Slashdot Mirror


Penny Arcade Makes Time 100

Precision noticed that Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins of Penny Arcade fame have made the Time 100. The writeup talks about Child's Play and PAX and lavishes deserved adoration upon the pair. I've always envied their ability to maintain control over their brand and use it for appropriately portioned good and evil ;)

61 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Good for them by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a big fan of the brand and PAX, but I really have a hard time finding anything enjoyable about their writing.

    Perhaps 1 out of 10 comics are interesting and most often the writing drones on like I'm reading Moby Dick

    "I scrolled up and down my Steam library yesterday, listlessly, without so much as a remembered thrill; all I wanted to do was play Blur for some reason, something I hadn't picked up in weeks but whose thirsting fronds were reaching up through some mental fissure. After a few rounds to loosen up, quite organically I found myself in a Party discussing the events of the day. The conviviality and natural flow of the conversation began to disintegrate as the race progressed, slowing and then ceasing altogether, like the dwindling reports from a bag of microwave popcorn."

    1. Re:Good for them by iknowcss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Tycho's" literary voice is one of my favorites. It flows well and sounds more like ironic Moby Dick than Moby Dick.

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    2. Re:Good for them by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The comics are often low-brow humor. The posts are often very high-brow diatribes. I love both and the contrast they portray. But to each their own.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Good for them by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      NOTE: your post got cut off before you showed us how it should be done. Please repost, kthnx.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Good for them by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both men are trying to improve their art. Gabe has come a long way from his humble beginnings. Tycho's writing outside the comics is still an acquired taste. I think it is partly an affectation, he's the smart one, Gabe is the dumb one, but those are still personae they put on for the comic.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Good for them by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IM sorry you cant appreciate PA writing. It is very wordy and convoluted sometimes, but thats part of the appeal. He doesnt dumb it down for the masses. Most of the time when im reading i can speed skim through articles, but when i read PA i stop and really process what is being said.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    7. Re:Good for them by wetdogjp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. I remember actually crying when I read the story he wrote for his newborn son.

      Every time a read a thoughtful, poetic post from him, I think, "That's how I want to write."

    8. Re:Good for them by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "slowing and then ceasing altogether, like the dwindling reports from a bag of microwave popcorn."

      Any idiot can write a meandering tangle of pretentious and meaningless wank about a game that I will never care about, but only Jerry Holkins can finish it a simile so clever that I will be actually glad I read that drivel. That's why he's the one with a web comic and we're all posting on slashdot.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    9. Re:Good for them by GameMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, but which Moby dick are you referring to? The original, or this one

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/1/15/

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  2. As they should! by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are arguably among the most influential people in an industry bigger than Hollywood...I'd say they deserve a place on the list.

    Not bad for two nerdy dweebs who probably got swirlied in middle school.

    1. Re:As they should! by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Didn't Halo 3's launch weekend generate more revenue than the biggest Hollywood opening weekend of all time?

      Video Games are just as influential and big as the movie indudstry.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:As they should! by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that's a false comparison. Theatres are limited it the number of people that can fit in at any time, however games can manufacture the cd's ahead of time so they don't have an upper limit in the same amount of time.

    3. Re:As they should! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Halo 3 did make more than most hollywood movies in its first day than they do in their first weekend. Over the course of a few months though I believe most movies catch up.

      While I would agree that video games are a big industry, I wouldn't go as far as to say they are as influential as movies. Video games (especially new releases) usually cost about 5 or 6 times as much as a movie ticket. If you consider the amount of sales and not the dollars earned as influential (which I have come to take its meaning), than movies still win out.

    4. Re:As they should! by spun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well it may be a false comparison, but the video game industry is now larger than the film industry in terms of revenue. The film industry made around 10.5 billion in revenues in 2008, while the video game industry made around 11.5 billion. This is counting movie and game sales and rentals. The film industry may hold more cultural cachet and influence, and more people consider films to be true art, but that is changing as well.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:As they should! by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A video game costs $60. Avatar tickets cost me $15 a pop. Even assuming a standar movie ticket is only $10, a video game is more expensive. So for the same money, more people are seeing movies. I'll give you that. But if I buy one copy of Mario Party and invite my friends over to play, then multiple people are playing on the one purchase.

      But you often watch a 2 hour movie onec, and you're done. Video games you spend more time with. Video games are often played multi-player, or online. You aren't supposed to talk during movies, so one could argue that video games are a more social experience.

      For the dollars, I'd contend that video games consume more of our time and conscience. Furthermore, I think they have subsumed a larger piece of the cultural zeitgeist. My daughter is 4 and doesn't own a video game console yet, but she knows who Mario is.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:As they should! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the video game industry is not bigger than the film industry.

      Film Industry in the US employs 361,000

      http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs038.htm

      All software publishing in the US employs 263,700

      http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs051.htm

      Globally video games are worth 40 billion

      http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/VideoGameSalesOvertakingMusic.aspx

      US film revenue is 42 billion, total box office gross is 10-11 billion, but that's only a piece of the US film industry.

      http://www.allbusiness.com/media-telecommunications/movies-sound-recording/10512814-1.html

    7. Re:As they should! by Gamer_2k4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say they deserve a place on the list.

      Perhaps...but any entry on a list that puts Lady Gaga as the top artist of the year should be taken with a grain of salt.

  3. Well congratulations by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, congratulations. It's nice when good work gets recognized.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  4. Popularity contest by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kudos to them, but sadly this was a popularity contest where the likes of Justin Bieber and such were receiving votes.

    I'd rather a wide-range, rational panel try to offer their opinions rather than open up a massive internet vote.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Popularity contest by bertoelcon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget this is a contest moot from 4chan has won before. It makes the whole contest seem moot. (Partly intended pun there)

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    2. Re:Popularity contest by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone know if they fixed the massive flaws from last year that allowed 4chan to precisely control the top 21 entries to spell "marblecake also the game"?

  5. Really, Time? by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was impressed until I read the rest of the list, particularly this love letter to Glenn Beck........ written by none other than Sarah Palin herself.

    Really, Time? Sure, he's pretty influential, and a demagogue to be certain. But casting him as an intellectual and a history buff? Have they ever even watched his program?

    Jon Stewart had a great point last week: The Daily Show is as absurd and farcical as it's been since Day 1. However, the "real news" media are slowly inching their way toward the realm of absurdist comedy and entertainment.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Really, Time? by vxice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stewart pointed out that his networks slogan isn't "fair and balanced."

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    2. Re:Really, Time? by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      But casting him as an intellectual and a history buff? Have they ever even watched his program?

      He could very well be an intellectual and history buff, who happens to become an emotional demagogue once he's in front of the camera.

      In that case, he's a pathological liar.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  6. I saw that in their post yesterday by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When they commented that they have a bigger voice than Roger because the last time they checked they where above Oprah on the Time top 100 list.

    I was like "NO WAY!" so I went, did some fact checking, and then voted to put them up to #1!!

    Click the link here http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1972075_1976159,00.html
    To vote for them!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  7. PA is a great organization by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All they need is a decent web comic. Seriously the quality has dropped considerably in the last couple of years as it seems the comic is just an afterthought, they occaisionally put their heart into it and make a brilliant comic but for the mostpart I don't even chuckle anymore.

  8. Re:Childs Play by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can only write off what you actually donate. So unless they're donating enough to make their net income zero, they're paying taxes on their advertising income.

    The vast majority of money for Child's Play comes from donations, donations that go completely into the charity, and are completely unnecessary for your It's Just A Tax Shelter theory.

    They've raised literally millions of dollars for sick kids to have games to play in the hospital.

    You're full of shit and an asshole to boot for trying to tear down something as great as Child's Play.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  9. Re:Childs Play by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like to read PA from time to time. I could do without the sophomoric language that seems to be thrown in simply to 'identify with the youth', but sometimes I really find the comic funny. But the Child Play charity is primarily just a tax shelter for PA. They make a lot on money on advertising and PAX, and use CP to avoid (or at least defer) paying taxes on it. Not that that's anything unusual for a corporation, but I hate when companies portray their 'charitable giving' as some grand altruistic philanthropy, when it's just a way for them to dodge taxes.

    If the laws that allowed this type of behavior went away, so would the giving.

    You do not understand tax laws as well as you think you do if you believe the primary motivation for charitable contributions is to dodge taxes. It's a secondary motivation. You don't come out ahead.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  10. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're suggesting that people only pretend to like things that are popular. How did they get popular to begin with?

    And why doesn't everyone here pretend to like Twilight? It's genre fiction and insanely popular. Maybe the Slashdot crowd likes XKCD because it is great, and they hate Twilight because it is crap.

    Just maybe.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  11. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow. It's hard to find the words. Yeah, there are reasons to be cynical about corporate charities, like how tobacco company Philip Morris spent tons more on advertising about how charitable it was than on actual charity...

    But dude, you can't let that cynicism blind you to real charity. I don't think you have any idea how hard volunteers for Child's Play work every year. In the first year before they had any real logistics in place, a whole team of local volunteers worked night and day to physically process, store, load, move, and unload tons of toys for Seattle Children's Hospital. Even though now the toys go to hospitals directly, volunteers still help with the charity dinner, with various fund raising events around the country, with community efforts at PAX like the Cookie Brigade, etc.

    Unless you have more evidence than a mere assumption, it is callous and insulting to all those volunteers to paint their hard work as nothing more than a 'tax dodge'. While I don't work for PA Inc, I know a lot of people who do, and I have heard nothing, not even a rumor, of any funds from PA revenues being somehow 'laundered' through CPC.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  12. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by TheSambassador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right! Your "I don't think anybody finds it funny" argument is flawless. Now I realize that I only found their comics funny because I thought that, somewhere, SOMEBODY else thought they were funny. Eager to fit in, I quickly forced and tricked myself into enjoying it. THANK YOU for showing me the light.

    I mean, why would I ever find awkward phrases like "Do you have snakes that come in sometimes? Don't stand for that shit!" hilarious?

    All webcomics, hell all COMEDY is hit and miss. I cannot say that because one thing a person does is funny, everything else that that person does must necessarily be funny or else the first thing becomes unfunny. I find Penny-Arcade to be more often funny than not... so I like it. You might disagree.

  13. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by TheNumberless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So let me start: Penny Arcade is not funny. xkcd is not funny. Don't bother referencing them, we won't find them funny!

    Since we're doing the whole opinions-as-facts thing: xkcd and Penny Arcade are funny because I find them funny.

    It's neat that a lot of people seem to agree, but my opinion of their humor doesn't require it.

  14. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find about 70% of the xkcd I run into funny.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  15. Jealous much? by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here are we have popular geeks who make a living making little pictures and writing little stories for. Everyone loves them. They are witty and funny and frequently have sex with actual women and are everything you are not. Do you know there's a guy who has a whole boring ass blog about how xkcd isn't funny? Nobody reads it, because we all think xkcd IS funny. Penny arcade IS funny. You and the other haters are either too stupid to find the humor, or too jealous to admit it. Once you have achieved something in your life, I doubt you will feel the need to put other achievers down. Maybe you should try, you know, doing something, rather than bitching about the people who do.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  16. Re:Childs Play by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the laws that allowed this type of behavior went away, so would the giving.

    Yeah! It sucks that people get rewarded for helping people. If there were any justice in this world, we would severely punish charities. Only then could we be sure that the people were truly selfless.

  17. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OH NOES! TEH SWEARS!

    I have never, and will never, understand this mindset. They're just words. Words are giving power and meaning only by the reader. To me, they're not a big deal, if anything they indicate that the authors are being honest and not filtering themselves just to fit in some moralist 'acceptable' box.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  18. Re:Childs Play by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow. It's hard to find the words. Yeah, there are reasons to be cynical about corporate charities, like how tobacco company Philip Morris spent tons more on advertising about how charitable it was than on actual charity...

    Right, or a great example today I heard on the radio. KFC is trying to raise $8.5 million to donate to cancer research. They're doing this by selling pink buckets of chicken at something like $8/pop, and donating $0.50 of each. This is the typical cynical corporate method of charity contributions: Making their donation dependent on product sales, advertising this fact, and thus trying to directly leverage their "generosity" into increased product sales. I wouldn't be surprised if they expected the extra sales to completely offset the donation itself.

    If, instead, KFC just donated $8.5mil directly, even wrote that off their taxes, and didn't spend millions advertising their generosity, that would be fine. Getting some PR benefit out of charity is okay with me.

    But dude, you can't let that cynicism blind you to real charity. I don't think you have any idea how hard volunteers for Child's Play work every year.

    Yeah, he obviously has no idea what Child's Play is all about. There are a million easier ways to get the same tax benefit.

    I have heard nothing, not even a rumor, of any funds from PA revenues being somehow 'laundered' through CPC.

    Well I don't know about that, but I have heard rumors of foul play at the CP auction. ;)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  19. Re:Childs Play by theantipop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The money comes into PA from ads and whatnot, they direct most (if not all) of it Childs Play (therefore writing it all off as a 'donation' to themselves), and set themselves up as administrators (therefore avoiding paying payroll taxes).

    Where's your source for this? Everything I've heard about the way Child's Play is set up is that they distance it from PA Inc. as much as possible for two reasons. The first being that they don't want the image of the comic to draw ire towards the charity. Secondly, they don't want the possible collapse of their company to take down the charity.

  20. The *very* broken clock. by Tei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems is easy to be a guru on the internet. You can make lots of weird predictions, and some will be right.

    Like this 2006 comic:
    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/05/01/
    And this today news:
    http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/54532/Activision-Bungie-Sign-Ten-Year-Publishing-Partnership

    And this part of the reason Penny Arcade is still relevant.. theres a lot of predictions, and some are right.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  21. Re:Childs Play by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh great. So now you've gone from accusing them of using CP to dodge taxes on their advertising revenue to accusing them of laundering charitable donations into their own pockets.

    Do you have any evidence for any of this? Do you have any proof that the two of them are paying themselves wages as CP's "administrators"? Do you have any proof that they have extracted "expenses" from the pool of donations that were not actually expenses of the Child's Play charity, but rather expenses of Penny Arcade or simply profit-taking?

    Because that all would have to be spelled out on their tax returns, and if those "expenses" weren't really expenses then they can't be claimed and the IRS would be on them like flies on shit. So you're not just accusing them of cynically taking advantage of the tax code, you're actually accusing them of being tax cheats. The law is very specific on what can actually be counted as charity and what can't.

    You're a real piece of work, you know that? People are out there making a real difference in children's lives, and all you have is baseless accusations founded on cynicism. Cynicism for its own sake is wrong and stupid. And it also doesn't help anyone, unlike Child's Play.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  22. Re:Childs Play by dank+zappingly · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I have noted from your other armchair legal opinions, you do not understand the law. You do not know anything about Penny Arcade's corporate structure or how they pay their bills or Child's Play's bills. You are accusing a charitable organization of fraud without any basis in reality. Here is a quick sample from the FAQ on their website: Q. Does Child's Play charge administrative fees? A. We try our best to have every dollar that comes in go right back to the hospitals, but there is a slight administrative cost that does get paid for with donations (for example, shipping $200,000 worth of Nintendo DS' to dozens of hospitals worldwide is not free, sadly). Historically, these charges have not exceeded 2-3%. It's true that we're a non-profit, but unlike most non-profits, we're not in it to create a self-sustainable entity. We do it to give. Again, I ask you to please stop polluting the internet with misinformation. These people are doing good work to make the lives of sick children better. By defaming them you are taking trolling to a whole new level.

  23. Re:You want funny? Go to Zero Punctuation! by li99sh79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a remarkable sameness to Yahtzee's work that, quite frankly, grows tiresome after a while.

    --
    I was just here, where did I go?
  24. Re:Childs Play by krmt · · Score: 4, Informative

    You've apparently missed all the heartfelt and often tearful thank-yous they get from parents with their kids in the hospital. I was in the room only a few yards away from the woman who broke down crying during PAX East thanking them for doing Child's Play because such things meant so much to her. It's on the episode of their reality show for PAX East that came out recently if you want to see it for yourself. Child's Play does make a real difference in people's lives and that shouldn't be discounted.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  25. Re:Childs Play by Gailin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You couldn't be more wrong. As an adult who recently went through 5 rounds of chemo and a bone marrow transplant. The 5 months overall I spent in the hospital over the last year were a lot better because I had an electronic outlet. For me this was my laptop and smartphone, for a child, it may be video game console. Don't underestimate how important it is to get your mind off the shiatty situation you are in.

    There are lots of people and resources to give food, clothing, shelter and money. Of course, there can always be more. But don't denigrate a group simply because they found a unique and beneficial way of helping. Believe me its worth it and is appreciated.

    --
    I wish there was a fscking blue pill
  26. Re:Childs Play by sartin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they wanted to help they would give food, clothing, shelter, or just money. Giving a shiny Nintendo DS to a kid with a three pound tumor in his abdomen, while his parents are slowing bankrupted by medical bills, does nothing...other than sooth the conscience of the giver.

    This is quite simply not true. My oldest son was on treatment for leukemia for 3 years and 2 months, so I have spent quite a lot of time in the children's oncology clinic. The clinic we went to does not receive games from Child Play, but from other sources. The kids in the clinic love the games and they make it a lot easier to be stuck in a chair doing a six hour infusion. Yes, it's true, some of these kids need clothing or shelter, and a distressing number of the parents face bankruptcy. That doesn't make the games a conscience-soothing gift. They actually deliver a lot of value for the majority of kids stuck at the clinic.

  27. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh you mean PrincessRedDot (PRD) and maybe one or two others that in fact only make a living wage? I think you radically overestimate the financial scope of CPC's diabolical, faceless administration. You don't know anything other than your wild, baseless assumptions about CPC and its people. Whereas I have met and talked with PRD several times over many years. I have myself volunteered my time and with the help of my wife raised thousands for CPC through community events.

    You want every charity to be run like a monastery that's your prerogative, but to act like CPC is some cabal of evil tax-dodging millionaire fat cats feeding off of an army of deluded rubes is so intellectually dishonest as to be disgusting and absurd. That is why your original post is rightly modded into oblivion.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  28. Re:Can you stop calling it a brand? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm a rabid PA fan and apologist, but even I can admit it's a brand. They run a company to make money. They have a trademark identity as a primary means of accomplishing that goal. That is a brand. The end.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  29. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find about 70% of the xkcd I run into funny.

    XKCD can be funny a lot of times, but I also find it frequently unbearably smug. Not old school nerd, more like the newer trendy hipster nerd thing that cropped up in the past few years.

  30. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, I've lost it. As parent of a child who has benefited from Seattle Children's Hospital's care more than once, let me say you must truly be the most bitter, irredeemable, self-righteous, scum-sucking, ignorant, foolish, truculent, and repugnant bastards I have ever had the misfortune of wasting my time reading. If you can't understand the value of bringing a small amount of fun engagement into the lives of children who may very well die slowly in the most agonizing pain imaginable, then you yourself are worthless, inhumane excuse of a being.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  31. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His user page says he has kids, but as a parent I can't believe it. Nobody with kids could be so dense and so callous as to fail to understand, let alone denigrate, the value of any enjoyable distraction to a child in pain. If it's true, I really pity his kids. He's one sick puppy.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  32. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by soppsa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yea I agree with this, and it wasn't always the case. XKCD used to be mostly hit for me, but the last couple years the smugness has been overwhelming.

  33. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by IICV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, why would I ever find awkward phrases like "Do you have snakes that come in sometimes? Don't stand for that shit!" hilarious?

    .... because you've read Skymall, and that is actually what the writing in the magazine is like? The whole thing is one giant ball of awkward, badly-written text that you read only because there's absolutely nothing else to do, and sometimes the products are unintentionally hilarious (like the hearing aid that looks like a Bluetooth headset).

  34. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jerry and Mike receive no payments from CPC, that's just wild, speculative bullshit on Itninja's part. Kristen Lindsay (AKA PrincessRedDot or PRD) does, I believe, and maybe one or two others, but those are living wages, not wild profits.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  35. Re:Childs Play by sartin · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can also write off the income of anyone designated at 'administrators' of the charitable organization.

    Before today I was completely unaware of Child's Play, so I visited Guidestar to have a look at actual numbers. This information is from their 2007 form 990 (the latest I found at Guidestar and the one that probably looks worst for expenses). It fully discloses Penny Arcade's affiliation (gee, the IRS cares about people trying to wash salaries and actually checks this sort of thing).

    • Three Penny Arcade shareholders are "Directors, Officers, Trustees, or Key Employees" - none receive any compensation from Child's Play and the three combined received $515,725.25 in compensation from Penny Arcade. Looks like they're missing a huge opportunity to wash salaries in the way described.
    • They paid a $37,000 for a project manager to administer $384,059 of cash and non-cash (e.g. games) grants. They allocate the project manger half to program (giving stuff away) and half to fundraising. I am a little confused by the PM, since they list no employees or independent contractors in their highest paid list.
    • They spent $41,669 on fundraising expenses, most of it in three areas: $6000 for professional fundraising, $18,500 for the PM, and $12,024 for travel.
    • They held a fundraising auction that lost $23,441.

    I have questions as a result of that (very quick and limited) review, but none in the area of trying to wash salaries. I'm curious about where the Project Manager expense actually goes. I'm curious about the disaster of an auction - why they did it, what they learned, whether they plan to try again. I fail to see evidence of the sort of fraud you are claiming.

    Corporations get into charity for multiple reasons: good public relations, donating to related interests, belief in the cause. That doesn't make promoting or giving to a charity a fundamentally bad thing. Unless you have evidence to back up your claims, the evidence I've seen suggests they are unfounded.

  36. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by Late+Adopter · · Score: 3, Informative

    XKCD can be funny a lot of times, but I also find it frequently unbearably smug.

    So do I, and so do the authors of http://xkcdexplained.com/

  37. Re:Hypocrisy much? by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm bitching about talentless losers who demean others out of jealousy rather than any real critique. That's hardly hypocritical.

    It is if you're doing it because you're jealous of them. (^_^)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  38. Re:Childs Play by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you for the informative background. I can illuminate the project manager a bit, she's Kristin Lindsay AKA Princess Reddot or PRD. I think there are some interviews out there on the intarwebs if you're interested. I think the 2007 auction was a flop because that was right about when the economy started to crash so people didn't really put as much into it that year. I doubt that previous or following years had similar failings.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  39. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by hldn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why doesn't everyone here pretend to like Twilight? It's genre fiction and insanely popular. Maybe the Slashdot crowd likes XKCD because it is great, and they hate Twilight because it is crap.

    maybe twihards like twilight because it's great and they hate xkcd because it's crap?

    or perhaps it's just because different people enjoy different things? nah, couldn't be that.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  40. Re:Childs Play by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're so full of shit.

    One of my fondest possessions is a thank-you card with crayon drawings on it I received from Tulane's Children's Hospital in New Orleans for some video games I sent them through CP a couple years back. The donations get to the kids, and it really does make their lives better.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  41. Re:The it's-not-funny-but-we-laugh-anyway loop. by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe I'm a freak, but I have actually read an excerpt from one of the Twilight novels (I have a Kindle and downloading samples is very easy). It really is as terrible as the uninformed haters make it out to be, possibly worse. I also enjoy many things of dubious quality, my reading, gaming, television and movie preferences would make a critic in the field squeal. Its all about being honest with yourself, and giving things a fair shake. And, I'm sorry, but Twilight is awful.

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"