Slashdot Mirror


Meteor Spotted Yesterday Over Midwestern United States

the1337g33k writes "The National Weather Service is reporting that a fireball that many people witnessed last night is a meteor that entered the atmosphere last night around 10:10 pm Central Time. This meteor was spotted by many in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois."

163 comments

  1. Calm down, fanboys by Antidamage · · Score: 5, Funny

    It wasn't an Autobot.

    1. Re:Calm down, fanboys by athe!st · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then there is only one other possibilty!

    2. Re:Calm down, fanboys by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please tell me it doesn't involve Bruce Willis.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Calm down, fanboys by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny
    4. Re:Calm down, fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think not of Bruce Willis, but rather Tom Cruise (Gene Barry?)

    5. Re:Calm down, fanboys by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      ...it's the chevy nova...lighting up the night sky...

      ---Fry

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:Calm down, fanboys by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Was it God in a fly past looking for a place to land?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    7. Re:Calm down, fanboys by archmcd · · Score: 1

      Are we sure this wasn't scrappy young Dustin Pedroia's 4th home run?

      My apologies for bringing up sports on /.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    8. Re:Calm down, fanboys by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Then there is only one other possibilty!

      It's a bird! It's a plane! It's... oh, it's a meteor. Never mind.

  2. I thought by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Funny

    this was just GameStation coming to claim their recently acquired souls..

    1. Re:I thought by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      The going rate for a soul: £5 GBP

    2. Re:I thought by doogledog · · Score: 1

      As opposed to £5 USD or $5 GBP?

    3. Re:I thought by EvilErik · · Score: 0

      Well the Egyptian Pound uses the £ sign as well, so qualifying GBP seems reasonable.

  3. Large Meteor Yesterday Over Midwestern US... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    ...Thousands of people caught at awkward moments now traumatized for life.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Large Meteor Yesterday Over Midwestern US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like?

    2. Re:Large Meteor Yesterday Over Midwestern US... by WindowlessView · · Score: 1

      If he's hinting at what I think...no one on slashdot.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    3. Re:Large Meteor Yesterday Over Midwestern US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's hinting at what I think...no one on slashdot.

      You're probably right. Anybody who noticed it was probably burning the midnight oil doing something else other than that... Yeah, that's it.

    4. Re:Large Meteor Yesterday Over Midwestern US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...burning the midnight oil doing something else other than that... Yeah, that's it.

      What, filing their taxes late? I don't get it...

  4. Could Be Worth Some Money by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just a hint to any slashdotters in that area, a few of my friends a couple years back watched a small meteor impact up near Sonora Pass in California. It was close by so they took a weekend and went camping up on the pass. They wandered about relatively aimlessly looking for any rocks that seemed odd or out of place. When they found a suspect, they used some magnets they had brought to see if it was ferrous. Eventually, they found one small chunk of rock (think size of your hand) that the magnet stuck to out of sheer luck. They brought it back, had it evaluated by someone (can't recall who, but someone at a nearby university), and ended up selling it for just over $1000 since it was, legitimately, a small chunk of the meteor. If any dotters have a taste for adventure and have a weekend to kill near the area that this impacted, you should go out and see what you can find. It might pay off.

    1. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by AnonymousClown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone else hear the Indiana Jones Theme after reading the parent?

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    2. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by jd · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to "Meteorite Men", the Geek version of Home Shopping Network, meteorite fragments are worth $20/gram as a basic value. If you get a big piece that has shape to it, you could expect more. Multiple fragments that fit together (where it fragmented in the atmosphere, not from a hammer) would also logically fetch more, as would rare types.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would you sell something like that?

      It's a once in a lifetime find (potentially) and i'd want to keep it on my shelf somewhere. It'd be a great coffee table piece.

    4. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by phizix · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of the meteor trail was captured here by NWS weather radar. The end of this trail might be a good place to start.

    5. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I just sold my magnets collection on eBay!

    6. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

          There was a good show on this, I believe on the Discovery Channel. There's an art (and science) to searching debris fields. They had assembled a large loop to be a metal detector attached to a PVC pipe frame that they dragged behind their truck. If you know the direction it came in, and a likely impact site, you can start hunting. You have an advantage that you know at least one part of the debris field. I'd guess that area is mountainous, so a tow behind metal detector is probably out, but you and a few friends doing a grid search with metal detectors may be able to find something useful. If it's been a few years (like more than 3), since you know the location of one piece, you may be able to spot impact craters with Google Maps.

          You got $1k for a chunk the size of your hand. What if you collected a truck full of them? I'd offer to play, but I'm a couple thousand miles beyond coming out to search.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by dachopigu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Was there a blob inside?

    8. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be a great coffee table piece.

      You are just against science.

    9. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by yotto · · Score: 1

      Other than the cash (Who wouldn't want the cash?) there's that whole pesky contributing to science thing.

      I'd take a billion pictures of it and then sell it to the highest bidder.

    10. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you happen to find any glowing green crystals please do not sell them to an evil looking bald guy, however lucrative the offer may be.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    11. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      If any dotters have a taste for adventure and have a weekend to kill near the area that this impacted, you should go out and see what you can find. It might pay off.

      FYI - Before you go wandering around the hillsides looking for rocks, keep in mind that anything you find properly belongs to the landowner.

      Proper rock hunters spend a lot of effort to get all the proper permissions for their searches.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    12. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over on reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/bracp/video_of_huge_fireballmeteor_above_the_midwest/

      "it landed a couple of miles from me in mankato MN! took out a part of a trailer home. here's some pictures a friend of mine took.

      http://imgur.com/IpUyc.jpg

      http://imgur.com/dVUNH.jpg

      http://imgur.com/gTc1f.jpg"

    13. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      incredible pictures! not only are they well lit and in focus, but they clearly show the carnage left behind by this meteor! has your friend considered photo journalism?

    14. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by lemur3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no no... I heard the Star Wars theme........... or maybe it was the theme from Superman........

    15. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Rehnberg · · Score: 1

      Senior camping trip!!!

    16. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It's a once in a lifetime find (potentially)"

      Go out to the Lucerne dry lake bed, or any desert spot in southern California, and with a good pair of binocs you can pretty much just spot them sitting out in the open.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      Project 39 agrees.

    18. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Oh Clark, what are you worried about?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    19. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by robot256 · · Score: 1

      no, but i did after reading your post. and it made sense, too.

    20. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by martas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how is this "insightful"??? funny yes, but who the hell would... AAH! that's it, i'm declaring myself insane...

    21. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you happen to find any glowing green crystals please do not sell them to an evil looking bald guy, however lucrative the offer may be.

      Too late! However, the lively gentlemen gave me a dozen copies of Windows 7 and a really handsome chair.

    22. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      and ended up selling it for just over $1000 since it was, legitimately, a small chunk of the meteor.

      and all I got was a T-shirt with a burnt hole.
         

    23. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      My mom, between Waterville and Faribault, saw a piece falling and called me. Said it was coming down, not across. Pretty cool. I don't think she's up for hunting it down, though.

    24. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Jordy youve gone an done it now...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083767/

    25. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any dotters have a taste for adventure and have a weekend to kill near the area that this impacted, you should go out and see what you can find. It might pay off.

      FYI - Before you go wandering around the hillsides looking for rocks, keep in mind that anything you find properly belongs to the landowner.

      Proper rock hunters spend a lot of effort to get all the proper permissions for their searches.

      Does this hold true for all land, or just private property? If this were a public park, would it be permissible?

    26. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      Meteor shit!

      Oh, Jordy Verrill, you lunkhead!

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    27. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE- It came from space? Because it landed on someone elses property it becomes theres? I can understand you are trespassing MAYBE. Depending on where you are though the law doesn't necessarily mean you can't cross another land though. If they don't have fences or signs.

    28. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      or there will be alien bacterias you when you touch it you die!

    29. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come? It wasn't there when they acquired the property, hence it's not part of their property... It's like saying the car I parked on my neighbors lawn is now his..? Maybe I'm just too logical about this, law never is... Trespassing and excavating, that's another story..

    30. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the highest bidder is surely a scientist.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    31. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      I'd guess that area is mountainous

      And I'm guessing that you've never been anywhere near Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa or Indiana

    32. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      If, instead of a meteorite, you find a very large cylinder, you should run away.

    33. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          What exactly would those places have to do with Sonora Pass in California? What I do know of California landscape is that there are vast areas of flat lands, and mountainous areas. I lived in a house on the outskirts of Los Angeles that if you stepped off the back porch, you were on a > 45 degree incline down a couple hundred feet. That was just a foothills area. Not far from there, you could drive up to 7,000 feet, and if you were to go very far off the road (5 to 50 feet), you'd find yourself falling at least 1,000 feet to the next thing resembling flat land. It's fun to climb on, but it's also a regular event where search and rescue has to go in by helicopter to extract a hiker who miscalculated their walk.

          Being that it's called "Sonora Pass", that would usually indicate that it's a pass through the mountains, but I didn't want to say that positively that it was on a mountainous area, since it could have been in a flat lands part. ... and I've been to 36 states in the United States, 4 Canadian providences, 2 other countries, and visited one of the 7 natural wonders of the world. Does your statement imply I haven't seen enough places to know terrain varies by location?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    34. Re:Could Be Worth Some Money by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Would a tree that grows on their land after they buy it not be theirs?

  5. It's an IFO! by lloy0076 · · Score: 1

    An Identified Flying Object...FLEE!

  6. 15 minutes or 15 seconds? by Torrance · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The CNN article states that the fireball was visible for about 15 minutes. That seems awfully long for a meteor.

    1. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I just saw the video on TV a couple hours ago. I was joking that it wasn't a meteorite. There are distinct flashes that were its deceleration thrusters firing. :) I love starting conspiracy theories. :)

          For what I saw of it, CNN probably screwed up when they said 15 minutes. Otherwise, it would have spun half way around the world on its entry.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by rm999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently 15 minutes: http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5614609-meteor-stands-still-for-15-minutes-in-iowa-pictures

      People of Iowa and neighboring cities were surprised by a meteor shower on Wednesday night. The fireball resembling meteor is captured in a picture by an Iowa resident - that is believed to be a part of the meteor shower. This meteor wasn't like a flash - it appeared at 10 p.m. and stayed there for good 15 minutes!

      According to the National Weather Service, the meteor was moving from west to east and before it reached the horizon, it broke up into smaller pieces and was lost from sight. Iowa was not the only place where this meteor was seen, but Wisconsin, Ohio, Missouri and Indiana also witnessed the fireball. It is still not confirmed by experts what caused the meteor fireball to stay in the sky like that or whether it would have hit the ground or not. It was definitely an exciting site in Iowa.

    3. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Informative

      15 minutes is a looooong time. For how long would you be able to make out a jet air-liner?

      Since the meteor was making multiple sonic booms (realistically that's really bits breaking off and making their own booms), we're looking at a minimum of mach 1. That means it'll cover an absolute minimum distance of 306 km from the time it was first seen as standing still until it disappeared. Now, obviously the object needs to be at a fair distance already, for that to be the case. It can't start overhead, as that will mean it's moving.

      And how far can you really see?

      [The record] belong to the report of the expedition led by Korzenewsky (1923), who reliably reported seeing snow-capped peaks of a mountain range 750 km away.

      Also, 306 km is a HUGE distance. The smallest detail we can make out are about 1 arc minute. At 306 km that is 89 meters. Granted, it's glowing/burning, so that should help, but how much? 10 fold? Would you be able to make out a 9 meter fireball at 300 km?

      And I'm rather curious to know, just how far a meteor would actually travel during those 15 minutes.

    4. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Granted, it's glowing/burning, so that should help, but how much? 10 fold?

      Depends.

      If it's really dark out (think: rural area at night), you can make out a standard incandescent handheld flashlight (not in detail, but you can see that there's a light there) from a couple of miles away.

      The absolute brightness of the object definitely matters. Betelgeuse for instance appears MUCH brighter than Proxima Centauri, despite being some 160 times as far away.

      I don't know exactly how much light a burning chunk of rock emits during atmospheric entry (probably depends somewhat on the composition of the rock), but I'm pretty sure it's a lot more than a handheld flashlight.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is sort of my point. I'm extremely sceptical that it is possible to see any meteor for 15 minutes, unless it has landed and you're staring at it.

      It's entry speed is a minimum of 11 km/s. Obviously it will slow down, but what is the longest possible route it can take through the atmosphere? I.e. we know the height of the atmosphere that matters (as far as I remember, they don't start burning until they're below 90 km).

      And even if completely unrealistic, we'd also need it to pretty much skim the surface (i.e. 0 km) for it to have the longest trail.

      Essentially this gives us a triangle with a opposite of 6,371 km, hypotenuse of 6,461 km. This gives us an adjacent of sqrt(6,461^2 - 6,371^2) = 1,074 km.

      Now, this is the longest possible distance it can travel through the atmosphere from straight overhead until it leaves the atmosphere. A realistic height is say ... 25 km. Now we're looking at sqrt(6,461^2 - 6,396^2) = 914 km.

      Again, the lower limit of speed is way above Mach 1. It won't be burning at Mach 1. It's not even burning at Mach 3, as the SR71 doesn't do that, at at Mach 3 you're covering 918 km in 15 minutes, which is longer than the distance traveled. Granted, I haven't included the added distance from being pulled into a temporary orbit, because ... well, I haven't a clue how to. And this is an overhead to atmospheric exit distance, not a path that would leave an observer to believe that it isn't moving. To cover that distance, you'd need to at a minimum be pulled into low earth orbit, which requires a speed of 7.7 km/s, and at that speed we're covering the unrealistic 1,074 km in 139 seconds. And since we don't have any kind of engine on the meteor, it'd have to end up at that speed, making the average speed even higher and the time in atmosphere even shorter.

      This is why I'm very sceptical about the claim, that you could see a non-moving meteor for 15 minutes. It's quite simply going to be burned up, out of the atmosphere or in the ground after 15 minutes.

    6. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Apparently 15 minutes: http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5614609-meteor-stands-still-for-15-minutes-in-iowa-pictures

      Another thing ... where is the substantiating claims in that article? It's just some guy claiming it.

      There are no links to any other reports, no pictures to substantiate the claim, nothing.

      In other news, people in Iowa have seen purple flying pigs carrying off an SUV.

    7. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      You're wrong about much of what you said, but if I can pick on one point in particular:

      ... It's not even burning at Mach 3, as the SR71 doesn't do that, ...

      The heat that an SR-71 endures at that speed retempers the metal of its skin every time it flies, it's that hot. If it was made out of less heat-tolerant stuff, it most certainly would burst into flame. A piece of rock, not engineered to withstand high temperatures but simply made up of the random assortment elements it is, is almost certainly going to be flaming if it's going at Mach 3 for many minutes, unless you've wrapped it in some very good heat shielding first. Most meteors do not come so packaged.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by boliboboli · · Score: 1

      About 15 years ago I watched a meteor shower from about 9,000' elevation north of Durango Colorado at Vallecito lake. Although the meteors I watched were much smaller than the one we are talking about here, I watched several of them bounce off the atmosphere like a stone skipping on water actually going back upwards as they burned.

      If the trajectory of this meteor was not steep, I think it could easily skim across the atmosphere for as long it did with enough mass.

    9. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      According to the Wikipedia entry on the SR-71, the canopy would top 300C, but then goes on to say this:

      In addition, at Mach 3.2 cruise the external heat rise due to the compression of air on the vehicle creating a surface heat well above 500 F (260 C)[34] and would even heat up the inside of the windshield to 250 F (120 C) and cooling of the crew members was vital

      But at what temperatures will a rock meteor start melting, let alone burn? Lava is typically 700 to 1,200 C, but that's still not burning up. The tiles on the space shuttle hits about 1,300 C, and they're not burning up - they're just causing the air to burn. Though I suspect it's actually a matter of the air being super heated into plasma, as the space shuttle and other re-entry vehicles are cut off from radio traffic while they're 'burning' through the atmosphere. That makes no sense if it's a fire, but makes perfect sense with plasma.

      However, I am certainly willing to accept that I am in the wrong about the temperatures, but I haven't seen anything that would indicate that it is possible for a meteor to stay in the Earth's atmosphere for 15 minutes without it being on the ground.

    10. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Just to expand it a bit, I just stumbled across this link:

      The Great Daylight 1972 Fireball.

      One of four scientifically observed Earth grazing fireballs.

      Speed before the encounter was 15.083 +- 0.019 km/s, and afterwards it was 14.208 +- 0.005 km/s. This is the slowest one on the list, and it would travel 12,600 km in 15 minutes. Even at half that speed, there is no way you can observe anything at 6,000 km distance, unless it's straight up, in which case it's not glowing any more and thus impossible to see.

    11. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by mbone · · Score: 1

      If true, that's a "persistent train" and is caused by spectral lines from excited plasma recombining and going back into the ground state.

    12. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      blows whistle to announce time-out

      Well, it certainly has been INteresting seeing all the speculation about what could cause a meteor to "stand still" for 15 minutes but, guyz, it's just typical badly-worded journalistic/blogish cluelessness. MOST fireballs leave persistant smoke trails in the sky and if the upper-level winds are quiet those trails can last a LONG time.
      Haven't any of you ever seen a meteor shower and caught sight of a fireball?? Any of you??? Anyone????

      Never mind. It was Eevil Republicans. Eevil Christian Republicans. Eevil Christian Tea Party Republicans. Sorry to have interrupted.

      blows whistle to announce time-in

    13. Re:15 minutes or 15 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The physics of this are just plain impossible. Lets assume it really did take 15 minutes for this "meteor" to streak about 500 miles from west Iowa to east Indiana. Factoring in a vertical descent of 200 miles (the entire height of the atmosphere), it would have traveled 538 miles total from the time of encountering any air to hitting the ground. Lets add in another few miles to account for any arc in the trajectory. 550 miles in 15 minutes is just over 2000mph, which is around mach 3. That is actually slower than the SR-71 could fly. SR-71 had to be made of titanium and have a special special glass to withstand temps around 600 degrees F. This level of heat is due to friction with the earths atmosphere. Air in front a fast moving object is compresed and that creates heat. Friction is the only factor which causes meteors to burn. The problem is that an object has to be heated to over 2200F to glow "white hot". Furthermore, Iron (the chief element found in meteors) only starts to melt at about 2800F. It would start to glow a slight red color at around 712F- but certainly not bright enough to light up the night sky. This object was glowing extremely brightly and it clearly exploded at some point which implies huge amounts of thermal energy. A meteor traveling as slow as this object could not possibly encounter enough friction to cause glowing, sublimation and a massive explosion. If objects burned up at those speeds then a 30-06 rifle bullet would be a meteor. Certainly an object could enter the atmosphere at these low speeds... but unless it was already glowing, it just could not get hot enough to behave like that.

  7. Am I the only one... by cobryce · · Score: 0

    ...whose first thought was Superman? (Kal-El, Clark Kent, etc) You've got method of transportation, same approximate time, and same approximate location...

  8. Great video from Milwaukee by andytrevino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fox11 News in Milwaukee has a dramatic video of the meteor taken looking slightly north of west in downtown Milwaukee, WI.

    Any idea where it actually landed? DID it actually land -- or just burn up in the atmosphere?

    1. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      It landed, but was towed away for not having a parking permit.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by phizix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And here is another great view of the fireball from Madison.

    3. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

      I Saw it pretty clear here in Iowa City out the window to the North... if it was ALSO north of Wisconsin, My guess would by Canada... or the patrol officer didn't know which way North was-

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    4. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's seven meteors in a row following exactly the same trajectory. What are the chances? Astronomical!

    5. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by Xachariah · · Score: 1

      According to news sources it landed in Smallville, Kansas.

    6. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by g00set · · Score: 2, Funny

      The video clearly gives "balanced coverage" (poke at the advertisement) of the meteor event. Not sure how to describe the looping ;)

      --
      ... and furthermore ... I don't like your trousers.
    7. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox11 News in Milwaukee has a dramatic video of the meteor taken looking slightly north of west in downtown Milwaukee, WI.

      Any idea where it actually landed? DID it actually land -- or just burn up in the atmosphere?

      You missed the Fox News headline, "Obama's budget soars over the midwest, thousand watch in horror".

    8. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      FYI Fox 11 is Green Bay, WI. Fox 6 is Milwaukee, WI.

    9. Re:Great video from Milwaukee by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And is currently at Guantimo being questioned about its acts of terror.

  9. REFLEX Save DC 22. by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    "That's no fireball!"

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:REFLEX Save DC 22. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a black guy!

  10. Oblig. by russlar · · Score: 1

    "This isn't a meteor, it's what we call a 'Boeing Bomb'. You see this peanut?"

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
    1. Re:Oblig. by socz · · Score: 1

      Awww and I ate off of it!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  11. Planetary defense by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One day we'll be able to predict events like this. You'll see something in the sky, go to a website, or pull up an app on your smart phone, and it'll have a designation based on when it was first detected and the flight path that object took to hit the atmosphere. Maybe the website will look something like this, but hopefully not ;) Tracking small rocks like this might seem like a waste of time, until we predict one that is going to hit a major populated area - lives could be saved. This would be a side-benefit of the real purpose of the program - detecting planet killer sized hazards and preparing for the day when we need to divert one. The economic benefits of capturing asteroids in orbit and utilizing the materials should also be considerable.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Planetary defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and if we can land a shuttle on it and have it hit a big trampoline we can sling shot to Mars and save all that fuel!

    2. Re:Planetary defense by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's some tether concepts for trading delta-v with asteroids that could both be used to divert them or to provide slingshot maneuvers.. but more likely is to use the asteroid as fuel - most asteroids are believed to be between 50 and 80% water by mass.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Planetary defense by Rehnberg · · Score: 1

      The economic benefits of capturing asteroids in orbit and utilizing the materials should also be considerable.

      Provided, of course, that someone doesn't mess up the calculation and it hits us...

    4. Re:Planetary defense by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Anything under a few tons is perfectly safe.. as the article says, objects of this size hit our atmosphere all the time.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Planetary defense by andcal · · Score: 1

      Tracking small rocks like this might seem like a waste of time, until we predict one that is going to hit a major populated area - lives could be saved.

      I don't know, It's one thing to know when a small rock will hit the earth, and another thing to predict where it will hit within a few miles. And then yet another thing entirely to know where to send all of the evacuees. It it looks like it will hit Dallas, do we completely evacuate the whole metroplex? And how far do they go? If you are not careful, it may hit wherever people evacuated to and kill more people than had everyone stayed put.

      --
      --something witty
  12. Another one spotted last night. by TechwoIf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was on my way home last night very late, around 11pm and saw a meter streak about 1/4 the way across the sky. Normally I see them flash a white streak across the sky and burn up quickly, but this one stayed non-white burning stage for a long time and rather slow across the sky. I lost sight of it near the horizon and wonder if that one hit the ground. My location was south central west Indiana and looking east.

  13. I saw the meteor by cat_jesus · · Score: 5, Informative

    None of the video I've seen comes close to the spectacular sight. There was a huge tail of plasma and it was green, orange white with a hint of blue. It was huge and looked like it was close by.

    1. Re:I saw the meteor by martas · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure that the tail was composed of normal gases and dust, not plasma. i'd think that the heat from the meteor would dissipate too quickly in the atmosphere to for a trail of plasma to be visible.

    2. Re:I saw the meteor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was huge and looked like it was close by."

      THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID!

    3. Re:I saw the meteor by mbone · · Score: 1

      What you see is a plasma - the air (plus whatever is vaporized from the meteor itself) is both ionized (making a plasma) and disassociated (i.e., molecular bonds are broken). That's why it conducts, so in the radio is a good reflector (of radar) and is opaque (causing a communications blackout for reentering spacecraft).The colored tails (AKA persistent trains) that are reported (and can last a long time, as apparently happened with this one) are spectral lines emitted from gas combining back into molecules, or by excited electrons falling back into the ground state.

    4. Re:I saw the meteor by cswan · · Score: 1

      The video above does it some justice. I was quite a distance away (St. Louis), though it sure looked like it was falling nearby. Bright, traffic-light green body and tail, lasting maybe 5-6 seconds of its descent. When the object disintegrated it burst into a ball of yellow/orange, and looked not unlike the explosive, expanding shells they put off during the 4th of July.

      Awesome sight. The trajectory must have been very horizontal for the tail to have been so long, and it must have disintegrated very high up in the atmosphere for it to be viewable over such a large area.

    5. Re:I saw the meteor by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Yes I had just walked out onto my deck and was in shock for several seconds not understanding what I was quite seeing at first. It was huge, and from it's speed I could tell it was still at least several hundred miles away from me.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
  14. meteor? you mean.... by corbettw · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's no moon.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  15. Pieces will be found by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would bet that pieces will be found of the meteor. FIrst, the orbit / path will be well known, with so many multiple videos of it from different locations.

    Second, astronomer Mark Hammergren, of the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, predicts that it may have weighed as much as 1000 pounds.

    "One of the misconceptions about bright meteors is that they're due to very tiny objects," said Hammergren. But "if something is bright enough to light up the sky like daytime and cause sonic booms throughout the entire area, it's big. It was major," he said. "If it was daytime, people would have undoubtedly seen smoke trails."

    I think that this is very sound reasoning. Happy hunting to rockhounds in Wisconsin !

    Now, why do we never get such multiple confirmations of UFOs ?

    1. Re:Pieces will be found by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0

      Now, why do we never get such multiple confirmations of UFOs ?

      Well, we certainly have multiple-witness sightings. Lots of them, in fact. Hundreds involving pilots, police, military personnel as well as countless regular civilians, but the media is loathe to cover such stories, probably because biased, timid and over-ridden people are working the various editorial desks.

      Read Richard M. Dolan if you want to know the actual state of things.

      -FL

    2. Re:Pieces will be found by mbone · · Score: 1

      Look at this object. Within minutes, there are multiple independent video recordings of it from all over (basically true for every large meteor over an occupied area for the last decade or more), a path will be determined within hours to days, and pieces are likely to be found in short order.

      I simply do not care about any UFO report from the past decade that does not meet that standard. Find multiple, independent surveillance camera or other video views of it, and I am interested. If you don't have that then you are wasting your time and breath IMHO.

    3. Re:Pieces will be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Washington_D.C._UFO_incident

    4. Re:Pieces will be found by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      I simply do not care about any UFO report from the past decade that does not meet that standard. Find multiple, independent surveillance camera or other video views of it, and I am interested. If you don't have that then you are wasting your time and breath IMHO.

      And I'm just pointing out that this exists, with the one simple proviso that it is not being placed conveniently in your lap for review with the shining stamp of social approval. Do you always let other people's fear levels determine what is "real" for you? If so, then that's actually quite normal. I just find it limiting, and prefer to think for myself since most people are frightened, delicate creatures all too ready to behave in a manner rationally counter to the demands of reality in order to stay in the good books with the herd.

      -FL

    5. Re:Pieces will be found by berbo · · Score: 1

      A peanut-sized piece of the meteor that streaked across Wisconsin skies Wednesday night has been discovered near Livingston in the southwest corner of the state, according to UW-Madison scientists.

      http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/environment/article_d1877c36-4997-11df-a968-001cc4c03286.html

    6. Re:Pieces will be found by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Now, why do we never get such multiple confirmations of UFOs ?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephenville,_Texas#2008_UFO_sightings

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Pieces will be found by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      Do you always let other people's fear levels determine what is "real" for you?

      Are you always so gullible that you fall for wild claims in printed works simply because they're printed?

      It's important to remember that UFO means "Unidentified Flying Object." That can be anything: A bird, a plane, or debris of various sorts. It's unlikely to be extraterrestrial with the rare exception of space debris.

      Worse, your source Mr. Dolan is a nutjob. He's an entertainer first and foremost. Of course, you're free to believe what you wish. That is, after all, what some fringe sites like ATS are for.

      Naturally, the typical retort of those--like you--who believe such things as extensive government cover-ups of alien life is that no mainstream scholars will bother investigating UFOs because they're being bribed, threatened, brainwashed, remotely-controlled by an implanted device, or some other ridiculous claim. It's easy to appeal to something that cannot be proven (or disproven), but by that merit alone your theory fails the falsification test.

      The government is lousy at keeping secrets, and for that I appeal to everything from the US atomic programs to stealth technology. As the OP stated: If there is such a wide body of evidence and observation of UFOs, why is it that a single very rare occurrence of a meteor racing through the sky suddenly gets massive coverage?

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    8. Re:Pieces will be found by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      It's important to remember that UFO means "Unidentified Flying Object." That can be anything: A bird, a plane, or debris of various sorts.

      If you're still stuck on that, then you've been arguing with idiots and you are miles behind the educated. So, yes, thank-you. The adults have figured out what the acronym "UFO" means. Now perhaps you might want to ask why people are rolling their eyes at you and what they might know which you haven't worked out yet.

      Dolan is a nutjob entertainer? Sorry, but he doesn't write with the kind of adolescent vitriol your silly post is ringing with, so I'm inclined to take an academic of his caliber rather more seriously than you. Your canned examples function on the FOX News talking point level of intelligence, and utterly fail upon close examination. -Which, if you recall from your reading of Dolan's two books on the subject, were all in fact thoughtfully deconstructed with citations and disciplined logic which must have dazzled and amazed you to such a degree that you completely forgot about them when typing out your little post. Do you also demand, "If God exists then how can there be war?".

      Grow up and do some reading beyond your comfort zone, because frankly, it is very clear that you haven't the foggiest notion of what you are talking about.

      Bye now.

      -FL

    9. Re:Pieces will be found by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      Dolan is a nutjob entertainer? Sorry, but he doesn't write with the kind of adolescent vitriol your silly post is ringing with, so I'm inclined to take an academic of his caliber rather more seriously than you. Your canned examples function on the FOX News talking point level of intelligence, and utterly fail upon close examination. -Which, if you recall from your reading of Dolan's two books on the subject, were all in fact thoughtfully deconstructed with citations and disciplined logic which must have dazzled and amazed you to such a degree that you completely forgot about them when typing out your little post. Do you also demand, "If God exists then how can there be war?".

      Grow up and do some reading beyond your comfort zone, because frankly, it is very clear that you haven't the foggiest notion of what you are talking about.

      Judging by the inflammatory language of your post, I am compelled to believe that my post was hugely successful in achieving its goal. That you resorted to insults speaks volumes of your level of enlightenment!

      Since you didn't even bother with addressing the content of my post, it appears that I accomplished what I sought to do--and that was to illustrate that your arguments and appeals to a nutjob are moot. Thanks!

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  16. I was hoping for Nephilim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear their giant red-headed wives are hot, and can really throw a spitball.

    I hope Jesus Christ throws another one and hits target this time.

  17. Lost Child by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please Help. My wife and I live in that area. Last night we were out past our usual time and we found a young boy. He was wandering out in the cold all by himself.
    We've talked to the appropriate authorities, but we know we need to get the word out as much as possible. The doctors say he's fine, but he hasn't spoken a word yet.
    Please take a look at his picture and call your local authorities if you have any information at all. We are desperate to find out who he is.
    If nobody can legitimately claim him, we would be so blessed if we could adopt him. For now, Martha and I have taken to calling him Clark. Thanks.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Lost Child by 93,000 · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for the linked photo. I was expecting a movie screenshot, etc., but that was just awesome.

      Well done.

  18. Is there a Smallville anywhere nearby? by Oyjord · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a Californian, all the Midwest looks alike to me. Is there a Smallville anywhere near the meteor's GZ?

    1. Re:Is there a Smallville anywhere nearby? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but there's a Gotham and Metropolis. Gotham's due west of Madison Wisconsin.

  19. Spy Satellite. Duh! by rdmiller3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This doesn't make sense for a "meteor". The atmosphere is less than 200 miles thick, and the chance that a meteorite will skim across that relatively thin layer of atmosphere long enough to be sited along a 700-mile path over multiple states is infinitesimal. Multiply that by the tiny fractional probability that it would have enough mass to burn that long and the odds look impossible.

    More likely, this was a massive satellite in near earth orbit. That's really the only reasonable thing which would match the observations.

    So, since it's not being reported as a satellite it's probably a secret satellite. We already know that NASA launches classified payloads. It's safe to assume that other countries do too. Stealth technology would be simple, just build it with flat metal sides painted black and power it with a self-contained reactor (and there's your mass).

  20. Home on the Range by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0

    Oh give me a home
    Where the buffalo roam
    And the deer and the antelope play
    Where seldom is heard
    A discouraging word
    And the skies are not raining fireballs

  21. why was there no warning? by v1 · · Score: 1

    I thought there were at least a couple groups scanning the skies looking for the next armageddon-variety meteor headed our way? Wouldn't we expect to have seen a big thing like this coming? Granted, probably not enough to be a biosphere-killer, but still would make a mess of a city if it hit, or of possibly several if it hit water and did the tsunami thing.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:why was there no warning? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      The problem with asteroid hunting is that something big enough to do serious damage is not actually very big, in real terms. Think the size of a big house, not a small moon. There are millions of these things zipping around in various directions and for each one, you have to compute their orbits, our orbit, and decide if they coincide at any point. Although we know how to do all this, there's just huge amounts of it to do and it's difficult to convince anyoen to give you enough funding to make a worthwhile job of it.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:why was there no warning? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Because they, in combination, don't know what they are doing and don't have enough resources.

      Saying that they don't know what they are doing is a glib way of saying that the techniques they use are limited in their coverage. Problems they face include the huge number of bodies flying around the solar system and the rather limited visibility of tiny objects like house-sized asteroids.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  22. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    The orbit of this will be found very quickly - probably within 24 hours. That will rule in or out whether it was in Earth orbit.

    Note that

    - there are orbits for all satellites bigger than a few kilograms, secret or no. It's hard to hide up there and

    - there have been number of multi-state meteors in the past. This, if a meteor, would not be very unusual.

  23. Wait, what? by Rehnberg · · Score: 1

    Something remotely interesting happened in the Midwest? That might be a first... Too bad I was stuck studying for APs...

    1. Re:Wait, what? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Something remotely interesting happened in the Midwest? That might be a first

      I see you've never read my journals.

  24. more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by unity100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    that is the tune they are singing. ok, so it was a meteor that somehow, was able to lit up an entire horizon, but it didnt land anywhere, or caused any damage. and chanced up right over the city. ok. then what the fuck is this in seattle :

    http://s959.photobucket.com/albums/ae77/seattleslew2010/20100415_0715P/

    the video below was shot 30 minutes before 2008 Sichuan quake in china :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4&feature=player_embedded#!

    sky changing colors before quake in chile :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQsDNcm6714&feature=player_embedded

    the first images that have been captured today around seattle may be 'sun pillars' a phenomenon that appears right before a major seismic event.

    such various colorful displays are not rare before seismic events. therefore, govt. may be bullshitting you to sleep.

    1. Re:more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easy on that kool-aid, buddy.

    2. Re:more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are fucking stupid. Several close friends of mine as well as coworkers saw it first hand - I heard it first hand. It was not a pillar of light or whatever. It looked like lightning to some, missles to others. Not a pillar by any means. I will awknowledge I have been seeing darker pillars off in the horizon. As cool as it would be that some random abberation of my vision is some large project of humankind, I do not believe we are competant enough to do that.

    3. Re:more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      Not to overstate the obvious, but you might want to look here.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    4. Re:more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      the point you are missing here, if an object which acts on its own discretion and capable of accelerating to immense speeds almost instantly (an ufo) while 3 soviet mig 21s are chasing and filming it, can be labeled and 'debunked' as optical illusion, this fucking meteor also can.

    5. Re:more bullshit. 'sleep well america'. by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      the point you are missing here, if an object which acts on its own discretion and capable of accelerating to immense speeds almost instantly (an ufo) while 3 soviet mig 21s are chasing and filming it, can be labeled and 'debunked' as optical illusion, this fucking meteor also can.

      I think you may have forgotten that some of your links pointed to shaky camera footage of clouds and/or a column of smoke.

      Several of the related videos also showed shots of sun dogs and other optical phenomenon. It's unlikely HAARP and more likely natural.

      As far as purported objects being chased here and there, I'm skeptical.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  25. You would think nerds would know better... by guytoronto · · Score: 0, Troll

    A meteor is the trail of light generated when a meteoroid enters the atmosphere.

    A meteor can't enter the atmosphere, as it can't exist until it the meteoroid enters the atmosphere.

    A meteorite is a meteoroid that has impacts the ground.

  26. Re: by Lex.Luthor99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mod Parent Down

  27. Did NASA know about this? by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is this something NASA knows about?
    If not, why not?
    They should be able to give us a heads up about anything that enters our atmosphere from space so it can be tracked/viewed/enjoyed etc.
    I'm sure the science on the shuttles are valuable, but what about stuff that's flying at our planet, and I don't just mean the belt of pollution in earth's orbit consisting of dangerous (to the space station/satellites etc) space trash.
    Or is this stuff too fast/small/frequent/random to track?

    1. Re:Did NASA know about this? by devonbowen · · Score: 1

      Most of these things are too small to have been found by scientists. They've done a good job over the last few years finding most of the big ones (1 km diameter - stuff that'd wipe out the planet) but there are still plenty of smaller ones that they have no idea about. Most of them, in fact. I believe the only one that's ever been known in advance of its impact was in Sudan last year. And that was only known a day or so in advance.

      Devon

  28. That there was just one of Larry King's marriages by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    ... lighting up the sky ... Tunguska event, like . . . see tmz.com for details . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  29. All hail Maitreya! by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.share-international.org/background/miracles/mi_circles.htm
    Or at least maybe the space brothers?
    http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NewAge/Creme_Maitreya.htm

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
  30. Related news by PPH · · Score: 1

    They just interrupted the Mercury Theater radio program with further news about the sighting.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. Wrong bad guy? by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    Blame Kane and build more harvesters.

  32. I saw it by Myopic · · Score: 1

    I live in Madison. My wife and I saw flashes of light out the window and figured it was distant lightning. Seeing the video now is cool. I definitely saw those bold flashes of light. I wish I'd known what it was, I would have gone for a better look.

  33. ROFL by garompeta · · Score: 1

    "It was somewhat alarming to me," Thompson said. "I've seen shooting stars, but I've never seen something jetting across the sky with flames shooting off it."

    1. Re:ROFL by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

      By far the funniest quote in this story.

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
  34. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    The atmosphere is less than 200 miles thick, and the chance that a meteorite will skim across that relatively thin layer of atmosphere long enough to be sited along a 700-mile path over multiple states is infinitesimal.

    One might say that the odds were...astronomical.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  35. I saw this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really drunk when I saw this last night. I thought it was someone on campus shooting off a firework, but everyone else thought it was a meteor. I did not believe anyone until I saw it here.

  36. Irrelevant by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 0, Troll

    Man, this news article is completely irrelevant to my interests. Why doesn't slashdot cover something more interesting, like the Sburb beta release? It should have been sent out a couple of days ago, and there has to be somebody who's got it working by this point.

  37. API video on Youtube by Fish+(David+Trout) · · Score: 1

    "Raw Video: Dash Cam Catches Meteor's Fall"
    (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m4ZIO8t0dI)

    --
    "Fish" (David B. Trout)
  38. Xenu! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Hmm, sighted over California? It must be the second coming of Xenu.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  39. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    This doesn't make sense for a "meteor". The atmosphere is less than 200 miles thick, and the chance that a meteorite will skim across that relatively thin layer of atmosphere long enough to be sited along a 700-mile path over multiple states is infinitesimal....

    Um, no, it's not.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  40. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am intrigued by your secret satellite theory. Please reply with a physical address where you can be located so we can discuss this further. Feel free to bring along any like-minded individuals you may know to the aforementioned discreet and preferably unpopulated location.

    In the meantime, perhaps you could recall your original post; wouldn't want any secret government types to see it and hunt you down like a wolf on a whitetailfuckingdeeryousonofbitchwhenIseeyou....er see you soon fellow believer.

    Best Regards,

    John Q. Smith

  41. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    The path doesn't have to be 700 miles long to be visible over 700 miles of ground. An apparently stationary object 200 miles up will only be overhead of a single point on the ground, but will be 45 degrees or higher above the horizon for about 700 miles in every direction. This thing could've exploded in place and been visible over as long a track.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  42. I'm thinking by warGod3 · · Score: 1

    That it was more likely some guys, who after a night of beer and brats, was sitting around trying to light farts...

    --
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
  43. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shhhhh. Just wear your wig and smile a lot.

  44. secret alien operation over europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they let the volcano on iceland erupt a massive ashes cloud over euorope to stop any human air traffic. then they entered the atmosphere to perform some "stuff" above europe.

    alien invasion inc.

  45. It's a cover-up by TranceThrust · · Score: 1

    They shot down a nuclear cruise missle. I saw it live on my tv yesterday on this show called '24'.

  46. yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

    im not stupid, but extensive skepticism is. ill show you :

    prove me it was a meteor. it might have been a rare atmospheric phenomenon or swamp gas.

  47. Debris from last week's asteroid? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it could be a piece of debris from the asteroid that made a close pass to Earth about a week ago, in a spiral orbit since then. Just because it made a big light show doesn't mean the material was huge. The piece of debris could have started out the size of a softball, and (if it made it to the ground at all) could have been smaller than the size of a pea upon impact.

    1. Re:Debris from last week's asteroid? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      I don't know that something the size of a softball would make those long sonic booms that were heard over such a large area.

      Someone quoted a guy from Adler Planetarium estimating that is was 1000 lbs or so based on various factors.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  48. Not a meteor by Sosetta · · Score: 0

    This wasn't a meteor. It must have been a satellite. Meteors/meteorites move VERY fast and explode quickly. There are no extra-terrestrial objects that would match the velocity of the earth to within a few hundred mph (and not get accelerated to beyond that by gravity). That thing had to have been man-made.

  49. Even cooler from the air! by CaptCrunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was on my way back to Chicago Midway on a Southwest flight when I saw this outside my window seat. We were traveling east and it was several miles to our north, but impressive nonetheless. From my perspective, it was looked a lot like pictures you always see of comets. For the few seconds I was able to see it, it was burning white hot and got more intense just before it broke up into 3 pieces and quickly disappeared from site.

    I'm not sure what it was, but it made for a fantastic show!

    --
    âoeItâ(TM)s a funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it."
  50. Don't sell that meteor by pavon · · Score: 1

    That belongs in a museum!

  51. Apollo is at it again by mordred99 · · Score: 1

    It was our god Apollo and his sister Artemis fighting again. He decided to streak across the night sky naked in his sun chariot, now Artemis will have to show the moon during the daylight time. These crazy kids do this all the time. I think Zeus will get pissed at this and we will get thunderstorms later today. (Look up Indiana weather for today - Thunderstorms !!).

  52. Re:Spy Satellite. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's really the only reasonable thing which would match the observations."

    The only thing the public knows about...

  53. A star fell from the sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the star was a diamond, and the diamond was a white point star.

    And now some insane Time Lords are gonna mess up the earth. I knew I was going to have a bad friday.

  54. Just a weather balloon by rickburque · · Score: 1

    Clearly a weather balloon.

    Might want check Wright-Patterson for a new shipment of "little people" though.

    Pay no attention to than man behind the curtain.

    --
    angst_ridden
  55. Kryptonyte! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    A couple of decades ago while travelling I saw a spectaculat shooting star. It was bright green and flashing erratically, and looked like it was going up instead of down.

    The next day the news reported that the Russians had jettisoned part of the MIR space station, which was apparently what the shooting star was. Must have been a lot of copper in it for it to be bright green like that.

  56. ok then by unity100 · · Score: 1

    more links. these sightings are pacing up. this is exactly why, u.s., previously very secretive and heavy handed in these matters, is easing up the blockade of information on these subjects. cnn has covered a panel that was comprised of former high level govt officials talking about ufo interactions for the first time, and noted that 'this is no panel of kooks - serious business'. and hawking came out, leave aside denying ufo interaction possibility, tried to scare people off contact. expect to see much more on these, since ufos are also becoming more liberal with exposing themselves :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvFTpAIwAWs

    above is long beach, ca police FLIR (forward looking infrared) recording a ufo which was being chased by a police chopper at the time. later police dept reported that the object seemed under intelligent control and chase lasted a few minutes. this is a recent case.

    http://blip.tv/file/3522986

    above is a much more liberal occurrence. a shot in length, made in geelong australia recently.

    if you want more, keep following http://www.ufo-blogger.com/ . Its the most solid source on footages. They send all footate to numerous experts around the world to check for validity. you will find which of the videos were deemed real, which were deemed fake in the postings of the videos themselves.