Slashdot Mirror


Study Finds That "Extreme Gamers" Play 48 Hours a Week

An anonymous reader writes "Think you're a big gamer? According to a new study from market research firm NPD Group, to be considered among the real hardcore you'll need to play an average of 48.5 hours a week — nearly seven hours a day. This group of gamers is, on average, '29 years old, and — perhaps surprisingly — one-third of them are female. They're more likely to play on consoles than on the PC, and on average they've purchased 24 titles in the past three months — a bill that could easily run over a thousand dollars. But dedicated though they may be, the Extreme Gamers are just a small minority: a mere 4% of the US's 174-million-strong gaming public. '"

272 comments

  1. Pfft by kiwizoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Amateurs.

    1. Re:Pfft by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Indeed. 48 hours a week? That's almost like you're just playing games for fun in your spare time. *Truly* extreme gamers get a second PC so they can do 48 hours in a single day.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favourite part of /.? Watching a sarcastic comment like that yield an entire chain of comments explaining how the replying authors are subject-matter experts and should not be called amateurs.

      It's the weirdest reverse-trolling I've ever seen.

  2. 24 games in the past 3 months? by CMontgomery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There haven't been 24 games released in the past 3 months worth playing for 7 hours. Let alone 7 hours a day.

    1. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Apparently a ton of people disagree with you.

    2. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you like using logical fallacies.

    3. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by skine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently several tons of people disagree with you.

      FTFY

    4. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      What logical fallacy? Pointing out that his personal opinion doesn't necessarily hold for the rest of the world?

    5. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. It could be that they play a few titles 30 hours a week, and go through 24 other titles quickly and get bored of them.

      Who buys 8 games a month anyway? I wonder if they just asked how many new games they played and assumed they bought them.

    6. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're arguing from popularity, perceived or real. Popularity proves nothing.

      I agree with him. Most games these days are unimaginative borefests, full of monster-closets and 'adventure' that is almost as bad as those old laserdisc games. In the fighting/racing/fps genres, the skill quotient required to play seems to drop with each new iteration of a given series. This is the one thing that kept me coming back for more. It's too bad really. Just because a game has more buyers/players does not make it automatically 'better' for the genre it inhabits. The only winners in this era are the businessmen who probably don't even play games much.

    7. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You're arguing that there's some arbitrary, objective definition of 'quality' of a game, as distinct from how well liked, how playable and how fun games are? More specifically, you're arguing that there's some objective definition of 'quality' that coincides with your (and CMontgomery's) personal tastes in games.

      I could get all logical but instead I'll merely say "you're wrong."

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    8. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      No, if you read the summary these people make up less than 4% of the gaming population. Sounds more like a small minority than a "ton of people".

      Unless you literally meant 2000 lbs of people, which in the case of those playing more than 47 hours a week doesn't add up to very many.

    9. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative

      There haven't been 24 games released in the past 3 months worth playing for 7 hours. Let alone 7 hours a day.

      So what? There are countless old games still worth playing. Get yourself some emulators, a bunch of fullsets, and a decent USB controller -- you'll get years of gaming right there.

    10. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by spruce · · Score: 1

      Apparently several tons of people disagree with you.

      FTFY

      Both of them?

    11. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by pcolaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well played, but I counter with the unbeatable "Your mom"

    12. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not arguing that at all. I argued that the rationale for your opinion was flawed. There's no reason to state 'something is x because lots of people think so' unless that's your rationale. That statement WAS objective in nature.

      It also sounded like you wanted clarification on my position, so I gave it. Two separate threads. Yes, it's subjective. Your reply to him was still badly reasoned.

      'night

    13. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Snap. You got me there.

      Amusingly, at a party recently, we decided that the only way to top the traditional exchange was Chuck Norris:
      A: blah blah
      B: no you
      A: your mum
      B: your face
      A: your mum's face
      B: Chuck Norris
      A: ...

      Sadly that resulted in a round of "chuck norris's mum", "your mum with chuck norris", "your face with your mum" etc. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    14. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4% of the 174 million people. That is still some 7E6 people, just in the USA!

    15. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      While that's an opinion, and as others have pointed out, a highly subjective one, you're missing some points.

      1) You don't have play all of them for 7 hours, let alone 7 hours a day. If you buy 24 games, it's entirely possible that half or more of them will be played for less than 7 hours, and you could just play the best ones a lot. I know several people that buy all kinds of hype, will get games on launch day, not like them, and trade them in a few days later. These games probably don't get more than a few hours play, but other games in their library do.

      2) You're also assuming that the 24 games purchased in the last three months were recently released, new titles. I still purchase NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, and classic PC games on a regular basis. I'm sure I'm not alone in seeing a game that I always wanted to play, but never got around to, and picking it up when I have the chance.

      Sadly, I don't have the time to play that many hours a day to dedicate to games, so many of the games I buy wind up collecting dust. Some day, though...

    16. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be surprised but there are actually more games than those few released by corporations like EA, Ubisoft, Activision and other "high-quality" (could write that with a straight face) publishers.

      Hell, look at casual PC games, some portals release a new title every day, thats 90 titles in 3 months.

      There's alot going on if you look beyond your own nose ;)

    17. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a lively party.

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    18. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      Apparently a ton of people disagree with you.

      Yeah, the whole *4*% of all gamers.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    19. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article speaks of console gamers. What other group of gamers possess such a skewed sense of value?

    20. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      And you are arguing that logical fallacy definitions can be applied to opinions. If you want to get pedantic, "A ton of people disagree with you." if you assume the average male gamer weighs 200 pounds (a generous estimate) then it only takes ten people who have believed there are 24 games made in the past year for this to be factually correct.

      Either way, the first poster was stating an opinion on the quality of games, the next was stating an observation that others hold a different opinion. I'm afraid you are on the wrong side of this argument AC.

    21. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      So what?

      So it clashes with the notion that those gamers bought an average of 24 games over the last 3 months (and presumably played those games)

    22. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Blur is quite addicting.. Mariokart meets Forza..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid he is not. "Successful" games make a lot of money. "Good" games are a great example of the artistic merit of games. They are sometimes but not always the same thing.

      Are you familiar with the term "Lowest common denominator"?

    24. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      If by "a ton" you mean 4% of US gamers.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    25. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Not sure how the Forza comparison comes in, since there's nothing simulation-like at all about Blur.

      More like Mario Kart meets Burnout. Not a bad thing, but more accurate.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    26. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      While that's an opinion, and as others have pointed out, a highly subjective one, you're missing some points.

      1) You don't have play all of them for 7 hours, let alone 7 hours a day. If you buy 24 games, it's entirely possible that half or more of them will be played for less than 7 hours, and you could just play the best ones a lot. I know several people that buy all kinds of hype, will get games on launch day, not like them, and trade them in a few days later. These games probably don't get more than a few hours play, but other games in their library do.

      Actually, I would guess that for these players, >90% of their time is spent on one game for months at a time. These are the people who grind it out on a single game for sometimes a year at a time. Counter Strike, Halo, WoW, CoD, etc. There only needs to be one multiplayer game in the last several years which is rewarding for high-level skilled players.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    27. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There haven't been 24 games released in the past 3 months worth playing for 7 hours. Let alone 7 hours a day.

      Don't you get it? This "study" was done by "market research firm" the "NPD Group".

      You've got a marketing outfit that works for the game industry coming out with this study, which I'm sure was done under the most rigorous standards of scientific research, claiming that to be a "real" "hardcore" gamer, you have to play 48 hours a week, PLUS you have to spend over a THOUSAND DOLLARS every few months on new games.

      It would be like a company that works for Nike and Gatorade coming out with a study that says to be a real basketball player, you have to buy a new pair of shoes every week and drink 19 bottles of colored water every day.

      Notice that this "study" was reported via a "press release" to geek blogs and news aggregators. These fucking marketing dudes can play us like violins.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Only if you assume that the 24 games bought over a 3 month period were also released in that 3 month period.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    29. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      7 million people isn't a "ton of people" to you?

      If you are still being literal, I guess you must weigh very very little.

      If you drop the literal thing, then what words are acceptable to you for a 7 million member group of people?

    30. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I bet half of those people are playing nothing but WoW.

      I personally spend maybe 15-25 hrs/week playing games, and the only game released in 2010 that I've spent more than a couple hours on is the PC version of Toki Tori. And I don't even play MMOs.

    31. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is something like 0.7 metric megaton of people!

    32. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm cutting down... buying like no more than 4 games a month but I bought something like 12 games this month. Mostly for the PSP when I was going home over the holiday weekend. I have alot of games I have never even opened. I own but still haven't opened Mass Effect 2. I try to find games that hook me and I'll occasionally buy lesser known titles since they'll hook me every once in a while. I have 3 unopened PS3 games that I plan on playing soon, but Just Cause 2 has grabbed me and I've been playing that for my 40+ hours a week.

      But yeah... I don't always buy 24 games in three months, but I've done that more than once.

      Oh and none of this counts casual games that are like $10 bought online.

    33. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by Bungie · · Score: 1

      Who buys 8 games a month anyway?

      The pawn shops around here also sell PS2 and origional XBOX games for $2-4 each. When I first discovered that they were so cheap, I would go there every week and just buy $20 worth of games (whatever looked interesting). I ended up with a large collection of PS2 games very quickly (more than I think I'll ever play within my lifetime). I was buying over 20 games a month, while I only had an hour or two at most every day to play them. I haven't even had a chance to try a lot of them!

      I think the main reason people are buying more games is because there are so many available now for cheap prices.

      When I was a kid, Nintendo games were were considered expensive (I think they were like $70 or $80 each). Most of the people I knew with Nintendos only had a few games, and you would play them all completely through (even if they were boring) because you wouldn't be getting another game for a while. Nowadays there are brand new PSP titles sold at Wal-Mart for $10 or $20.

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
    34. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Not as lively as the next one I went to. Let's just say I found out my wife is bi and, erm, we now have a girlfriend...

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    35. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by AtomicOrange · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure of whether I'm supposed to applaud you or mourn your inevitable severed relationship ending with your wife finding out she's really just a lesbian. Power to you though, likely fun while it lasts. I would venture nearly all of /. is pulling for you... or at least pulling something thinking about what you have.

      I think I've already taken this farther than I intended...

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    36. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I dunno...I think the logical fallacy is clear. TFA doesn't say hardcore gamers can only buy new releases. I could buy 24 great games a DAY if I go back to 1982.

    37. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      And you are arguing that logical fallacy definitions can be applied to opinions.

      That's the entire point of logical fallacies--they point out the error in the logic of people's OPINIONS. Opinions are flawed because people can't see their own fallacies. That's how they are different from facts.

      The logical fallacy in point here is that somebody is claiming "something is X because a lot of people think so"-- argumentum ad populum. Because a lot of people think something is true, doesn't make it true.

    38. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I wish more people in the world understood this sentiment.

      Things that make a lot of money are not necessarily good (blockbuster movies, stars who are famous for being famous, bubble-gum pop singers, Microsoft software, etc. etc.).

    39. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

      Is your girlfriend hot?

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    40. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping that doesn't come back to bite you in the ass, mate.

    41. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      It's not art if nobody likes it. It's DEFINITELY not art if nobody even gives a crap.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    42. Re:24 games in the past 3 months? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      There's an entire segment of society that would disagree with that statement. They are called Fusion Musicians. ;-)

  3. $1000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm not a hardcore player, but I play League of Legends for about 3-4 hours a day every day. It cost me... nothing. The game is free. Don't waste your money on any games this year, just get on my level and LoL.

    www.leagueoflegends.com

    1. Re:$1000? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I'm not a hardcore player

      Indeed, I have not played a game in 3 days.

      They say the shakes only last 48 hours, I was done in 36. Now I feel cold.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:$1000? by jedrek · · Score: 1

      I'm not a hardcore player, but I play League of Legends for about 3-4 hours a day every day.

      How the hell can you do anything other than work or sleep for 21-28h/week and not think you're doing it "hardcore".

    3. Re:$1000? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I'm not a hardcore player, but I play League of Legends for about 3-4 hours a day every day. It cost me... nothing. The game is free. Don't waste your money on any games this year, just get on my level and LoL.

      It costs you 3-4 hours a day. Unless time is value-less to you, the game is hardly "free".

    4. Re:$1000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also had good luck finding free games. This isoHunt site that I found has tons of them!

    5. Re:$1000? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      According to this http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/24/business/fi-tvwatching24, which cites a Nielsen report saying that the average American watches about 5 hours/day of TV. That's larger than your stated count, but it's 'average', so by definition not "hardcore".

  4. 3 Letters by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    WoW

    Though I honestly don't know how this correlates with the finding that it's more consoles than PC gamers. But that could explain how they can play 24 games for about 600 hours (which means about 25 hours per game).

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:3 Letters by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      It can't be WoW since the study found that consoles dominate among such players.

      I usually make sarcastic remark that consoles would always win PCs in time spent playing metric, because in a usual console game one spends disproportional amount of time watching cut-scenes and flashy move animations or simply getting from A to B.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    2. Re:3 Letters by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...one spends disproportional amount of time watching cut-scenes and flashy move animations or simply getting from A to B

      Well, seeing how you also mention WoW... ;p

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  5. 48 hours? by santax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pff sissies, I play that every day.

    1. Re:48 hours? by Velorium · · Score: 2, Funny

      Love the informative rating on this.

    2. Re:48 hours? by dreamer.redeemer · · Score: 1

      "New Study Declares 'Uber Ultra Extreme' Gamers Play 48 Hours a Day"

      --
      the most powerful intellect is that unbounded by indubitable preconception
    3. Re:48 hours? by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      They do. They play 2 games at once.

    4. Re:48 hours? by pcolaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only Chuck Norris and Jack Bauer could play 48 hours a day. I hear that Jack Bauer plays 24 48 hours a day. Too bad it was a shitty game.

    5. Re:48 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be more funny

    6. Re:48 hours? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Jack Bauer makes 24 hours draw out into 1/2 a year

    7. Re:48 hours? by f3rret · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your time warping skills are impressive, do you give lessons?

      I've tried drinking a lot of red bull but I still have not been able to bend the very fabric of time to my will and it saddens me.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    8. Re:48 hours? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Me too. Then I sometimes put in Another 48 Hours and watch it too, even though it's not as good as the first one.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:48 hours? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      But in such wonderful fashion. Although I have to say, never have I become more hateful towards the TV than when the clock ticks towards the end of an hour, leaving me in suspenseful disbelief.

    10. Re:48 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I tell my friends, there is 24 hours in a day, and if thats not enough, there is always night!

  6. I have few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a few friends that play games this much. On consoles. The thing is, however, that it doesnt make them good. Console players IME tend to have a lot less 'skill'; ie- twitch reflexes and battlefield awareness.

    Moral of the story, play PC games if you want to have a challenge. Consoles are fun if you like games with stories.

    1. Re:I have few friends by snowboardin159 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I totally forgo to log in for this post, can a mod edit it? Otherwise ^^ thats my post

    2. Re:I have few friends by mirix · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:I have few friends by Velorium · · Score: 1

      His account number reflects this; as does yours.

    4. Re:I have few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read the title and ignored everything in your post and let me say this.

      0 isn't few, it's none.

    5. Re:I have few friends by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story, play PC games if you want to have a challenge. Consoles are fun if you like games with stories.

      Unless you count emulators, no. Consoles get more arcade ports, and the true challenge is there. Now, here's a test: go play Ikaruga, and don't say a thing about challenging games again until you one-credit it. ;-)

    6. Re:I have few friends by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story, play PC games if you like games. Consoles if you dont.

      TFTFY

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:I have few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_Cherry_Blossom

      Yeah, you really need to shut the fuck up now.

    8. Re:I have few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of games on consoles that demand a very high skill level - Beat em ups, SHMUPs, Puzzlers, Racers...

      The greatest fallacy of all is the constant comparison of PC vs. Console gaming skills.
        If you compare console players within the realm of Console games only, i think your friends would score higher on the "skill scale".
      You seem to be referring mostly to FPS (on PC), which demands a skill set of knowing the map, managing available resources and leashing your enemy. Upon conflict, you need a steady hand and at most one or two quick and precise mouse movements for the kill.
      On Beat em ups for instance (which are traditionally console domain) the skill set looks completely different: Managing range, knowing your moves and be able to execute them consistently, Boosting your meters, finding openings to attack, reacting fast to escape a combo and reading the enemies behaviour.

      See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7cW2nMf1gk
      Countering every beat of a multi hit combo and then moving in for the kill in this case means 5 seconds of buttonpresses that are a) correctly positioned and b) timed within 200ms EACH.
      So comparing PC-skillsets to console skillsets is moot. And the old FPS on a PC vs. FPS on a console discussion is a horse beaten to death. Everyone knows that FPS on consoles are a compromise (Except some titles that were made for consoles from the ground up like Gears of war that removes the twitchfest and relies more on tactics).

      Also, PC games also have great stories. You just have to look outside FPS.

    9. Re:I have few friends by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have a few friends that play games this much. On consoles. The thing is, however, that it doesnt make them good. Console players IME tend to have a lot less 'skill'; ie- twitch reflexes and battlefield awareness.

      Moral of the story, play PC games if you want to have a challenge. Consoles are fun if you like games with stories.


      Have you ever actually played on a console before? Fighting games like Street Fighter and arcade shooters like Mutant Storm Reloaded depend entirely on having good twitch reflexes.

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    10. Re:I have few friends by h4x0t · · Score: 1

      I know you dont have a lot of friends, but why you gotta pick on people who can't defend themselves?

    11. Re:I have few friends by Bungie · · Score: 1

      It's not that they're lacking skills like twich reflexes or battlefield awareness. It's mainly because the console doesn't have a mouse. In FPS games for example, the mouse lets you look around, change direction and lock onto a target with a simple movement of your hand. A console requires multiple button presses or using the analog stick until things line up correctly. Anyone with a mouse is going to take take people to school in if their opponents are using a game controller or keyboard only in an FPS. It's not because you have more skill, it's just because they don't have the best tool for the job. Just like anyone using the keyboard and mouse in a fighting game like Soul Caliber will get taken to school by a console's controller, which is much better for quick, successive, button combinations.

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
  7. I know it's silly to ask, but... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    ...can they keep a job? And maybe even have a life outside the computer?

    48 hours a week is about what I work (ok, it's usually a bit more, but not really much). And considering how I usually do NOT have another 8 hours per day left to play games (even I tend to sleep, eat and move about from time to time), where do you squeeze those 48 hours in when you try to keep a job?

    A week has 168 hours (which is, coincidentally, also about as much time as you work per month on a full time job. Think about it...). Now, I tend to sleep 6-8 hours a night. Preferably more. If you do that, then say good bye either to your job, your life or your gaming habit.

    So what do they give up for gaming? Life, job or sleep?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by HBoar · · Score: 2, Informative

      8 hours work, 8 hours gaming, 6 hours sleep (many could live on much less) leaving two hours for other stuff -- plenty of time. Remember that you can eat while working and playing games.

    2. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by jack2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sleep mostly, hardcore gamers can have a life, i know amazing. But yeah. Sleep usually gets the axe. After a while you learn and adapt. Not before long you move through life in a sort of haze between sleep and being awake. You learn to control your body's urges and can keep awake for as much as you want or fall asleep on the spot.

    3. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      168 - 48 (work) = 120 - (8 hours * 7 days) (sleep) = 64 - 48 (gaming) = 16 hours for life

      16 hours of life around slashdot crowds is something to brag about.

    4. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by snowboardin159 · · Score: 0

      Many people who play that many hours a day work a part time job, and can survive doing that because they save all their money by not doing anything but playing video games. I really think the stat of $1000 in games isnt accurate. As many /.ers have noted, there are not that many good video games in the last 3 months to play anyways. +gamefly is pretty nifty way to go through many different games, if you can sit and beat a game every other day or so.

    5. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by andolyne · · Score: 1

      It's likely the weekends you're forgetting.

      When my wife is away on the weekend and i've got nothing else to do (read: friends are busy), I could easily do 10-15 hours a day. Then that just leaves 3-4 hours a night during the week.

      Normally, though, it's not that much... and it takes an mmo for me to have that much interest in a game - most other games I'm "finished" in 20 hours and bored.

    6. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by pjtp · · Score: 1

      Yes, I try to get in the odd micronap during cut-scenes; however, I'm waiting for the day when I can shut-down parts of my brain while gaming, similar to whales and dolphins. I've already mastered this at work.

    7. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Just figure the weekend 2x15 hours, and that means only 18 hours to disperse among the week 3.5 hours at the end of the day. It's doable although I wouldn't want to sit there and be the one doing it.

      OTOH, I can see a lot more people doing the internet for more than 48 hours a week, and wasting job hours at it. It's a bit harder to play actual games on the job, unless you're a game programmer or something (not their own games, more like WoW or Starcraft or something).

    8. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Therilith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What exactly do you mean by life?

      A hobby?
      Social interaction?

      As sad as it might seem to some, not everybody needs to spend several hours/evenings every week with friends "down at the pub" or whatever the kids are calling it these days.

    9. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like my life when I watched all of BSG in a month...

    10. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Hah, I used to work a job doing tech support where I'd play my PSP while assisting customers with their net problems. Seriously, Disgaea helped me get through some of the more painful days.

    11. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I had a job where I worked at a call center doing tech support. Played PSP (especially turned based strategy games like FFT and Disgaea while on calls helping people fix their net problems. Was hilarious because not only did managers know about it, but as long as you did your job, they didn't even mind it.

    12. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by mjwx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...can they keep a job?

      Yes, this is how I can afford to be a PC gamer. I work 9 hours a day, another 1.5 hours traveling, I play between 4 and 1 hours a night depending on what else I have on (guitar practice, gym, pub). On the Weekends I can play up to 14 hours a day between other things (meals, going out, shopping, etc...). I normally get 6-8 hours a day of sleep unless a new CIV has been released in the previous 2 months.

      And maybe even have a life outside the computer?

      Currently posting from Thailand, 6000 KMs from my gaming boxen and most of my games. I will spend this time drinking, eating, carousing and other stuff one does on holiday. I'll be here for another 3 weeks. My laptop is really just for banking and browing the web, it has an Intel IGM so it wont play any recent games (cant even handle CIV).

      So what do they give up for gaming? Life, job or sleep?

      Many people find a balance. Someone who spends 4 hours gaming per night is no different to those who spend 4 hours watching TV, playing cards or working on their car.

      I dont watch TV so this may be where I'm getting all this time from.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering one can watch 2 to 4 episodes an hour (depending on playback speed),
      how did it take you that long to watch 'em - unless you just watched one season per weekend ?

    14. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its like tv time. 6 pm to 12 pm with dinner.
      If work is local call it 5.30 to 12 pm with dinner and a few breaks? Get up a ~7 am, 1 hours play, at work by 9 am bright and happy with ~6-8h sleep

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      Right now I'm in that 4% of gamers. I'm new to the US, I got my green card not too long ago, and right now I'm just a "housewife" that cooks and play games around 50 hours a week, because is hard for me to get a job without a car. My husband really doesn't care if I play all the time as long as I'm happy doing it. I think I won the jackpot by marrying him haha.

      I used to play WoW all the time. And I was in the top alliance guild of my server, so I was raiding hardcore. But I quit because the guild master was making my life impossible and took all the fun from the game. So right now I'm not even playing wow besides doing arena with my partners. But I'm waiting on the xpac. And I'm catching up with playing a lot of games that I skipped because of WoW.

      Well, I got a little sidetracked. What I really wanted to say is, that there are circumstances in one's life that allow this to happen. I'm right in the average (I'm 29 years old). I'm one of the 1/3 of females that play. I went to college and I have my degree, so that part of my life is at least covered. All I need is a job now. But till then, I'll keep playing games.

    16. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was one of those gamers, and it's easy. I was a WoW addict. My day was something like this:

      6:00am get up, quick shower (sometimes) and get dressed. , Play WoW till 8:00, eat breakfast whilst doing dailys
      8:00 go to work
      18:00 arrive home and log on to wow
      01:00 go to bed. I was eating and drinking whilst playing wow.

      That's 9 hours on a weekday.

      Staurdays I would wake at 6:00am and game till 1 or 2am - 18 hours at least right there
      Sundays wake 6:00am 2 hours on WoW, then family stuff till 14:00, then 14:00 - midnight gaming - 12 hours

      so 5 x 9 + 18 +12 = 75 hours a week

      It very nearly wrecked my marriage. Now I've quit and I'm realising what an asshole I;ve been to my family for the last 3 years. Thankfully I have a gem of a wife who stuck with me and now our relationship is great

    17. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Do you find you play more in teh winter time? I have a similar lifestyle to you (although, since the Mrs moved in, I game less..) I work 9-5, but my commute is only 5-10 mins. I find in summer I game less, because being the UK I want to enjoy what little nice weather we get. In the winter it's already dark when I get home from work so I easily clock 1-3 hours in the evening.

    18. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I live in Perth, Western Australia. Our winter time is about 15-5 degrees C at night, jacket weather really and occasionally raining. I'm a bit of the opposite, I dislike hot weather so I spend more time indoors in the air conditioning during the summer months (35-40 C easy).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > 48 hours a week is about what I work (ok, it's usually a bit more, but not really much)

      Not all jobs are that heavy. Some employers consider 35 hours/week to be full time, and it's possible (depending on your hourly rate and your spending habits) to pay the bills on less than full time. I currently work about 25 hours per week and put money into savings every month.

      > considering how I usually do NOT have another 8 hours per day left to play games

      I could put 8 hours a day into games and hold my job, no sweat. I'd have to give up language study, reading junk on the internet, and most of my church-related activities, but I could keep my job.

      Also, 8 hours per day would be 56 per week. 48 per week is a bit less than 7 per day, less on work days if you do extra on your days off.

      So yeah, it's totally doable. Personally I can't imagine *wanting* to devote that kind of time to games, but it's entirely possible.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    20. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Someone who spends 4 hours gaming per night is no
      > different to those who spend 4 hours watching TV

      Oh, man, don't even get me started on TV. At least playing games for four hours straight leaves you with some brain function.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    21. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both mine & my girlfriend's laptop have Intel IGMs, & they play DDO & NWN just fine. Just saying.

      (posting Anon so I don't undo my moderation)

    22. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I was in the 24-29 age range (where most of these gamers seem to be) I could easily exist on 3 hours sleep per night, and wouldn't think too much of playing the odd 30 hour session of CS over a weekend. Actually if they spend 12 hours per day at the weekend, that's about 5 hours a day during the week. I'd say I still occasionally do this when I'm really into a game, but more often than not I lose interest too quickly, real life intrudes or I just don't have the stamina anymore.

    23. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Its like tv time. 6 pm to 12 pm with dinner.

      I hope you meant 6pm to 12am or that's one hell of a TV veg out session :)

    24. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're writing from the future or an alternate reality where teleports exist, commutes are not a zero-second thing.

    25. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, don't even get me started on TV. At least playing games for four hours straight leaves you with some brain function.

      You might not know this, but TV also these things called "documentaries"; you actually learn from your television. There are also trivia shows you can play along with from your couch. Not only is it fun to try getting the answer before the contestants do, but you learn something in the process as well.

      I don't watch TV nearly as much as I used to, because I hate reality TV and it's almost the only thing on, but I don't understand the attitude that someone is a lesser person for zoning out on the couch every now and then.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    26. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      So what do they give up for gaming? Life, job or sleep?

      You present a false dichotomy (exept with three false choices, whatever that's called). I think if you do the math, there's plenty of time for gaming, life, job and sleep.

      Who said playing a game is giving up life? Games are fun. Life should be fun.

    27. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      My grandparents spend every free hour reading books. Funny how nobody criticizes them for not having a life.

    28. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I just watch discover and BBC shows mostly...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    29. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      6PM to 11:59:59.99PM
      close enough? ;-)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    30. Re:I know it's silly to ask, but... by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      That is the thing. I've begun to spend less and less time with friends because they head right down to the bar, are unable to really hold my interest conversationally after 2 hours of heavy drinking, and will be simply annoying after 4 hours. I used to drink all the time but I got sick of it. Now if I drink 2 beers in a month I drank a lot.

      So unless something actually fun is going on, I stay at home way more. Part of the time is doing constructive things....projects around the house, reading, going for a bike ride, perhaps learning something to help my career, perhaps doing some side jobs fixing virus infested computers...and the other part of the time is spent browsing the internet and occasionally playing games. I actually feel a lot better in general than I did when I was constantly going out and interacting with my friends.

  8. 7 hours a day? by Centurix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't do that everyday, but I do recall one 10 hour session on Manic Miner in the 80's sometime...

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:7 hours a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's because the submitter can't do maths. During weekdays, you can easily get in 4 hours, and in the weekends 14½ hours per day, yielding 49 hours per week > 48½ hours per week. This magically turns the "hardcore gamer" into nothing very spectacular.

    2. Re:7 hours a day? by Psaakyrn · · Score: 1

      Nothing spectacular, but still significant, since weekends can be used to do tons of other stuff..

    3. Re:7 hours a day? by delinear · · Score: 1

      But then you could say that about any other activity that takes up a lot of your time - some people might enjoy going to the pub, or playing football, or learning guitar, some might pick and choose a little of each, others like games. To a hardcore gamer, the amount of time a hardcore footballer or musician spends on their hobby probably looks significant (just imagine how much gaming you could get done!), the key thing really is to just do what you enjoy in your free time. Sleep is the real pain, if they could eliminate the need for that we'd effectively "live" for a third longer.

  9. Only 48 Hours? by Forethought · · Score: 1

    Only 48 hours? Why thats only 7ish hours a day. Thats barely enough to run heroic instances.

    1. Re:Only 48 Hours? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>Only 48 hours? Why thats only 7ish hours a day. Thats barely enough to run heroic instances.

      Nice.

      What's really sad is that the average American consumes 30 hours of TV and radio per week, but is considered perfectly normal. (http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051227/news_lz1n27list.html)

      Oh, and the same people rotting their brains out watching American Idol are the people who claim gamers are wasting their time playing the games. I can't recall how many times I've been told by couch potatoes that "there's no way they'd be able to spend that much time in front of a computer every day". WTF do they think their flat screen is?? Sigh.

    2. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      WTF do they think their flat screen is??

      A waste of a perfectly good computer monitor?

    3. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Velorium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I don't understand is the amount of shit I used to get for sitting in front of a computer/playing Xbox Live for hours on end when doing that is at least interactive. When you sit and watch TV, you just consume, you don't input anything at all. Personally, I hate most things on TV.

    4. Re:Only 48 Hours? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>A waste of a perfectly good computer monitor?

      Precisely!

    5. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1

      Well radios can always be on the background, people don't always have to be actively listening to it. TV though, I have time for maybe an hour and a half tops on a normal weekday. I can see how others would have more time for it, though there is a point where I can't sit through another show.

    6. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and what about all the time we spend at our stupid pointless jobs??

    7. Re:Only 48 Hours? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I'd argue you get more mental benefit from playing a game versus watching TV. You may be improving hand-eye coordination, teamwork skills, problem solving, etc by playing a game. All you are improving by watching TV is your cholesterol score, but in the wrong direction. Anyone who wants to say that gaming will do that too, needs to play EA Active on the Wii.

    8. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be improving hand-eye coordination

      Not really.

      All you are improving by watching TV is your cholesterol score

      Depends on what you're watching.

      And this will really blow your mind- some of us game 10 hours a day, while watching TV at the same time!! And I've seen people run on a treadmill while watching TV, too! Will wonders never cease????

      Ok so I'll be a little more serious for a minute here. My point is simply that a person can be a complete lazy pig with a TV and/or a video game, or still remain an active and normal person with either one. I knew a guy who the epitome of the fat lazy waste-of-life gamer, and he lost all his gaming systems (i'll skip the sob story) & was left with a crappy TV. Guess what he did- became a lazy slob on the couch watching TV all day... just like he used to do before he got into video games.

    9. Re:Only 48 Hours? by delinear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess to the average TV fan, a lot of gaming just looks like needlessly repetitive nonsense. Of course, to the average gamer, a lot of TV looks like needlessly repetitive nonsense.

    10. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Radio is consumed during my 1:30 commute and 8.5 hours of work. I consume 10 hours a day of "radio" Mp3's podcasts and sirius radio... so in essence I suck up 50 hours just during work and not counting the 8 hours in the garage on saturday working on the bike or hotrod or entertaining. add in my 40 ish minutes nightly of Colbert and Daily show (my pvr rips out the commercials, so each 30 minute show is 20 minutes of content) and I am way way over the "average".

      you see audio can be consumed while doing other things, it's a passive thing. Video-games require attention and active participation... far different.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Only 48 Hours? by delinear · · Score: 1

      I rarely spend a lot of time just watching TV, there are maybe two or three shows a week at any one time that I like to watch for the sake of it. The rest of the time I'll be doing something, working at the laptop or eating or whatever with the TV on, half watching it but as an incidental activity to whatever else I'm doing. Having said that, I'm not a massive TV fan, but it does seem it would be easier to rack up the hours and still have time for other activities, while gaming takes a lot more of your focus.

    12. Re:Only 48 Hours? by delinear · · Score: 1

      There was some study recently that said, on average, gaming is healthier than watching TV because it requires more of your focus and input so it's not so easy to cram as many snacks into your gaping maw. I'm not sure they interviewed some of the gamers I've met when they did the study, but for the average person I guess it kind of makes sense, I occasionally find myself eating just because I'm vegging in front of the TV and it doesn't feel like I'm occupied enough, if I'm in the middle of a marathon gaming session I often find I've skipped meals without realising (I know neither is particularly healthy, but it does seem to anecdotally support the study).

    13. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listen to the radio on my commute & have the TV on while preparing dinner (as well as other times, but a bit of the time is then) ... neither of these uses could be swapped for playing computer games.

    14. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you skipped the meals because you weren't hungry it's fine. You don't need to eat three times per day, or anything like that. It's important to eat when hungry (that might mean saying "Sorry guys, I have to leave" or at least "Need 5 minutes to make a sandwich") but if you aren't hungry you shouldn't eat just because it's a conventional meal time, that's one way that people overeat and become fat.

      The tradition of eating three cooked meals in a day comes from people doing heavy labour. If you're exercising for up to 10 hours per day at a high fraction of your maximum capacity you will need a lot of input energy, playing video games uses only a fraction of the assumed normal numbers. Compare Polar explorers who go on foot, who literally starve, the exercise workload from walking through freezing snow far exceeds the ability of the body to convert food into useful energy, and so they can't eat enough to keep themselves alive (fortunately, being explorers they can leave before they die).

    15. Re:Only 48 Hours? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Many modern flat screens come with a least a VGA input (conversely, many modern graphics cards come with an HDMI output).

      If you really wanted to I'm sure you could play WoW at 1920x1080 on a 55" LED flatscreen. Or better, if you can convince your boss that it's a "reasonable accommodation" for nearsightedness, you might be able to get one on your desk at work =)

    16. Re:Only 48 Hours? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      According to the reference I provided, Mr average consumes 20 hours of TV and 10 of radio... and this presumably includes all the "losers" that have stopped watch TV altogether.

    17. Re:Only 48 Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A waste of a mediocre computer monitor, more like.

    18. Re:Only 48 Hours? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I consume over 50 hours of radio per week because it's something I can do while working.

    19. Re:Only 48 Hours? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I consume several hours of radio a week.
      I listen to the local newstalk station as I drive to and from work.
      something tells me that playing WoW or some other game while driving would be less than optimal from a safety point of view.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    20. Re:Only 48 Hours? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>If you really wanted to I'm sure you could play WoW at 1920x1080 on a 55" LED flatscreen.

      People can and do. My buddy (think the fat gamer in the South Park episode) literally lays back in his Laz-E-Boy all day with a wireless keyboard and mouse in front of his TV, playing WoW. Every hour that he's not working.

      He used to be on the Atkins diet, and was coaching football - actually brought his weight down substantially, but WoW undid all that.

      While that sounds damning for gaming, I know a lot more people that fell into the same fat death spiral by TV.

  10. Are they employed? by pathological+liar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article doesn't look like it says, although I only skimmed. I spent several months unemployed last year and I'd easily hit 40 hours a week playing video games, frequently more. It was shameful, but that's the way it was. When you're living hand-to-mouth for months on end, utterly sapped of any energy or confidence to do anything meaningful, video games are a way to kill time.

    If they hold down a job I don't know whether to be concerned or impressed. If they're "homemakers" then it's no big deal. If they're unemployed I'm disappointed you needed a survey to figure that out.

    1. Re:Are they employed? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      All this discussion just reminds me that video games would be perfect for people stuck in hospitals recovering. They are depressed, don't have anything to do, and would actually benefit from something to get their mind off real life for a few hours. But yes, having a life, family, and job seems incompatible with being a top-ranked gamer, which is why I can't sympathize with those that want to be the best at a game -- at the end of the day, what have you gained?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. My friends... by jaryd · · Score: 1

    think I'm a HUGE gamer and I play maybe 1-2 hours a day if that..

    1. Re:My friends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it's cause you are fat and not cause of how much time u play

  12. Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I play about this amount and still manage to get plenty done. As was said, sleep gets the axe. Have a g/f, job, and I'm a full time student at a university. Thing is, it's what gets most if not all of my free time. I don't watch TV, eat out, etc. Most people burn the same amount of time doing worthless shit, they just don't focus it all on one thing. [ie] videogames

  13. weak. by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    on my week off (yes bitches you heard right, i only have to work 1/2 the year) i probably do 12 hours in a couple of lazy afternoons. i thought that made me hardcore until i ran into a group that have rosters and do 12 hour shifts. and they aren't even gold farmers.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:weak. by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      on my week off (yes bitches you heard right, i only have to work 1/2 the year)

      A year is only 2 weeks where you live?

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  14. "Extreme Gamers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some gaming circles, 48 hours/week would be defined as "casual". As a teenager, I (and others I know) spent >100 hours/week on games like Helbreath, Empires: Dawn of the Modern World, Lineage II, World of Warcraft, and Age of Empires II for months on end. Hell, there were occasions on which we played for 30 or more consecutive hours without sleep--and there were still people (esp. Koreans) that were significantly more extreme.

    1. Re:"Extreme Gamers"? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy XI makes all those games you listed, with the possible exception of L2, look like casual pansy ass games. We'd easily throw down more than 24 hours in a row on that fucking game on a regular basis. Seriously, if you have a family and you play any MMO developed in Asia, you might as well get a divorce and submit your resignation at work, because you'll be fucking playing.

    2. Re:"Extreme Gamers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually like this when Star Wars Galaxies came out. That game had so much to do, so much to learn, so many ways to min/max everything, it became all-consuming.

      I still hate Sony for how they ruined SWG with the various changes they made. In the same right, it freed me from it's chains, as well.

      I am pushing and plowing end-game content in World of Warcraft now, but I don't feel the need to spend 8 to 10 hours a night to 'explore and do everything' anymore. The game is, in many respects, simpler. 2 to 3 hours of battle is enough for me, and I don't feel like I'm missing much, so I can log out. Add in that I flat-out refuse to watch commercial TV (nothing good on), other than catching the news from time to time (rarely, when I can tab-browse 5-10 local, national, and world news sites at the same time anyway, never mind RSS feed readers and the like).

      Basically, computer time == TV time, for me. It's a lot more interactive, and keeps my brain sharper than rotting in front of the TV every night.

  15. The report by cappp · · Score: 2, Informative
    The report seems to be buy-only, but I found the press-release which has a little more information. It's over on http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100527b.html if anyone cares to look.

    What I found most interesting was the methodology section which reads:

    In January 2010, The NPD Group fielded an online survey that was completed by 18,872 consumer panel members ages 2 and older. Responses for individuals ages 13 and older were captured directly, and responses for individuals ages 2-12 were captured by “surrogate reporting,” whereby a parent/guardian brings the child to the computer to answer questions, and the child then answers either with or without the guardian’s assistance. Final survey data was weighted and balanced to represent the U.S. population of individuals ages 2 and older.

    I guess the most obvious way in which error could slip in is via the on-line nature of the survey - possibly their weighting forumla could use some tweaking too?

    1. Re:The report by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Man, don't you hate it when you get p0wned by someone in PvP, then they later tell you, "Oh, by the way... I'm 2 years old!"

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  16. Re:Pfft yourself! by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amateurs.

    No not really, I am in one of the top Warcraft Guilds and have been so since MC was the dungeon to raid (which I wear with pride) but at the same time, playing for about 40 hours a week has just gotten too much. I can totally corroborate that article.

    To be in a guild like ours, you are expected to attend 4-5 raid nights a week, which generally last 3-5 hours. That's pure raid time though, so add a half hour before that to stock up on consumables, ensure that gear is enchanted/gemmed and that sort of thing. Then of course you need some time to make some cash to buy all this stuff, so generally add in at least a half hour a day for dailies - an hour if you want to do a random daily and get the extra badgers.

    Oh yeah, then add in time for ALT runs, or weekend (our guild doesn't do official raids on Friday/Saturday night) booze runs, and that's another good few hours (drunken runs take the longest - but are generally most fun) and soon, you are very very easily up to around that 40 hour week or more.

    For me, it just got to be too much time. I don't enjoy playing unless it's at the pointy end of the spectrum, so I have pretty much given it away. I still log on now and again to keep in touch, chat and have a giggle, but it's amazing how much time in your life you get back when you stop a schedule like that.

    FYI, I chose to stop that raid schedule when I was struggling to wake up each morning (I work Mon-Fri and leave home at 7am) and it was becoming increasingly hard to wake up on time (read: started being late 2-3 times a week) after finishing raids at midnight or later. For me, the maths was really easy - raid and have fun with online friends or keep steady well paying job.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  17. International Demographics? by EspressoFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the study is only done in the US, then I don't think it do the name "Extreme Gamers" justice. Come to Asia, hell, go to Korea's "internet cafes", and you will find people who never leave the place. There are a lot more local mmorpg games here than there are in the States, and those are the type of games that suck your life away. And they are all PC games too, which will debunk the more console than pc claim.

  18. 48h a week? Feh. by Raxxon · · Score: 1

    I play about 10 to 12 hours a day during the week, sometimes more on the weekends. "Hardcore gamers" my ass.

    Granted I also work overnight so I have an advantage on playing. ;)

    1. Re:48h a week? Feh. by mvar · · Score: 1

      When Diablo 2 came out i was in the range of 10hours/day, with minor breaks. Same for Baldur's gate or UFO Defense. Fortunately they have stopped making so addictive games :P

  19. Re:Pfft yourself! by fractoid · · Score: 2

    For me, the maths was really easy - raid and have fun with online friends or keep steady well paying job.

    I'm glad you made the healthy choice. It's fun to just let yourself disappear into a game like WoW, but eventually you have to come out the other side. I've done the 60+ hours a week thing, I'm now down to something like 5-10 hours a week, mostly on the weekends.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  20. Re:I have few friends (I bet that's true!) by cblack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever n00bs, this whole "I have few friends" thread is lame.

  21. Re:I have few friends (I bet that's true!) by Velorium · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ^Win.

  22. Re:Pfft yourself! by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was there too, except I was one of the idiots trying to wrangle 39 other idiots (read: guild officer). At the time I had just graduated from high school and due to a traumatic experience or two (not what you think but too long to detail) I staunchly refused to attend post-secondary or any other school-like institution. So I spent 8-12 hours a day on WoW, building my toon up and helping to run a whole guild instead. Surprisingly it was pretty good management training. In any case, we did the whole "best guild on server, #1 in MC, BWL, AQ40, Naxx, etc" thing, climbed into the top 100 NA guilds at one point, and shortly before the first expansion hit I had burnt out. I quit pretty much cold turkey and with some help from my parents and my now girlfriend, i've never been back. I feel like i've conquered the essence of that game and any new attempts would just be the same shit in a new pile. Now i've got something MUCH more challenging to worry about: University. :)

    Anyways, just wanted to say that there are probably almost as many ex-WoW addicts as there are current ones. Coca^H^H^H^H WoW's a hell of a drug.

  23. That's impressive for "Extreme Gamers," but. . . by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    . . . the real question is, how much do XTREEM GAMERZ play?

    Wow, typing that just made me want to punch myself.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  24. perhaps surprisingly -- one-third of them are fema by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    perhaps surprisingly -- one-third of them pretend to be female online.

    FTFY.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Re:Pfft yourself! by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    FYI, I chose to stop that raid schedule when I was struggling to wake up each morning....

    I chose to stop when I realised the smell I complained about to my landlord was me.

  26. Only? by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

    But dedicated though they may be, the Extreme Gamers are just a small minority: a mere 4% of the US's 174-million-strong gaming public.

    Only 7 million people on the US afford to spend over $300/month on console games?

    --
    Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    1. Re:Only? by Hinhule · · Score: 1

      This was my reaction too, that's like the population of denmark. A small country filled with nothing but gamers.

    2. Re:Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's a place that I'd like to live!

  27. Re:That's impressive for "Extreme Gamers," but. . by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    I'd be curious to see how many hours NOOBS play.

  28. I can't believe... by Byzandula · · Score: 1

    that I actually took time to read these comments in-between playing Counter Strike. I must be slipping.

  29. Re:Pfft yourself! by pcolaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    But dude, they are about to release a new expansion!

  30. Re:Pfft yourself! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    Haha! I can relate. During my residency I was playing Guild Wars for 6 hours a night. Near the end, I had to sell my computer in order to study for my board exam.

  31. Re:That's impressive for "Extreme Gamers," but. . by pcolaman · · Score: 1

    More importantly, I'd be curious to see how many hours NOOBS use sucking at life in general.

  32. Re:perhaps surprisingly -- one-third of them are f by pcolaman · · Score: 1

    And half of those also happen to be pretending to not be FBI. Amazing!

  33. Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a tv card in my computer, though I usually have one or another of my older consoles hooked up to that, so I guess I'm not actually watching tv, per se. Also have multiple computers in the house, and frequently run multiple accounts for a particular MMORPG I like, it makes gameplay more interesting as some aspects of it are only accessible if you have a team together instead of going solo. As a bonus, the extra system online helps to develop my ambidexterity more fully. (Hey, it COULD be useful, one of these days.)

    So, yeah, 48 hrs gameplay per day.....definitely possible. Just not very pretty after a couple all-nighters, is all.

    1. Re:Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure 48 hours of gaming per day is impossible. :)

    2. Re:Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by dkf · · Score: 1

      So, yeah, 48 hrs gameplay per day.....definitely possible.

      [emphasis added]

      You play two games at once? For 24 hours straight? Even with a dual machine set up, I just can't quite grasp how you can concentrate on something for that long. (Well, not unless it's a JRPG with interminably long cut scenes. They'd do for sleeping time...)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      So, yeah, 48 hrs gameplay per day.....definitely possible. Just not very pretty after a couple all-nighters, is all.

      How many hours do you believe there is per day?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      4 games at once. Not a problem.

      I have a friend that can play MTG, Chess, and Char all at the same time and still be pretty much unbeatable. 3 stratagem games that take a Whole LOT of attention and thought.

      so simpler games would be easy to scale up.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Meh, TV, computer monitor, they are the SAME! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking 4 machines, with 4 accounts playing 4 Player Characters (3 on /follow) with some sort of botting assistance. Likely revolving around farming and portage of extra gear for instances etc.
      Do that for 12 hours and there's your 48 hours of game play in one (half of a) day.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  34. Adjectives party by wye43 · · Score: 1

    In other news in a study made by me on the spot, a new class of gamers so-called “Avid Gamers” plays 8 hours a day. And "Heavy Gamers" plays 6 hours a day. And while "Extreme Gamers" are 4% population, there is a "Super Heavy Extreme" class of gamers which make only 1% of the population and play 25 hours a day, which for some random reason would make even more newsworthy crap.

    But maybe extreme is 3 hours a day. You can draw the line everywhere, why stick with 7 specifically? And why with capital letters "Extreme Gamers"? Is this a new consecrated word/expressions?

  35. Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by moniker127 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heres why i'm hardcore:



    -The only time I stop playing my game is when not doing so would be to the permanent detriment to my gaming environment. This means times when Its absolutley necessary for me to go pay rent, to go get food, to go to sleep. Things that, if not taken care of, would stop me from playing.
    -When i'm sleeping, i'm dreaming about my game. Often I post suggestions I dreamed up in the game's forums the next morning.
    -I'm obsessed. When I physically cant play the game, I research the game, and do the math to figure out what would work better how.


    All in all this means I play my game about 18 hours a day. Thats right, 18 goddamn hours. I sleep for the other 6.

    I'm really, really starting to think that theres something wrong with me. But this is what I am- hardcore- theres no denying that. By the way, I play anarchy online, the heroin of mmos.

    1. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Dare · · Score: 1

      The only time I stop playing my game is when not doing so would be to the permanent detriment to my gaming environment.

      All in all this means I play my game about 18 hours a day. Thats right, 18 goddamn hours. I sleep for the other 6.

      So did your character post this or did you do it while sleeping?

    2. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by HopefulIntern · · Score: 0, Troll

      Get a job!

    3. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Bugamn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot is a game. A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

    4. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, being obsessed with a single time-consuming mmo isn't a display of "gaming skill". And no, deciding what repetitive task to do to level up the quickest isn't hard.

    5. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      You do mention paying rent and 'getting' food. So from your wording it's possible that you steal the food, however I am curious where you get the money for rent?

    6. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RetroMUD and BatMUD (links: http://www.retromud.org/ and http://www.batmud.org/) are text based MMOs, which have > 10% of players on 40+ hours a week. That's no graphics, just scrolling text (sometimes coloured). High end eq mobs in each will often take a party 5-12h to kill, first kills double that.

      Now, admittedly, the occasional 40+ hour text-based game player plays from work, where their boss might not realize what's going on because, hey, video games have pictures, right?

      I'm rather surprised, too, that nobody has brought up the professional gaming circuits in Asia, where 40h/week of gaming could only happen if the player was on vacation.

    7. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From selling the food.

    8. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I love slashdot, the game. I leveled up this week by trolling twice, having one first post, and posting one link that directs the viewer to a guy spreading his rectum open.

      I'm halfway to level three. All I need is a Profit! step, a Soviet Union reference, and a FTFY post.

      Then after that I shoot for level four by posting positive stories about Ron Paul and Linux followed up with a rant against DRM.

    9. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I did that too, for about two years, roughly in CS Beta times and some times into Natural Selection (Half-Life mods - though I did of course not play them exclusively, it was more like also these 16+ games in 3 months). I don't regret it, since it didn't really interfere with my life in school, which was pure boredom, and I had my fun. I even still quite fondly remember various situations in these games.

      But I'd advise to significantly reduce that if you either will put a reasonable professional career at risk, or feel lonely (I never did, but my friend who played about exactly the same amount did get somewhat depressed - time to quit at that point).

    10. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very easy to play a text based MMO at work.

    11. Re:Feh to your pitiful hardcore Definition by soppsa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mommy and daddy surely, like so many of these life-gamers.

  36. Former WoW addict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back before I got my job, I was playing World of Warcraft, the biggest time-killer of them all. I was still at school but only finishing my thesis. I knew something is wrong when I saw 70 hours pop up in the "past 7 days" column on my Xfire gaming counter for WoW. So I cancelled my subscription.
    I spent 10 hours/day on a game that wasn't even enjoyable for me anymore! That's crazy!

    1. Re:Former WoW addict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you spend 8 hours/day at an even less enjoyable game, but get paid to do so ;)

  37. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't mean to one up you, but I feel I should share a story from the top 1%.

    I'm a former world first raider from EverQuest 1, and have been a top north american FPS competitor since back in the Quake 3 days until about 2 years ago in Counter-Strike:Source and 1.6. I've run 8-9 hour raids in EQ 1, and farmed things (ie. ToV key, stuipd fucking rare skeleton) for over 60 hours before straight. If 40 hours qualifies the top 4%, I'd consider myself formerly in the top 1%. Some years back (2006?) I quit EQ1 for WoW because I couldn't do it anymore. I'd gone to rehab for EQ1 and, the first day after getting out I walked nearly 2 hours in the middle of the night to a friends place (didnt have a car at the time) who was up all night to borrow his EQ 1 cds, walked home and was playing again before dawn.

    It probably sounds odd to think of someone saying Molten Core and BWL (never did Naxxramas though) were "casual" for me, but that's exactly what it was. I was in the 2nd place guild on my server in Vanilla, the first on alliance in early TBC, second on server (horde) in late TBC, first (horde) in early WotLK, and now first (alliance) in late WotLK. I raid 3-5 nights a week as you say, for 4 hours of pure raid time per night, I have 5 80 alts - 4 of them ICC geared, 2 of them 2k+ rated in pvp on all 3 teams. I know this is abnormal, "extreme" but looking back on my EQ1 life I still feel casual by comparison. That shit was crazy.

    Probably my favorite EQ 1 story of addiction (favorite as in the most telling, imo) was 2 wizards (husband and wife) in my guild, who were hooked on meth - started playing EverQuest 1 - and just one day completely forgot to score more meth because they couldn't leave EQ - and quit cold turkey, having completely forgotten about Meth.

    The thing is - as human beings we are attracted to certain things more than anything else. When you get really into a game and start thinking about the bonding experiences of difficult situations in raids or pvp - and how you couldn't have accomplished that without them, or would be dead were it not for another gamer - that to me is comparable to a blood brother borne in a foxhole in a war. The foxhole might be a dragon raid, and the blood brother might be a virtual priest avatar - but the bond can be identical I think. At the same time, the surreal worlds where we are all so much more than mere men working 9-5 is impossible to deny the simple attraction of. Any sense of hopelessnes, weakness, loss that you might experience in the real world is caused by a tangible entity in a game world - and is usually solved by severing the head of some dragon or god - would that it be so easy in real life - perhaps games would not hold the bond that they do.

  38. Re:Pfft yourself! by Custard+Horse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dad? Where have you been? I've been worried.

  39. Re:I have [a] few friends by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a few friends that play games this much. On consoles. The thing is, however, that it doesnt make them good. Console players IME tend to have a lot less 'skill'; ie- twitch reflexes and battlefield awareness.

    I think that has little to do with who plays what and more to do with the environment they choose to play in. A PC gaming rig is much more likely, historically speaking, to have a higher fidelity in display, audio, and input devices.

    I don't need a whole hand to count the number of console games that support multiple displays, and I'd wager more people use stereo instead of positional audio with their TV. A console is more likely to be played at a lower resolution on a bigger display, sitting back on a couch in a living room with the dog or other family distractions. Some console games I don't mind playing while lying down, which certainly isn't conducive to alertness, and I'm fine with falling asleep controller-in-hand. It's entertainment.

    As a controller junkie I will choose developer sanctioned auto-aim assist rather than the grubby sandbox of PC aimbot mods. So game developers are the biggest influence in what skills are required by the player. I played flight sims in the days when, if you didn't own a Thrustmaster flight stick with its own dedicated controller card, you weren't serious. Then Freelancer came out and suddenly you could pilot with a mouse and frakking beat the game. That was unsettling. Flight sims haven't been the same since, because developers went mainstream and accessible. I think the RTS is still the only genre that truly benefits from a keyboard and mouse, because they haven't perfected radial menus yet, and even MMOs are getting menu accessible.

    Moral of the story, play PC games if you want to have a challenge. Consoles are fun if you like games with stories.

    Uhh.. Activision, PopCap and LucasArts would like to have a word with you...

  40. Immense relief by biscuitlover · · Score: 1

    I was worried that I was playing too much at around 10 hours per week. Thanks, hardcore people! I salute your lack of personal hygiene

  41. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously don't get where you get all the content to raid 4-5 nights a week if you really were playing in a top guild.

    The current pattern seems to be that hard mode progression takes about 4-5 days of intense raiding, and after that the schedule shrinks to one day of farming for a few hours. This has been the case with all the instances so far in the current expansion.

    For those "rather good" guilds the situation is probably entirely different, but I can't remember the last time I've had to play for more than 8 hours a week after the first week of any new instance launch.

  42. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as someone who has both spent many years of my life as as an isolated gamer type (and a couple of times had to go on anti-depressants), and also some periods of my life actually going out and doing things.. I have to say that if you put as much effort into real life as you do into gaming, you would get far greater rewards.

    I'm not saying you can't also play games and chat online as these things are fun and definitely still have an element of sociability, but if you joined some kind of real life club or spent some time doing exercise to level up your real body instead of your avatar, you'd be feeling a lot better both mentally and physically (the two are very linked anyway.. simply being more fit really helps your mood and concentration levels), and more able to cope with the "real world" you seem to be so scared of.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  43. Re:Pfft yourself! by beowulfcluster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Coca^H^H^H^H WoW's a hell of a drug.

    It sure is. My epiphany came one day when I realized it had been 2 years since I last picked up my guitar, something I was quite serious about before I started playing WoW. I quit cold turkey too. I've been back now and then since then to chat and fool around but I'm also one of those who wants to play at the so called top or not at all. Since the top is something I know I can't do anymore, I've hardly felt the pull at all. It's quite a nice thing that getting back on that hardcore raiding horse with WoW is not that easy. You can't just call your dealer in one second if you get the urge on a tuesday night. You have to put time in to catch up gearwise from where you where when you left off. Even if you manage that on your own (they've made it easier but having to grind heroics for badges with random idiots is an experience that can cure any addict) you have to find and apply to and convince a proper raid guild to take you in. So once you manage to quit for long enough, it's not something you can pick up again on an impulse since it's not just up to you. You'll still have quite a bit of time to consider what you're doing.

  44. Re:I have [a] few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The technical gap you talk about is closing. Most consoles today (at least in the hardcore segment) ARE hooked up with surround sound, which every game nowadays utilizes and are played an a screen with 1920x1080 or at least 720p. The texture resolution is still a problem, though. Still: while console games DO have stuttering and inconsistent framerates, the problem is still bigger on PC (for the most part).

    I play PC and Consoles, and yes i TRY to get comfy on the couch when playing PS or XBOX, but as alertness rises, i always find myself sitting on the edge of the couch :)

    I completely agree with the point of developers controlling the skillrequirements. Back in the days when gaming was not THAT mainstream, games were made challenging to be a benchmark, todays games need to cater to a wider audience and its "Accessibility, accessibility, accessibility!"

    http://www.hiwiller.com/2010/04/29/if-mario-was-designed-in-2010/

  45. Re:Pfft yourself! by bronney · · Score: 1

    RL is just AFK brah, you know it.

  46. 174 million gaming public? by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find that extremely hard to believe. The population of the US is about 300 million, and 174 million is more than half that. However, the average US family size is just over 3, two parents and a single child in the most common case. There is no way that over half the members of most US families play computer games, and that's before we factor in all the millions that live in poverty.

    1. Re:174 million gaming public? by Bugamn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, maybe that depends on the definition of game. Some people consider Farmville to be a game. Maybe that increases the nummbers a bit.

    2. Re:174 million gaming public? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is no way that over half the members of most US families play computer games, and that's before we factor in all the millions that live in poverty.

      Users have probably collectively spent more time playing Solitaire than running any other program on Windows save for possibly Aieeee! Further, you will scarcely find a welfare home without a video game console, typically a current-generation one. I know that when my mom was working two jobs to support me because my father was playing alky deadbeat I had a NES and my best friend on welfare had a Genesis. That's right, y'all bought him a system a whole generation after what my working mom could afford. If they don't have a new system they've hit up the flea and got an old one. For ten bucks (if you dicker) you can get a NES knockoff with two controllers, a light gun, and a bajillion games in it, so most kids have at least that. And there are more TVs than people in this country, and even in countries where people truly live in poverty they usually have a TV and may well have one of these $10 video game systems; they sell them at supermarkets &c in Panama, for example, right next to properly branded and licensed goods.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:174 million gaming public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and the fact that they extrapolated that the online community are no more likely to play than the offline community. To my mind an online survey would likely turn up more gamers than if I specifically questioned people who don't have regular internet access, but I can't see any meaningful way to compensate for that which wouldn't equate to a complete guess, so I'm guessing they just didn't bother. Not to mention people filling out surveys probably have way too much time on their hands and are therefore also more likely to be gamers. "Oh, half the people who filled out our online survey play games, that must mean half the people in the world play games!!" It also doesn't really give much indication of what they classify as "gaming" - online poker, windows solitair, mobile phone games?

    4. Re:174 million gaming public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure about your numbers. I thought the average household may be 3, but that includes widowers and unmarried people bringing the number down. The average family has 2.5 children, meaning probably an average closer to 4, when adjusted for single-parent households. I'm also dubious about the 174 million number, but they're probably including all gaming, even your grandpa playing solitare and your mom playing online flash games.

    5. Re:174 million gaming public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're in poverty doesn't mean you don't play games. I know alot of really poor families that buy games because buying a game every once in a while is cheaper than going to the movies or many other things.

  47. So now that we have their names... by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    ... can we ban them from posting on forums, commenting on blogs and -most importantly- beta testing games??

    IMO that would improve drastically quality of games and the game community.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  48. Botters by NoZart · · Score: 1

    I think them nasty Gold miners, MMO - botters and WoW boxers skew that statistic.

  49. Fuck consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Console players are not gamers! they are couch potatos!

    They are also some of the most immature, loudmouthed, assholes on the planet.

    Fuck fake computer consoles. Fuck console gamers.

  50. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why play with others when you can play with yourself. That's what I do all the time!

  51. Re:Pfft yourself! by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't mean to one up you, but I feel I should share a story from the top 1%.

    Speaking as someone who has both spent many years of my life as as an isolated gamer type (and a couple of times had to go on anti-depressants), and also some periods of my life actually going out and doing things.. I have to say that if you put as much effort into real life as you do into gaming, you would get far greater rewards.

    Interesting, that the two replies to this post of mine take up such a small circle of people.

    You haven't 1'up'ed me. Our guild was in the top 1% of guilds and has consistently been there. Server firsts, few world firsts, but at the same time, I have spent time on mood stabilizers (I have bipolar disorder - check the sig). At the same time, I have been someone who has been into online gaming since the days of Ultima Online, and have worked for Epic Games with the development of Unreal Tournament, so I have been "in as much as can be" in games and games development - but having said that, I can't help but totally agree with the second poster's comment which I have quoted below this:

    I'm not saying you can't also play games and chat online as these things are fun and definitely still have an element of sociability, but if you joined some kind of real life club or spent some time doing exercise to level up your real body instead of your avatar, you'd be feeling a lot better both mentally and physically (the two are very linked anyway.. simply being more fit really helps your mood and concentration levels), and more able to cope with the "real world" you seem to be so scared of.

    While I have been pouring my efforts into both online gaming and my RL work (which is currently a Senior Performance Analyst for a multinational retailer) I have noticed that for every hour I spend honing my e-toon, I can spend the same effort at work and increase my salary. You know all the stuff you do in your guild/clan? That works in RL too. Get a job in an office. They appreciate that common sense just as much and they pay you a lot more than your guild can offer - and in dollars, not in gold.

    As someone who has been through both sides of the spectrum, I can just say, games are meant for entertainment. Play them, have fun, but don't confuse entertainment with real life.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  52. Re:Pfft yourself! by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Dad? Where have you been? I've been worried.

    Good god, I wish I could mod and post int he same thread. That's the funniest thing I have read in weeks :)

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  53. Re:Pfft yourself! by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    I seriously don't get where you get all the content to raid 4-5 nights a week if you really were playing in a top guild.

    The current pattern seems to be that hard mode progression takes about 4-5 days of intense raiding, and after that the schedule shrinks to one day of farming for a few hours. This has been the case with all the instances so far in the current expansion.

    You don't get 25 people all the items they want in 4-5 days of intense raiding. it's not about getting your 1-2 items. Not to dis you here, but if you really were in a top raiding guild, you would have 25 people who knew each and every item they wanted, and they probably wanted 20 items - each working differently in a "set" as such - "i need items x,y,z, to work in such a set, but then when I get items - r,s,t,u I can get "xxx" benefit over my other set which is better overall" and so on.

    Hard mode progression isn't just about getting a kill down once, it's about getting EVERYONE all the items that they want from each encounter.

    So, not to be rude anon coward, but please fuck off with your 8 hours a week nonsense. Do yourself a favour and stop pugging your progression raiding. Get yourself some server or world firsts, and then understand all the effort that goes into them.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  54. Re:Pfft yourself! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I "technically" play far more than 48 hours a week, but most of that is farming bots and autoplayers responding to attacks while I auto farm.

    I did have a Xbox360 playing UTIII automatically once. I used a video capture card to detect basic elements like notice when a game was done and join a new one or was in game.. and it basically ran around randomly (gotta love bluetooth to make it easy to have linux-> xbox360 controls. Basically a python script.. not hard to do if you know python and look up the xbox360 hacking resources.

    It kept joining games and playing for 4 days straight. My "rep" shot up like crazy as people added me to their Like list.

    Honestly, games that require farming are not fun during the farming stages and automating that aspect makes the game fun again.

    So if you looked at me "in game" I'm way WAY over what these guys are.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  55. Re:Pfft yourself! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Yes and no. Gaming CAN be highly social and rewarding... I'm taking 4 player gaming at home or in a lanparty setup. Alone home in your underwear covered in cheetos dust surrounded by Bawls bottles... that is not as rewarding...

    My racing group get's together to do gaming nights. we have 4 xbox 360s hooked to 4 55" plasmas and have a ball playing MWII and other games. when you can trash talk your buddy next to you, or throw things at the friend that is constantly lobbing grenades at your location and killing you 20 seconds after a spawn..... It's worth it.

    It builds community within the group.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  56. Re:Pfft yourself! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    you worked on UT?

    You realize how much of my life you have sucked away with that game???

    Too bad the franchize fell apart.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  57. you aren't an extreme gamer by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    until you've bought your first pack of adult diapers

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you aren't an extreme gamer by Mattskimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Diapers are for amateurs. I have a keyboard macro to keep spamming heals on the tank for the 30 seconds or so it takes me to run to the toilet, shit, wipe my arse and get back. The skill is knowing when this is possible.

    2. Re:you aren't an extreme gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's my +1, Disturbing mod?

    3. Re:you aren't an extreme gamer by iprefermuffins · · Score: 1

      I hope you cast Wash on Hands while you're at it?

    4. Re:you aren't an extreme gamer by Mattskimo · · Score: 1

      Handwipes, next to desk.

    5. Re:you aren't an extreme gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, like you've never had a collection of two liter bottles full of urine under your desk.

  58. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    Yeah one of the most fun times of gaming I ever had was when they let us set up like 40 PCs to play some LAN games in the last week of term.. these days people tend to forego the local aspect because our connections are so much faster, but I definitely agree that if you can get a bunch of people over then it's more fun. Rock Band/Guitar Hero is really good for that if you only have one TV :P

    --
    which is totally what she said
  59. Re:I have [a] few friends by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Last I checked many console games are in the home theater setup. which always has far better speakers, properly set up surround sound, and at least a 900X better amplifier than any PC setup.

    5.1 or 7.1 surround on a pc always balffled me. unless you set up a dedicated room, you cent set up the speakers right.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  60. Re:I have [a] few friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Sierra On-Line.

    The old one who made the quests games, anyway.

  61. Re:I have [a] few friends by chronosan · · Score: 1

    I use a 5.1 surround headset, specifically the Razer Barracuda HP-1.

  62. Re:I have [a] few friends by chronosan · · Score: 1

    Hardly any console games are actually rendered at 720p... (claim to support != rendered at)

  63. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd be feeling a lot better both mentally and physically

    says the n00b who hasn't thrown out his back yet, or required knee/ankle surgery, etc.
    exercise is more beneficial than not, but it certainly takes a toll on your body.

  64. Re:I have [a] few friends by NoZart · · Score: 1

    Hardly any is a bit harsh. Just because there are a few black sheep on out there (Halo, CoD) does not make them the majority.

  65. Guilty by MrTripps · · Score: 1

    I did this for about two years with an MMORPG (not WoW) and had completely rationalized it. Had to get away from it and go back to school.

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  66. ah, video gamer by slyrat · · Score: 1

    It is times like this when I wish they would simply mention that they mean video gamers in the title. Because I know that between the various types of 'games' (card/board/video) I probably spend more than 40 hours a week doing it. Though it really depends on the particular week.

  67. Re:Pfft yourself! by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why play with others when you can play with yourself.

    Too many plugins required? ;)

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  68. Re:Pfft yourself! by Pawnn · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure it was a joke... ;-)

  69. Re:Pfft yourself! by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    Good for both of you. I tried quitting WoW myself a number of times, and finally succeeded about 4 months ago. Along with that, I've stayed away from video games in general as much as possible. It's amazing how much better you feel about yourself when you realize that it IS possible to have a life outside of video games as a geek, no matter what the mockers tell you.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  70. Re:Pfft yourself! by Bungie · · Score: 1

    Back in the day me and my friends would all get together, get stoned, and play Quake or Mario Kart or whatever we had available. Now that we're older we all have separate tastes...one person is big into FPS, another is into RPG's, another is into RTS. We also have wives and families and don't have the space for 4+ networked systems in the living room anymore.

    I'm not big into online gaming myself, but I can totally understand how games like WoW can bring people together who are in the same kind of situation.

    --
    The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
  71. Re:Pfft yourself! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    As someone who has been through both sides of the spectrum, I can just say, games are meant for entertainment. Play them, have fun, but don't confuse entertainment with real life.

    For people who can't succeed at real life or don't think they can, the game world provides more sensation and reward than real life. You can be awesome, beautiful, an important person. In real life you are nobody but on the game server you are Sheldor the Conqueror. Pure escapism. MMO's are just a new twist on the whole thing but it's been a very old problem for quite some time. When I was a kid my escape was books, the local BBS scene, and many other solitary activities. People were difficult, confusing, and complicated.

    I'm happy I'm not working on a gaming jones as described above but real life remains difficult, confusing, and complicated. I think the only difference between guild politics and office politics is... well, there isn't any. Human beings are awful creatures no matter what environment they're acting in.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  72. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    Yes, it certainly takes a toll if you're Doing It Wrong, but you don't have to be so doom and gloom about everything. There are people in their 70/80s who run marathons for crying out loud. If you look after yourself properly then you don't have to destroy your body completely.

    I've spent the last 6 months doing weights at the gym and haven't injured myself at all because I do proper stretches before and after, and don't push myself beyond what I know I'm capable of.

    I've also been doing Parkour for the last month and yes I have had minor injuries each week, but that is no reason to not make use of my body.

    I've broken bones in the past and injured myself plenty of times doing various things, but I'd rather do all those things again than limit myself to living vicariously through games, movies and books (as much as I enjoy all of those). I'm going to enjoy my body while I can. Perhaps I'll end up seriously hurting myself, perhaps I won't - but at least I'm enjoying life :)

    --
    which is totally what she said
  73. Re:perhaps surprisingly -- one-third of them are f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    haha.. no kidding.. I'm a 200lb buck-toothed, coke-bottle glasses wearing 39yr old. My avatar is from a set of pics from a local photography meetup group (including a variation on the model's name). When you Google my screen name pictures of this model shows up instead of my fat ass. I get emails every few hours from guys telling me that I'm not like other girls they know (wow, is that ever true).

  74. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not all doom and gloom, but your 'exercise cures all' mentality is as ridiculous as when Tom Cruise recommended multi-vitamins to Brooke Shields to get over her postpartum depression.

    if the guy is seriously depressed, exercise won't do shit.

  75. Re:Pfft yourself! by timeOday · · Score: 1

    I don't enjoy playing unless it's at the pointy end of the spectrum, so I have pretty much given it away.

    By this I gather you mean it's not fun unless you're one of the better players. I find it very annoying a casual gamer like myself can't have a good match because the people online are simply too good. I can see why they feel compelled to play and play for hours per day. I am playing Forza 3 on XBox 360 and the only way to have a good game is to arrange a private match with fellow casual gamers (which is hard). Why isn't there a ladder system!? My brother just sold his copy of Modern Warfare for the same reason - even playing for ~4 hrs / week wasn't cutting it. So, most of my playing is splitscreen Star Wars Battlefront with my son on the PS2.

    Hasn't the Nintendo proven that there's a big market for casual gamers? The online matchmaking services need to better support us instead of just catering to the vocal hardcore gamers this article is about. I pay the same for XBox Live as anybody else; and on an hour-to-hour basis, far more.

  76. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    I never said exercise cures all, but from experience I can safely say that it will definitely assist even those who are "seriously depressed", but only if they are at the stage where they are wanting to help themselves rather than being so far gone that they don't even want to move ever again kind of thing. I'm not trying to be patronising, I'm saying what has proven to be helpful to me and enabled me to actually enjoy life again for the first time in probably 12 years.

    As I said, body and mind are clearly linked. Just getting fit obviously won't sort all your mental problems, but it certainly creates a better environment for positive thinking by improving your self confidence, concentration and performance and just generally having your body work the way it's meant to.

    Multivitamins - not exactly a cure for depression no, but if your diet is lacking in vitamins then sure your body will stop working as well as it could. If you feel like shit for long enough you can end up with co-morbid depression.

    A sedentary lifestyle pretty much only has negative effects on the human body. You don't have to be working out so hard that you're wrecking your body to be fit btw. I got relatively fit (compared to your average person) just by going for regular walks every couple of days. I then decided that I wanted to go further, but that's just me. I don't want to be one of those old people you see shuffling around, barely able to support their own weight. I'd much rather be one of the ones who is still physically and mentally active enough to go out running if they wanted to.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  77. Re:Pfft yourself! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    8-9 hour raids.

    Surely you've forgotten the cleric epics in sky fire and Fear.

    We raided Fear 39 hours straight over memorial day weekend in 2003 (4?). Every 14 hours. We could predict the order the mobs would spawn in. It was a brutal, brutal break.

    I left work twice and woke up sometime in the early AM once for cleric epics in Skyfire. Then there were the little casual things like the 20+ hours spent getting jboots and similar insane quests with drop rates over 12 hours. No quest step in EQ should have taken over 2 hours. Sure- make it a 96 hour quest, but make it 48 2 hour chunks. Not five 12-20 hour chunks.

    I regularly played over 60 hours a week while working a full time job. I kept playing when my hands went numb and my forearms were killing me from tendonitis.
    I finally went uber at the end, saw everything in the game, and then quit as my right thumb blew out with bursitis.

    I learned things from the experience that benefited my career.

    I was in a "casual guild." We raided 3 days a week, 6 hours a day then probably played another 18 hours a week. It drove the true uber players crazy for the lack of serious play. The play schedule drove truly casual players insane too. They just couldn't keep up but they wanted the uber rewards.

    I also learned that if I get in an activity like this again- go uber from the start. It's actually less effort, less betrayal, less "we'll always be buds", etc.
    It's often much easier there on the leading edge of the game. Heck, we had the dev's go back after 24 months and make a specific encounter in Uqua impossible to beat for about 3 months. It just about killed the guild. Several people gave up.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  78. Re:Pfft yourself! by Bysshe · · Score: 1

    Now i've got something MUCH more challenging to worry about: Girlfriend. :)

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  79. Re:Pfft yourself! by CapnStank · · Score: 1

    [...] I have to say that if you put as much effort into real life as you do into gaming, you would get far greater rewards.

    I actually disagree with this point. The reason why certain aspects of MMORPGs are so addictive is because of the link between effort and reward. In WoW if you spend x amount of time performing your profession you WILL get to 450/450. People see the link between how much time they spend doing something and the reward that comes from it: something that is not guaranteed in life.

    For example, no matter how much time I try I doubt I'll ever become a professional sports player. I've played soccer for probably 17 years of my life and have won medals on a provincial level. But no matter how hard I will not make it professionally. I have had numerous ankle injuries (breaks and multiple sprains) as well as acute asthma that prevent me from becoming a hardcore sprinter. Here, I could put 5 years of effort into practice and training but I'll bet you $50 that I'll still be in the same place I am now, if not slightly further ahead. Here the link between effort and reward is broken as a simple reality comes into play that some don't find out until their 30's... just because mommy told you that "you can do whatever you want in life" it doesn't make it true.

  80. What about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Playing 40 hours a week of Wolfenstein Enemy Territory was my highlight. Then WoW came and no more pleasant sound of ding ding ding.

  81. WOW! by warGod3 · · Score: 1

    That would leave me about 19 hours a week to: interact with my wife and kids, clean, go shopping and work on school!

    I guess I should learn to seriously multitask if I want to get everything done!

    FWIW -
    168 hours in a week

    40 hours of work.
    5 hours of lunch at work.
    6 hours of sleep a night during the week (30 hours).
    8 hours of sleep a night on the weekend (16 hours).
    10 hours of travel time to and from work during the week.
    That's 101 hours.

    Add 48 hours of gaming.

    That leaves 19 hours for eating, bathing, family, shopping, sex, and school (not in that order).

    Sorry, I have a few things better to do than spend 48 hours gaming. Hell, I'm lucky enough to get six hours a week. Now, prior to being married I was easily gaming 50+ hours a week... but, priorities change.

    --
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
  82. Re:Pfft yourself! by ImprovOmega · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed. EQ1 was hardcore. I took up WoW on the weekends when I was an EQ1 raider just to have a break. Moreover, WoW lets you get away with soloing, EQ1 didn't really leave that as a viable option. There were very few places (and very few classes even then) that could solo reasonably effectively and get rewarded for it. This led to boxing. Before I finally quit I was running 4 characters at once and raiding with my main character 4-5 nights a week for 5+ hours a night. The weekends were for gaining experience (the AA system is the devil in EQ) and otherwise supporting my main character. I'm glad to have done with all of it. I've been off of EQ for over a year now and free of a WoW addiction for eight months.

    WoW is to methadone as EQ is to heroin.

  83. Re:That's impressive for "Extreme Gamers," but. . by MediaCastleX · · Score: 1

    IDK, but I think you were supposed to put some numbers in there, too...

  84. Why not? by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    I doubt that many play "computer" games (the summary said "gamer" not "computer gamer"). However, I have no trouble believing that many people play video games at least casually. They might be PC gamers, console gamers, or they might have a portable gaming system like a DS or something. Don't forget that cell phones also include games now too.

    Also, don't forget that not everyone lives in a 2 parents and a single child household. What about those that are retired? Those whose kids have moved out? Singles? You mentioned the average family size, but that's not exactly the same thing as the average household size.

    The demographics for gamers has changed quite a bit over the last couple decades. The average video gamer is about 30 years old now. Many gamers are old enough to have children (and grandchildren). If the parents still like games, the chances of them accepting video gaming in their kids is probably even greater.

    At our current course, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if in another generation that playing video games being close to as being ubiquitous as watching TV is now. It might even surpass TV.

  85. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit gettin' mad at video games.

  86. Re:Pfft yourself! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    an hour if you want to do a random daily and get the extra badgers. Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  87. Re:Pfft yourself! by rcuhljr · · Score: 1

    Actually I agree with the AC more, even in a guild that was only in the top 100~'s of NA guilds once we had an instance clear in an expansion raid times got damn quick. You could clear all the useful content in 1 night of raiding, sometimes a second to pick up a last boss or two you missed. The really good guilds could knock it out in one night. Once people know strats and you can chain pull the trash all the way through clear times dropped dramatically. This is all directed at WoW, but as someone who lead a guild that got all the server firsts other then gruul/magtheridon in TBC, you're wrong in trying to speak for all guilds, The AC is right about most good guilds. Look at EJ or other world first guilds schedules, they do a burst for a week or two tops when new content is released then settle into 1-2 farm nights until the next content patch.

  88. Re:perhaps surprisingly -- one-third of them are f by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    All my characters in Gates of Andaron are female fairies. I don't know what that says about me, except that I plan to turn them over to my daughter when they get to a high enough level. She actually has FUN playing games, rather then being results-oriented like I am. When her imp in WoW told her "Give me a break!" she took him swimming, because "he needed a break." I have however had to ban her from social games like IMVU or Second Life -- she was picking up too many boys. Remember: that "hot chick" avatar might not be an old fat guy, it might actually be a 9 year old girl... you don't want to meet either IRL.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  89. Right On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to play at least 40 hours, I'd say closer to 60 hours. Now that I don't play I love when a new expansion comes out, I just think of all the time I won't be spending trying to level back up and get new shiny, crappy, stupid pretend items. Once you're out of the grip, you can breathe again (or maybe that has to do with a regular shower schedule due to the 60 now free hours).

  90. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    if you spend x amount of time performing your profession you WILL get to 450/450

    That's a lot of the reason I find these "games" so pointless. A lot of it is simply a time investment and nothing more. Some things in real life are simply a time investment too, but your actual achievements definitely do mean a lot more if they're not guaruanteed. But basic things like strength training or healthy eating are guaranteed to have results where you can get to "450/450" if you want to. Just certain other things like success in business require actual ability, and sometimes an element of luck.

    What you say about being a professional athlete is true. But the same applies to gaming. Some people will simply never be able to become professional. games either because they lack the ability. Some people would be capable of working towards it if they put enough effort in. I'm not saying you can definitely rise to the top in anything you do, but I'm saying that a lot of people never even try. You yourself have won medals because you put a lot of effort into soccer, you are probably literally in the top 5% of anyone on earth right now who enjoys playing soccer. To me that's much more of an achievement than doing something as simple and guaranteed as getting to level 80 in WoW.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  91. Re:Pfft yourself! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    You type that post as if you're *proud* of it. Christ, man.

  92. Re:Pfft yourself! by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    Thank you for fixing that, I don't know how I could have missed that. I mean, a big building where I learn interesting things while surrounded by young nubile horny women... vs having my balls squeezed in a garlic press for slips of the mind and tongue? No contest! What the hell WAS I thinking? ;)

  93. Women are... by Bysshe · · Score: 1

    ...like an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a dealer who won't tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time.

    Very challenging :)

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    1. Re:Women are... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Women are simply non-deterministic.

  94. Re:Pfft yourself! by The+Altruist · · Score: 1

    http://gamerwidow.com/
    Finally, there's hope and healing.

  95. Re:Pfft yourself! by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    A sedentary lifestyle is not a cause of depression, it is a symptom of depression.

    Now, with mild depression, people can sometimes break out of it on their own, using a variety of methods, anything that keeps them from focusing on the fact they are depressed. Although going out with friends or starting a hobby is probably as good as exercise.

    And as going to see a movie and going for a run would have the same effect on mild depression, but the latter has the built in excuse of the person being 'tired' so they can come up with an excuse not to do it, it is probably a saner idea to start with a 'getting out and doing things' idea that don't require a lot of work to fight mild depression.

    Note my emphasis on 'mild' for all that. A lot of depression is not treatable without, at minimum, therapy, or even drugs.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  96. Re:Pfft yourself! by mattack2 · · Score: 0

    My epiphany came one day when I realized it had been 2 years since I last picked up my guitar, something I was quite serious about before I started playing WoW.

    So you went from World of WarCraft to Guitar Hero. Isn't that more of a lateral move?

    (just kidding)

  97. Average weight/health status of an "extreme gamer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the health status of these gamers is. Especially with the fact that this generation is the first one to have a life expectancy lower than that of their parents. All contributed to by lack of exercise, a diet of refined carbs, high-fructose corn syrup sweetened beverages and fast food, the meat of which is feed an extremely unhealty diet of fattening corn for the last 180 days of it's life.

    48hrs of sitting each week in addition to school and/or work makes for an extremely sedentary lifestyle. I'm guessing not one of these 4% gamers cook their own food from scratch and most likely subsist on a diet of fast food and soda.

    USA! USA! USA!

  98. Hardcore Gaming Axiom by vitaflo · · Score: 1

    "Everyone who has accomplished more than me in a game has no life. Everyone who has accomplished less is a noob."

  99. Re:Pfft yourself! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Wait..the article mentions hardcore gamers playing on consoles and buying 14 games a month at a cost of $1000 or more. You are playing ONE game for 40 hours a week. That's different because you aren't hardcore...you just play a game that is known to be a huge time sink.

  100. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    No, a sedentary lifestyle is just a result of our modern society, and believe me, when you go get regular exercise it makes you generally less tired and more full of energy. The only times I get tired these days are when I don't get enough sleep. Even after the gym I don't feel "tired", I just feel relaxed. Exercise gets your body producing energy from stored reserves, so as long as you are eating okay it's fine.

    Sure, serious depression is not directly treatable by any of this stuff, but I now firmly believe from my own experience that anyone who makes an effort to get their shit together physically is going to have a lot better chance of keeping it together mentally. It gives you a sense of control, confidence and wellbeing.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  101. Re:Pfft yourself! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger mushroom mushroom...

  102. Re:Pfft yourself! by turing_m · · Score: 1

    Probably my favorite EQ 1 story of addiction (favorite as in the most telling, imo) was 2 wizards (husband and wife) in my guild, who were hooked on meth - started playing EverQuest 1 - and just one day completely forgot to score more meth because they couldn't leave EQ - and quit cold turkey, having completely forgotten about Meth.

    O M F G. Something more addictive than a hard core drug, and it's not even a drug. Not even slashdot is that addictive.

    That story is awesome. Thanks for sharing it. It only confirms my decision to never, ever play an MMO. An FPS clan is bad enough - being part of one nearly caused me to drop out of college. We competed at a similar level too. With such a situation, not only do you have the draw of the challenge of the online sport, able to be played at a moment's notice, with an intense amount of fun and adrenalin, you've got all your friends clamoring for you to get online with them. I'm guessing that with drugs like meth and heroin, you wouldn't have your friends calling you up as what happens with computer games.

    And that's without the draw of an RPG - they endless "one more level" and "one more quest". At least every map on an FPS you have played before. It will still be there the next day. I remember talking to graduated engineers that had lost their jobs because of addiction to Evercrack. No thanks. It was telling that most of the members of another FPS clan we were friends with dropped out of college the next year. And these are people who would probably be at the top of their field and earning good money if they were born say, 10 years earlier.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  103. Re:Pfft yourself! by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why you think you're disagreeing with me. What you said in the first paragraph has nothing to do with what I said. I at no pointed argued that exercise wasn't a good idea in general for people, or that it actually makes people tied.

    Although, as I said, while any sort of activity that requires people going out and interacting with people is a good idea to fight mild depression, exercise is essentially the stupidest suggestion there, considering one of the symptoms of depression is a general sense of tiredness. Ergo, it's much much too easy for the depressed person to come up with a reason not to exercise, when that same excuse wouldn't stop, for example, seeing a movie.

    To actually fight depression, it's just as useful for them to go out every day, and sit, alone, eating in a fast food restaurant, and it's a hell of a lot easier for depressed people to make themselves actually do. Same level of interaction, a lot more likely to happen.

    Depression is not caused by unhealthiness, and 'having your shit together physically' won't do anything about it.

    It is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and it is a spiral downward that can be fought, for mild cases, by actively focusing on other things. Those other things can be exercise, or, well, anything. Mildly depressed people should figure out something they 'like' to do (Although they're not doing it currently because, duh, depressed.) and 'force' themselves to do it, and it's best if this involves other people. If this is exercise, whatever, but that's a stupid suggestion to someone who's not used to it.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  104. Re:Pfft yourself! by somersault · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm not disagreeing overall, just on some specifics because my own experience of depression differs from what you are saying. That may be because the constant mood problems I've had throughout my life are to do with blood sugar regulation though, and exercise definitely helps out in this regard.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  105. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the AC from above, actually I helped farm 2 Water Sprinklers - I definitely remember Skyfire :) I was also a Ranger, so part of the reason I was always helping with water sprinklers was to get Clerics to help me farm my Swirling Sphere of Corruption or w/e it was from Plane of Hate for my Earthguard epic :)

    I remember Uqua too :)

    Some insane part of me misses Uqua though, because our rival guild at the time had gotten there way faster than we did, but when we finally hit Uqua we a) finished Ikkinz 4 that night around the end of raid time, then decided to go in and check it out with people who all decided to stay on after raid time, we dropped twins that night, and Barxt the next day - and suddenly we had caught right back to their tail.

  106. Re:Pfft yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually exercise is something I do very frequently. Originally when I got into EQ1 I was in highschool (a secret most of my guild never knew, they believed I was in college), I was very into martial arts and rowing. The trick is a) not sleeping, and b) not going to class.

    When I eventually ended up in university (where I still am after 6.5 years) I dropped my sports activities but incorporated exercise into my gameplay. For example, get on a griffin with a 3 minute flight time? Do 3 minutes of situps, or squats, or pushups. If you are getting on a griffin or waiting for a dungeon queue or have a break in raid-time you can be very fit by playing MMO's.

    The other aspect is nutrition , which my mom got me into when I was young and I've carried over.

    I do wish I had a higher return interest than video games at times, but I can't think of one I would enjoy more. It's pretty difficult to out-entertain a fantasy world created specifically for your enjoyment du jour. I'm content, if socially dysfunctional: I have no regrets.

  107. I watch 60+hrs of TV a week... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    Does that make me an extreme TV watcher? Or just a couch potato?