Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Planning 2GHz Android Phone For Later This Year

rocket97 writes "On Wednesday, at the Executives Club of Chicago, Motorola CEO Sanjay Jha reportedly decided to chat about the relatively near future of the mobile landscape as he sees it — which, in part, includes the ultimate demise of mobile computers in favor of highly-capable smartphones. This being his vision, Jha discussed Motorola's plans for a smartphone with a 2GHz processor — by the end of this year. While Jha did not want to divulge any further information, Conceivably Tech cites another anonymous Motorola executive who was a little more chatty, talking up a device intended to 'incorporate everything that is technologically possible in a smartphone today.'"

14 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Initial reaction by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Ow, my hand!"

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:Initial reaction by dnahelicase · · Score: 5, Funny

      Psh. Noob. I liquid cool and overclock my snapdragon to 4.5 GHz. The battery life is only about 30 seconds but it's worth it to play mobile crysis at 200fps.

  2. 2Ghz what? by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which ARM variant is it?

    Ghz ain't everything.

  3. Motorola Has Crappy UI by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had the Razr and the Moto Q. It seems like Motorola has the crappiest and most confusing user interfaces ever. If they were loading pure Android, that'd be great. However, Moto customizes the OS with something called "MotoBlur." I assume that this would be a crap firmware/UI. This would prevent the latest Android OS from being used. Also, a two GHz processor sounds great but the impact on battery life will probably outweigh any benefits in a smart phone.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Motorola Has Crappy UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      on the other hand Motorola Droid is stock Android

  4. Carrier problems by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The main problems with this though will be carriers. Its becoming increasingly apparent you can't have 2 year carrier-paid phones and be remotely on the cutting edge. Someone who got the first Android phone released in the US on a 2 year contract still couldn't upgrade it at a lower price. With the iPhone releasing a new phone every year and Android improving by leaps and bounds every other month it seems like, there is just no way that this can't end up with hardware fragmentation because a 528 Mhz Backflip just can't run the same things a 1 Ghz Nexus One or the new Motorola phone at 2 Ghz and the trend for hardware still isn't getting faster and faster, AT&T still only has the Backflip which is really underpowered when compared to the rest of the high end phones which are not on AT&t.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Carrier problems by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On smartphones the update period is often 18 months, verizon does that anyway.
        AT&T does not want any phone that would outshine the iPhone, so don't expect any nice android phones there.

      Hardware fragmentation is the only alternative to stagnation. This is no more an issue than people having different age/power computers. Normal stuff like email and web browsers will work for everyone and spiffy 3d games will just like on pc only run on the latest and greatest.

  5. Highly capable smart phones? by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So we're going to be carrying around phones the size of laptops? Personally I'd rather carry a phone that's just a phone, and a laptop when I need one... it's bad enough that you can barely find a phone without a camera anymore, for those who aren't allowed cameras where they work.

    Obviously one day human/computer interfaces are going to reach the point where they're more efficient than a keyboard, a decently-sized LCD display and mouse, but I can't see that happening for a long time yet.

    1. Re:Highly capable smart phones? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Basic phones are getting rarer, but they aren't that hard to find. I found this article a few minutes ago, supposedly updated today:

      http://reviews.cnet.com/best-basic-phones/

      Oddly, the top entry has a camera, a goof on their part.

      The thing is that people that reject the cameras are a small enough market that it might not be worth giving much attention to.

  6. Re:So? by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Haven't even the marketing types learned by now.that Ghz is a measure of frequency, not speed?

    But it's TWO Ghz! It's rated at TWICE the bogomips, it has to be faster! This is so fast, I can start talking before I even dial the number! Believe me, when it comes to talking on a phone, this faster CPU will make it much, much better!!!!!1

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  7. Re:Perspective by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not a fair comparison. Any core2 is going to stomp to death any ARM clocked at 2Ghz, in floating point it won't even be worth comparing. Ghz ain't everything. This may get these phones into the upper p3- lower p4 levels of performance for non-floating point operations.

  8. Not from Apple == Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Specifications are useless without the design and the status. My equation is simple. If Apple makes it, it is worth buying. If anyone else does, no thanks.

    Think Different.
    Think Better.
    Think Apple.

  9. Right, because there are never trade-offs... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    in engineering. You can always have everything you want. I'm surprised the world hasn't been perfected yet. :-/ Come on, something has to give somewhere. This announcement is worse than vapor. It's vapor that can never exist. Lame.

  10. Re:This is going to be about as useful as 300+dpi by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 4, Informative

    here's a pic of the 300+dpi screen compared to anon 300+dpi iphone:
    linky
    I know that it's not as amazing that apple wants to make it sound, but the pixel density is awesome and would help a lot on applications that have lots of text. Hell it's great for pictures too.