Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu on a Dime

AussieNeil writes "If IBM had adopted Unix for its Personal Computer and supported open source so *nix desktops were the now the norm, how hard would it be to convince the population to switch to Microsoft Windows? In Ubuntu on a Dime — The Path to Low-Cost Computing, James Kelly shows how easy it is to build a computer and install a complete software suite for US$200 excluding monitor, keyboard, and mouse. You can't even buy the operating system and anti-malware protection for Microsoft Windows for that, let alone have any money left over for hardware and productivity software! Then when you install the software, you have the paradigm of having to restart the computer to complete software installation and you have to learn how to practice safe computing while budgeting for annual anti-malware software license renewals!" Read on for the rest of AussieNeil's review. Ubuntu on a Dime author James Floyd Kelly pages 280 publisher Apress rating 9/10 reviewer AussieNeil ISBN 1-4302-1972-6 summary takes you on a tour of the very best, but low-cost hardware, while only using zero-cost software in each of the many categories that matter to the typical PC user. Alternate histories aside, Ubuntu on a Dime is a tribute both to the skills of the author and to the decades of effort by those that have developed user friendly software and hardware, so that this 280-page book gives anyone with a reasonable level of self-confidence the recipe to build their own computer, install all the software needed for common activities, and quickly become productive.

James Kelly, spends just 30 pages in the first chapter explaining how to purchase the required computer parts and assemble a Ubuntu PC or "U-PC" computer and does it in a relaxed, easy-to-follow style. Mind, the task is simplified by choosing a motherboard with integrated sound and video, but that is exactly what you'll find in the standard corporate office PC. (Personally, I would have recommend purchasing a SATA hard drive to avoid the not-touched-on master/slave complications of using a shared IDE cable for the hard drive and CD/DVD drive.) The book is illustrated throughout with frequent, excellent screen shots as the author steps you through hardware assembly, then operating system and application installation, configuration, and use.

In chapter 2, the author explains how to install the Ubuntu operating system and keep it updated. Wisely, he has chosen the Long Term Supported 8.04 version, but has omitted mention of the different Ubuntu support periods. He has also missed an opportunity here to expand on the growing list of Ubuntu variants, in particular Kubuntu, which I would see as an easier migration choice for those familiar with Microsoft Windows.

Chapter 3 is dedicated to a definition of what the author means by "free software" and covers the costs (including the relevant security risk costs) associated with the four software categories; Pay-to-Use, Open Source, Cloud Computing, and Freeware. The remaining 9 chapters look at how to use free software — software either included in the default Ubuntu installation, or available via cloud computing — to complete common computing tasks.

In chapter 4, email using Evolution is covered and word processing, spreadsheets, and presentations using the OpenOffice.org suite is covered in chapters 5 to 7. The Cloud Computing Google Docs Office Suite alternative, with the advantages of everywhere access to your documents and collaborative working is covered in chapter 11. Web browsing using Firefox is covered in chapter 9, with most of the chapter dedicated to finding and installing useful add-ons. Google gets another couple of chapters when photo management with Picasa is covered in chapter 8 and Google Email and Calendar configuration and use are explained in chapter 10. The last chapter looks at a few other useful applications found in Ubuntu: Calculator, Text Editor, Notes, Disk Burning, Movie Playing, and Music Playing. The three appendices cover the computer parts list, three ways to obtain an installation disk for Ubuntu, and finally a bibliography of web sites, books, and must-have apps so you can extend the use of your new Ubuntu PC. The 9-page index is fairly comprehensive, considering the wealth of illustrations throughout the book.

I liked this book because it covered tasks seen daunting by many (PC building, operating system and software installation, configuration, and upgrading) in an light, easy-to-follow manner, supported with excellent illustrations. Further, the author covers a lot of ground without overwhelming the reader, taking you to a level where you can start using your computer productively and showing you how to use help files and online resources to extend your use of your excellent hand-built investment. While extolling the benefits of open source software, he hasn't labored the point. Vendor lock-in costs associated with proprietary office suites aren't mentioned, nor are the lower security risks associated with open source usage.

If you are looking for a way to reduce your computing costs, or know someone that would appreciate a gift that can help them achieve this, then Ubuntu on a Dime is well worth considering — particularly for anyone that gets satisfaction from learning via do-it-yourself.

You can purchase Ubuntu on a Dime: The Path to Low-Cost Computing from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

72 of 531 comments (clear)

  1. your first sentence is technically flawed by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unix wouldn't run on the original IBM PC, nor with any other cheap processor they might have instead of the Intel one.

    So given the IBM PC could only run lame program loaders in lieu of an actual operating system, we got what we got.

    1. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why stop at the first sentence when the title is flawed? Two hundred dollars != a dime!

    2. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unix wouldn't run on the original IBM PC, nor with any other cheap processor they might have instead of the Intel one.

      So given the IBM PC could only run lame program loaders in lieu of an actual operating system, we got what we got.

      Well, the 68000 CPU was available at that time. The Sun-1 systems ran SunOS 0.9, a port of UniSoft's UniPlus V7 port of Seventh Edition UNIX to the Motorola 68000 microprocessor in 1982.

      Xenix was running on Intel 80x86 hardware, and on 68000 & Zilog Z8001. Microsoft purchased a license for Version 7 Unix from AT&T in 1979, and announced on August 25, 1980 that it would make it available for the 16-bit microcomputer market. The initial port of Xenix to the Intel 8086/8088 architecture was performed by The Santa Cruz Operation.

      A couple of years later, RISC iX was running on ARM.

      LUnix can even run on a Commodore 64's 6510 CPU.

    3. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but Unix really does require a multi-tasking capability and memory management. You can dream about some assembly-language GUI (or no GUI Unixy thing) alternative to have run on the first PC, but it would not have been Unix.

      Unix *was* (barely) possible on the IBM AT, and indeed there were a couple (using kludgy trick for multitasking); I ran a Unix-like thing called Coherent

    4. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by washu_k · · Score: 5, Informative

      This has nothing to do with the skills (or lack there of) of programmers in 1982, but everything with the CPU features available. The 8088 and anything else IBM might have used did not support memory protection or any form of privilege separation. UNIX needs those features in hardware to run. Some early UNIX workstations added custom support chips to implement those features on the simple CPUs, but that would have priced the IBM PC out of its market.

      Yes, there are some specialized UNIX variants that will run on such limited hardware, but they don't support proper secuirty simply because they can't

      The original versions of Windows didn't have any memory protection or any concept of security or separate users. It wasn't designed to.

    5. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surprise! You don't understand operating systems.

    6. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Useful+Wheat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I went to college (4 years ago, if you were interested) we went to the salvation army and bought some massive 22 inch CRTs for $10. I bought 3. My Desktop had 2 huge screens, and I had a third over my bed that I doubled up as a TV.

      Seriously, go to salvation army for your ultra-cheap computing needs.

    7. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Applekid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Two hundred dollars != a dime!

      Inflation will fix that in time.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    8. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by gumbi+west · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That mentality really bothers me. I really hate organizations that give you 50 MB quota on your email. How much does a GB cost versus an hour of your employee's time?

    9. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by washu_k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Given that the 4.77 MHz 8088 needed several cycles just to calculate a memory address, a hypervisor being "fucking slow" is a gross understatement.

    10. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um... because it would have been fucking slow? I suspect most people wanted their computers back then to work, and do the job fast. After all, they cost a bomb and for the price, people wanted them to have performance to match. Plus I suspect most CPU's of the time didn't have the required support for a HV, after all, only recently have x86 CPU's got Virtualisation technology. I think for a HV you need a virtualised supervisor state in the CPU, which the CPU's didn't have back then.

      That's not to say they didn't know how to do it, they did. They even had Hypervisors running on mainframes (i.e. IBM) back in the 60's, Just now technology has advanced enough for just about everyone to have the ability.

    11. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's necessary for Unix, Amiga Unix (AMIX) required 68030 for MMU features.

      Running Linux or NetBSD on Amiga requires 68851 which could be had with several accelerator cards like 68020 + 68851

    12. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by alanw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of years later, RISC iX was running on ARM.

      Ah, memories of the Unix Kernel Validation Suite project I led for Acorn, March to October 1988. We started out writing it for BSD 4.2 on a Sun workstation with a "Winchester", until an A680 was available. A long, long time ago when I asked questions such as "what is the difference between Internet + ethernet?"

    13. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by WizarDru · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know. How many employees do you have? How much time do you have to back up their mailboxes? Archive them? Replicate them in a DR facility? Propagate them across the infrastructure? Index them on the server? Instance them? You're talking how much the drive space costs and ignoring infrastructure costs. Mind you, what kind of drive and where? Is it part of an array? Is it 15K, 10K, 7.5K or 5K speed? Is it being mirrored? And so on.

    14. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by lotec85 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you intentionally make that rhyme?

    15. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you intentionally make that rhyme?

      Would that be a crime?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    16. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be a good point, if it weren't wrong. There were several UNIX V7 ports or work-alikes. PC-IX, Xenix, Coherent, Minix to name a few. Some of them were even real branded UNIX based upon the AT&T sources.

      Unix didn't start out as a virtual memory based operating system with protected address spaces.

    17. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you intentionally make that rhyme?

      Would that be a crime?

      No.

      Just a waste of time.

    18. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not till the 286 AFAICR, the MMU in the 8086 was worthless. Real Unix needed at least a 386.

      There was no MMU in the 8086. But then again no MMU was required to run "Real Unix". Xenix was a Unix v7 port using the AT&T source, PC/IX was a Unix v7 port using the AT&T source. Coherent was a Unix v7 work alike. No MMU was necessary for any of them.

      Unless you want to rewrite history and claim that the first "Real Unix" was BSD or System V.

    19. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its amazing how much people leave out when they are writing histories. There's not a single mention of the best selling 68000 based Unix workstation of the 1980s in that article, TRS-80 Model 16 (aka Tandy 6000) running Xenix. But the Tandy machines were sold to accountants and small businesses. But we all remember Sun and Apollo, because Sun and Apollo sold their machines to geeks.

    20. Re:your first sentence is technically flawed by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to know which repositories to use or your installation fails, and which repositories support network installations is anything but obvious

      I've got 25 repositories enabled, and they're all on-line. Do a basic install off the dvd, then enable the online repositories and install everything else from there. I have between 3,000 and 4,000 packages installed, and I run into very few conflicts. a 13-gig update required me to make ONE choice.

      Lastly, Novell, and by association all versions of SuSe, lost my support when they made deals with the devil.

      So what cpu and motherboard are you running on? It can't be Intel or ARM or AMD ... and you certainly can't be using an iPhone or a Mac ...

  2. Hopefully $175 by nacturation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... after you buy the $25 book, that is. Anyone know if there's an open source "Ubuntu On a Dime on a Dime"?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Hopefully $175 by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya, it's called Google.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Hopefully $175 by JBrandonS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nuke the Starter Edition of Windows 7, reload with Ubuntu, Mint, or your choice of distro: $0, in about an hour.

      I run Gentoo you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Hopefully $175 by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      - Smaller screen (10"), but you can add an external one later if that bothers you.
      - Slightly smaller keyboard (though I'm 6' 4" with proportionally large hands, and I can type nearly as fast on a netbook as I can my laptop or Microsoft Natural keyboard), but again you can add one if you need it later.

      Of course, if you do those, then you just blew way past the $300 price point you were talking about. Also, although I didn't look at exactly what the specs on the two are, chances are that you're going to be getting more bang for your buck with the DIY desktop.

      If you want a portable computer, then a pre-built netbook or laptop is probably a better bet than trying to build your own. But if what you really want is a desktop, then getting a netbook and using it as a desktop probably isn't the best choice.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  3. Can't buy the OS for $200? by schnikies79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can buy OEM copies for significantly cheaper than that. Anti-virus/malware protection is a free download from Microsoft.

    I use what works for me, leaving dogma aside.

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was my thought too.

      Windows 7 Home Premium: $99.99 (or Professional for $140)
      Microsoft Security Essentials: $0.00
      Knowing your wireless card and webcam will work: Priceless

      Hm, that's a lot less than $200.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Informative

      But if I have to compile a new piece of software just to install it properly the first time, that's when *nixen completely fail the end user.

      You must not have recent experience with Ubuntu... or Opensuse, etc.

      You don't have to compile a single thing to get everything working. The package managers are quite nice, really.

      As far as automatic updates, it doesn't matter what operating system you use. Updates can and do occasionally hose things, whether it's Windows, OSX or Linux. So it's wise to *not* have auto updates on, rather read what each update is doing before letting it install.

    3. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      "What do you mean I can't run Bejeweled on it?!" -- Mom

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by tombeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I build up a Windows machine I allocate 3 days to getting everything working, tweaking the settings to my liking, installing software and AV (and rebooting at least once per each). When I am finished I have a machine that will run forever if you don't add or upgrade anything, even at an elementary daycare. When I install Ubuntu I figure about an hour for a mostly hands off install, then 2 hours to let updates run. Maybe an hour tweaking the UI. I have built many machines, maybe hundreds; I know which OS wastes my time and it isn't UNIX based.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    5. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you have not used ubuntu in the past 5 releases have you.

      Zero config.... Z-E-R-O. install software from the "install apps" button has Z-E-R-O skills needed. honestly, I handed my wife a laptop with a blank HDD and a ubuntu CD and she installed and configured it on her own.

      That would be IMPOSSIBLE with windows, even windows 7 required a ton of skill to get all hardware working, Ubuntu worked out of the box on her Dell D620 including the wifi card... no installing anything or configuring anything.

      Her only complaint was that Ubuntu wont blindly connect to wifi access points and iphone sync wont work.

      She has been using this configuration for 8 weeks now. she has no desire to go back to windows. she knows nothing about computers other than how to use them for typing, and internet.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by keeboo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was my thought too.

      Windows 7 Home Premium: $99.99 (or Professional for $140) Microsoft Security Essentials: $0.00 Knowing your wireless card and webcam will work: Priceless

      Hm, that's a lot less than $200.

      Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit 1-Pack for System Builders - OEM

      That's an OEM version. OEM licensing terms apply.
      Also, $99 for OEM Windows? That's a ripoff.

    7. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might be prudent to ask if you're being paid for three days of work to install a single windows machine.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    8. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Plus I've had the update manager tell me to restart after updating, so I don't get the idea that I'd never have to reboot Ubuntu after doing updates, that's just not true.

      Well, yes, there are occasional updates that require a reboot, such as the kernel. It's just that most programs don't need you to reboot the computer to complete the update as they often do in Windows.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by potat0man · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot the hardware.

    10. Re:Can't buy the OS for $200? by the_womble · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last time I looked a Windows CD cost about $2 where I live...

      Knowing your wireless card and webcam will work: Priceless

      That would mean not using Vista or Win 7.

  4. So who is the book for? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Building a PC from scratch? What FOSS is? How to use Ubuntu?

    I'm sorry, this doesn't sound like a particularly good book for *anyone*

    1. Re:So who is the book for? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, this doesn't sound like a particularly good book for *anyone*

      If it sells enough copies, it might be particularly good for the author . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:So who is the book for? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you want to make an PC from scratch, you must first create the universe.

    3. Re:So who is the book for? by cmiller173 · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG, "Scratch" is people!!!!

  5. Plenty of free AV options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it interesting how they add the cost of anti-malware not only once, but also say that you need to have ongoing license renewals in the yearly budget. Not only is Microsoft's own anti-malware completely free, there are other free options such as Avast and AVG as well. So technically, yes, you COULD pay for Symantec or McAfee, but adding the cost in as though it's the ONLY choice is disingenuous at best.

  6. paradigm of having to restart the computer? by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Then when you install the software, you have the paradigm of having to restart the computer to complete software installation and you have to learn how to practice safe computing while budgeting for annual anti-malware software license renewals!"

    Every time Ubuntu updates it asks me to reboot the machine, yet in Win7 I can update video card drivers and not have to restart. I'm not sure why you're claiming the opposite is true. Both systems require restarts for certain updates, but these days Win7 has Ubuntu beat in this area, hands down. Also there is no need to budget for annual anti-malware tools, because you can get many free AV suites. MS even offers one now, that tests better than the paid programs.

    1. Re:paradigm of having to restart the computer? by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time Ubuntu updates it asks me to reboot the machine

      Ubuntu pretty much only restarts for kernel updates, but if you install Ksplice, even those go away.

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
    2. Re:paradigm of having to restart the computer? by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Pretty much" is the key thing here. It pretty much only restarts for kernel updates, unless you've updated the video card drivers, the window manager, the x server, or any other complex part of the system. I run Ubuntu and Win7, and keep both up to date. Ubuntu has me restart far more than the Win7 machine.

    3. Re:paradigm of having to restart the computer? by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah technically you don't need to reboot, you just have to shut everything down, exit to command line, and restart everything...

    4. Re:paradigm of having to restart the computer? by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ubuntu/Fedora do ask to be restarted after some updates. Usually this isn't required, it's just that having the person restart their whole computer is easier than explaining to them how to restart a particular process like X in the case of a video driver update.

      The same can be said of Windows; it is usually just a particular service/process that needs restarted not the whole system.

  7. Don't under-estimate Acer by vrmlguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    build a computer and install a complete software suite for US$200 excluding monitor, keyboard, and mouse. You can't even buy the operating system and anti-malware protection for Microsoft Windows for that

    Permit me to introduce the Acer Aspire REVO. The base model (R1600-U910H - 1 GB RAM - 1.6 GHz - 160 GB HDD) can be had for $199.99 or less, and includes keyboard, mouse and Windows XP. Of course, I'm planning to install XBMC.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  8. Had IBM used UNIX by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Informative

    it wouldn't have been UNIX as you know it. The 8088 didn't have privilege levels, so essentially everything would run as root.

    1. Re:Had IBM used UNIX by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shhh, don't spoil the fun for the zealots. They love pretending that Unix folks had their shit together back then. It lets them believe that Microsoft won through some underhanded marketing bullshit instead of the fact that there were no realistic alternatives.

    2. Re:Had IBM used UNIX by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Informative

      "An x86 that can handle Unix dates back to 1985."

      Yes, but that was 4 years after the PC was introduced so IBM couldn't have used it.

  9. Re:Its all about the command line stupid.... by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that's funny because back when Microsoft software became ubiquitous on PC, there was "command line" required.

  10. Let the FUD begin by mcmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can't even buy the operating system and anti-malware protection for Microsoft Windows for that, let alone have any money left over for hardware and productivity software!

    Not true.

    Then when you install the software, you have the paradigm of having to restart the computer to complete software installation and you have to learn how to practice safe computing while budgeting for annual anti-malware software license renewals!"

    So you're saying people who use Ubuntu don't need to practice safe computing? That's great news! Next time I get an email from a Nigerian prince, I'll make sure I send him my account information with pine instead of Outlook, so then I'll be safe.

    1. Re:Let the FUD begin by biryokumaru · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we switched normal people from Outlook to pine, they probably would be safe from 419 scams.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Let the FUD begin by radish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed, but only because they couldn't read or send email anymore.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  11. What if... by singingjim1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Apple had licensed it's operating system to computer manufacturers like Windows did. While Windows wasn't "open source", it was certainly made more openly available. Bill Gates was just smarter at the time than Steve Jobs. You could play the what if game all day long with all sorts of scenarios.

  12. Re:Its all about the command line stupid.... by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is that funny?

    If I say you'll have no success trying to sell a car that doesn't go over 20 MPH, is it funny because 100 years ago no cars went over 20 MPH?

  13. I'm running Lucid Lynx. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's BETA software and it gets updates almost every single day.

    And yet even with running BETA software and pulling patches down almost every day I am NOT rebooting the system as you claim.

  14. Ludicrous by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    No way you could run Ubuntu on a dime. Dimes have no cpu, no video card, no ram. And where would you insert the liveCD?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  15. Re:Its all about the command line stupid.... by Jeng · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many games have what amounts to a command line. I would say that a good amount of people would have no problem using a command line interface IF they knew its uses.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  16. Re:Ubuntu? by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Funny

    We've asked you politely to stop posting here Mr. Balmer.

  17. Here's where you said it. by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where did I claim Ubuntu was having you reboot every day? I didn't.

    That would be when you posted this:

    Every time Ubuntu updates it asks me to reboot the machine, yet in Win7 I can update video card drivers and not have to restart.

    Note your usage or "Every time" in that statement.

    I pointed out that Lucid Lynx is receiving updates almost every day. Therefore, by your original statement, I should be rebooting it almost every day.

    That is not my experience. And that is with BETA software.

    1. Re:Here's where you said it. by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is not my experience. And that is with BETA software.

      Wow - imagine how much better off you will be if you install VHS!

  18. The cost of the OS is not the primary issue. by Delusion_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could run BeOS for free. And on today's machines, it would play the fastest game of Tetris ever.

    Jokes aside, who considers the price of the OS the primary issue? Way to miss the point. The primary issue is "does this OS run the applications I want to run".

    I encounter naive Linux desktop converts occasionally. And no, that's not to suggest all Linux desktop converts are naive. It's very frustrating to hear them pontificate about their latest install Ubuntu Malodorous Moose, and then on the other hand ask "what's the Linux equivalent of [some Windows application]?" every two days.

    If it doesn't run the applications I need to run, you could give me the OS for free and it still won't run them.

    Throwing in red herrings about what certain security apps cost when there are free alternatives for Windows is pretty disingenuous as well.

  19. Re:cost of acquisition is everything, huh? by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

    No disrespect intended, but that's really flamebait. Let's play.

    Frustration with overly technical administrative requirements is a cost.

    The whole point of this book is to reduce those requirements by explaining things. As stated in the review, it's apparently easy to follow.

    Having to ask other people how to do stuff all the time is a cost.

    So is a phone call to tech support, where you get told the stereotypical useless answer by a script-reader making slightly more than minimum wage. Posting a message on a forum, where you can get advice from a few dozen fellow users is more "bang for the buck", so to speak.

    Listening to overbearing geeks tell you how easy things you can't figure out are, is a cost.

    So is having to tell the tech support script-reader that your computer is really plugged in, you did push the right button, and the mouse is not being used as a foot pedal. There's remarkably few arrogant helpers like that, and they usually get chewed out by the benevolent ones.

    Having to find and download "free" software to do stuff MS users get with their machines, and then finding out it isn't quite the same, is a cost.

    Things included with Windows generally come installed in Ubuntu. Installation is two mouse clicks and typing one word, where Windows installations usually require serial numbers, a drive to the store, and other costs you conveniently ignore. Expecting everything to be in the exact same place after replacing a core component of you computer is a ridiculous requirement.

    Not being able to easily exchange docs and pictures with your nieces and nephews is a cost.

    If you're having problems running a basic email client, or even opening a file in OpenOffice, perhaps you shouldn't be using a computer in the first place. Maybe now is also a good time to mention the joyous pain of Microsoft Office's ever-changing file formats. Have you forgotten 2007 already?

    Do I need to go on?

    Nope. You've made your knowledge of the subject fully evident. Thanks for playing correct-a-troll, and have a nice day.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  20. Re:IDE HDD by daveime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to, but it's not 2011 yet.

    I know a lot of people will argue, seeing as we've been using zeros for a while now, but conventionally, the 21st century started on January 1st, 2001. Therefore the 21.1st century should start on January 1st, 2011.

  21. Book reviews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this a book review? It is a chapter-by-chapter summary followed by a one-liner that the guy likes the book. How about slashvertisement for a change??
     
    And how about a real book review, and how about reviewing books that are great and books that are terrible if you are going to have a whole section on it? Not that this is Barnes and Noble, but it doesn't make sense if you are only posting positive summaries of books every now and then.

    1. Re:Book reviews? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is this a book review? It is a chapter-by-chapter summary followed by a one-liner that the guy likes the book. How about slashvertisement for a change??

      It's "Ubuntu on a dime!" or - "You get what you pay for."

      Book that's great: "Programming Perl" (and I'm not even a big perl fan).

      Book that sucks enough that I want my money back: "Design Patterns" Read the first chapter, then close it, because it goes downhill from there.

      Biggest waste of money so far: "C++ Cookbook"

      Recommended reading: "Database System Concepts"

      +5 Informative: "Compiler Design in C"

      Sci-Fi: "The Past through Tomorrow (Heinlein)"

      Try the fish.

  22. Run as admin mentality by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft receives the brunt of the viruses because that is what people use.

    Or because commonly used software released in the Windows 98 and Windows XP eras expected to run with the privileges of the Administrators group. So home installations of Windows were less secure against unauthorized software changes than Linux until Microsoft copied the basic idea behind sudo in Windows Vista, encouraging new versions of apps to separate user- and administrator-level tasks.

    1. Re:Run as admin mentality by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually "Microsoft copied the basic idea behind sudo" in Windows XP, which is when they introduced the runas command. Third party software developers were slow to catch up; just last week I bought my daughter a game that popped up a "you need to be administrator to install this" message on installation (rather than simply having Windows prompt me for admin credentials).

  23. Re:The driver is on the disc by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're going to cite one specific Microtek scanner? Really?

    What percentage of scanners manufactured in the past 10 years work today in Windows 7?

    I wager a higher percentage is supported in Linux.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  24. Re:It's not about $ by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative
    She doesn't have to know how to test if her IP Address is good. She doesn't have to update drivers.

    My sister runs Ubuntu. She neither knows how to do either of those tasks nor ever has had to. She gets a good IP address at boot by DHCP from our router, just as she would if she were running Windows. As far as updating drivers, the only driver she has to worry about is the proprietary nVidia driver for her graphics card, and Ubuntu takes care of that for her whenever there's a kernel update. It Just Works.

    Me, I prefer Fedora. I also an nVidia card, but with Fedora, I use kmod-nvidia (and the akmod as well) meaning that I never have to worry about updating drivers either. Nice try, but your FUD fell flat.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  25. $200 doesn't really include.. by kuzb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sysadmin to go with it.

    Ubuntu is all well and good until you need something that is not covered by its package manager. It's all well and good until some piece of hardware only has limited support via some hack.

    The problem with Linux is that even with all the advancements, it's still a fragmented platform that only works properly if you stay within it's narrow selection of hardware that is known to work.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.