Slashdot Mirror


Call of Duty: Black Ops Announced

UgLyPuNk writes "In amongst all the lawsuits and signings, Activision and Treyarch have found the time to announce the latest in one of the world's best-selling video game franchises: Call of Duty: Black Ops is due to hit shelves November 9." The official site has a trailer, which has been dissected for details by the folks at GameTrailers.

110 comments

  1. Dissected for details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In one of the missions, you have to dissect someone for details.

  2. Date of Birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't access the site as it demanded personal information.

    Direct link to the trailer on the Youtube

    1. Re:Date of Birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're dumb enough to get upset instead of just giving it bogus information? You'd be amazed how many visitors they get who were born on 1 Jan 1901.

    2. Re:Date of Birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're dumb enough to get upset instead of just giving it bogus information? You'd be amazed how many visitors they get who were born on 1 Jan 1901.

      but i herd they know who u r and how old u r from your ip adress

    3. Re:Date of Birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use 1/1/1970. If it's good enough for Unix it's good enough for one of my fake online personalities.

    4. Re:Date of Birth by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work without cookies.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. I wish theyd get back to historical shooters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rather than try to emulate counterstrike/rainbow six -AGAIN-

    1. Re:I wish theyd get back to historical shooters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, it's vietnam era... and you'd be a bit hard pressed to claim that any of the COD games have much in common with counterstrike or rainbow six.

  4. Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This game will:

    * have at least half of the playable characters dead by the end of the plot

    * have a "shocking" sequence for that extra controversial touch

    * not have any dedicated servers

    * have a multiplayer section with unbearable lag and bugs exploited within the first hours after the release

    * still be most successful game of the year

    1. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like Avatar as a game... :-)

    2. Re:Predictions by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      You left out the shooter-on-rails sections and the meaningless collection of objects to unlock achievements.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    3. Re:Predictions by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      You didn't mention any DRM ... won't someone think of the DRM?

    4. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the Treyarch CoDs, so it'll be a lame reflection of the previous CoD in the series. Just wait for Black Ops 2, which will be better because it'll be made by... oh, uh...

    5. Re:Predictions by logjon · · Score: 1

      actually, my first thought was inb4 crippling drm

      --
      The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
      Only fools would take it as fact.
    6. Re:Predictions by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like Avatar as a game... :-)

      Actually, Avatar as a game did rather poorly, despite the involvement of James Cameron.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Predictions by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the shooter-on-rails sections

      This is my biggest complaints about the direction that COD has taken.

      I'd much rather see a game with the same great mechanics but more open, like Far Cry or Far Cry 2. Let me make decisions about where to go and what to do.

      That "on the rails" experience made the "controversial" scene in Modern Warfare even more morally twisted. Civilians were sent at you like aliens in Space Invader and all you could do was keep walking and keep shooting. I found that more objectionable than the content itself.

      The best games give you decisions to make, not just buttons to push.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's trying to tell you that Avatar the movie suck ass.

    9. Re:Predictions by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually you didn't have to shoot in that scene, I know because in the German version it gives you an instant game over if you kill any civilian.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDR is correct. I went through the entire scene and never fired once. You can skip the scene but if you don't you still do not have to shoot anyone.

    11. Re:Predictions by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      The last FPS tactical shoot I actually enjoyed is a tie between Rainbow 6: Rouge Spear and Ghost Recon 1. After Ubi bought Red Storm, the games seemed more and more like arcade shoot 'em ups rather than the experience of planning an attack before going into a mission.

      I stopped buying video games because no one made games I wanted to play anymore. Last game I bought was Falcon 4: Allied Force.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    12. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why deviate from a winning formula?

    13. Re:Predictions by cheatch · · Score: 0

      +1

      Most sad part about this is most of it will true with a DRM to boot. My money is on they will unplug their MW2 servers or make them so crappy that everyone will have to get this game. God bless not having dedicated servers.

    14. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try the Operation Flashpoint (Arma) series, or Combat Mission: Shock Force.

    15. Re:Predictions by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You forgot

      * Will have the first-ever 100% proven to never be crackable ever DRM.

      which means that the following will not happen

      * still be most successful game of the year

      since...

      * the game will have been proven to have ever existed at all. ;) (guaranteeing the first point)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    16. Re:Predictions by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh ha ha that's funny because you described Modern Warfare 2 and acted like it was a prediction of what this one is going to be like.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    17. Re:Predictions by mirshafie · · Score: 1

      The point of every segment of the story mode in COD MW2 is to teach you how to play multiplayer well. Its a tutorial from beginning to end. Think about it.

      In the "controversial" segment featuring russian terrorists and an endless supply of victims, you are taught the basics of moving, aiming and shooting. You have no way of losing, unlimited ammo, you move slowly etc. After that you are taught to pull the trigger at exactly the right moment, then you are taught to follow dots on a screen, then to be discriminate about what you shoot, and so on. Everything from conserving ammo to special attacks.

      Now, I understand that this is not what many people expected, and that's a fair reason to be disappointed. But all in all, I think the story mode was extremely well made. And to strengthen my point, many COD multiplayer nerds have been complaining about getting their asses kicked sore on MW2 multiplayer.

  5. Bleh. by Knifa · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Am I the only one that's completely tired of these war games? I think we've shot enough nazis/russians/muslims.

    1. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can never shoot enough Nazis, Russians, and/or muslims.

    2. Re:Bleh. by Svippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I the only one that's completely tired of these war games? I think we've shot enough nazis/russians/muslims.

      Yeah, when can we get to play the Nazis and shoot some Russians and Americans? That might even make these game exciting!

      Wait, I'm shooting at the Nazis? That's not how I remember it.

      --
      Clicked pie.
    3. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, you can in most WWII games.

    4. Re:Bleh. by Svippy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, not in single player, you cannot. Only Silent Hunter 3 has a decent single player campaign from the Germans' side. I don't really care about multiplayer when it comes down to it.

      --
      Clicked pie.
    5. Re:Bleh. by mythrilfan · · Score: 1

      Men of War has a rather good German campaign as well.

    6. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when can we get to play the Nazis and shoot some Russians and Americans? That might even make these game exciting!

      MW2 did that with the terrorist segment in the airport. Look at the backlash they got for that. Americans only like war games where America wins.

    7. Re:Bleh. by matunos · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean like in RTCW and Enemy Territory? Schnell! Schnell!

    8. Re:Bleh. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's multiplayer, though. Not a storyline with Good Democracy-Bringing Americans vs Bad Countries Fully Inhabited By Terrorists.

      That said, what I'm really looking forward to isn't a game where you play, say, some Arab guy defending his homeland against the American invasion. Nah, let the player be an American soldier, just stop fucking portraying it as a race towards liberated flower-bearing locals!

      I don't think Bethesda has the guts to make it, but a war FPS based on the U.S. invasion and annexation of Canada in Fallout universe could be interesting.

    9. Re:Bleh. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      You know...I've been thinking about doing a remake of Jagged Alliance 2 for a while now, with a different storyline and a style of warfare geared more towards guerilla and less to conquering and holding territory.

      A small banana republic defending itself against an american oppressor...might make for a nice change of pace.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    10. Re:Bleh. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Call of Duty there was the German Front Mod: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4btDsRGTrFc&feature=related

  6. Treyarch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why must every great Call of Duty be followed by a relatively mediocre one?

    1. Re:Treyarch? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Because they alternate studios for the COD series. It's the FPS equivalent of the Star Trek odd/even rule.

    2. Re:Treyarch? by alexhard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      None of the last 3 or so have even been good, so what are you talking about?

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    3. Re:Treyarch? by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      COD4 was a masterpiece. As far as multilayer shooters go, it basically set the bar. Previously, CounterStrike held this honor. Before everyone starts screaming, go look at how many people are playing whatever game you are going to bring up, and then go find out that CS 1.6 still has more players, 10 years later. Granted, it's obvious today that COD4 isn't going to have the staying power that CS had, that doesn't detract from the fact that it is one of the best shooters in recent memory. FAR surpassing the other COD games, and nearly every other shooter.

      The real problem here isn't the games, or the studios, it's the consoles forcing a model onto the PC world that doesn't work here. That should be the point of the discussion. Because I am fairly certain that all new COD games from here on out are going to be focused on the console market, as COD6 /MW2 was.

    4. Re:Treyarch? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Because they want to have CoDs coming out yearly (ask Kotick why) but they couldn't make Infinity Ward make one per year? Of course now IW isn't going to make any more CoD games (well, a company by that name might but almost none of the MW2 staff remains) so it doesn't really matter.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:Treyarch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree; the root of all the complaints is consolization, and I think that trend is only going to continue. Obviously some genres just don't translate well to the console (RTS games in particular, but others as well), but the numbers don't lie; console game sales are increasing and PC game sales are decreasing. PC is still doing relatively well today, but I'm not sure how long that's going to last. As the studios continue to whine about piracy and the console market continues to expand, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them slowly began pulling out of the shrinking PC market in the next 5 years or so.

    6. Re:Treyarch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CS 1.6 still has a lot of players indeed. Though your point still stands, CS:S has more now:

      http://store.steampowered.com/stats/

  7. Nice one by wulfmans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slow news day eh' ?

    1. Re:Nice one by Svippy · · Score: 1

      While yeah, this story might seem rather pointless, it does come in a context that seems important. Well, interesting at least.

      The whole controversy between Activision and Infinity Ward is hilarious at best. Also terrible, but hey.

      Now I wanna stress that I am not really a fan of Call of Duty, I liked the first one, but then... it became kinda meh, because even when the first one was out, the Second World War was already getting used to the limit. I guess people really love that war. But I suppose it made sense. It had excitement, deception, treason, spying, first real airborne warfare, crazy leaders, ideologies, a Europe in changing and the setting for a new world order. Blimey!

      But despite all that, I still find the First World War much more interesting, not for the war itself, but for the whole political affairs behind it. It was complicated shit. In WW2, some guy just wanted some revenge over some other war because some people did something. Woosh. What excitement.

      But I digress. People have been wondering if Infinity Ward, in its current sorry state, would even be able to provide a new title of its best selling franchise. Sure it would, Activision would force it upon it. But I will make a quick prediction. It's going to suck.

      Now give me a real game, and here I am talking about Victoria 2 which is coming out this Late Summer/Early Autumn.

      --
      Clicked pie.
    2. Re:Nice one by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Why haven't they made a RTS WWI game?

      Dig trenches, tunnels if the ground permits. Have to deal and deal with chemical attacks, build up of muddy conditions as well as piles of bodies.

      If it wasn't so depressing, it might be fun....

    3. Re:Nice one by icebraining · · Score: 1

      They made at least four, but according to reviews they're pretty shitty.

  8. DRM by Das+Auge · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me go get some Astroglide before I have to deal with the DRM that will come with that game. :(

    1. Re:DRM by inf4mia · · Score: 1

      Let me go get some Astroglide before I have to deal with the DRM that will come with that game. :(

      We're sorry, our DRM system will only the use of Activision approved lubricants. In the future, please use an approved sand based lubricant for a smooth entertainment experience.

    2. Re:DRM by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Or you know.. you could actually not by the game ;]

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  9. Coming from COD MW2 by JaCKeL+1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fool me once, shame on you, you won't fool me twice.

    1. Re:Coming from COD MW2 by Nested · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

    2. Re:Coming from COD MW2 by EnsilZah · · Score: 4, Funny

      Geeze, what a terribly mangled misquote, the actual saying goes "Fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.".

    3. Re:Coming from COD MW2 by furball · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you. Fool me thrice I break your fucking neck.

    4. Re:Coming from COD MW2 by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, my version goes like this:

      Fool me once, ... I break your fucking neck. (Then shame on you.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  10. Ohhh! by WSOGMM · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if I get to kill terrorists instead of join them this time! ... who am I kidding, I liked gunning down civilians.

    1. Re:Ohhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NAAH, so can't mod up, but that was fun indeed! :O

  11. No thanks by Montezumaa · · Score: 1

    Even if this were to be the best CoD game in the franchise, I will not give any further economic support to a corporation that so easily and freely violates the contracts they have with their employees. I also will no longer support corporations that no longer listen to customers and give them what they want in a product(MW2 was just one of the many examples). I quit purchasing EA games after Ubisoft started screwing customers with the "constant internet connection" fiasco.

    This is a really sad time, as there are some good games on the horizon, but they are backed by ethically corrupt corporations.

    1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pray that you do not shop at WAL*MART then.

      Also, in the US, we have this philosophy about innocent until proven guilty... so do not close the book on Activision yet.

    2. Re:No thanks by smartr · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read those employee contracts? I mean, sure, it's a shame that the Infinity Ward employees all decided to jump ship and launch a multimillion dollar lawsuit against their employer. On the other hand, they sold out. I repeat, they sold out. What were they expecting? Now they're EA's bitches.

    3. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're boycotting EA because of Ubisoft's DRM?

      I hope that was just a mistype.

  12. Cue Moral Outrage.... by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1

    ...as an angry mob of rightwing Christian/'Think Of The Children'/Reactionary Old Priests/Shills For Any Of The Above Actually Working For A Rival Media Corporation pressure groups attacks this game for its graphic depiction of secret illegal military operations inside the sovereign territory of a fellow member of the United Nations with which the United States is not legally or officially at war with.

    Nah... that's too long and complicated. They'll just say its violent and ban it in Australia.

    1. Re:Cue Moral Outrage.... by drej · · Score: 1

      And in Germany. Or at least they'll butcher it.

    2. Re:Cue Moral Outrage.... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Christians? Oh dear. No, no. Unless there's tits. Then, and only then, will they protest against this abomination unto the lord.

  13. Never again.... by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

    Call of Duty/Modern Warfare is dead to me....I got screwed on MW2 and I won't do it again, and I can hold a grudge for a long time, my PS2 died shortly after launch, and guess how many Sony products I've purchased in the last 9 years? Can you say 0? That includes Sony movies, music, music players, computers, games, etc... screw em. Activision can find out the hard way too.

    1. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh. Scary. By the sound of it you fight infidelity by never having sex with anyone other than Mr. Righty.

    2. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my xbox360 died....big surprise right? Guess what I did...

      I bought the Elite version as a replacement =D

      Then guess what happened.....I got console banned for being an immoral pirate.... Guess what I did next? Bought another Elite.

      Still cheaper than paying for games hahahaha

    3. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh and your too much of a pussy to even post on your real account.

      Oh wait, your just a troll.

      Nevermind, your not even to that level yet. Your still somewhere below the "45 year old virgin living in mothers basement" level.

    4. Re:Never again.... by coolsnowmen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get boycotting a company, but Sony is a brand, all of their subsidiary are manages by different people, I had a great experience with sony's digital camera company but a horrible one with their PlayStation. I'ld consider them different companies when it comes to specific products and not over arching policies.
      Jon

    5. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why buy new ones when you can just swap out the guts and serial with another one?

    6. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said the Anonymous Fuck to ignorant to realize everyone will see through the fact that you are Immostlyharmless posting anonymously in response.

    7. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this I see? Oh yes, Sony is a company just like I thought.

      Nice try.

    8. Re:Never again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MW2 killed your PS2?

    9. Re:Never again.... by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      Do what you want, but MW2 had one of the best FPS single player campaigns (albeit short) in a long time.

  14. End of the historical shooters? by taxman_10m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too bad. I enjoyed World at War very much and was looking forward to the Korean War and/or Vietnam.

    1. Re:End of the historical shooters? by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Hmm Korean war. There's something new. A pity that game devs don't do "new".

      MASH 4077 the FPS. :)

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    2. Re:End of the historical shooters? by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how I'd feel about COD: Vietnam. But I have this exciting training sequence in mind where you play a congressman's son, playing poker and doing blow in the barracks of the Texas National Guard.

    3. Re:End of the historical shooters? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Didn’t we already have enough historical shooters? I think it’s a completely dead and sucked dry concept. Just like fantasy RPGs and default shooters. There is no way anyone could possibly make that feel fresh again. Because even every combination was tried.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:End of the historical shooters? by Knara · · Score: 1

      I dunno, there's never really "enough", but there's certainly too many "half-assed" historical shooters out there. I don't care if it's "fresh" (whatever that means), I care if it's *good*.

  15. Honor Remembrance Day by failedlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is really pissing me off. This game launches 2 days before Remembrance Day. MW2 launched the day before. I have more than enough respect for veterans and people serving right now, that I'm not going to respect any company that employs such cheap and tasteless marketing tactics. Even if it is the best game ever - they will never see one cent from me for this game nor will I ever play it.

    Should they decide to move the release date, I might consider it at some future point. I realize that it is being released Christmas so there is some logical reasoning. It would be welcome to hear from the publisher exactly why this particular date was chosen to launch the game.

    1. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Without the "paid murderers" fighting on your side, "paid murderers" from the other side would have killed you or your ancestors a long time ago. Keep that in mind.

    2. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      maybe Canada should burn down the White House again, or again. heh

    3. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to border patrols, Mexican military (or imposters) have been making forays and shooting across the border.

    4. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Toonol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i don't know what country you live in but it's been a long time since anyone has invaded the US.

      Thank those 'paid murderers'; we've got great ones, and without them we'd have long since been (successfully) invaded. You really don't see the cause and effect?

    5. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You're going to avoid a game based *solely* on its release date, which you perceive to be some kind of cheap marketing ploy? It is, but that is beside the point. You are aware that Veterans Day weekend is a huge shopping and social event, right? Somehow I doubt you would refuse to buy a car from a dealership who participates in a Veterans Day weekend sale (though perhaps you would refrain from purchasing it during the sale, which is also just as pointless). Historically the Call of Duty series has seen releases in late October and early-to-mid November, so it's not like this is anything new. It doesn't have anything to do with respect, and I think you are just being too sensitive.

    6. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Without the "paid murderers" fighting on your side, "paid murderers" from the other side would have killed you or your ancestors a long time ago. Keep that in mind.

      Technically, all wars in which U.S. had the moral high ground (WW 1 & 2, Korea) was fought by drafted soldiers, not professionals.

      (Though the "paid murderer" remark is very disrespectful, regardless - I guess policemen are "paid murderers", too?).

    7. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, all wars in which U.S. had the moral high ground (WW 1 & 2, Korea) was fought by drafted soldiers, not professionals.

      (Though the "paid murderer" remark is very disrespectful, regardless - I guess policemen are "paid murderers", too?).

      I notice the lack of Vietnam....which was decidedly lacking on the whole moral high-ground stance. "Oh No, the Vietnamese democratically and freely elected the Communist Party, we can't have that!" I won't even touch the more recent wars, since some of them have been morally ambiguous.

    8. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I notice the lack of Vietnam....which was decidedly lacking on the whole moral high-ground stance.

      Indeed, and note how anti-war protests in U.S. were also driven by the fact that U.S. soldiers fighting with Vietnam were draftees, not volunteers.

    9. Re:Honor Remembrance Day by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Because most of the westernized world (their target market) has it as a day off.

      Probably as simple as that..

      oh and some marketing goon probably thinks he's being clever.. considering (afaik) none of their titles deal with WW1, it's nothing more then a gimmick.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  16. Hooray! by mmaniaci · · Score: 5, Funny
    And the world will stand still in anticipation as these leaders of the gaming world release another of their ground-breaking Call of Duty games. This game is sure to push the envelope of the first person shooter genre of videogaming with its amazing new features:
    • Crosshair (patent pending) - In Call of Duty: Black Ops, players will enjoy the revolutionary new crosshair feature, unseen by any FPS game to this date.
    • Enemies that hide (USPTO D772719) - For the first time EVER enemies will duck and hide behind boxes, sandbags, and other cover!
    • Realism - Because we know real-life isn't real enough!
    • A full-featured single player game - Experience an unprecedented 5 hours of gameplay in the new Call of Duty: Black Ops! Travel through ONE tileset and fight ONE type of enemy in the expansive and immersive new world that looks and is the exact same as our previous game.
    • AntiSkidRow (tm) DRM - With an always on DRM system you can rest easy knowing that the evil terrorist pirates pedophiles are not undermining the American Way Of Life. (note: all DRM servers will be down for scheduled maintenance starting on November 9th. Downtime unknown).
    • Downloadable content - Unluck multiplayer, tactical nuke launcher, achievements, a rootkit, much more from the XBox live store! No downloads are required since this content is already ON YOUR GAME DISC.

    I don't know about you, but I'm pre-ordering my copy of Call of Duty: Go Fuck Yourself today!

  17. It's not really Black Ops... by TSRX · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you announce it to the world.

    1. Re:It's not really Black Ops... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      Well, it's politically correct. Call of Duty: Shootin' Dark People for Oil was just the working title.

  18. Is Treyarch actually making a game this time? by nataflux · · Score: 1

    Or is it just going to be one of those copy and paste deals where they reuse the engine that IW coded and just reskin the game? I think the latter is more likely.

    1. Re:Is Treyarch actually making a game this time? by XAD1975 · · Score: 1

      The later, of course. You wouldn't want Kotick to risk his investors money into a game that may contain innovation and possibly fail?

  19. Hidden Message? by Bugamn · · Score: 1

    Black Ops?

    What do they do? Hidden things like killing rebellious developers? You know what I'm talking about.

  20. No, no,your interpretation is not correct by Motard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see why you would assume this is a game about covert action, but in reality, it's about combat in total darkness.

    They saved a ton of time and money on the graphics.

    1. Re:No, no,your interpretation is not correct by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah so it is basically Doom 3 :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  21. Zombies (Vietnambies) by TPoise · · Score: 1

    As long as it has a Zombies mode, I'll pre-order.

  22. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said the Anonymous Fuck to ignorant to realize everyone will see through the fact that you are Immostlyharmless posting anonymously in response.

    I could say the same to you, but then we risk going into infinite recursion. :)

  23. RE: CoD4 a masterpiece by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Agreed about CoD 4. As a Mac OS X user, I find myself playing CoD 4 quite often, to this day. Partially, that's because I own the native OS X version and there aren't a whole lot of good game options for native OS X out there. But it's ALSO largely because it's a good enough game to have that kind of "staying power". To this day, I keep finding custom servers to connect to that download all sorts of modified maps and games. Many are taken from mods done for earlier 3D shooter titles (like Unreal Tournament) -- but they're still just as fun, if not better than ever, on a more modern game title.

    (Just last week, I played a "freeze tag" version of a Team Deathmatch game on a custom CoD 4 server. It was a LOT of fun, and I wasn't expecting it. When you shot an enemy, you froze them in a block of ice. Then they were only able to sit and observe the game going on around them, unless/until a team-mate was able to run up to them and hold down a button to thaw the ice (took a few seconds to fully melt the ice too - so there was a risk of getting shot while in the middle of a rescue).

    With the restrictions on Internet multiplayer in the newer CoD titles, all of this is completely "out the window" and makes me uninterested in buying them -- at least at anywhere near their asking prices.

  24. I am NOT going to play this by Follier · · Score: 1

    ... officially.

  25. So much for my Choice... by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

    I am still waiting for my Call of Duty: Grenada.

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  26. Hah. Oh boy. Another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh. Respawn will make something superior.

  27. Treyarch Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Infinity Ward is the only company that's made decent COD games, COD 3 and 5 were both worthless. The contrast and playability sucked compared to COD2, COD4 and MW2.