Slashdot Mirror


Call In the Military To Blast Rogue Satellite?

coondoggie submitted a follow-up to the tale of the wandering satellite that might collide with other stuff in orbit. He asks "Will the military need to be called in to blow up the rogue Intelsat satellite meandering through Earth's orbit? Or maybe a NASA Space Shuttle could swing by and grab it? You may recall that in 2008, rather than risk that a large piece of a failing spy satellite would fall on populated areas, the government blasted it out of the sky. The physics of such a shot were complicated and the Navy had a less than 10-second window to hit the satellite as it passed over its ships in the Pacific Ocean. But it worked. Now word comes that a five-year-old Intelsat TV satellite is meandering in orbit and attempts to control it have proven futile. At issue now is that the satellite could smash into other satellites or ramble into other satellite orbits and abscond with their signals."

15 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. U.S. Air Force to the rescue! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I guess now at least we know what the launch of that secretive X-37B Air Force shuttle was for. So we should be safe, assuming that a PS3 update doesn't screw up its aiming system.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:U.S. Air Force to the rescue! by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The satellite is Luxembourg-owned, which has an army of 600 soldiers, 2 cannons and no plane, so I don't see that happening.

    2. Re:U.S. Air Force to the rescue! by NonSenseAgency · · Score: 5, Informative

      The X-37B, the Space Shuttle, all current anti-satellite missiles, in short all systems that the military currently acknowledges having cannot reach far enough to "destroy" the satellite. Such an outcome is not even desirable as it would turn the satellite into a field of orbiting buckshot that would "mostly" remain in the same orbit. Which is to say some would not and would inevitably impact nearby satellites and possibly create more problems. Likewise, hitting it with a ground based laser, although probably doable, would not be a good idea. As it stands now, the satellite will not come back to Earth, there is no danger of reentry. It will most likely end up at the Lagrange point as has already been stated.

  2. No, and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As was clearly stated the last time we had this exact discussion:

    - far too high for the space shuttle
    - most assuredly too high for most anti-sat missiles

  3. Satellite Hunting License . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    With "privatize the space industry" all in vogue these days, the government should issue Satellite Hunting Licenses to private companies, with $$$ prizes for taking it out.

    Let the private sector nail that varmint!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  4. Shuttle? by TamCaP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The part about the shuttle is obviously a joke, right? It can barely make it to the LEO, it is not able to reach a very highly located geosynchronous orbit. + why would you want to risk the lives of the crew and send a completely crazy unscheduled mission? And for some cheapo (in space terms) comms satellite? If they will send anything, it will be an unmanned mission, but even this is unlikely.

  5. They can't by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US doesn't appear to have a system capable of destroying something at that orbit.

    Now the first paragraph in the article is just full of ignorance.

    "Will the military need to be called in to blow up the rogue Intelsat satellite meandering through Earth's orbit? Or maybe a NASA Space Shuttle could swing by and grab it?"

    Again, the military hasn't demonstrated the ability to hit things in that orbit. The Shuttle can't go that high.

    The F-15 launched ASM-135 ASAT - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT - could go up to 350 miles.
    USA-193 was destroyed at 130 miles

    Galaxy 15 is at 22,230 miles

    1. Re:They can't by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if the US would have such a capability they would not tip their hand to show it off.
      Why show your enemies what you can really do?

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:They can't by glwtta · · Score: 4, Funny

      The F-15 launched ASM-135 ASAT - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT [wikipedia.org] - could go up to 350 miles.

      Galaxy 15 is at 22,230 miles


      So that just means you need 64 of them, right?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  6. Lasers? by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if everyone on earth pointed their laser pointers at it at the same time? It would have at least as good a chance as sending the space shuttle.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  7. Re:When China does it... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    When China does it, the world protests. all the space junk created. However, when the US does it, it's to save other satellites.

    The US did it before China and people were very critical:

    The official explanation – that the US wanted to prevent the toxic contents of the spacecraft's fuel tank from hitting the ground – seems a bit thin, according to James Lewis, director of the technology and public policy program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Thus critics from around the world have speculated about ulterior motives, ranging from a desire to test US ballistic missile defenses to poking China in the eye.

    It's a sort of anti-satellite arms race and status thing between two super power. Or in playground terms, the two assholes are having a dick measuring contest.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. Re:When China does it... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, the two shots were Apples and Oranges.

    USA-193 was in a decaying orbit at 130 miles and most of the debris de orbited within a couple weeks. It was hit by a small SM-3 surface to air missile, 21 feet long, 3,000 pounds

    FY-1C was in a stable polar orbit at 537 miles and it's destruction increased the amount of space debris by 12%. The missile that hit it was a DF-21, 35 feet long, 30,000 pounds

  9. What about by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay I'm not an expert on how they get satellites up to geosynchronous orbit, but it seems to me the most expedient way would be to re-purpose what ever delivery system they use to get the things up there in the first place.

  10. Re:#3: would cause huge amount of debris by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this stops satellite TV stations from polluting the skies with gameshows and comedies, I'm all in favour of blowing the satellite up in the way that causes the worst debris field possible.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. Obligatory XKCD: Gravity Wells by starglider29a · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://xkcd.com/681_large/
    In particular, look at the panel of Earth, which is under Uranus and Neptune, lower right.

    Geez, XKCD should win the Pulitzer Prize for this graphic. If a picture is worth a KiloWord, this is worth a MegaWord of explanation. This should be required viewing in all 8th Grade science classes.