regurgitation that says that.
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
Ever heard of it? You know, that thing which forces a password check for a user session to anything contained in the directory tree...
We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
"the barriers have kept circulation of print editions quite high compared to the US." I am guessing the 2 or 3 pages of pr0n in most Japanese print newspapers doesn't hurt circulation either.
Submit and download your homegrown music on www.audiodropout.com
the newspaper market in Japan is radically different from that in the US. Although some smaller outlets are experimenting with new ways of reaching readers, most papers require subscriptions to access online content, and the barriers have kept circulation of print editions quite high compared to the US.
Another factor may contribute to stronger print circulation. Most Japanese commute to work by train, an environment that is very conducive to newspaper reading. Most Americans, in contrast, commute by car. One cannot comfortably or safely read a paper while driving. So Americans are more likely to read their news at their desk -- making internet often their preferred media.