Slashdot Mirror


Hands-On Demo Shows Asus E-Reader Tablet In Action

MojoKid writes "Mobile computing is making its mark at Computex 2010, with tablet PCs and e-readers of all sorts coming out for the first time as rivals to Apple's iPad. After announcing its Eee Pad tablet PC, Asus offered some hands-on time with its new e-Reader/e-Writer, designed for students and mobile business professionals. The little slate's features include 10-hour battery life, 2,450 dpi resolution touch screen, pen writing and input controls, 2MP camera, USB port, and a MicroSD slot. In addition, Asus also has strong ties with Amazon, so it wouldn't be a reach to see some sort of partnership between Asus and Amazon with the Kindle bookstore as a content provider."

24 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Clarification: by ThoughtMonster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The screen does *not* have a 2450dpi resolution (which would be ridiculous). The dpi metric refers to the input sensitivity. The screen is a 8" 1024x600 panel.

    The panel is obviously not e-ink...is this old school monochrome LCD, then? If the viewing angles are OK, I don't see why not.

    1. Re:Clarification: by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The panel is obviously not e-ink...is this old school monochrome LCD, then? If the viewing angles are OK, I don't see why not.

      There are some LCDs that are non-backlit, but are very contrasty with very nice viewing angles available. The Aluratek Librie e-reader's a cheap ($120-ish) version of that whose screen is almost like e-Ink, and very, very nice. Probably active-matrix panels to avoid all the nasty ghosting monochrome panels of old are. I used one and I didn't realize it was LCD - I just thought it was quite responsive, then saw it was actually an LCD.

      Alas, it's major setback is the cheap plasticky feel, the sharp "I'm high tech" edges and ridges, and positively lousy looking and feeling firmware. (And that's a major setback of all these devices is crappy-ass firmware...).

    2. Re:Clarification: by thijsh · · Score: 2, Informative

      The GP pointed out this is not about resolution, but about touch sensitivity... I have not read anything about the iPad having a great DPI, it's just regular fat finger touchscreen technology for as far as I know, which should equate to roughly 130 DPI. That would make this tablets almost 20 times more sensitive and much more suitable for drawing...

    3. Re:Clarification: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that if they had a Pixel Qi screen, they'd just say so. And of course it would also support color.

      As it is, it really looks just like a monochrome LCD. Which, in this case, means an epic fail.

  2. Does it run Linux? by LinuxAndLube · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does it?

    1. Re:Does it run Linux? by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait for it, in 3... 2... 1... Now it does! :)

  3. 2450 dpi PEN resolution by irp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The digitizer has 2450 dpi resolution. The screen is 1024x786 with 64 grey levels.

    It look like a concept I could use. For lab journals etc - snap an image, write a note.

  4. Wishlist by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I would like is to use such a thing as a terminal. Use it as a screen / digitizer combination at work or at home, and to be able to use it as a separate PC when on the train. As I don't do no flash, I cannot see what OS it has and if software can be installed on it, but it could make a great, finally ergonomic, X terminal.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Wishlist by radtea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I would like is to use such a thing to read books that I own, not DRM-krippled rental boks that Amazon foists on Kindle users.

      Until then, no thanks. I've got books on my shelves that are over 100 years old, and I can still read them, although the publisher, printer and distributer have all long-since gone out of business. I've got books I bought 20 years ago, and I can still read them.

      There's no commitment, and no possibility of commitment, from Amazon or any of the other DRM-krippled e-bok vendors that I will be able to read their rental boks tomorrow, much less twenty years from now.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:Wishlist by gknoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you considered transcribing or digitizing those hundred-year-old books for Project Gutenberg, so that we can read them too? I haven't looked up what formats they're interested in, and I don't know how you'd do it without either being labor-intensive or destructive, but if you were willing, I bet the Project would benefit from it.

  5. Not released and already an epic fail... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Give me 8.5" by 11" or A4 size screen with the resolution to replicate a FULL PAGE OF TEXT.

    Why cant these tablet makers get it through their heads? 1200X600 = too small I want to see a full page and annotate it. Otherwise it is another leisure toy and not a real tool for education or work.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Not released and already an epic fail... by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Give me 8.5" by 11" or A4 size screen with the resolution to replicate a FULL PAGE OF TEXT.

      Why cant these tablet makers get it through their heads? 1200X600 = too small I want to see a full page and annotate it. Otherwise it is another leisure toy and not a real tool for education or work.

      While I can see how this might be useful for a copy-editor or similar, why is this going to matter for the rest of us?

      Print is dying, my friend. Soon (if not already) everything important will come in a digital format as well as a printed one, and the application doing the printing will be expected to resize and adjust so things look good once printed.

      The demo illustrated one of the key features as to why this is the case - adjustable fonts. Can't do that once it has been printed out...

  6. Re:color? by Albanach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Normally, the display is gray scale because an e-ink display is used which causes less of a draw on power and extends out the battery life to a week. I'm guessing that the 10-our battery life is a conservative estimate. Otherwise your standard eee-pc/iPad clone outperforms such a device because they're color, available now at 300$, and last up to 10 hours.

    The specs make this look like a note taking / annotation device. That's something the kindle sucks at. Jobs won't allow a stylus near the iPad, so they're avoiding that market altogether. Netbooks are fine for typists as long as your notes are all text. As soon as diagrams are involved they suck too.

    So really this is a $$$ replacement for a pad of lined paper. That said, if the applications are well put together, it might well have a market even if that market doesn't include you or me.

  7. Re:Digicam? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I take you think it was a mistake to offer, for almost 3 decades now, color video in cameras with electronic (and typically b&w) viewfinders? Same with many bridge digicams...I guess they should revert to making b&w pictures when using their built-in electronic viewfinder.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  8. Is it just me? by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I out of line by whining that we all should be well over the use of monochrome displays in these devices? When I see an eReader using a monochrome display I think "that looks so last decade...", and the strange thing to me is that it takes Apple and its iPad to deliver full color output? Like its some huge friggin' technological effort to create a tablet device with color; so they get to charge almost $1000 a pop? I don't get it. Am I missing the incredible technological leap that has been made with the iPad?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    1. Re:Is it just me? by Draek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I out of line by whining that we all should be well over the use of monochrome displays in these devices?

      Well, yeah.

      When I see an eReader using a monochrome display I think "that looks so last decade..."

      What matters isn't how something looks, but how it works and, unless you're interested in photographs and videos (ie, not in the target market for this device) monochrome works perfectly fine as it is. Plus if it reduces costs so much that they can sell it for only $199, I'm all for it.

      and the strange thing to me is that it takes Apple and its iPad to deliver full color output?

      No, we've had color tablets for *years*, Apple's only "invention" was giving theirs a sane price.

      At first I was fairly skeptical of this eee-Pad or whatever, I thought it was gonna be little more than an iPad clone with the Apple logo switched by an Asus one, and retail for about as much. But this actually looks like an interesting device, not one aimed at the "rich hipster" who wants to watch Blu-Ray movies on his living room, but one aimed at students and workers which likely thought about getting a Tablet PC to do their work, but found the iPad too limited and the others too expensive.

      Monochrome? so are my notes. Small? so much the better. Camera on the back? I'm not interested in chatting up with it, I want it to document stuff. And to top it off it's only $199. Just genius.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    2. Re:Is it just me? by bendodge · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, we're all missing the incredible technological leap in battery density and/or screen power consumption. Color screens take too much power or cost too much. Ever held an iPad? It's HEAVY. But hope is not dead: Qualcomm says they will ship a full-color, video-capable e-ink device this year.

      By the way, my brother is an absolute eReader fanatic and has specs of almost every eReader imaginable: http://ereaders.bsgprogrammers.com/

      --
      The government can't save you.
    3. Re:Is it just me? by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are huge benefits to using E-ink for a reader over a traditional screen (battery life, eye-strain), and right now E-ink is essentially limited to monochrome. Add to that the fact that most books are just black text on white and it becomes more of a balanced trade-off than you make it sound. The iPad is a web/video browsing device that also happens to show books, so clearly monochrome would be out of the question.

    4. Re:Is it just me? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plenty of other companies do colour tablets. Have been since XP Tablet Edition almost a decade ago. The issue is that they're power-hungry and they cause eyestrain because you're basically staring at the backlight when you're reading off them. Monochrome reflective displays, often as E-ink, are favoured for "readers" because you're only getting ambient light and they run for a long time. Apple's made a judgement call and decided that long-term reading isn't used enough to justify hobbling a whole tablet to accomodate it. For battery life, they've just put a really fucking huge battery in there.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  9. Re:Digicam? by cwgmpls · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do IT support in public schools in a major U.S. city. We have neither white nor black boards these days. All teachers now are using LCD projectors to display content that comes either from a PC or from a "document camera" -- a video camera aimed at a plain piece of paper. In addition, many teachers are using interactive whiteboards which digitize content as you write it on the board

    So there is little reason for a student to take a snapshot in class -- everything is already digitized as it is displayed by the teacher, and the teacher can easily post all content on a website after class.

  10. Re:color? by bodland · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Without color this device simply will not attract the "note takers"..." who is the biggest market segment of "note takers" who adopt new devices quickly?

    College students. Ever seen a young person react to monochrome display...?? "Yucky" pretty much sums it up.

    I think it is important to realize that tablet devices are going move quickly beyond the static brick...flexible displays will allow a thin device that has all the characteristics and user experience of a magazine with moving pictures and internet access. Text books, magazines, video, personal apps, media...will all converge...onto one device. Even note taking...

    Why would anyone make a device that dumps itself into a tiny niche market?? The real driving factor that people seem to miss is content. What kind of content does a person want monochrome displays for? Mass Media market content is in color. Digital content cannot be free any longer and the publisher's are all lining up to make sure of it. Mark these words:

    Publisher's are working very hard to reduce the largest expense they have....an expense that drives advertising costs sky high. Printing and paper. Drastically reduce those two things and make money distributing content to mobile multi-function devices...is where publisher's are all going.

  11. Re:color? by Drathus · · Score: 2, Informative

    He says in the video it's a TFT-LCD. Just grayscale and not backlit. Hence the 10 hour life.

    Not eInk. No interest from me in using it as a reader, or much of anything else I guess.

  12. Excuse me?! by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am one of the "note takers," essentially a professional one. I don't use color. I don't WANT color. Color destroys readability.

    Right now I use a LiveScribe Pulse pen.

    1) No immediate feedback.
    2) Clumsy applications.
    3) Limited memory.
    4) Must be synchronized to a PC.
    5) No close handwriting recognition integration.
    6) VERY limited user interface.

    I would LOVE to be using a tablet of some kind so that I can actually see what I'm doing. So why am I using an ink-based pen? Because there is NO alternative for taking many hours worth of handwritten notes on battery power with very low weight right now. Back in the day there was the Newton 2x00 and it was, so far as I'm concerned, the Greatest Device Ever Created for my purposes and I would still be using it (I have three, two were backups) if not for the fact that the NCU (sync software) wasn't updated beyond Windows 95 / Mac OS 8 compatibility, so synchronizing is now impossible.

    For a good 10 years I've been crossing my fingers hoping against hope that someone would come up with a Newton-like replacement: similar form factor, similar display, similar high-resolution stylus-based digitizer, etc. This looks damned close in terms of size and input method.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Excuse me?! by UBfusion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever tried to sync the Newton in a Win95 Virtual Machine? I use VMs a lot for old hardware (cameras, scanners, phones, music players) and in 90% of the cases it works.