Slashdot Mirror


Iron Baby

When Iron Baby wants O's, Iron Baby gets O's.

97 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Lame by pudge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hate things trying to make babies look cute by acting like adults in some ways. This is like the worst commercials ever made -- the etrade commercials -- on crack.

    1. Re:Lame by rwv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is the worst Slashdot story that has be posted to the front page in a long time.

    2. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's essentially the same thing as people who dress up their pets. It only looks amusing to the owners (read: parents) who have an investment in that being.

      On second thought, most dogs are actually far more interesting than a (retarded by comparison) human baby.

    3. Re:Lame by irreverant · · Score: 1

      Logic: Accepted.

      --
      Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Lame by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't really get the idle section. There are tons of good sites for material of this kind. I come to slashdot for the tech stuff and discussions. Also, when using the new index I haven't even found a way to turn the idle section off... just look at the amount of comments on idle stories, can't we just collectively admit this isn't what slashdot is good at at let it die now? ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    5. Re:Lame by KarmaticStylee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really hate babies

    6. Re:Lame by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, if you don't like it, filter it out. It isn't that hard.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    7. Re:Lame by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Normally I have no time for all the cynics who rail on Idle. But for once I have to say that Idle really has hit a new low. I can't condone this tripe on the front page and neither should anyone else.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    8. Re:Lame by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Based on your attitude, I suspect your parents did to~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Lame by Inda · · Score: 1

      So everyone has to take a minute out of their day to block him?

      Wouldn't it be better to not post this crap?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    10. Re:Lame by netsavior · · Score: 3, Informative

      2 seconds out of one day to block all idle for the rest of eternity.
      Click the "edit" icon on the "Idle" section of your sidebar, then click the "hide" button.

    11. Re:Lame by optimus2861 · · Score: 1

      Stories can't be filtered out of the RSS feed, nor can you even tell what section they're under if you're using a Firefox live bookmark.

    12. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's essentially the same thing as people who dress up their pets. It only looks amusing to the owners (read: parents) who have an investment in that being.

      Hey, some of us don't do it to "look amusing". Some of us put a coat on our dog in the winter because we live in the bloody cold north and have a short haired breed that originates in the desert. Some of us put boots on our dog in the winter because otherwise she gets blisters on her paws from walking on the ice (again, we live in the bloody cold north), and besides, we don't want wet paw prints all over the house after she returns from her walk. And some of us put sunglasses on our dog in the summertime because she has a degenerative eye condition that requires UV protection to keep her from going blind.

      The sunglasses in particular cause many people to laugh when we walk past, and for some reason it also causes a few, mostly grumpy old men, to scowl, presumably because they assume we're just trying to be cute. We're not. We'd just rather have a dog who looks silly than a blind dog.

    13. Re:Lame by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      the adblock filter for hiding elements containing the word 'kdawson' is pretty effective

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    14. Re:Lame by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      It takes more time for you to read this reply than it would have taken to filter it.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    15. Re:Lame by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      How? The new style index doesn't seem to care that I have deselected idle.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    16. Re:Lame by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree.

      Possibly the Worst Thing Ever.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    17. Re:Lame by everynerd · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Idle should, by default, never appear in the front page stream.

    18. Re:Lame by rwv · · Score: 1

      I must admit, the editors of Slashdot have done a good job filtering the irrelevant Idle stories from the front page over the last few months. I think maybe 20% of the Idle stories on the front page are actually interesting enough to warrant a click. And I'll even say that it's nice to see "Idle" and know that I can let my brain go on vacation for 15 minutes when one of those stories that piques my interest does come up.

    19. Re:Lame by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      THANKS! :)

      Why that setting has to be different from the way to block idle when using the old style index is beyond me.

      Then again, that's why we have both coders and user interface people where I work... ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    20. Re:Lame by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Better to flame it as it deserves. Filtration isn't feedback.
      BTW:
      Babbys should be poasted on 4chan where they will be respected.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:Lame by couchslug · · Score: 1, Funny
      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    22. Re:Lame by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It's under idle and easy to ignore. BFD.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re:Lame by Degro · · Score: 1

      Yeah really, what happened there? Slashcode needs editor moderation and an editor threshold to filter out this crap...

    24. Re:Lame by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you don't like it, filter it out. It isn't that hard.

      Sorry, but I use the RSS feeds, and I cannot filter the idle stories, and there is no way to differentiate the stories.

    25. Re:Lame by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      As always, you can use yahoo pipes to filter out idle. Or just subscribe to one that someone has already created. Like the one found at http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=527129296c75002203989957b76e87d9

    26. Re:Lame by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I totally agree. Babies aren't cute at all without hand cannons and state of the art metal suits to shoot machine gun wielding bunnies in the third world. Seriously. Who the hell do they think they're fooling?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    27. Re:Lame by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. Yahoo pipes allows you to do such things. Either make your own, or go with a premade one such as the feed found at http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=527129296c75002203989957b76e87d9

    28. Re:Lame by sjames · · Score: 1

      What are you going to do about it then? Send them to bed without their supper? Make them stand in the corner? Perhaps keep them after school?

    29. Re:Lame by pudge · · Score: 1

      Babies doing grown up things are always cute.

      I cannot agree.

      Look at the smash hit "Look Who's Talking."

      I try my best to not. Awful movie.

      That made so much money it pulled John Travolta out of obscurity

      Yes, one of that film's many crimes.

      ... and made Bruce Willis a culture icon.

      No, it didn't.

      Even so, a decent sequal

      ... never existed. A sequel more horrific than the original did happen, though.

      The roller skate commercial for avionics water put to MJ's Billy Jean is already classic.

      "Classic" in the sense of "one of the most awful things ever."

      If everyone else likes it, you don't.

      Nonsense. I like baseball and football. I like the Red Sox and Celtics and Patriots. I like The Beatles. And so on.

      Talking dogs, fish, animals and moons will always be around along with talking babies.

      To the detriment of all humanity.

      Get over it an move on.

      People who dislike things, and say so, will always be around. Get over it and move on and grow up. (Yes, I am pointing out the fact that you are a hypocrite.)

    30. Re:Lame by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      That's strange, because I rarely read anything on idle I don't enjoy or at least find interesting. IMHO Idle's one of the best parts of /.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    31. Re:Lame by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Except filtering it doesn't remove it from our RSS? So yea, I don't like this shit coming up...

    32. Re:Lame by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I really hate things trying to make babies look cute by acting like adults

      This is, presuming your are male, because you have no children of your own. If, amazingly, you do have children, then you are Very Bad Man, who deserves his testicles chopped off.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    33. Re:Lame by pudge · · Score: 1

      You're a sad, sad, person.

    34. Re:Lame by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm a happily married father of 2.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    35. Re:Lame by pudge · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm a happily married father of 2.

      That is, in fact, irrelevant to what I said. Calling someone a "sad, sad person" is not a statement relating to anyone's emotional state.

      However, I will note that if you think making random children act like adults is cute, that makes you even sadder than the fact that you inanely think that anyone else should. There's nothing "cute" about it, especially since -- inevitably -- it is someone trying WAYYYY too hard.

      Kids are cute on their own. They don't need moronic adults screwing it up.

  2. C'mon, kdawson. by Pojut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look. I know this is idle. I'm aware of that. But of all the literally hundreds of awesome stories in the Firehose to put on the front page, you chose this?

    Fail. Epic fucking fail.

    1. Re:C'mon, kdawson. by (startx) · · Score: 4, Informative

      kdawson hasn't posted/promoted a single decent article, ever.

      The solution is to go your preferences, filter by author, and uncheck kdawson. Slashdot looks 1000x better this way.

    2. Re:C'mon, kdawson. by thijsh · · Score: 1

      Thanks, i'll do just that...

    3. Re:C'mon, kdawson. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Fail. Epic fucking fail."

      There is a land past fail, where the failure whose name we dare not speak waits resting, waiting for the end times.
      This thread is but a whisper from that place. Pray more such do not escape.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:C'mon, kdawson. by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I can discern any difference in quality whatsoever between the stuff kdawson posts and the stuff the rest of the "editors" post. Looks like the exact same kind of crap across the board to me.

  3. What's not to like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This.
    Idle.
    kdawson.

  4. Please get rid of this. by snarfies · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have Idle specifically blocked in my preferences. That seems to have ceased to function as of a few months ago, so I blocked all stories by samzenpus. Do I now have to block kdawson as well?

    1. Re:Please get rid of this. by RingDev · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do I now have to block kdawson as well?

      You haven't already?

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Please get rid of this. by nkh · · Score: 1

      I blocked kdawson and idle already, it has not blocked the story in the RSS, I don't know about the front page though.

    3. Re:Please get rid of this. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Do I now have to block kdawson as well?

      Does anyone really have to answer that question? The answer is pretty obvious.

  5. Remove please by dward90 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Idle or not, this is a waste of electrons to include on /.

    --
    My other sig is clever.
  6. I accidently set my settings by Megaweapon · · Score: 4, Funny

    to have /. show only things posted on /. that aren't a complete goddamn waste of time, and it redirected me to "about:blank"

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  7. Whoa, hatefest! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Apparently I'm the only guy on slashdot who likes babies, super heroes, and parodies.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Whoa, hatefest! by jdoverholt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seconded. I love those eTrade commercials, too. They're better than actually having kids because I only have to deal with them for 30 seconds at a time and they're always cracking wise.

    2. Re:Whoa, hatefest! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I love those [redacted] commercials, too.

      Ah! You've been spammed with something similar to this... THERE's your problem. The only regular exposure I have to those ads is you people, propagating their brand capitalization of your own free will. I just lol'd at the terrorist bunnies and thought the production values were sharp without cringing at the memory of spam at the first sign of a CGI'd baby.

      Wait... I thought those television CGI babies talked? I remember that because it annoyed me.

      for 30 seconds at a time and they're always cracking wise.

      Riiiight, that. I'm not a fan of that, I think it's creepy.
      Then again I thought the movie Cars was creepy... who built those machines? And what happened to them?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Whoa, hatefest! by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Nope, you are not. I thought this vid was funny and cute. I would have had him fighting some more realistic villain, such as the ever evil Nanny. Oh and had him getting it on with some milk-a-holic floozy at the beginning of the clip.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    4. Re:Whoa, hatefest! by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Then again I thought the movie Cars was creepy... who built those machines? And what happened to them?

      Obviously they are the descendants of the Autobots a couple millennia after they finally defeated the Decepticons and eliminated the annoying human inhabitants of this planet.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:Whoa, hatefest! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Pretty funny if you ask me. All the others who knock it likely have other issues... like being to hip for the room.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  8. Whoa. Chill out... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    My goodness, the only thing worse than lame articles on /. is the people whose time is way too important to read lame articles, but not, apparently too important to whine about lame articles.

    I liked the video. I thought it was funny. But even if I hadn't, if I took the time to complain about all the things on /., or anywhere else, I thought were pointless, I would have any time to do anything but whine.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  9. What the fuck??? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    What I said in the title, WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!

    1. Re:What the fuck??? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      What I said in the title, WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!

      You see, there is a very popular movie sequel out this summer called Iron Man 2 based on a comic book of the same name. It's about a rich guy who builds a suit that flies and beats up bad guys.

      In an attempt to parody the movie, some people replaced "Man" with "Baby" and made a short clip that resembles the movie in many ways, including the suit and fighting bad guys.

      But with a baby.

      If you are still confused, try google.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  10. Garbage! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I hate this garbage with a passion. I guess I'm supposed to believe it's cute, but it just looks awkward and creepy. A baby is cute because it does baby things, not because it runs around doing things an adult would do. This is even worse than those obnoxious Etrade commercials but admittedly not quite as bad as Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2.

  11. Yummy by Lemental · · Score: 2, Funny

    The slashdotter tears, they are delicious.

  12. It's For the Children? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    This could have been more interesting if it was discussed as to how the movie was made, or a web site on how one could do it themselves? And, I think I'll stay with Ameritrade.

  13. Ultimate weapon? by Megahard · · Score: 1

    Babies don't need to build a suit to unleash the ultimate weapon.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  14. The Worst by KarmaticStylee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really this is the worst thing I've ever seen posted on this site in the over 10 years I've been a daily visitor.

  15. I like it by Pandrake · · Score: 1

    It's funny. Laugh.

  16. Re:Whoa. Chill out... by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    I disagree. Slashdot editors need to be free to try new things, experiment, see what works and what doesn't; however, idle shit needs to stay idle, and if you think the editors have messed up, you should give them the needed feedback.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  17. Sense of humor = 0 by Nitewing98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Geez, you guys are grumpy in the morning. Get a cup of coffee (or stop drinking coffee). This is funny. Anyone that can't see that is suffering from a severe lack of humanity. Hey, IRON BABY! You're welcome to come to my house and take care of that stupid dog next door any time. Rock on!

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

    1. Re:Sense of humor = 0 by rotide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This site isn't about funny video clips someone found. There are tons of sites devoted to compiling funny video clips.

      This "article" was nothing more than kdawson enjoying a video and posting it to the front page. There was no commentary/summary included besides "When Iron Baby wants O's, Iron Baby gets O's.". This tells me nothing about it. This tells me nothing about why it's on the page. I have no information as to why it's _any_ type of "news".

      This front page "article" was nothing more than what I typically find in a humorous work email where a co-worker found a video he thinks I might enjoy.

      Slashdot, last I checked, was about news or something resembling it. It's about intelligent (at least respective to other sites) discussion about the article/summary/information/technology. Slashdot is not about posting a cute video you want to share with people.

      If you want to do that, that's fine, but find a "news" angle with it. Maybe this was made by a college kid with free software. Maybe it's a project to raise awareness about something, I don't know. But if the editor merely wants to post a video with the text "When Iron Baby wants O's, Iron Baby gets O's.", submit it to Ebaumsworld or another "joke" site.

      We're "grumpy" because this was a sheer and utter waste on Slashdot. Ya, Slashdot can be considered a waste of time on someones scale of relevancy to life, I get that. But Slashdot is a site we go to to learn, not have "cute" videos pushed to the front page. The problem is that now we have precedent that a cute enough video with no summary will be front page material. Why not cut to the chase and just have every other "article" be a funny picture, say a lolcat that kdawson found amusing and then later they can put up the video of the redneck rollercoaster because they thought that was hilarious.

      Oh, I found a funny picture on failblog, that should be front page too!

    2. Re:Sense of humor = 0 by lucm · · Score: 1

      > This is funny. Anyone that can't see that is suffering from a severe lack of humanity

      This might be funny to some people, but is really Slashdot the place to post that kind of content?

      There is youtube and the cheezburger network for that.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Sense of humor = 0 by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      This might have been funny. I kept waiting for a punch line that never came. Lose.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    4. Re:Sense of humor = 0 by blai · · Score: 1

      Cute - probs missing out on the funnies

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    5. Re:Sense of humor = 0 by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

      No, you're right, it's not about RANDOM video clips. This, however, involves both comics (a known geek-related item) and some high-tech wizardry (also within geek purview). This isn't "Aunt Linda drops the potato salad." There are relevant aspects to this post that speak for themselves. Seriously, not sure what prompted such a backlash. It's not like /. is going to become YouTube.

      --

      Nitewing '98

      Everything works...in theory.

  18. There is no link, no movie by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    How am I supposed to watch a baby superhero parody without a link? There wasn't even movie or a summary. it's a one sentence page. kdawson needs a severe reprimand. Sic 'im Taco.

    1. Re:There is no link, no movie by hesiod · · Score: 1

      The "Watch Video" link seemed pretty clear to me.

    2. Re:There is no link, no movie by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The "Watch Video" link seemed pretty clear to me.

      Not to me; I'm looking at it from a different computer now, and it still has no "Watch Video" link. FF 3.6.3
      This is what I see:

      Idle: Iron Baby on Friday May 28, @10:51AM
      Posted by kdawson on Friday May 28, @10:51AM
      from the energizer-bunnies-beware dept.

      When Iron Baby wants O's, Iron Baby gets O's.

  19. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 1

    If you don't like it, don't frickin' watch it, and don't whine like little bitches in the comments.

    Back at you: if you don't like our comments, don't read them, and don't whine like a little bitch about them in the comments.

    You'd think you could find a better way to compensate for your shitty lives without dumping on someone who actually has talent.

    You'd think you could find a better way to compensate for your shitty life without dumping on someone who actually has a thoughtful opinion.

    Leave the ansty, I'm-so-cool shit to the emo teenagers. It's getting tired.

    Leave the ansty, I'm-so-cool shit to the emo teenagers. It's getting tired.

  20. Help me out by theorem4 · · Score: 1

    I logged in just for the reason that I want to block kdawson and idle. How can I do this?

    1. Re:Help me out by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      On the main page, top left, there should be a link called "Sections", click on that and you should be able to go from there.

      Or just click on this link
      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=edithome

  21. Baby Haters by happy_place · · Score: 2, Funny

    I see a lot of baby hating going on here. I think it's cuz it reminds slashdotters how babies are made and how they don't do that activity. So chill and remember: The babies of today will bury you tomorrow.

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
  22. TOTALLY not "news for nerds" by v1 · · Score: 1

    and certainly not "stuff that matters"

    But definitely well-done.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  23. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by aicrules · · Score: 1

    And if you don't like his comment about you commetning about not wanting this crap posted, then don't read his comments about you commenting about not wanting this crap posted. And if you don't like me commenting about you commenting about him commenting about you commenting that you don't like this crap being posted on slashdot....then divide by zero

  24. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'M JUST KEEPING IT REAL, YO

  25. Amazing by crf00 · · Score: 1

    The short film is directed by Patrick Boivin, and it seems to have nothing to do with the original movie. It is amazing how a small team can make such high quality film that look almost the same as the real movie.

  26. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by aicrules · · Score: 1

    No joke, keep on keepin it

  27. Kill it with Fire by axl917 · · Score: 1

    eot.

  28. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 1

    Get off your high horse

    You obviously meant to reply to the parent of my comment, since he was the one putting himself above other people. I was merely poiting out his obvious hypocrisy in doing so. Try again!

  29. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 1

    For reals.

  30. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 1

    telling someone to stop polluting the comment section whilst telling someone they don't have to participate is not hypocritical.

    Correct.

    However, telling someone to not whine, while whining; telling them to not watch and comment something they don't like, while reading and commenting on something they don't like; etc. ... that obviously is hypocritical. Let's be adults and not pretend otherwise, mmmmkay?

    if you don't like idle ...

    I never implied, in any way whatsoever, I didn't like idle. Indeed, I read idle often, and thus it is entirely analagous to the comments. I can't know a particular idle story/video/link/etc. will be dumb until I've read/watched it.

    Nor did I even imply I didn't like this particular story. What I said is that I didn't like the movie the story linked to. I think the story is fine, as it gives me the opportunity to say how much I hate the movie.

    The little movie is technically proficient, and of very good quality. But it's DUMB and ANNOYING. Babies doing adult things is stupid. Look Who's Talking is the most evil film of all time because it gave us talking babies and the rebirth of John Travolta.

  31. Good Clean American Fun by aztecmonkey · · Score: 1

    Somebody did this in their spare time? I say pretty impressive, even if it is silly. The comments would probably be more favorable if it was Jedi Baby, or Star Trek Baby.

  32. Re:Whoa. Chill out... by blai · · Score: 1

    Want to try something new?

    Wanna try removing kdawson from slashdot?

    --
    In soviet Russia, God creates you!
  33. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by pudge · · Score: 1

    Wow, you just regurgitated his post back you him. That's bloody brilliant.

    "Brilliant" is the wrong word. "Sufficient" is the correct one.

  34. Iron Baby!! by TechNit · · Score: 1

    Iron Baby yer my hero! Now please go blast my obnoxious neighbors out of the galaxy!! And to all of you whining in the closet rabbit lovers to heck with the lot of ya!! Iron Baby ROX!! LMAO!! Where the hell is yer sense of humor you gaggle of insensitive clods??!!

    --
    Sig?! Sig?! We don't need no stinking sig!!
  35. Production quality by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ok so it IS a joke without a punchline and another weird-baby thing... but this is not a baby's face plastered on existing scenes.

    This is very impressive production quality.

  36. College Project? by dogsolitude_uk · · Score: 1

    Ok, it was clever in a sort of averagey way, not massively funny or amusing. No Iron Nappy being changed or the kid being sick in the suit or anything that would cause it to go viral in the way that bodily fluids do.

    Maybe it was just a part of someone's college project or something.

  37. Patrick Boivin by Taojin · · Score: 1

    Should have known straightaway that this was made by Patrick Boivin, he is quite the artist. Check out his Stopmotion work on Youtube, it's very well done!

  38. Re:Stup The Hell Up, Haters by couchslug · · Score: 1

    If you like that shit go elsewhere to wallow in it. This is a geek site, that bullshit doesn't belong here. Go to Ebaumsworld where you belong.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  39. This video is not available in your country. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    In Germany here is what shows when you try to watch the video: This video is not available in your country.

    I don't think too many proxies would be to happy to have to pump youtube videos through.

    This whole 'you cannot watch it in this country or in that country' is ridiculous.

    1. Re: This video is not available in your country. by justinmbarnes · · Score: 1

      Be thankful that you can't see it...it's not even that funny.

  40. where's the iron by vaporland · · Score: 1

    pampers...?

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!