Slashdot Mirror


The Parking Meter Turns 75 Today

nj_peeps writes "75 years ago Carl Magee filed a patent application for what would become one of the most hated inventions in history: the parking meter. From the article: 'Magee's brainwave was to install a device that had a coin acceptor and a dial to engage a timing mechanism. A visible pointer and flag indicated the expiration of the paid period, meaning you either had to move, put in more money, or face the wrath of the local constabulary. The design continued largely unchanged for more than 40 years.'"

126 comments

  1. So.. by Jorl17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Parking Meter: Haunting humankind for 75 years.

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    1. Re:So.. by zeon · · Score: 1

      75 is fairly old... maybe it will die soon.

    2. Re:So.. by JohannesJ · · Score: 1

      In the news today: I'd rather be a toll Collector than a meter . They get Millions of dollars in unused sick time and benefits. Not a bad Job for somebody who only needs an IQ = their shoe size Huh? Not that these people necessarily have that IQ but they may, How much brains does it take to collect tolls ?

  2. Hey parking meter... by drc003 · · Score: 1

    ...F you buddy! I got a baseball bat with your name written all over it. Looks like you have 75 good swings headed your way, PUNK!

  3. Yes, they piss me off by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax on top of what you've already paid to park there.

    That sounds great, doesn't it?

    I'm assuming there was no vote when these things were put into play?

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Yes, they piss me off by jack2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Write to your congressmen. Make them scrap those abominations!

    2. Re:Yes, they piss me off by Comboman · · Score: 1

      The money derived from parking meters typically doesn't even pay for the cost of the meter-maids to enforce them. They are not a revenue source for the city, but rather a way to control how long people park in busy downtown areas.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    3. Re:Yes, they piss me off by pclminion · · Score: 1

      So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax on top of what you've already paid to park there.

      It isn't a tax, it's a deterrent to prevent too many people trying to park in the middle of downtown. In my city, there are areas with meters and areas with free parking. Guess which areas I can never find a parking spot?

    4. Re:Yes, they piss me off by RIAAShill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax on top of what you've already paid to park there.

      That sounds great, doesn't it?

      Sounds better than driving around for an hour trying to find a parking spot. Putting a price tag on a spot encourages use of public transit or private parking. It can also discourage even visiting in the first place, so municipialities and businesses have to consider whether demand is strong enough to support parking meters (or, in many cases, whether more investment in free parking is justified).

      $2 an hour for a good shot at a nice parking spot, along with the knowledge that I'm giving a boost to help fund improvements in the roads, schools, and other assets and services, doesn't seem like such a bad deal to me.

    5. Re:Yes, they piss me off by JesseL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The money collected from the meters may not amount to much, but the revenue from parking tickets for lapsed meters is spectacular.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    6. Re:Yes, they piss me off by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax on top of what you've already paid to park there.

      It's either let the city collect parking fees, or pay more in taxes to make those parking spaces available for free to everyone. Pick one. But remember, "free" parking isn't really free. Those spaces could be put to a more lucrative use. So by not charging for parking, you're cheating yourself as a taxpayer.

      And then consider a parking lot where the parking is free but the parking lot never fills up. If you can't give something away for free, don't we call that "trash"? Why would anyone want to live in a city full of trash?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:Yes, they piss me off by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      It's not a tax, nobody is withholding parking money from your paycheck or tacking it onto the price of everything you buy. It's a fee for service (something I thought all the /. armchair libertarian economists would approve of).

      By occupying a parking space, you consume a limited resource. The meter (standing in for the resource's owner) extracts a fee proportional to the amount consumed. It's like something right out of market economics 101.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    8. Re:Yes, they piss me off by russotto · · Score: 1

      The money collected from the meters may not amount to much, but the revenue from parking tickets for lapsed meters is spectacular.

      Especially when the meters run fast (yes, Philadelphia, I mean you. If I put an hour in a meter and come back 58 minutes later and it says "expired", something crooked is going on. My watch isn't that slow)

  4. Hated, but necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You really think it would make it easier to park in large cities for short errands if they didn't exist? Thank God someone actually thought enough to address the problem.

    1. Re:Hated, but necessary by bunratty · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Where do you think you are? This is Slashdot, where no one cares about the unintended consequences of their actions or policy changes. We just want to get software for free, get music for free, park for free, to use other people's brilliant ideas for free. What could possibly go wrong with that plan?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Hated, but necessary by drc003 · · Score: 1

      So parking meters are only in large area's where they are actually needed? Yeah, OK. I personally do not hate parking meters that are in the type of places you describe. The problem is that in most cities I have been in they are everywhere. Most of them in places that would have no issues without them at all. The parking meter may have come to be for a solid reason but once they realized the money they could make they were expanded everywhere for one reason: To "nickel and dime" citizens for every cent($15 - $50) they could get.

    3. Re:Hated, but necessary by SalsaDoom · · Score: 0, Interesting

      According to Rick Berman, absolutely nothing ;) Slashdot's just leading the way to a better future for everyone. Once we get rid of financial incentives we will have our flying cars in no time, baby.

      --
      "Computers will never truly be free until the last windows user is strangled with the entrails of the last mac user."
    4. Re:Hated, but necessary by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where I live(that mystical place called Canada), they figured out that it cost businesses more money if there were meters then 2hr free parking, along with 15min errand spots. When we switched from meters to non, business downtown went up by 40%, and so did the available tax revenue.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Hated, but necessary by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      Can you provide any citation? I'd love to have it on hand in case this subject ever comes up in future.

    6. Re:Hated, but necessary by Smauler · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in a small town in the UK, and I sincerely believe that parking costs are the biggest factor in driving people from the town businesses to out of town supermarkets. I really believe upping business rates a little, and making parking free except for a few key places would spur growth in the town no end. For those who don't know English towns, space is _always_ at a premium, and generally there is little to no roadside parking - what parking there is is generally a council owned extortionate multi-storey relatively (hopefully) close to town centre.

    7. Re:Hated, but necessary by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where I live(that mystical place called Canada), they figured out that it cost businesses more money if there were meters then 2hr free parking, along with 15min errand spots. When we switched from meters to non, business downtown went up by 40%, and so did the available tax revenue.

      Vancouver City Council is actually deciding to extend the parking meter hours to include Sunday as well. Turns out that the meters get moderated traffic, but on Sunday, it becomes a royal PITA to find a parking spot, short of paying at a parking garage.

      Good and bad, it seems. Parking meters help encourage short term high-turnover parking, which businesses do like. The flip side is, well, potential loss of customers for those adverse to paying. Free parking, and you get stores angry that some employee working upstairs parked right in front of their store during most of the day, rotating every couple of hours or so.

      It's a tough call for a city planner.

    8. Re:Hated, but necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the anon who started this comment thread, I'd love to see that research too, it sounds really awesome!

    9. Re:Hated, but necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the problem there is: Where are you going to FIT all the new parking garages, in an already-full area? Tear down some buildings?

    10. Re:Hated, but necessary by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not buying it either without a citation.

        I have one, though--In his book 'Traffic', Tom Vanderbilt explains why having meters actually IMPROVES business. Without meters, people park their cars in front of your store and leave it there all day, preventing new customers from coming to your store.

       

    11. Re:Hated, but necessary by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, I guess you said "2 hour parking spots"... I posted too quickly...sorry.

    12. Re:Hated, but necessary by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm an American, but I lived in England for several years. Maybe it's my American bias, but we would always pick stores that had free parking over trying to find a garage or meter to park at. Lots of British stores are starting to figure it out (ASDA and Sainsbury's, in our case).

    13. Re:Hated, but necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live in a place called Holland, where government greed is raised to the level of art. There they did away with the classical parking meters. Instead, there's a central dispenser on the parking lot where you buy your ticket, to be placed behind the windshield. This avoids people just "adding time" to the meter (or if it's a quick errand, not paying at all if there's enough time left).

    14. Re:Hated, but necessary by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      You really think it would make it easier to park in large cities for short errands if they didn't exist? Thank God someone actually thought enough to address the problem.

      Please, meters make no difference in ease of parking, currently if you get a ticket and you have the spot for the day that is unless you are parked somewhere where they will tow you (hydrant etc.) or you have more than 3 tickets unpaid and get towed or booted.

      The meters make no difference in the time people spend in the spots, they just add to the price of shopping in those areas.

      If they really wanted to do something to address the problem with parking in urban areas they would discourage the use of automobiles there period. The Stockholm Solution Other cities do the same thing with similar results.

  5. Anyone got any coins? Please? by OFnow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They won't accept pennies. 99% accept only coins. San Francisco is talking about 7 day a week
    parking meter enforcement, Many at $3 per hour (or more?). And in San Francisco the
    collection/enforcement departments spend more money than the meters take in! Net loss.

    1. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      And in San Francisco the collection/enforcement departments spend more money than the meters take in! Net loss.

      Is that per ticket, or the department as a whole? (i.e. if the number of tickets went up, would the department start to turn a profit?) Because any use of financial penalties should ALWAYS cost more than it brings in per use.

      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstand. San Francisco prefers fines to coins.

    3. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Simple solution switch to credit card based machines with camera enforcement. This lets you reduce workforce and raise/lower rates based on time of day.

    4. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Some places allow you to pay for parking by sending an SMS.

      Sure not everyone always has a mobile phone handy. But not everyone always has enough coins either :).

      --
    5. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I would argue that parking meter enforcement's merits are unrelated to profit or loss of the operation. If the purpose of parking meters is to increase parking space turnaround so that more people are able to park in a certain area, such as a congested downtown commercial district, then that purpose is met as long as drivers are sufficiently incentivized to give up parking spaces after a reasonable amount of time (either by the cost of paying the meter for more time or by the expected cost of parking tickets (probability of receiving a ticket times dollar figure on the ticket). Similarly, speeding enforcement on highways is supposed to be about making the roads safer rather than making a profit for the government. Of course, the justifiable purposes of doing something rarely and only briefly have anything to do with the real purposes at work.

    6. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Are you in the Dark Ages or something? Around here you can use a credit card if you want.

    7. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by OFnow · · Score: 1

      Yes, the dark ages. There are an insigificant
      number of more modern meters, but those few
      reportedly require a special meter card, not
      ones credit card. Good Grief.

      Ken Garcia, local columnist, reported
      earlier this year that
      the San Francisco department that handles
      meters spends more in salary and maintenance
      than the meters bring in.

    8. Re:Anyone got any coins? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the big picture. The point of enforcement departments is exactly that---enforcement. It's not to turn over a profit. Enforcement assures that people who want to park have a reasonable chance at getting a spot. Millions or more of dollars worth of business may be lost in San Francisco if it was impossible to use your car to do business because parking wasn't enforced.

  6. Cool Hand Luke . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Captain: "Maliciously destroying municipal property while under the influence. What was that?"

    Luke: "Cutting the heads off of parking meters, Captain."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Cool Hand Luke . . . by sconeu · · Score: 1

      What we have here, is the successful ability to communicate!

      I had the same thought.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. Not a fan, but.... by Itninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a bigger city near my home there are no parking meters. Instead, each parking spot int he business district is a '30 minutes only' (or sometimes only 15 minutes) between 7AM and 6PM. At least with meters you can pay more money and get to stay longer. In these spots all you can do is leave before Officer Cool (seriously that's his name) writes you a ticket.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Not a fan, but.... by ShadyG · · Score: 1

      When I lived in San Francisco, they were pretty strict about "no feeding the meters". That is to say, they design the meters to go only up to, say 30 minutes, and that's it. If it runs out you get a ticket, but if they catch you putting more money in, you get one too. Best of both worlds!

    2. Re:Not a fan, but.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Meter feeding is supposed to be against the rules just about everywhere there's parking meters, but enforcement can very considerably. The really strict places don't count on catching you feeding more coins in--they'll chalk mark your tires to track how long you've been there, and ticket you if you're over the max time even if you have time on the meter.

    3. Re:Not a fan, but.... by nj_peeps · · Score: 1

      I remember looking for the chalk make when I was kid, and my dad would give me a quarter to put in the meter when we on the boardwalk.. ahhh the good old days when a quarter would give you at least 30 to 40 min.

      --
      "Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security" --Benjamin Franklin
    4. Re:Not a fan, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I treat chalk marks on my tires like any other form of graffiti. If you don't remove it immediately, the taggers assume you don't care, and then there's no end to it.

    5. Re:Not a fan, but.... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Not every place with a parking meter has a maximum parking time...

  8. Why is this in YRO? by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is parking for free an inalienable right now? Did I miss a recent update to the US/EU constitutions?

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:Why is this in YRO? by mcsqueak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Parking shouldn't be free, we already subsidize driving enough as it is without allowing people the unlimited ability to park their private property on public land, as long as they would like. Make them pay for the privilege, it's part of the "privilege" (not right) of driving.

      I also enjoy the turnover parking meters create, ensuring that most of the time when I need to run an errand downtown and have to drive, I can find a spot with minimal trouble.

    2. Re:Why is this in YRO? by Shirogitsune · · Score: 1

      Parking meters for the information super-highway?

    3. Re:Why is this in YRO? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Is parking for free an inalienable right now?

      It should have been since the beginning. I guess the founding fathers forgot a couple.

    4. Re:Why is this in YRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Chicago you pay a private company to park your private property on public land that you've already paid for with your tax dollars. Even if you don't drive you pay for it and businesses already pay to have their businesses in these locations. Its a money scam where the government squeezes us for every dollar it can.

    5. Re:Why is this in YRO? by operagost · · Score: 1
      I assume you have already reviewed the studies that show parking meters improve the availability of parking.

      By the way, the curb is technically not public land. It's on an easement. In the USA, deeds usually extend into the roadway. I doubt this differs any even if you are in a big city. Evidence? You have to clear snow from your sidewalk in many cities. Either I'm right (I know MY deed extends into the road), or everyone is a bunch of morons who enjoy involuntary servitude to the government.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Why is this in YRO? by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      I should have specified I meant in business and commercial districts. Obviously you have some right to park in front of a house you rent/own. Subsidize parking for drivers in the middle of a downtown core? Forget it.

  9. End of an era... by sponga · · Score: 4, Informative

    Parking Meter is dying...
    Cheaper operations and ones that produce more written tickets for violators are more productive.
    Being replaced by 'buy a ticket for half-day or full day' or more modern digital ones that detect when a car moves from the spot so the next person doesn't get free time.

    Let us not forget the 'Parking Meter Fairy' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKTFCdpBsAA
    Although only to find out it is illegal to put coins in other peoples time slots, those things are nothing but a source for parking tickets and as we call the Ticket writers around here 'Vultures'.

    Oklahoma City site of first parking meter
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZQgPRFgkOA

    How to Hack a Parking Meter
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2CZ6yHJdBs

    How to hack electronic parking gates
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BA37BmMgBc

    How to Rip-off a Parking meter
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOz7cdNaQ3c

    Hi Tech Parking Meter, Los Angeles
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y76VFJ0LoOU

    1. Re:End of an era... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being replaced by 'buy a ticket for half-day or full day' or more modern digital ones that detect when a car moves from the spot so the next person doesn't get free time.

      Free time? How about over charging? Some cities require license plate to be recorded to park at zone. Non transferable and no refund if you leave early.

    2. Re:End of an era... by fermion · · Score: 1
      I would hardly say parking meters are the most hated inventions in history. I might think that handicapped spots are more hated. They let arguably healthy people get the best spots, while those that do not have paid doctors to give then a free pass have to pay to park further away.

      I mean the only way to get a ticket at the parking meter is to not pay for the meter. Those of who live in the city know how valuable meters are. They encourage the flow of traffic so that everyone gets an opportunity to park. The new meters may seem a bit less fair, as we can no longer borrow time from the previous person, but they do get rid of the issue of accidentally paying the wrong meter, and allow for the odd day when on wants to drive around town instead of walk. Once you have permit, it is good for the day.

      Of course we all want to freeload, but that is not really something we all can do. I frankly would be ok with banning all on street parking in town as that would make driving much safer, but people seem to want on street parking, and the city won't get rid of it because it does generate revenue.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:End of an era... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      In our city, we've got a bit of both, the meters are slowly being phased out.

      But the new ones are basically an electronic booth that covers about half a block, or an entire parking lot. You go up, you pay the alotted amount, and enter your license plate. You don't have to leave anything on your dash, you don't have a timer to look at, there are no sensors for your spot.

      Every once in a while a meter maid drives by, checks the database for that booth. If you aren't in the Database, DING.

    4. Re:End of an era... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modern digital ones that detect when a car moves from the spot so the next person doesn't get free time.

      That's not "free time." I paid for the right to park in that spot for 30 minutes, and if I leave before that time is up, I expect that the next parker will get to make use of the time I bought.

    5. Re:End of an era... by Rewind · · Score: 1

      Granted I live in a smaller city (little over 180,000 in the metro/city area, much less in the core 'downtown') but we recently got rid of our parking meters. Now they just have signs that say 45 minute parking between 6 and 6. A bicycle cop rides around and if he sees the same car long enough he tickets it. Seems to me much more effective than the parking meters. At the very least I can actually park in front of my apartment now to do quick things like unload groceries rather than park forever away and make multiple trips to haul them all in.

      --
      ?
    6. Re:End of an era... by Smauler · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've got reserved spaces for parents with children at all our supermarkets in the UK now - Personally, I think that if your kid can't walk the extra 50 yards to get into the sugar laden crammed supermarkets you've got bigger fucking problems than not being able to park right next to the door.

      No, I'm not bitter...

    7. Re:End of an era... by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's so you can get your kid and the shopping safely into the car without having to walk through a busy, dangerous car park with a trolley full of food and a kid running in front of cars. It wouldn't be so bad, only nowadays people seem to drive like fucking idiots and going at 15 mph for a few seconds until they leave the car park means they might miss a few seconds of X-Factor or something.

    8. Re:End of an era... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Alternative method for ripping off parking meters.
      [trailer park boys clip: not for young or sensitive viewers] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyOHuddEp14

  10. I remember those. by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    Security easily defeated with a McDonald's straw. Or a reasonable facsimile of the official "out of order" bag they used to place over the broken ones.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  11. Real Men of Genius by RichMan · · Score: 1

    The spandex inventor gets recognition.
    The guy who invented the parking meter not so much.

  12. Exact URL/link to the story. by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  13. I am fine with the meters themselves by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Why hate the meters? They are there to make parking easier and more reliable for everyone. It's the enforcement that pisses me off to no end. Writing a ticket for a meter one minute expired, or for not having a front license on your car (like it somehow creates a hazard?). And the pricing... Why should meters be $2/hr? Ever? Who carries that much loose change?

    1. Re:I am fine with the meters themselves by bunratty · · Score: 1

      There's been a trend towards parking meters and parking stations that take credit cards.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:I am fine with the meters themselves by Comboman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why hate the meters?

      I agree. Now the guy who invented the pay toilet, that's another story.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    3. Re:I am fine with the meters themselves by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Parking meter enforcement is proof that government can be incredibly efficient and productive when it decides to. Here in New Orleans, we just finished 8 years under one of the most useless mayors imaginable, the police department is in shambles, oh and 75% of the city was underwater a few years back, but it'll only take a few minutes for them to ticket your car.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:I am fine with the meters themselves by conureman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they have a merce- private contractors doing it. When I lived in Los Angeles, Lockheed had gotten the parking ticket franchise and they seemed awesomely efficient. If someone got two free minutes, it was news around the neighborhood, and just forget about not paying for your oversight on street-sweeping day. (the metermaids did have to hold off until the sweeper actually passed your car, but I'd see them waiting every time, lined up behind the sweeper, and pre-entering data so they could jump right on it when the flag dropped.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  14. To keep spaces open for customers by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax

    Do you use the same complaint against toll roads?

    I'm assuming there was no vote when these things were put into play?

    Imagine that you run a coffee shop. You want your customers to use the space in front of the shop while in the shop, and you don't want someone who works across the street to hog the space for 8 hours straight. So to keep the spaces open for customers, you restrict parking time to how long it takes to buy and consume coffee and a sandwich.

    1. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax

      Do you use the same complaint against toll roads?

      Yes.

    2. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine that individual businesses had the power to set meter pricing and time limits... You would be on another planet, somewhere in a different solar system. The meters are there at the whim of the city. Properly used, they can be great tools. Misused or overused, and they can be a headache and a deterrent to regular customers.

    3. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Do you use the same complaint against toll roads?

      Oh heck ya I do. I lived in Atlanta after they put in the 400 toll road. Allegedly, it was only going to be a toll-road for as long as it took to "pay off the cost of the construction". It was built in...I wanna say 1995? I know it was there for the 96 Olympics. I left Atlanta for Northern VA 3 years ago. I went back to visit ~3 months ago and the damned thing was still going strong.

      Imagine that you run a coffee shop. You want your customers to use the space in front of the shop while in the shop, and you don't want someone who works across the street to hog the space for 8 hours straight. So to keep the spaces open for customers, you restrict parking time to how long it takes to buy and consume coffee and a sandwich.

      Yes, because it should be your customer's problem that you can't plan your parking access better. I don't understand this mentality. (Not trying to offend, I just don't understand how something that is YOUR problem, ie, the coffee shop owner, suddenly becomes the customer's problem.)

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    4. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by micheas · · Score: 1

      So, taxes pay for the roads, the sidewalks, etc. If you pay taxes, and you park where these fucking abominations are, then you get the pleasure of paying another tax

      Do you use the same complaint against toll roads?

      Yes.

      However, toll bridges in the bay area are mostly supported by the tolls, as the population decided to slowly lower the effective tax rate in the state. many decades ago.

    5. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, toll bridges in the bay area are mostly supported by the tolls...

      Huh, and all this time i thought they were supported by pylons, towers, and cables. Fancy that...

    6. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Imagine that you run a coffee shop. You want your customers to use the space in front of the shop while in the shop, and you don't want someone who works across the street to hog the space for 8 hours straight. So to keep the spaces open for customers, you restrict parking time to how long it takes to buy and consume coffee and a sandwich.

      Except that you can still hog that space for 8 hours, it's just going to cost you.

      Instead of parking meters you put green zones in if the true intended effect is space turn over and not "revenue" generation.

    7. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      Allegedly, it was only going to be a toll-road for as long as it took to "pay off the cost of the construction". It was built in...I wanna say 1995?

      My parents tell me the Tri-state tollway in Illinois (built in the 1950s) was sold the same way. It's still toll today.

    8. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by tepples · · Score: 1

      Parking meter pricing is standardized throughout the city at a token amount, which is supposed to be just enough to prove that a vehicle hasn't been unattended for more than the set period. Time limits are related to the adjacent building's zoning.

    9. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by tepples · · Score: 1

      Except that you can still hog that space for 8 hours, it's just going to cost you.

      The hog still has to visit the space every few minutes to feed the meter. The time on the meter is capped at a reasonable amount of time to get in, order, eat, and get out, and any further minutes are forfeited.

    10. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by micheas · · Score: 1

      However, toll bridges in the bay area are mostly supported by the tolls...

      Huh, and all this time i thought they were supported by pylons, towers, and cables. Fancy that...

      Nope, unicorn farts.

    11. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      My parents tell me the Tri-state tollway in Illinois (built in the 1950s) was sold the same way. It's still toll today.

      That would be frustrating. If something is built with a toll system to pay for it, you should be able to call a number (or visit a website these days) and see how much is left to pay off.

      The only other reason I could think that a toll is still levied is that it continues to pay for maintenance. In that way, the people who actually use (and wear down) the road are responsible for paying the upkeep.

      Here in Oregon, the Astoria-Megler bridge connecting Oregon to Washington was a toll bridge for a long time. They finally removed the toll booths sometime in the 90's and made it free. You can still see marks where the booths were though.

    12. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yep. There's no such thing as a temporary tax.

    13. Re:To keep spaces open for customers by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Imagine that you run a coffee shop. You want your customers to use the space in front of the shop while in the shop, and you don't want someone who works across the street to hog the space for 8 hours straight. So to keep the spaces open for customers, you restrict parking time to how long it takes to buy and consume coffee and a sandwich."

      That'd be great except that you, as the coffee shop owner, do NOT own that road. That road belongs to the taxpayers. You have no right to restrict who parks on the PUBLIC street. It would be a different story if YOU owned the road. Of course, that would mean that YOU have to pay to build the road in the first place. If you're willing to pay for it, then be my guest, you have every right to charge for use of the road.

      What the real issue here is that the coffee shop owner wants to take PRIVATE control of PUBLIC property. I might as well try and claim ownership of the police station down the street and charge everyone who works there for use of the building.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  15. Ah...city revenue in a box... by aicrules · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really didn't care about them too much till they installed them in front of my house. Granted I lived downtown at the time, but it was a house, not an apartment. Thankfully there was a street within walking distance that had no meters at least till I moved away. There was this old guy in the neighborhood that would always walk the roads nearby with a bag of change after they installed them and refill people's meters. He used to just walk around and talk to the people who would be sitting on their front porch, but apparently he had enough disposable income to keep about 50 parking meters fresh all day.

    And as nice and selfless as that was, that hurt the city income enough that they made a local ordinance against filling other people's meters. They even tried to ticket him more than once. Then they started chalk marking tires to see if they went past a certain time and ticketed them anyway. Just another reason I grew up to be the anti-tax, anti-government program person I am today.

    1. Re:Ah...city revenue in a box... by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      It amazes me that we find that we have to pay for parking on a public street. Because someone turned off the engine and got out makes you liable to rent the curb time. What if my car moved asymptotically slowly?

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Ah...city revenue in a box... by eh2o · · Score: 1

      Parking fines are are a non-democratic means that the city uses to fund certain operations that, for whatever reason be it lack of popularity or laziness, are not otherwise provisioned by legitimate sources of revenue that are approved by the public opinion. Its a clear conflict of interest and the injustice of fining is so obvious that its one of the leading frustrations that people cite in discussions of government annoyances. But I think we should differentiate between objections to what is essentially government corruption versus an objection to democratic governance in general.

  16. Only one thing to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you Carl Magee.

  17. Parking meters are democratic by mangu · · Score: 1

    What would you do about the freeriders who come from out of town and park here? They don't pay any taxes in this town. And what about people who don't have any cars? Should they pay taxes for your parking place?

    The best thing would be to get rid of all taxes and charge directly for every public service. Can't pay? Get a job! Or look for a charity organization that's willing to support you.

    1. Re:Parking meters are democratic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like the typical ignorant American "libertarian"...
      Try walking in the shoes of that person who can't find a job for a day and see how you like it...

    2. Re:Parking meters are democratic by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

      Spoken like the typical ignorant American "libertarian"... Try walking in the shoes of that person who can't find a job for a day and see how you like it...

      HOW? They wouldn't have shoes in the first place!

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
  18. There's something worse by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Downtown Portland Oregon got rid of their curbside parking meters. Used to be, you got out of your car and put in a quarter or a dime (or a nickel if you're an old fogey), twisted the little thingy and went on your way.

    Now you get out of your car, lock the doors (this is Portland...), walk a half block to the ticket vendor machine, and go through the five discrete steps necessary to print a ticket. Assuming you're successful, you walk back to your car, unlock the door (this is Portland...) affix the ticket to your window with the sticky back, lock the door, and go on your way.

    During rush hour, you may wait in line for a significant amount of time to get your ticket. Especially if the moron in front of you can not read directions, but I digress. Parenthetically, what happens if the meter maid happens by while you're in line for your ticket? I haven't had this experience yet.

    When you get back to your car, peel off the ticket and throw it on the ground. Just kidding, you're supposed to hunt for a trash can, or throw it on the floor of your car along with the empty coffee cups and breakfast burrito wrappers, but looking at the gutters downtown it appears that a lot of people just drop them on the ground.

    So we've replaced the purely mechanical, non-waste-producing (but generally hated) parking meter with an electronic, waste-producing, geographically distant, ticket vending machine that's even more hated.

    Time marches on.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:There's something worse by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      I like the recent Portland meters. I've only once or twice had to wait behind someone who had trouble operating the meter, and I love that they take debit cards, since I usually don't keep a bunch of change on me.

    2. Re:There's something worse by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's with the "this is Portland" thing? Portland has car prowlers like any city, but nothing particularly out of the ordinary. And anyway, why lock your door? Do you WANT a broken window? What are you keeping in there, suitcases of $100's?

    3. Re:There's something worse by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the idea is that you're not supposed to own a car, and that the private automobile is a wasteful, selfish mode of transportation? Ever think of that? Maybe the idea is to make every facet of car ownership irritating and oppressive, so that you'll have your car recycled and ride a bicycle instead? Ever think about how good it would feel to stop contributing to climate change and instead use a sustainable method of transportation?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:There's something worse by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      We've had the same system in Sweden for decades, except we don't affix the tickets to the windows, they're just paper tickets that lay on the dashboard. I've never seen a curb-side parking meter here, seems like a waste of money to me to build one for each spot... But then I don't have a car, subways and buses work fine.

    5. Re:There's something worse by roc97007 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You know how often it rains here?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:There's something worse by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Car makers out there should make bullet and bat proof glasses the standard.

    7. Re:There's something worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who rarely keeps greenbacks on his person let alone coinage I'm quite happy with the ability to walk half a block to pay by plastic. Locking doors isn't an issue either since my circa 1995 vehicle came equipped with a handy dandy remote that lets me lock and unlock the thing on the go. Different strokes I suppose.

    8. Re:There's something worse by pclminion · · Score: 1

      How expensive would it be?

      A few months ago my wife learned the lesson the hard way. She left her cheapie cell phone on the seat of her car, parked in front of her parents house in boring suburbia. Somebody smashed the window to take the worthless phone. The best part? Door was unlocked.

      Lock the door, get a smashed window. Don't lock the door, get a smashed window. The solution is to leave the window rolled down and remove everything of value from the car.

    9. Re:There's something worse by pete6677 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You first. And that means no accepting rides in other peoples' cars, and no home deliveries since that always involves cars. Nothing but a bike or you're a hypocrite.

    10. Re:There's something worse by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Suuure, lets roll over for thieves. I don't know invent some form of tempered glass that's thin as the ones used today but unbreakable with stones, bats etc. OH WAIT! There is such glass already! It's not bullet proof but hey, it's cheaper and atleast it's something.

    11. Re:There's something worse by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      We have a better variation on this system in much of Western Canada (and likely the rest of the country). First of all, there are no more paper tickets to put on the dash. When you pay, you enter your license plate number and the zone you parked in, and that plate is then entered into the system with the appropriate amount of time. Secondly, you don't _have_ to use the kiosk--you can phone in your payment, as you're walking away from your car. On average, there are two kiosks per block on each side of the street, so you don't have to go (much) out of your way. Once you've paid, you don't have to go back to your car, and you no longer have to carry change, since you can pay with debit or credit cards. Also, you can pay at _any_ kiosk in the city, not just the one in your parking zone. Thus, if you've parked half a block past the kiosk, you can just keep walking to wherever you're going and pay at the next one you pass. (there's a bit of a grace period, probably at least ten minutes, although I'm not sure.)

      It's a very good system, and much more scaleable than buying thousands upon thousands of mechanical meters that have to be emptied out every few hours. The only drawback is that the keypad and display on the kiosks we have are total crap.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    12. Re:There's something worse by pclminion · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. If a thief wants to get in my car, he will. What would be "rolling over" is paying $150 from my own pocket every time a window gets smashed. No fucking way dude.

    13. Re:There's something worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that they won't start charging for parking your bicycle outside?

    14. Re:There's something worse by BBTaeKwonDo · · Score: 1
      Reasons why sticker meters are better (as far as city government is concerned), in no particular order:
      1. Faster to empty 1 machine than vs. collecting the change from all those meters individually
      2. Accepts payment in forms other than change - customers like the convenience, plus it's easier to raise rates (generally, people are willing to spend more when they can charge something)
      3. no free loaders from the last person leaving before the time is up
      4. no need to paint and repaint lines marking the spaces
      5. fits more vehicles in the available space
      6. 1 machine is easier to keep in good working condition than several meters

      So you have a point about the sticker thing and the wasted time for end-users, but I think 1, 4 and 5 offset that in terms of waste.

    15. Re:There's something worse by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "no free loaders from the last person leaving before the time is up"

      I think I could make a case that having to buy 15 minutes of time for a four minute transaction, and the next person has to buy 15 more minutes that overlap my minutes, the city is the one freeloading.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  19. Paging Luke Jackson by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get out your pipe cutter and celebrate.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  20. I don't mind parking meteres. by Petersko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live and work in a busy downtown area. If there were no meters all spots would be taken by 8:00 a.m. and anybody coming downtown during the day to do business would be out of luck.

    Parking meters don't just take in money, they help moderate the usage of the space.

    1. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by roadsider · · Score: 1

      I truly hate parking meters only when I see them in front of a whole streets worth of empty storefronts. Parking costs almost can't be high enough in big, bustling cities because automobiles tend to destroy the urban environment. Take transit. Or, park it in a garage and walk. Or just walk. Driving isn't a right. Owning a car isn't a right. And parking it where ever you damn well please isn't a right.

      Parking is only a problem for those too lazy to walk.

    2. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      I work in a busy downtown area with parking meters but they are hardly used because anyone with a handicap tag can park all day without paying so all the metered spots are always taken. Might as well remove the meters and just designate it as handicap parking.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    3. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by operagost · · Score: 1
      Or who can't walk very well. Or who don't have time to walk.

      Parking costs almost can't be high enough in big, bustling cities because automobiles tend to destroy the urban environment.

      Concrete, asphalt and steel isn't my idea of an "environment".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is I'm too lazy to walk 45 miles to class or walk the 5 miles to the bus station to get to class 2 hours early and leave 2 hours late after an 8 hour day?

      Cars are only a problem for those too stuck up to realize their fucking HUGE utility.

    5. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by roadsider · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. That's what I meant.

      Dip shit.

    6. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by thenextstevejobs · · Score: 1

      Maybe OT but, what about STREET CLEANING? That shit is a scam.

      --
      Long live the BSD license
    7. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by roadsider · · Score: 1

      Yes. And for the chronically late we should rip down whole blocks of historic urban architecure to make room for more parking.

    8. Re:I don't mind parking meteres. by oddTodd123 · · Score: 1

      Parking meters don't just take in money, they help moderate the usage of the space.

      Not only that, parking meters also shift some of the costs of our transportation network onto the people who are actually using it, like toll roads. They are economically preferable to taxes for paying for related infrastructure.

  21. And in other news... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    74 years ago today a psychotic Norwegian Brown Rat coupled with an unknown venomous reptile released by a frightened owner into the New York City sewer system. Several months later the first Parking Cop slithered up out of a storm drain, and life has never been the same since for car drivers in various cities around the world.

    The horrible new creature was able to subsist on little more than dung and rotting garbage, produced a new litter with every single case of copulation, and gets horny when abused.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  22. Have a happy retirement... by freddled · · Score: 1

    75 years? Must be time for them to retire!

  23. Cool hand Luke... by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

    sneers at your money grubbing parking meter.

    In other news man eats 52 eggs.

  24. the high cost of free parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I live(that mystical place called Canada), they figured out that it cost businesses more money if there were meters then 2hr free parking, along with 15min errand spots. When we switched from meters to non, business downtown went up by 40%, and so did the available tax revenue.

    Check out an excellent book called "The High Cost of Free Parking":

    http://www.google.ca/search?q=the+high+cost+of+free+parking

    There are cities where 30% of the traffic in an area is simply people circling looking for a (free) parking spot.

  25. I'll miss them when they're gone by PvtVoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...nothing better to lock your bike to.

  26. Higher-Tech meters by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

    In addition to meters that accept credit cards and cell phone payments, they have systems that can tell weather or not a particular space is occupied. If there's time left when you pull away, it resets to 0. If you're still there when time expires, it pages the meter reader with the location of your spot so they can come ticket you.

  27. I mind parking attendants and "revenue operators" by cheros · · Score: 1

    I'm perfectly OK with the principle of sharing that such meters are there to "help along".

    What gets me is the abuse. London has plenty of it:

    - when a meter is not working you're NOT allowed to park in some places. Yes, that's right, unless they can make money off it that space is going to stay empty!
    - parking wardens do not have a formalised process for checking their watches, yet some of them use that to determine expiry. There is plenty of evidence that some don'^t even bother to wait for expiry
    - I am personally grateful for not being there when my wife returned in time with the baby, put the baby in the back who threw up (babies do that occasionally). When she turned round from the clean up she found a ticket on the window. I think I may have lost it if I had seen that, I'm not quite sure how the person would have ended up, but I suspect some re-assembly may have been required.
    - they count on the hassle factor to get away with illegally issued tickets: evidence exists from insiders that your first protest letter is not even read but simply answered with a standard template denying the incorrect issue.
    - to make matters worse, London allows clampers, who have their own modus operandi for ensuring they earn well:
    * only non-traceable forms of payment are accepted, and they are generally unreceipted. That's a license for abuse as well as tax evasion
    * their staff generally uses up parking spaces in the area they patrol, thus increasing the chance of a violation.
    * they rarely carry ID that allows correct identification of (a) staff identity as well as (b) authorisation to work that area. I actually got out of a car clamp because I asked them for it and threatened to take them to the local police station for impersonating operators (I can be very convincing, and they had nothing).
    - last but not least we have the people that tow your car away. The original concept was to remove vehicles that were obstructions, these days it's simply an illegal way to increase the costs of a parking offence. I'm waiting for the first crooks that entertain themselves with loading up cars so marked, but drive them off for stripping instead of to the car pond.

    I now live in a city where parking enforcement is actually reasonable. You'll get fined, but not the very second the counter goes to zero, there are blue zones where you can park for free for an hour (with a parking disc) or permanent if you're a resident (for which you need a permit). If you're dumb and forget your residence card, they wave your first fine (but not afterwards, they're not dumb :-). At night you only get a ticket if you're parked in a way that forms an obstruction to emergency traffic. If you need to park for a day you can buy a ticket for that too online. This is how it should be.

    I'm also not very fond of shops implementing paid parking - if I go to spend my money there I should expect parking space to be part of the offering.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  28. Taxpayers elect the city council by tepples · · Score: 1

    That'd be great except that you, as the coffee shop owner, do NOT own that road. That road belongs to the taxpayers.

    And the taxpayers have decided through their representatives in city council that the owners of local small businesses have the entitlement to use the taxpayers' resources to deter people from parking like a dick. Small business owners pay good property tax money for this entitlement.

  29. Re:Unintended Consequences by conureman · · Score: 1

    As did most of my neighbors, I got quite a thrill when the local miscreants escalated the war on the meters from coin slot jamming up to decapitations. Someone figured out a way to blow out the front of the coin slot with some explosive device, and I guess that was it. (I got over forty bucks in change off the sidewalks after a particularly spectacular night of destruction.) Now the People's Republic of Bezerkley has those computerised sensors with the central pay-stations, and all the spaces collect money, all the time; No more using free leftover minutes. I used to be able to find a space with a broken meter within one block of any place I went. Now I have to park like five or six blocks away from where I'm going.
    Bummer dude.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  30. Happy 50th Birthday to the Laser by blair1q · · Score: 1

    And, thanks to the technological advancements represented by the parking meter, just 25 short years later, to the day, we had the laser.