Slashdot Mirror


First Non-Latin TLDs Go Online Today

eldavojohn writes "ICANN today switched on the country code top level domains for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, which are the first non-Latin TLDs available and are also fully readable right to left. Slashdot does not support them but you can find the TLDs in the BBC article. ICANN said it had 21 more requests for TLDs in 11 different languages. A quick note — if you do not have the language packs installed, you may experience unpredictable browser behavior in the URL bar. Right now countries like China and Thailand have implemented workarounds to achieve the same effect."

302 comments

  1. Really? by Tekfactory · · Score: 3, Funny

    China and Thailand have implemented workarounds to achieve unpredictable browser behavior in the URL bar?

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, like www.bankofamerica.com.secure.cn

    2. Re:Really? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, like www.bankofamerica.com.secure.cn

      I have a better one: www.bankofamerica.com.secure.ru.

      It has an algorithm that predicts what expenses you will have in the near future and withdraws your money and puts it in a safe account that's unknown to you so that you don't spend it. They did that to me - took all my money out - and then all I have to do is send them an email and they'll pay my bills - all for a $19.95 monthly service fee on my CC. I can't loose!

      This is my first month on this program, so I'll let you guys know how it works.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Really? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, they are a little behind. They just implemented AOL keywords.

    4. Re:Really? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got a better one. www.bankofamerica.com. See, I used Unicode character 212e instead of the e. Looks the same to most people, and would probably fool quite a bit of people. I wonder how they hope to stop situations like this. (I actaully used an e, because slashdot wouldn't let me put in the HTML entity, but this is good enough to demonstrate the problem)

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I actaully used an e, because slashdot wouldn't let me put in the HTML entity, but this is good enough to demonstrate the problem

      So, if you only could have done it, you might have done it.

      Now I'm really scared.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't wait to register mohammed.com in arabic and redirect it to goatse!

      You realize that now every Anonymous Coward is a target, right?

      Thanks a lot.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Really? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Isn't that Bank of Nicolai

      I have pen!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Really? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just for anybody who is interested and lazy... javascript:alert(unescape("http://www.bankofam%u212ercia.com"))

      It doesn't look exactly like 'e', but it's certainly close enough to fool some people.

    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      TFS said Slashdot doesn't support those URLs. That doesn't mean the rest of the internet can't.

    10. Re:Really? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do that to ebay.com paypal.com, etc.... It opens up a world of unholy hell for all the scammers on this planet to make it even harder to determine if a site is real or fake....

      Thanks ICANN!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Really? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ironically, "http://www.bankofamercia.com" is probably close enough to fool some people too, and doesn't require any fancy javascript. ;)

    12. Re:Really? by boxwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have an even better one: www.bankofamerica.com

      It has an algorithm that increases my taxes and deposits the money into their executive bonus pool.

    13. Re:Really? by jgagnon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Better... redirect it to a government site in Israel.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    14. Re:Really? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I don't know, man... the one you posted is notorious for pretending to be a bank but taking unexplained fees out whenever they feel like it. Reverse psychology, good show.

    15. Re:Really? by OnlyJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The solution is pretty already for the most part in place, and occurs at the browser level. Most of the browser vendors have known about this for years (since 2005 I believe) and implement a combination of whitelists, phishing filters, and Punycode to avert the problem .

      Other possibilities they could add is highlighting the background of any URL not in the user's native character set, or that uses characters of different sets, write those suspect characters in bold, or pop up a security dialog. The problems with these approaches it that they are much more prone to user error than a default-enabled filter. How many real-users (as in, outside the slashdot crowd) would known what the changed background or bold letters mean? How many just ignore any popup dialog that appears and hit OK to get on with it? At least something like Punycode it's a lot easier to see something wrong with the URL, and the phishing screens are much more likely to be noticed than a simple pop-up.

    16. Re:Really? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      lol oops

    17. Re:Really? by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Phishing aside I would say the biggest concern here is the fact we are effectively walling off parts of the internet for respective regions.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    18. Re:Really? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Personally, I thought it looked more like a Theta than an E.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    19. Re:Really? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      How is that? The TLDs are not location dependent.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    20. Re:Really? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      I got a better one. www.bankofamerica.com. See, I used Unicode character 212e instead of the e. Looks the same to most people, and would probably fool quite a bit of people.

      It's a few points taller than an "e" plus some vertical padding on either side of the letter. At normal tooltip or status bar sizes it would be nearly impossible to tell appart from a sucky font even if you were looking for it... guess that's the point.

      To see the character itself under Windows:

      Start \ Run \ charmap.exe

      Scroll down about two thirds of the way and it's on the righthand side, right before those mysterious 1/3 2/3 1/8 and 1/8 signs. When you click on it, there's a zoomed view with the Unicode #. I don't know how to write it in Windows, though.

    21. Re:Really? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      But not everyone has support for the character sets in question. I think that might be what the gp was talking about.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    22. Re:Really? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      But the people who can read the languages do, and we're getting to the point where you have to go out of your way not to have the required IMEs available to you. It's been awhile since I've had to do anything other than change a setting in a control panel to get Chinese input working.

      And if you don't know how to use the IME or read the language, why would you care if you can access the website? The content was already walled off from you and will remain so until you update your wetware.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    23. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha. The other one looks wrong. You got me though. I had to read it a few times letter by letter to see the problem and I certainly wouldn't have checked it more than once had it been my real bank I was logging into. The problem with missing letters, misspelled words, adding letters, similar letters, etc. is you don't read every letter in a word... to know what the word was that someone was writing. You use a combination of the other words etc. to make out what the words are and skip what isn't needed. Sometimes we skip too much though and that is often why we have communications problems. Or we fail to write it all down.

    24. Re:Really? by mirix · · Score: 1

      I guess browsers should start rendering non CP-437 characters in a different color (in the address bar), to make it apparent if someone is cheating. Shouldn't be hard to implement.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    25. Re:Really? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they hope to stop situations like this.

      As I understand it, certain Unicode characters are not allowed in IDNS (Internationalized DNS) names. If there's nine versions of the letter 'e' then the only one that's allowed is U+0065; any other version of that character will get normalized into an 'e'.

      There's more to it than that, of course, but there has been plenty written about this; here's a starting place.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    26. Re:Really? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      I really hope a CA doesn't issue an EV certificate for that, and I doubt they would. Maybe you could get some ghetto CA to sign it with a normal cert, but a pervasive "green bar is good!1" thought process will kick in eventually, and at least minimize the attack.

      I can only hope... but I don't hold my breath for 'random joe on the Internets' security to ever match his expectations.

    27. Re:Really? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      I don't know, man... the one you posted is notorious for pretending to be a bank but taking unexplained fees out whenever they feel like it. Reverse psychology, good show.

      Isn't that the definition of a bank??

    28. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an URL ends in ".eg" then you know (or can easily look up) that it is for Egypt. Now the URL will end in unrecognizable Arabic that will make it impossible to identify what country it is from.

    29. Re:Really? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like www.bankofamerica.com.secure.cn

      The domains are to be whitelisted:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name#ASCII_spoofing_concerns

      That sounds even worse than a blacklist, and in fact means yet _another_ link in the HTTP chain, this one a SPoF.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    30. Re:Really? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The url is presumably going to be in the same language as the content of the site. If your computer doesn't have the character set for the url, the whole website isn't going to work. I expect that if they have an english/french etc version of the site, they would continue to use the roman url for that.

    31. Re:Really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you don't know how to type a URL what makes you think you will be able to read the content of the site?

      Oh, okay, Russian pr0n, fair enough.

      I rarely type URLs anyway, instead I mostly use search engine links and bookmarks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the people who can read the languages do, and we're getting to the point where you have to go out of your way not to have the required IMEs available to you. It's been awhile since I've had to do anything other than change a setting in a control panel to get Chinese input working.

      Bummer if you want to use a webcafe in a foreign country.

      Or send an e-mail from home to a foreign address written on paper in a language you can't write.

  2. Good news everybody! by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot does not support them

    It is now possible to get a domain that cannot be slashdotted!

    1. Re:Good news everybody! by leuk_he · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes you can slashdot them, but you cannot show a correct text-. Yet...

    2. Re:Good news everybody! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      anyone else find it ironic that after killing latin chars from the root URL, the page redirects to http://(sitename the /. wont display)/ar/default.aspx

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:Good news everybody! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      uh, damn, I think I broke the /code link generation in that post

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  3. Thats all good by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But they will still need Latin characters to type "http://"

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
    1. Re:Thats all good by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't the Latin URL start off with "HTTPUS" for the URLUS?

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    2. Re:Thats all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You no longer need to type http:// in most browsers to visit a web page since what, 1995 or so?

    3. Re:Thats all good by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 1

      Yes but you still need to type it when making a hyperlink in your mark up language of choice.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
    4. Re:Thats all good by medcalf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That depends on if you interpret "hypertext" as motion towards, in which case the answer is no, or not, in which case the answer is yes.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    5. Re:Thats all good by HiVizDiver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean HTTPVS/URLVS?

    6. Re:Thats all good by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      SPQR://

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Thats all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if your browser is a stone tablet...

    8. Re:Thats all good by neokushan · · Score: 1

      The markup language hasn't changed, though, just the adresses. Even a 100% arabic website is still going to have standard HTML inside it.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    9. Re:Thats all good by TheRocketMan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the Latin URL start off with "HTTPUS" for the URLUS?

      Onay, "ttphay://", ightray?

    10. Re:Thats all good by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Even most 100% English websites don't have standard HTML. Perhaps you meant non-standard or sub-standard?

    11. Re:Thats all good by corbettw · · Score: 1

      "The people called Hyper they go the text?"

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    12. Re:Thats all good by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These Protocols are crazy!

    13. Re:Thats all good by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't the Latin URL start off with "HTTPUS" for the URLUS?

      Only works if your DNS server is properly configured to return the proper IP addressus
      CCXVI.XXXIV.CLXXXI.XLV

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    14. Re:Thats all good by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I meant IE6 standard.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    15. Re:Thats all good by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Well, https has an s, so it's obviously plural. So for Secure HTTP, in Latin, you'd have to type httpii://

    16. Re:Thats all good by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called a "Newton", you insensitive clod!

    17. Re:Thats all good by IICV · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but localhost is CXXVII...I

      And that just makes you look indecisive.

    18. Re:Thats all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I demand an RFC
      And a Linux implementation

      Captcha: nonzero

    19. Re:Thats all good by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That's only for those who learned latin from a pig. :) I was told a long time ago to not listen to talk farm animals, no matter how honest they may seem. It's even more important to avoid the flying kind, unless you provided the propulsion. I find a regular arm catapult or counterweight trebuchet to be entertaining, but rocket power is definitely the best way to go. You have to be careful though if you plan on reusing the pig.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Thats all good by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Hahaha.

          I did something like that a long time ago, because AOL was complaining about receiving email from hosted customers that didn't have reverse DNS. We couldn't possibly provide each user on virtual hosting servers with their own IP's, and we couldn't just pick one customer to show, so we initially provided the hostname of the machine as the reverse (a01.nyc.example.com). They responded that they wouldn't allow hostnames like that. I changed it to show the IP with our name at the end (192.168.1.1.example.com), which they refused. I then changed it to provide the IP in roman numbers, with our generic hostname at the end (192.168.1.1 = CXCII.CLXVII.I.I.example.com). They told us that the names were obviously not unique to the machines, since the first three "words" were the same for 254 different machines. I then reversed the number portion of it (192.168.1.1 = I.I.CLXVII.CXCI.example.com). That satisfied them, so we kept it for a long time. Once in a while, I'd get someone that referenced the inverse roman numeral hostname, which I always thought was entertaining. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    21. Re:Thats all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I demand an RFC

      RFC 2551 is a good start.

  4. Non-latin TLDs? by kvezach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, hooray for a more fragmented Internet. While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native". Sure, the sites can also register an ordinary domain name, but then why not just use that domain name to begin with?

    1. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native".

      For now, I hope so. Imagine a RTL domain name, coupled with a phishing email telling recipients to visit moc.tfosorcim.[NEWGTLD] that renders as [NEWGTLD].microsoft.com. Won't that be fun?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by drachenstern · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not to feed the trolls, but since you're registered: It's called a link. Imagine that.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    3. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone with a Western Keyboard can type A-Z and a-z. Not so with other countries keyboards. (btw, you can still type the unicode characters in windows, its just much more difficult). But really, if they have a Chinese language URL, and a site that is entirely written in Chinese, are they worried about not having you as a potential customer, when you can't figure out how to connect using their language?

      There are more people online in China than live in the US. This is going to be awesome for their local online economies, as people will be able to use their native languages.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic

      utter bullshit

      plenty of keyboards have no Latin characters by default however all keyboards can be used to enter any character set through software

    5. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just install the input methods for any of those languages, and type the characters with any keyboard.

    6. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When was the last time you had to type in a relativelly unknown URL? (not things like google, gmail, your bank, etc.)

      For that matter, when was the last time you had to type an URL of a site in a language which is off-limits to you anyway?...

      This might help greatly in popularization of the internet in large part of so called "developing countries", especially since the biggest changes can be expected when the common folks get hang of it; they are much more likely to be fluent only in their native language and script. Or - imagine the uptake of the internet in the latin world if all URLs were in, say, the Georgian alphabet.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Steve+Max · · Score: 1

      If only someone could implement a system that points from one page to another, a "link" between them if you will. Maybe some text or image where the user could click and be redirected to some other page. Would that be even possible?

      Now more seriously, how often do you type the URL for a site in a language you can't speak? Even if you do that sometimes, I'd say you would be able to get there by a Google search written in your native charset. I don't see this as a big issue.

    8. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this a boon for russian scamers.

      some letters in russian cyrillic look like latin characters but have different uses. example, the cyrillic character that looks like a "C", is actually aquivalent to "S", their "H" is actually our "N". so a TLD ".som" in cyrillic would be seen on the screen (and understood by westerners) as ".com".

      so here's my suggestion to firefox developers: put some easy to see visual clue on the address bar to tell exactly in which language or character set the URL is written in.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    9. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be a real problem, because normal users don't type URLs, except into Google/Yahoo/Yandex/Baidu/etc.

      If you have doubts, just watch any non-software geek use a web browser for 30 seconds. The search field is the new location bar.

    10. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for the fact they didn't know any better, watching someone type Facebook or Google (AUGH) into the search bar would cause me to want to punch their face in. The worst part is if they typed it into the location bar it'd probably suggest the right one for them anyway.

    11. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This way lots of non-English speakers, or even users of non-Latin alphabets, can use the Internet much better than they could before. Only half of the world uses Latin. So the other half is more or less excluded because domain names have those limitations, so just to be able to use the Internet they first have to learn a foreign script (a phonetic script - Chinese for example is not phonetic, so that in itself is a huge challenge for a Chinese to learn).

      But you probably never set foot outside of your own country, let alone into a place where people actually use such a non-Latin script. If you did so you may start to understand why this is a Very Good Thing.

      And the Internet is not going to be more "fragmented". When is the last time you visited say a Swedish or French or Hungarian web site? It is not that they use a different script or so. However I have the feeling that you still can not read what is written there - so that is "fragmented" already for you. And as long as you do not learn how read Arabic or Japanese or Chinese you will not likely want to visit any of those web sites that use Arabic, Japanese or Chinese native characters for name.

    12. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'm just waiting for people to put up those domains and then push out trojans under the guise of "font packs".

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    13. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I type in urls all the time. It ismuch faster and safer way of Internet surfing.

      Besides most links and ad and cookie information. Even if I use google enter a search term to get to some companies main page I then manually type in the address to make sure google isn't getting ad dollars.

      Of course I am defintely not normal

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It would be strange for (in that case) some Arabic TLD to 1) render correctly in a browser of a non-Arabic speaker, and 2) to have Latin characters in the domain name itself and 3) still manage to look correct in RTL scripts.

    15. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      This might help greatly in popularization of the internet in large part of so called "developing countries", especially since the biggest changes can be expected when the common folks get hang of it; they are much more likely to be fluent only in their native language and script.

      And seeing that most minority languages adopt the Latin alphabet these days, how is the support of Arabic script going to help them?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by spinlight · · Score: 1

      There are more people online in China than live in the US. This is going to be awesome for their local online economies, as people will be able to use their native languages.

      Firstly, I am curious where you would have obtained these numbers. Can you cite this?

      Secondly, given the global context, shouldn't it be more a question of whether there are more people who use Latin keyboards as opposed to non-Latin, rather than one of whether China or the US has more people online? That reasoning seems to suffer from a US-centric (or China-centric) perspective. While the novelty of using a native language has its merits, it seems to me that there should be a discussion of whether the potential harm of non-Latin TLDs is outweighed by this appeal. IMHO, a good argument could be made that this move reinforces the "Great Firewall" (a Bad Thing TM), since it adds an additional barrier to international co-mingling.

      Isn't ICANN an international non-profit organization? This seems more like catering to special interests than "preserving the operational stability of the internet".

      --
      "I do not avoid women, Mandrake . . . but I do deny them my essence." - Gen. Ripper
    17. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "Most"? Sources, please. Plus you yourself gave an example of one area with vibrant script that is quite distinct from Latin ones.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Because local people, which are much more important to them than you, cannot read, remember and write that.

    19. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      The way it would work is more like

      internal:
      [NEWGTLD].microsoft.com

      view:
      com.microsoft.[NEWGTLD]

      Keyboard/mouse selection within com or microsoft would be LTR since latin characters are LTR, but then it would do crazy things that seem, at first, unpredictable, once you cross a neutral (eg. the period) or RTL character. This is only on a machine localized to use RTL by default. Latin machines would show it the first way, unless you specifically embed control characters in the URL. I imagine that's still not allowed, hopefully by standard but at least by browsers with any hope of phishing security.

    20. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Insightful?

      This has been possible for years.

      The only difference today is that there are also TLDs in non-latin alphabets. For a long time you could have [chinese-characters].com and so on. So what you're talking about happened way back when.

      Anyway, just click a link if for some reason you can't type it (though I can type Chinese and Arabic characters on my US-104 keyboard, not sure why you can't).

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    21. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Malc · · Score: 1

      You mean that it can't be URLEncoded?

    22. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=it_net_user&idim=country:CHN&dl=en&hl=en&q=chinese+internet+users

      This is pretty close as of 2008, and a naive projection into 2010 says it's a very reasonable guess that Chinese Internet users have exceeded the US population.

      Much of the Internet does not have a "global context". Most individual websites are not meant for global consumption, they are meant for consumption in one language. I think the reinforcement of the "Great Firewall" is overstated given that there's already a language barrier which is quite a bit harder to overcome than the "typing strange letters" barrier (unless by some miracle the entire website is unusually amenable to Google translate). A lot of the world was already relying on links or memorizing how to input foreign characters. This now moves that inconvenience from always being the non-Latin user's problem, to users trying to access a site that uses a different keyboard layout from the regional. I'd bet that's less often a problem and it's a more rational distribution.

      This caters to some very general interests -- making the Internet work in languages that were not spawned from Europe (even many European languages need to compromise today).

      There is a good argument of harm to existing users, but that argument comes from phishing; it isn't really about denying people access to regional websites.

    23. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I don't trust my own typing. I copy/paste, or type a few letters and let Awesome Bar fill it in, or click a link, or type into the google search with auto-suggest. If it's a new site, I put the URL I think it is into google and evaluate the results to make sure I typed it correctly.

      Yep I'm midway OCD and I can't take out the trash without my house keys in my pocket, but these are usually faster than typing - even the google search is, depending on your connection, because it usually auto-fills anything worth visiting. One day it will auto-fill the scam website because people keep searching to see if it's a scam, but that's why you don't just click the first link blindly.

    24. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      so here's my suggestion to firefox developers: put some easy to see visual clue on the address bar to tell exactly in which language or character set the URL is written in.

      Firefox already shows the punycode rather than the Unicode expression of the domain name, so it's already obvious - you'll see xn-whatever instead of the real domain name.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    25. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they are good for super-short url shorteners.

      --
      -mkb
    26. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      internal:
      [NEWGTLD].microsoft.com

      This is exactly wrong.

      The internal representation is microsoft.com.[newtld].

      When you are storing mixed runs of LTR and RTL characters, the storage order doesn't change; it's in reading order.

      Domain resolution would be impossible if the internal representation depended on the display order.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    27. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It would be strange for (in that case) some Arabic TLD to 1) render correctly in a browser of a non-Arabic speaker, and 2) to have Latin characters in the domain name itself and 3) still manage to look correct in RTL scripts.

      Think of how many programs you use that display clickable links. Imagine how many of them will get bug reports that non-Latin links "don't look right". Of those, a lot of authors will use heuristics to detect and handle non-Latin TLDs, like if (link.tld.contains('-')) { fancyRTLDisplayLink(link); } else { displayLink(link); }. One of the examples from the article (I just skimmed it! Don't cast me out!) was http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx . Suppose that was http://moc.tfosorcim.xn--wgbh1c/ and that clickable link was detected as non-Latin and helpfully rendered prettily for our non-English-speaking friends.

      So the big guys - Firefox, Chrome, (possibly) IE, Outlook - might get it right. What about your IM client?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    28. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While every keyboard can type A-Za-z

      I'm not really sure what you mean by that. Every keyboard can be configured to produce Latin (or English: after all, let's not forget that the English alphabet includes a couple of letters that aren't in Latin, like J and U and W), but not every keyboard is configured to do so by default.

      Similarly, every keyboard *can* be configured to produce Arabic or Chinese characters, although depending on where you are located, not every keyboard is.

      I fail to see the problem, really. Arabic folks had to adapt to the English alphabet for ages when they wanted to load an English website - or in fact any website, since they couldn't even type "$FOOBAR.eg" or whatever without having to type ".eg", even if $FOOBAR was in Arabic already.

      The only thing that's changing now is that English-speaking (or generally non-Arabic) folks will have to.. well, what will they have to do, actually? Between renormalization into an ASCII representation and the fact that sites catering to international audiences will of course make sure to have an English-alphabet domain name, you will be able to continue without ever having to learn how to type Arabic letters.

      And even if you did, it'd only take a bit of research so you'd learn HOW to do it; it's already a given that it possible to do.

      And all that's assuming that you're even using these sites at all. Tell me, when was the last time you looked at a website from Saudi Arabia?

      Really, I fail to see the problem.

    29. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Plus you yourself gave an example of one area with vibrant script that is quite distinct from Latin ones.

      To be fair, the Arabic script is losing ground. They've lost Indonesian (a major coup), Malaysian, and Turkish to the Latin script, and probably others that I'm not aware of.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    30. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by mzs · · Score: 1

      Read it again, he registered tfosorcim with the registrar for [NEWGTLD] so in a fancy new browser that supports RTL and world wide fonts he could make a subdomain moc that would look like this to an American:

      http://scribbles.microsoft.com/english/

      The scribbles could look like those for "Al-Saudiah" or "Misr" for example. It's an interesting thought and it all comes down to how carefully the registrars will police themselves and that those scribbles do look funny and are not arbitrary, so even is someday we allow .österreich as well as .at say, it still will not be LTR. So as long as the top level domains created will look generally funny to latin users, I think it's pretty safe. The look alike characters issues are more of a worry for registrars that don't check applications.

    31. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Kickasso · · Score: 1

      These sites are in effect off-limits to you anyway. Not because you can't type an address (you can), but because you can't bloody read the friggin' content! Insightful my ass.

    32. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Or rational. If it's not a clearly marked "sponsored link" then Google isn't getting paid.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    33. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by HisMother · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I tried this: for the bankofamErcia example, I see http://www.xn--bankofamrcia-lra14ee268a.com/ which is very cool!

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    34. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I've worked as an IT consultant in an Arabic speaking country. In all my time there I've not seen a browser that didn't handle Arabic text (apart from early versions of Chromium), and I've seen plenty of mixed up Arabic/Latin text that makes sense to the people reading it.

      As for the TLDs and ccTLDs though... both Chromium and Firefox seem unable to render them properly on Ubuntu. I'm pretty sure that one of the OS X browsers did it correctly though.

      For this to behave differently in the browser of a non Arabic speaker, there would have to exist a special version of the browser that doesn't handle this correctly. OS X and Ubuntu handle Arabic text without having to install any special language packs. I guess Windows might do that too. I don't recall having any problems with Solaris either.

    35. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the other half is more or less excluded because domain names have those limitations, so just to be able to use the Internet they first have to learn a foreign script (a phonetic script - Chinese for example is not phonetic, so that in itself is a huge challenge for a Chinese to learn).

      Actually, the way that most Chinese people type on the computer is using a Latin keyboard to type pinyin phonetics. So they've already learned it whether or not they are using the internet. This is not going to change with the new TLD. The only difference is how it looks on the screen after they type it (and the fact that they don't have to click the icon to switch between Chinese and English input mode).

      When is the last time you visited say a Swedish or French or Hungarian web site? It is not that they use a different script or so. However I have the feeling that you still can not read what is written there - so that is "fragmented" already for you.

      An English speaker would have to be retarded to not be able to make basic sense of a Swedish or French web site. Hungarian, okay, that's harder.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    36. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, yes but on the other hand, maybe this will be the push needed to get away from the current very crappy and not-especially-well-thought-out certificate chain nonsense. If you actually had to get a certificate fingerprint from your bank in a trusted way rather than simply trust Thawter or Verisign or whoever, it would be a much better system.

    37. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did actually end up at some Hungarian and Japanese sites. Yes, I did not understand the writing, but I was only there for the pictures ;)

    38. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by negRo_slim · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree we need a new system in place to handle finance, I suggest using human based locomotion to place your rotund gluteus maximus in the safe confines of a real establishment with real people, providing a top tier method of verifying where your money is going that nearly any lay person could use! And not only that; it would go a long way to help support your local economy while helping to expend your probably excess storage of chemical energy.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    39. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      if I use google enter a search term to get to some companies main page I then manually type in the address to make sure google isn't getting ad dollars.

      "I use their service but I ensures they don't get paid for it!"

      Seriously, if you don't like Google, why don't you use another search engine, and if it's not that, why go to such lengths to prevent remuneration? Search queries cost them real money, you know?

    40. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

      My personal website is hosted by a Norwegian provider (great service).

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    41. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      It would be strange for (in that case) some Arabic TLD to 1) render correctly in a browser of a non-Arabic speaker, and 2) to have Latin characters in the domain name itself and 3) still manage to look correct in RTL scripts.

      I'm using a Mac set up in English, and do a fair amount of Arabic and Farsi development work. Mixed Arabic-Latin URLs have worked fine for me, for as long as I can remember. I didn't do any special setup to enable this; they just worked.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    42. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Though the part with "losing ground" was about "minority languages"; they go simply extinct probably at least as often as adopting Latin alphabet...and I would be surpised if they were adopting Latin script more often than other (how many languages there are on Indian subcontinent? And how many are adopting non-local stripts?)
      Arabic having some losses doesn't mean it's not vibrant (and as far as number of users goes, perhaps even growing long-term?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    43. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Actually, the way that most Chinese people type on the computer is using a Latin keyboard to type pinyin phonetics.

      Not true - there are many more and much better ways to input Chinese. Most commonly used for traditional is Changjie, where every letter has a part of a character (many parts come back in characters). My keyboard has them all printed on the keys together with the normal letters. So basically they enter the characters directly, piece by piece, in a way similar to how we compose a word. The order matters as well of course.

      An English speaker would have to be retarded to not be able to make basic sense of a Swedish or French web site. Hungarian, okay, that's harder.

      Very very hard to do: the phonetics are different, grammar is different, you may be able to figure out the topic but that's about it really. Making basic sense of it, don't think so. I have learnt French in secondary school and can barely manage.

    44. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Arabic having some losses doesn't mean it's not vibrant (and as far as number of users goes, perhaps even growing long-term?)

      Vibrant, sure. But the losses from those three countries alone are about 350 million people; that's over one-third of the total number of people who use the Arabic script (Arabic, Urdu, Farsi, Pashto, etc.). It would take quite a while to make up that ground.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    45. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      ok, but how dos it render the URL for a russian, using the browser in russia to read russian sites using URLs in cyrillic ?

      if my native language had a diferent alphabet, i'd feel personally offended if my browser displayed the URL as a bunch of incomprehensible codes instead of properly rendered ...

      in short, my idea would be to actually display properly rendered , PLUS a flashing sign besides the address bar saying "this is not but "

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    46. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      BTW, do you know how many of those people actually switched? (and how permanent that switch might be...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    47. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Most commonly used for traditional is Changjie

      Traditional is a minority usage. Beijing has been encouraging the use of pinyin; it is taught in schools from an early age so most everyone is conversant in it.

      the phonetics are different, grammar is different, you may be able to figure out the topic but that's about it really. Making basic sense of it, don't think so.

      Neither of those (Swedish nor French) is my native language and I find English quite useful in making sense of them. I can get the point of newspaper articles and find my way around signs and warning labels and the like. Hell, I can halfway understand spoken Swedish on the radio/TV.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    48. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Well, the populations were lower back when they switched. But I've spent a LOT of time in all three countries (and still live in one of them today), and the Arabic script has really all but disappeared. It's only used in religious observations, and in some ceremonial and historical circumstances. A minority of the population can make any sense of it. Nobody except for a few religious weirdos uses it for day-to-day communication. I think there's no question that the switch is permanent.

      It helps that the Arabic script was brought to these places by Arabs, so it's not like they were giving up something that was truly their own. Also, of course, the fact that Arabic was largely inaccessible to computers for many years (1970s and onward, slowly fading as a barrier as computers got smarter) was a big blow.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    49. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      What harm is there in not being able to browse a web page in a language you don't understand?

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    50. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      Well, Cyrillic lowercase tends to look more like scaled-down uppercase than the completely different glyphs Latin uses. They'd have to use italic/handwritten lowercase T to get a "m" to render, and I don't think that's actually a separate code point. But I'm just nitpicking, your point still stands.

      A decent solution should start with disallow mixing languages in the TLDs - you can spell a lot less with the Cyrillic characters that look like Latin characters than you can by swapping out or two letters here and there. Plus, if all of the characters in the TLD are unambiguously not in my own alphabet, my browser can throw up a nice little "foreign site - Russian" icon next to it.

    51. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Becausegoogle is the only search that produces relavvant answers for me.

      Once a yearor so I visit all themajor search engines and enter in the exact same phrase. Google is almost always returns the best result in the first 5 answers. yahoo and Bing pull out random results at times. Of course they are built different from google. Google is a search engine first advertising engine second. bing especially is advertising first actual results second. Now don't get me wrong google has the same crappy advertising policies but in the end search results matter most of all.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    52. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by xelah · · Score: 1

      Plus, if all of the characters in the TLD are unambiguously not in my own alphabet, my browser can throw up a nice little "foreign site - Russian" icon next to it.

      Except, of course, it'd have to say 'Cyrillic'. Is it actually possible to distinguish alphabets based on a few Unicode characters?

      More awkwardly....what about a Russian accessing an existing site with a Latin TLD, possibly with other Cyrillic elements?

      Disallowing TLDs that look similar to existing ones is probably a good start, though. Why should there be a Cyrillic .com? Does it mean anything?

    53. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by mirix · · Score: 1

      Well, since .com is for commercial (afaik), the slavicized version of this word is komercijal, which would be .kom in either latin or cyrillic.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    54. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but this is absolutely not insightful (which is bad for kvezach, a little, and tells a lot about moderators here). Not that I'm speaking the undeniable truth, though...

      The world is fragmented. This is the very idea: respecting minorities. The internet, just like newspapers, books etc. should encompass multiculturality.

      > While every keyboard can type A-Za-z

      Isn't that nice in Russia... because everyone must use Roman characters there... or in China... or in Japan... or in Saudi Arabia...

      Actually, some of these countries do use the Roman alphabet, but one wonders how could they manage with typewriters without them for so long...

      The hard-to-face truth is that using our alphabet in these places is awkward. Live with that. Our ways cannot be right everywhere.

      > Sure, the sites can also register an ordinary domain name, but then why not just use that domain name to begin with?

      Symlinks.

      PS: A propos, it's "façade" not "facade". You wrongly say "facade" because your typewriters don't have a "ç".

    55. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      While every keyboard can type A-Za-z,

      Extremely egocentric much?

      An Arabic or Chinese keyboard shouldn’t and doesn’t have to include weird foreign characters, just as you don’t have to be able to type characters that you can’t even read.
      And guess what: Those sites using those weird foreign [A-Za-z] caracters ARE off-limits to many that aren’t “native all-hail glorious America, JAWOHL, SIEG HEIL AMERICA!”

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    56. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone with a Western Keyboard can type A-Z and a-z. Not so with other countries keyboards.

      That's strange because keyboards of various Asian languages that I've seen all have the basic QWERTY style labeling pretty prominent, with other characters on the same keys. I've never seen a keyboard that lacked the basic Latin set.

    57. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      So, if you like Google's service,

      why go to such lengths to prevent remuneration? Search queries cost them real money, you know?

  5. A small step for mankind. by bornroot · · Score: 1

    A evolution of the net, rather than a revolution.

  6. Seriously? by elewton · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it chauvinistic that I find this insane?

    I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...

    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      they didn't break backwards compatability,
      here's the brilliant standard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
      it's just awesome.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think unicode is a bag of shit. If ISO 8859-1 was good enough for Homer, Jesus, & Shakespeare it's good enough for everyone.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Seriously? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      If ISO 8859-1 was good enough for Homer, Jesus, & Shakespeare ...

      It's not good enough for Muhammad and Buddha.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh C'mon! Jesus used the Aramaic alphabet.

      Shakespeare wrote in a "diffyrente waye", with an alphabet that included letters like the "thorne" - a "th" that is frequently mistaken for a "y" - hence our ridiculous "Ye Olde".

      As for Homer Simpson? I don't believe he can write very much at all.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    5. Re:Seriously? by elewton · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much.
      TFA could have mentioned it.

    6. Re:Seriously? by bradleyjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus spoke Aramaic (AFAWK didn't write at all) and his followers recorded his life in Koine Greek. Neither of which can be represented in ISO 8859-1.

    7. Re:Seriously? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is it chauvinistic that I find this insane?
      I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...

      Except there *IS* an escape sequence. And the actual representation is in standard latin alphabets.

      The reason is that browsers can detect the escape sequence and interpret the rest of the URL as a unicode string.

      The escape is "xn--" - domains using it have xn--domain, TLDs as xn--TLD. Use both and they both have to be escaped - xn--blah.xn--blahtld.

      The trick for the Rest of Us is to be able to set that as "off" by default to keep these xn-- sequences from looking like normal latin characters. The good news is the encoding is such that Paypal and the like don't get rendered as xn--paypal.com and such, but xn--junk_that_renders_as_paypal.com.

      Internationalized domain names have been around a few years. This is just an internationalized TLD using the same DNS-friendly encoding scheme.

    8. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer also wrote in Greek. Me thinks you were just trolled.

    9. Re:Seriously? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And that's just king James english.

      Try middle english or even old english.

      Holy crap, it's less understandable than Cyrillic.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Seriously? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Except there *IS* an escape sequence. And the actual representation is in standard latin alphabets.

      Would you ever visit this website if you saw it in an e-mail?
      http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx

      Because I sure as shit wouldn't.
      It looks like a scammer's wet dream.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    11. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh C'mon! Jesus used the Aramaic alphabet.

      Actually, to my knowledge, Jesus never used any alphabet at all. He always let others do his writing for him. As far as we can tell, Jesus was illiterate.

    12. Re:Seriously? by mzs · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that article led me to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDNA

      So I did a dig for xn--bcher-kva.ch

      But that surpised that there was a record, since I thought that DNS insisted that there is never a hyphen following a hyphen. Do you know which RFC changed that?

    13. Re:Seriously? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      No one done the whoosh yet? Ah well, guess it's down to me then.

      Whoosh.

    14. Re:Seriously? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      There's an instance in the Gospel of Luke where Jesus is discussing various things with teachers, and quoting from various old testament sources. Of course it's possible this was all rote memorization, but the simplest solution is that he was educated about them and hence could likely read (and write).

      Of course, that assumes the story is close to accurate, too. But that's another debate.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    15. Re:Seriously? by cababunga · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was trying to be funnier then his parent... I don't know. On the other hand was moded insightful. Ade moderators trying to be funny today too? Or nobody knows that Homer was Greek? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer

    16. Re:Seriously? by Fumus · · Score: 1

      As for Homer Simpson? I don't believe he can write very much at all.

      I would have guessed he referred to the Greek bloke. But that wasn't written in Latin anyway.

    17. Re:Seriously? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      On windows XP SP2...

      Google Chrome 4.1 prerenders it if you COPY and paste into an address bar, but only as a suggestion and not on the bar itself. When the page loads, the address bar remains in ascii goobledygook.
      Minefield 3.7a1 behaves just like Chrome.
      Safari 4.0.4 (greatly ironic version #) renders on the address bar only after it loads the page.
      IE6 does nothing before or after.

    18. Re:Seriously? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's not good enough for Muhammad and Buddha.

      A sun-addled paedophilderist and a lardass slaphead, neither of whom actually exist.

      Prosecution rests, m'lud.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it sure as fuck wasn't written on a computer, you dim cunt.

    20. Re:Seriously? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Try middle english or even old english.

      Holy crap, it's less understandable than Cyrillic.

      Cyrillic is an alphabet. Old and Middle English are languages. Dutch speakers can make sense of Beowulf. Middle English ought to be at least partially comprehensible to an educated native speaker of Insular Low Germanic. Put it another way: I can decipher it, and to me it looks bugger all like Russian or Serbian.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pas du merde, Poirot?

    22. Re:Seriously? by mzs · · Score: 1

      But I think we may just be lucky about the not breaking DNS backwards compatibility part. One of the rules in the two DNS RFCs I know about is that a dash cannot follow another dash in labels used in IN A records. But all these start with xn--, breaking that rule. I ran dig on xn--bcher-kva.ch and I got back an IN A record. Did we just get lucky nothing broke? Can someone point out the RFC that allows '--' in IN A records?

    23. Re:Seriously? by jbgeek · · Score: 1

      But the resultant ASCII compatible domain names are just ... ugly: xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c

      Yikes. Looking at stuff like that in my zone files every day would probably give me a headache. :p

    24. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh C'mon! Jesus used the Aramaic alphabet.

      Shakespeare wrote in a "diffyrente waye", with an alphabet that included letters like the "thorne" - a "th" that is frequently mistaken for a "y" - hence our ridiculous "Ye Olde".

      And they both used WordPerfect version 4 on DOS 3, neither of which supported loonycode.

      As for Homer Simpson? I don't believe he can write very much at all.

      Why are you quoting out of sequence, you moron? Because it's funny? Well it isn't. Ho ho, you made a reference to a cartoon! Hilarious!

  7. Social media IDN fail by ketilf · · Score: 1

    ...and both twitter and bit.ly fail to handle the IDNs correctly. Twitter doesn't make http://-./ a link, and bit.ly just says "Server Error".

    But then again, nobody could have thought this would be easy... I have an email address ending in .name, and 4 character TLDs can even be difficult sometimes.

    1. Re:Social media IDN fail by cpghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an email address ending in .name, and 4 character TLDs can even be difficult sometimes.

      I have and use .info and .name domains too, but have not seen any problems with them (yet). Maybe some programs don't check RFC-822 (or whatever it is called nowadays) addresses as they should, but this is not new.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Social media IDN fail by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I actually built my own url shortening site the other day and the only part I felt was missing as of last night was that it didn't handle international domain names properly (and the language I used to put it together seems sorely lacking in an easy way to convert to punycode, it's got a whole bunch of functions for punycode to utf-8, iso-8859-1 and other charsets but nothing for the opposite).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Social media IDN fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back on dial-up, my email address was something to the effect of foo@bar.baz.com and some sites wouldn't accept it. Such a PITA.

  8. Why not post example by grahamm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why did the BBC article not include a link to a valid non-latin URL so we could see how our browsers cope? Even if the page is not understandable, it would be nice to know that the pages load.

    1. Re:Why not post example by tot · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ICANN blog has a working link.

    2. Re:Why not post example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because they couldn't figure out how to type http:/// in non latin and/or they couldn't decide what site to bring down with a 'slashdot effect'.

    3. Re:Why not post example by chill · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Why not post example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those millions of BBC readers that just want to know that the pages load would take down that poor arabic website.

    5. Re:Why not post example by DaracMarjal · · Score: 1

      The linked ICANN blog suggests http://xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ as an example.

    6. Re:Why not post example by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Wow, the default Droid browser totally barfs on that link. It shows up on the page as a bunch of empty-box characters, and trying to follow it throws the browser a "http:/" link that it ignores completely.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    7. Re:Why not post example by Androclese · · Score: 1

      For those that don't feel like making that extra click, here is what my browser turned that link into: http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx

      Seems to work across FF, IE, and Chrome.

    8. Re:Why not post example by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      If the link shows as empty-box characters on the ICANN page, then your computer doesn't have Arabic support installed for the operating system. That might be what's causing the trouble, rather than Droid.

    9. Re:Why not post example by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      IE6 doesn't seem to support it, but FF3.5.5 does. How disappointing.

    10. Re:Why not post example by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Looks like latin characters too me....

    11. Re:Why not post example by longhairedgnome · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that.

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    12. Re:Why not post example by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Empty box is commonly used as the glyph meaning 'this font doesn't have a character for this glyph'. This means that the browser is correctly parsing the unicode, but the font that you have doesn't have glyphs for arabic characters and your font engine isn't substituting characters from a different font.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Why not post example by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right; Greek, Russian, Chinese, Japanese and Korean TLDs work fine. http://idn.icann.org/ is a good place to test things out, they've got links to many different language TLDs on the left.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    14. Re:Why not post example by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Fails to render the name correctly for me in FF but I'm not surprised. Now only if they would translate the /ar/default.aspx as well... the English legacy is still clearly visible.

    15. Re:Why not post example by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      The link in there doesn't work for me. The webpage just shows up backwards with all kinds of squiggly letters.

    16. Re:Why not post example by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      Firefox 3.6.3 opens the Arabic-charset link just fine but displays that messed up xn-- thing in the location bar. Ditto Chrome. IE6 in a virtual machine (Win7's XP mode) leaves the URL bar in Arabic but doesn't display the page. Opera, in the same VM, works best, as much as I dislike the browser. It opens the site just fine and the URL bar remains in Arabic, though the Arabic address is followed by /ar/default.aspx

    17. Re:Why not post example by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      IE6 doesn't seem to support it, but FF3.5.5 does. How disappointing.

      Is that a TROLL or a JOKE?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    18. Re:Why not post example by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      The new TLDs probably are not yet on the Mozilla's whitelist. Check here how to add the new TLD to the whitelist.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    19. Re:Why not post example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...works fine on my iPhone...

    20. Re:Why not post example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one thing that bothers me here. Can a native non-latin-script-language user ensure what he sees in the URL bar is the intended URL? Are the browsers supposed to show the URL in the non-latin-script? Or is it OK if they show the URL in punycode? The latter looks like line noise sometimes.

    21. Re:Why not post example by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 3GS (English, US) shows the URL in the native character set. However, it will not let me position the cursor in the middle of those characters. I can effectively only edit the Latin part of it. Also, it gives me an additional option to switch to RTL mode. That appears on the usual Select / Select All / Paste menu.

    22. Re:Why not post example by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Not all of the link on the blog seems to be rendering correctly: http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx. I can make out most of it, but what does that "aspx" code at the end mean?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    23. Re:Why not post example by knightsirius · · Score: 1

      Interesting that a language that is read right-to-left has a scrolling ticker that goes left-to-right... http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx

    24. Re:Why not post example by HybridST · · Score: 1

      "Is that a TROLL or a JOKE?"

      Short answer: Yes!

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    25. Re:Why not post example by sasha328 · · Score: 1

      Here you go: http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx

      This is equivalent to http://mcit.gov.eg/ except it directs you to the English webpages instead of the Arabic webpages.
      Notice teh directory structure after the last slash.
      one thing to notice in the TLD above, which is in Arabic, is that the TLD happens to be 3 letters the arabic equivalent of MSR (which is egypt)

      The other TLDs mentioned in the ICANN blog are much longer:
      Egypt: (Egypt)
      Saudi Arabia: (AlSaudiah)
      United Arab Emirates: (Emarat)

      I was wondering why they arrived at this decision and then I read this document: http://arabic-domains.org/docs/NIC-docs/SupportingArabicDomainNmaes.pdf which seems to explain the logic behind the choice.
      It is still a lot to type though, so if i have the choice, I'll use latin domain names.

    26. Re:Why not post example by mobets · · Score: 1

      According to their screen shot, iPhone does. Sadly, my Droid doesn't.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    27. Re:Why not post example by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      It was something I tested in IE6 and FF3.5.5.

    28. Re:Why not post example by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      This is equivalent to http://mcit.gov.eg/ except it directs you to the English webpages instead of the Arabic webpages.

      No, I got the Arabic pages. I'm in Israel, with my browser set as:
      Accept-Charset: windows-1255,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
      Accept-Language: en

      You can use this website to check how your browser is configured:
      http://simplesniff.com/

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    29. Re:Why not post example by sznupi · · Score: 1

      That /ar/default.aspx part, judging by the rest of links on the site, seems to be just just how the code running on their server operates (for now?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  9. Slashdot IDN fail by ketilf · · Score: 1

    Haha, way to go Slashdot! So I have to input http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ instead of http://-./ ?

    (Not that anyone will see what I originally meant)

  10. Fragmenting and such... by Unka+Willbur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date. I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

    --
    "Remember when I said I would never lie? Well, that was the first time."
    1. Re:Fragmenting and such... by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Part of me says you're right ... the other parts says "Why does it bother you?". (Unless you want to be a sysadmin in China.)

    2. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      English? WTF? LOL!

    3. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When the 7 Billion people around the globe will be speaking Standard English, then you may have a point. Until then I think it is everybody's right to use his/her native/preferred language on the Internet, including in TLDs. I speak 5 languages and Arabic is my native language and I think that today is a great day for the Internet.

    4. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the internet is a nation with its own language

      Yeah, but it's not English, it's TCP/IP. And DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet, but rather a layer on top, used mostly for the WWW part. Many peer-to-peer applications would work just fine even if DNS was never created.

    5. Re:Fragmenting and such... by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      I see some problems cropping up in the future.

      Imagine a domain like BankOfAmerica.com - only one of the letters is non latin, yet simmilar looking. Links look OK, address bar looks OK.

      Just say'n - there's going to be bad guys exploiting this.

    6. Re:Fragmenting and such... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is.

      Well, then as the submitter, I regret tagging it with "culture."

      I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

      Huh, as a developer I had always assumed that we wrote software to help people. Not that people changed their behaviors and customs to be able to use our software. I guess I was wrong. I find it disturbing that a polyglot like yourself can so easily dismiss an engineering challenge as "ridiculous" and "shenanigans" because all it takes to get around it is for everyone in the world to learn my language of takes.

      I find it humorous that we sit here and rail for interoperability and satisfying the consumer and no DRM and open standards ... only to turn around and call something that opens up the internet to the rest of the world "ridiculous."

      If this is the consensus among geeks, what a shame it is to be a geek.

      Where do you stand on the effort that went into the Linux language packs? Were those ridiculous tribalism as well when someone took the time to make them?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    7. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonna post this a A.C. because it's so obviously not groupthink and will surely be rated "Troll."

      I am fine with the fragmentation. That fragmentation could go far to keeping these backwards thinking religious factions in places like Iran and Pakistan from further infiltrating our everyday life by forcing us to put up with their backwards all-or-nothing morality.

      As a matter of fact, I am all for building a great big plastic dome over the middle east so that they can keep to themselves until they grow the fuck up. While we're at it we can put OUR fundamentalists there too in Jerusalem.

    8. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, support for local languages is good.

      However, the way it's being added is technically bad.

    9. Re:Fragmenting and such... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see a character translation method. I should be able to type CNN in my native language and, once put into a URL bar, it will translate it to cnn.com and move forward. There are plenty of URLs in different languages, but as far as I know they're all the latin characters (abcdef, etc).

    10. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the current standard for URLs lack characters which can be easily mistaken for other characters (outside of O/0) and we get domain-based phishing anyway. This has come up more than once that once address bars start treating these characters "correctly" you may realize you've just navigated to what would be punycode encoded as (obviously a garbage string for example's sake) http://xn-2oga-aiaw-va-na-neva-.com instead of http://yourbank.com or you may miss it and be phish food. This has been batted about for a while now and it will cause problems in the future.

    11. Re:Fragmenting and such... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      stultorum calami carbones moenia chartae

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    12. Re:Fragmenting and such... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English

      So by your logic, no-one should be allowed to write emails, or post to forums, or compose web pages in anything other than English?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Fragmenting and such... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      as a developer I had always assumed that we wrote software to help people

      YMBNH

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would it not show up as xn--gibberish.com ? The example link in the ICANN blog shows up as http://xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/

    15. Re:Fragmenting and such... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Actually the vast majority of P2P applications use the DNS system to bootstrap into the network.

      DNS is absolutely vital to the functioning of the Internet as it exists today.

    16. Re:Fragmenting and such... by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

      CAN I HAS LOLCATS?

      --
      Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
    17. Re:Fragmenting and such... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0, Troll

      They're waiting for him on the Internet. Why do you think he's on Slashdot?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Fragmenting and such... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet, but rather a layer on top, used mostly for the WWW part

      Ouch. I think you'll find it pretty hard to list widespread protocols that don't use DNS. Even BitTorrent usually uses it to find the tracker. SMTP, NNTP, XMPP, IMAP, POP, and so on all use DNS. Sure, you can run all of these protocols without DNS, but only if you like memorising 32-bit numbers (or 128-bit numbers if you want to use IPv6) and your servers never move network. I just moved a load of services from a machine in the USA to one in the UK and everything kept working because I updated the DNS to point to the new machine. I'd hate to have had to manually update /etc/hosts files for everyone who used them, or explicit references to the IP addresses.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:Fragmenting and such... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is.

      Easy for you to say - you who happens to be a member of the native tribe. What do we say to all those (i.e., the majority of the entire human race) that aren't speakers of Standard English. Are they to be denied access to the internet? Because they can't spell "Google" using whatever appears on their local keyboard?

      It's not like the internet doesn't already have significant fragmentation. There are whole swaths of the internet - the largest growing portion, in fact - that are conducted in languages other than English. (interesting piece on that here.) Do you think all those websites in China are using Standard English in their page content? Allowing non-latin characters in TLDs just brings website addresses up to the same level as the rest of the internet.

      Besides, it's not like, if you happen to be a speaker of Arabic, you won't be able to reach those Arabic-TLD websites. How hard would it be to find what you are looking for using an arabic-domain search engine? Or to type in the arabic equivalent of "www.somedomain.co.eg"?

    20. Re:Fragmenting and such... by rickbliss · · Score: 1

      NPR's story would seem to disagree that the INTERNET speaks only standard English. http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2010/04/30/126420060/bridging-the-online-language-barrier-translating-the-internet

    21. Re:Fragmenting and such... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a UI problem, and it's pretty easy to fix. Simply display punycode URLs in a different colour, such as red. Some browsers do this already. Punycode isn't new; it's been supported for second-level domains for a long time. The only new thing here is that some ccTLDs are now using Punycode for the top-level part as well as the subdomains.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:Fragmenting and such... by jhol13 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Go fuck yourself and keep your elitist views outta here ja se on sama ruottiksi.

    23. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who've perverted and twisted their religion to serve their own immoral desires.

      Hey! Leave the Catholics out of this!

    24. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Malc · · Score: 1

      How ironic that you would make an accusation of tribalism.

      Good for you for speaking eight languages, but that doesn't add any authority to your ridiculous statement. Just why would you expect everybody to use English? Move on, you're irrelevant.

    25. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Motard · · Score: 1

      Stercus accidit

    26. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, I am all for building a great big plastic dome over the middle east so that they can keep to themselves until they grow the fuck up.

      Three guys, a Canadian, a sand nigger and a KKK member are out walking one day. They come across a lantern and a Genie pops out of it. "I will give each of you one wish, that's three wishes total," says the Genie. The Canadian says, "I am a farmer, my dad was a farmer, and my son will also farm. I want the land to be forever fertile in Canada." With a blink of the Genie's eye, 'POOF' the land in Canada was forever made fertile for farming.

      The sand nigger was amazed, so he said, "I want a wall around Afghanistan, so that no infidels, Jews or Americans can come into our precious state." Again, with a blink of the Genie's eye, 'POOF' there was a huge wall around Afghanistan.

      The KKK member, asks, "I'm very curious. Please tell me more about this wall." The Genie explains, "Well, it's about 15,000 feet high, 500 feet thick and completely surrounds the country; nothing can get in or out -- virtually impenetrable."

      The KKK member says, "Fill it with water."

    27. Re:Fragmenting and such... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Configuration detail. They can just as easily be pointed at 172.17.58.219.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    28. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it that you've never seen how a computer noob gets owned by phishers before?

      Well this is gonna be even worse as the entire phishing industry just got a license to print money.

      Not to mention all kinds of interoperability issues with all sorts of software that nobody has the code to.

      PS. I speak 3 languages. English in my third language. So I don't have any bias towards it. But I think ITLDs are a very, very bad idea.

    29. Re:Fragmenting and such... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see a character translation method. I should be able to type CNN in my native language and, once put into a URL bar, it will translate it to cnn.com and move forward.

      That makes no sense. Other languages aren't just substitution ciphers. A string in non-Latin language X will be ambiguously correspondent to multiple Latin sites in some cases.

      There are plenty of URLs in different languages, but as far as I know they're all the latin characters (abcdef, etc).

      You are wrong. Non-Latin URLs have been available for many years. The only difference today is that the final part of the domain name can finally be non-latin too. Everything else (except for "http") could have been - and often was - non-Latin for a long time.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    30. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, while we're at it, why don't we start using roman numerals for IP addresses.

      It's all binary underneath anyways.

      Sure, the Internet will go on. But for most people WWW is Internet. And DNS is an integral part of the WWW part.

    31. Re:Fragmenting and such... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      And DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet

      Really? You seriously believe that? DNS is the single most important element of the Internet, and is the part that allows the rest to work.

      Email: can't send email to someone not on your local machine without doing a name lookup on their mail exchanger.
      Web: when was the last time you entered an IP address to go to a site? And without naming, virtual hosts just wouldn't work (unless you used a different port each time, which would become tedious)
      NNTP: how do you think news servers know how to contact other servers to share posts?
      VoIP: how do you think your client knows how to contact its server?
      P2P: ever really looked at a torrent file? It goes back to a server to get a list of peers. Guess how those servers are found?

      Without DNS, the Internet as we know it simply wouldn't exist and would not be nearly as popular.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    32. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Email, Web, NNTP: not P2P.

      VOIP: the ones connected to the phone lines are not P2P.

      So let's take torrents as an example. All you need is one Web site (so one IP address) that publishes tracker IPs. Then your clever torrent client can get participants' IPs from the tracker.

      I am not saying that DNS is not being used: I am not stupid. My claim is that the Internet would remain a very vibrant place even if DNS crashed and burned tomorrow, after some necessary adjustments.

    33. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      DNS is not an element of the Internet, it's a service that runs on top of the Internet. You can argue that it is foundational for the Web, and I will agree with you.

    34. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      You are right in that DNS removes a lot of friction for a multitude of other higher-level services, but I still don't see how the Internet depends on it in any way.

    35. Re:Fragmenting and such... by jmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date.

      Maybe if DNS addresses were based on Chinese, Hindi or Arabic then you'd have a different opinion.

  11. Summary by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    So now we have mention of a new website. Slashdot cites its shortcomings as unable to display a link to the site and the article has no link.

    You can find a link by following here:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  12. This is just like .xxx by drumcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

    1. Re:This is just like .xxx by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

      No, the sharia will be that all internet usage must be in Arabic since that is the only language the Koran can be in (if it isn't in Arabic, it isn't the Koran according to Muslims).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:This is just like .xxx by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that if Sharia specified a language to be used, I'm pretty sure it would be Arabic, smart guy.

    3. Re:This is just like .xxx by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      GP was probably proud of himself for having heard of a language other than caveman grunting.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:This is just like .xxx by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      How is it different with the current .com, .cn, .se, .fr, etc domains? It is just another country-specific TLD.

    5. Re:This is just like .xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the sharia will be that all internet usage must be in Arabic since that is the only language the Koran can be in (if it isn't in Arabic, it isn't the Koran according to Muslims).

      So why has the Koran been translated into so many different languages - including most that support latin?

    6. Re:This is just like .xxx by Ipeunipig · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is not a Sharia law about rocking the casbah, though I've heard they don't like it.

    7. Re:This is just like .xxx by corbettw · · Score: 1

      No, the sharia will be that all internet usage must be in Arabic since that is the only language the Koran can be in (if it isn't in Arabic, it isn't the Koran according to Muslims).

      Ah man, now I have to get new toilet paper!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  13. A great victory by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the inhabitants of Mönsterås, Sweden.
    The town name means 'patterned ridge', but to date they've have had to put up with the domain "Monsteras" - which means "monster-carcass".
    (å, ä, ö/ø in the Scandinavian languages are considered to be their own unique characters, not accented 'a's and 'o's.)

    1. Re:A great victory by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a hostname (which is already supported via IDN, such as http://xn--malmpeeps-37a.se/ ), this story is talking about TLDs.

      There's no technical reason Mönsterås can't have mönsterås.se

    2. Re:A great victory by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Å, ä and ö have been usable in .se domain names for quite some time actually, it's just that support for it in various development tools is absolutely pathetic (unless you want to change your language and library choice solely based on which one has support for that specific feature).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:A great victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The town name means 'patterned ridge', but to date they've have had to put up with the domain "Monsteras" - which means "monster-carcass"."

      Soooooo, let me get this straight. They want to go from a cool name like Monsteras (Really? They have monster carcasses? Cool!) to a boring one like Mönsterås ("Patterned ridge"? Boring to anyone not a geomorphologist).

      Don't blame me if their tourism rates drop. Well, ok, except for an influx of geomorphologists.

    4. Re:A great victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Swedish have common substitutions for those vowels? In German, one can represent ö as oe (so, schön ~ schoen).

      Just curious.

    5. Re:A great victory by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sweet! Now I can finally get my site, "anosfeliz.es" off blacklists! ;-)

      (For the non-Spanish speakers out there: "feliz" means happy (and adjectives come after nouns, like Rio Grande [big river] or El Camino Real [the royal road]), "años" means "years" and "anos" means "anus." So instead of "happy years" it would be... something else entirely.)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:A great victory by Novus · · Score: 1

      Å, Ä and Ö are considered letters in their own right in Swedish, and should not be exchanged for anything else. That said, there are two approaches used when these letters cannot be used:

      • Drop the diacritics and use A, A and O. This is especially amusing in the case of the municipality of Hörby.
      • Use German/Danish/Norwegian-style substitution: Ö to OE, Ä to AE (similar to Danish/Norwegian Æ, the equivalent letter) and Å to AA (old-school spelling, only recently changed in Danish).
    7. Re:A great victory by sznupi · · Score: 1

      So...what's especially amusing with Hörby? :)

      (does it work, locally, "type A & E quickly to get Æ"? ;) )

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  14. you're not thinking the issue through by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    currently people are not getting on the internet because its all in english: it serves as a barrier and they see no reason to even try

    but when the internet supports their native language, they get on the internet, get a taste of it, like it, want to use more it, and inevitably this drives them to the english web, since there's more of whatever they're looking for over there

    in other words, the long term effect of supporting other languages on the web is paradoxically further and faster consolidation to english

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by lehphyro · · Score: 1

      inevitably this drives them to the english web, since there's more of whatever they're looking for over there

      I doubt it. I big part of the english internet is USA-centric, they dont give a shit about it.

    2. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This barrier will disappear when translation tools (ie: google translate) get good enough.
      Then anyone can just activate "auto-translate" (chrome has already started going down that road), and browse the whole internet in their native language, and not be restricted to only content that has been translated.

    3. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily.

      Since sometime back in the '90s the web site www.ilse.nl was founded: a search engine that would index Dutch language sites only. Very useful for those that speak Dutch. Luckily for us Dutch we don't need a different character set, we can get along with the limits of Latin just fine. When it came to searching for Dutch language sites it was the number one choice. And so there are a few more, www.startpagina.nl is another very popular one.

      Wikipedia comes in lots of languages - but I have never heard anyone here shout "fragmentation! Less freedom!" about that. Even though most of those other languages are inaccessible to them. But then English is inaccessible for a large part of the world, and the vast majority of people still prefers to use their native language. And that preference continues online. Even though they may be proficient in English.

      I can actually imagine that the English language in the long term becomes a minority language. After all there are more native Chinese speakers than native English speakers in this world. There are probably even more non-English speakers than that there are English speakers, and in this case not even talking about native English speakers.

    4. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by the_womble · · Score: 1

      English also has a lot of secondary speakers, is spoken in many different countries, and has huge numbers of people learning it, and is spoken in more different countries than any other language, making it the most useful language for communicating internationally.

      Some useful facts here

      You are right about the invalidity of the fragmentation argument.

    5. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people are already avoiding the internet out of fear of English, I don't think adding less-common languages will really get them learning English. I mean, you're either open to the idea of picking up bits of another language, or you're not.

      And from a more general point of view, fragmentation of content into more languages makes this effect larger. Someone who didn't want to learn something as easily accessible as English (fairly easy to get a basic working knowledge of, and yields access to lots of content) probably isn't going to want to learn another language that is either more difficult or offers less internet content.

    6. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia comes in lots of languages - but I have never heard anyone here shout "fragmentation! Less freedom!" about that. Even though most of those other languages are inaccessible to them. But then English is inaccessible for a large part of the world, and the vast majority of people still prefers to use their native language.

      Yesterday it was relatively trivial to identify the originating country by the country code TLD in the URL. Now, there is no standard to use for a country code. This is called fragmentation.

  15. Re:To all of you selfish westerners complaining... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I'm a Westerner, but I think this is pretty cool. Is it particularly useful for me? No, not really. Besides a semesters worth of Japanese in college, I studied Spanish and Latin, both in high school and in college. Amazingly, both use the Latin alphabet. I've dabbled in some Italian and German as well, but I can type the majority of those characters on my keyboard, too, or with character combinations to get at the unicode. However, if this enables further localization for geo-location specific sites and content for those to whom its relevant, then its a pretty big step forward. Most foreign sites which need to be easily accessible to westerners will still probably maintain a Romanized domain name which points to their English/Spanish/German content, while leaving their native language content accessible via the native language hostname, thus making it so that everyone is comfortable getting at information without having to switch brain modes. American and Europeans doing business with Asian and Middle Eastern customers will probably do the same, providing access via native-language domain names for their major markets. Is it extra work? Yes, but in the long run its going to be worth it, and it may provide an excuse for people to learn an Asian or Semitic language, or even an Indo-Aryan language like Russian or Greek which uses non-Roman letters. People should do that anyway, though.

  16. Language packs? by PPH · · Score: 1

    My browser has had support for Mojibake encoding for years.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Good first step! by fortapocalypse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now to axe the latin protocol prefix, colon, slashes and dots. Also, what about those with disabilities- it is visual after all. We need "thought domains"- but wait, what about those with impaired mental capacities? Domains by intuitition would work. But what about parallel universes! Argh.

    1. Re:Good first step! by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when does a user have to type the http:/// in a browser bar?

    2. Re:Good first step! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more protocols than http.

    3. Re:Good first step! by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      what about those with impaired mental capacities?

      Already solved, we gave them jobs at ICANN!

    4. Re:Good first step! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in IE when specifying the port.
      Try "slashdot.org:80" in IE's address bar.

  18. Ummm... by Pteraspidomorphi · · Score: 1

    The introduction of the first web names using so-called country code top-level domains (CCTLDs) is the culmination of several years of work by the organisation.

    Could have sworn they've been available for quite a while...

  19. security implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the security implications. I understand that certan characters appear more than once in differeing character sets. As in 'A' could be represented by 65, 72 etc. That means that Asite.com could be registered multiple times.

  20. So what's the RFC for similar characters by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Preventing similar characters from being used to make one domain look like another.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:So what's the RFC for similar characters by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Preventing similar characters from being used to make one domain look like another.

      There wasn't one before (remember paypai.com?) there isn't one now.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  21. Unpredictable browser behavior? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Isn't that a possible hacking vector?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  22. Where can you register? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So where can I register a domain name in Arabic? What Arabic TLDs are available? I'm Canadian, can I register?

    1. Re:Where can you register? by vbraga · · Score: 0, Troll

      For Saudi Arabia SaudiNIC is the place to go. But I believe you need some kind of local ID to register a domain.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    2. Re:Where can you register? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

  23. Much P2P depends on WWW for discovery by tepples · · Score: 1

    DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet, but rather a layer on top, used mostly for the WWW part. Many peer-to-peer applications would work just fine even if DNS was never created.

    Except a lot of peer-to-peer applications depend on WWW for discovery. You still need DNS to download the client or a recent list of well-known hosts.

  24. Shukran! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    So when is /. going to allow none Latin characters? I cannot even say ! What gives?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  25. ever hear of facebook? twitter? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i'm not at all implying that other people care about USA-centric crap, but i'm saying they most definitely are interested in tech that often starts in the usa

    there's also the network effect

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

    more people using a given website simply makes it more compelling, because how many people are in a given social website often defines how useful that site actually is. this renders languages other than english at an automatic, and continuing, disadvantage

    even internet tech that started outside the usa, if it gained an international following, say the chan message boards from japan (4chan), icq in israel, or chatroulette in russia, they all migrated to the english web as an inevitable aspect of becoming an international success, and even though they of course have multilanguage abilities and continue to be used in multilanguage ways, their english manifestations are their largest elements

    then there is the bizarre phenomenon of paleolithic tech that gets born in the usa, and mostly forgotten there, but continues to live on in other areas

    google's orkut started in the usa, but faded, but is huge in brazil, and also india. google relocated orkut from california to belo horizonte

    remember friendster? its still alive and well in malaysia, philippines, indonesia. a malaysian company in fact recently purchased friendster

    all i'm saying is we're talking about technology, not culture, and no one believes that being usa-centric is the point or even an aspect of being rooted in the english language

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ever hear of facebook? twitter? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      friendster? its still alive and well in malaysia, philippines, indonesia. a malaysian company in fact recently purchased friendster

      It turns out that I live almost next door to that company's HQ (MOL) but I'd never heard of it until looking up the Friendster purchase after reading your post. Based on Vincent Tan's other tech projects I think it's safe to say Friendster will be dead within 2 years.

      Malaysians use Facebook. They may use Friendster more than other people use Friendster, but they use Facebook more than they use Friendster.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:ever hear of facebook? twitter? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      then there is the bizarre phenomenon of paleolithic tech that gets born in the usa, and mostly forgotten there, but continues to live on in other areas

      Like our original non-validating, unicode-incompatible slashcode board? ;)
      *ducks at thrown shoes*

    3. Re:ever hear of facebook? twitter? by lehphyro · · Score: 1

      i'm saying they most definitely are interested in tech that often starts in the usa

      We see more use of USA tech because most western innovation happens there.

      this renders languages other than english at an automatic, and continuing, disadvantage

      They have to have an english version because english is the universal language. But the majority of non-english speaking people will only use facebook for example if it's translated to their language. The native language of the developers doesnt matter.

      their english manifestations are their largest elements

      Citation needed. With more than a half of the people in the world using non-latin languages, it's hard to believe.

  26. Safari and Firefox work by ral · · Score: 2, Informative

    The site in the ICANN blog worked for me in both Safari and Firefox, in the Windows XP and OSX versions of both. Both Safari and Firefox showed Arabic in the text on the tab, but only Safari showed Arabic in the address bar.

    1. Re:Safari and Firefox work by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Chrome shows punycode in the address bar as well. It's actually a security issue (probably a setting to enable it somewhere) when punycode started being used within .com domains, people were registering things like paypal.com except with Greek or Cyrillic letters and rather than trying to explain to users that they've linked to a greek domain and if they don't think the website should be in greek it's probably fake, they just decided to show the punycode URL

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Safari and Firefox work by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Text on the tab is the HTML title element. It has nothing to do with the non-Latin TLD.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  27. DNS is advertisement by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It's purpose is to advertise your service. Even 4 billion is a large search space for humans.

    It all started with host files. non scalable updating and distributing a flat file with all the people who wanted to run services and to allow other people to use them easily (name vs address) so DNS was invented to allow people to advertise their serv(ers|ices) all by themselves.

    If people want to create their own little unusable fiefdoms. Go right ahead.
     

    --
    Deleted
  28. chrome linux by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Chrome 5.0.375.29 beta for Linux mutates it into the xn-- form you mention.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  29. URLs will look exactly like this by bamakhrama · · Score: 1

    Support for Unicode URLs is already available in Google Chrome (5.0.375.29 beta). The Arabic URL is: http:///.-. Chrome will display it on my Ubuntu 10.04 machine as: http:///.-./ar/default.aspx However, in Mozilla Firefox 3.6.3, the URL will be shown as: http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx I have a standard Ubuntu 10.04 installation (no extra language packs or whatever).

    1. Re:URLs will look exactly like this by bamakhrama · · Score: 1

      Sorry guys but it seems that Slashdot does not recognize Unicode yet! :-(

    2. Re:URLs will look exactly like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you didn't read the article summary.

      It clearly states Slashdot doesn't recognize it:

      "Slashdot does not support them but you can find the TLDs in the BBC article."

    3. Re:URLs will look exactly like this by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      Mozilla for security reasons has a blacklist of characters and whitelist of TLD for the IDN support. The new TLDs are not on the whitelist thus Fx shows the raw punycode instead.

      Check here how to allow the TLD ".xn--wgbh1c" to use IDN.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  30. As If IP based content was not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I go to Google and many other websites I get Crap in my local language. Getting decent international news from Google became difficult; everything is right to left :( Some websites will make it difficult to switch to English like Skype. Now I have to figure out how to type these odd named websites which probably include official government websites. The next thing is that websites as Google will start serving me those non-Latin links. Living in a crappy third world country is not enough for them, they have to make acquiring information more difficult and who knows may be next they will have a firewall that will filter all infidel latin based URLs.

  31. translation tools will never work by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i've tried that chrome auto-translate, and it kind of sort of works, and will always just kind of sort of work. language is inextricably human, and no computer will ever be able to understand every nuance of meaning to translate well, never mind perfectly

    the only good translator is a human translator, and even they screw up or are fundamentally unable to translate every nuance of meaning. we are all human, so we will always understand each other when it comes to basic motivations and such, but when it comes to various nuances of culture and meaning, different people in different languages are to some small extent permanently incomprehensible to each other

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  32. Where to go to register a domain? by longhairedgnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where can I go to register a site in squibbly? ÷ :]

    --
    GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  33. Slashdot does not support them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot does not support them

    Welcome to the twentieth century!

  34. How it works by jroysdon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As I maintain my own DNS servers and such, I was curious how this worked. Here's what I learned with 15 minutes of research:

    My first stop was to see the root.zone and I looked for these new TLDs, curious to see how they would show up in a Latin-based zone file. Ah, I spotted these odd XN-- zones and then knew what to dig into more.

    Take for instance (I pasted a Unicode domain, but Slashcode won't show it) which is handled by ns[1-3].dotmasr.eg.:

    $ dig ns (Unicode domain)

    ; > DiG 9.6.2-P1-RedHat-9.6.2-3.P1.fc12 > ns (Unicode domain) ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;.(Unicode domain) IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    . 3600(Unicode domain) IN NS ns1.dotmasr.eg.
    . 3600 (Unicode domain)IN NS ns2.dotmasr.eg.
    . 3600(Unicode domain) IN NS ns3.dotmasr.eg.

    If you look in the root.zone file, you will see that the ASCII/Latin version of this zone is really XN--WGBH1C.:
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS1.DOTMASR.EG.
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS2.DOTMASR.EG.
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS3.DOTMASR.EG.

    TLD Reserved Domains has a list of the current mappings. ToASCII and ToUnicode are the methods to convert back and forth which links to RFC 3490 which has the nitty gritty details.

    (meh, Slashcode doesn't support Unicode encoding, but I can see the Unicode domain name I am pasting in before I hit Preview in Firefox)

    Also, the whole switching from right to left in Latin characters to left to right in some Unicode is odd when trying to edit!

    1. Re:How it works by value_added · · Score: 1

      As I maintain my own DNS servers and such, I was curious how this worked. Here's what I learned ...

      For real fun, slave the root, arpa, etc. zones. As a ferinstance:

      zone "." {
                      type slave;
                      file "slave/root.slave";
                      masters {
                                      192.5.5.241; // F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
                      };
      };

      zone "arpa" {
                      type slave;
                      file "slave/arpa.slave";
                      masters {
                                      192.5.5.241; // F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
                      };
      };
      zone "in-addr.arpa" {
                      type slave;
                      file "slave/in-addr.arpa.slave";
                      masters {
                                      192.5.5.241; // F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
                      };
      }

  35. URL by Domini · · Score: 1

    This is?

    Got to: http://idnblog.com/2010/05/05/idn-history-today-idn-cctlds/

    prepend: "http://"

    to the text following : "Here is one newly enabled domain with a functional website that works right now:"

    I would post it here, but /. does not support these non-latin. (big surprise)

  36. you do see the irony by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of posting what you just wrote in english, on a usa-started and hosted website

    as a dutchman though, you are very much within the western world, which is even more english dominated than the wider world, and your perfect english is an example of that

    but as i a sit here in midtown manhattan staring out at brooklyn (from breukelen in utrecht), read about the yankees baseball team (from jon quesa: "johnny cheese", how the dutch derisively referred to the english dairy farmers), and contemplate all the kills in the area (creeks), and all the roosevelts in our presidencies, i know that linguistic and cultural influence is a very relative thing indeed

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you do see the irony by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      LOL and thanks about my English.

      Yes languages are wonderful things and influence each other all the time.

      But the word "kill" for creek, I don't think that has a Dutch origin. It just doesn't sound like it.

    2. Re:you do see the irony by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      spackenkill fresh kills kill van kull fishkill stony kill...

      there are hundreds of such place names from harlem(!) to albany (ex-fort orange)

      whatever the real derivation, us americans believe this to be a dutch convention, so don't deny us our mythology ;-)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. Can't wait for this by slack_prad · · Score: 1

    For this to apply to all the Indian languages. Each state with its own language and script .. it's going to be mass confusion. Just like life in India, it would fit right in.

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
  38. Another level of the Tower of Babel is constructed by 2centplain · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, all keyboards around the world can type ASCII characters. (Does "A" really mean "American" any more? It's the base character set for all things computer-ish.)

  39. Re:To all of you selfish westerners complaining... by edbob · · Score: 1

    I, too, am a Westerner. I have spurs on my boots, ten-gallon hat, bolo tie, and horns on my Cadillac.

  40. why would I implement language packs by swschrad · · Score: 1

    for languages that I cannot even pronounce, let alone read or write? that is krep I can dump immediately to save disk space and memory.

    I can fake my way enough in english, french, german, and spanish to get along, thanks.

    no, I'm not guessing which is supposed to be my native language, thanks. if nobody else can figure it out, why should I try? :-D

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:why would I implement language packs by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      for languages that I cannot even pronounce, let alone read or write? [...] I can fake my way enough in english, french, german, and spanish to get along, thanks.

      Don't be shy, aboot it, chap. "Canadian English" is a fine first language, eh? ;)

  41. Re:To all of you selfish westerners complaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the long run its going to be worth it, and it may provide an excuse for people to learn an Asian or Semitic language

    And that's such a good thing because...? Why can't they replace their alphabet with the latin one, like in Turkish?

  42. *YOUR* idea of the internet you mean by aepervius · · Score: 1

    While i agree on the form with you, let us not forget that a lot of people neither read english, nor even know the roman alphabet, and only read their own language. Effectively you are telling those people "sucks to be you, now get off my lawn" Those domain name in their own language are VERY attractive to the majority of those which only know their own language. I know people which only visits chinese, japanese, germanic , or french domain. For the chinese/japanese one they would probably appreciate not having even to use roman char set *AT ALL*. And if a web site is in farsi or chinese, chance is that if you do not speak the language *you are notn interrested in the content to begin with*. Filtering and censoring is only a side effect, and a minor one. Filtering could as well be adddressed by the dictatorship governement by mandating the web site to be ONLY with a .egypt (roman) domain name or whatever. ".egypt" being in (farsi) does not really make it better or worst for censoring.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  43. Been done for a longtime by DrYak · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been dome for a long time (spelling paypal with similarily looking cyrillic characters. i.e.: "raura" but in cyrillic. or "eVau" for "eBay").
    Most browsers circumvent it by either displaying the escaped characters (a.k.a. Punny Code) or by using a different colour to tag non-lating characters (don't know which browser uses this technique).

    The current difference now, is that the top-level domain, too could be done in non-latin caracters.

    i.e.: up until now, the hacks only spellt "PayPal" with seemilarily-looking cyrillics. starting from today a new TLD could be created which looks like "com" but is instead cyrillcs ( "som" in this instance )

    Browsers will simply react by showing the escaped form or flag the letters with a different colour.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  44. Flagfox addon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite what you are looking for but addresses a similar issue that has a broad domain overlap with the one at hand.

  45. Bullshit. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native".

    Bullshit. My conservative estimate is that every major version of Windows, OS X and Linux over the past 7 years supports input methods for Arabic and Chinese, using an ordinary Latin keyboard. Also, you can buy Arabic keyboards if you like, or even just Arabic character stickers for your existing keyboard. And of course, there's also the fact that you can reach Arabic or Chinese-content sites from links or search engines, or the fact that you can copy and paste a foreign script URL on your browser bar.

    Can you read any Arabic or Chinese, anyway?

  46. Re:Another level of the Tower of Babel is construc by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, all keyboards around the world can type ASCII characters.

    And as far as I know, all major desktop operating systems have input method support that allows you to use a Latin keyboard to input any script in common use. If you don't know how to use it, well, that's your problem.

  47. i have a lot of filipino friends by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    a few years ago, they all used friendster

    sometime in the recent past (12 mos?) i noticed they were all on facebook now

    yes, exactly as you say, its a dying distinction

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  48. Rebirth by OMA1981 · · Score: 1
    --
    The less you talk, the more people hear you say.
  49. E-mail support? by orudge · · Score: 1

    So, most browsers support IDNs these days, but what about e-mail clients? In theory, it shouldn't be an issue for SMTP servers when translated into the ASCII form, but are there any e-mail clients that actually support IDNs? How about web-based e-mail services? I can foresee issues with people trying to e-mail these new domains.

  50. bnak of amercia by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    all that trouble with the fake 'e' come to a crashing halt as the hacker appears to be dyslexic.

  51. Hey, look, it's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they somehow patent their method of client exploitation, because if not they risk most choosing to be robbed by phishing sites -- they might do less damage than the real thing.

    Come to think, this maybe THE main idea behind patents: preventing a better product/idea from coming up.

  52. Shuting them down? by kentsin · · Score: 0

    They might think it is a victory to their home culture.

    Why can t they think in opposite? They should have feel that they have occupied Europe and acquire all alphabets into their language as result.

    Expand, not shutdown!

    It is wrong to shink the internet, hiding to think you are getting some respect. It is just opposite

  53. What? I thought Firefox supported IDN's? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    To those Firefox users wondering why the http://xn--4gbrim.xn----rmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--wgbh1c/ar/default.aspx link in TFA didn't display non-ASCII characters in the address bar...

    Yes, Firefox supports International Domain Names, but there's a bunch of Whitelist Preferences in about:config that control which TLD's will work. The .xn--wgbh1c isn't in there, so you need to make sure you have the following preferences:

    1. Check existing preference" network.enableIDN : boolean = true
    2. Check existing preference" network.IDN_show_punycode : boolean = false
    3. Create new preference: network.IDN.whitelist.xn--wgbh1c : boolean = true

    Extra hint: Changing the preference will not affect currently-open tabs and windows.

  54. Bummer by bbhack · · Score: 1

    It must be a burden to be part of a formerly great civilization whose language and alphabet cannot be expressed on the internet.

    Then again, maybe not.

    --
    The next thing to remember is to put next things next.