Slashdot Mirror


Telcos Waking Up To the Value of Your Location

holy_calamity writes "Cell phone networks represent probably the most effective data collectors of all time: almost everyone's movements and communications are logged in some way by these firms thanks to the ubiquity of cell phones. Now they're beginning to wake up to the value of that data, as researchers mine call records to study travel and social patterns at previously unimaginable scales. Not surprisingly, some are thinking about how to monetize that data, too."

43 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. What's next, monetizing what people talk/text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is just more of the slope we are going down. I'm sure that soon, telcos will realize they have a nice stream of info they can mine/monetize by attaching voice recognition software to people chatting, and then sell that data, either "aggregate", or person by person and identifiable.

    Europe actually has lawmakers who might pass privacy laws. Maybe the EU can start by attaching severe penalties for using location information for anything but critical legal info?

  2. Value by anarche · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did someone say cheaper phone calls??

    --
    Wait! Whats a sig?
    1. Re:Value by Akido37 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did someone say cheaper phone calls??

      Yes, cheaper phone calls are why they're doing this. And with all that extra money you'll save, I have this great bridge in Brooklyn you should really check out.

    2. Re:Value by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      SMS charges are absolutely ludicrous.

      It amazes me that telcos can get away with charging so much for such a minimally network-intensive service.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:Value by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just wished the iPhone and Android let me have a background easy scripting language like python.

      It's what I missed when I finally had to switch away from the Nokia platform. Being able to write a small script that sent a position update to MY SERVER every 5 minutes.

      It was cool to see the lights come on and the garage door open when I pulled in the driveway and got off the bike. It was typically a 2.5 minute delay from when I pulled in the driveway and when the system detected I was home from the gps reporting to activate everything. Perfect timing as I then had my helmet off, took off the jacket and unstrapped the backpack from the seat.

      Come on Google and Apple, let us do cool stuff with our phones!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Value by Steve+S · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here you go:
      http://code.google.com/p/android-scripting/

      "Scripts can be run interactively in a terminal, in the background, or via Locale. Python, Perl, JRuby, Lua, BeanShell, JavaScript, Tcl, and shell are currently supported"

      --
      ------- Driver carries less than 64K of cache.
    5. Re:Value by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually a 5 minute delay. I only would transmit every 5 minutes to keep the battery life nearly the same as it was without the script running. and 2.5 minutes is less than the time it took for me to do what I needed in the driveway to get off the bike, etc.. worked great and was highly practical. Some days it all happened as I turned into the drive, others it would take about 3 minutes. I almost never had to wait for it. (except when the internet was down at home and it did not get updates.)

      if I did an update every 2.5 seconds my cellphone battery would be dead in 3 hours as it would be in a constant data transfer mode.

      Plus my trigger radius is somewhat large. IT's easy from the data to detect if I am headed home by position updates and location. so making smarter decisions on the data I can extrapolate my intentions and make the trigger radius bigger thus minimizing the delay when I get to the garage.

      Although I am a laid back guy. Waiting a minute is nothing to me, some people freak out and go on a rampage when they have to wait 1 second. A buddy of mine is like that.. I love torturing him by making him wait all the time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Value by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called "charging what the traffic will bear", and it's not "getting away" with anything - it's extremely smart pricing.

    7. Re:Value by izomiac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Out of curiosity, why not do a variable sleep based on your distance from home? Perhaps something like:

      Find position latitude & longitude
      Compare to home position to determine the (straight line) distance
      Subtract the trigger radius
      If the phone isn't in the trigger radius (i.e. positive distance):
      Divide the remaining distance by a maximum travel speed of ~70 mph
      Sleep for that period of time, with some minimum/maximum


      So long as you don't hang out around your trigger radius your battery life should be excellent, and you should get nearly instant response times.

  3. "Value Added" by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My guess is that the companies will try to charge their customers more for "location based services," and also charging the companies that use location data to actually provide those "services."

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:"Value Added" by siloko · · Score: 5, Funny

      My guess is they sell this data to the corrupt motherfuckers who are running our country so they know exactly where any miscreants are as soon as the do something remotely questionable! Bastards! Wait . . . there's someone at the door . . . I'll be right b

    2. Re:"Value Added" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Target 1133863 has been eliminated for non-compliance.

    3. Re:"Value Added" by scooter.higher · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Ramen
    4. Re:"Value Added" by eth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's too late.

      I have a police/fire scanner, and I regularly hear them talking about "pinging" cell phones, and "Unit XYZ, welfare concern, stage 2 cell phone hang up in the area of blah blah blah...", etc.

    5. Re:"Value Added" by dwandy · · Score: 3, Funny

      at least they were kind enough to submit the incomplete post to /. before elimination.

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  4. This has already been done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jack Dorsey (Twitter Founder) did this with bike couriers, ambulances, and fire trucks. Mologogo (http://www.mologogo.com/) allows you to do this somewhat as part of a social network, Google Latitude allows you to see who's close by. I wouldn't be surprised if we are already being tracked.

    As for ways for telcos to monetize this, I would imagine this data would make a PI's job a lot easier--as well as an unwanted stalker--individuals' locations in aggregate would be useful for real-time traffic data, or even for commuting stats. It sort of reminds me of a game called Monopoly Tycoon and how I could see how shoppers in my city were moving, and place my stores to maximize foot traffic.

    1. Re:This has already been done before... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm pretty sure this will fall afoul of some existing law regarding wiretapping or some such. Unless, of course, the customer opts in, or fails to opt out.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  5. Maybe we should charge them? by casings · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If government subsidized telcos want to use my data to make money, I think I will charge them for it. After all what travels on their tubes isn't their data, otherwise they couldn't be labeled common carriers.

    1. Re:Maybe we should charge them? by ScaredOfTheMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to the Credit Reporting Bureaus that use your data to make money. My money says Telco will simply see this as gravy, and not pass along any of the financial benefit to the customer.

    2. Re:Maybe we should charge them? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the phone companies will try to charge you for this. That would be more in keeping with their other behavior.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  6. prepaid is the way to go for privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you care at all about your privacy, buy prepaid with cash. They don't have any way to tie you to the specific phone that way.

    Otherwise, if you give them all your data, don't be surprised when they use it for all kinds of things you didn't imagine.

    Most people seem to take the philosophy of, "I'll just ask nicely and maybe they won't go all big brother on me". Me, I try to push towards the philosophy of, "Let's not give them this in the first place. Then there's no issue because it *cannot* be a problem".

    Not just for this but other things too. I admit it requires a few sacrifices, but really much less than you might think. Mostly what it requires is *thinking*.

    1. Re:prepaid is the way to go for privacy by zuckie13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until they force you to show ID to buy the prepaid phones.

    2. Re:prepaid is the way to go for privacy by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They don't have any way to tie you to the specific phone that way.

      Yeah. Because a phone that's been used to call your Mom, your job, your Wife, your girlfriend, your bank and your favorite dealer will be virtually impossible to tie to you.

    3. Re:prepaid is the way to go for privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  7. Well then, ... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess it's a good thing I don't have a cell phone. No cell phone, no tracking. No tracking, no data mining.

    About the best the marketers know about me is from my grocery shopping card, though what they glean from my buying a 5 lb. tub of Crisco, two 48-count packs of condoms, three baby bottles and the 5 lb. jar of grape jelly every two weeks is up to them.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Well then, ... by darkfire5252 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it's a good thing I don't have a cell phone. No cell phone, no tracking. No tracking, no data mining.

      This is possibly the most dangerous attitude for people to have. The 'magic' of data mining is that it relies on probabilities that are learned from populations as a whole. Knowing how millions of people who do have cellphones behave can, and will, give data miners valuable (or dangerous...) insight about how people in general will behave. Don't think for a second that, because you personally do not have a cell phone, you don't stand to lose some privacy with the rest of us.

  8. Re:Anybody knows the details of location measureme by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  9. Re:Anybody knows the details of location measureme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you walk around then your mobile logs at least into one mobile cell. If there are three cells around you then you can do triangulation. There's an open source project that can make use of this data from within your mobile: http://opencellid.org/

  10. FamilyNet customer support by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So, we noticed that you spent an hour at a known brothel today. The good news is we offer our special customers preferential rates for non-geographic billing!"

    1. Re:FamilyNet customer support by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was preaching to them about Jesus! Honest!

    2. Re:FamilyNet customer support by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha, they better be tracking by the minute if they want to catch me that way!

    3. Re:FamilyNet customer support by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was preaching to them about Jesus! Honest!

      Ah, so that's why we heard "Oh, God! YES!!!" over your line...

  11. Blackmail seems an interesting option by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This is anautomated message for Mr Smith. Hello Mr Smith, we've noticed that you've been spending your friday mornings at hotel 6 a lot, and while you commit adultery with Ms. Doolan who also spends a lot of time there with you, you may want to consider taking a short detour to Delco Brand Drugstore for some condoms to avoid your wednesday trips to the free VD clinic!"

  12. Why stop at location? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They can sell information on everyone you called, use speech recognition to monetize the content of your calls. And since you voluntarily brought a phone into your life, why turn off the microphone just because you aren't making a call? Just continuously record everything in the vicinity - there must be a wealth of data there that someone would pay for.

    If data-mining of everything that touches the service works for facebook, why not telcos?

    1. Re:Why stop at location? by ChiRaven · · Score: 2

      In the days of the Bell System, and even afterwards, there was such a thing as "customer proprietary network information." Anything the customer owned, did, or said that touched the telephone network was protected by the strictest privacy protections except to the minimum extent required by the explicit order of a court. Anyone who breached this principle lost thier job, period, dot!

      Somewhere along the line this principle apparently got lost, and our society is much the poorer for it.

    2. Re:Why stop at location? by Phillibuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why turn off the microphone just because you aren't making a call? Just continuously record everything in the vicinity

      They'd never do that, because then they'd have to upgrade their networks... ;)

  13. Beginning? by Chelloveck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beginning to wake up to the idea? I got out of the cellular biz back in '95, and "location based service" was being talked about then. It's hardly a new idea, and it's one the telcos have been drooling over for more than a decade. Maybe they're finally figuring out ways to make it pay off.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  14. Telecom Personal in Argentina by cokegen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm almost every day at my cave programming and that stuff. In 2009 I decided to go to the Rally that took place in Cordoba, Argentina (I'm from the neighboring province Santa Fe) and after I went back I started to get spam SMS's that advertised Rally related stuff. I have Telecom Personal and of course, I can confirm they either sell or use (themselves) my location info to at least try to sell me stuff. I can only assume they actually use location data for that and other "darker" purposes.

  15. Vodafone woke up years ago by Gyske · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TomTom has been using cell phone location data, provided by Vodafone, since 2006 for traffic (congestions and travel times) information. See it at work (for free) here: TomTom HD Traffic

  16. Why stop there? by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Funny

    They can sell information on everyone you called, use speech recognition to monetize the content of your calls. And since you voluntarily brought a phone into your life, why turn off the microphone just because you aren't making a call? Just continuously record everything in the vicinity - there must be a wealth of data there that someone would pay for.

    Why stop there? Most phones these days come with at least one camera, many with two. Activate both, and stream the data back to a data collection point. Do image search and color-gradient analysis, pick out those that indicate some hanky panky, hire some folks in the far east for a dollar a day to comb through the video data and pick out only those streams that show people in a comprimising position, and then monetize in one of the following ways:

    1. Blackmail your victim^H^H^H^H^H customer (a monthly fee not to tell the missus/mister what you've been up to in your cubical at 10pm last night, or to not send your family intimate pics of your honeymoon, etc.)

    2. For those who won't or can't pay, hire another set of people with video editing skills to weave together full length videos of people's intimiate moments, and sell online.

    3. Charge a premium for videos of people who 'live near you'.

    4. Profit!

    Bonus points for those iPhone holding iSlaves ... they can provide the content, but their 'freedom from porn' ensures they can't watch it (at least not on their iShackles).

    I mean, it's not as if we have any real rights anyway, once there's a bottom line to be made, and it isn't like this is any creepier than the 'dead peasants insurance' most of our employers have taken out on us already.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  17. I'm beginning to wake too! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am beginning to see value in turning my phone off and leaving it at home... maybe even turning off service.

    Where are our consumer protection agencies when we need them? At every turn, the people we exchange money with are sharing our personal details for further profit. This should be illegal without compensation. If I am used in generating their content, and to be clear I *AM* being used, then I should get a cut of the profit at the very least and most certainly the ability to opt out with complete confirmation and the ability to sue if they violate that status.

  18. Why can't they use this data fix their coverage? by apenzott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems odd that now that the carriers have GPS coordinates of where their subscribers are using their services, that they seem unwilling to use this data (GPS coordinates and dropped calls) to improve their coverage and services where the customer needs it.

    Oh, that entails spending money rather than making money. (Fail.)

    --
    The Roman Rule: The one who says it cannot be done shall not interrupt the one who is doing it.